Professional Documents
Culture Documents
250
151 have seen the lows of 114 and high of 243 during the one
year period of 1st Oct 2005 to 26th Oct 2006. During this period
230
it has generated the returns of 24%. After touching the low of
210 114 on 31st Oct’05 we can observe a bull run till 11th May’06
190
when it reached high of 243. This Bull Run was followed by the
sudden fall due to the global meltdown. In the next two days the
170
script shed 30 points and then within next one month it shed
150 100 points in total. After reaching 143 on 14th Jun’06 again the
130 script has been moving north with certain hiccups and
reached 187 by 26th Oct’06.
110
10/3/05
11/3/05
12/3/05
1/3/06
2/3/06
3/3/06
4/3/06
5/3/06
6/3/06
7/3/06
8/3/06
9/3/06
10/3/06
Futures Prices: Data for the period 1st Oct’05 to 26th Oct’06 was
collected. The data was arranged in a format where for every
date there were three contracts were active. If we talk about
liquidity in futures then it was observed as highest activity took
Futures Contract - Expiry 28-Sep-06
place in the near month (M0) contract followed by the next
month (M1) contract and then farthest month (M2) contract. As
much of the data for the farthest month contract had no turnover 187
only the M0 and M1 contracts were studied.
182
For example in the graph adjoining, we can see that for the
futures contract expiring on 28-Sep-06, the Spot and M0 prices 177
converge when the time to maturity becomes zero. Where as
there exist a spread between spot and M1 prices.
172
Having a look at the basis and days to expiry for all the contracts
it was observed that barring few cases, in all the cases the basis 167
was strengthening as the contract reached maturity. When 27 24 23 22 21 20 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 3 2 1 0
the script was at its peaks the volatility in the basis was very
Spot M 0 (Active Month) M 1 (Next month)
high. The basis for the active month has never been greater
than 2% of the spot price. Theoretical cost of futures obtained
Futures Contract - Expiry 31-Aug-06
by using cost of carry model and the actual futures prices
0 showed the correlation of 99.9%. Thus it can be fairly concluded
that the cost of carry model is applicable to this script. The
34
30
28
24
22
20
15
13
-0.2
limitations while applying the model is that the interest rate that
-0.4
is assumed (3 Month T-Bills) is not the rate at which the funds
are available in the market. This increases the cost of carry and
-0.6 reduces the effective spread between the theoretical futures
Basis
th
If we have a look at the contract that expires on 24 Nov’05 we 0.5
can see that the futures price is undervalued by 2% on 11th Nov
compared to its futures price calculated using Cost of Carry 0
Model. This happens to be the highest exploitable arbitrage
3-Nov
6-Nov
9-Nov
12-Nov
15-Nov
18-Nov
21-Nov
24-Nov
28-Oct
31-Oct
1
Time value Call Option - 31-Aug-06 Strike Price 170 Call Option: Data for the period 1st Oct’05
to 26th Oct’06 was collected. During this
period data for all strike prices was
10 collected. It can be observed that the
9 volatility has been highest in the
8 contract of Nov’05 where one can
Time Value (Rs)
9
7
3
1
see time value of call option (expiry 31-
Days to Expiry Aug-06 at the strike price of 170) plotted
against the days to expiry and the decay in
time value is strikingly visible.
Decay in time value was seen to approach zero in the case where the spot price is approaching the strike price at
the end of the contract. In the cases where the strike price is more than the spot price approaching expiry the time value
is positive, where as in the other case where the strike price is less than the spot price the time value become negative.
34
30
28
24
22
20
16
14
10
It was observed that the Time decay of an option began to accelerate in the last 60 to 30 days before expiry. The
greater was the certainty about an option's expiry value; the lower was the time value. Conversely, the greater was the
uncertainty about an option's expiry value, the greater was the time value.
Company: Hindalco
st th
Period Studied: 1 Oct 2005 to 26 Oct 2006
Disclaimer: Entire analysis is an academic assignment and is the opinion of the author and should not be construed as an
investment advice. The author is not responsible for any positions taken in the market based on the above analysis.