Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/ultras
a
Company ‘‘Gazavtomatika’’, Moscow 119435, Russia
b
Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Saratov 410019, Russia
c
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Marquette University, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
Abstract
This paper describes a novel, noninvasive method for measurement of liquid level in closed metal tanks that are under high
pressure. It is based on the use of ultrasonic Lamb waves propagating along the tank wall. Contact with liquid substantially changes
the characteristics of these waves and this can be used as an indicator of liquid presence. Theoretical analysis shows that the
symmetric and antisymmetric Lamb wave modes, both fundamental and higher order, are sensitive to presence of the liquid. The
optimal wave frequency depends on the thickness of the tank wall and wall material. A prototype level sensor based on this principle
has been developed. It uses two pairs of wedge transducers to generate and detect Lamb waves propagating along the circumference
of the gas tank. An operating frequency of 100 kHz is found to be optimal for use with tanks having a wall thickness of 30–50 mm.
Prototype sensors developed under this program have been used successfully in oil fields in the far northern region of Russia.
Ó 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Noninvasive sensing methods; Liquid level sensor; Ultrasonic lamb waves; Lamb wave transducers
The measurement of liquid level in closed metal tanks acoustic wave through the tank wall and liquid in the
that are under high pressure is an important problem in horizontal direction [1,2]. In this case the output signal
the gas industry. The introduction of sensors inside the appears if the liquid level is higher than the spacing
tank disrupts its integrity, significantly complicates its between input and output transducers. These well-
construction, and is highly undesirable due to possible known acoustic methods however are unsuitable due to
gas leakage and attendant fire hazard. Noninvasive one or more of the following factors: presence of gas
methods based on acoustic waves, which may be gen- bubbles in the liquid, absence of ideal reflecting surfaces,
erated and detected outside the tank, are therefore best and/or presence of acoustic wave scattering structures in
suited for this application. the tanks.
There are many methods of liquid level sensing based An acoustic method, which overcomes these limita-
on acoustic waves. Some of them use acoustic pulses tions, and on the first glance is suitable for use in gas
reflected from the liquid–gas interface to obtain infor- industry, is based on the reverberation effect of acoustic
mation about position of liquid level [1,2]. In this pulses in a tank wall [3]. But attempts made to develop
method acoustic wave is generated by a transducer this method show that its suitability is restricted for one
placed on the bottom of the tank, passes through tank or more of the following reasons.
wall and liquid, reflects from the liquid–gas interface, (1) The minimum usable value of acoustic wave fre-
and comes back to the launching transducer. The delay quency is determined by thickness of the tank wall. The
time of the reflected signal gives the necessary infor- width of the RF pulse used to excite the acoustic
mation. Other methods are based on transmitting an transducer should be less than the time duration of one
cycle of reverberation, which is defined by thickness of
the tank wall. For typical wall thickness of 30–50 mm
q
This article is based on a presentation given at the Ultrasonics the above dictates that an acoustic wave frequency
International 2001. greater than 1–2 MHz should be used.
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-414-288-5579; fax: +1-414-288-
1584/5579.
(2) This method requires the use of large acoustic
E-mail addresses: zaitsev@ire.san.ru (B.D. Zaitsev), shri.joshi@ powers. In order to obtain high sensitivity, that is, long
marquette.edu (S.G. Joshi). time of reverberation, ultrasonic generator/receiver should
0041-624X/02/$ - see front matter Ó 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00459-6
320 V.E. Sakharov et al. / Ultrasonics 41 (2003) 319–322