You are on page 1of 6

J Clin liltrasound 18:274-279, May 1990

Criteria for Transvaginal Sonographic


Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy
Shraga Rottem, MD, DSc, Israel Thaler, MD, Jacob Levron, MD,
Bezalel A. Peretz, MD, Joseph Itskovitz, MD, DSc,
and Joseph M. Brandes, MD

Abstract: Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed in 1150 patients suspected


of having an ectopic gestation. The criteria for transvaginal sonographic diagnosis of
ectopic pregnancy were established by targeted scanning of the pelvic organs and
spaces. Sonographic assessment of tubal pregnancy and its differential diagnosis were
based on six criteria: (1)the presence or absence of gestational structures within the
fallopian tube, (2) the presence or absence of amorphous material in a dilated fallo-
pian tube, f3) the presence or absence of indirect signs of ectopic pregnancy within the
pelvis, ( 4 ) the echogenicity of a suspected finding relative to the ovary, ( 5 ) the pres-
ence or absence of flow (of lacunar origin) within the suspected sonographic finding,
and 16) the relationship of a suspected sonographic sign to an intentionally displaced
ovary. The latter 3 criteria help differentiate between tubal gestation and a corpus
luteum. We believe these diagnostic criteria should be applied when performing
transvaginal sonographic scanning of patients suspected of having an ectopic gesta-
tion. Indexing words: Ectopic pregnancy, diagnosis of * Transvaginal sonographic
criteria

Despite impressive advances in the technology of based on sonographical findings is possible only
ultrasound imaging achieved by many manufac- when fetal echoes or heart motion are detected
turers, the traditional abdominal probes offer outside the uterine cavity (5% to 10% of the
limited and in many instances delayed informa- cases). Of the remaining cases indirect signs
tion on ectopic pregnancy. When scanning pa- such as an adnexal ring or mass, free fluid in the
tients suspected of having an extrauterine gesta- cul-de-sac, and an empty uterus will suggest an
tion, ultrasonography can contribute to a final ectopic implantation, especially if the p human
diagnosis mainly by “ruling in” an intrauterine chorionic gonadotropin (P-hCG) level is greater
pregnancy. Under certain conditions, e.g., gesta- than 6000 mIUimL. Although the combined use
tion less than 5 weeks to 6 weeks or vaginal of ultrasonography together with determination
bleeding, the sonographic examination may not of P-hCG level were reported to improve diagnos-
provide any useful information on the uterine tic accuracy, this would be applicable only in
content. Under other circumstances, such as in 17% of the patients, based on this discriminatory
patients with an ectopic pregnancy, the decidual zone. In a recent study’ the distribution of men-
reaction, possibly trapping some blood, may dem- strual ages at the time of surgery in 1985 was
onstrate a small ring-like structure- the observed t o be similar to that in 1975. This casts
pseudo-gestational sac-and erroneously indi- doubt on the often-cited opinion of earlier diag-
cate an ongoing intrauterine gestation. nosis that was attributed to the introduction of
The direct diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy these procedures. The vaginal probes, now
widely available, are undoubtedly changing the
scene in gynecological practice in general and in
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ram-
barn Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Is-
the workup of the ectopic pregnancy in particu-
rael Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. For reprints con- lar.2
tact S. Rottem, MD, DSc, Department of Obstetrics and Gy- High-frequency transvaginal probes (e.g., 6.5
necology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel 31096. MHz to 7.5 MHz) with their better resolution
274 0 1990 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
CCC 0091-2751190104274-06 $04.00
DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY 275

generate higher quality images than the tradi- ent characteristic pattern^.^ The first depends on
tional 3.5-5 MHz abdominal probes. The im- the capability of TVS to recognize gestational
proved images obtained involve all the target or- structures within the fallopian tube using the
gans and spaces which are scanned in the same criteria as in an intrauterine pregnancy.
workup of ectopic pregnancy.3 A systematic ap- Therefore one may rely upon the detection of
proach to the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic structures such as gestational sac, yolk sac, and
pregnancy based on the use of the transvaginal embryo within the fallopian tube when making
probe is presented after three years experience the diagnosis (Figures 1-3). According to our ex-
with 1150 patients suspected of having this pa- perience, in nearly 50% of the diagnosed tubal
thology. pregnancies one or more embryonic or extraem-
bryonic structures could be detected by the high-
frequency transvaginal probe. Moreover, fetal
TARGETORGANSANDSPACES
heartbeats were observed in nearly 23% of the
diagnosed tubal pregnancies. The second pattern
The Uterus is based on the recognition of a fallopian tube
The detection of an intrauterine gestational sac containing a n amorphous content. At surgery
can be achieved by the high-frequency transvag- this content was found t o be composed of blood,
inal probes as early as 16 days to 19 days after blood clots, and gestational material. This pat-
conception. The serum P-hCG level at this time tern was observed in nearly 40%) of the diag-
was found in our institution to range from 385 nosed tubal pregnancies. In about 10% of the di-
mIU/mL to 700 mIU/mL (First International agnosed tubal pregnancies, the diagnosis was
Reference). However, the detection of any given based on indirect signs such as an empty uterus,
early pregnancy structure may differ tempo- a positive serum p-hCG test, and detection of
rarily under the following conditions: blood andlor blood clots i n the cul de sac (the
1. Pronounced anteversion of the uterus. third pattern).
2. The presence of myomas, which may delay the
detection of the gestational sac by a week.
3. The gestational sacs of a multiple pregnancy Scanning the Cul-de-sac
may be detected sequentially a t one or two When a gestational sac is not detected within the
days intervals, while obvious deviation of the uterine cavity and the scan of the adnexae offers
serum p-hCG levels should also be considered no additional information, one should proceed to
in such cases. the examination of the cul-de-sac. Even small
The occurrence of a combined intrauterine and
extrauterine pregnancy is an extremely rare
event in the general population (1:30,000), but
this risk increases in the in vitro fertilization
programs where transfer of more than one em-
bryo is p e r f ~ r r n e d .Therefore
~.~ a thorough exam-
ination of the adnexa has to be undertaken in
this population, despite the presence of an in-
trauterine sac. When using abdominal probes,
one may find it difficult to differentiate a pseudo-
gestational sac from a true gestational sac. Us-
ing transvaginal sonography (TVS) these echoes
were found to originate from local blood clots or
from a central sonolucent area outlined by a
thick endometrium. If an intrauterine gestation
cannot be identified, one should proceed to scan
the fallopian tubes.

The Fallopian Tubes


The fallopian tube may be identified if outlined
by fluid or if its lumen contains a fluid phase
FIGURE 1. Cross-section of the Fallopian tube containing a 5 mm
(e.g., a gestational sac).' The recognition of tubal gestational sac at 5 weeks from the first day of the last menstrual
pregnancy by TVS can be based on three differ- period (LMP). (U, uterus; 0, ovary.)

VOL. 18, NO. 4, MAY 1990


276 ROTTEM ET AL.

amounts of free blood or blood clots are readily An abdominal and intraligamentous preg-
detected by the high-frequency transvaginal nancy may not be detected at all using a high-
probe. Blood clots appear as bizzarre-shaped frequency transvaginal probe due to the short fo-
floating structures that move about as the posi- cal length of this device (see the section on limi-
tion of the probe or the patient changes (Figure 4). tations).

Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancy DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS


Detection of an ectopic pregnancy in other sites
Corpus Luteum
than the fallopian tube is a challenge for sonog-
raphers even when using the transvaginal probe. Images of many pelvic structures may mimic an
Cornual pregnancy may not be directly recog- ectopic pregnancy but if there is one structure
nized because there is no unique discernable ab- that can be misdiagnosed as a tubal gestation,
normal feature and/or clotted blood in the cul-de- the corpus luteum of pregnancy is the one! The
sac. This is especially the case in a ruptured cor- corpus luteum may exhibit “many faces” such as
nual pregnancy. The sonographic diagnosis of a ring-like structure with or without internal
cervical pregnancy is facilitated by the proximity echoes, similar to the fallopian tube containing
of the probe to the area of interest. The implan- the gestational sac or blood clot. Three useful
tation of the chorionic vesicle within the cervical features differentiate a corpus luteum from a tu-
canal should be strongly suspected when a gesta- bal gestation.
tional sac is detected in this site (Figure 5a), The first is that the ovarian parenchyma is less
without involvement of the corpus uteri, which echogenic than the tubal gestation (see Figure 2).
only exhibits the appropriate decidual reaction In vitro comparison of fallopian tubes containing
(Figure 5b). a gestational sac with normal ovaries showed
While the available literature does not yet de- that the more echogenic image of the fallopian
scribe the TVS diagnosis of ovarian pregnancy, tube is due to the presence of the placental mate-
this pathology is potentially diagnosable. The rial.
ovary can be readily seen and if any of the gesta- The second observation is that tubal gestations
tional structures are detected within its paren- with a demonstrable yolk sac and an embryo
chyma the diagnosis would be established. show a peculiar flow within the lacunar

FIGURE 2. Cross-section of the Fallopian tube containing a 5 m m gestational sac and a yolk sac of 5 m m at 5
weeks and 3 days from the first day of the LMP.The ovary ( 0 )is also shown. Note the more echogenic
appearance of the tubal wall compared t o the ovarian parenchima.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND


DIAGNOSIS OF EC'rOPIC PREGNANCY 277

FIGURE 4. A blood clot (C) and free blood in the cul-de-sac. (U,
uterus.)
FIGURE 3. Cross-section of the Fallopian tube showing the gesta-
tional sac and a 1.1 c m embryo at 7 weeks and 3 days from the first
day of the LMP. The cephalic pole (arrow), the upper limb buds and
the embryonal trunk can be seen. mimic a tubal gestational content. However,
close observation usually reveals peristalsis of
the small bowel.
structures of the ectopic implanted placenta. This
flow is readily demonstrable by increasing the
Other Tuba1 Pathology
frame rate and by disabling filters (such as
frame average). In this case transvaginal sonog- A cross section of a hydro- or pyosalpinx may
raphy will display the trophoblastic circulation also mimic the tubal ring. However, the pus usu-
as a tubal lacunar flow that will not appear if the ally forms two distinct echogenic levels while the
probe is directed toward a corpus luteum. inflammed endosalpinx typically protrudes into
T h e third means o f differentiation is that by the tubal lumen.
pushing the questionable finding manually or
with the probe while maintaining the angle, the
Nabothian Cyst
entire ovary with its bulging corpus luteum is
displayed. I n case of a n ectopic gestation the ring- The novice sonographer may interpret a cervical
like structure of the tubal pregnancy will slide be- gland as an ectopic gestational sac. This struc-
side the ovary while being distinctly separated ture is usually centrally located, far from the ad-
f r o m it. When in doubt, one should apply the cri- nexa, and it is better visualized when the vagi-
terion dealing with the different echogenicity nal probe is withdrawn 2 cm t o 3 cm.
between the tubal placenta and the ovarian pa-
renchyma.
LIMITATIONS
A prudent approach to the management of ec-
Graafian Follicle
topic pregnancy should take into consideration a
This structure has a wall thinner than that of number of limitations of TVS in the workup of
the tubal ring and it is typically found within this condition. The main limitation is the risk of
the ovary, adjacent to similar structures of dif- obtaining a false positive diagnosis due to misin-
ferent size (i.e., other follicles). terpretation of one of the variants of the corpus
luteum. A false negative diagnosis may be made
in the case of an ectopic gestation that is located
The Small Bowel
outside the true pelvis or in the event of very
A cross section of a loop of the small bowel may small tubal gestation.
mimic a tubal ring and fecal material may Nearly a third of the false negatives in our se-
VOL. 18, NO. 4, M A Y 1990
278 ROTTEM ET AL.

FIGURE 5. (A1 Cross-section of the cervix showing a gestational sac (arrows) still implanted in the cervical channel. Note the prominent param-
etria. (6) Longitudinal scan of the corpus uteri showing an empty endometrial cavity and decidual reaction (arrows). Fractional D & C and histo-
pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of cervical pregnancy

ries were tubal pregnancies located outside the strate an intrauterine gestation, while in others
true pelvis while the remaining cases were small no sign of either intrauterine or extrauterine
ampular pregnancies that were smaller than pregnancy may be present. In about 13% of the
than 1 cm. One of these small tubal pregnancies patients suspected of having a tubal gestation,
was missed both by TVS and at laparotomy be- TVS will diagnose one of the three types of ec-
cause both procedures were performed at a very topic pregnancy. In the diagnostic process, one
early menstrual age. The tubal gestation contin- should consider the timing of the examination,
ued its natural course and the patient was the serum level of P-hCG and the natural dy-
treated with intrasmucular methotrexate in or- namics of an early gestation.
der to avoid a second surgical intervention. Two When confronted with a low level of p-hCG
weeks after the first laparotomy the patient had and no positive findings on TVS, it is imperative
a second laparotomy due t o rupture of the tube to perform a subsequent scan. If TVS is per-
and an intraperitoneal bleeding. One should also formed too early one could miss a normal intrau-
be careful in evaluating the amount of the intra- terine gestation. On the other hand, low levels of
abdominal bleeding by TVS. The Douglas pouch P-hCG may herald an abnormal condition such
is only one of the spaces into which the free blood as an early ectopic gestation, where an abnormal
may go, and the presence of a moderate amount hormonal pattern may further complicate the
of free blood in this compartment may be associ- situation. Most of our false negative cases had a
ated with the presence of a much larger quantity very low P-hCG level. Patients with high levels
of blood (up to sixfold) in other locations. of P-hCG and no evidence of an intra- or extrau-
When massive bleeding and clotting occurs, terine gestation at the TVS examination may
the vaginal probe will detect the free blood and not need an additional sonographical evaluation.
part of the clots, but accurate assessment of the Most of these cases will eventually be diagnosed
blood loss is impossible. as having- a complete or incomplete intrauterine
abortion by clinical, biochemical or histological
follow-up.
THE ROUTINE DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP
Based on our three years’ experience, TVS can be
TVS-AIDED THERAPY
incorporated into the routine diagnostic workup
of patients suspected of having an ectopic gesta- Transvaginal sonographically aided therapy of
tion. There is no need for special patient prepa- tubal pregnancy was recently suggested by vari-
ration. As expected, many patients will demon- ous authors. Instillation of methotrexate into the
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND
DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY 279

tubal gestation is one example.8 In this method, 2. Rottem S, Timor-Tritsch IE: Think ectopic, in
the antimitotic potential of this agent is ex- Transvaginal Sonography, Timor-Tritsch, IE &
ploited t o hamper the growth of the ectopic ges- Rottem S (Eds.). Elsevier, New York, 1987.
tation. Other authors describe the injection of 3. Rottem S, Timor-Tritsch IE, Thaler I: Assessment
KCl into the tubal sac.' A simple aspiration of of pelvic pathology by high frequency transvagi-
the gestational sac can also be attempted. All nal sonography, In Textbook of Obstetric and Gy-
necologic Ultrasound, Chervenack FA, Isaacson G,
these procedures should be followed by serial de- Campbell, S (Eds). Little, Brown, Boston, in press.
termination of p-hCG levels," by repeated sono- 4. Yovich JL, McColm SC, Turner SR, Matson PL:
grams, and by clinical evaluation. Bleeding or Heterotopic pregnancy from in vitro fertilization.
rupture of the ectopic gestation may occur fol- J Zn Vitro Fertil Emb Trans 2:146, 1985.
lowing these procedures, therefore careful obser- 5 . Bearman DM, Vieta PA, Snipes RD, et al: Hetero-
vation is needed. topic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and em-
bryo transfer. Fertil Steril 45719, 1986.
CONCLUSIONS 6. Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S: Transvaginal ultra-
sonographic study of the fallopian tube. Obstet Gy-
The availability of quantitative P-hCG and the necol 70:424, 1987.
latest sophistication of ultrasound technology 7. Rottem S, Timor-Tritsch IE, Thaler I, Brandes
have made possible the noninvasive early diag- JM: Classification of tubal pregnancy using a 6.5
nosis of ectopic pregnancy. The major goal is MHz transvaginal probe. Obstet Gynecol, submit-
early intervention, prior to substantial tubal ted for publication.
damage. Because high-frequency TVS enables 8. Feichtinger W, Kemeter P: Conservative treat-
recognition of this disease at its early stages, cli- ment of ectopic pregnancy by transvaginal aspira-
tion under sonographic control and methotrexate
nicians should rely on this method with higher
injection. Lancet 1:381, 1987.
confidence compared to its transabdominal coun- 9. Timor-Tritsch IE, Baxi L, Peisner DB: Transvagi-
terpart. Today, in many departments, TVS has nal salpingocentesis: A new technique for treating
become a first-line diagnostic test for any patient ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:459,
who is suspected or having an ectopic pregnancy. 1989.
10. Adoni A, Mildwidsky A, Hurvitz A, et al: Declin-
REFERENCES ing hCG levels: An indicator for expectant ap-
proach in ectopic pregnancy. Znt J Fertil 31:40,
1. Stock RJ: The changing spectrum of ectopic preg- 1986.
nancy. Obstet Gynecol 71:885, 1988.

VOL. 18, NO. 4, MAY 1990

You might also like