Giant Motor Company I
T sue is planning the company’s production
capacity for the coming year. /Ai issue is the overall
evel of capacity and the type of capacity—for ex-
ample, the degree of flexibilin in the manufacturing
system. The main tool used to aid the company’s
planning process in GMC T is 2 mixed integer pro-
amming (MIP) mode!. 4. mixed integer program
both integer and cyalunuous variables. Ac
unuauion of this probie-n, GMC I (at the end of
Chapter 10), deals with capacity planning in amul-
tiperiod, multiscensrio framework. In GMC the
MIP model is extend-d 20 handle the multiperiog
stochastic nature of the problem.
bis problem deals with strategic planning
issues for @ large company. The main is-
Probiem Statement
The Giant Motor Company (GMC) produces three
ines.of carsgor ihe domestic (U.S.) matket: Lyras.
‘Librais,andHip¢ ras. The Lyra is a relatively inexper-
sive-subcompect car that appeals mainly to first-time
car owners aad to households using it as a second
car for comanuting. The Libra is a sporty compact
car that is sleeker, faster, and roomier than the Lyra.
Without «wy options, the Libis costs slightly "arbre,
‘han the Lyte; additiond qpfigns increase the price
‘furthe: ‘The Hydra is the laxury car of the GAIC
Hine it isssignificantly more expensive than the Lyra
‘an¢..Libra, and it has the highest profit margin of the
chee cars,
Expaaision
GMIC has three manufacturing plants in
‘States. Each plant is dedicated to pro-
gle line of .cars. In its planning for
gFea. GMC is considering the zeto0l-
plants would have significatily
foreared fion capacities. Although having
greater fixed ‘SUMS, the Tetooled plants would be
more efficient afid have lower marginal production
334
‘they would have the capabi
‘than one line of cars,
The characteristics of the current plants and the
retooled plants are given in Table 6.81. The retooled
Lyra and Libre plants are prefaced by the word nev.
‘The fixed costs and capacitiesin Table 6 81 are given
11 an annual basis, A dash in the profit margin sec
tion indicates that the plant cannot manufacture that
Jine of car. Forexample, the new Lyra plant would be
capable of producing both Lyras and Litras but not
Hydras. The new Libra plant would be capable of
producifig sity of the three Zines of cars. Note, how-
ever, that the new Libra plant has
(profit margin for producing Hydras than the Hydra
plant. The Bexible new Libra plantis capable of
Gucing the Jumury Hydre model but is not quite as
efficient as the current Hydra plant that is-dedi
to Hyatra production,
‘The fixed posts are annual costs thet-arencurres
by GMC independent of the number of cars that are
produce by the plant. Forthe current plant con-
Eoin iieieed ose include
i van the, loan that
wi E gad s0°6n. Ht e.plant
‘buat
ir faced with inoufficiet capacity. Partially oe
ting the lak of capavity is the phenomenon of de-
mani diversion. if a potential car buyer walks into
Chapte: 6 Linear Optimization Models with Ineger Variablesanting to buy «
‘k, frequently the salesper:
jomer to purchase. the-berter Li
stock. Unsatisfied demand for
2 be diverted to-the Libre. Ont
farely in this simation can the
the customer to switch to the
of unsatisfied demabd-for Lyras'
mand fer Lintas and: '5% 10
10% “oF unsatisfied
is diverted to demand for Hydras. For
the demané for Lyras is 1,400,000: cats, then the
unsatisfied demand will be 400,000°if no capacity
added. Out of this unsatisfied demand,’ 120,000
400,000 x 0.3) will materialize as demand for”
Libras, and 20,000 (= 400,000 x 0.05) will ma-
terialize as. demand for Hydras. Similarly, if the
demane for Libras is 1,220,000 cars (1,100,000 orig-
inal demand plus 120,000 demand diverted from.
=
20,000 no capacity is. f this unsat
ished demand, 42,000 (= 421 000 x 0.1} will
terialize as.demand for Hydras. All-other unsatisfied
demand is los io competitors. The partes of de-
mand diversion is summarized in Table 6.83,
Price 003 Demand Dives
GliC wantstodecide whether to retoo! the Lyza ani
‘Libca:plaaii Jateddition, GMC wants to deterine
Hoi plas’ at each plant in the coming year.
Based om the previous data, formulate « mixed in-
teger programming model for solving GMC's ‘pro-
duction planning-capacity expansion problem for
the coming year:
“Acknowledgment: The ides for GMC I and I catae from
Eppen et al. (1988),
Case 61 Gian Moor Company? 335