You are on page 1of 5

Construction

and Building

Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673


MATERIALS
www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmat

Mechanical properties of high-strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete


a,* b
P.S. Song , S. Hwang
a
Department of Civil Engineering, Dahan Institute of Technology, Sincheng, Hualien 971, Taiwan, ROC
b
Department of System Engineering, Chung Cheng Institute of Technology, National Defense University, Dashi, Taoyuan 335, Taiwan, ROC
Received 7 August 2002; received in revised form 13 April 2004; accepted 14 April 2004
Available online 17 June 2004

Abstract

The marked brittleness with low tensile strength and strain capacities of high-strength concrete (HSC) can be overcome by the
addition of steel fibers. This paper investigated the mechanical properties of high-strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete. The
properties included compressive and splitting tensile strengths, modulus of rupture, and toughness index. The steel fibers were added
at the volume fractions of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%. The compressive strength of the fiber-reinforced concrete reached a max-
imum at 1.5% volume fraction, being a 15.3% improvement over the HSC. The splitting tensile strength and modulus of rupture of
the fiber-reinforced concrete improved with increasing the volume fraction, achieving 98.3% and 126.6% improvements, respectively,
at 2.0% volume fraction. The toughness index of the fiber-reinforced concrete improved with increasing the fraction. The indexes I5 ,
I10 , and I30 registered values of 6.5, 11.8, and 20.6, respectively, at 2.0% fraction. Strength models were established to predict the
compressive and splitting tensile strengths and modulus of rupture of the fiber-reinforced concrete. The models give predictions
matching the measurements.
Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Steel fibers; High-strength concrete; High-strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete

1. Introduction excellent resistance to aggressive environments and dis-


integrating agencies, and benefiting the durability of
The engineering characteristics and economic ad- concrete buildings and structures [3,4].
vantages of high-strength concrete (HSC) are distinct The comparatively higher compressive strength of
from conventional concrete, thereby popularizing the HSC is an attractive profit; whereas, the strength be-
HSC concrete in a large variety of applications in the haves against the ductility of the concrete by welcoming
construction industry. Used for high-rise buildings, brittleness pronouncedly [5]. The HSC always possesses
HSC avoids the unacceptable oversized columns on the a steeper descending stress–strain curve in compression
lower floors, allowing large column spacing and usable than does the normal strength concrete. The rapid de-
floor space, or increasing the number of possible stories crease in compressive strength in the post-peak load
without detracting from lower floors [1]. Used for long- region brings about a pronouncedly brittle mode of
span bridges, HSC reduces the dead load of bridge failure [6]. To foster the compressive strength without
girders for fewer and lighter bridge piers and thus en- sacrificing the ductility, a strategy is to add discrete steel
ables greater underpass clearance widths. HSC inspires fibers as reinforcement in HSC [7]. As the high-strength
substantial savings in expenditure on bridge mainte- steel fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFRC) hardens,
nance, while prolonging the serviceable life of the shrinks, or bears service loads to develop cracks and to
bridges [2]. Further, HSC possesses uniform high den- propagate them, the fibers evenly distributed throughout
sity and very low impermeability, endowing itself with the composite intersect, block, and even arrest the
propagating cracks. This way, the addition of fibers
*
Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +886-3-8263936. contributes strength to the concrete [8]. First, Khaloo
E-mail address: pssong@ms01.dahan.edu.tw (P.S. Song). and Kim [9] investigated the strength improvement to

0950-0618/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.027
670 P.S. Song, S. Hwang / Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673

HSC containing 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% volume fractions then added in small amounts to avoid fiber balling and
of steel fibers, declaring that compressive and splitting to produce the concrete with uniform material consis-
tensile strengths improved to 1.0% fraction, whereas the tency and good workability. For concrete mixes with a
modulus of rupture did up to 1.5%. Eren and C ß elik [10] 2.0% volume of fibers, extra time was required for
studied the strength-producing effect of steel fibers and mixing. The freshly mix steel fiber-reinforced concrete
silica fume in HSC, indicating that the fiber volume and was placed in two equal layers into a cylinder mold to
fiber aspect ratio governed the compressive strength of cast a standard 150  300 mm cylindrical concrete
the concrete. Chunxiang and Patnaikuni [8] indicated specimen for a compressive strength test and a splitting
that the compressive strength of HSFRC increased with tensile test, and into a 150  150  530 mm beam mold
maturity, which increased 24% in the aged 76 day for a flexure strength test. Each layer was consolidated
HSFRC. According to Marar et al. [11], at each fiber using a vibrating table. At the end of 24 h after con-
aspect ratio, the compressive strength of HSFRC im- solidating, the specimen was removed from the mold
proved with the increase in fiber volume. And as far as and cured in water at 73  3 °F for 28 days. And then a
Daniel and Loukili [12] declared, the compressive strength test was performed.
strength of HSFRC held 15% advantage over its HSC
partner. The foregoing discussions indicate the steel fi- 2.3. Test methods
ber additions primarily exerting the pick-up effect on the
compressive strength. However, the additions play also The compressive strength test, performed on 15 of
devotedly in developing splitting tensile and flexural the standard test cylinders, followed ASTM C39 test
strengths. for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete speci-
This paper further investigated the strength im- mens. The cylinders were loaded, in a testing machine
proving potentials of HSFRC containing 0.5%, 1.0%, under load control, at the rate of 0.3 MPa/s until
1.5%, and 2.0% volume of hooked-end steel fibers in failure.
comparison with the plain high-strength counterpart, The splitting tensile test, run on 15 of the test cyl-
and established models predicting the behavior of inders, was in accordance with the ASTM C496 test for
HSFRC under compression, splitting tension, and splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete speci-
flexure. mens, although ACI committee 544.2R hardly recom-
mends the use of the test on fiber-reinforced concrete.
The running arose because the ratio of fiber length to
2. Experimental program cylinder diameter took a low value of 0.23 in the work
and because some investigators have shown that the
2.1. Materials ASTM C496 test is applicable to fiber-reinforced con-
crete specimen [9,13]. In the test, load applications
Type I cement, river sand with a fineness modulus of were continuous and shockless, at a constant rate
3.1, and crushed basalt of 19 mm maximum size were of 900 kPa/min splitting tensile stress until specimen
used. Silica fume used was a commercially available failure.
byproduct of the production of silicon metal and fer- The flexural strength (modulus of rupture, MOR)
rosilicon alloys, which improved concrete properties in test, conducted using 15 test beams under third-point
fresh and hardened states. To improve the workability loading, followed the ASTM C1018 test for flexural
of concrete, a high-range water-reducing admixture toughness and first-crack strength of fiber-reinforced
(superplasticizer) was employed during mixing opera- concrete. The mid-span deflection was the average of the
tions. The cement, silica fume, water, superplasticizer, ones detected by the transducers through contact with
river sand and crushed basalt of 430, 43, 133, 9, 739 and brackets attached to the beam specimen. The testing
1052 kg/m3 were used to make the HSC. The slump of machine ran to increase the deflection at a constant rate;
the concrete was 60 mm. The hooked-end steel fibers the load–deflection relation recorded using an X –Y
were made of mild carbon steel. The fibers have an av- plotter.
erage length of 35 mm, nominal diameter of 0.55 mm,
and the aspect ratio of 64. These fibers are available in
bundles of about 30 fibers, which were fibrillated with 3. Results and discussion
water-soluble glue to ensure immediate dispersion in
concrete during mixing. Table 1 presents the strength test results on HSFRC
and HSC. Each strength test result was the average for
2.2. Preparation of samples 15 test specimens. The compressive strength, splitting
tensile strength, and modulus of rupture of HSFRC
In the production of concrete, the constituent mate- improved to different extents in response to the fiber
rials were initially mixed without fibers. The fibers were volume fractions.
P.S. Song, S. Hwang / Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673 671

Table 1
Strength test results and strength-effectiveness on HSFRC and HSC
Fiber volume Compressive strength Splitting tensile strength Modulus of rupture
fraction (%)
Measured Strength- Measured Strength- Measured Strength-
(MPa) effectivenessa (%) (MPa) effectivenessa (%) (MPa) effectivenessa (%)
0 85 – 5.8 – 6.4 –
0.5 91 7.1 6.9 19.0 8.2 28.1
1.0 95 11.8 8.7 50.0 10.1 57.8
1.5 98 15.3 10.8 86.2 12.3 92.2
2.0 96 12.9 11.5 98.3 14.5 126.6
a
Strength-effectiveness ¼ HSFRC strengthHSC strength
HSC strength  100%.

3.1. Compressive strength pressive strength improvement of HSFRC ranged from


7.1% to 15.3% at the volume fractions of 0.5% to 2.0%,
The compressive strength development of HSFRC comparable to the improvements of 4.3–10.4% for nor-
versus HSC appears Fig. 1, declaring that the com- mal-strength concrete at the same fractions [14].
pressive strength fc0 of HSC was 85 MPa and of HSFRC Following from the compressive strength test results,
provided an improvement at each volume fraction. The the compressive strength fcf0 of HSFRC was predicted
improvement, as the strength-effectiveness in Table 1, using the compressive strength fc0 of HSC and the fiber
was 7.1% at 0.5% fraction, 11.8% at 1.0% fraction, volume fraction Vf , and was expressed as
15.3% at 1.5% fraction, and reduced to 12.9% at 2.0%
fcf0 ðMPaÞ ¼ fc0 þ AVf þ BVf2 : ð1Þ
fraction, being a reduction small compared to the
maximum improvement at 1.5% fraction. The com- Substituting fc0 ¼ 85 MPa in Eq. (1) and applying the
regression analysis gave
fcf0 ðMPaÞ ¼ 85 þ 15:12Vf  4:71Vf2 : ð2Þ
100
The compressive strength predictions using Eq. (2)
agreed favorably with the test results, as in Table 2. The
Compressive strength (MPa)

95 prediction errors run below 1.02%.

90
3.2. Splitting tensile strength

The development of splitting tensile strength of


85 HSFRC at various volume fractions is shown in Fig. 2;
compared to HSC, the strength of HSFRC improved
80 with increasing the volume fraction. From the strength-
Measurements
effectiveness in Table 1, the improvement started from
Predictions f'cf = 85 + 15.12Vf - 4.71Vf2
19% at 0.5% fraction and expanded to 98.3% at 2.0%
75
fraction.
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
The splitting tensile strength ftf of HSFRC
pffiffiffiffi was pre-
Fiber volume fraction Vf (%)
dicted by using the compressive strength fc0 of HSC
Fig. 1. Effect of fiber volume on compressive strength. and the volume fraction Vf , and was given as follows:

Table 2
Comparison of predicted and measured values for compressive and splitting tensile strengths and modulus of rupture
Fiber volume Compressive strength Splitting tensile strength Modulus of rupture
fraction (%)
Predicted Measured Prediction Predicted Measured Prediction Predicted Measured Prediction
(MPa) (MPa) errora (%) (MPa) (MPa) Error (%) (MPa) (MPa) error (%)
0 85 85 0 5.8 5.8 0 6.4 6.4 0
0.5 91 91 0 7.3 6.9 5.80 8.2 8.2 0
1.0 95 95 0 8.8 8.7 1.15 10.2 10.1 0.99
1.5 97 98 )1.02 10.3 10.8 )4.63 12.3 12.3 0
2.0 96 96 0 11.7 11.5 1.74 14.5 14.5 0
a
Prediction error ¼ predictedmeasured
valuemeasured
value
value
 100%.
672 P.S. Song, S. Hwang / Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673

12 Table 1 indicates that the MOR values were higher by


28.1%, 57.8%, 92.2%, and 126.6% at the fractions of
Splitting tensile strength (MPa)

11 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%, respectively, compared to


the HSC.
10
The MOR value frfpofffiffiffiffi HSFRC was related to the
9 compressive strength fc0 of HSC and the volume
fraction Vf and was given as
8 pffiffiffiffi
frf ðMPaÞ ¼ A fc0 þ BVf þ CVf2 : ð5Þ
7
Again, substituting fc0 ¼ 85 MPa in Eq. (5) and applying
Measurements
6 the regression analysis gave
Predictions ftf = 5.8 + 3.01Vf - 0.02Vf 2
5 frf ðMPaÞ ¼ 6:4 þ 3:43Vf þ 0:32Vf2 : ð6Þ
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Fiber volume fraction Vf (%) To the HSC, p Eq.
ffiffiffiffi (6) givepan
ffiffiffiffiffi MOR value of 6.4 MPa
equal to 0:69 fc0 ¼ ð0:69 85Þ. p The
ffiffiffiffi coefficient of 0.69
Fig. 2. Effect of fiber volume on splitting tensile strength. lies slightly above that of 0:63 fc0 obtained by ACI pffiffiffiffi
318 for p normal
ffiffiffiffi and HSCs and below those of 0:9 fc0
pffiffiffiffi and 1:0 fc0 obtained by Nilson [17] and Wafa and
ftf ðMPaÞ ¼ A fc0 þ BVf þ CVf2 : ð3Þ Ashour [16], respectively, and come close to 0.68 by
Khaloo and Kim [9] for HSC. The MOR values of
Substituting fc0 ¼ 85 MPa in Eq. (3) and applying the
HSFRC, predicted using Eq. (6), are presented in Table
regression analysis gave
2. These MOR values predicted approach the measured
ftf ðMPaÞ ¼ 5:8 þ 3:01Vf  0:02Vf2 : ð4Þ ones.
At Vf ¼ 0%, Eq. (4) gives the HSC a value of
pffiffiffiffi ftf ¼ 5:8
pffiffiffiffiffi 3.4. Flexural toughness
MPa, equal to that given by 0:63 fc0 ð¼ 0:63 85Þ. The
coefficient of 0.63 runs near 0.54 derived by ACI 363
Flexural toughness is the energy absorbed in de-
[15], 0.58 by Wafa and Ashour [16], 0.67 by Khaloo and
flecting a beam a specified amount, being the area under
Kim [9], and 0.68 by Nilson [17]. Eq. (4) shows a satis-
a load–deflection (P –d) curve for the 150  150  530
factory fit to the splitting tensile test results at various
mm steel fibrous beam tested in third-point bending.
fiber fractions, as Table 2 shows.
Index toughness I for steel fiber-reinforced concrete
reflects the improvement in flexural toughness over the
3.3. Modulus of rupture
nonfiber-reinforced concrete, being the flexural tough-
ness at a specified deflection divided by that at the first-
The MOR for HSFRC at various volume fractions
crack deflection d of nonfiber-reinforced concrete. The
appears in Fig. 3. And the strength-effectiveness in
widely estimated indexes are I5 at 3d, I10 at 5:5d, and, I30
at 15:5d [18]. All the three indexes reached unity,
assuming that the nonfiber-reinforced matrix is elastic-
16
brittle. These indexes increased their values with in-
creasing volume fraction. The I5 , I10 and I30 values were
6.5, 11.8, and 20.6, respectively, at the fraction of 2.0%
14
Modulus of rupture (MPa)

(see Table 3).

12

10
Table 3
Toughness index at various fiber volume fractions
8 Fiber volume fraction (%) Toughness index
Measurements
I5 I10 I30
Predictions frf = 6.4 + 3.43Vf + 0.32Vf2
6 0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.5 3.0 4.8 8.2
1.0 3.3 6.2 12.4
Fiber volume fraction Vf (%) 1.5 4.2 8.3 17.8
2.0 6.5 11.8 20.6
Fig. 3. Effect of fiber volume on modulus of rupture.
P.S. Song, S. Hwang / Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 669–673 673

4. Conclusions [4] Chan SYN, Feng NQ, Tsang MKC. Durability of high-strength
concrete incorporating carrier fluidifying agent. Mag Concr Res
2000;52(4):235–42.
1. The compressive strength of HSC improved with ad- [5] Tasdemir C, Tasdemir MA, Lydon FD, Barr BIG. Effects of silica
ditions of steel fibers at various volume fractions. The fume and aggregate size of the brittleness of concrete. Cem Concr
strength showed a maximum at 1.5% fraction but a Res 1996;26(1):63–8.
slight decrease at 2% fraction compared to 1.5%, [6] Palmquist SM, Jansen DC. Postpeak strain–stress relationship for
still remaining 12.9% higher than before the fiber concrete in compression. ACI Mater J 2001;98(3):213–9.
[7] Hsu LS, Hsu T. Stress strain behavior of steel-fiber high-strength
addition. concrete under compression. ACI Struct J 1994;91(4):448–57.
2. The splitting tensile strength and modulus of rupture [8] Chunxiang Q, Patnaikuni I. Properties of high-strength steel fiber-
of HSFRC both improved with increasing fiber vol- reinforced concrete beams in bending. Cem Concr Com
ume fraction. The splitting tensile strength ranged 1999;21(1):73–81.
from 19.0% to 98.3% higher for the fractions from [9] Khaloo AR, Kim N. Mechanical properties of normal to high-
strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Cem Concr Aggr
0.5% to 2.0%. And the modulus of rupture ranged 1996;18(2):92–7.
from 28.1% to 126.6% higher for the fraction from [10] Eren O,€ Cß elik T. Effect of silica fume and steel fibers on some
0.5% to 2.0%. properties of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater
3. The strength-effectiveness showed at each volume 1997;11(7–8):373–82.
[11] Marar K, Eren O, € Cß elik T. Relationship between impact energy
fraction a maximum for modulus of rupture, fol-
and compression toughness energy of high-strength fiber-rein-
lowed by splitting tensile strength, and compressive forced concrete. Mater Lett 2001;47:297–304.
strength. [12] Daniel L, Loukili A. Behavior of high-strength fiber-reinforced
4. The strength models developed for HSFRC predicts concrete beams under cyclic loading. ACI Struct J 2002;99(3):248–
the compressive and splitting tensile strengths and 56.
modulus of rupture accurately. [13] Chenkui H, Guofan Z. Properties of steel fibre reinforced concrete
containing larger coarse aggregate. Cem Concr Comp
1995;17:199–206.
[14] Williamson, GR. The effect of steel fibers on the compressive
References strength of concrete. ACI SP-44, 1974;195–207.
[15] ACI Committee 363, State of the art report on high strength
[1] Swamy RN. High-strength concrete-material properties and concrete, (ACI 363R-84), Detroit: American Concrete Institute;
structural behaviors. ACI SP-87, Detroit: American Concrete 1984. p. 48.
Institute; 1987. p. 110–146. [16] Wafa FF, Ashour SA. Mechanical properties of high-strength
[2] Rabbat BG, Russell HG. Optimized sections for precast, pre- fiber reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J 1992;89(5):449–55.
stressed bridge girders. Research and Development Bulletin No. [17] Nilson AH. Design implications of current research on high-
RD080.01E, Portland Cement Association, Skokie 1982. p. 10. strength concrete. ACI SP-87, Detroit: American Concrete Insti-
[3] Mbessa M, Pera J. Durability of high-strength concrete in tute; 1987. p. 85–109.
ammonium sulfate solution. Cem Concr Res 2001;31(8):1227– [18] ACI Committee 544, State of the art report of fiber reinforced
31. concrete. Concr. Int.: Des. Construct. 1982;4(5):9–30.

You might also like