Cab.) 50 1000 elo toys i ne es THE NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY TENTH TO TWELFTH ROUND DECEMBER 1955—AUGUST 1957 NUMBER 45 REPORT ON INDIAN VILLAGES (A STUDY OF SOME SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS) Issued by: ‘The Cabinet Secretariat : Government of India Printed by the Eka Press, Caleutta in 1961 and published by the Manager of Publications, Civil Lines, Delhi-8 pe Va For wre ofthe Indian Staiaical TntituteE THE NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY TENTH TO TWELFTH ROUND DECEMBER 1955—AUGUST 1957 NUMBER 45 , REPORT ON " INDIAN VILLAGES S (A STUDY OF SOME SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS) ~ Tasued by The Cabinet Secretariat : Government of India Printed by the Eka Pross, Calcutta in 1961 and published by the Manager of Publications, Civil Lines, Delhi-8Note of Caution Being the scanned copy of old NSS report, this document may suffer from following limitations - i. Poor Quality of the Scanned images. ii, Page(s) missing in between. iii, Improper sequencing/arrangement.© INDIA, CABINET SECRETARIAT 1901 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Tho planning of the survey was done by the Indian Statistical Institute, The data for the enquiries wore collected by tho Directorate of National Sample Survey, Cabinet Secretariat, Government of India in all the States except Wost Bengal whore it was done by the Indian Statistioal Institute. The various stages of processing work were undertaken by the Compu- tation, Punching and Machine Tabulation Sections of the Indian Statistical Institute. ‘The report was prepared by H. B Choudhury umder tho general direction of Mohanlal Ganguli. Amalendu Niyogi was responsible for preparing the end tables, ifCONTENTS Pace, CHarrer Oxe —: Tntroduction ings 1 Two: Distribution of villages according to size class of population 4 ‘Prmxn : Operational system of agriculture 6 Four ; Distribution of villages according to distance from some important centres 8 Five: Condition of roads connecting villages with important centres and the mode of conveyance i Sell Six + Social, educational and medical services 16 Appennrx 1; Comparison of half-sample results : Tables 22 IE: Facsimile of the Schedules of Investigation 4 INDEX TO TABLES IN THE TEXT CHAPTER ‘Two ‘pamtm 2.1: Poroantago distribution of villags by size lass of population: tenth to twelfth round 1 2.2 + Porwnag detonate hy ela of oplaon = toh both round 5 OAPTER THREE Magee 8.1 Posontage disbaion of vligse andor doen Aypos of ting: lov and twelfth rounds eine 3.2 + Pawoniage dstbtion of viages hy tom of mamawe amd woth and towlfth rounds 7 4.31 Paroiag dtsbtion of vgs by aur of igstion ent nd eri rounds ex. Br OMAPTER FOUR ‘tamn 4.1; Average distance in miles from villages to some inearet important contros; tanth ‘0 trolfth round ° 4.24 Average distance in miles from villages to some nearest important centres by. sito lass of population :elovonth and twolfth rounds 10National Sample Survey » CHAPTER FIVE Paor ‘Tammx 5.1: Poroontago disteibution of villages by condition of connecting road and by rounda from nearest education, communication, hoalth and administrative contres with ‘thoir avorage distance in milos tenth to twelfth round i 9 Peroontage distribution of villagos by moda of conveyance mainly sod to roach some distant centres and by rounds: tenth to twelfth round i CHAPTER SIX Tanta 6.1: Porcontage distribution of villages by source of social ani educative sorvioss ‘loventh and twelfth rounds 4 peerae 6.2 Percentage of villages by type of educational institutions: tenth and twelfth rounds ° ‘ 1" 6.3: Percentage of villages by type and eategory of educational institutions : tenth and ‘owolfth rounds ha 6.4: Average number of students ane tauchers per institution : tenth round 18 + 6.5. Average number of students and teachers per inatitution ; twolth round 10 6.6: Average numbor of atudenta pee teach by typo of dueational institution: tenth round 7 a s : ee 6.7 + Average numbor of staonta por toachae by typ of educational institution : twelfth round ss fo 0.8 + Porwontage of villages having medical practitioners by eatogory and by rounds : ‘tonth and twelfth ronnds - f . ‘ 20 ;THE NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY TENTH TO TWELFTH ROUND DECEMBER 1955—AUGUST 1957 NUMBER 45 REPORT ON INDIAN VILLAGES (A STUDY OF SOME SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS) This report entitled “Indian Villages (A Study of some Social and Heonomic Aspects), Tenth to Twelfth Round, December 1955-August 1957” was prepared by the Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta and is being published in the form in which it was submitted to the Government of India and Government are not responsible for the views expressed in the report.* Cuarren Oxe INTRODUCTION 1. For an adequate study of the rural sector of a country and for any realistic planning for rural development, collection of facts from the village house- holds bearing on certain sociological aspects is not enough. Such information has to be supplemented by statisties pertaining to the villages as a whole. Thus village statistics have an important role to play in any rural planning. The household ‘enquiries reflect the demographie and economic aspects of the population while the village enquiries unfold the real village standards measured against social, cultural and environmental scales. ‘The distance of a village from the nearest administrative or communication centres, its nearness from the medical or edueational centres, the condition of its communication links with the adjoining areas and the urban places, facilities of quick transport, the frequency of the cultural, social and religious evente happening within or near the village are all fit subjects of study for properly assessing the so-called village standards, 1.2. Tho National Sample Survey (NSS) has been collecting almost from its very inception village statisties along with a number of household enquiries, In ‘the earlier rounds the collection was done in an exploratory spirit, since the survey was multi-purpose, one of its main purposes being the collection of socio-economic data of the households. The present report, which brings together the data collected © Tho draft report (No. D, 67) was submitted to the Government of India in March 1960. 1National Sample Survey during the tenth, eleventh and twelfth rounds of the NSS (December 1955 to August 1057) is the first serious attempt to present some important statistical aspects of the village character on an oll-India basis. The smallness of the sample size is however a serious handicap to breaking down some of the statistics into further divisions. Interesting though such breakdowns would be, they would not be dependable. 1.8. Much of the data which have been collected, such as the distance of the village from the nearest important centres was obtained from the village headman or other knowledgeable persons. While it is admitted that it was not possible to apply. physical method for collecting such data, it should be remembered that the village headman with his long experience was the person who would he conversant with such facts as were asked of him. The estimates built up from the three consecutive Tounds have been, as will be seen in the report, found to be fairly consistent and as such the results may generally be taken as broadly indicative of the dimensions of the difforent estimates in rural India and may be accepted as dependable for all Practical purposes. ‘The number of samples upon which the results of this report are based were 1584 for the tenth round, 1788 for the eleventh round and 1794 for the twelfth round. A few of the sample villages in each round had to be treated as casualties. 14, Tt may be mentioned that all items of information collected during the three rounds, tenth to twelfth, were not common to all the rounds although ‘most of them were. The reader would therefore find some gaps in respect of certain items in certain rounds and in all such cases it would mean that the items were not covered in that particular round. ‘The facsimile of schedules canvassed in three rounds is appended in Appendix IT of this report. Drsion o¥ THe suRVEYS 1.5. Type of sampling : The design of the surveys did not undergo any change from the tenth to the twelfth round. A two-stage stratified design was followed in all the rounds, the villages forming the first stage units and the households within the selected villages forming the sccond. 1.6. Basis of stratification : (i) Tenth round: ‘The entire rural area of the Indian Union including Jammu and Kashmir but excluding Sikkim, Andaman and ‘Nicober Islands was divided into a number of strata comprising a district or @ group of geographically contiguous districts within the same natural division. (i) Bleventh and teelfth round : The whole of rural India, as covered in the tenth round was divided into 39 NSS-ALE Zones of Agricultural Labour Enquiry 1950-51. ‘The NSS-ALE zones wero divided into a number of ultimate strata such that each such stratum was approximately homogeneous with respect to the propor- mn of agricultural labourers to total rural population and that the total rural Population content in the different strata was approximately the same, ‘The ultimate strata so formed were generally groups of districts. AReport on Indian Villages (iii) Number of strata formed in the tenth, eleventh and twelfth rounds were 266, 72 and 72 respectively. 1.1. Basia of allocation : (i) Tenth round ; Out of a total of 1624 sample villages, 80 were allocated to Jammu and Kashmir and the rest were allocated to different strata in proportion to their respective non-agricultural population, with the restriction that the allocated numbers were adjusted to make them multiples of 4. (ii) Bleventh and twelfth round: 1848 sample villages of each round were allocated to the different strata in proportion to the respective rural population with the restriction that each contained a multiple of 24 villages. 1.8. Basis of first stage sample selection : In all the three rounds the required. number of sample villages were selected from each stratum with probability pro- portional to 1951 census population and with replacement. 1.9. Out of a total of over 560,000 villages in India the sample sizes in the tenth, eleventh and twelfth round were 1624, 1848 and 1848 respectively, and ‘since the sample villages were selected with probability proportional to their popula tions, the number of sample villages per one thousand villages increased with the size- class of the ‘villages out of which they were selected. When the village population was {500 or loss the selected number was a little more than one per thousand and as the size of the village increased to 1500 or so the number selected grew to a little more than 7 villages per thousand. ‘The maximum number was 20 villages per thousand when the size class of population was more than 2000. 1.9.1 Procedure of estimation—for any one half-sample defining the symbols ¥ = estimated total of any characteristics, a ‘estimated total of that characteristics for the i-th stratum fi 8), nm, = number of sample villages in the i-th stratum, Pg = probability of selection of the j-th sample village in the i-th stratum (j = 12, ane = value of the characteristies for the j-th sample village of the i-th stratum, = total number of strata ‘the estimated total of any characteristics for rural India is, A es > . ¥ tay h=> oe Pit at cat oe ‘This procedure “gives the two independent half-sample estimates. The arithmetic average of these two half-samples gives the pooled estimate for rural areas of IndiaCuarrer Two DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES ACCORDING TO SIZE CLASS OF POPULATION: Indian villages have a very wide dispersion with regard to their popu lation and area. Some villages are thickly populated while the density is very thin in respect of others. ‘The variation in the magnitude of population in the villages, depends largely on various socio-economic and geographical factors. 2.2. An attempt has been made here to pick up from the 1951 Census tables figures showing the distribution of villages by their sizes according to the village Population, and then to compare it with a similar distribution estimated from the samples of the tenth, eleventh and twelfth round of NSS. ‘The Census of 1951 volume 1 Part ITA (Demographic tables) contains Table No. ATIT showing composite pattern of distribution of villages and towns together under some broad size classes, ‘The number of towns against these size classes separately given in the Table ATV was eliminated from the combined figure of towns and villages, and after some minor adjustments, a table showing the distribution exclusively of tho villages arrived at. The result together with the sample estimates of the tenth, eleventh and twelfth rounds is given in Tablo (2.1). The close agreement between the sample dist bution and the population distribution should be noticed, TABLE (2.1): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY SIZE CLASS OP POPULATION : TENTH TO TWELFTH ROUND ‘all Tnaiat ee size class of | ‘Percentage of villages in He acl ‘tenth loventh twelfth consus 1951 wD @ @ © o 1. upto 500 on 79 ora 68.09 2 501-1000 21a 19.42 18.7 18.69 3. 10012000 0.34 9.10 9.49 9.26 4 above—2000 5.04 4.25 46 3.06 ee 5. total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 ee 8. number of sample villages 1469 1092 1596 ‘Jammu and Kashmir have boon excluded to make the figures comparable with the conaus figures,Report on Indian Villages 2.3, The census classification shown above is rather broad. Further breakdowns are necessary for bringing out many of the characteristies of the dis- tribution pattern in the lower and upper population size classes. The smallest size class, i.e. up to 500 comprises 68 per cent of the total villages. Tn Table (2.2) which gives the percentage distribution of tenth, eleventh and twelfth round data, this smallest size class has been split up into several small groups giving a better appre ciation of the dimension of the proportion of villages under small size classes of population. ‘TABLE (2.2): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY SIZB CLASS OF POPULATION : ‘TENTH TO TWELFTH ROUND Bee =e seu em oe a Mea A Seen ch tema errors Be hil sis So OUD acta) aes ae negate 2 Hospital 422 2.67 2.78 28.79 44.28 47.07 6,78 98.27 7.38 3 high schoo! 3.62 2.72 2.58 8.01 45.77 42.28 ar.ue 25.08 94.01 CG telngreph often 8.44 2.08 3.18). 90.01. “$7.88 48.00. “stla7 aa.ne. 96,90 Se SaRveny soe 6 AGREE 5.9 eg RED? spoT! 2 sah ta hag, 6. aistrot head. aqwacters Ee MesUal Oy ie Bek barrea Nee ae mide gis aReport on Indian Villages TABLE (6.2) (Contd.): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY MODE OF CON- VEYANCE MAINLY USED TO REACH SOME DISTANT CENTRES AND BY ROUNDS ; ‘TENTH TO TWELFTH ROUND all Indio ‘mods of canvayans ‘not known ‘tal “oa eon Tie 12h 0 @) 3) 2) 23) eo) Coa 1. polio station 0.23. 0.50 = 100.00 100,00 Z 2. hospital 1.35 oat 1a 100.00 100,00 100.00 8. high school 2.08 1.35 1s 100.00 100,00 100,00 4. talogeaph office 6.3 0.44 0.38 100.00 100.00 100.00 5. railway station Lats 209) _ 100.00 190.00 = 6, distriot houd- quarters 0.48: 0.95 = 100.00 100,00 - 7. number of samples 1584 1788 1794 villages‘warren Six SOCIAL, EDUCATIONAL AND MEDICAL SERVICES 6.1, In contrast to town life, the village life in India, it is well known suffers from the lack of social, educational and modical services. Firstly, theso services are not within the easy reach of the village and a description of the distances of import- ant institutions from rural areas has been given in Chapter Four. 6.2. Secondly, whatever services are available to the villagers even when they are far away from the villages, may not be adequate and a description of the adequacy of such services is provided for in the present chapter. 6.3. Social services: In the eleventh and twelfth round some information ‘on the availability of such services ax Radio, Weekly or Daily Newspaper and Library and on the oecurance of fairs in the village was collected. ‘These factors are indica- tive of the cultural standards of the rural India, Particulars relating to this subject ‘as were collected in the eleventh and twelfth round are given in the following table (6.1). As regards village fairs, it may be thentioned, that no clear-cut definition of fair was given at the time of the collection of data and it was understood that the investigator would be guided by the common parlance of the word. ‘The figures given in the table against village fair should therefore be read in that spirit. TABLE (6.1): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY SOURCE OF SOCIAL AND EDUCATIVE SERVICES ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH ROUNDS ll Tnaia ‘ereentage of villages a ‘loventh tel o @ ® 1. radio 1165 14.35 2. weekly oF daily newspaper 19.46 19.17 3. library 1.15 0.89 4. village fae (ctigions) 64.70 65.06 6, village fair (non-religious) 6.25 6, villag far (mixed) 7.9 6.4, Teappears from these figures that nearly a fifth of the villages have weekly or daily newspaper coming into the villages, the rest being without. any newspaper Racdios are available in about twelve to fourteen per cent of the villages. ‘The number of villages holding fair of any kind expressed as percentage of the total number of villages in India is around 80 per cent of which about 65 per cent are religious fairs. 16Report on Indian Villages 6.5. Educational services : The data collected on the details of educational facilities available to villagers in India relate to tenth and twelfth round of NSS, as there was no such data collected during the eleventh round. It so happened that in some cases the investigation time of the village schedule synchronised with ‘the vacation time of the school and in such an event information regarding the type of school, the number-of teachers and the number of students could not be collected in respect of such schools, ‘There was some other difficulty too. ‘The middle schools and the upper primary schools were considered separately and independently in the tenth round whereas the existence of either of the two or both in a village ‘was considered only once in the twelfth round survey. ‘The estimates prepared for ‘these two categories of schools in the tenth round are not therefore comparable against the estimates prepared ftom those of the twelfth round. Even with these limitations and inspite of the difficulties associated with the collection of this data in a proper way, the information was collected and tabulated as it was thought that it would throw a good deal of light on the situation of educational institutions in rural India, 6.6. Tn the following table (6.2) the percentage of villages availing edueational facilities through different: types of institutions have been shown. Villages having ‘more than one type of institution have been eonsidered separately for each and have not been treated as mutually exclusive. ‘The results are presented by half samples. Tt may be noted that the results of the twelfth round show a considerable inorense in lower primary and other type of institutions which may mean increased facilities during that period of primary education and other types of education such as basic, vocational trainings, ete. TABLE (62): PERCENTAGE OF VILLAGES BY TYPE OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ‘TENTH AND TWELFTH ROUNDS all Indio —_—_— ‘peroontago of villages in fa aa ene eee Pe type of institutions “enh ‘pwalfth head hee ‘comb, hat hae om, o @ ® @ o © @ 1, high school 1.08 0.82 0.98 0.89) 132 Lun 2, middle school 2.95 aa 3.03) : 8.80, 8.20 8.04 ee fest > itt. 1egn, nae 4. lower primary 92,55 97.20 99.01 3166 a5.Al 86.08 5, other typos 2.00 2. 2.07 3.39 3.30 3.39 uvNational Sample Survey 6.7. ‘The breakdown of the estimated figures shown in columns (4) and (7) in Table (0.2) under the heads Government, aided and private categories are pre- sented in the Table (6.3). From these figures it appears that from tenth round to twelfth round @ marked increase had taken place in the percentage of villages possess- ing Government institutions. TABLE (6): PERCENTAGE OF VILLAGES BY TYPE AND CATEGORY OF EDUCATIONAL. INSTITUTIONS: TENTH AND TWELFTH ROUNDS I India -).) perwentage of villages type of institution tenths z government aided priva o ® @ @ e © @ 1. igh school 1821 OL —«17.05 2 ase. 2, midale school 42.06 30.01 18.05; 64.00 a8. 7.40 3. upper primary 6426 30.81 5.48, 4, lowee primary 55.02 20.18 15.20 62.40 aLoT 6.58 5. othors 20 15.98 08.87 284218 6.7, Overerowding in schools and insufficiency of teachers are still a problem in the field of education, ‘Tables (6.4) and (6.5) show the average number of students and teachers by type of educational institutions respectively for tonth and twelfth rounds of NSS. The results are presented by half-samples and are found to have a fair agreement. TABLE (6.4): AVERAGE NUMBER OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS PER INSTITUTION: ENTH ROUND all India: rural average number of ay a eek NaS SEEN ey @ Aeiaass nw o@ ce a a ST 2: idl oot sat. tan a0 ae ae Seeger leary tetane |eertiie agai 20 asa Bias pre 13.08. -at.60, tras bik ipl 18Report on Indian Villages ‘TABLE (0.5): AVERAGE NUMBER OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS PER INSTITUTION: ‘TWELVTH ROUND al Tia: rural mage number of ee typo of institution tadonta ‘washers ret a2 ‘comb. hast had combs @ ® © o © © o “1. high sehool 297.82 219.78 260.05 10.56 10.64 10.61 emmey PT aes ads 10.20 Pr ee ee) 8. lower primary oost 80,00 18.51 2.11 2.40 2.25 4. other types sol 37.75 38.08 1.28 2.04 1.63 6.9. In Table (6.6) and (6.7) the average number of students per teacher by type of institution have been presented by half-samples for tenth and twelfth rounds respectively. 6.10, Tho figures given in Tables (6.4) to (6.7) reveal that the number of students and teachers per institution was nearly four to five times as many in the high schools as they were in the lower primary schools, there being a little more than 2 teachers and about 60 students in each of the lower primary schools and about: 10 teachers and between 260 to 200 students in ench of the high schools. The studlent- teacher ratio is observed to be very roughly around the figure thirty, that is, 30 students per teacher in any kind of school attended by village boys and girls. 6.11. In conclusion it may be pointed out that the interval between tonth and twelfth rounds is about 1-2 years and the results presented in different tables in this section would only indicate a dimensional idea of the actual situation and the results should be used with some caution and with limitations mentioned in earlier chapters. ‘TABLE (0.6); AVERAGE NUMBER OF STUDENTS PER TEACHER BY TYPE OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION : ‘TENTH ROUND all India: rural ‘rerage number of student por toachor ‘ype of institution hal he® ob, a & @ © Thigh echoot on78 aot 23.00 2, mide school 24.88 26.94 25.64 8, upper primary 33.60 31.80 22.65, 4, lower primary 31.82 21.08 2, 5, other types 24.12 21.50 22.08 Ae CE Re wy. National Sample Survey ‘TABLE (0.2): AVERAGE NUMBER OF STUDENTS FER ‘MACHER BY TYPE OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION : ‘TWELPTA ROUND all India: rural ‘average number of sidenta per tearhor of institution, type hal had comb, 1. igh soho! 2.8 85Te 2m 2. midale or uppor primary 20.02 32.60 30.70 3, lower primary 31.79 33.86 32.84 4. other types 23,68 18.96 20,81 5 all types ana 2 at 6.8. Medical services: The unfortunate luck of qualified physicians in India in relation to its vast population is well known. Tt is also generally believed that the distribution of the doctors. over the different states is extermely uneven and when the distribution is looked at as between the rural and urban India the picture seems to be that whilst the vast majority of the Indian people live in villages, the distribution of qualified doctors as between the rural and urban India is just the inverse of the distribution of the people as between these two sectors 6.10, In the tenth and twelfth rounds of NSS certain informations with regard to medical practitioners were collected in the village schedule. An estimate has been Prepared showing the percentages of villages possessing the facility of qualified allopaths cither M.B.B.S. or Licentiate. Besides allopaths, percentage of villages having homeopaths or ayurvedic practitioners have also been propared and given in Table (6.8). Tt may be mentioned that for the purpose of caleulation of the percen- tages, any village possessing moro than one category of medical practitioner was counted as many times as there were categories. ‘Thus a village containing allo- path(s) as well as homeopath(s) appeared twice in calculation—once as a villago with an allopath and next as a villagd with a homeopath. TABLE (6.3): PERCENTAGE OF VILLAGES HAVING MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS BY CATEGORY AND BY ROUNDS: TENTH AND TWELFTH ROUNDS al Tada orconlage of villages in te ‘prctitioners eatogory ‘wath ‘erst ied had ‘om, eed hae ‘comb, o @ @ @ © © @ 1, allopatha 16 2.75 3.27 2.5 2.00 2.10 2 hompopaths 22 2.90 2.92 2.81 2a7 249 4.90 5.48 5.91 3.00 4.69 45, 4. others 4.38 5.31 4.86 6.08 5.76 5.00 20Report on Indian Villages 6.12, A rough calculation could be made from the information available in the above Table (6.8) regarding the ratio of such villages which have doctor or doctors in them (may bo termed doctor-villages for convenience) to the total number of villages in India, If the villages which fall within a radius of two miles or s0 from the sub- divisional town and district headquarter and which may be assumed to be availing of medical services from the physicians practising in the neighbouring urban area, ‘are left out of the calculation, there will remain approximately 5.5 lakhs villages needing medical services from the doctor-villages. Taking into consideration the average percentage of such doctor-villages obtained from the tenth and twelfth round data, there are according to Table (6.8) 2.2 per cent or roughly 12000 villages having Allopath practitioners, 2.7 per cent or roughly 15000 villages having Homeo- pathic practitioners and 4.7 per eent or about 27000 villages having Ayurvedic phy- sicians, ‘The ratio on the basis of the above figures seems to be one Allopath doctor- village for each 45 villages or about 23,000 villagers in India, For Homeopathic and Ayurvedic practitioners, the ratio would be one doctor-village for each 36 villages or about, 19,000 village dwellers, and one doctor-village for each 21 villages or about 11,000 villagers respectively. Tt may be pointed out that neither in the tenth nor in the twelfth round schedules, provision for detailed information with regard to Homeo- pathic and Ayurvedic practitioners was made. It is quite likely thot some practitioners ‘of these two categories who are not registered as such but are locally recognised as practising Homeopathic or Ayurvedic doctors, have been ineluded in the schedules. aAvpaxorx T COMPARISON OF HALF-SAMPLE RESULTS: TABLES Pace ‘Tamtx 1: Porcontago distribution of villages by distance in miles from nearest important edinea- ton, communication, health and administrative centros by half-samples tenth round. 29 2+ Poroontago distribution of villages by distance in miles from nearest important educa. tion, communiestion, henlth and administrative contses by half-snmplos eleventh round i # 5 3+ Percentage distribution of villages by distance in miles from noarest important edo: tion, communication, health and administrative contres by half-samplos: twelfth round 7 44 Poreentagn disteibution of vilagos by distance in miles from nearest important education, communication, health and administrative centres : tenth to twelfth round 2 5+ Cumulative percentage distribution of villages by distanco in miles from nearest ‘important education, communication, health and administrative centres: tenth 10 ‘woltth round. : - ; ; , 3 + Poreontage distribution of villages by road-condition from nearest education, communi cation, Health and administrative contres with their avorege distance in miles by half samples: tenth round ‘ 33 Pevoontago distribution of villages by rowd condition from nearest edacation, commani- ation, health and adininistativo oontren with thoir average distance ia miles by hall. samples: cloventh round. . A = 8 8+ Reroontage disteibution of villages by road condition from nearest education, communi. cation, health and administrative contres with thoir avornge distance in milos by half. ssamplos + twolfth vound CG Pa 9: Avernge distance in mila from villages to some nearest important centro by sine-clas of population by half-samplo eleventh and twelfth rounds. ea 22,‘TABLE (1): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANOD IN MILES YROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES : TENTH ROUND Ere ‘Percontage of villages from nearest istenco primary school ‘middle schoo! high sohoot ‘post office ‘elogeeph office Hospital in'milos fal hed comb; hal ba? comb, hel haf comb hell had comb, hed he? comb. het had combs patel @ wo ® me) oo am) a) 8) as) Gt) cas) a8) 1 0 “Hos 98.10 90,02 5.16 9.1 9.98 1.23 0.89 1.03 7.76 7.28 7.52 0.72 0.98 0.55 1.2 1.36 1.30 ao. 27.78 52.77 30.28 13.42 11.60 4.16 3.50 9.83 1414 12.56 15.36 2.03 2.11 2.07 “5.01 9.67 4.05 a 2 17.19 12.22 14.78 18.00 16.05 17.08 8.81 11.80 10.20 29,40 26.43 24.69 6.50 7.89 7.28 7.08 11.90 9.76 4 95 7.68 7.75 7.92 39.08 27.94 30,22 20.08 27.17 26.08 54.20 92.78 99.60 29.20 22.97 22.80 20.52 28.17 28.75 5. 6-10 2.40 2.00 2.60 14:95 19.98 16,78 92.25 23.61 22.01 14.90 19.90 19.84 26.48 30.61 29.54 30.52 20.02 29.79 6 11-2 0,03 0.50 0.87 7.65 8.90 7,97 91.40 91.16 41,20 3.89 4.24 4.03 25.89 22.63 24.77 16.45 17.10 16.26 a. above20 0.07 0.03 6.09 $.04 4.58 12.49 9.00 11.0 1.00 0.00 0.95 12,68 12,79 12.73 8.01 7.50 8.25 8. not, Bot blo 32.78 5.70 4.70 7.07 8.80 8.43 9.06 2.92 2,68 1.91 2.51 1,01 0.41 0.82 0-81 199 120 194 “a. total 160,60 100.00 100.00 100,00 160.00 100.00 100,00 160.00 100.00 109.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100-00 100-00) 100.00 soos woxpuy wo odyTABLE (1) (Conéd.): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCH IN MILES FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES: TENTi! ROUND atl Tain [eroontogo of villages from nearest distance poli station ‘nilway station sub divisional inteict hoadauarter ‘wbolosnle mask in'milos Toad quarvee Rat Re? “comb. hed hed comb, hal haf comb, hal a2 comb. hal haa combs @ @) ep ey) s)COSCSSC) a) Lo Ane) Cees OL Loe Gane bare OM ee ie ees 0.65 0.87 0.70 et 4.56 812 3.85 4.75 5.80 5.27 0.97 0.50 0.68 —k 0.0888 as 5. 9.96 7.86 6.5 0.95 0:85 0.98 1.23 1.100.589 0888.23 7.82 43-5 98.1 29.15 33.68 i746 16.78 17.13 6.676.876.0242 1.63.52 25.54 1.79 28.08 % O-10 20.84 38.87 34.31 20.35 17.81 10.10 ATL 16.09 15.84 OAT 7.04 6.75 25.98 27.00 20.51 6 120 16.19 15.17 15.00 20.55 81.74 81.14 98.42 31,03 1.73 17.07 20.44 9.08 29.51 10.57 21.08 Tabove 20 4.95 2.02 3.44 98.06 28.75 28.30 41.20 90.21 40.22 79.61 70.08 71.87 44.27 8. not available 0.08 0.86 0.22 1.61_1.90°1.75 2.83 4.58 9.00 0.95 0.98 0.27 LM oa.78 2.4 8. total 100.00 100.09 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00” 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00100.00 10, mymbor Singer” 760. 7051564 , . Gung ahuog pouoyoy‘TABLE (2); PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCE IN MILES FROM NBAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES ELEVENTH ROUND. sll India ‘oroontage oF villages from nears distance primary school ‘middle schoo! Thigh sehioot ost office ‘elogreph afice Towpitel inmibe Tal hed comb. hal hel comb, hal he2 comb, bal ha2 comb, hal hed comb, hal bal comb. > © ® © © © @ ® © o a) a Ga») aH G5 aH ay a am = W.82 49.00 9.48 G6 5.90 541 2.07 1,06 1,00 10.82 10.47 10.94 0.67 0.03 0.80 9.10 249 2.90 5 a4 26.00 20.80 28.49 13.40 9.08 11.50 6.04 4.78 5.07 16.95 14.20 15.02 2.89 1.79 2.98 4.1K 4.69 448 E a 2 16.71 15.87 15.79 15.61 17.74 16.67 9.66 0.69 9.08 25.30 25.57 25.43 4.57 5.89 5.21 7.85 10.90 9.11 r 4 1.65 8.42 8.08 92.40 27.56 30.00 25.20 21.01 25.47 26.44 29.45 25.95 25.99 20.74 22.88 52,00 24.60 28.97 i 5. G10 8.78 8.48 2.62 15,50 20.72 18,12 23.78 26.14 24.94 15.15 12.52 18.85 $1.58 30.21 30.90 29.54 31.18 90.34 6. 1-29 0.61 0.28 OAK 10,21 13.89 12.03 20.75 22.00 21.67 6.71 4.02 91.98 97.99 24.57 17.42 20.14 18.78 4. above?) = 2.67 1.80 2.984 11,02 12.10 11.58 0.31 0.89 0.00 14.07 13.04 18.60 6.97 5.77 6.97 8 not hdl 2.8 142 2.14 462 9.52 9.97 0.99 1.12 1.02 0.48 0.13 0.51 0.27 0.21 0.24 0.89 O12 0.35 ] wiat 100,00 100,00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 109.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100,00‘TABLE (2) (Conti.): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCE IN MILES FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES : ELEVENTH ROUND ‘all India ‘eroontage of villages from Hearst distance ‘sub-divisonal | in ma oligo station railway station tend quarter district hoadguartar metallod road hal he? comb. “hal ef comb, hel ha comb, hel hal comb, bel hed comb, o ey) eee) eee 142 O81 116 0.74 1.04 0.80 0.08 0.19 OAL ~~ ~~~ S*«S a <4. 8.02 2.14 5.38 2.05 2.60 2.92 0.850.210.8026 0.43 0.84 11.81 15,39 13.38. 28 6.08 9.18 7.02 6.81 8.80 7.8t Bat L272 0.80.8 0,87 AL 0.86 11,00 4 3-5 26.63 20.59 26.61 18.73 418 10.49 6.35, 5.AT 3.29 165 245 9.8 21.16 30.56 5. 6-10 99.98 36.02 98.01 22.46 17.51 20.00 10,03, 14.8 12.40 TAD 7.88 7.20 20.81 19.88 20.11 © 1-10 1846 19.62 19.04 19.40 19.10 10.25 28.67 29.16 98.92 18.42 20.95 10.85 «8.65 19.198 11.38 above 20° 3.0L. 4.93. 3.62 25.48 34.84 30.12 — 40.11 96,79. 98.48 74.02 69.99 “72.10 6.63. 7.78 7.1 8. not available 0.20 0.31 0.25340 1.57 2.49 11.4 13,02 12.72 0.67 0.72 0.69 2.841.85- 2.20 & total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,C0 100,00 100,00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00, 10, number ES of sample Villages” 890, $98,788 Gaang duos. jowosryewe "TABLE (8): PERCENTAGE ‘COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADM! ‘WELPTH ROUND DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCE IN MILES FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, INISTRATIVE CENTRES all India eee ‘paroontage of villages from nourest distance primary school high schoo! ost offco telograph offi in miles hal haz comb, Tal bad comb hal haz comb, bal he? comb. @ @ ® @ @ o a @ @ ao Ce) 0 483 41.07 48.08 13 1.60 1a 9.21 10.06 9.62 0.76 O88 (0.82 1 29.42 32.57 28.02 5.37 3.40 4.9819, 18.78 19.28 247 3.08 3.26 2 10.86 (0.08 «15.98 10,83. ST 8.27 25.48 20,088. 7M 4.05 5.57 ees ods 11.95 8.03 85,02 90.58 8.258.714.0087 19.98 8.87 94.19 6-0 oso | Lat 1228.00 96,28 95.07 18.68 10.08.81 8.83 30.90 28.87 6. 120 0.20 0.92 0.28 19.73 18.14 17.8 1685.88 8.72 97.68 108.4 7. above 20 42 oat oa 139 1 003° 0.4L 0.82 LAT 18,662.57 8. not svailblo 2.00 BAK 8.16 rol a8 107 0.11.89 Ot 0.38 2 total a 007 iw0.00 190.0077 To0-00 100.00 160,00 100,00 100.00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 8034 wpa wo vodTABLE (3) (Contd: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCE IN MILES FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HBALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES: TWELPTH ROUND ll adia page of ilags Rom aaanet airtance Tepid etecaay boop ieee Tactalod vod Bal had comb stad a? oom” hel gg em aha ia) aay as) 16) a7) as) a9) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) Tae 1° 10 208, em ols te aaa Sea aa sal 5. re aay 2.99 279 88 515 BAT 4.90.10 10.97 18,08, i a2 100 ser ekki sett - e ‘ S108 3200 asa 28.65 aa? thease agate fo me pe pe ee on on me ne ome ue ne & Sa” wet ther ange etna” to aa ad Tborez 6.45 6.88.08 0.85 2.7L 8 not sraiable 0.81 800 ids gma. ns 80 ea 9 teial_ 100.00 190-00 100-00 160.09 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 00.00 100.00 1w0.00 00.90 10, number He caren Siiges"” 8800s 706 ¥ ‘TABLE (4): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCE IN MILES FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HBALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES : TENTH T0 TWELFTH ROUND all India oroentage of villages from near Primary school middle schoo! ‘high achnol ‘fice telegraph fice Aistance in miles = . = cra a a a a ee as eT ae ae CLM mY o oo © © oo ® a a a as a9 aH 1:0 oe) aan ase aS Sal ~«d2OS (OD AAT «70D 0,040.82. .8R aot 30.24 20.49 26,02 11.68 11.86 -8.83 5.07 4.88 18.80 15.62 19.98 2.07 23.28 a2 14.73 15.79 15,017.08 10.29 9.68 9.27 4.80 5.83 82.74 7.8L BT 4 7.72 8.03 8.99 90.22 90.00 26.99 29.47 28.26 38.50 28.03 1.72 22.00 22.98 4.10 5. 6-10 2603.69 1.12 16.78 18,122.91 24.04 25.07 15.84 18.85 LSI 20.04 80.00 29.97 G19 0187 0.4k 0.987.071.0312 BIO TOF 40S 48RD 4.77 4.BT 8.34 1. above 20 0.03 — 0.8L 458 8.9h 1.0L 11.86 1.81 0.08 6.000.8818.73 18.88 12.67 sibiet sveliatioliig 4.70316 R18 BO 8.07, 8B, Hyon, 08, ITAL OAL 60.000 72 0.91 SEE ®. total 700.00 100-00 100.00 100.00. 100.00 100.00 100.0) 100,00 100.00 100,00 100.00 190.00 100.00 100.00 savy woxpur wo uodeyTABLE (4) (Cond): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCE IN MILES FR COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES : TENTH. ‘uamber of gamplo villagos : 10th round—1584; 11th round—1788; 12th round-—1704 |OM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, To TWELFTH ROUND. all Tac ‘poroontage of vilagea from nearoat ‘sub-divisional distriot hoa stance in miles hospital polioo station Readquartar ‘quarter motallod road 20m eh th oh Gtk ek otaeh aom h am aa a CC Le @ 1.20 2.30 1.56 0.95 «1.160.870.8001 OAT =- = 14.27 1501 Boa ABB AAR 49T. S 8.BK) B.98D BAT, BURT. 0:68: 0:08 0.02 0:86 13:88 18,08 ane BANGS PANS ORE RB FANE). Bae Tee atioa> lime.) tee Ode toe alee 4 28.75) 28.97 $1.52 98.68.~ 26.61. 917.18 10.49) 6402 BATS, sR 24S. 205k 95.11 ae) 29,79 90.34 29.48 34.91 38,01 19.10. 29.00. 12:40 6.25 7.20 20.1 18.40 6. 20. 16.26. 18.78 17.07. —15.69- 19.04 21.44 19.95-—-91:79 28.99 19.04 10,80 a1-38——t1-08 11. above 20 8.25 O37 0.60 3.44 8.62 28.39 90.12 40.22 88.43. 71.87 72.10 9.17. 4.80 8, not available A 0.95) 14g 0a 0.20 1s 2403.00 12.72 OT 0.00 2.90. rae 9, total 100.00 100.00 100.99 100.00. 100.00 100.00 100,00 100,00 100.00 100,00” 100.00 100,00 100.00 = : i : 2 é‘TABLE (5): CUMULATIVE EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCE IN MILES FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES : TENTH TO TWELPTH ROUND z arto, Poroenage of villages rom near Frinary ohool ‘nid sahoot Tigh ical pon of ‘loge oon distance inion - 2 : es Ta nee pom alia ek ot alee Stowe anak! a EEG OTOL UD) A NT MED) URIs ce aD, rar} area aS aioe, aces waa ee gL eer S| LON ae ON 1 cose tov 70,08 14.00 10.07 4.88. 7.08 8.05 o9.05 38.00 29,00 Ba, S408 2 2 cuts ss.t0f tea) adiony sa.eh | wis “in. Abs oas.77 ch.oD Wot ba.08 CSR # AS eae 4 anal 09.79 05.25 02,94 69.64 42.08 40.81 45.35 70.37 00.82 69.30 92.65 $0.78 38.04 é g5:60" GAs” u.sT 70.08 a1y7O ek.o0 Gots GORE "0th BLAT Wy.tt “aS. OLS BBA «12 pe.a1_ Hien v0.09 selon. oncm ‘ao.s8 a7.42. 67.97. W1LLA 98.00 99.60. s6.sn _a8.20._ 94.05 1, above 20 05.30 — 0.04. S1.8r 00.00. 07.32. 98.98 98.08 98.09 = 99.00 - 90.41 98.60 90.7, 00.08 ST SIC AI RGR NOT Re SL BGs L MN 0 SRL OOo OL OM TOSS total Tapio" 109-0077 Fo0.00100-c0” 200,00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.60 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00TABLE (5) (Contd): CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTI EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ION OF VILLAGES BY DISTANCE IN MILES FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES : TENTH TO TWELPTH ROUND ‘number fo sample villages: 10th round—1586; L1th roand—1788; 12th round—1794 all India ‘vcontags oF villages from noarcat fubdivisonal ~~ district head metallod road ital lie station railway station adquarter quarter stance in miles cae = ae = ats Tod Meh Aah tom” ome aoe th tom Lan ae w oy 09) yaa) 0 ASR SOL AT BOR 0.95.1 Tahae 5 Oat a, OI e CON), (ORY WES G'S giar aT Sou 5.85 6.78 5.53 4.00 454 = 88.81 0.80 0.08 0.02 0.34 eo e718 a8 W.61 15.89 "18.80 19.66 12-48 19.49 11.65 1.90 2.30. 0.85.7 6.00. 90.88 4 3-6 “430 44.96 W589 46.34 0.07 n0.02 28.708 8.07 ae 0.08.00 5% e40 "415 74.60 74.94 90.65 77.08 48.7 48.14 24.96 10.00 8.82 10.96 79.25 89.15 6. 1120 M041 98.98 91.91, 96.34 96.12 40.86’ 67.00 Guloe 48.88 7.868 7-31 00.68. 41°78 7. above 20 $8.06 99.75 08.67 90.78 09.74 98.25 97.51 96.31 87.28 90.78 90.81 07.80 98.88 8. not available 1th SORE IMSS P08 0 ae ae, wae at ee wane tas 9. total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.60 100.00 100,00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 "100.00 - « Grung. aydung. poucssoye‘TABLE (6): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY ROAD CONDITION FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COA MUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES WITH THRIR AVERAGE DISTANOE IN MILES : TENTH ROUND all Inais ‘eroontago of villages From nearest conttion of primary behoot ridale achoot Thigh schoot ‘ost office telegraph ofico connecting — Thad comb, bel hed comb. had he@ comb. hel hed comb. hal hag comb. bel com a oo © 8 © m & a ap as as a) a8) 0) a) da) ad) 1, within Tre, 10k 38.16 99.62 9.16 8.51 9.98 1.93 0.82 1.08 7.76 7.28 7.02 0.72 0.38 0.55 1.24 1.80 1.80 ‘2 foot track $8.31 34.25 38.77 37.26 85.49 90.95 22.20 24.09 29.13 11.41 41.00 41.22 21.40 20.22 20.85 26.88 28.07 27.91 98, s anmotallod 14.45 14,92 14.08 21,61 25.47 28.52 19.45 29.00 21.01 24.80 27.73 20.29 18.99 29.52 20.00 20.56 25.29 22.87 4. metallod «2194 “1.92 2.13 6.89 6.87 6.62 7.40 8.06 8.22 5.02 5.07 5.93 8.18 9.81 8.09 8.40 9.22 8.88 sien worpyy wo node 5. other Cine ions 8.08 4.70 4,92 29.63 19.68 21.67 46.59 41,97 43.98 10.60 16.82 17.77 90.87 49,80 48.90 41.44 38.94 97.74 6. not ROL able 8,82 8.06 4.88 7.97 9.04 8,50 8.04 2.99 2.68 1,32 2.52 1.91 0.41 0.92 0.31 142 1.28 1.85 Fotoial’ 100.00 100,00 100-00 100-00 100-00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 190,00 100,00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 %. average ‘ieeanoo Siete Lge 1.90 1.29 LT 6.75 6,2 11.27- 9,80 10.64 14 3:86 4,00 11.97 11.01 11.40 9.13 8.86 8.00 1 Inclados villages having eentees within tho boundary or at a distance of los than half miTABLE (6) (Contd.); PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY ROAD CONDITION PROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES WITH THEIR AVERAGE DISTANCE IN MILES ; TENTH ROUND. allTndia ‘pereontagn of wllages from neat ‘condition of istrict ‘eonnceting road station railway station Irendquartor hed hel comb, hal had 1 ha? comb. @ ee ) ey) 1, within village 1,100.74 0.88 0.87 = 2. foot track. 29.84 92.51 31.65 19.02 20.54 90.98 8.337.937.8418 4.50 4.8 99.94 2,07 2.1 8, unmetatled 24.09 25.98 26.78 16,60 10,00 18.28 10.60 14.78 12.71 4.95 6.81 5.62 19.98 20.27 20.12 4. motalled S08 8.82 8.49 9.40 10.01 9.71 0.19 11.78 10.A7 12.78 12.47 19.08 7.91 9.18 8.01 5. other conditions 26.80 31.16 84.01 51.50 46.78 49.18 68.65. 51.59 65.19 77.51 76.24 76.80 48.02 43.78 45.92 6. not available 0.08 0.88 0.28 1.61 1.90 1.75 2.90 458 9,780.58 0.30048 1d. a8 7. total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 190.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100,00 100.00 100.00 1 average distance in miles 7.00 7.47 7.58 21.80 19.58 20.45 29.00 92.64 29.82 38.63 39.80 99.21 12.38 ‘9. umber of sample illages 7397051586 ‘Includes villages having eontres within tho boundary or at a distance of less than half « mile, Gains aydueny. pouowoyeTABLE (1): ‘COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES WITH THEIR. AVERAGH DISTANCE IN MILES : ELEVENTH ROUND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY ROAD CONDITION FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, al Tai a ———————__— ‘Persontage of lllages from nearest condition of primary school middle shoot school owt elon ‘elegraph office hospital Soul = “hed be comb. hal hed comb. be comb, hal hs® comb. sl he® comb. hal has comb. o o © © © © © © © a9 ay ag ay) 2H 0s) a6 07 cs) a9) i win He, 43.22 49.60 49.48 5.53 5.20 5.41 2.03 1.96 1.99 10.92 10.47 10.94 0.67 0.08 0.89 2:19 242 2.90 2. foot track $1.90 $4.78 99.38 85.19 98,89 97.00 29.08 24.85 24.41 30.31 44.41 41.85 19.08 22,84 21.24 29.94 91,19 30.20 & 3. unmetalled 14.00 15.82 14.95 28.33 25.07 24.19 23,22 20.69 21.97 25.00 24.08 24.79 22.49 20.94 21.42 22.58 22.05 22.61 A, motalled = «1.80 1.88 1.50 6.27 5.47 5,87 8.06 7.74 8.2L 5.10 4.02 5.0L 9.27 8.58 8.08 B43 7.90 7.87 5.08 2,79 4.44 25.00 91.68 29.93 41,12 45.25 42.17 19.83 15.10 17.48 47.09 37.02 36.00, 36.52 2.83 1.07 2.21 4.08 3.71 4.20 0,09 1.61 1.25 0.48 0.52 0.50 0.87 0.01 0.44 0.44 0.50 0.47 7. total [iv bo Io0-60 100,00 100.00 100-60 190,60 100.00 100.60 160.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100-00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 %, average ‘stance Aistance 53 1.36 1.95 5.53 5.86 5.70 9.92 10,56 10.24 3.49 4.13 3.81 11.51 11.53 11.02 8.71 8.95 8.88 ‘neludos villages having centro within the boundary or at » distance of lo than balf a mile, seBoya wonpuy wo odyoe TABLE (7) (Contd): PERCENTAGE DISERIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY ROAD CONDITION FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES WITH THEIR AVERAGE DISTANCE IN MILES : ELEVENTH ROUND Ina ee ee [Deroontage of villagen from nearvet condition of sub avisional ‘connesting road police station railway station Ineadquarter Aistriot headquarter smetalled road hal be comb. hel he? comb. bsl he2 comb, hal hs comb. hel hea comb, @ eo eng) ee) es) CSC) awiayiegey ad) 0 116 00d 18 om oe sae on = se St em ee ay 2, foot track 28.81 98.79 90.49 19.55 22.03 20.78.45 1.68 10,044.72 51k 4.92 $4.46 40.97 97.060 3. unmotaled 25.81 22.00 24.01 17.83 16.62 16.98 10.80 11.70 19.99 4.10 6.49 5.29 32.70 90.44 31.88 4. motalled i a ce ce eX 5, other conditions 97.18 95.18 96.15 60.53 50.04 50.76 61.71 54.64 58.20 81.85 78.08 79.70 19.29 15.24 14.96 6, not available 0.90 0.70 0.50 3.401.968 8.09 12.60 14.38 110,99 2.84 1.55 — 2.20 7, total 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.60 104.00 100.00 100,00" 100.00 100.00 1W.00 100.00 100.00 '. avornge distanco a in mils TM 8.87 8.15 18.56 21.89 20.98 28.35 92.54 22.94 98.31 38.98 38.92 6.00 7.42 6.08 9. number of sample illagee 800 5081788 MInohudes villages having contres within the boundary or at a distanco of les than half a mito, Gams. dung. youonnye‘TAREE (6): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY ROAD CONDITION FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COM- MUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES WITH THEIR AVERAGE DISTANCE IN MILES: TWELFTH ROUND soo worpuy uo ode all Inia ‘percontage of rilngos from nearest comaiion of primary abhool ‘high sohool ost else telegraph ofioo hat comb, hal had comb, had he@ comb. hal bad comb. o @ © o @ o oO @ a apa) L within village! 44.83 4107 48.04 100 LAT 1.000.680.7688. 2, foot track 32.38 31.70 52.08 28.07 22.09 28.02 37.29 38,10 18.59 20.70 19.65, 8. unmetatioa W414 16.46 15.81 22.64 24.05 88.BL 27.58 28.90 8.75 82.8G 2403 88.20 4: motallod, 118-3050 226.8) Te TS 4.78.8 7.88 8G 5, other conditions 4.55.91 449 4.66. 98.90 AT. 18,05 15.90 17.48 0.9542. 6.82 6, not available 0a Ba maT se a aT ot = 9.6 oe 0.38 7 total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 190,00 100,00 100.00 100.00 8. avorage distance in' miles 1.29 1.20 1.98 9.58 10.48 10.02 8287088781086 LT MInckudes villages having eontres within the boundary or ata distancs of loss than half a mil,8 TABLE (6) (Contd.): PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES BY ROAD CONDITION FROM NEAREST IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRES WITH THEIR AVERAGE DISTANCE IN MILES: TWELTH ROUND all India ee eee [poveontago of vlages from nearest onion of hospital vetarinary hospital ‘manure and wood store ‘motalled road fonneoting ro hed comb, hal hs comb hal had comb. hal he® comb, a aya as) 1, within vilages 1s 16050003 S«dO)SC«dTBSCO «ASAT 2, foot track. 2440 24.98 24.59 19.97 98.03 0.80 20.66 81.50 21.00 35,83 8498.88 3. unmotaled 24.39 27.70 96.08 19.74 28.40.58 9.58 4.78 2173.04 98.05 36,38 4. metalled T18 10.43 8.827.070.6808 a = 5 other condition 41.73. 33.85 97.77 40.40 50.48 42.01 27.09 «24.08 95.64 4.01.89 13.25 6. not available O81 2.08143 6.503.807.8818. 1.00 |g 1a 7. total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00.” 100.00 ‘8. average distanoo fs in miles S55. 8.62 8.58 1s aT asl e877. 9, umber of ample 2 = villages seo 90508 ‘Includes villages having contros within the boundary or at a distanco of lese then half a mile, . Gong ndurg ouryoye‘TABLE (0): AVERAGE DISTANCE IN MILES FROM VILLAGES TO SOME IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION AND HEALTH CENTRES RY SIZE OLASS OF POPULATION: ELEVENTH AND TWELPTHT ROUND a Tain | ed i ee EE eee ae vane srenge dlotence i ies rm eyeeel Ugh pcioal | population case ie eS sloventh twelfth Soveath wal iat Trait Tal hat) em ha idk EEC CRA oom Rade bas ee = @ @ ee em wa aS SL wpw2m 5.57 50.00 2.05 82s L.ar 1.86026. 12.95 1.5.8.0 20am a.) IEE 108 AB 88 1.20 10.18 a0 10.59 8.8.88 2 501-1000 19.ck 18.75 osy 0.80.8 ome ert 8k 88 88H ? 4. 1001-2000 fas 0.0002 0.88 0. Oth 088 SLO THR OTB. 5. 2001 and above 4.23 4.50 0.880.560.4830.) OSL O22 GOA. 8.00.78 all laaios 100.00 100,001.88 1.96 1.95 1.20 (1.20 1.28 9.92 10.56 10.24 9.58 10.45 10.08 1 mumber of Sate ee ee eeTABLE (0) (Contd,): AVERAGE DISTANCE IN MILES FROM VILLAGES TO SOME IMPORTANT EDUCATION, COMMUNICATION AND HEALTH CENTRES BY SIZE CLASS OF POPULATION: ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH ROUND sll Tain coontage of illages averago distancs in miles from hospital oat ion “Yelograph offen population class ‘ zs : rap eleventh tweinth —_ eloventh ‘eet ‘laventh ‘olf ‘loventhy ‘rel Ral had comb, bad he2 comb. hel he2 comb, hel had comb, hal hs comb: hed had comb: w @ a9 a7 089) 09 em 2) BH >) 2H 2D GH) eH GO GD 8) GB) 33.87 33.00 10.18 9.54 0.83 10,06 9.55 9.80 4.70 5.49 5.13 4,89 4.88 4.79 19.61 19.28 13,40 19.88 19.03 13.46 83.59 34.12 6.61 0.68 9.00 7.73 8.11 7.02 3.29 4.08 3.65 3.16 3.25 9.20 11.71 12.12 11.90 10.97 9.80 10.42 19.54 18.75 747° 8.01 7.78 ¥.12 “8.03 -8.50 2.02 8.90 3.10 8.08 3.02 3.48 -9.94 9.67 9.50 9.74 9.91 9.80 4, 1001-2000 9.07 9.45 7.60 7.42 7.53. 7.60. 7.47 2.08 2.48 2.92 2.19 2.95 9.83 9.59 9.19 9.34 9.97 9.96 5. 2001 and above 4.25 4.59 6.77 6.58 6.05 7.00 6.04 7.14 0.63 0.77 0.70 0.60 0.51 0.56 8.05 7.77 7.01 £.00 7,09 8.00 5. allclaswoz 100.00 100.00 8.71 8.00 8.88 8.65 8.62 8.58 9.40 4.17 9,81 9.4 9.70 9.67 11,01 11,09 11,62 11,90 10.80 1L11 7. amber of scumple villages 864895 1779 882-800 1778 881_s0H! 1774 ST) 02 1781885 80H 1752 885905. 1700 + « Gains. ndues.poueeyeAvrenprx IL FACSIMILE OF THE SCHEDULES OF INVESTIGATION RURAL, ‘ORIGINAL DUPLICATE ‘GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY : 1955-56 Schedale 80: Villas Statics (Teath Round) {H)_teieaton: vamp view [_ (3) perce of irigton (1s pris on : T nati Trae oe 1 aa Coes pee 086, © mnie gata meinen | 8mm ambi 2 pg : so] tes eatin od ea (8) eee i ener (9 epee tamer, a man apa i on ae agua clagater vets re Tae a ae ey = S| ter |e o @ @ @ [ow Hees a a aaa ee 1 ge le 7 i i 7 J ik e [i r i i T feel aa = 1S SR RT ea NaS TIT RD IO ee Sie. = 5 a ea eres ener TW | wm [ace | om, accel SE pam a wo |e Beh [= | a | ET Er =| alee | 1 - f Seta = LSteateat D4 1National Sample Survey GENTRAL* ‘ORIGINAL® “STATE DUPLICATE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY : 1956-57 Schedule 3.0: Vilage Statistics sis eee (aston ate [op ewanescane [pew eccin poms uaa: aoe | ieee [teen pera. a eo eae emer no pone enna. a a ene ago ecient ia meet eects ccs ssecmenenere alee ces Soeanalies = gens eae Eee 1 pena : fmnj ae el oo fasctarrect arte &Report on Indian Villages {20} noigber of measuring units In non-hownbol etababmest ar rt | wn ee Pl aneee ere oe en fee le] ete | UN] remark by investigator 12} commenta by inapetor 43National Sample Survey CENTRAL: onicinaLe DUPLICATE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY: 1997 ‘Schedule 30, Vilage Stat RURAL (Twets Rowad) [i stesdeten ci tng” pm of renee ‘enya a ‘i Gumant Dowrma Bs) oe ates aT == a a ia ae Tae oe es onttn| Ste so eee | ar [pues 2a areal] pti = ~t ‘ta aC a alee : | i a * = = + om ou | I [ioe a! z = I SE et cts me ats ad mth at ny reel eager tame 3. tn et dine arent on ryReport on Indian Villages ; et - a = ' oa =e =i trtet RS ieee ere : re peseaas = jae | eee ‘ 4 | en atetnd by fod (acre Speer a