Correlate with Correlate Rule Distinguish
Article 100 of the 111 of the between
Revised Penal Revised Rule of Dependent Civil
Code and Criminal Action and
Procedure. Independent Civil
DEPENDENT CIVIL ACTIONS are those actions seeking civil
liability from the offender for acts which arose from the same
acts or omission subject of the criminal action.
Ex. A was accused of theft, but he was acquitted because of
his guilt had not been proved beyond reasonable doubt. B,
the offended party, can institute civil action for damages for
the same act and this time, mere preponderance of evidence
is required.
INDEPENDENT CIVIL ACTIONS are those actions which may
proceed independently of criminal actions and require only
preponderance of evidence.
Ex. These are found in Arts. 32,33, 34 and 2176 of the Civil
Code.EVIDENTIARY PROOF REQUIRED
CRIMINAL CASES - Proof beyond reasonable doubt.
(hardest to prove)
CIVIL CASES - Preponderance of Evidence
- means that the evidence presented by one side is superior
to that of the other.
ADMINISTRATIVE CASES - Substantial Evidence
-it is satisfied when there is reasonable ground to believe,
based on the evidence submitted, the respondent is
responsible for the misconduct complained of.
Under Article 100 of the Revised Penal Code: A person who
is criminally liable is also civilly liable.
Under Rule 111 of the Rules of Court
A Dependent Civil Action can be:
1. Instituted together with the criminal action;
2. Waived
3. Reserved
4. Filed Ahead
ARTICLE 29
1. If the acquittal of the accused is based on reasonable
doubt, private offended party can still file a civil action for
damages based on the same act or omission which now
requires only preponderance to establish the claim.
2. If the acquittal is based on pure innocence - the accused
cannot be made civilly liable.ARTICLE 31
- Civil obligations not arising from a criminal offense.
- It arises from some other acts such as contract based on culpa
contractual or legal obligation to return money malversed or
based on quasi-delict.
Ex. Due to the reckless imprudence of a driver of a bus company,
the bus feel off a cliff causing death and injury to passengers,
However, the driver was acquitted in the criminal case for
homicide and reckless imprudence as his guilt was not proven
beyond reasonable doubt, The passengers can file a civil case
against the bus company for the failure of the bus company to
cari its Passengers safely to its destination which is culpa
contractual.
INDEPENDENT CIVIL ACTIONS Le
Articles 32, 33, 34 and 2176 of the Civil Code.
ARTICLE 32
It provides for the imposition of damages upon any public
officer or public employee or private person , who directly or
indirectly obstructs, defeats and violates or in any manner
impedes or impairs the 19 listed rights and liberties.
ARTICLE 33 ee)
It covers three groups of offenses:
1. Defamation - covers libel (written) or slander (oral) see
Arts 355 and Art 358 of the Revised Penal Code;
2. Fraud - covers Estafa or swindling or other deceits under
Art 315, 316, 317 and 318 of the Civil Code;
3. Physical Injuries — this term is not confined to the crime of
physical injuries under Arts 262-266 of the Revised Penal
Code but covers all of physical injuries including
attempted, frustrated and consummated homicide.