Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prospects
R. Prummer
vcrdichlclcs Material
40i
expand. Schwaden
Behiiller mrndung / Vcrdichtungswelle l ' ' ' ' i ' ' ' ' l ' ' ' ' l ' ' ' ' l ' ' " l ' " ' l ' ~ ' ' l ' ' ~ ~
Yo1 Delomllon\ -80 -40 40 80
Dirtanca from axis at symmetry (mml
Detonalionsfronl
T VD
Explosivsloff
Behallnis fur
Explosivsloff
Fig. 3. Shock front in explosive compaction of tungsten powder
[lo], simulated [12] by the HEMP-code [Ill.
//
/
'
/
0 / is required to densify a metal powder, where HV is the
2
UI
8-
P direct expl. cornp (Prumrner) hardness of its particles and @E is the density of the
M gas gun (Morris) explosive.
H gas gun (Herrrnann) For ceramic powders, however, difficulties arise due to
B gas gun (Butcher)
M L gas gun (Linde) the effect of adiabatic shearing. During compaction, as the
G gas gun (Gourdin) shock wave proceeds toward the center of the cylindrical
S gas gun (Akashi. Sawaocka) sample, an already consolidated outer shell has to be
crushed in order to allow the center part of the sample to be
compacted. Adiabatic shearing is the mechanism for this
I ) purpose. Figure5 shows the cross section of an alumina
4dO 5;)O 8dO 960 I:' 10000 rod, made by explosive compaction of AlzO3-powder of
Vickers hardness in kN/rnrn2 5 pm particle size [15]. Thin metal foils (100 pm thick) were
Fig. 4. Pressure required for densification of powders as a function
used to make the shearing visible. When the density of the
of hardness of powder particles [lo]. consolidated rod is limited to 95% of the theoretical
density, adiabatic shearing can be avoided.
Energy Consideration
Fig. 5. Cross Section of a rod of 18 mm diameter made by Most of the internal energy E in the explosive compac-
explosive compaction of A1203 powder (grain size = 5 p n ) with a tion of porous materials arises as heat at the powder-
spirally shaped metal foil (niobium) to demonstrate the occurence particle's surface. If this heat is supplied rapidly and if its
of adiabatic shearing when compaction pressure is too high [15]. dissipation occurs comparably slowly, surface melting of
Po
Vl “0
- v; Fig. 6. Hugoniot-curves for solid and porous maten-
spezifisrhes Volumen spezifisches Volurnen als - schematic.
the particles can take place [16-191. After cooling a It is self-evident that the explosive liquid phase sintering
structure of the consolidated materials is obtained consist- (ELPS) process allows sintering of amorphous materials.
ing of a shock-wave-hardened interior of the individual During compaction of amorphous powders heating occurs
particles welded to neighbour powder particles by a rapidly and leads to a melting of the surface of the particles and
solidified “interphase”. Therefore this process is called rapid cooling does not allow recrystallization to set in [10,
“Explosive Liquid Phase Sintering”. Figure 7 shows the 15,20,21] provided that the compaction pressure is not too
metallurgical micrograph [101 of an explosively compacted high.
superalloy IN 100. It can be seen that the dentritic structure In more recent investigations it has been shown that bulk
in the welded interphase is much finer than in the original samples made of superalloy powders by explosive compac-
powder particles. It can be estimated from the distance of tion can have superior strength compared to conventionally
the dentritic structure [17] that the cooling rate in the (hot isostatically pressed) samples. Figure 8 shows the yield
welded interphase is very high (in the order of 1014sec-l). A strength (Fig. 8a) and ultimate tensile strength (Fig. 8b)
compacted sample made by “Explosive Liquid Phase versus the annealing temperature. Annealing was applied
Sintering” therefore consists of work hardened interiors of after dynamic compaction with a gun. The compacted
the powder particle surrounded by a network of extremely sample has a yield strength of 1 GPa, which is about 10%
rapidly quenched material. higher than that of the hot isostatically pressed sample.
After heat treatment at 620 “Cthe shock-compacted sample
has a 20% higher yield strength and a 40% higher UTS than
the hot isostaticalIy pressed sample. The increase in
strength is attributed to interparticle melting (ELPS, as
described above). In addition a high density of fine and
uniformly dispersed y”-precipitates is observed. In compar-
ison to hot isostatically pressed material the shocked
material is activated, resulting in faster nucleation kinetics
and therefore in finer (about half size) and in a larger
number of yrrprecipitates in the shock compacted mate-
rial.
- 1.6-
D.
9
a - 1.8.
2
b
U 0
- 1.4- A A A