DIRECTORATE GENERAL BORDER ROADS TECHNICAL INSTRUCTION NO. 3 (Revision-1993) GENERAL INVESTIGATION AND SURVEY OF PERMANENT BRIDGE PROJECT2.2.3 GENERAL INVESTIGATION AND SURVEY OF PERMANENT BRIDGE PROJECT INTRODUCTION Permanent bridges of spans more than 30 m fall under the category of Major Bridges. The efficacy of these bridges is vital to the maintenance of the line of communication and uninterrupted movement of traffic. To en- sure the trouble free Rerformance of these bridges, detailed investigation, survey, data collection and data computation will be required for proper siting, designing and planning of the bridge scheme. DGBR Technical Instruction No. 3. ‘Bridge Survey and Project Report’’ was issued on this subject and the same was subsequently revised in 1967 vide HQ DGBR letter No, 68004/ DGBR/E-2(Pig-l) dated 10 Apr 67. Since then BRO has gained much experience in this field of activity. New publications of IRC and MOST have been issued on various aspects covering or relating to the investigation and survey of bridge projects. in view of this DGBR TI. No. 3 (Revision-1993) is prepared for application in BRO. It supersedes the earlier DGBR T.. No. 3 and DGBR Tl. No. 3 (Revision-1967). DGBR TI. No. 3 (Revision-1993) will be read in conjunction with other revised and new Ts for supplementary references and elaboration. PLANNING OF OPERATIONS Aim: The aim is to decide the final location of the bridge and to collect data for that location for the preparation of the bridge scheme and sub- sequent detailed design. General Considerations in Bridge Siting In general, the merits of the site will decide the location of the bridge. Hill roads are constructed much ahead of the construction of the per- manent bridges, Though the alignment of the road broadly takes into ac- count the suitability of the location of river crossings but each situation will be subject to rigorous technical survey, investigation, examination and treatment for safe, suitable and economical bridge siting and subsequent designing. The safety, suitability and cost of the alignment of approaches will alsobe considered in the final location of the bridge. 2.2.4 The total cost of the bridge and the approaches will be considered. 2.2.5 The consideration of the approaches to alignment and the bridge siting will be guided on the following general principles: (a) (b) (e) The location of the bridge upto a total length of 60 metres shall be governed by the alignment of the approaches unless there are some special problems in bridge design. In case of bridges on hill roads, both approaches and good site will have equal consideration. For major bridges of total length between 60 to 300 metres, both Proper alignment of approaches and requirements of good bridge site should be considered together in ascertaining the most suitable site. For major bridges with total lengths above 300 metres, the require- ment of good site should be of paramount importance and therefore it will govern the approach road design. 2.3. Sequence of Operations 2.3.1 The survey and investigation of bridge project will be conducted in a planned manner in the following sequence of operations:- (a) (b) (c) (d) Map study for Tentative Feasible Sites. Preliminary Survey & Investigation for Site Selection. Decision on Final Bridge Site. Detailed Engineering of Site Selected. 2.3.2 The sequence of operations may be suitably rehashed for different categories mentioned in Para 2.2.5 above. 2.4 Board of Officers for Site Selection A team comprising of three officers with SE(C)/ Lt. Col, EE(C)/Maj. and AEE(C)/AE(C) level will be detailed by HQ (P) for selection of site. In case of bridges of longer span and or problematic cases, HQ DGBR/Br.Dte may consider to associate its representative with the Board. MAP STUDY 3.1 Toposheets Toposheets in the following scales will be used:-4.2.) (a) 1: 2,50,000 (6) 1 : 50,000 Methodology (a) Consider the topography of the reach u/s and d/s. (6) Mark problem areas. (c) Reject stretches where possibility of finding suitable site is neglegible. (a) Area after rejection is delineated for ground survey. (e) Mark 2-3 tentative sites in the delineated areas. PRELIMINARY SURVEY & INVESTIGATION FOR SITE SELECTION Reconnaissance and Data Collection Preliminary survey and investigation of the site identified in the map study will be carried out to help the process of selection of site. The list of site data is given in Appendix |-Data of Alternate Bridge Site. Consideration in Site Selection Some points for consideration in the analysis of the alternative sites are given hereunder:- (a) As far as possible, the bridge be sited where the width of stream is minimum, (b) Stream to have stable and well-defined banks. (c) As far as possible, reach upstream and down stream of the site be straight. (d) Bridge be at right angles to the direction of flow. (@) Approaches be straight. (f) The site be located away from the confluence region of large tributaries specifically in its upstream. (g) The sites be at a minimum clear distance of 300 metres from any existing railway bridge on the same river. (h) The site to avoid costly approaches. G) ‘It be free from outflanking attack of the river fo avoid costly protec- tive river training works. (k)_ It is to avoid excessive under-water construction. () It be not located near the land-slide or unstable zone and/or avalanche prone area. (m) The comparative economics of using the existing temporary bridge as a diversion and constructing permanent. bridge at a new site vis- a-vis constructing the permanent bridge at the existing bridge siteand constructing a diversion to regulate the traffic during construc- tion be studied. 4.3 Rough Cost Assessment The rough cost estimate of bridge, approach and protective works for the alternative sites will be prepared based on per metre price or on earlier estimate of similar work in that region. 4,4 Comparative Study of Alternative Sites It inéludes the merits/demerits and the cost of alternative sites. It will in- clude the bridge, approach and protective works for each site. 4.5 Preparation of Report on Site Selection 61 Report On Site Selection will be prepared by the Task Force and will con- tain the followings:- Part | : Statement of case. : Recommendation of TF Commander. Part Il: Appendices: — Data For Alternative Bridge Sites (Para 4.1). — Rough Cost Assessment of Alternative Sites (Para 4.3). — Comparative Study of Alternative Sites (Para 4.4). — Abstract of Field book. Part ll: Sketches & Plans: — Toposheet marked with Alternative Sites. — Sketch map of each site. — Sketch plan showing rough alignment of the approaches. DECISION ON FINAL BRIDGE SITE The Report On Site Selection will be considered by the Chief Engineer of the Project who will give his approval after inspection of site. Report On Site Selection and the approval of Chief Engineer will be con- sidered by the HQ DGBR (Br. Dte) and acceptance will be conveyed to the H@ (P) after their satisfaction of the observations, if any, and/or in- spection of site, DETAILED ENGINEERING OF SITE SELECTED Detailed survey and investigation will be undertaken in respect of the siteselected for collection of general or topographic, climatic and hydraulic data. The normal methods of survey and investigation will be applied with modifications required, if any. Some elements are covered in Appendix-| but will be again checked and confirmed before incorporating the same in the data sheet against the particular selected site. The details of the data for the proposed bridge will be compiled as per Appendix-ll, For convenience of the functional staff, this Appendix will be termed as Ap- pendix-ll: Hydraulic Data For selected Bridge Site. It will be authenti- cated/signed by the Comar Task Force after due scrutiny and verification. Supplementary information will be furnished and incorporated on the basis of the study of existing geological information, previous site reports, geological maps, air photographs, etc. and surface geological examina- tion. For large and important structures, the information may be supple- mented by geophysical methods. The above information (Paras 6.1 and 6.2) will be examined and scrutinised by HQ CE (P) and accepted by Chief Engineer (P) for accuracy and adequacy, and submitted to HQ DGBR (Br. Dte). HQ DGBR (Br. Dte) will conduct their scrutiny of the data and interact with H@ (P), if required, to confirm the accuracy and adequacy of the same. HQ DGBR (Br. Dte) may consider the requirement of following aspects:- Geophysical Investigation such as:- i) Electrical Resistivity: The electrical resistivity method is based on the measurement and recording of changes in the mean resistivity or ap- parent specific resistance of various soils, The resistivity is defined as the resistance between opposite faces of a Unit Cube (Cm cube) of the soil. Each soil has its own resistivity depending upon water con- tent, compaction and composition. Thus it is possible to know the na- ture and thickness of different strata of soils based on electrical resistivity values, ii) Seismic Refraction Test: In this method shock waves are created into soil at ground level or a certain depth below it by exploding small charges in the soil or by striking a plate on the soil with hammer. The radiation shock waves are picked by the vibration detector where time of travel is recorded. The different velocity of waves indicate the different layers of the soil strata and its density. In a denser layer the waves travel much faster. This method is used for differentiating the various soil strata based on the velocity values..6.4.2 6.6 6.7 6.8 Hydraulic model studies are carried out for determination of river be- haviour with particular reference to:- i) Changing of river course fi) Angle of bridge axis ili) Adequacy and water way iv) Maximum depth of scour at critical locations ¥) Requirement of protection works including guide bunds. HQ DGBR (Br. Dte) will prepare tentative bridge scheme covering the bridge site, the type of structure with span arrangement and the location and type of foundations, deck level, the programme of sub-soil investiga- tion and the instructions for any further investigation, if the situation demands. HQ DGBR (Br. Dte) will clearly indicate the extent of exploration, number of bore holes, type of soundings, type of tests, number of tests, etc. so that the adequate data for detailed design and execution are obtained. Sub- Surface Investigation (SSI) will cover the entire length of the bridge and will also extend at either end for a distance of about twice the depth below the bed of the last main foundation. The sub-surface data will be compiled in the format placed at Appendix- Ill: Sub-Surface Data For Bridges. Plate Nos. 1, 2 and 3 will be applied for presentation of the bore hole data. The general guidelines for data collection are as given below:- (i) The engineering properties of the soil/rock. (i) The location and extent of soft layers and gas pockets, if any, under the hard founding strata. (ili), The geological condition like type of rock, faults, fissures or sub- sidence due to mining, porosity, ete. (iv) The ground water level. (Vv) Artesian conditions, if any. (vi) Quality of water in contact with the foundation. (vii) The depth and extent of scour. (vill) Suitable depth of foundation. (ix) The bearing capacity of the foundation. (x) Probable settlement and probable differential settlement of the foun- dations. (xi) Likely sinking or driving effort (xi) Likely Construction difficulties.6.10 71 The Comadr Task Force as well as HQ (P) will scrutinise data for the ac- curacy and will record where appreciable variation is noticed and sug- gest additional bores/soundings to establish a complete profile of the underlying strata. The decision regarding additional bores/soundings will be taken and conveyed by the HQ DGBR (8r. Dte). Special tests and exploration will be decided by HQ DGBR (Br.Dte) and conveyed to H@ (P) for collection of samples, classification, testing and reporting to HQ DGBR (Br. Dte). SPECIAL CASES The above instructions will be applied in general. For major bridges on turbulent rivers of longer spans and having variable foundation conditions, the HQ DGBR (Br.Die) may consider and lay down the detailed instruc- tions for survey, investigation, tests and exploration and specify the thrust areas/activities.ii) iii) iv) vi) vii) vill) xi) xil) xiii) xiv) xv) Appendix - I to T. |. No. 3 DATA OF ALTERNATIVE BRIDGE SITES Name of the river and highway. Name of the state, district and nearest identifiable town or village in rela- tion to the location of the sites under consideration. Map reference of the crossing or the approximate latitude and longitude. Location of the nearest G.1.S. Bench Mark with their levels. Nature of the River—perennial, tidal, snowfed, rainfed or flashy. Details of existing bridge or causeway or ferry site on the same fiver in the vicinity. North line and direction of flow of the stream. Index map of the catchment area (scale 1:50,000). . The catchment area for the river at the tentative site worked out in square km from G.1.S. maps. HLF.L. Information about velocity of flow in the stream, presence of floating debris, etc. Whether the site is on straight or curved reach? If on straight reach, the length of straight reach available on the u/s and d/s of the proposed bridge be given. Extent of afflux in case of existing bridge. Angle of skew, Names and approximate discharges of all tributary streams joining the river within @ reasonable distance u/s of the site under consideration.xvi) xvil) xvii) xix) Xx) xxi) xxii) xxiii) The approximate depth of the deepest scour hole below HFL. Details of meandering alluvial rivers. Sketch of rough cross-section of river to the scale, The bed material on the surface anda little below it as ascertained by probing with an iron rod. Material of the banks, whether any bank has been seriously eroded or silted at any point, rock outcrop or hard material jetting out from a bank causing deflection of the current, its position, etc. A sketch map showing the various sites investigated listing the advantages and disadvantages of each site with reasoned preferences given for the various sites in their order of merit. Sketch plan showing the rough alignment and condition of approaches on either side with topographical and built-up details. General notes about the availability of construction materials.Appendix - Il to T. 1. No. 3 HYDRAULIC DATA FOR SELECTED BRIDGE SITE 1, LOCATION (a) (6) (c) (d) (e) 0) Name of Road. Name of river/stream. Map reference of the crossing and year of its publication, Location of the nearest G.1.$. Bench Marks with their levels. Name of the State, District and nearest inhabited identifiable locality on either end of the crossing on the roads leading to the site. Give ap- proximate distance. Nearest rail head and its distance to the start of the road. Also indicate condition of the access road. 2. CLIMATIC DATA (a) (b) (c) Temperature (i) Annual temperature. (ii) Temperature range of the region. Rain Fall (i) Maximum in one hour in severest storm, (ii) Maximum in 24 hours. ii) Monthly and annual rainfall characteristics (append relevent meteorological records). (iv) Duration and frequency of a storm with average intensity. Snow fall () Monthly and annual snow fall characteristics (append relevant records), (i) Maximum snow fall in 24 hrs. (iii) Maximum intensity of snow melting (mm/hn. (iv) Whether site Is affected by avalanches, if so, give details. 3. HYDROLOGY (a) Catchment Characteristics: An index map of catchment area for the river at the proposed bridge site by tracing the ridge line of the watershed fromTopographical Survey of India Maps to a scale of 1:50,000 indicating fol- lowing details to be attached:- (i) Area in Sq Km/nectares computed by planimeter or tracing papergraphs. (il) Shapes (viz fan, pear, long, narrow, etc.). (ill) Slope (aa) Longitudinal (bb) Cross (iv) Surface characteristics (SMB, Ordinary soil, rocky, sandy, clayey, etc.). (v) Land use (afforestation, deforestation, urban areas, cultivable areas, etc). (vi) Storage areas (Lakes, Swamps, Tanks, Reservoirs, etc.). (vii) Distance from critical point to bridge site (L) in Kms. (vill) Fall in level from critical point to bridge site (H) in mtrs. 4, TOPOGRAPHY )) (b) (c) Index map to a scale of 1:50,000 (1 cm = 500 mtrs) showing the proposed location and alternative sites investigated, existing communication, proposed road, topography, physical features and towns, etc. in the vicinity and local sources of materials like stone, timber, gravel, sand and suitable camping areas, A contour survey plan of the stream to be attached indicating following details:- (i) The distance upstream and downstream of the proposed bridge site to be covered and scales to be adopted shall be as follows:- (aa) 100 mtrs for catchment areas less than 3 Sq Km: Scale 1:1,000. (bb) 300 mits for catchment areas 3 to 15 Sq Km: Scale 1:1,000. (cc) 1500 mtrs for catchment areas of more than 15 Sq Km: Scale 1:5,000. (ii) Two bench marks on either banks showing bearings and distances from distinguished reference points. (iii) All possible sites demarcated. (iv) North tine. (v) Suitable contour intervals (usually 2 m). (vi) Outline of low bank, high bank, water edges, island, etc. Asite pian to a suitable scale showing the details of the site selected and details of the stream upto a distance of at least 100 m on the upstream and down stream of the proposed bridge site and covering approaches to a sufficient distance which in case of a large bridge shall not be less than 500m on either side of the channel. The plan should include the fol- lowings:- (i) Name of the stream and road.di) Approximate outlines of the bank and channel HFL and LWL. (i) Direction of flow of water at maximum discharge. (iv) The alignment of the proposed and existing approaches, if any, to the bridge site. (v) The angle and direction of skew, if any. (vi) The names of nearest inhabited identifiable localities at either end of the crossing on the roads leading to the site. (vii) Location and RLs’ of the bench marks used as datums. (viii) Location of the longitudinal section and cross-section of road and stream taken within the area of the plan. (ix) Location of trial pits and borings with their identification numbers (x) Locations of all nallahs, temples, buildings, wells, rocky Outcrops and other obstruction which may affect the approach alignments 5. STREAM/CHANNEL CHARACTERISTICS (a) (6) Type of River (i) Seasonal or perennial. (ii) Braided, meandering or straight. (ii) Other classifications e.g. bouldery, flashy, tidal, well defined, etc. Water Level (i) Highest flood level (H.F.L) and its year of occurrence, delimiting the areas flooded, (aa) State if the flood level is affected by back water. (bb) A chart of period of HFL for as many years as the relevant data is available. (ii) Records of gauging stations. (ili) In case of tidal rivers include high tide level, low tide level, spring and neap tide levels, wave heights. (iv) Ordinary flood level (O.F.L). (v) Low water level (L.W.L): Indicate the period of the LWL to determine the feasibility of construction of intermediate piers and to examine provision of diversion during construction. - (vi) Afflux, if observed. 6. BED MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS (a) Nature of bed material (Sandy, silty, clayey, Bouldery, Rocky, efc.). (©) Rugosity coefficient (n). (c) Average size of material in erodible depth with the recommended value of, silt factor (f). Maximum surface velocity observed at proposed bridge site and cor- responding water level (observations on velocity of. flow can be made. bynoting the time taken by floats to pass two fixed points at a known dis- tance apart). : Observed maximum depth of scour with scour level, indicating obstruc- tions, if any. Whether floods carry floating debris such as big boulders and trees, if so, give size. The linear water way/effective linear waterway of channels shall be deter- mined as per clause 104 of IRC :5-1985. The formula for calculation afdischarge and silt factor as adopted by HQ DGBR (Br. Dté) is given in Appx-lV. The design discharge of the river at the proposed bridge site shall be taken as the maximum of the followings:- (a) Calculated from observed maximum surface velocity. (b) Determined as per clause 103 of IRC : 5-1985 in conjunction with article 7 of SP: 13-1986. Tne compilation of scour depth and foundation adopted by HQ DGBR (Br. Dte) is given in Appx-lv, The anticipated maximum scour depth shall be adopted as the greater of the followings:- (a) Observed scour depth at proposed bridge site. (b) Determined as per clause 703.2 of IRC: 78-1983 by Lacey's formula as applicable, (Note: Append calculation sheets, if any, in respect of Srl No.10, 1land12 above). A cross-section of the river at the proposed site to a scale of about 1:1,000 horizontally and 1:100 vertically giving following informations:- (a) Name of river, road and chainages. (b) The river bed levels upto the top of ‘panks and ground levels to a suf- ficient distance beyond the edge of the channel. (c) Nature of sub-soil in bed, bank, approaches and location of trial bores. (A) LWL, OFL and HFL. : (e) Low and high tide levels in case of tidal, rivers. Additional cross-sections of the stream at approximately 6 times the gap both upstream and down stream of the proposéd site from the bridge along the stream. (For smaller stream two additional cross-sections one upstream and the other downstream may be sufficient but for large rivers at least two on the upstream and two on the down stream should be taken). A longitudinal frossfsection of the stream, showing the proposed site, HFL, OFL, [WL and bed levels at suitable intervals along the approximate centre line of the deep water channel must be drawn. The horizontal scale shall be same as for survey plan and vertical scale not less than 1:1000.16. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED BRIDGE 1.5 x 2nd highest, select design discharge as 1.5 x 2nd highest. ie C) If Ist highest < 1.5x 2nd highest, select design discharge as Ist highest. NOTE: To apply above procedure, specially 2 (b), some times selected design discharge may be considerably lower than highest discharge. In such cases, Teasons of such wide variation should be verified by re-ex- amining various data to avoid any possible mistakes and design discharge may be fixed after critical examination of data. 3. Computation of Scour Depth a) Mean depth of scour, ‘dsm’ in metres (below the H.F.L.) 1 dsm = 1.34 {e . Kr For values of ‘Kt’, page 6 of IRC: 78-1983 may be referred. Where Dp = the discharge in Cumecs per metre width. Q+ X% of @ fad eS STS X= 30% for catchment areas upto 500 $q Km. 25 to 20% for catchment areas of 500 to 5000 $q Km. 20 to 10% for catchment areas of 5000 to 25000 $q Km. Less than 10% for catchment areas above 25000 Sq Km. ’b) Maximum Scour depth, Dm (i) In the vicinity of piers-2.00 dsm (ii) Near abutments — approach retained-1.27 dsm | — Scour allround-2.00 dsm now 4. Depth of Foundations, Dy Q) Erodible beds. Dt = Dm + 1/3 Dm Subject to condition that minimum 1/3 Dm is 2.00 m for arched bridges and 1.20 m for other bridges. b) Hard beds Dr = Dm + 0.6 m anchored into rock having ultimate crushing strength of 100 Kg/Cm? and above. = Dm + 1.5 m anchored into rock having ultimate crushing strength of 20 - 99 Kg/Cm?2Note : Scour depth and depth of foundation as calculated will be measured from the H.F.L. 5. Typicai Example of Slit Factor Calculation (Adopted from IRC Journal Vol. 12, No. 10, October 1984, Page 20) Calculations of Silt Factor for Sand and Location of Piers: Location Pier P. 3. Dia.of Weight Percentage Average Col. (Mean diameter sieve tetained © tetained size of (3) x (4) SOS mtr gms Sieve 1 2 3 4 5 6 2.360 293 29.30 - _ 1.180 313 31.30 1.7700 55.401 79.136/100=0.7913 0.600 172 17.20 0.8900 15.308 0.425 109 10.90 0.5125 5.586 0.300 39 3.90 0.3625, 1.413 0.150 59 5.90 0.2250 1.327 0.075 9 0.90 0.1125 0.101 Pon 6 0.60 - _ 1000 100.00 _ 79.136 Ki= 1L76Vii = 1.76 VO7OTS = 1.5656 1 2 3 4 5 6 2.360 49 4.90 = = 1.180 190 19.00 1.7700 33.630 78.424/100 = 0.7842 0.600 295 29.50 0.8900 26.255 0.425 253 25.30 0.5125 12.966 0.300 83 8.30 0.3625 3.008 0.150 104 10,40 0.2250 2.340 0.075 20 2.00 0.1125 0.225 Pan 6 0.60 es a 1000 100.00 — 78.424 Silt Factor, Kt = 1.76 vin = 1.76 VO.78A2 = 1.5587 Average silt factor = 19686 + 15887, oe 19887 _ 15622 ? The Sample calculation of mean diameter of silt is based on mathematical expression of averaging,©) B.m 96.000(metres) SeaLe: ss oS ess METERS, Notes: 1. The position of alternative sites marked AA’, BB’, CC’, DD’, etc. 2. The position of reference points marked a, b, ¢, d etc. be given with references ‘2 a permanent locationjbench mark by giving the bearing and distances so as to locate the position of bore holes independently. 3. Position of bore hole marked BH, etc. 4, Position of pits marked P,,etc. 5. The details are shown as a sample only.RL. OF GROUND BORE 75.00 (REF L ‘DATE COMPLETED: reams BORE HOLE No. 2 — — Pe sad. [dhs i PVEER g fermegfors er] grea | ET Uh 3 <|Pe3 Sy }e33 regilgtze [°° 3 asf at, swe 2 (E078) PRUE UE lad : EFlgn | | fF rome ores | a Vad ES] EAL ag az (EE t + MED BOR 7 Lid “l| wo = . rs fe a4 es eof ee wo fs [se a a aa anciemo warm Scone uve 9790 Tea}= | *} I : eee ted les Ss ss eds 1 |e] a - Prorosto fowwosnon weve ° fa sf [oad eo] 2 | ms mf foe - . wo seq egal 3 |at rs Ble |. - ss] so mee o@ | 0s = mila a Eehas olles = mallee 7 OO esc oo | woe " a [we Motes: S 7 1, Classification of soil shat beasper IS: 1408 4. Type of Core Barrel Used POL 1} Rieu wce 3 oie Sepes one Snes sarge & boston of rnd waa tse en UB = Untstrbed som 1 Shug Swng Surry help te Sn a Teal on Uncisturbed/Disturbed Sampto At. gm/em® Daneity 2 cRLpaLseeeeananeaed Tdentiel Vest Quick SheariComsolidated Quiek/Siow ete. 18, Woe of Machine Used in Bores -(NOTE:—SEPARATE SHEET TO BE GIVEN FOR EACH BORE HOLE/PIT) ‘OGBAT 1 to LamonaroRY TEST RESULTS : ti iyt Tesora] oe z ils sHala] e| Eta caus [2 Pe {5 | od | visa cescmrom or E29) =| 3 de 18 E frureomu ; Bi: ard t RQ ale] sid El] e]e peel. Sule al | laa foe & son, Bi P/E le Heslee] 12/209 Ta] & S812 Sieg [Est] So EE [pemarcs 2/2 ogi 512 135 ei} Fe1s [3] é 4/2518 21k ole [58 #|2 Bag] 8 | 2 33323) 2 gles 54/2 23 £ | £13 |S Ele Fes] | 4 feeleyl = SE SFee (82 [8s] 0 [2 + zl “1 roomy oRaneo saxo #9 Jere) oval vs leer . 1 | 4 | i | UY OF moma aster jr |ig-0|oug] ov vor aa With some AMM - CU OF niga pustiosTy ty for] mrlegliee wale geal ee fone asta $ COAy OF Mtn masticrTy wit eome AME AB, « re] onefese | earl om fwan ve fog] ot pean] of anf me | oop lsen re fry {rer|er| ow fea] eorfeiayleagfey | ee cuY Orman Ruswery win ‘Sout notes 1 f 19] os] se wef ay [oe "] POON GRADSO SARC lle TY we sro | | aE aye 3D STONE | fF ! | : | aa ne 1 i i t Lil — PROJECT POSITION OF BORE HOLE WITH REFERENCE TO REFERENCE POINT 8 BH b JOB NO Us as Tie ' BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SMEET BORE HCLE Wo. 2.RL IN METRES PLATE No LEFT BANK SUB SOll| PROFILE RIGHT Bank = DGBRT.L | soy os [ WL 85-00 bo REFERENCE WP Bue] ext. Bus [tor oF Bont wovs —E 10 2 RL 18:00 Phony cnoeo “500 OI ff or bet musney a ee 15 10 AWTICIPATED MAK. SCOUR LEVEL HOSOI 22" 6 50, 4s SE) > ROPOSED DISIGIED 42-10 FOUNDATION LEVEL 40, 3s, ue 5 % . 10 enne cs exes Notes: 1. Cross-section of River at AA’ looking down stresm 2. Numbere in the circles represent field S.P.T in values SUB SOIL PROFILE ‘3. The details chown are es a sample only