Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Free-Energy Change
Gibbs free energy “∆G”
More –ve energy, more tendency for the
reaction to go
Mg + H2O (l) + ½O2 → Mg(OH)2 (s) ∆Go = -142,600 cal
On the other hand
Cu + H2O (l) + ½O2 → Cu(OH)2 (s) ∆Go = -28,600 cal
For the reaction
Au + 3/2H2O (l) + 3/2O2 → Au(OH)3 (s) ∆Go = +15,700 cal
Free energy is positive; no tendency for reaction
3
• ∆G = - nFE
• Greater the E, greater is the
tendency for reaction.
• Tendency to corrode is not a
measure of reaction rate
4
The EMF and Galvanic Series
8
Reference Half-Cells
1. Calomel Half-Cell
9
10
2. Silver-Silver Chloride Half-Cell
When the electrode is immersed in chloride solution
AgCl + e → Ag + Cl- o = 0.222 V
11
12
3. Saturated Copper-Copper Sulfate Half-Cell
13
14
15
16
17
Measuring the Corrosion Potential
• The potential of a corroding metal, often termed Ecorr, is
probably the single most useful variable measured in
corrosion studies or for corrosion monitoring.
• It is readily measured by determining the voltage
difference between a metal in its environment and
an appropriate reference electrode using a high
impedance voltmeter.
• The reference electrode is contained in a Luggin
capillary to prevent any contamination of the reference
electrode by the environment or the opposite, that is,
leaking some corrosive agent in the environment
being monitored, while making potential measurements
very close to the surface of the metal being monitored.
18
19
• In measuring and reporting corrosion potentials, it is
necessary to indicate the magnitude of the voltage and its
sign. In the example shown in Fig. 4.7, the corrosion
potential of metal M is −0.405 V.
• The minus sign indicates that the metal is negative with
respect to the reference electrode. However, if the metal was
connected to the low point (Lo) and the reference
electrode to the high point (Hi) the reading would be
+0.405 V.
• It is customary to connect the reference electrode to the
low point or the instrumental ground to avoid any confusion
in reporting. Nonetheless, some manufacturers of
electrochemical equipment have done the opposite.
20
Potential-pH Diagram
• The stability of a metal when exposed to a given
environment depends on a multitude of factors that may
vary greatly with the pH and oxidizing or reducing power
of that environment.
• One useful concept to represent the effects of aqueous
environments on metals became known as potential-pH
(E-pH) diagrams, also called predominance or Pourbaix
diagrams, which have been adopted universally since
their introduction in late 1940s.
• Some interesting uses of such diagrams are:
1. predict whether or not corrosion can occur;
2. estimate the composition of the corrosion products formed; and
3. predict environmental changes which will prevent or reduce corrosion
attack.
21
22
• The chemical behavior of water across all
possible values of potential and pH as shown in
Fig. 4.10 is divided into three regions.
– In the upper region, water can be oxidized to produce
oxygen while in the lower region it can be
reduced to form hydrogen gas.
• Water is therefore only thermodynamically
stable between lines (a) and (b).
• It is common practice to superimpose
these two lines (a) and (b) on all E-pH
diagrams to mark the water stability
boundaries.
23
• A metal is deemed to be in corroding condition
when the concentration of its ions in the solution
≥ 10-6 M.
• If the concentration of ions is less than this
value, the metal is in a condition of immunity.
24
2. Passive region: In such region a metal tends to
become coated with an oxide or hydroxide that may
form on the metal either as a compact and
adherent film practically preventing all direct
contact between the metal itself and the
environment, or as a porous deposit which only
partially prevents contact between the metal and the
environment.
3. Corrosion region: Thermodynamic calculations
indicate that, in such region of an E-pH diagram, a
metal is stable as an ionic (soluble) product and
therefore susceptible to corrosion attack. Experience
is required to find out the extent and form of the
corrosion attack that may occur in the corrosion
region(s) of a Pourbaix diagram.
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33