Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by
Presented to
Inter B
Colombo - ENSC
sanctioned practice where a person is put to death by the state as a punishment and
The death penalty is for convicted murderers, but many people now seem to prefer life
Is the death penalty effective? NO! Why are we going to 'punish' a murderer or
rapist, with the 'rest' of death? Why are we going to allow them to get so easily free to
pay for their acts? That's why the death penalty is not effective and although I love it
being legal around the world it is a punishment that has no effective response to these
criminals.
We can condemn to death a thousand murderers, a thousand rapists and yet we will
This conviction deters from crime. Countries that maintain the death penalty often
claim to be a form of deterrence against crime, but this stance has repeatedly been
reducing crime.
As a result of the above, several studies have been relaunched which have tried to
examine whether the death penalty acts as an effective deterrent or, if, on the
contrary, a prison sentence is better when the crime committed merits it. All
There is no clear evidence that the use of the death penalty is a deterrent to
crime. Nor does it seem to be cost-effective. There is also always the possibility that
an innocent person will be executed, as happened in March 1988 with Wille Darden in
In short, most studies tend to confirm that the death penalty is not a deterrent to
reducing crimes. So why are there people still supporting this option? In a democratic
and supposedly Christian society, the death penalty seems to follow the old motto of