teanmpives tha’ < Ins wns subject 0 certa t formal approval of competent years of sorvieif Five yoars service ton completedy/The Competent Competent sacar Ribas. M.D, AWT. The seopondent wae directed vie letter eeINTHE COURT OF TAHIR ABBAS SIPRA, ADDL: SESSIONS JUDG "AXILA. Criminal ftevision No Date of institution Date of Decision Army Welfare Trust uu Vs. CRIMINAL REVISION tion 30, T 02.01,2020 passed by learned Magistrate S whereby application for Superdari petition filed by the petit was dismissed and allowed the Superdari potition f respondent 02 Abbreviate of the matter is that petitioner re 5 PC at Police rapat ws 550 C ation Sade vehicle Toyota corolla GLI Registration No.FH-379 Mod ‘Thereafter, petitioner and respondent No.1 both n respective applications for Superdari and learned M. eel led "bythe petitioner and accepted ’ petition filed by the respondent No, 03, After hearing the arguments and examining the recor learned Judicial Magistrate dismissed the Superdari petition filed by the petitioner and allowed the Superdari petition filed by th Fesponident. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner has moved the instant criminal revision petition. oa Learned counsel for the petit t impugned order igainst law and facts and is not sustainable that the petitioner is the owner of the above said vehicle; that there jis no other rival claimant of the same: that there is apprehension of damage and destruction of the vehicle, if remained at Police S TEST. n. He prayed for setting asideAWT VS... Amjad Saleem Khan ete ‘Criminal Revision No.1 /2000 ated 26.11.2019 bearing No.AF/OVHEVBuybac! ultimately the sai tracking system. The of the vehicle when the p through its representative ws oe 0 soece Petitioner AWT merely on the ground im {involved in any offence. Nothing was taken Whether the possession of the respondent. Anja wr awful or nots far asthe amount paid by the respond y ‘over the disputed car when the Competent Authority has | #efused to allow buyback policy in his favour and even the period