Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mortg
A ages
lease
(Lessee) right
s
Contract C
MC
for (Material supplier)
(Lessor) release
00
B R s . 50
+
(In possession) s . 5000
e sR
Ow
+ CASES ON INDEMNITY
Facts:
n One Mr. Keshavdas was the materials supplier for all the
construction going on the plot of land.
+ CASES ON INDEMNITY
n On July 30, 1939, Plaintiff (on the request of the Defendant),
wrote to the Municipal Corporation of Bombay asking them to
transfer the lease of the said plot to the Defendant. This change
is approved by the MCB, but no formal lease is drawn up.
n Defendant argues that there is no cause of action yet and the
suit is premature. He insists that unless and until the
indemnity-holder (Plaintiff) has suffered a loss, he is not
entitled to sue the indemnifier (Defendant). The argument is
simply that under Section 124, the promisor promises to save
the promisee from the loss caused to him and not the loss
which may be caused to him. The argument is expanded
further by saying that until Mr. Keshavdas files a suit against
the Plaintiff and obtains a judgment which the Plaintiff is
compelled to satisfy, the Plaintiff is not entitled to sue the
Defendant.
+ CASES ON INDEMNITY
Issue:
Decision:
Rationale:
n Sections 124 and 125 of ICA are not exhaustive of the whole
law of indemnity. And equitable principles applicable in the
Courts of England will apply in this case.
A Mortgaged
B + C
(Owner of land)
Part of
Sold
purchase
half
money left
of
with D to
this
pay off
land
Mortgage
to B and C
D
(Buyer)
+ CASES ON INDEMNITY
Facts:
n Thereafter, on February 09, 1920, a sale deed for half of this
land was executed by the Plaintiff in favour of Mr. Shanti
Saran for Rs. 16,000.
n Out of Rs. 16000, Rs. 13,500 was left with the purchasers for
paying up the debt to Bansidhar and Khub Chand.
+ CASES ON INDEMNITY
n The mortgagees brought suit against the Plaintiff and after
going through multiple court battles, the Collector ordered a
self-liquidation of mortgage for 3/4th of half of the land held
by the Plaintiff.
n As a result, the Plaintiff had to part with a huge part of his
property. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed this suit for the
recovery of loss that he suffered for the failure of the
Defendant to pay up.
Decision:
Rationale:
(2) All costs which he may be compelled to pay in such suit if, in
bringing or defending it, he did not contravene the orders of the
promisor and acted as it would have been prudent for him to act in
the absence of any contract of indemnity or if the promisor
authorized him to bring or defend the suit;
+ Rights of an indemnity holder when sued
(3) All sums which he may have paid under the terms of any
compromise of any such suit, if the compromise was not contrary
to the orders of the promisor, and was one which it would have
been prudent for the promisee to make in the absence of any
contract of indemnity, or if the promisor authorised him to
compensate the suit.
------------
Note: For costs and sums, this section contemplates that at each
stage, the indemnity holder applied for authority or orders of the
promisor. In the absence of such authority or orders from the
promisor, the indemnity holder has to act as a prudent man.
+ Rights of an indemnity holder when sued
n Note: It is not necessary for the indemnity holder to give notice
of proceedings to the indemnifier. However, it is prudent to give
him notice so that he cannot challenge the decree passed against
the indemnity holder in an action initiated by a third party. Plus,
the indemnifier may also allege that more than reasonable costs
have been incurred by the indemnity holder and thereby
prolong proceedings. Accordingly, it is best to send him notice of
proceedings at least.
+ Rights of an Indemnifier
Thank you!