Professional Documents
Culture Documents
26 Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete PDF
26 Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete PDF
and Building
Abstract
The marked brittleness with low tensile strength and strain capacities of high-strength concrete (HSC) can be overcome by the
addition of steel fibers. This paper investigated the mechanical properties of high-strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete. The
properties included compressive and splitting tensile strengths, modulus of rupture, and toughness index. The steel fibers were added
at the volume fractions of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%. The compressive strength of the fiber-reinforced concrete reached a max-
imum at 1.5% volume fraction, being a 15.3% improvement over the HSC. The splitting tensile strength and modulus of rupture of
the fiber-reinforced concrete improved with increasing the volume fraction, achieving 98.3% and 126.6% improvements, respectively,
at 2.0% volume fraction. The toughness index of the fiber-reinforced concrete improved with increasing the fraction. The indexes I5 ,
I10 , and I30 registered values of 6.5, 11.8, and 20.6, respectively, at 2.0% fraction. Strength models were established to predict the
compressive and splitting tensile strengths and modulus of rupture of the fiber-reinforced concrete. The models give predictions
matching the measurements.
Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0950-0618/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.027
670 P.S. Song, S. Hwang / Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673
HSC containing 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% volume fractions then added in small amounts to avoid fiber balling and
of steel fibers, declaring that compressive and splitting to produce the concrete with uniform material consis-
tensile strengths improved to 1.0% fraction, whereas the tency and good workability. For concrete mixes with a
modulus of rupture did up to 1.5%. Eren and C ß elik [10] 2.0% volume of fibers, extra time was required for
studied the strength-producing effect of steel fibers and mixing. The freshly mix steel fiber-reinforced concrete
silica fume in HSC, indicating that the fiber volume and was placed in two equal layers into a cylinder mold to
fiber aspect ratio governed the compressive strength of cast a standard 150 300 mm cylindrical concrete
the concrete. Chunxiang and Patnaikuni [8] indicated specimen for a compressive strength test and a splitting
that the compressive strength of HSFRC increased with tensile test, and into a 150 150 530 mm beam mold
maturity, which increased 24% in the aged 76 day for a flexure strength test. Each layer was consolidated
HSFRC. According to Marar et al. [11], at each fiber using a vibrating table. At the end of 24 h after con-
aspect ratio, the compressive strength of HSFRC im- solidating, the specimen was removed from the mold
proved with the increase in fiber volume. And as far as and cured in water at 73 3 °F for 28 days. And then a
Daniel and Loukili [12] declared, the compressive strength test was performed.
strength of HSFRC held 15% advantage over its HSC
partner. The foregoing discussions indicate the steel fi- 2.3. Test methods
ber additions primarily exerting the pick-up effect on the
compressive strength. However, the additions play also The compressive strength test, performed on 15 of
devotedly in developing splitting tensile and flexural the standard test cylinders, followed ASTM C39 test
strengths. for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete speci-
This paper further investigated the strength im- mens. The cylinders were loaded, in a testing machine
proving potentials of HSFRC containing 0.5%, 1.0%, under load control, at the rate of 0.3 MPa/s until
1.5%, and 2.0% volume of hooked-end steel fibers in failure.
comparison with the plain high-strength counterpart, The splitting tensile test, run on 15 of the test cyl-
and established models predicting the behavior of inders, was in accordance with the ASTM C496 test for
HSFRC under compression, splitting tension, and splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete speci-
flexure. mens, although ACI committee 544.2R hardly recom-
mends the use of the test on fiber-reinforced concrete.
The running arose because the ratio of fiber length to
2. Experimental program cylinder diameter took a low value of 0.23 in the work
and because some investigators have shown that the
2.1. Materials ASTM C496 test is applicable to fiber-reinforced con-
crete specimen [9,13]. In the test, load applications
Type I cement, river sand with a fineness modulus of were continuous and shockless, at a constant rate
3.1, and crushed basalt of 19 mm maximum size were of 900 kPa/min splitting tensile stress until specimen
used. Silica fume used was a commercially available failure.
byproduct of the production of silicon metal and fer- The flexural strength (modulus of rupture, MOR)
rosilicon alloys, which improved concrete properties in test, conducted using 15 test beams under third-point
fresh and hardened states. To improve the workability loading, followed the ASTM C1018 test for flexural
of concrete, a high-range water-reducing admixture toughness and first-crack strength of fiber-reinforced
(superplasticizer) was employed during mixing opera- concrete. The mid-span deflection was the average of the
tions. The cement, silica fume, water, superplasticizer, ones detected by the transducers through contact with
river sand and crushed basalt of 430, 43, 133, 9, 739 and brackets attached to the beam specimen. The testing
1052 kg/m3 were used to make the HSC. The slump of machine ran to increase the deflection at a constant rate;
the concrete was 60 mm. The hooked-end steel fibers the load–deflection relation recorded using an X –Y
were made of mild carbon steel. The fibers have an av- plotter.
erage length of 35 mm, nominal diameter of 0.55 mm,
and the aspect ratio of 64. These fibers are available in
bundles of about 30 fibers, which were fibrillated with 3. Results and discussion
water-soluble glue to ensure immediate dispersion in
concrete during mixing. Table 1 presents the strength test results on HSFRC
and HSC. Each strength test result was the average for
2.2. Preparation of samples 15 test specimens. The compressive strength, splitting
tensile strength, and modulus of rupture of HSFRC
In the production of concrete, the constituent mate- improved to different extents in response to the fiber
rials were initially mixed without fibers. The fibers were volume fractions.
P.S. Song, S. Hwang / Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673 671
Table 1
Strength test results and strength-effectiveness on HSFRC and HSC
Fiber volume Compressive strength Splitting tensile strength Modulus of rupture
fraction (%)
Measured Strength- Measured Strength- Measured Strength-
(MPa) effectivenessa (%) (MPa) effectivenessa (%) (MPa) effectivenessa (%)
0 85 – 5.8 – 6.4 –
0.5 91 7.1 6.9 19.0 8.2 28.1
1.0 95 11.8 8.7 50.0 10.1 57.8
1.5 98 15.3 10.8 86.2 12.3 92.2
2.0 96 12.9 11.5 98.3 14.5 126.6
a
Strength-effectiveness ¼ HSFRC strengthHSC strength
HSC strength 100%.
90
3.2. Splitting tensile strength
Table 2
Comparison of predicted and measured values for compressive and splitting tensile strengths and modulus of rupture
Fiber volume Compressive strength Splitting tensile strength Modulus of rupture
fraction (%)
Predicted Measured Prediction Predicted Measured Prediction Predicted Measured Prediction
(MPa) (MPa) errora (%) (MPa) (MPa) Error (%) (MPa) (MPa) error (%)
0 85 85 0 5.8 5.8 0 6.4 6.4 0
0.5 91 91 0 7.3 6.9 5.80 8.2 8.2 0
1.0 95 95 0 8.8 8.7 1.15 10.2 10.1 0.99
1.5 97 98 )1.02 10.3 10.8 )4.63 12.3 12.3 0
2.0 96 96 0 11.7 11.5 1.74 14.5 14.5 0
a
Prediction error ¼ predictedmeasured
valuemeasured
value
value
100%.
672 P.S. Song, S. Hwang / Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673
12
10
Table 3
Toughness index at various fiber volume fractions
8 Fiber volume fraction (%) Toughness index
Measurements
I5 I10 I30
Predictions frf = 6.4 + 3.43Vf + 0.32Vf2
6 0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.5 3.0 4.8 8.2
1.0 3.3 6.2 12.4
Fiber volume fraction Vf (%) 1.5 4.2 8.3 17.8
2.0 6.5 11.8 20.6
Fig. 3. Effect of fiber volume on modulus of rupture.
P.S. Song, S. Hwang / Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673 673
4. Conclusions [4] Chan SYN, Feng NQ, Tsang MKC. Durability of high-strength
concrete incorporating carrier fluidifying agent. Mag Concr Res
2000;52(4):235–42.
1. The compressive strength of HSC improved with ad- [5] Tasdemir C, Tasdemir MA, Lydon FD, Barr BIG. Effects of silica
ditions of steel fibers at various volume fractions. The fume and aggregate size of the brittleness of concrete. Cem Concr
strength showed a maximum at 1.5% fraction but a Res 1996;26(1):63–8.
slight decrease at 2% fraction compared to 1.5%, [6] Palmquist SM, Jansen DC. Postpeak strain–stress relationship for
still remaining 12.9% higher than before the fiber concrete in compression. ACI Mater J 2001;98(3):213–9.
[7] Hsu LS, Hsu T. Stress strain behavior of steel-fiber high-strength
addition. concrete under compression. ACI Struct J 1994;91(4):448–57.
2. The splitting tensile strength and modulus of rupture [8] Chunxiang Q, Patnaikuni I. Properties of high-strength steel fiber-
of HSFRC both improved with increasing fiber vol- reinforced concrete beams in bending. Cem Concr Com
ume fraction. The splitting tensile strength ranged 1999;21(1):73–81.
from 19.0% to 98.3% higher for the fractions from [9] Khaloo AR, Kim N. Mechanical properties of normal to high-
strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Cem Concr Aggr
0.5% to 2.0%. And the modulus of rupture ranged 1996;18(2):92–7.
from 28.1% to 126.6% higher for the fraction from [10] Eren O,€ Cß elik T. Effect of silica fume and steel fibers on some
0.5% to 2.0%. properties of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater
3. The strength-effectiveness showed at each volume 1997;11(7–8):373–82.
[11] Marar K, Eren O, € Cß elik T. Relationship between impact energy
fraction a maximum for modulus of rupture, fol-
and compression toughness energy of high-strength fiber-rein-
lowed by splitting tensile strength, and compressive forced concrete. Mater Lett 2001;47:297–304.
strength. [12] Daniel L, Loukili A. Behavior of high-strength fiber-reinforced
4. The strength models developed for HSFRC predicts concrete beams under cyclic loading. ACI Struct J 2002;99(3):248–
the compressive and splitting tensile strengths and 56.
modulus of rupture accurately. [13] Chenkui H, Guofan Z. Properties of steel fibre reinforced concrete
containing larger coarse aggregate. Cem Concr Comp
1995;17:199–206.
[14] Williamson, GR. The effect of steel fibers on the compressive
References strength of concrete. ACI SP-44, 1974;195–207.
[15] ACI Committee 363, State of the art report on high strength
[1] Swamy RN. High-strength concrete-material properties and concrete, (ACI 363R-84), Detroit: American Concrete Institute;
structural behaviors. ACI SP-87, Detroit: American Concrete 1984. p. 48.
Institute; 1987. p. 110–146. [16] Wafa FF, Ashour SA. Mechanical properties of high-strength
[2] Rabbat BG, Russell HG. Optimized sections for precast, pre- fiber reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J 1992;89(5):449–55.
stressed bridge girders. Research and Development Bulletin No. [17] Nilson AH. Design implications of current research on high-
RD080.01E, Portland Cement Association, Skokie 1982. p. 10. strength concrete. ACI SP-87, Detroit: American Concrete Insti-
[3] Mbessa M, Pera J. Durability of high-strength concrete in tute; 1987. p. 85–109.
ammonium sulfate solution. Cem Concr Res 2001;31(8):1227– [18] ACI Committee 544, State of the art report of fiber reinforced
31. concrete. Concr. Int.: Des. Construct. 1982;4(5):9–30.