Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Antigone is the immortal drama which embodies the conflict between opposing points of view
and principles on several basic issues confronting all political systems.
At the core of the conflict is the issue of the nature of law and justice.
The expression of individual conscience and will conflicts with the demands of the ruler.
Antigone is a timeless drama in its discussion of the problem of disobedience by an individual of
the state and its ruler and the effect of that disobedience on the parties involved.
SOPHISTS
PLATO
Republic, the book devoted to the meaning and implementation of justice both by the individual
and the state.
Concerned himself with fundamental questions.
The Republic is a book on politics, but it is also on psychology, morality, education, and
eugenics.
Plato was critical of the accepted Athenian idea of all citizens participating in politics.
Drawing distinctions between human beings on the basis, not of their possession of material
wealth, but on what part of the soul was dominant in their character: appetite (laboring class),
courage (warrior), reason (ruler).
The good state, like the good man, possessed the characteristics of temperance, courage, wisdom,
and justice.
Plato’s society was not only ordered but structured and hierarchical.
Interrelated with the political structure was an educational system and a science of eugenics.
Plato was largely interested in the class of rulers or guardians – this group of learned ascetics was
to be a communal body.
Most important of this group were not simply rulers, they were philosophers – their reluctance to
govern was an illustration of their fitness to do so.
The Republic presented an ideal regime, the feasibility or likelihood of which was not clear.
Plato was pessimistic in his view of inevitable, progressive deterioration of government from the
starting point until the final form of tyranny.
Plato and his ideas have been a model for all succeeding utopian projects.
ARISTOTLE
The temper of Aristotle’s Politics is different from that of the Republic – it is cool, quiet,
reasonable, not so ambitious, lacking in strong enthusiasm or advocacy.
Aristotle owned the first exhaustive analysis of existing constitutions, and he thus created
political science.
Plato’s conception of change had been of degeneration from the ideal; Aristotle believed that
change was teleological, movement toward the natural, predetermined end.
Man, and state were linked together. Man was by nature a political animal who reached
perfection and became civilized as a citizen.
Aristotle was concerned with the most important topic of political inquiry, the best form of
political association or constitution.
His classification of states was determined partly by the number of rulers and partly by their aim.
His discussion of democracy is still pertinent today.
Aristotle bequeathed a great legacy to political thought but not to any one school.
His emphasis was on the need for constitutional stability for this was the great virtue of the good
polis.
Above all, Aristotle is important for his belief in the possibility of a political science, and for his
investigations of the ends of states and of the activities of men making up those states.