Republic of the Philippines
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Commonwealth Avenue, Queson City, Philippines
CIRCULAR No.
Date
TO All Heads of Departments, Bureaus, Offices, Agencies and
Instrumentalities of the National Government, Heads of the
Local Government Units, Managing Heads of Government
Owned and/or Controlled Corporations, including _ its
subsidiaries, State Universities and Colleges, COA Assistant
Commissioners, COA Directors, COA Auditors, and All Others
Concemed
SUBJECT : Establishing the Criteria to Determine the Actionability of
Complaints, Information of Fraud, Requests for Audit and
Other Cases Alleging Fraudulent or Anomalous Govemment
Transactions, and the Manner of Filing Thereof Before the
Commission on Audit
RATIONALE
1.1. Section 2{2}, Article [X-D of the 1987 Philippine Constitution vests in the
Commission on Audit (COA) the exclusive authority to, among others and
subject to limitations, promulgate accounting and auditing rules and
regulations, including those for the prevention and disallowance of
irregular, unnecessary, excessive, extravagant, or unconscionable
expenditures, or uses of government funds and properties.
1.2. In line with this mandate and in furtherance of good governance and for
the promotion of transparency and accountability in all government
transactions, COA has encouraged the public to report fraudulent or
anomalous government transactions through the COA Citizens Desk or by
filing complaints and/or requests for fraud audit.
1.3 COA has received and is continually receiving an increasing number of
complaints, requests for fraud audit, or information of fraud, some of
which have been or may be found to contain unverifiable allegations,
involve insignificant amounts, non-auditable issues, or those beyond the
jurisdiction of the COA.1.4. This Circular establishes the criteria or conditions that will be used to
determine the actionability ofall information/ complaints/requests or other
cases received by this Commission.
2. SCOPE
This Circular establishes the criteria in determining the actionability of
information of fraud, requests for fraud audit, and complaints alleging fraud or
anomaly in the use of public funds or property obtained by or filed before the
COA, including cases referred by the Office of the Ombudsman (OMB) and
other government agencies, and the manner of filing thereof by the public.
3. FILING OF COMPLAINTS OR REQUESTS FOR FRAUD AUDITS
3.1 Any person who has knowledge that the transactions of, or the
projects/programs/activities implemented by any government agency is
tainted with fraud or anomaly, or that public officials or employees have
committed or are committing fraud or anomaly in transactions involving
disbursement or receipt/collection of public funds or use of government
properties and other government transactions, may file a written
information, complaint or request for fraud audit before the Fraud Audit
Office (FAO) at the COA Central Office for agencies located in the
National Capital Region (NCR) or the Office of the COA Regional
Directors for agencies located in the regions, either personally or through
mail. They may also send the same to the COA Citizens Desk Reporting
System at
3.2. Any govemment agency, including the Office of the Ombudsman, before
whom the complaints or cases were originally filed, shall refer the same to
the FAO for government agencies in the NCR or COA Regional Offices
for government agencies in the regions.
3.3. Fraud refers to an act of deceit, trickery, concealment or breach of
confidence used to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage; an unlawful
interaction between two entities where one party intentionally deceives the
other through means of false representation in order to gain illicit and
unjust advantage.' It refers to all kinds of deception - whether through
insidious machination, manipulation, concealment or misrepresentation -
that would lead an ordinarily prudent person into error afier taking the
circumstances into account.*
! XVI Intemational Congress of Supreme Audit Institutions INCOSAT
? Tankeh vs. Development Bank of the Philippines, et al., G.R. No. 171428, November 11, 2013 citing
Solidbank Corporation v. Mindanao Ferroalloy Corporation, ef a., 302 Phil. 651, 669 [2005]
nC
Page 2 of 43.4 Complaint, information of fraud, request for fraud audit or those
referred by other government agencies, which are herein collectively
referred to as cases, refer to written statements of any person who has
knowledge that the transactions of, or the projects/programs/activities
implemented by any government agency is tainted with fraud or anomaly,
or that public officials or employees have committed or are committing
fraud or anomaly in transactions involving disbursement or
receipU/collection of public funds or use of government properties and
other government transactions.
4, REQUISITES FOR ACTIONABLE CASES.
4.1 Cases are actionable provided that the following requisites are complied:
a, They must be in writing, whether on paper or in electronic form;
b. They must allege fraudulent or anomalous disbursement or
receipt/collection of publie funds and/or use of government property;
c. The transaction/s or account/s involved must be described with
sufficient particularity, such as but not limited to: the name of the
projects/programs/activities; amount involved; location in case of
infrastructure projects; year the transaction transpired or project was
implemented; name of the person/s involved, if known; the
government agency involved; or such other verifiable
information/details as shown from documents which must be attached,
ifavailable; and
4. They must not merely solicit 2 general audit of all transactions of the
agency complained of.
Cases found actionable based on these requisites shall be further
verified/evaluated by concemed COA officials or employees.
4.2 The Commission shall refer to appropriate govemment agencies
allegations of violation of laws, rules and regulations, or acvs complained
of that are not within its jurisdiction, such as land disputes involving
ownership/boundaries, personnel actions, administrative complaints
against agency personnel, tifestyle checks, and the likes.
4.3 Cases shall be dismissed if:
a. They involve transactions that have been the subject of a duly
issued/released investigation report, or of an ongoing audit
investigation of the FAO and Fraud Audit Services of the COA
Regional Offices.
.
Page 3 of 4b. The transaction/issue has been verified to have already been
investigated by the OMB or other competent authority and a Notice of
Disallowance/Charge/Suspension was already issued by the Audit
Team.
c. The transactions have transpired more than 10 years ago at the time of
filing the case.
4.4 Documents or any form of evidence pertinent to the transactions or
projects/programs/activities complained of may be provided by the
complainant/requester in support of the allegations.
4.5 The Commission Proper may direct the conduct of fraud audit of a
transaction or projects/programs/activities, in the exercise of its discretion,
5. GUIDELINES IN TAKING ACTION ON CASES
‘The guidelines prescribing the rules of procedure shall be issued to
implement this Circular.
6. REPEALING CLAUSE
Any provision of COA issuances inconsistent with any provisions of this
Circular are hereby modified, amended or repealed accordingly.
7. EFFECTIVITY
This Circular shall take effect 15 days after its publication in a newspaper
of general circulation.
ens
PARTICIPATE
JOSE A. FABIA ROLAND C. PONDOC
Commissioner Commissioner
‘AGUINALDO
airperson,
SSs/FA0,
ABSIBRS
Page 4 of 4