the second chapter will be devoted to the romanticizing claims  against Truman and their

potential reasoning I will start with romanticizing as result of postmodernism where the
Postmodernism theory  is grounded on the premise  that people are not built on what they
choose to be, but are in fact a reflection of the noise, variables, and environments that
surround them. It is the idea that the ‘self’ is not created through choice but that it is a
reflection of what is around them. Simply put, serial killers do not naturally develop into
serial killers, but create a persona reflecting what is outside them. Then romanticising as
result of Truman bias discussing Truman involvement focusing on the concept of
homosexuality as the base of dick and capote bias then romanticizing as a result of the
genre itself since the book belongs to the non-fictional novel or new journalism I will
attribute the romanticizing to the technique used .that’s the plan in general of course not
fixed because the nuance will be different with new information the third chapter will be
the effect of the romanticizing both positive and negative the deconstructing of human
binary then the effect on the depiction of reality  I thought about revolutionising the field
of forensic psychiatry and redefining criminal responsibility 
BUT I’m not sure I’m taking more time than what I initially anticipated for I go through
various reading to get a good grasp.
Much of my appreciation sir have a lovely day and when is the viva thank you

References
1. Brann, E. T. H. (1992). What is Postmodernism?, The Harvard Review of
Philosophy, Spring,
2. Copan, P. (2007). What is Postmodernism?, North American Mission Board,
found in http://www.4truth.net/ on October 23, 2012.
3. Delanty, G. (2000). Modernity and Postmodernity, Sage Publications, London.
4. Lemert, C. (1997). Postmodernism is Not What You Think, Blackwell
Publishers, UK.
5. Mirchandani, R. (2005). Postmodernism and Sociology: From the
Epistemological to the Empirical, Sociological Theory, Vol.23, No.1, pp. 86-
115.
6. Rosenau, P.M. (1993). Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights,
Inroads, and Intrusions, Princeton University Press, NJ.
7. Shaikh, S. A. (2009). Islamic Philosophy and the Challenge of Post
Modernism: A Sociological Perspective, MPRA Paper No. 23001, found in
http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/23001/ on November 08, 2012.
Vol: 4 Issue: 3 March 2017 Excellence International Journal of Education and Research ISSN 2349-
8838
Dr. Sheeba Page 189
8. Spiro, M. E. (1996) Postmodernist Anthropology, Subjectivity, and Science. A
Modernist Critique. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 38(1). 759-
780.The romanticizing is inevitable