You are on page 1of 2

EDUARDO, RAY BRADLEY B.

Legal Ethics – Sat. 6:00-9:00pm

LEGAL ETHICS CASE ANALYSIS


Who (parties) and what ANTONIO M. LORENZANA v. JUDGE MA. CECILIA I.AUSTRIA,
(case no. / date) A.M. No. RTJ-09-2200, April 2, 2014
Why and how
Complainant (all the - The respondent judge posted pictures of herself in
circumstances that Friendster with hopes of looking for a compatible partner.
lead to file a case) The photo shows her wearing a cloth that barely shows
her skin, as if nothing was worn underneath.
Respondent - Respondent judge believes that her act of maintaining a
(defenses) personal social networking account (displaying photos of
herself and disclosing personal details as a magistrate in
the account) – even during these changing times when
social networking websites seem to be the trend –
constitutes an act of impropriety which cannot be legally
justified by the public’s acceptance of this type of conduct.
What is the - In this case, none.
recommendation of the
IBP-CBD?
What is the - That the respondent is unbecoming a judge and found
recommendation of guilty for violation of Section 6, Canon 6 of the New Code
OCA? of Judicial Conduct.
- That she be fined P20,000.00 and a stern warning that a
repetition of the same will be dealt with more severely.
Issues raised to the SC - Whether or not the respondent judge should be
suspended.
Dispositive portion - No, the Court ruled in accordance with OCA
(final decision) recommendation.
- That the respondent judge was found guilty for violation of
the same and increased the penalty to P21,000.00 with a
stern warning that a repetition of the same or any similar
act shall be dealt with more severely.
What are the core - Respect for authority
moral values that were - Respect for human sexuality
ignored?
What are the virtues - Modesty
that are missing - Purity
What are the vices that - Lust
the respondent got - Temptation
involved in? - Ignobility
What are the lessons - A judge should always show courtesy and modesty to
that I learned from this thyself. Such act as presented in this case is highly
case so that no case of intolerable in the Bar and the Judiciary.
similar can be filed
against me in the
EDUARDO, RAY BRADLEY B.
Legal Ethics – Sat. 6:00-9:00pm
future?

You might also like