“Table 34 Fer Capita Water Availabilty in tna 219 Stan coe ‘aie Gane . x ho we ea Pn on ae ho bn hw a 2io204 3132015 33206 3132017 Lazo Neeser Figure 3.5: Groundwater Depletion in India™‘Annexure referred in reply o parts (a & (of Lok Sabha Unstared Question No. ‘on Discharge of Untreated cis aaenpmmcmmage hl Pere dir oie by wetnd odes of ‘Static eas fsenage geeron nbn ee and esimencapacy eae eee s Whe S]_ SaaUnTonRy Em cenay | PRT nell ni % et * ‘ene | szopat| tot | ni | tor | ce ansara Waser | —— 2 owe 2 ana Paes wri TF [ara Pee = E rn owe alma fea 708 oat 1 [sana [ my [ |x 13 Sar 1275 5 [Anan e[oranaaa 1 as +The [ome =r : oboe a er 2 [loi | [bana B 5 foes 5 758 © tiga | Soa ai ST fi 12 | Haryana 1413, 8527 1 {bat 13 Himachal Pradesh 110 T1472 5 joes bie has a ir Tea ae [etn wae aes 1 [es [e900] 09 | ane arr = iL mis | as] 9st 15D ——, 7 z 1 aah [0514] a] aa] 83 [wach ra an crs 15 tes ssa eno 2st a8 sis ie 15 [ge [987 [un] 13]rl sk il i, 9 3/3y lil, | | 1a se il Lik 4 A lL aN still L buat i myPercentage distribution of households having acest atrne Dut not using it by enon: Rural trea, 6% aihes, 38% osu src, mM peso reece, 26% a hansen vr, 200% lining of tela, 23% Figure 3: Percentage distribution of vilages by leaning agen for community tits 49 ‘Nab BEpljedby Poca Resins BA er Figure 4: Perentaedstrition of wads by cleaning agen for commasitypulc tts Nady ‘opel by Ress wines [mpl Lac nM mutica bay \ Ay oerosueeesaees ect a Ue igure: Fecentage of wards by avait) and us of sense fe tal Be fal LG u newsmen Une comecovey, a) pena 6% odin, 9% open ach The Fur: Percentage dstrutin hosel by diag 9 sen: Ub eine, a pen ty, 0. keg, ro cengcea 228, corpus, Las Ay eure: Percentage dita files by type fringe arrange ws ‘Pain Kahin ONo agent Figures Prena fuses ihre rangement o MT wy 2 wa am s sis us oT Ute