WIRED + WME FAS] EL 2009.10. 9 EMTPS O|Sst AAPM FMAM AN A (Analysis for the conventional impedance of counterpoise using EMTP) USS" wz + Mate - O1zee - OL at -Hycon Joe « Young Hwan Beak - Gang-Su Lee - Bok Hee Lee) stmt Taq Eze (Jong-Ho Kim + Jeon Abstract ‘When the lightning currents flow through the ground electrode, the grounding system should be evaluated by the grounding impedance rather than the ground resistance because a grounding system shows the transient impedance characteristic by the inductance of the ground electrode and the capacitance of the soil. The ratio of the peak values of electric potential and currents is the conventional impedance that shows the transient characteristic about impulse curents of the grounding system in a roundabout way. The grounding system having low conventional impedance is a fine grounding system with low electric potential when the lightning currents flow. In this paper the conventional impedance of the counterpoise is calculated by using the distributed parameter circuit model and embodied the distributed parameter circuit model by using the EMTP program. The adequacy of the distributed parameter model is examined by comparing the simulated and the measured results. The conventional impedance of the counterpoise is analyzed for first short stroke and subsequent short stroke currents. LA 2 FPA WAaHA ae datas ale Sas BRR: AEZA ase) aaa AASA UBAAE Gale ofelss alelaige] AH] aoe] MS 4 (Ds Wel Bete aaa Eee) Aaleeel Vala oleh aheaie ads Hel YEP Meo, Pde a 10] o Algsldacd SI B7yb olFolatck Beh] ae) wh tn : 8] 8 Ville Teal gate Sa 30, avlaws aaah de asad ay — FHidedse dade Sebel daa a @ gee YOM Aol. FoR yo 7 BE oh 2 AAzsoh este asl aa a7) © WNAGEe VAM BE aH Adages) Yo Slee) AAs V4, ESS SY, dA BS Soe Yeo] BEA Warlagoley eH] BAe Ge} PETG] # IH] & SRE BERS ELdS O83 4 Ws] FRPeAs Aeisen, 22 EEaTs aod EMIPE olgsie] ERYSS ARGS Tesisth. MF WA RMATISLITS olge selsasiey AVAHS| vUe FH] VEAP ELMS ole of BAS BEST, 1G OR aa Gale Hal Ft FH GAY Aalst AG AAAS) FHT AlesieAeh alate} alaaisich a 2. ZO Ae 1, WANS FEA ZLM SIs ates Fig. 1. An equivalent circuit diagram for the distrbvled parameter circuit model of, ‘counterpoise 2.1. AAAs aSundes] M2} AAAS ol Behe} 4) (2) 2) MAND oS SAT, oO] PIAVS Sel oy Ade] EADS HEMRAS GC LEA B)~ (5) Ze] Age. R= Elm e}-1] a] @ sa o-t_ (v/a o VT 1 SAS] Dol, r® A219] wa, s = AAD), p= HAAG, 2 EB MTS, © AB] HAG, WE VE POEL A @~69) Wad HEsEAss AsazS| ARIAS 189) viaiadel BH U7HloA ehe IMGAS 4 Os} Vol Weise. ast Ze az} ahs} SAAS BEB EASse] at Ae AD, @3 BO, WA Be HPI 2 ASR) , 8 wn, an R= ta © V jw GF fw) Mm = exjolne 22 V Ter jwT 3, 2AM WHAWIGAS Aes] sel oa | m ol cate] Beles aaldse ews Bom 9] USMSE el 05 mol halsisiorl Waal VEE Qe EYSE 7sgie. 4) m wills] a AAA S748}4} Sundes) lal aa] Ao al, VE WAARES Aas. EGS] oF ARS 4-819) YZ Vela ov}, Fad =F 9) Bale] G77} BE AIS Belelo] HS Agee} woah, Se USA] VHS Tele Ba] AS @ G84 25 of Gvad 12 me dase AAG Ua} 1B ublolo}, waza Veoh GE a Salo] Zolsisick (4) EMIPAA ALB UNA Ue Heder AHVOLA He Aah DHL) a4 => @ lA, bs AR BAe) AR, ne sHRAaS (front time constant), mit @S}A)zba+(decay time constant), n@ 2-109] we 3H a4, ne AEWA ¢17Kamplitude correction factor)°1¢h. Eld Ged esa Sao Agee aa At Ast Fe WA AAS) Sees Yep a. HE 1. LAL of hs GAZE tet Table 1. The short stroke currents for LPL I yaad Say naa kal Us] az eit 4a] 200 | 10/350 #4 ee wal 50 | 025/100 19) seYE Agate] ala dae Maat 4 Gal: Baio) ee aSHRS Wola ast al 2 9) alstuist del Uebteh. Toei (b) FH GANZ AAA NIZE SAS HS IALZE Zo 4 Fig. 2. The simulations of first short stroke and subsequent short stroke currents, vag4. NBA 2a} 41, WANA] ds #EAss|zou 2 18s TISNAWUAA sao) ESA as Hm Hazae 2EB+3ZEa] 488}e] EMIP 2 S8des THAUIGAS Beis, aaa BS veel, 49e IEEE 812-1914 Ue Behe +4el Ade Ashe, dVeAgsp AARZATS O'R ws 50 muyalalade 10 A & SeFol Adel che ahs Saeicti] ae 3a)st Bo] PHA AHA A OS] WATS azate} Sas} SUG At Se Peas ateh Tari} @) Wee w aaaq AE 3.0 m WAM] S19} Aa HST slates) ulp Fig. 3. Comparison between the measured and simulated curent and potential waveforms for the 50 m countemoise TE 4, 50 m WATAIMS| HORA SzsztaI 29121219) Le Fig. 4. Comparison between the measured and simulated results for the conventional impedance of the 50 m counterpoise We WH det eeapaevds) a AAV Soh Je AslspYo] 2Y 3b] ws @ ABS Bale Helsisich olete ele wet AAS MOS wae] el} UwA AS] SEPARHE sll Yep Teraziaay @ 4o) Gena. Sa aHPANzH] ae a. THE B+ FAM AA7 BAlaAVol Hs} ge Bl wel we sepals] UA ARS WHE AY Waa] WIA ayo Ia] tH A7} FA) BHS BAS Bes, F-gas}sp Easy Eley let Be Bel BR YpalS Bae We HMAMAA Belo] HIS YSep sit. oe 4.2, WAM] Bol we mas go BAARE p2)A9} Zep} Doyo we} o}] AR WAYIGSE Plas) eelay Ege] 4 SBS] YBOS aol cE Ho) yaaa z ole @ ob yeh, Bale old Pea Sel + ei] Bol Fae velo] dels tedeke wale] ae atk) AMG ozo] Do} AS Sel TY Sta), 1a 64a) Zo] QI7} BTV] SALISH ola BAAD BAAS Vole WHA vbdAlae ePeAAIIAS BosteLe, Sundes] wal aa) AQat vaeaigC. Ut WAGE aa Galt Mas} $4 GARE AAS Ageisloo] AVES duel Beas] AH 20 Ome Daalze. OREN impedence Length) (@ doll ae HOHIIA Ha = 49 -Leogtn fm 7 () dol hE ZR SE Olol OE A ANZ! zz FON OHEY woes Fig. 5. The conventional imoodance against first short stroke current as a function of length ag 5, pede 1335 8880 ‘Leng @) delat HE ZR 4 UE 6. Holo CHE HS CHALZE IM FOL OLB AYBAG Was Fig, 6. The conventional imoodance against short stroke current a5 a function of length waAVa2] elt BE dole V9} zy} aa] Ua SU Teer Week: VHS Bw SLLO, AS GAT Mal WME 3m FE WARE Malal#ol glo 7 much dolz|a) sie THe} Wes Ad Be oble & slo TAU a A} S7belateh ER SEAzIe] Se FR dae Naa} See aaa Sado] hE $4 CARE Mae olla) oh a © del WAG ae ade was, 3a BIS} 7H) ACb)S] VITAL HS GA HAA AS GAR AAA Blase He Heda BAAS) vl7} SA) YEbie. ol vlalzlale| gel7} BAMA Tet val apis] eA Be azo AMAL SAKE ALS Boj} Aerize] sola of Ge} aI So] BE Aelelal co] Ax) yet Ue 208 ade. 5.22 walzlale] THA Se Asp Met o| MERPALE EMIPS. THe. AAAs} EIAss| vlRS Sel dalaldol de RBI HS AS YSIS WSAAY, 1S Hoe Aolol of S TAAAYHALS Sols] 2 HIS UA start. Bolas wdzds] Bolt Borgel ote} Tey) BHAA BLE IA SH SHS BALA, kd ae ate] aEFAlze] aebalell abe ref AAdIaA7} S7R= del} sekaeh. ayy olaz|aole Sa] BPA IE Ad at UAT QE dol} Save, 4Ad Fl SLE AAAs] AAS Aa dale) a 9} PEA] OLE WSF FE Zele. azee (1) Siverio Visaero, "A Comprehensive Approach to. the Grounding Resoonse to Lightning Currents", IEE Trans Power Del, Vol. 22. No, 1. Jan 2007 (2) KS CEC 62305-1, UISIALe4-AIIS# : QIeRIAI, 2007, (B_Y.Gen and Phowchuri, "Conelation between ‘eboratory and fied tests on the impulse impedance of rod-type round electrodes’, IEE Proc-Ganer. Transm. Distrib. Vol 150. No. 4, July 2008 OSH), “HRA AUBeP, loiciolm Be ml37~ mate, ZEA, O12, Ais, ODI he OF A", OERBOY- HTT A 8] SSCS A, pp. B8~91, 2008 Leonid Groey, “Lightning Surge Characteristics of Earthing Electrodes,” 29th Intemational Conference on Lightning Protection, pp. 5a~I-1~16, 2008, CD IEEE Std 812-1991, "EE Guide for Measurement of Iirpedance and Safety’ Characteristics of Large, Extended or Interconnected Grounding Systems," IEEE Ine, po9~22, 1981. - 50 -