You are on page 1of 62

INTERSECTIONAL FRAMES AND DIGITAL STORYTELLING

___________________________

A Thesis

Presented to the Faculty in Communication and Leadership Studies

School of Professional Studies

Gonzaga University

___________________________

Under the Supervision of Dr. Pavel Shlossberg

__________________________

In Partial Fulfillment

Of the Requirements for the Degree

Master of Arts in Communication and Leadership Studies

___________________________

By

Eastyn M. Baleto

May 2020
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

We the undersigned, certify that we read this thesis and approve it as adequate in scope and
quality for the degree Master of Arts in Communication and Leadership Studies.

____________________________________________________________
Thesis Director

Gonzaga University

MA Program in Communication and Leadership Studies

2
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstract
Chapter 1: Introduction 4
Importance of the Study 5
Statement of Purpose 5
Definitions of Terms Used 6
Organization of Remaining Chapters 8

Chapter 2: Review of Literature 9


Philosophical and Ethical Assumptions 9
Theoretical Basis 10
The Literature 11
Significance/Rationale 22
Specific Purpose 22
Research Questions 23

Chapter 3: Scope and Methodology 24


Scope of the Study 24
Methodology 25
Data Analysis 27
Methodological Choices 27
Ethical Considerations 28

Chapter 4: The Study 30


Introduction 30
Results of the Study 30
Discussion 42

Chapter 5: Summaries and Conclusions 52


Limitations of the Study 52
Recommendations for Further Study 52
Conclusions 53

References 57

Appendices 60

3
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Abstract

The overall purpose of the study is concerned with how imagery and nonverbal cues in

framing combined with lyrics and tone in hip-hop music videos impact the interpretation of a

message. It is also important to examine how intersectionality impacts the reception of such

frames but also forms individual frames for the interpretation of messages. The theories that

informed this work are that of the concepts of visual & non-verbal cues in framing,

intersectionality, and digital storytelling but also previous studies regarding communication as a

social influence. A semi-structured survey/questionnaire was conducted via email with 10

volunteer teachers from Lafayette Elementary School. The hip-hop music video analyzed in the

current study was This is America by Childish Gambino. The implications of our findings

allowed us to conclude images and non-verbal cues in framing do impact how a message is

interpreted. Our findings improved our understanding of the presence of intersectional identities

and how they inform the reception of frames with the combination of lyrics and images as

compared to the lyrics alone. Future students can utilize this work to instigate further

investigation of visuals and non-verbal cues in journalism and breaking news or by focusing on

how a specific demographics intersectional identity informs the reception of frames in a different

shape of media than music videos.

Keywords: visuals, non-verbal cues, framing, intersectionality, digital storytelling, hip-

hop, social influence

4
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Chapter 1: Introduction

Importance of the Study

This study is important and has real world application because these findings demonstrate

the importance of understanding the benefit of visuals and non-verbal cues in framing as an

avenue in which communication as a social influence may be enhanced and reach a wider, more

diverse audience. Further, these findings validate the concept of a progressive mindset as

beneficial in the process of comprehension because it opens receivers’ minds to different

intersectional experiences they may not have inhabited or are considered outside their

experience. Finally, this study is significant because the presence of communication as social

influence shows how individuals can share their intersectional experience through digital

storytelling, thus enlightening the dominant society about important social issues experienced by

members of the marginalized and disenfranchised.

Statement of Purpose

The concept of how images and non-verbal cues impact the reception of messages in

music videos is an area in extant research that warrants further investigation. This study is

concerned with how imagery and nonverbal cues in framing combined with lyrics and tone in

hip-hop music videos impact the interpretation of a message. It is also important to examine how

intersectionality impacts the reception of such frames but also informs individual frames for the

interpretation of messages. To make a claim as such, requires clarifying the concepts of visual &

non-verbal cues in framing, intersectionality, and digital storytelling but also analyzing previous

studies regarding communication as a social influence. After completing these tasks, one can

make an argument to render the claim plausible.

5
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Definitions of Terms Used

Visuals “constitute a largely analogical system of communication […] the relationship

between most words and their meanings is purely a matter of social convention, whereas the

relationships between images and their meanings are based on similarity or analogy” (Messaris

& Abraham, 2001as cited by D’Angelo & Kuypers, 2010, p. 234). Furthermore, “visual images

do not allow a communicator to make explicit claims, such as casual statements or comparisons.”

(D’Angelo & Kuypers, 2010, p. 235).

Non-verbal cues include communication between people using body movement, body

positioning, distinctions of the voice, facial expressions, features of dress, and choice in the

movement of objects, that do not have a direct verbal translation (Smith, 2014). Non-verbal cues

“provide semantic information, they may enhance comprehension through adding more semantic

features at the point of processing the message” (Folger & Woodall, 1982 as cited by Abraham &

Appiah, 2006, p. 188).

Framing theory is “selecting some aspects of a perceived reality and making them more

salient in a communicating text, in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition,

causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment recommendation” (Entman, 1993 as

cited by Scheufele, 1999, p.107). Communication scholars define framing as “the framing and

presentation of events and news in the mass media can thus systematically affect how recipients

of the news come to understand these events” (Price, Tewksbury, & Powers, 1995, as cited by

Scheufele, 1999, p. 107).

Intersectionality consists of “the inter-locking ways in which social structures produce

and entrench power and marginalization, and by drawing attention to the ways that existing

6
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

paradigms that produce knowledge and politics often function to normalize these dynamics.”

(Carbado, 2013). Cho et al. (2013) define intersectionality as the idea that when it comes to

thinking about how inequalities persist, categories like gender, race, and class are best

understood as overlapping and mutually constitutive rather than isolated and distinct (Cho et al.,

2013).

The concept of digital storytelling is defined by Oliva et al. (2017) as “a persuasive

narration of a story; a significant context for the understanding of a story; text, images, and

graphics that attract or expand the emotions found in narrative; voice, music and sound effects

that reinforce themes; and mechanisms that invite reflection and target-audience participation”

(Oliva et al., 2017, p. 463). Digital Storytelling “enhances traditional oral story-telling with

images, music, and the text” (Leopold, 2010, p.187). Per Robin (2013), Digital storytelling can

be defined as “the idea of combining the art of telling stories with a variety of multimedia,

including graphics, audio, video, and Web publishing” (Robin, 2013).

Hip-hop is identified by Akom (2009 as “a liberatory practice rooted in the long history

of the Black freedom struggle and the quest for self-determination for oppressed communities

around the world” (Akom, 2009, p. 53). Akom (2009) concluded “hip hop as a vehicle to explore

social justice themes such as police brutality, Black incarceration, misogyny, homophobia,

racism, sexism, white supremacy, Black nationalism, and commodification while articulating the

demands for social justice.” (Akom, 2009, p. 58).

Social influence is defined “as change in belief, attitude, or behavior, or some

combination of these three factors, that occurs as a function of exposure to an external message

or series of external messages” (Boster as cited by Shepherd et al., 2006, p.180). Essentially “a

7
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

potential impact of the frames people use to interpret conflicts, is the mobilization for collective

action aimed at social change” (Gamson, 1985 as cited by Scheufele, 1999, p.113-114).

Organization of Remaining Chapters

A review of communication theory relevant to this study as well as existing research

involving the selected variables is presented in Chapter 2. The specific research questions

selected for this study are noted as well. Chapter 3 lays out the methods used to collect and

analyze the data, and provides background and reliability statistics on the selected scales. The

results of the study, including descriptive statistics and thematic analysis data, are presented in

Chapter 4, with discussion regarding implications. Finally, study limitations and

recommendations for future research are included in Chapter 5.

8
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Chapter 2: Review of Literature

Philosophical and Ethical Assumptions

Personal philosophies play a role in education by keeping our work or ideas original to us

creating a positive ethical culture in education but also society. This logical analysis of the

principles underlying conduct, thought, knowledge, and the nature of the universe, serve as

social cognition to understand constructs of society. According to Trevino (2006), "ethical

culture as a subset or slice of the organization's overall culture that can moderate the relationship

between an individual's moral reasoning level and ethical/unethical behavior," this challenges

individuals to interpret information originally and form their perspective of the world (Brown &

Trevino, p. 601). Thus, developing a progressive society with diverse opinions and perspectives.

Young individuals tend to be passive thinkers, not realizing the importance of seeking out

information on their own until, questioning everything, and developing their personal perspective

on any subject. When confronted by media produced with the sole purpose to instigate a

behavior or influence a certain belief, the ability to form their own perspective is essential. When

an ethical leader is producing this media to influence, individuals are more likely to be receptive

if the producer “demonstrates care and concern and treat others fairly are attractive to followers

and garner positive attention […] and are credible because they are trustworthy and practice what

they preach” (Brown & Trevino, p. 597). The messages they receive are distributed by an ever-

growing number of diverse platforms, it is up to these individuals to develop an ethical culture

providing them the educational perspective to navigate these many messages and platforms

successfully, but also the ethical foundation to do so in service of the common good.

9
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Theoretical Basis

It has been said that the role of the media in influencing the way people understand

messages from media distributors, is very apparent in American society. Key variables in this

research include media’s capacity to affect the character, behavior, or belief of an individual is

present not just in journalism but also in the advertising and entertainment industry. Media’s

influence can be accidental, but many communication scholars would argue their influence is

intentional. Despite the prevailing motivations, media’s effect is unavoidable. Journalists and

public relations practitioners are aware of media’s presence in the message-receiver process and

are taught how to use it to their advantage. Framing theory is “selecting some aspects of a

perceived reality and make them more salient in a communicating text, in such a way as to

promote a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment

recommendation” (Entman, 1993 as cited by Scheufele, 1999, p.107). Although mass media is

yet to predict how audiences will accept the point of view and opinions in media content, they

have been effective in deciding the focus and significance of a media report through framing

theory.

Examining the research problem, we understand framing occurs in the way media

presents the facts of a narrative so that the audience is provided with a particular state of values

concerning which judgments and interpretations can be made. For instance, media may report on

a political issue or event, with “radical” Republican beliefs being portrayed. By reporting in such

a way, media has set a basic standard for future reporting on an issue but ultimately has bestowed

a frame through which an audience is to interpret a story. Framing is important because the way

something is presented to the public influences the choices the audience makes about how to

interpret a message.

10
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

The Literature

Visual and Non-verbal Cues in Framing

Previous research from Scheufele & Iyengar (2014) and Abraham & Appiah (2006) has

provided the related exploration for visual and non-verbal cues in framing relevant to the current

study. Visual and non-verbal cues have been used in framing to encode messages without the

presence of text. Non-verbal cues include communication between people using body movement,

body positioning, distinctions of the voice, facial expressions, features of dress, and choice in the

movement of objects, that do not have a direct verbal translation (Smith, 2014). These elements

of non-verbal cues find their place in the context of framing because “nonverbal cues provide

semantic information, they may enhance comprehension through adding more semantic features

at the point of processing the message” (Folger & Woodall, 1982 as cited by Abraham &

Appiah, 2006, p. 188). Abraham & Appiah (2006) study of nonverbal cues provides applicable

research to the discussion of message interpretation relating to framing by applying the dual code

theory, a theory that helps to explain “the observations made that in dual-modal presentations of

information pictorial juxtapositions with verbal messages can enhance the memory for and

comprehension of verbal information” (Burgoon, 1985; Folger & Woodall, 1982; Gunter, 1987;

Stone, 1987 as cited by Abraham & Appiah, 2006, p. 187).

Framing is media supplying a center of attraction and atmosphere for telling a story,

influencing how the public will interpret and understand it. Communication scholars define

framing as “the framing and presentation of events and news in the mass media can thus

systematically affect how recipients of the news come to understand these events” (Price,

Tewksbury, & Powers, 1995 as cited by Scheufele, 1999, p. 107). Therefore, “nonverbal cues

thus represent an ecologically valid test of framing effects on mass opinion […] Most things

11
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

which one makes a judgment about or has a feeling toward in the political domain are effectively

laden; nonverbal frames, therefore, represent a potentially more powerful means of influencing

political attitudes and actions.” (Scheufele & Iyengar, 2014, p. 12). Media can either legitimize a

narrative or trivialize a whole story or certain components of it, by emphasizing a portion of the

narrative. Therefore, it is important to note, “visual images constitute a largely analogical system

of communication […] the relationship between most words and their meanings is purely a

matter of social convention, whereas the relationships between images and their meanings are

based on similarity or analogy” (Messaris & Abraham, 2001as cited by D’Angelo & Kuypers,

2010, p. 234). Thus, there is this notion as Americans, that our relationship between the reality

mediated and the truth, do not always intersect with each other.

Framing in videos contribute to this notion because “images, unlike words, are indexical-

they are treated as direct pointers, as opposed to constructed representations of reality”

(D’Angelo & Kuypers, 2010, p. 217). Furthermore, “visual images do not allow a communicator

to make explicit claims, such as casual statements or comparisons.” (D’Angelo & Kuypers,

2010, p. 235). This conceptual distinction follows Scheufele’s (1999) study of framing as media

effects suggesting there are two concepts of framing to be specified: “media frames and

individual frames” (Scheufele, 1999). Gamson and Modigliani (1987), conceptually defined a

media frame as “a central organizing idea or story line that provides meaning to an unfolding

strip of events . . . The frame suggests what the controversy is about, the essence of the issue”

(Gamson & Modigliani, 1987 as cited by Scheufele, 1999, p. 106). Media frames can be

distinguished as the scheme in which media is presented, whereas individual frames are that in

which media is comprehended (Scheufele, 1999, p. 106). Entman (1993) theoretically explains

individual frames as “mentally stored clusters of ideas that guide individuals’ processing of

12
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

information” (Entman, 1993 as cited by Scheufele, 1999, p. 107). Intersectional experiences or

long-standing political views have the capacity to shape a persons’ lens or effect an individual’s

frame in which they process information.

There are many examples in our country demonstrating both media frames and individual

frames. Particularly any narrative that displays an honest depiction of inequality and racial bias

in this America, is greeted with extensive denial and opposition. The two concepts proposed in

the framing theory are: who tells the story first and how is the audience influenced. Framing in

media focuses on the significance of how gatekeepers portray a story and what they deem salient.

D’Angelo & Kuypers (2010) includes a great example of how visual images do not allow a

communicator to make explicit, casual statements or comparisons,

“For example, everyone knows anecdotal evidence about the impact of images from

September 11, or the chilling impression of mental illness conveyed in the video diary of

the Virginia Tech shooter. More ordinary news events include the stereotypical visuals

laced with racial and gender stereotypes that would never pass newsroom muster if

communicated in words. In these cases, it is more than a saying that pictures show what

words could never convey” (D’Angelo & Kuypers, 2010, p. 235).

Digital Storytelling

The concept of digital storytelling has been discussed in many ways, Oliva et al. (2017)

define digital storytelling or “digital narratives” as “a persuasive narration of a story; a

significant context for the understanding of a story; text, images, and graphics that attract or

expand the emotions found in narrative; voice, music and sound effects that reinforce themes;

and mechanisms that invite reflection and target-audience participation” (Oliva et al., 2017, p.

463). A modern theory such as the work of Lisa Leopold (2010), Digital Media Stories for

13
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Persuasion, suggests the concept of Digital Storytelling “enhances traditional oral story-telling

with images, music, and the text” (Leopold, 2010, p.187). Per Robin (2013), Digital storytelling

can be defined as “the idea of combining the art of telling stories with a variety of multimedia,

including graphics, audio, video, and Web publishing” (Robin, 2013). This multimedia helps the

author convey their point of view and perspective, as well as express emotional content about a

serious issue that comes alive in a powerful and personal way and relates the audience to the

story (Robin, 2013). If an audience can relate to a story the greater influence the message of a

story will have on a viewer. Oliva et al. (2017) advocate digital storytelling “helps us to

understand the individual experience and to develop a perception of the world around us” (Oliva

et al., 2017, p. 463). Digital storytelling provides a way to individualize a story to help the

audience comprehend the context but also gives just enough content to communicate the story

without overwhelming the viewer (Leopold, 2010).

The discussion of digital Storytelling in music videos is another concept significant to

this study. Oliva et al. (2017), attempts to unpack storytelling in the context of video clips

mentioning, “storytelling in video clips becomes more complex if we analyze some important

remarks such as the music timing, the advertising and marketing of the songs, and the artist’s

image and performance” (Oliva et al., 2017, p. 465). A central element the current study aims to

analyze is the role visuals play in the enhancement of the language in the song. Oliva et al.

(2017) highlights video clip language in that it is typically “fast, active, based on slow or fast

rhythmic arrangements. It is necessary to pay attention to the connection between the rhythm of

the songs and the visual images” (Oliva et al., 2017, p. 465).

Framing in the context of digital storytelling is relevant to our study because the frame

guides the audience from the larger narrative into one or more supporting narratives within one

14
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

piece of media. As identified by Alexander (2011), “a simple photograph does not imply a

narrative in itself. It needs to be introduced in a time sequence, in a logic association with other

sequences” (Alexander, 2011 as cited by Oliva et al., 2017, p. 466). The process of constructing

a digital story shapes communication, perspective, visual and audio literacy. Frames assist the

communicator in engaging with their audience establishing a lens in which the audience can

interpret a perspective and articulate visual and audio components. Friedland and Zhong (1996)

summarized the perspective that frames serve as “the bridge between . . . larger social and

cultural realms and everyday understandings of social interaction” (Friedland & Zhong, 1996 as

cited by Scheufele, 1999). Music videos provide another medium to connect to the audience

because images do not “just enhance memory for verbal themes; they provide a contextual

framework in which semantic comprehension of the narrative takes place” (Gunter, 1987 as cited

by Abraham & Appiah, 2006, p. 188). The frame sets the stage in digital storytelling for

emphasized imagery, change of pace, as well as point of view to take place within the piece of

media.

Communication as Social Influence

Dated studies have revealed that “when exposed to a message, persons first comprehend

it and then decide either to embrace it or reject it” however, it has been discovered that

communication is more complex than such revelations (Shepherd et al., 2006, p.183). Boster

(2006) defines social influence “as change in belief, attitude, or behavior, or some combination

of these three factors, that occurs as a function of exposure to an external message or series of

external messages” (Boster as cited by Shepherd et al., 2006, p.180). Therefore, “social influence

is a result of all communication” regardless if a viewer accepts or rejects it, they still were forced

to form a belief about it (Shepherd et al., 2006, p. 183). The concept of frames as an example of

15
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

communication as social influence refers to media frames and individual frames because the

media frame in which information is presented triggers the individual frames comprehension,

thus, forcing an individual to accept or reject the presented information. Gamson (1985), for

example, conceptualized “a potential impact of the frames people use to interpret conflicts, is the

mobilization for collective action aimed at social change” (Gamson, 1985 as cited by Scheufele,

1999, p.113-114). Futhermore, Klanderman (1988, 1992), and Entman & Rojecki (1993) focused

more on how “master frames invented by social movements can influence people’s motivation to

support these movements and to form consensus” (Klanderman, 1988, 1992; Entman & Rojecki,

1993 as cited by Scheufele, 1999, p.114). Understanding the idea of communication as a social

influence is relevant to the current study because the selected music videos use elements of

communication, such as framing and digital storytelling, to influence people’s motivation for

collective action aimed at social change.

Intersectionality

Studies on intersectionality have been conducted to understand this concept that

encompasses the interconnected nature of social classifications. Cho et al. (2013) define

intersectionality as the idea that when it comes to thinking about how inequalities persist,

categories like gender, race, and class are best understood as overlapping and mutually

constitutive rather than isolated and distinct (Cho et al., 2013). Communication scholars have

instigated the conversation centered around intersectionality because it “has facilitated

intersectionality’s movement within and across disciplines, pushing against and transcending

boundaries, while building interdisciplinary bridges, and prompting a number of theoretical and

normative debates” becoming a major theme in modern media (Carbado et al., 2013, p. 304).

16
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

This concept is pertinent to the current study because intersectionality contains the theoretical

framework for grasping how facets of one’s social and political identities might combine to

produce distinctive methods of discrimination. Intersectionality consists of “the inter-locking

ways in which social structures produce and entrench power and marginalization, and by

drawing attention to the ways that existing paradigms that produce knowledge and politics often

function to normalize these dynamics.” (Carbado, 2013). Now more than ever, mass media has

shed light on these methods of discrimination, in efforts to spread awareness for the oppressed in

hopes to create change. Thus, “the practical dimensions of Critical Race Theory within which

intersectionality was situated, the goal was not simply to understand social relations of power,

nor to limit intersectionality’s gaze to the relations that were interrogated therein, but to bring the

often hidden dynamics forward in order to transform them” (Carbado, 2013).

The audience or receiver is also impacted by elements such as race, gender, class, in the

interpretation of messages. Because the goal of the current study is to examine how images and

non-verbal cues impact the reception of messages, it is equally important to discuss how

intersectionality impacts the reception of such frames but also forms individual frames for the

interpretation of messages. The intersectional character in the survey/questionnaire participants

and how their intersectional experience impacts their interpretation is significant to acknowledge

when selecting participants for the study. Carbado (2013), assists our understanding explaining

the “intersectional lens can reveal, on a given issue and between separate identity groups,

perspectives of both privilege and victimhood, and thereby create a connection around shared

experiences of discrimination, marginalization, and privilege” (Carbado, 2013). Because the

selected song happens to be from the Hip-Hop genre, intersectionality is intrinsically present in

both the message and the receiver. There is an intersectional lens in which the communicator

17
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

portrays the message, meaning hip hop demonstrates complex (intersectional) depictions of

identity. As well as an intersectional lens in which the audience accepts this message. It is

pertinent to recognize this relevance and supporting research is required to attempt to define the

Hip-Hop genre.

Hip-Hop & Intersectionality

There is relevant literature on the critical and complex messages about the reality of race,

poverty, inequality, etc., that is featured in some hip hop. Hip-hop was originally described as an

outlet and a voice for marginalized individuals from disenfranchised backgrounds and low-

income areas because hip-hop culture reflected the socioeconomic and political dynamics of their

lives. Hip-hop culture itself is diverse and complex; presenting many sub varieties of hip hop.

Some artists, labels, and lyrics are more expository in their point of view or general attitude, than

others. Some videos and lyrics might have a social message but other hip-hop videos, as well as

other genres, also reproduce gendered and raced stereotypes, therefore, all hip hop is not the

same. Despite the stereotypes that the hip-hop genre perpetuates violence and “thug” behavior-

traditional hip-hop aims to expose common social issues that more people in modern America

can relate to that not. The video I have selected is more of the critical sort because it refers to the

origin of hip-hop, with the intentions of achieving exposure of elements of intersectional

experiences. Hip-hop articulates “the death of civil rights; the militarization of urban space; the

infiltration of political movements (Black Panthers, Brown Berets, Young Lords); massive

joblessness; the digital age; declining parks, schools, and youth programs; the growth of the

prison industrial complex; epidemics of drugs, guns, and violence; and innovation, creativity,

and play” (Hoch, 2006 as cited by Akom, 2009, p. 52). All these components intersect to make

“Hip Hop’s origins multifaceted, politically conflicting, consistently debated, and highly

18
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

complicated” (Hoch, 2006 as cited by Akom, 2009, 52). With so many social issues in modern

America personified, hip-hop cannot be limited to just a genre of music, it is an entire culture.

Intersectionality can be defined as the presence of overlapping and interconnected systems of

race-class-gender-identity, some possibly dominant and others disadvantaged, thus, hip-hop can

be defined as the medium in which artists express their intersectional experiences. However, hip-

hop cannot be defined as just one entity. Characteristics of hip-hop acknowledged by Akom

(2009) include “hip hop as a vehicle to explore social justice themes such as police brutality,

Black incarceration, misogyny, homophobia, racism, sexism, white supremacy, Black

nationalism, and commodification while articulating the demands for social justice.” (Akom,

2009, p. 58). Communication scholars believe hip-hop to be a means of representation for the

disenfranchised youth declaring “hip hop is an important lens for socio-political analysis and

representation of marginalized communities, and that youth-driven research on hip hop and

popular culture is an instantiation of reading and acting upon the world, that is, critical

pedagogy” (Fischer, 2002; Freire, 1970; Stovall, 2006; Yang, 2006 as cited by Akom, 2009, p.

55). Akom (2009) identified social messages of hip-hop originated as “a liberatory practice

rooted in the long history of the Black freedom struggle and the quest for self-determination for

oppressed communities around the world” (Akom, 2009, p. 53). Hip-hop encompasses messages

that reflect social, economic, and political realities for the socially disadvantaged and those

relegated to the fringe of society.

“This Is America” by Childish Gambino

Relevant scholarship speaks to the social meaning and impact of the chosen songs and the

genre of hip-hop, that reinforce this notion of media as a social influence. As I think about

frames, digital story-telling, intersectionality, and media as social influence, it is useful to present

19
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

“This Is America" by Childish Gambino with and without the video component because the

audio invokes emotion on its own. However, the music video combined with the evocative

elements in the audio elevates the songs complexity. The lyrics predominantly address being

black in the United States and gun violence in the country as well as police brutality. Pitchfork's

Stephen Kearse described the song as a representation of the "tightrope of being black", with the

song "built on the sharp contrast between jolly, syncretic melodies and menacing trap cadences"

(Kearse, 2018). The music video identifies social messages and characteristics of hip hop

identified in our articles through graphic imagery addressing the high rate of mass shootings in

the United States, the overarching issue of gun violence in the United States, as well as the deep-

rooted racism and discrimination against African Americans.

The reception to be analyzed in the study includes that of the video component of “This

Is America” by Childish Gambino. Referring to previous research, the framing in the music

video will influence the reception from the audience. The present study plans to analyze how the

audience interprets the most apparent use of framing in this music video; that of the handgun and

automatic weapon. Within the first 53 seconds of the video, Gambino shoots a man in the back

of the head with a handgun, while emulating an unusual stance like that of a Jim Crow caricature

(Shamsian, 2018). At a later point, Childish Gambino uses an automatic weapon to gun down a

church choir. In both occurrences, a child emerges from off-screen carrying a red cloth, on which

Gambino gently lays the automatic weapon, while the bodies are passively dragged away. This

could be interpreted "as a reference to Americans' willingness to protect gun rights over people"

(Gramlich, 2019).

This music video represents complex intersectional themes related to identity; concepts

of racism and upward mobility present in the video represent intersectionality as defined by Cho

20
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

et al. (2013). The current study aims to analyze the reception of the juxtaposition of the lyrics

with the video component, enhanced by digital storytelling. If we understand digital storytelling

as enriching traditional oral-storytelling with elements such as visuals, song, and text, Gambino

not only utilizes all these elements but pushes them to the limit (Leopold, 2010). There are many

elements of digital storytelling throughout the music video that leave interpretation open to the

audience. The content is as disruptive as you can get without overwhelming the viewer (Leopold,

2010). The disruption in the video incorporates scenes of juxtaposition involving violence with

upbeat dancing by Childish Gambino among young children. Gambino's dancing is contrasted

against scenes of violence, coinciding with the upbeat melody, then abruptly interrupted by

powerful-evocative rap. When you juxtapose the lyrics with the video featuring Gambino

dancing with a group of kids amidst anarchy or handing off his weapons carefully after he’s just

shot someone, it seems like he’s targeting racism and America’s gun problem at the same time.

The music video, “This Is America” is an unavoidable piece of media used as a channel for

social influence. “This is America” is a formidable and allegoric portrait of 21st Century

America, calling out issues that have become normalized by society. Gambino’s lyrics and

performance take viewers back to the roots of hip-hop, an origin that lays “at the intersection of

the political protest movements of Black Nationalism of the early 1970s and the impoverished

ghettoes of urban America.” (Riesch, 2005, p.2). The oxymoron of a song and video will force

the audience to want to give it a second listen or a second view because it includes common

stereotypes about black culture in America. The song and video uses an ostensible self-

contradiction to illustrate a rhetorical point and to reveal a paradox because Gambino includes

realistic graphic violence in the video but is not doing so to promote such violence but instead

aims to expose the harm it causes in society. Mahita Gajanan of Time quoted music history

21
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

professor Guthrie Ramsey at the University of Pennsylvania: “You’re not supposed to feel as if

this is the standard fare opulence of the music industry. It’s about a counter-narrative and it

really leaves you with chills.” (Gajanan, 2018). Thus, influencing the participants to form a

belief about it, regardless if they accept or reject its message.

Significance/Rationale

This study serves as a platform to dive headfirst into this constantly evolving realm of the

online media landscape and deepen both practical and theoretical knowledge of how and why

digital media exists as a central component to framing and its intersectional reception. Efficient

and effective communication means standing out from the crowd, and this study will provide

insight for why certain stories and messages of significant substance resonate with audiences

across a variety of digital platforms. The concept of how images and non-verbal cues impact the

reception of messages in music videos is an area in extant research that warrants further

investigation. This thesis is of consequence because we all share in a reality molded by media.

Whether through news, entertainment, or advertising consumption, we are all influenced by the

mediated world – even if we are not fully conscious of it. In today’s digitized world we spend

more and more time “online;” we flip through Facebook, scroll through Twitter, and check

Instagram. It is important for individuals to see just how an audience can be influenced or

swayed by a message and mobilized to accomplish incredible achievements that no single person

could ever hope to alone.

Specific Purpose

I intend to explore how images and non-verbal cues impact the reception of messages.

Furthermore, I intend to discuss how intersectionality impacts the reception of frames/forms

individual frames for the interpretation of these messages.

22
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Research Questions

I am going to study if and how the elements of digital storytelling impact how well a

message is interpreted by an audience, guided by the research of various communication theories

and concepts such as framing, digital media stories, and intersectionality. The planned research

will build on and integrate the results of existing theory and publications by examining the

elements of digital storytelling that makes a message compelling to viewers.

RQ1: How do images and non-verbal cues in framing in specific hip-hop music videos

impact how a message is interpreted?

RQ2: If and how differentiated intersectional identities inform the reception of frames

with the combination of lyrics and images as compared to the lyrics alone?

23
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Chapter 3: Scope and Methodology

Scope of the Study

The general purpose of the study was to explore how images and non-verbal cues impact

the reception of messages. Furthermore, I intended to discuss how intersectionality impacts the

reception of frames/forms individual frames for the interpretation of these messages. The survey

will be distributed via email assisted by a moderator. The sample size of the study was a survey

distributed to 13 teachers, all of which are a part of the staff at Lafayette Elementary School. The

provided completion time for the study was a two-and-a-half-week period. The breadth of work

was moderate considering the amount of time allowed for the final copy.

The topics and theories discussed were that of Visual and Non-verbal Cues in Framing,

Digital Storytelling, Communication as Social Influence, Intersectionality, and Hip-Hop.

Although I have done a study incorporating the concept of the role of the media in influencing

the way people understand messages from media distributors, I limited the work to one specific

area of media, such as music videos in the entertainment industry. The purpose of this

concentration was to focus explicitly on the images and non-verbal cues in framing in specific

hip-hop music videos that impact how a message is interpreted. As well as, if and how

differentiated intersectional identities inform the reception of frames with the combination of

lyrics and images as compared to the lyrics alone. Thereby, topics and theories implicitly

excluded was research that included media’s capacity to affect the character, behavior, or belief

of an individual present in journalism and breaking news. This distinction allowed me to narrow

my research considering the amount of time and still gather data of valid substance for the

current study.

24
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Methodology

Methodological Approach

The overall approach to the research was qualitative, using the survey method. The

positivist's research method of a survey can be defined as “when you ask a large number of

people (usually called respondents) about their beliefs, opinions, characteristics, and past or

present behaviors” (Neuman, 2014, p. 317). Although surveys fall under the quantitative research

method, a qualitative approach will be beneficial for this experiment in addition because the

main objective is to confirm and test the hypothesis but also understand what experiences may

have led to the results of the study. Thus, this was a mixed method study with both quantitative

and qualitative elements. The quantitative method applied in this study, also known as

descriptive statistics, includes arithmetic categorization of results of the survey. Descriptive

statistics consists of collecting responses to the structured/likert scale questions, while also

seeking responses to open ended questions. This methodological approach allowed me to

confirm whether the images and non-verbal cues in framing in specific hip-hop music videos

impact how a message is interpreted but also to understand if and how differentiated

intersectional identities inform the reception of frames with the combination of lyrics and images

as compared to the lyrics alone. The area of research investigated was the language and

observations constructed by participants after being exposed to the audio component and video

component separately, and then drawing comparisons from the two experiences. To answer my

proposed research questions, I will need both qualitative and quantitative data.

Methods of Data Collection

To gain better insight into if and how differentiated intersectional identities inform the

reception of frames in a song’s audio and video component, a semi-structured

25
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

survey/questionnaire was conducted with 10 volunteer teachers from Lafayette Elementary

School. The participants were recruited through a Lafayette Elementary School Teacher’s

referral, consisting explicitly of teachers. Because, “group members should be homogeneous but

not include close friends or relatives” participates were all current teachers at Lafayette

Elementary School (Neuman, 2014, p. 471). Participants signed an informed consent form. The

survey was via email in March of 2020 and responses were collected over a two-and-a-half-week

period. 10 surveys were completed and took a semi-structured form to allow participants to

articulate and express opinions/ ideas comfortably.

The survey consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions and 12 open-ended questions. The

aim was to conduct the survey with 10 participants, giving them over a two-week period to

precisely complete it. The survey was divided into two sections, with separate instructions for

each section. To begin, I introduced the study only by telling the participants I am exploring how

images and non-verbal cues impact the reception of messages by participants. First, the

participants were instructed to listen to This Is America by Childish Gambino without the video

component, just the lyrics, via the link provided. After listening to the song, participants were

instructed to answer the following listed in Appendix X as they related to them. For most

answers, participants were asked to check the box(es) most applicable to them or fill in the

blanks. For other answers, participants were asked to please provide a response in the form of a

short-answer.

Next, participants were instructed to listen to This Is America once again but this time

with the video component included, via the link provided. After listening and watching the music

video, participants were instructed to answer the following questions as they related to them. For

most answers, participants were asked to check the box(es) most applicable to them or fill in the

26
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

blanks. For other answers, participants were asked to please provide a response in the form of a

short-answer. Each section of the survey consisted of different prompts, comprised of questions

focusing on the impact of either the lyrics or the images combined with the lyrics.

Data Analysis

In quantitative research, the analysis was based on numbers. Before analysis, the gathered

data was prepared and the dataset was checked for missing data and outliers. The multiple-choice

data was then analyzed using descriptive statistics on the data and drew conclusions of “self-

reported beliefs or behaviors” (Neuman, 2012, p. 317). Addressing the presence of

intersectionality, the questions regarding age, gender, and ethnicity were included to identify

social context from the questions about characteristics and statistically analyzing the

“associations among the variables to identify causal relationships” (Neuman, 2014, p. 319). A

qualitative approach of content analysis was used to analyze the answers from the open-ended

questions. In qualitative research, the analysis is based on language, images, and observations

(involving some form of textual analysis). The thematic analysis includes coding and closely

examining the data to identify broad themes and patterns (Neuman, 2014, p. 17). Notes were

transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted, based on the open-ended questions completed

in the surveys. This involved coding all the data before identifying and reviewing key themes.

The responses dictated the quantity of themes that were identified during the data analysis. Each

theme was examined to gain an understanding of participants’ perceptions and motivations.

Methodological Choices

Semi-structured surveys typically produce “quantitative data and compare participant

responses on the dependent variable” (Neuman, 2014, p. 319). Although open-ended

questionnaires fall under qualitative research, a quantitative approach proved to be an additional

27
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

benefit for this experiment because it “analyzes after all data have been collected, tests

preexisting theories and hypotheses, and uses precise and compact abstract data” (Neuman, p.

479). Surveys find out overall trends, some advantages of surveys with a qualitative approach

include a better understanding of the reasons behind those trends through thematic analysis.

Thematic analysis was the additional method of choice for the current study because this

analytical approach contributes new knowledge and understanding of the field of

communication. This method of analysis was suitable for the current study because the current

study was designed to analyze themes and patterns of interpretation by the participants (Neuman,

2014, p. 16). I acknowledged only using a quantitative approach as a possible method for the

study, however, I did not want to exclude the study from analyzing the communication and

meaning of the survey results in relation to their social context.

Ethical Considerations

Some ethical considerations of this study that need to be addressed include risks and

benefits of the study for the participants as well as the researcher. The risks associated with

participation in this survey/questionnaire were minimal and research participants were not

subjected to harm in any way whatsoever. A thorough level of confidentiality of the research

data was ensured and full consent was obtained from the participants prior to the study through

informed consent forms. The informed consent forms signed by the participants prior to the

study addressed the anonymity of the individuals participating in the research. The informed

consent forms also declared participants were asked to complete a survey/questionnaire

conducted by student Eastyn Baleto as part of a capstone project for the course COML 602.

Stating the project is under the supervision of Professor Pavel Shlossberg in the Department of

Communication & Leadership at Gonzaga University. The protection of the research

28
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

participant’s privacy was ensured because the respect for the dignity of research participants was

prioritized.

There was no financial compensation or direct benefits to participants for participation,

but their willingness to share their knowledge, time and experiences contributed to enrich the

knowledge of research methods and impact of new media in society. Some ethical considerations

for the researcher to consider were the risk of lack of data because the participants opted out of

answering questions. As stated in the informed consent form, individuals may choose not to

answer any particular question during the survey/questionnaire. If they felt any level of

discomfort, they may withdraw their participation of the survey/questionnaire at any point during

the completion period.

29
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Chapter 4: The Study

Introduction

The findings of the survey were substantial in answering the research questions of the

current study. The participants of the survey/questionnaire provided relevant data through both

the multiple-choice questions as well as the open-ended questions. A mixed-method was used to

analyze that results of the study through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. The

descriptive statistics provided direct information regarding perspectives before and after the

visual component of the study, in addition to their age, race, and gender. The thematic analysis

was designed to analyze themes and patterns of interpretation by the participants provided in the

open-ended questions. The mixed-method study allowed us to analyze the communication and

meaning of the survey results in relation to their social context as well as develop an

understanding of the reasons behind those trends through thematic analysis.

Results of the Study

Descriptive Statistics

The survey/questionnaire was sent out to 13 participants total via email. These 13

volunteer participants were teachers from Lafayette Elementary School. The participants were

recruited through a Lafayette Elementary School Teacher’s referral, allowing the study to consist

explicitly of teachers. Of the 13 participants who received the survey/questionnaire, 10

responded (77%).

Participant Age Gender Ethnicity


Participant 1 18-25 Female Caucasian
Participant 2 56-65 Male Caucasian
Participant 3 26-35 Female Caucasian

30
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Participant 4 46-55 Male Caucasian


Participant 5 26-35 Male Caucasian
Participant 6 46-55 Female Pacific Islander
Participant 7 26-35 Female Pacific Islander
Participant 8 36-45 Male Caucasian
Participant 9 46-55 Male Caucasian
Participant 10 56-65 Female Caucasian
Figure X

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the multiple-choice questions. The multiple-

choice questions from the survey that were drawn upon for the descriptive statistics portion of

the analysis include the age, gender, and ethnicity of the participant along with the multiple-

choice questions listed below along with their results. Of the 10 participants who responded to

the survey/questionnaire:

• 10% were of the 18-25-year-old age range

• 30% were of the 26-35-year-old age range

• 10% were of the 36-45-year-old age range

• 30% were of the 46-55-year-old age range

• 20% were of the 56-65-year-old age range

Of the 10 participants who responded to the survey/questionnaire:

• 50% were Female

• 50% were Male

Of the 10 participants who responded to the survey/questionnaire:

31
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

• Caucasian: 8 = 80%

• Pacific Islander: 2 = 20%

First, the participants were instructed to listen to This Is America by Childish Gambino without

the video component, just the lyrics, via the link provided. After listening to the song,

participants were asked to check the box(es) most applicable to them or fill in the blanks. Of the

10 participants who responded to the survey/questionnaire:

• Did you feel you could comprehend the lyrics of the song?

o 60% felt they could comprehend the lyrics of song with just the audio.

o 40% felt they could not comprehend the lyrics of song with just the audio.

• Could you determine the message of the song?

o 50% felt they could determine the message of the song with just the audio.

o 50% felt they could not determine the message of the song with just the audio.

• Was the message obvious to you?

o 40% felt the message was obvious to them with just the audio.

o 60% felt the message was not obvious to them with just the audio.

Next, the participants were instructed to listen to This Is America once again but this time with

the video component included, via the link provided. After listening and watching the music

video, participants were asked to check the box(es) most applicable to them or fill in the blanks.

Of the 10 participants who responded to the survey/questionnaire:

• Did any auditory elements stand out to you more after watching the video?

o 80% felt auditory elements stood out to them more after watching the video

32
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

o 20% felt no auditory elements stood out to them more after watching the video

• Did the visuals in the video impact your reception of the song’s message?

o 100% stated the visuals in the video impacted their reception of the song’s message.

Thematic Analysis

The thematic analysis includes coding and closely examining the data to identify broad

themes and patterns (Neuman, 2014, p. 17). Notes were transcribed and thematic analysis was

conducted, based on the open-ended questions completed in the surveys. This involved coding

all the data from the 10 participants before identifying and reviewing key themes. The responses

dictated the quantity of themes that were identified during the data analysis. Thus, 4 themes were

examined to gain an understanding of participants’ perceptions and motivations based on the

codes identified below:

Codes Themes
• struggled to hear the words (p4) Uncertainty
• did not understand (p4)
• do not have a clear understanding (p2)
• did not understand the song without a
visual element (p4)
• didn’t detect a specific message (p9)
• indecipherable words (p4)
• my understanding of the lyrics was
fragmentary at best and occasionally
mistaken (p2)
• when only listening, I missed the
point(p3)
• I do not have a good hear to follow
the message (p10)
• difficult for me to make sense of all
the lyrics (p10)
• visuals in the video make it much Helpful
easier (p7)

33
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

• image of him running from the police


made it obvious (p4)
• makes it clear the message is about
race, excluded from ‘age, gender,
etc.’(p3)
• visuals added to the effectiveness of
the message (p7)
• exceedingly evident in the music
video (p7)
• the visual completely changes the
song for me (p1)
• helped me comprehend the
message(p1)
• hints throughout the video (p7)
• highlighted the transition from the two
tempos of the song (p5)
• easier to identify and comprehend the Reception/comprehension
song’s message (p8)
• all had meaning (p1)
• I did not catch these lyrics without the
video, this made me comprehend the
message (p1)
• anytime a face is connected with a
voice that individuals story comes
alive (p3)
• communicated the theme (p3)
• the visual aspect confirmed what I
picked up (p10)
• more shocking and vivid (p2) Non-verbal cues
• gunshots (p5)
• choir being murdered (p1)
• blood on the wall (p1)
• portray (p6)
• brutal or graphic imagery (p4)
• contrasting imagery (p9)
• visual completely changes the song for
me (p1)
• brutality of the killing in the video
represents the gun violence (p6)
• shootings were shocking (p2)
• the way Gambino is walking/acting
(p1)
• killing that shocked the viewer at the
start of each ‘This is America’ (p4)

34
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

• contrast between violence and feeling


free (p8)
• odd facial expressions (p4)
• visual learner (p7)
• see what was happening vs only
listening to what I think was
happening (p7)
• shock the viewer (p4)
• chaos and violence behind them (p7)
• lighting, framing, color, costume
design, and stage/background design
(p7)
• I didn’t hear the gunshots until I saw
them (p2)
Figure Y

Review of Key Themes

The codes identified in Figure Y were transcribed after analyzing all open-ended

questions from the survey/questionnaire listed in Appendix X. Once these codes were

transcribed, key themes were generated from each set, based on the pattern of phrases in the

codes. These 4 key themes: uncertainty, helpful, reception/comprehension and non-verbal cues,

were identified after coding all the data from the 10 participants. These themes and the

questions/answers associated with each theme implicate connections between the descriptive

statistics and the thematic analysis by providing in depth reasoning behind the multiple-choice

responses. The theme uncertainty raises the hypothesis that the audio component was insufficient

in eliciting a confident reception of the song from the participants and the ability to determine the

statement that is being made about the subject of lyrics. The codes identified for the theme

Uncertainty, that subsequently led to such hypothesis, were drawn exclusively from the answers

of the questions in the audio only section of the survey/questionnaire listed below:

1. What auditory elements of the song stood out to you?

35
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

3. What lyrics stood out to you?

6. What is the is the subject of the lyrics? What statement is being made about that

subject of the lyrics?

7. What lyrics helped you understand this message?

The theme helpful refers to the hypothesis that visuals and non-verbal cues in framing assist the

individual in interpreting a song’s message. The codes identified for the theme Helpful,

supporting this theory, were elicited from a pattern specifically recognized in the answers of the

questions of the audio & visual section of the survey/questionnaire listed below:

6. Did the visuals in the video make it easier to comprehend the song’s message? Why or

why not?

8. Do you feel that any of the visuals added to the song’s message, if yes, why?

9. Do you feel that any of the visuals took away from the song’s message, if yes, why?

10. Could you identify any specific moments where particular images conveyed

significant meanings in the video? If yes, please list.

The theme reception/comprehension established in our thematic analysis elicited further

investigation of this theme and its association with the audio comprehension when combined

with the visual component as well as comparing the comprehension levels of the participants and

their intersectional lens based on their demographic (age, gender, ethnicity) provided. The codes

identified for the theme Reception/Comprehension, motivating further investigation, were

prompted from a pattern highlighted in the answers of the questions of the audio & visual section

of the survey/questionnaire listed below:

36
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

6. Did the visuals in the video make it easier to comprehend the song’s message? Why or

why not?

7. After both listening and watching, what would you say was the overall message of the

song?

8. Do you feel that any of the visuals added to the song’s message, if yes, why?

9. Do you feel that any of the visuals took away from the song’s message, if yes, why?

10. Could you identify any specific moments where particular images conveyed

significant meanings in the video? If yes, please list.

Lastly, the theme non-verbal cues prompt us to think about this theme in the context of

identifying the exact images and non-verbal cues in framing, that impacted the participant’s

interpretation of the song’s message and conveyed a significant meaning that would not have

been seen without the video component. The codes identified for the theme Non-verbal cues

were generated from the answers of all the open-ended questions, included the audio & visual

section of the survey/questionnaire as well as listed below:

2. What visual elements stood out to you in the video?

4. What was the common theme of the visuals in the video?

6. Did the visuals in the video make it easier to comprehend the song’s message? Why or

why not?

7. After both listening and watching, what would you say was the overall message of the

song?

8. Do you feel that any of the visuals added to the song’s message, if yes, why?

37
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

9. Do you feel that any of the visuals took away from the song’s message, if yes, why?

10. Could you identify any specific moments where particular images conveyed

significant meanings in the video? If yes, please list.

Descriptive Statistics and Thematic Analysis

The theme uncertainty in our thematic analysis motivated further exploration of the

incomprehension of lyrics noticed in comparison to the percentage of participants who felt they

could comprehend the lyrics of the song with just the audio component. Although 60% (p1, p3,

p5, p7, p8, and p10) of the participants felt they could comprehend the lyrics of the song with

just the audio component, most participants (70%) comprehended lyrics only from the chorus

“this is America” (p1, p2, p4, p5, p6, p7, and p9), which happens to also be the title of the song.

As well as the lyrics from the refrain, “Get your money, black man” (p1, p2, p3, p4, p6, p7, p8,

and p10). Other lyrics some participants (40%) noticed and understood were from beginning of

the bridge “we just wanna party/we just want the money” (p2, p3, p6, and p7) consisting of a

more upbeat and positive melody. All the lyrics the participants took note of were repeated

several times throughout the song, sung at a slow tempo, and enunciated well in comparison to

the rest of the lyrics.

Once again, the theme uncertainty in our thematic analysis motivated us to examine the

descriptive statistics regarding the percentage of participants who believed the message was

obvious to them with just the audio component. Only 40% (p3, p7, p8, and p10) of the

participants said the message was obvious to them with just the audio component which helped

us identify the relationship between the lack of understanding of the subject of the lyrics and the

ability to determine the statement that is being made about that subject of lyrics. Participants

provided a wide variety of answers from this question and 40% (p2, p4, p9, p10) of the

38
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

participants admitted they do not think they have a good enough grasp on the lyrics to provide an

answer when asked what lyrics helped them understand the message of the song when only

listening to the audio. One participant stated, “I don’t think I actually understood the song

enough to comprehend the message being delivered” (p4) when referring to the song’s lyrics.

Because of the wide variety of responses to this question one can infer the participants could not

consistently determine the subject of the lyrics after only hearing the song without the visuals. A

few speculated that the subject of the lyrics was “guns, violence, police” (p2), as well as, “life

and happiness isn’t free, especially if you are black” (p3) but were still unsure.

The theme helpful identified in our thematic analysis and the self-evident results from the

descriptive statistics, guided us towards key findings regarding visuals and non-verbal cues in

framing assisting the individual in interpreting a song’s message. 80% (p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p9,

and p10) of the participants said auditory elements stood out more after watching the video and

90% (p1, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9, and p10) of the participants said lyrics stood out more after

watching the video. The association among these results helped us identify the relationship

between the audio comprehension when combined with the visual component. Participant 1

listed the lyrics “police be trippin/guns in my area” as a lyric that stood out to them more when

paired with the visuals saying “For some reason, I did not catch these lyrics without the video.”

For other participants, more understated lyrics became more apparent in the music video,

Participant 9 acknowledged, “The line ‘we so pretty’ (or something along those lines) that was

sung while he was dancing in the midst of teenagers in their schoolgirl outfits ... that was much

more pronounced when paired with the visuals.” In addition, 100% of the participants said the

visuals in the video made it easier to comprehend the song’s message because “the visuals in the

video make it easier to identify and comprehend the song’s message” (p7). 30% (p5, p8, and p9)

39
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

of the participants stated the visuals “highlighted the transition from the two tempos of the song”

(p5) and Participant 7 specifically expressed they are a “visual learner” (p7) and the visuals

allowed them to “see what was happening vs only listening to what I think was happening” (p7).

Guided by the theme non-verbal cues from the thematic analysis, further investigation

ensued to determine which images and non-verbal cues the participants observed when exposed

to both the audio and visual components. Specific images and non-verbal cues in framing that

impacted the participant’s interpretation of the song’s message included “the way Childish

Gambino is dressed. He is wearing neutral pants, showing he could be anyone, any of us in

America” (p7) subliminally conveying a significant meaning that would not have been seen

without the video component. Another image and non-verbal cue in framing in this specific hip-

hop music video that impacted how the message was interpreted were the dances moves from

Gambino as well as characters in the background. One participant stated:

“When only listening to it, I missed the point that black culture is also exploited for pop

culture. Society wants their beauty and fashion and dances moves but doesn’t value their

lives. As a white lady, I could not empathize but I could see the damage and absurdity of

that message, and what a contradiction this message sends to our community members of

color” (p3).

This participant explicitly acknowledged the benefit of having images and non-verbal cues in

this specific hip-hop music video to enhance their understanding of the song.

Supporting the themes helpful and non-verbal cues from the thematic analysis, 0% the

participants felt any of the visuals took away from the song’s message. In fact, one participant

explicitly said all the visuals were “intentional” and “all had meaning” (p1). When asked Do you

40
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

feel that any of the visuals took away from the song’s message, if yes, why? participants took the

time at this point in the survey to explain why none of the visuals took away from the song’s

message. Participant 4 explained:

“I think that as an artist, he [Gambino] has chosen his images and aligned them in such a

way as to shock the viewer. The lighter start of the song is broken immediately when [he]

murders the man with the bag […] the ‘black man’ is being killed by America” (p4).

Participants were able to identify specific moments where particular images conveyed significant

meanings in the video. Some of the moments most mentioned by participants included “each

shooting: shooting the man playing the guitar [and] the choir being murdered […] the blood on

the wall” (p1) and “The end of the song with him running from the police and his facial

expressions” (p4). Other images of significant meaning listed by participants included, “kids,

dancing, & having fun, in the midst of” all the chaos (p10).

Based on the descriptive statistics as well as the theme reception/comprehension, there

were apparent distinctions amongst the findings from the female participants of the study in

comparison to the male participants. Our survey results revealed the females, specifically

females from the age range 35 and under, understood and digested the song with and without the

visuals better than any other demographic in the study. 70% (p1, p2, p4, p5, p6, p7, and p9) of

the participants comprehended the song with and without the visuals, and of those participants

40% (p1, p3, p6, and p7) were female. Although, these female participants could comprehend the

meaning of the song without visuals, all of them explicitly stated the visuals were beneficial and

enhanced their understanding of the song. Of those women 35 and under, consisting of only 30%

(p1, p3, and p7) of the study, 2 of them were Caucasian and 1 was Pacific Islander. Based on our

thematic analysis this is because the younger participants, such as these three female participants

41
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

are accustomed to this the speed and style of hip-hop unlike the older participants who are less

familiar to this form of hip-hop. One participant, from the 56-65 age range said:

“Yes, partly because of my age & I do not listen to a lot of the latest music […] It is

difficult for me to make sense of all of the lyrics due to speed of the words & articulation

by the artist. The visual aspect confirmed what I picked up from the audio only

presentation.” (p10).

When asked whether the visuals in the video made it easier to comprehend the song’s message,

Participant 10 openly stated her age was a factor effecting her ability to articulate the song

without the visuals.

The Caucasian males, specifically the Caucasian males in the 46-55 age range, struggled

to comprehend the song without the visuals with only 20% (p4 and p9) of the male participants,

which consisted of 50% (p2, p4, p5, p8, and p9) of the participants of the study, comprehending

the song without the visuals. Based on our thematic analysis, the audio did not provide enough

for these male participants to confidently form their own belief about the song’s message. The

participants in the 46-66 age range, consisting of 20% (p4 and p9) of the study’s participants,

found it difficult to decipher a clear message without the visuals. Thus, these participants relied

on the visuals of “the violent gun violence” (p9) and “the final image of him running from the

police” (p4) to demonstrate the dangers that come with being an African American man in

America.

Discussion

There were significant findings from the survey/questionnaire that allowed us to answer

the RQ1 of the study: How do images and non-verbal cues in framing in specific hip-hop music

videos impact how a message is interpreted? Some key findings of the study identified include

42
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

the lack of lyrics noticed when only listening to the audio component as well as the high

percentage of participants stating the message was not obvious to them when only listening to

the audio component. All the lyrics the participants took note of were repeated several times

throughout the song, sung at a slow tempo, and enunciated well in comparison to the rest of the

lyrics. These findings helped us identify the relationship between the lack of understanding of

the subject of the lyrics and the ability to determine the statement that is being made about that

subject of lyrics. The meaning and implications of these findings given the literature and theory/s

that informed our work are participants were unable to remember specific song lyrics because

they did not have a visual to attach the lyric too. According to Abraham & Appiah (2006),

without a visual corresponding to a set of words, the participant could not recall verbal messages

after listening to the audio component. Abraham & Appiah’s (2006) study of nonverbal cues

informed this portion of the study because it provides applicable research to the discussion of

message interpretation relating to framing by applying the dual code theory. This theory helps to

explain “the observations made that in dual-model presentations of information pictorial

juxtapositions with verbal messages can enhance the memory for and comprehension of verbal

information” (Burgoon, 1985; Folger & Woodall, 1982; Gunter, 1987; Stone, 1987 as cited by

Abraham & Appiah, 2006, p. 187). Thus, the participants struggled to remember lyrics after

listening to only the audio component, because they lacked a visual to associate the lyric with to

assist their memory for verbal information. Participant 1 contributed to this notion as they listed

the lyrics “police be trippin/guns in my area” as a lyric that stood out to them more when paired

with the visuals saying, “For some reason, I did not catch these lyrics without the video.”

Additionally, Abraham & Appiah’s (2006) study explains participants stated the message was

43
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

not obvious to them after only hearing the song without the visuals due to the lack of visuals with

just an audio component hindering their comprehension of verbal information.

In addition to these findings regarding comprehension, 80% (p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p9,

and p10) of the participants said auditory elements stood out more after watching the video and

90% (p1, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9, and p10) of the participants said lyrics stood out more after

watching the video. The association among these results helped us identify the relationship

between the audio comprehension when combined with the visual component. 100% of the

participants could identify specific images and nonverbal cues in framing in the music video that

contributed to their interpretation of the song and 0% of the participants felt any of the visuals

took away from the song’s message. Our method choice of a survey/questionnaire with open-

ended questions allowed the participants to expand on their observations, not just by listing the

images and nonverbal cues they identified in the music video but also how and why these visuals

drew their attention and the impact these visuals had on their interpretation. Given the literature

and theory/s that informed our work, the meaning and implications of these findings refer to

framing in videos because “images, unlike words, are indexical-they are treated as direct

pointers, as opposed to constructed representations of reality” making that statement that images

and nonverbal cues in the video directly told the viewers what the subject of the video is and

what statement is being made about that subject (D’Angelo & Kuypers, 2010, p. 217).

The discussion of digital storytelling in music videos is another concept significant to our

key findings. Specific images and non-verbal cues in framing that impacted the participant’s

interpretation of the song’s message included “the way Childish Gambino is dressed. He is

wearing neutral pants, showing he could be anyone, any of us in America” (p7) subliminally

conveying a significant meaning that would not have been seen without the video component.

44
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Participant 3 identified “the students were especially important in communicating that this is a

race thing. It transcends age, gender, etc.” expanding further stating, “young black children are

fed this message and are also fighting for their own survival and acceptance” thus providing

another example of images and non-verbal cues in framing that impacted the participant’s

interpretation of the song’s message. Oliva et al. (2017), aims to further rationalize these

elements of storytelling in the context of This is America mentioning, “storytelling in video clips

becomes more complex if we analyze some important remarks such as the music timing, the

advertising and marketing of the songs, and the artist’s image and performance” (Oliva et al.,

2017, p. 465). Therefore, the observations of the way Gambino is dressed made by Participant 7

as well as the observation of Gambino’s “odd facial expressions” made by Participant 4 impacted

the perspective in which the participants interpreted the song’s message by making the song

more complex.

Additionally, Oliva et al. (2017) mentioned above, music timing is an important remark

to analyze that makes storytelling in video clips more complex, thus, 60% (p2, p4, p5, p8, p9,

and p10) participants noticed a contrasting/transitioning tempo when listening to the audio

component and did not know how to make sense of this rhythmic distinction at the time. Oliva et

al. (2017), attempts to unpack this example of storytelling in the context of the This is America

music video declaring, video clip language in that it is typically “fast, active, based on slow or

fast rhythmic arrangements. It is necessary to pay attention to the connection between the rhythm

of the songs and the visual images” (Oliva et al., 2017, p. 465). Participant 5 stated the visuals

“highlighted the transition from the two tempos of the song” (p5) specifically expressing they are

a “visual learner” (p7) and the visuals allowed them to “see what was happening vs only

listening to what I think was happening” (p7). Therefore, the video component of the song helps

45
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

bring the story together for the audience displaying a connection between each

transition/contrasting tempo and the acts of violence exhibited in the music video. As identified

by Alexander (2011), “a simple photograph does not imply a narrative in itself. It needs to be

introduced in a time sequence, in a logic association with other sequences” (Alexander, 2011 as

cited by Oliva et al., 2017, p. 466). Participants unanimously stated none of the visuals took

away from the song’s message because Gambino had “chosen his images” and the timing of

those images to “shock the viewer” with the “lighter start” at the beginning of the video that is

“broken immediately when he murders the man with the bag” on his head (p4).

These findings of the survey/questionnaire were substantial in answering the RQ1 of the

study: How do images and non-verbal cues in framing in specific hip-hop music videos impact

how a message is interpreted? Allowing us to determine the graphic, contrasting images included

in the video, as the main factor impacting how a message is interpreted because this song almost

requires a music video to make sense of the lyrics and the juxtaposition of the song’s tempo. The

visuals were undoubtedly necessary to truly expose the underlying meaning of the song but also

the timing of those visuals, visuals that specifically correspond to the lyrics and change in

rhythm and tempo were necessary for comprehension.

There were findings of great substance from the survey/questionnaire that supported us in

answering the RQ2 of the study: If and how differentiated intersectional identities inform the

reception of frames with the combination of lyrics and images as compared to the lyrics alone?

The Caucasian males, specifically the Caucasian males in the 46-55 age range, struggled to

comprehend the song without the visuals with only 20% (p4 and p9) of the male participants,

which consisted of 50% (p2, p4, p5, p8, and p9) of the participants of the study, comprehending

the song without the visuals. These findings helped us identify the relationship between

46
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

intersectional lenses and the comprehension of a song’s message when unaccompanied by a

visual. As we know, intersectionality can be defined as the presence of overlapping and

interconnected systems of race-class-gender-identity, some possibly dominant and others

disadvantaged, thus, hip-hop can be defined as the medium in which artists express their

intersectional experiences. Characteristics of hip-hop acknowledged by Akom (2009) include

“hip hop as a vehicle to explore social justice themes such as police brutality, Black

incarceration, misogyny, homophobia, racism, sexism, white supremacy, Black nationalism, and

commodification while articulating the demands for social justice” themes also present in the

This is America song (Akom, 2009, p. 58). Given the literature and theory/s that informed our

work, it is justifiable to infer the intersectional lens of Caucasian-male participants, differ from

that of the protagonist’s in the song because issues of police brutality, racism, white supremacy,

etc. are outside of the experience of the Caucasian-male participants. Because frames assist the

communicator in engaging with their audience establishing a lens in which the audience can

interpret a perspective and articulate audio components through visuals, the participant defaulted

to their own intersectional perspective to make sense of the audio. However, the intersectional

lens of the Caucasian males, in the 46-55 age range, consists that of the privilege of being the

socially and economically dominant group in society, therefore they do not inhabit the same

experiences as marginalized groups in society making it difficult to comprehend the song without

a visual to refer to. Thus, Carbado (2013), assists us in understanding the participants that are not

part of the community in which these experiences are coming from, explaining the

“intersectional lens can reveal, on a given issue and between separate identity groups,

perspectives of both privilege and victimhood, and thereby create a connection around shared

experiences of discrimination, marginalization, and privilege” (Carbado, 2013).

47
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Furthermore, it is equally important to acknowledged the intersectional lens of the

Caucasian males in the 46-55 age range in comparison to that of the Caucasian males of the 45

and under age range. Although the Caucasian males of the 45 and under age range could

comprehend the meaning of the song without visuals, all of them openly stated the visuals were

beneficial and enhanced their understanding of the song. Participant 5 demonstrated efficient

comprehension with only the audio component describing “that America pretends it stands for

one thing, equality and fairness, but its actions and people don’t reflect that truth, especially

towards minority groups” as the statement being made about the subject of the lyrics. Later,

Participant 5 once again demonstrates an enhanced understanding stating, “the contradiction of

telling black people in America that they have the tools to succeed, while putting up barriers to

that success” is the overall message of the song after listening and watching the visual

component. This does not mean these Caucasian males of the 45 and under age range

participants have inhabited the same experiences as marginalized and disenfranchised groups

have experienced, however, in the context of this studying they have exhibited a more efficient

understanding of social relations of power. Nevertheless, this key finding compels us to address

the concept of a progressive mindset from the Caucasian males of the 45 and under age range,

that differs from the Caucasian males in the 46-55 age, as well as the contrast between the

younger and older female participants. This intersectional distinction induced further

contextualization regarding the differential responses of the younger female participants (p1, p3,

and p7) in congruence with the younger male participants (p5 and p8), informed by the

theoretical lens included in the literature and theory/s used. The younger participants exhibited

efficient comprehension of social inequalities and power dynamics due to the presence of

progressive social change experienced in their upbringing as the key distinction amongst both the

48
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

male and female participants of the younger generation. Hence, displaying the effect of, “the

practical dimensions of Critical Race Theory within which intersectionality was situated, the goal

was not simply to understand social relations of power, nor to limit intersectionality’s gaze to the

relations that were interrogated therein, but to bring the often hidden dynamics forward in order

to transform them” (Carbado, 2013).

Contrary to the results from the male participants, the survey/questionnaire revealed the

females, specifically females from the age range 35 and under, understood and digested the song

with and without the visuals better than any other demographic in the study. Of those women 35

and under, consisting of only 30% (p1, p3, and p7) of the study, 2 of them were Caucasian and 1

was Pacific Islander. Our method choice provided us the opportunity to identify patterns

amongst age-gender-ethnicity in relation to how differentiated intersectional identities inform the

reception of frames. Although the two female participants identify as Caucasian, they maintain

an intersectional lens as a female in American society. The concept of how intersectionality

impacts the reception of such frames but also forms individual frames for the interpretation of

messages is present with this demographic. Even though the oppression and economic

inequalities women have and continue to suffer from today, is not the same as the mistreatment

and oppression African Americans face every day, they can still empathize on some level

because of their intersectional identity. Further perpetuating Cho et al.’s (2013) definition of

intersectionality as the idea that when it comes to thinking about how inequalities persist,

categories like gender, race, and class are best understood as overlapping and mutually

constitutive rather than isolated and distinct (Cho et al., 2013). Demonstrating the overlapping

nature of intersectionality, the female participant that identifies as Pacific Islander maintained a

differentiated intersectional identity that informed their reception of frames being both a woman

49
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

and a minority, when analyzing a song that criticizes society’s mistreatment of people of color.

Participant 7 demonstrated understanding through her intersectional lens with only the audio

declaring:

“I believe the common theme of these lyrics is discontent. (Anger and hurt are also found

throughout!). I would say the message of this song is conveyed through Childish

Gambino’s expression of how America has allowed the black man to be at the bottom of

the totem pole. It seems as if Childish Gambino is using this as a statement about the war

on guns and how a black man is viewed in America.” (p7).

Once more, Participant 7 exhibits enhanced comprehension due to her intersectional lens and

assisted by the visuals by pointing out:

“…the young people were joyously dancing with Childish Gambino with the chaos and

violence behind them. This is symbolizing the idea that we aren’t focused on ALL

NEGATIVE things, but rather we put them behind us or try to hide it. Lastly, when

Childish Gambino is running away, I felt a sense of running for his life. This symbolizes

what black people in America deal with on the daily” (p7).

These findings of the survey/questionnaire were substantial in answering the RQ2 of the

study: If and how differentiated intersectional identities inform the reception of frames with the

combination of lyrics and images as compared to the lyrics alone? Allowing us to determine

differentiated intersectional identities do in fact inform the reception of frames with the

combination of lyrics and images as compared to the lyrics alone because the visuals in the hip-

hop music video filled the gap of understanding regardless of the participants age, gender, or

ethnicity. For the sake of the study, it is important to recognize the combination of lyrics and

50
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

images were especially important in the receiver process for the individuals lacking an

intersectional identity relating to the issues addressed in the This is America music video.

51
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Chapter 5: Summaries and Conclusions

Limitations of the Study

Some limitations of my approach to consider was the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020

which as a result affected the method of the study and the number of participants available to

participate. Originally the study was to be conducted through focus-groups and semi-structured

interviews consisting of at least 20 people over the course of a two-week period. Because

Washington’s stay-at-home order due to the current pandemic required social distancing and

prohibited mass gatherings and close contact with individuals outside your household in indoor

and outdoor spaces, some changes to the method of the study were made. Thus, a semi-structured

survey/questionnaire was conducted with 10 volunteer teachers from Lafayette Elementary

School via email in March of 2020 and responses were collected over a two-and-a-half-week

period. Due to lack of volunteers during the pandemic as well as technological limitations, only

13 teachers volunteered to participate.

Recommendations for Further Study

Future students might be informed by the work completed in this study as a reference to

further investigation of visuals and non-verbal cues in other pieces of media. Topics and theories

implicitly excluded from this research included media’s capacity to affect the character, behavior,

or belief of an individual present in journalism and breaking news. Perhaps future students can

utilize this work to generate further investigation of visuals and non-verbal cues in journalism

and breaking news. Additionally, future students might be informed by the work completed in

this study by focusing on how a specific demographics intersectional identity informs the

reception of frames in a different shape of media than music videos, such as female versus male.

52
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Conclusions

For the current study the initial question motivating further exploration was: In what

ways do visuals in music videos impact how well a song’s message is interpreted? Guided by

theories and course materials this inquiry was expanded into two research questions:

RQ1: How do images and non-verbal cues in framing in specific hip-hop music videos

impact how a message is interpreted?

RQ2: If and how differentiated intersectional identities inform the reception of frames

with the combination of lyrics and images as compared to the lyrics alone?

The theories and works of literature that informed these research questions were that of Visual

and Non-verbal Cues in Framing, Digital Storytelling, Communication as Social Influence, and

Intersectionality. Abraham & Appiah’s (2006) study of nonverbal cues provided applicable

research to the discussion of message interpretation relating to framing by applying the dual code

theory, a theory that helps to explain “the observations made that in dual-modal presentations of

information pictorial juxtapositions with verbal messages can enhance the memory for and

comprehension of verbal information” (Burgoon, 1985; Folger & Woodall, 1982; Gunter, 1987;

Stone, 1987 as cited by Abraham & Appiah, 2006, p. 187). Framing in the context of digital

storytelling is relevant to our study because the frame guides the audience from the larger

narrative into one or more supporting narratives within one piece of media. Frames in digital

storytelling assist the communicator in engaging with their audience establishing a lens in which

the audience can interpret a perspective and articulate visual and audio components. The concept

of frames as an example of communication as social influence refers to media frames and

individual frames because the media frame in which information is presented triggers the

53
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

individual frames comprehension, thus, forcing an individual to accept or reject the presented

information. Gamson (1985), for example, conceptualized “a potential impact of the frames

people use to interpret conflicts, is the mobilization for collective action aimed at social change”

(Gamson, 1985 as cited by Scheufele, 1999, p.113-114). Intersectionality is a concept pertinent

to the current study because it contains the theoretical framework for grasping how facets of

one’s social and political identities might combine to produce distinctive methods of

discrimination. Intersectionality consists of “the inter-locking ways in which social structures

produce and entrench power and marginalization, and by drawing attention to the ways that

existing paradigms that produce knowledge and politics, often function to normalize these

dynamics.” (Carbado, 2013). The audience or receiver is also impacted by elements such as race,

gender, class, in the interpretation of messages. Because the goal of the current study was to

examine how images and non-verbal cues impact the reception of messages, it was significant to

observe how intersectionality impacts the reception of such frames but also forms individual

frames for the interpretation of messages.

The hip-hop music video analyzed in the current study was This is America by Childish

Gambino. Referring to previous research, we made the statement that the framing in the music

video will influence the reception from the audience. The present study analyzed how the

audience interpreted the most apparent use of framing in this music video; that of the handgun

and automatic weapon.

The implications of our findings allowed us to conclude images and non-verbal cues in

framing do impact how a message is interpreted. The findings of the survey-questionnaire were

substantial in answering the RQ1 of the study because they revealed the graphic and contrasting

images, and the framing of such images included in the video, as the main factors impacting how

54
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

a message is interpreted. The visuals are undoubtedly necessary to truly expose the underlying

meaning of the song but it is also the timing of those visuals that matters because those visuals

that specifically correspond to the lyrics and change in rhythm and tempo, were necessary for

comprehension as well. The meanings of these findings demonstrate the importance of

understanding the benefit of visuals and non-verbal cues in framing as an avenue in which

communication as a social influence may be enhanced and reach a wider, diverse audience.

Given the literature that informed this study as well as the data from the current study, images

and non-verbal cues in framing bolster a communicators statement because when accompanied

by visuals their message cannot be twisted into something that was not their intention. With the

combination of audio and visuals receivers cannot make broad statements or comparisons about

the piece of media because they are being told and showed what to think about a subject matter.

Framing in videos contribute to this notion because “images, unlike words, are indexical-they are

treated as direct pointers, as opposed to constructed representations of reality” (D’Angelo &

Kuypers, 2010, p. 217). Furthermore, “visual images do not allow a communicator to make

explicit claims, such as casual statements or comparisons.” (D’Angelo & Kuypers, 2010, p. 235).

Additionally, our findings improved our understanding of the presence of intersectional

identities and how they inform the reception of frames with the combination of lyrics and images

as compared to the lyrics alone. These findings allowed us to determine differentiated

intersectional identities do in fact inform the reception of frames with the combination of lyrics

and images as compared to the lyrics alone because the visuals in the hip-hop music video filled

the gap of understanding regardless of the participants age, gender, or ethnicity. The findings of

this study are proof that intersectional lenses effect comprehension because the participants with

similar intersectional experiences as the protagonist’s, comprehended information more

55
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

efficiently in comparison to the participants from a more economically/socially dominant group

of society. In addition to the meanings of these findings validate the concept of a progressive

mindset as beneficial in the process of comprehension because it opens receivers’ minds to

different intersectional experiences they may not have inhabited or are considered outside their

experience.

Therefore, the concept of communication as social influence is pertinent in this study

because now more individuals can share their intersectional experience, thus enlightening society

of social issues they have experienced as a member of the marginalized and disenfranchised

group of society. The combination of lyrics and images were especially important in the receiver

process for the individuals lacking an intersectional identity relating to the issues addressed in

the This is America music video. Elements of digital storytelling, such as visuals and non-verbal

cues in framing, help translate an individual’s message to receivers, regardless if they have

experienced something similar or not. Boster (2006) defines social influence “as change in

belief, attitude, or behavior, or some combination of these three factors, that occurs as a function

of exposure to an external message or series of external messages” (Boster as cited by Shepherd

et al., 2006, p.180). This music video is a form of communication as social influence because

many participants’ interpretation of the song’s message changed after being exposed to the piece

of media (the music video) corresponding to the song. The combination of the audio and visual

components for the song allowed the communicator to not only tell but show their audience their

intersectional experience, in which more privileged members of society could not have even

imagined.

56
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

References

Abraham, L., & Appiah, O. (2006). Framing News Stories: The Role of Visual Imagery in

Priming Racial Stereotypes. Howard Journal of Communications, 17(3), 183–203. doi:

10.1080/10646170600829584

Akom, A. A. (2009). Critical Hip Hop Pedagogy as a Form of Liberatory Praxis. Equity &

Excellence in Education, 42(1), 52–66. doi: 10.1080/10665680802612519

Brown, M. E., & Trevino L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions.

Leadership Quarterly 17, 595-616.

Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality. Du

Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 303–312. doi:

10.1017/s1742058x13000349

Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies:

Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–

810. doi: 10.1086/669608

D’Angelo, P., & Kuypers, J. (2010). Doing news framing analysis: empirical and theoretical

perspectives. Routledge.

Gajanan, M. (2018, May 7). Childish Gambino's 'This Is America': Breaking Down Symbols.

Retrieved from http://time.com/5267890/childish-gambino-this-is-america-meaning/

Gramlich, J., & Schaeffer, K. (2019, October 22). 7 facts about guns in the U.S. Retrieved from

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/10/22/facts-about-guns-in-united-states/

Griffin, E., Ledbetter, A., & Sparks, G. G. (2015). A first look at communication theory. New

York: Mc Graw-Hill.

57
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Kearse, S. (2018, May 7). Listen to "This Is America" by Childish Gambino. Retrieved from

https://pitchfork.com/reviews/tracks/childish-gambino-this-is-america/

Leopold, L. (2010). Digital Media Stories for Persuasion. Communication Teacher, 24(4), 187–

191. doi: 10.1080/17404622.2010.513000

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th

ed.). Pearson Educated Limited.

Oliva, R., Bidarra, J., & Araújo, D. (2017). Video and storytelling in a digital world: interactions

and narratives in videoclips. Comunicação e Sociedade, 32, 459–476. doi:

10.17231/comsoc.32(2017).2772

Riesch, R J., "Hip Hop Culture: History and Trajectory" (2005). Research Papers. Paper 32.

http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/32

Robin, B. (2013). What is Digital Storytelling? Retrieved January 19, 2020, from

https://digitalstorytelling.coe.uh.edu/page.cfm?id=27&cid=27&sublinkid=29

Scheufele, D. (1999), Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49: 103–

122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x

Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2014). The State of Framing Research. Oxford Handbooks

Online. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.47

Shepherd, G. J., John, J. S., & Striphas, T. G. (2006). Communication as ...: perspectives on

theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Shamsian, J. (2018, October 24). 24 things you may have missed in Childish Gambino's 'This is

America' music video. Retrieved from https://www.insider.com/this-is-america-music-

video-meaning-references-childish-gambino-donald-glover-2018-5#the-pose-resembles-

jim-crow-2

58
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Smith, J. (2014, June 9). 10 Nonverbal Cues That Convey Confidence At Work. Retrieved

February 7, 2020, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2013/03/11/10-

nonverbal-cues-that-convey-confidence-at-work/

Staff, B. (2019, December 30). The 100 Best Songs of 2019: Staff List. Retrieved from

https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/list/8545893/best-songs-of-2019-top-100

59
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

Appendix A

Survey
Purpose of study:
I am exploring how images and non-verbal cues impact the reception of messages by
participants.

Instructions:
Listen to This Is America by Childish Gambino without the video component, just the lyrics, via
the link provided. After listening to the song, answer the following questions as they relate to
you. For most answers, check the box(es) most applicable to you or fill in the blanks. For other
answers, please provide a response in the form of a short-answer.
Link: https://youtu.be/ddJqNY__9U8

About you:
1. Your age
(Select only one)
18-25
26-35
36-45
46-55
56-65
66-75
76 or more
2. Your gender
(Select only one)
Female
Male
Other
3. I identify my ethnicity as:
(Select all that apply)
Asian
Black/African American
Caucasian
Hispanic/Latino
Native American
Pacific Islander
Prefer not to answer

Audio Component Only Questions:


1. What auditory elements of the song stood out to you?

60
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

2. Did you feel you could comprehend the lyrics of the song?
Yes
No

3. What lyrics stood out to you?

4. Could you determine the message of the song?


Yes
No

5. Was the message obvious to you?


Yes
No

6. What is the is the subject of the lyrics? What statement is being made about that
subject of the lyrics?

7. What lyrics helped you understand this message?

Instructions continued:
Listen to This Is America once again but this time with the video component included, via the
link provided below. After listening and watching to the music video, answer the following
questions as they relate to you. For most answers, check the box(es) most applicable to you or
fill in the blanks. For other answers, please provide a response in the form of a short-answer.
Link: https://youtu.be/VYOjWnS4cMY

Audio & Visual Component Questions:


1. Did any auditory elements stand out to you more after watching the video?
Yes
No

2. What visual elements stood out to you in the video?

3. Did any lyrics stand out to you more after watching the video?
Yes
No

4. What was the common theme of the visuals in the video?

61
Intersectional Frames and Digital Storytelling

5. Did the visuals in the video impact your reception of the song’s message?
Yes
No

6. Did the visuals in the video make it easier to comprehend the song’s message? Why or
why not?

7. After both listening and watching, what would you say was the overall message of the
song?

8. Do you feel that any of the visuals added to the song’s message, if yes, why?

9. Do you feel that any of the visuals took away from the song’s message, if yes, why?

10. Could you identify any specific moments where particular images conveyed significant
meanings in the video? If yes, please list.

62

You might also like