Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WP Knoll CoWorking PDF
WP Knoll CoWorking PDF
Figure 3. The average age of a co-working space member is 39, as reported by Emergent Research; only 20 per cent of members are younger than 30
and 7 per cent are older than 60.
the average age of co-workers is 39 years other non-employees for use as co-working strategy are primarily focused on several
old, and 52 per cent are male; only 9 per space. This strategy has been embraced common ideals: to attract and retain talent,
cent work for companies with more than 100 by firms with progressive cultures, primarily drive innovation, build community, optimise
employees (Figure 3).9 those in the technology sector. productivity and use space more efficiently.
Drive innovation
Figure 5. Based on research from both McKinsey Global Institute and Boston Consulting Group, Because co-working spaces are conducive
there will be a worldwide shortage of talent in the years ahead. to creativity and idea sharing, they are ideal
work environments for innovation, engineering
Figure 12. Creating serendipitous opportunities for connection and collaboration is a primary goal of Civic Hall and the space is designed and furnished
to facilitate such meetings.
EN
MG
MG
EN
MGEN
MGEN
MGEN
MGEN
MGEN ES-60
MGEN
MGEN MGEN MGEN
EN
MG
MG
MGEN MGEN MGEN
EN
MGEN
KL2
ACTTB2GL
KL1
KL1
C3C ACTTB2GL
ELH ELH
ACTTB2GL
RE72
RE72
RE72
RE72
REGEN
REGEN
LED1SBASE LED1SBASE
36-14H
7236
7236
10'-10"
LED1SBASE LED1SBASE
REGEN
REGEN
SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK
ACTTB2GL
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
ACTTB2GL
ACTTB2GL
2'
ELH ELH
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
REGEN
REGEN
RS63
RS63
RS63
RS63
SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK
ACTTB2GL
LED1SBASE LED1SBASE
6636
6636
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
REGEN
REGEN
C3C
LED1SBASE LED1SBASE
ELH ELH
SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
5'
C3C
REGEN
TS3636D
REGEN
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
ELH
RE
RS87
RS87
GE
N
REGEN
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SP K TS
36
K
AR AR
AR
SP
36
K SP D
AR
SP
9024
K
N
GE
ES-36 ES-36
RE
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SP
AR
AR
SP
ELH
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
T
IS
T
T
IS
IS
IS
TW
TW
TW
TW
ELH
ELH
ELH
ELH
ELH
ELH
ELH
T
IS
T
T
IS
IS
IS
TW
TW
TW
TW
TS3636D
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
K
AR
SP
SP
AR
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
REGEN
ELH
ES-36 K ES-36
K
RS75
RS75
AR
AR
SP
SP
SP
AR
AR
SP
K
K
SP
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
AR
AR
ES-36 ES-36
SP
AR
SP
K
AR
SP
7824
K
K
K
SP
SP
AR
AR
REGEN
AR
AR
SP
SP
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
ELH
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
N
GE
RE
ACTTB2GL
RE60
RE60
TS
6024
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
36
36
REGEN
KL1
KL1 ELH
ACTTB2GL
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
ACTTB2GL
ACTTB2GL
ACTTB2GL
ACTTB2GL
KL1
ACTTB2GL
REGEN
TS3636D
REGEN
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
KL1
ACTTB2GL ACTTB2GL
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
ACTTB2GL
REGEN
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
SPARK
TS3636D
REGEN
RE72
RE72
RE72
RE72
RE72
RE72
RE72
RE72
RE72
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
7236
7236
7236
7236
ELD
ELD ELD LED1SBASE LED1SBASE LED1SBASE LED1SBASE LED1SBASE
20-20H
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
4824(TRIM)
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
4824
TS3636D
RE36
RE36
RS45
RS45
RE42
RE42
ACTTB2GL
ELD
ACTTB2GL
ELD
ELD
SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK SPARK ELD
ELD ELCD ELCD ELCD ELCD ELCD
MGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
ELD ELD
RS81
RS81
MGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
BXS
RS63
RS63
RS63
RS63
RS63
RS63
RS63
RS63
RS63
RS63
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
RS81
RS81
RS81
RS81
REGEN
T72
6636
6636
6636
6636
6636
RS75 RS75
MGEN
MGEN
8424
MGEN
ELCD
ELCD
ELCD
ELCD
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
7830 7830
MGEN
8424
8424
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
ACTTB2GL
RS75 RS75
BXS
REGEN
REGEN
MGEN
REGEN
REGEN
RS75 RS75
RE84
RE84
C--
REGEN
REGEN
F18 F18
RE78
RE78
RE84
RE84
ELCD
ELCD
SBOXM-PP-5-A SBOXM-PP-5-A
MGEN
MGEN
ELCD
ELCD
MGEN
BXS
RE60
RE60
RE60
RE60
T72
RE60
RE60
RE60
REGEN
N
RE
GE
MGEN
GE
RE
REGEN
4824
MGEN
N
6024
RE
GE
RE
6024
REGEN
GE
RE
GE
REGEN REGEN
RE48
RE48
6024
6024
N
6024
ELD RR33
RR33 RS57
TS3636D
TS3636D
TS3636D
TS3636D
TS3636D
TS3636D
RR39
ELD
ELD
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
REGEN
ELD
ELD
RR33 RS57
ELD RR39 ELD ELD
RR39 RS69 RR39 RS63
192'
Figure 13. Creating serendipitous opportunities for connection and collaboration is a primary goal of Civic Hall and the space is designed and furnished
to facilitate such meetings.
Figure 14. The cost of providing accommodation for office workers in terms of both capital
Perceived Drawbacks construction costs and building operation costs is diminished by the costs of their salaries
and benefits. 23
Despite the many benefits of co-working,
several negative perceptions may deter
companies from seriously considering
external co-working spaces for their co-working environment. The wide range the total expenses of developing, owning and
employees. Following are some of the most of businesses, roles and personalities operating space in a typical office building,
common concerns. present in these spaces can contribute to over the 25-year term of an occupational
an unpredictable environment that lacks the lease. The remaining 49 per cent of costs are
Inconsistent office culture common courtesies of a traditional office. devoted to mechanical and electrical (M&E)
services, furnishings and other operational
Because a co-working space is often
Security, intellectual property and other expenses.23 But, with salaries and benefits
composed of individuals representing diverse
competitive concerns added to the equation, only 7.5 per cent of a
organisations, there may be limited ability to
company’s total investment covers building
shape or change an office culture to reflect Although security breaches are possible in
construction and maintenance, while 8.5 per
an organisation’s unique values. It also can any office environment, they carry greater
cent is devoted to furnishings, M&E services
be more difficult to maintain a common team risk in an environment where individuals do
and other operational costs. The balance
spirit when employees are working at different not share the same employer and may not
— 85 per cent — covers the salary and
locations with distinct atmospheres. even know each other. With the transparency
benefits costs of building occupants (Figure
and openness that characterise co-working
14).24 As a result, factors that influence and
Lack of connection environments, businesses must be extra
improve the effectiveness of staff will have a
diligent at protecting their competitive assets,
Due to their co-location and in-person far greater financial impact than those that
including intellectual property and confidential
interactions with other co-working only affect space efficiency. CRE and facilities
or sensitive company information. Most
members, employees working in an off-site departments which embrace co-working as
importantly, organisations need to consider
co-working space might actually develop a practical real estate strategy can contribute
their employees; in a highly competitive
closer relationships with colleagues from to improving an organisation’s overall
marketplace, co-working environments can
other companies rather than building performance by providing flexible, productive
provide an opportune recruitment location for
a collaborative bond within their own work environments that foster collaboration,
competing organisations.
organisation. In addition, these remote innovation, extended networking and passive
employees may feel a disconnection from recruiting. As co-working principles continue
day-to-day business operations and might to evolve and influence broader ‘co-learning’
worry about being overlooked for career The Bottom Line and ‘co-living’ concepts, businesses that
development opportunities. Why should CRE executives pay attention to integrate these progressive strategies into
co-working trends? In short, because people their own enterprises will be well equipped
Excessive noise and distractions are a company’s greatest investment, and to meet the needs and expectations of the
their productivity and satisfaction are key to future workforce.
The acoustical challenges and visual
distractions that can interfere with the organisation’s future performance and
concentration in any open plan space layout overall competitiveness. Construction and
may be even more significant in a transitional maintenance costs represent 51 per cent of
(3) Building Owners and Managers (13) Allen, D. (2008) ‘Retaining Talent’, SHRM Verhoeve, W. ‘A Look at Co-Working Spaces’,
Association (2015) ‘Office experience Foundation, p. 3. Knoll, Inc.
exchange report’, online. https://eer.boma.org/
Boma/marketing.aspx, Accessed 6 December (14) Gallup (2013) ‘State of the Global
2015. [only available to subscribers] Workplace’, Gallup, p. 11.
(4) Foertsch, C. and Cagnol, R. (2013) ‘The (15) Glassdoor (2014) ‘10 Biggest Job Likes
history of coworking in a timeline’, September, and Gripes of Employees’.
available at: deskmag.com. http://www. (16) Pappano, L. (2012) ‘Got the next great
deskmag.com/en/the-history-of-coworking- idea?’, New York Times, July, p. ED10.
spaces-in-a-timeline, Accessed 11 November
2015. (17) Waber, B., Magnolfi, J. and Lindsay,
G. (2014) ‘Workspaces that move people’,
(5) MBO Partners (2015) ‘State of Harvard Business Review, October online.
Independence in America 2015’, p. 5. https://
www.mbopartners.com/uploads/files/ (18) Seppälä, E. and Cameron, K. (2015)
state-of-independence-reports/MBO-SOI- ‘Proof that positive work cultures are more
REPORT-FINAL-9-28-2015.pdf, Accessed 17 productive’, Harvard Business Review,
December 2015. December, online.
(6) Kesler, S. (2016) ‘WeWork valuation soars (19) Smulian, A. (2013) ‘Akerman Senterfitt’s
to $16 billion’, Fast Company, March, online. Collaboration with The LAB Miami and the
http://www.fastcompany.com/3057670/ Local Startup Community Showcased in the
wework-valuation-soars-to-16-billion, Media’, Akerman web site.
Accessed 7 January 2016. (20) Global Coworking Unconference
(7) Clark, P. (2016) ‘Co-working spaces Conference/Emergent Research, ref. 1 above.
are going corporate’, BloombergBusiness, (21) Knoll. (2013) ‘Galvanize 1.0: In Focus,
February, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/ Knoll Project Case Study,’ Knoll, Inc.
articles/2016-02-19/co-working-spaces-are-
going-corporate, Accessed 7 March 2016. (22) Sieck, H. (2015) ‘Civic Hall, Knoll Project
Case Study’, Knoll, Inc.
(8) Butcher, M. (2016) ‘Second Home raises
$10.7m from Yuri Milner, Martin Lau, Index (23) Commission for Architecture & the Built
and plans Lisbon home’, January, available Environment and British Council for Offices
at: techcrunch.com. http://techcrunch. (2005) ‘The Impact of Office Design on
com/2016/01/18/second-home-raises-10-7m- Business Performance’, p. 44.
from-yuri-milner-martin-lau-index-and-plans- (24) Ibid.
lisbon-home/, Accessed 23 January 2016.
Through research, Knoll explores the connection between workspace design and human behavior, health and performance, and the
quality of the user experience. We share and apply what we learn to inform product development and help our customers shape their work
environments. To learn more about this topic or other research resources Knoll can provide, visit www.knoll.com/research