Reflect on the changes in Brazil’s political system during Fernando Henrique
Cardoso’s lifetime. How has the evolution of Brazil’s political system helped the country become more prosperous and a bigger player in the global economy? 2. Consider the changes in Brazil from the perspective of a company looking at the risk level associated with investing in the country. What do companies look for when they make investment decisions? Why is it so important to a country like Brazil to have a stable and transparent political system? What impact does this have on a country’s ability to attract foreign direct investment? 3. In your opinion, why did Fernando Cardoso place such a high level of importance on developing global ties with rest of the world? Why were these ties so important to the future of Brazil? 4. What can other countries learn from Brazil? What do you think lies ahead for the country over the next decade? CASE STUDY Brazil has now become the world’s sixth largest economy, a giant energy with a booming manufacturing sector and growing middle class, in short, an economic and democratic power very much on the rise, and decidedly not the nation Fernando Henrique Cardoso was born into. Fernando Henrique Cardoso, former Brazilian President, was born in 1931. At that time, Brazil had only one paved route linking Rio with one of the province. Brazil was quite apart from the world. It was quite isolated from the core. They were considered at the periphery, the poor periphery of the world. Cardoso, now 81, would become one of the chief architects of Brazil’s rise. As both as a scholar – he was first a leading thinker on issues of race and development and has authored or co-written more than 30 books – and then as a political figure serving as the country’s finance minister and then as president for 2 terms from 1995 to 2002. He oversaw the elimination of runaway inflation, opened up markets and instituted social programs that helped lunch the country on its present path. - FHC: Why should we be to be as stagnant as an underdeveloped country? I think this is not realistic. It will be possible to promote policies to implement a better economy and to move up the Brazilian economy and to become much more part of the global system. It was this rare combination of scholar and politician that the U.S. Library of Congress cited recently in awarding Cardoso the pretigious Kluge Prize, which the Library likens to a Nobel for the Humanities and Social Sciences. And, indeed, Cardoso says he started out as a young sociologist in the 1960s with ambitious goals. - FHC: I would like to change the world, or if not the world, at least to improve the Brazilian situation. His early research helped explode myths on a subject as thorny in Brazil as in the US: Race. - FHC: The idea was officially that Brazil could be qualified as a racial democracy. Well, it was a myth. We had racial prejudice. We never had, by law, segregation, but Brazil imported 10 times more slaves than America. So we have an enormous population of black people. But the idea of democracy, racial democracy, was simultaneously a myth and an aspiration. Brazil society, they would have a more democratic kind of relationship between blacks and whites. And step by step, we are building up a more open society, a more flexible and more – also more democratic with respect to race relations. - Jeffrey Brown: The other part of your scholarship that gained you so much attention was challenging this idea that Brazil would always be a dependent nation, it would always be on the outside. What did you see that made you want to challenge that idea? - FHC: To me, it was clear that there is an enormous difference within the periphery. And countries like Brazil or Argentina or Mexico, were already becoming industrialized and they were establishing ties with global markets. I had no idea of what was really occuring, the globalization process. We have no words. - JB: So the issue is how does a country like Brazil find its way in this globalizing market? - FHC: That’s right. That was the main question. How to keep going democracy, more freedom, capacity of people to organize and also to respect contracts, to increase investment, to have good governance. Brazil’s lack of democracy, in fact, led to the turning point in Cardoso’s life. Military dictatorships forced him first into exile and then returning to Brazil to lose his academic position. By the 1970s, he had grown more politically active, eventually becoming what he likes to term “an accidental President”. Cardoso left the presidency in 2002, prevented by law from seeking a third term. Victory by Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva marked an important moment for Brazilian democracy, the first time in more than 40 years that one elected civilian president passed power to another. Lula, though leading a rival and more leftist party, kept many of Cardoso’s policies and reforms in place, as has his successor, the current president, Dilma Rousseff. Today, Cardoso sees continuing challenges and problems for his country, but also much progress. - FHC: If I look back when I remember I was a child in Rio, on Copacabana Beach, with all the hills in Rio, but also a very backward country. And now I can see much more dynamic society in Brazil. Now we have democracy. Now we have people asking for more. Now we have protests. Now we have the free press. Now we have the universities. Now we have contacts across the globe. My God, it was an enormous progress.