Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Bacteriophages are bacterial viruses. Bacteriophages replicate inside their target host whether this is in
planktonic or biofilm forms. Here, we describe the methods used to control readily formed biofilms using
bacteriophages.
1 Introduction
Gianfranco Donelli (ed.), Microbial Biofilms: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1147,
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0467-9_20, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
277
278 Sanna Sillankorva and Joana Azeredo
2 Materials
3 Methods
3.2 Concentration This protocol was adapted from Sambrook and Russell [10]; how-
and Purification of ever, it includes some minor modifications and does not include an
Bacteriophage Lysates ultracentrifugation step.
1. To a 200 mL bottle, add 100 mL of bacteriophage lysate
(see Subheading 3.1 step 9) and DNase I and RNase A (1 μg/mL
each).
Bacteriophage as Anti-biofilm Strategy 281
3.3 Biofilm 1. Add to a 24-well microplate 1 mL of sterile LB media (see Note 4).
Formation on 2. Add 10 μL of a bacterial culture adjusted to an OD600 of 1.0.
Microplates
3. Incubate at appropriate temperature conditions and under
agitation (120 rpm or at static conditions (0 rpm)) during the
desired period of time (e.g., 24 h—7 days), replacing the
media every 12 h to remove planktonic bacteria and enhance
biofilm formation.
4. At the end of the desired biofilm formation period, remove all
media.
5. Wash twice the wells with 1 mL of sterile LB media.
6. Add 1 mL of LB media.
7. Use a cell scraper to scrape the biofilm from the well surface.
8. Put the 24-well microplate on a sonication bath for 30 min.
9. Quantify the viable cells present in the biofilms as described
below (see Subheading 3.7) (see Note 9).
282 Sanna Sillankorva and Joana Azeredo
3.5 Biofilm Control After quantifying the numbers of viable cells in the biofilms, in at
with Bacteriophages least three independent assays performed in triplicate, the efficacy
of bacteriophages for biofilm control can be evaluated. In order to
maintain the infection parameters identical along the experiments,
a constant initial multiplicity of infection (MOI) must be used.
MOI is calculated according to the number of bacteriophages per
number of viable host cells, and, for instance, an MOI of 1 repre-
sents that there is 1 bacteriophage to each host cell (see Note 10).
1. After biofilm formation and washing (Subheading 3.3 step 4),
add 950 µL of LB media and 50 µL of bacteriophage at a
proper concentration in order to have the desired constant
multiplicity of infection (MOI).
2. Incubate at the proper temperature during at least 4 h (see
Note 11).
3. Take samples (Fig. 1a) to quantify the numbers of bacterio-
phages and viable cells (see Subheadings 3.6 and 3.7), respec-
tively, present in the planktonic stage (see Note 12).
4. Remove the spent media and wash twice with sterile LB media.
5. Add 1 mL of sterile LB media.
6. Use a cell scraper to scrape the biofilm from the surface
(Fig. 1b).
7. Put the 24-well microplate on a sonication bath for 30 min.
8. Take samples to quantify the numbers of bacteriophages and
viable cells (see Subheadings 3.6 and 3.7), respectively, present
in the biofilm stage (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1 Final stage of a biofilm control with bacteriophages. (a) Removal of samples
to quantify the bacteriophages and bacteria in the planktonic phase; (b) using a
cell scraper to scrap the biofilm; (c) removal of samples to quantify the bacterio-
phages and bacteria that were present only in the biofilm phase
3.7 Biofilm Cell 1. In 96-well plates, serially dilute the bacterial samples in sterile
Enumeration saline solution (20 µL of sample in 180 µL of SM buffer).
2. Add a drop of 20 µL of sample on an agar plates containing LB.
3. Allow the drop to dry completely.
4. Incubate overnight at the proper growth temperature.
5. Count the colonies formed in the drop of the dilution with
3–30 colonies.
6. Calculate the number of viable cells using Eq. 2:
No. of colonies ´ Dilution factor
Nr. of viable cells (CFU per mL ) = (2)
Volume of sample ( mL )
4 Notes
References
1. Ackermann HW (2009) Phage classification 7. Sillankorva S (2008) The use of bacteriophages
and characterization. Methods Mol Biol 501: to control biofilms. PhD thesis in chemical and
127–140 biological engineering, University of Minho
2. Summers WC (2012) The strange history of 8. Sillankorva S, Neubauer P, Azeredo J (2010)
phage therapy. Bacteriophage 2:130–133 Phage control of dual species biofilms of
3. Pirnay JP, De Vos D, Verbeken G et al (2011) Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus len-
The phage therapy paradigm: prêt-à-porter or tus. Biofouling 26:567–575
sur-mesure? Pharm Res 28:934–937 9. Curtin JJ, Donlan RM (2006) Using bacterio-
4. Cornelissen A, Ceyssens PJ, T'Syen J et al phages to reduce formation of catheter-
(2011) The T7-related Pseudomonas putida associated biofilms by Staphylococcus epidermidis.
phage phi15 displays virion-associated bio- Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1268–1275
film degradation properties. PLoS One 6: 10. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular
e18597 cloning—a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold
5. Sillankorva S, Oliveira R, Vieira MJ et al (2004) Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring
Bacteriophage Phi S1 infection of Pseudomonas Harbor, NY
fluorescens planktonic cells versus biofilms. 11. Adams MH (1959) Bacteriophages.
Biofouling 20:133–138 Interscience Publishers, INC, New York
6. Hadas H, Einav M, Fishov I, Zaritsky A (1997) 12. Mazzocco A, Waddell TE, Lingohr E, Johnson
Bacteriophage T4 development depends on RP (2009) Enumeration of bacteriophages
the physiology of its host Escherichia coli. using the small drop plaque assay system.
Microbiology 143:179–185 Methods Mol Biol 501:81–85