Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and many consider it to be his finest work. It was Faulkner’s own favorite
novel, primarily, he says, because it is his “most splendid failure.” Depicting
the decline of the once-aristocratic Compson family, the novel is divided into
four parts, each told by a different narrator.
The Story
Section 1: “April Seventh, 1928.”
Most of Benjy’s other memories also focus on Caddy, who alone among the Compsons
genuinely cared for Benjy. Key memories regarding Caddy include a time when she
uses perfume (1905), when she loses her virginity (1909), and her wedding (1910).
Benjy also recalls his name change (from Maury to Benjamin) in 1900, his brother
Quentin’s suicide in 1910, and the sequence of events at the gate which lead to his being
castrated, also in 1910.
Reading Benjy’s section is difficult, but it is not impossible. First, note that there are
two characters named “Maury”-Benjy before 1900 and Mrs. Compson’s brother, “Uncle
Maury” Bascomb-and there are two Quentins-Benjy’s suicidal brother and Caddy’s
illegitimate daughter. Second, you can get some sense of the time by noting who is
taking care of Benjy. Three black servants take care of Benjy at different times: Versh
when Benjy is a small child, T.P. when Benjy is approximately 15 years old, and Luster
in the present, when Benjy is 33.
He begins his section by contemplating time, even breaking the hands off his watch in a
futile attempt to “escape” time. Another minor obsession Quentin has throughout his
section is with shadows; the word “shadow” is repeated constantly throughout his
section (thus recalling Shakespeare’s image of a “walking shadow” in the soliloquy
alluded to by the novel’s title). Alone among the present-day Compsons, Quentin still
feels pride in his family’s noble and glorious past, but he recognizes that today nothing
remains of that past; it is mere shadow, and he is merely a “poor player” strutting and
fretting, powerless to achieve anything of serious importance. Part of Quentin’s mental
perturbation arises from his father’s deep and unswerving cynicism and nihilism; much
of his section is a sort of inner dialogue with his father, in which Quentin hopes to prove
his father wrong. In fact, his suicide may be just that-his escape from time-for Mr.
Compson has told Quentin that as time passes, Quentin will forget his horror, which is
unacceptable to Quentin because forgetting would render his horror meaningless, and so
he escapes time in the only way he can, by drowning himself.
The focus here is entirely upon the present-day, Easter Sunday, and to that end, all
traces of Caddy, including her daughter and even the very mention of her name, have
been removed. The two main narratives presented in this section are fairly
straightforward: Jason’s pursuit of his stolen money and his inevitable come-uppance
when he insults the wrong man in Mottson; and Dilsey’s attendance at an Easter church
service, at which a preacher from St. Louis, Reverend Shegog, delivers a sermon which
stirs in Dilsey an epiphany of doom for the Compson family. As she says, following the
service, “I’ve seed de first en de last ... I seed de beginnin, en now I sees de endin.”
Background
According to Faulkner, the story began with a vision of a little girl’s muddy drawers as
she climbed a tree to look at death while her brothers, lacking her courage, waited
below:
I tried first to tell it with one brother, and that wasn’t enough. That was Section One. I
tried it with another brother, and that wasn’t enough. That was Section Two. I tried the
third brother, because Caddy was still to me too beautiful and too moving to reduce her
to telling what was going on, that it would be more passionate to see her through
somebody else’s eyes, I thought. And that failed and I tried myself-the fourth section- to
tell what happened, and I still failed.[1]
Faulkner added a fifth attempt to tell Caddy Compson’s story in 1945, when he wrote
an “Appendix” to the novel to be included in The Portable Faulkner then being
assembled for Viking Press by Malcolm Cowley. “I should have done this when I wrote
the book,” Faulkner told Cowley. “Then the whole thing would have fallen into pattern
like a jigsaw puzzle when the magician’s wand touched it.” In the Appendix, titled
“Compson 1699-1945” (to resemble an obituary), Faulkner offers some additional
glimpses into Compson family lore, both from the clan’s aristocratic past and in the
years following the dates in the novel.
Before Faulkner wrote The Sound and the Fury, he had written a book which he thought
was to be the book that would make his name as a writer. He wrote his publisher, “I
have written THE book, of which those other things were but foals. I believe it is the
damdest best book you’ll look at this year, and any other publisher.” That manuscript
was Flags in the Dust, and it would not be published until eleven years after Faulkner’s
death.
The discouragement of having Flags turned down, and then severely cut by his friend
Ben Wasson into what would be published as Sartoris, apparently led Faulkner to begin
writing a book entirely for himself, and publishers be damned. That book, originally
titled “Twilight,” was The Sound and the Fury. Later, Faulkner would say it was the
novel he felt most “tender” toward because it had caused him “the most grief and
anguish.”
Still, there are some things on which critics agree. Few dispute that the novel depicts a
“tragedy,” the decline of the Compson family. There is agreement too that much of the
novel is told in a stream-of-consciousness style, in which a character’s unadorned
thoughts are conveyed in a manner roughly equivalent to the way our minds actually
work. Themes critics continuously note in the novel are order, honor, sin. And nearly all
critics consider it a technical masterpiece for the way Faulkner incorporates four distinct
narrative modes in telling the story of a little girl with muddy drawers.
But as any great literary work should, The Sound and the Fury invites a number of
approaches, methods, and philosophies to those who would interpret it. Nearly every
reader agrees that Caddy Compson is a key, if not the key character in the novel, though
critics differ in how prominent her role should be. Much has been made, too, of the
religious backdrop of the story. The present-day setting of Easter has led some critics to
question whether Benjy is some ironic modern-day Christ figure-his age (thirty-three),
in particular, is suggestive of Christ at the time of his crucifixion. Still others view
parallels between Dilsey and the “suffering servant” of Isaiah.[2]