You are on page 1of 15

REPORT No.

138 s May 1970


(S2/141)

NEDERLANDS SCHEEPSSTUDIECENTRUM TNO


NETHERLANDS SHIP RESEARCH CENTRE TNO
SHIPBUILDING DEPARTMENT LEEGHWATERSTRAAT 5, DELFT

THE MANOEUVRABILITY OF SHIPS AT LOW SPEED


(DE MAÑOEUVREERBAARHEÏD VAN SCHEPEN BU LAGE SNELHEID)

by

Ia.J. P. HOOFT
Netherlands Ship Model Basin

and

IR. M. W. C. OOSTERVELD
Netherlands Ship Model Basin

Issued by the Council


© Netherlands Ship Research Centre TNO, 1970
VOORWOORD PREFACE

Het bestúreñ van zeer grote tankers in havens en riviermonden Operating very large tankers in harbours and river estuaries is a
baart vele zorgen Immers bu toenernende grootte van het schip matter of great concern For with increasmg size of the ship on
neemt enerzijds de laagste sneiheid toe waarmee grote tankers nog the one hand the minimum speed at which large tankers still can
op koers gehouden kunnen worden anderzijds kan alleen sleep- be kept on course increases on the other hand tugboat assistance
boothuip geboden worden bu verminderde scheepssnelheid can only be given at decreased speed of the ship
0m het schip toch bu zeer lage sneiheid te kunnen besturen is In order to handle the ship at very low speed it is common
het gebruikehjk orn voor korte tijd het aantal schroefomwente practice to increase the number of propeller revolutions for a short
lingen te verhogen waardoor de effectiviteit van het roer groter period thus enlarging the rudder effectiveness It is a pity that
wordt. Helaas neemt tengevolge van deze manoeuvre de scheeps- the speed of the ship will increase also as result of this manoeuvre
sneiheid ook toe. The purpose of the investigatiOn presented in this report has
Het dod van het in dit rapport weergegeven onderzoek is ge been to determine the benefit obtained from increasing the pro
weest de winst in manoeuvreerbaarheid te bepalen die verkregen peller rpm for a certain rudder deflection Therefore model tests
wordt door bu een zekere roeruitsiag ook het schroeftoerental were carned out in the Shallow Water Basm of the N S M B to
te verbogen. Daärtoe wetden modeiproeven uitgevoerd in de determine the longitudinal and lateral forces and the yawing
ondiepwatertank van het N.S.F. teneinde de krachten in langs- en moment acting on the model at different speeds, propeller rpm's
dwarsrichting en het giermoment ùitgeoefend op het model te and rudder deflectiôns. At the same time propeller thrust and
bepalen voor verschillende scheepssnelheden, schroeftoerentallen torque were measi.irèd.
en roeruitsiagen. Tevens werden stuwkracht en askoppel ge- With the information thus Obtained from the tests it was pos-
meteñ. sible to construct a diagram from which the force generated by
Met dealdus verkregen rneetgegevens was het mogelijk een dia- the rudder at a certain speed rudder deflection and propeller
grarn te ontwikkelen, waaruit men kän afleideri hoe groot de rpm can be derived in order to compensate the disturbing forces
kiacht is, die het rer opwekt bij een bepaalde scheepssnelheid, dueto wiñd, current, waves and so on.
roerhoek en toerental orn verstorende krachten ten gevolge van Finally some turning inanoeúvres of the ship at low speed have
wmd stroom golven etc te cornpenseren ben calculated. The results of these calculations show the in-
Tenslotte zijn enige draáimanoeuvres van het schip bij lage fluence of the increased propeller rpni on the turnability and
sneiheden berekend. De úitkomsten van deze berekeningen läten speed of the ship.
de invloed z.ien, die een toename van het schroeftoerental heeft
op de wendbaarheid en de snelheid van het schip.
HET NEDERLANDS SCHEEPSSTUD1ECENTRUM TNO THE NETHERLANDS SHIP RESEARCH CENTRE TNO
CONTENTS

page
LiÑt Of symbols 6

Summary 7

1 töciiicion 7

2 Hull form and propeller characteristics of tanker model 7

3 Teslarrkdout 8

4 Discusulon of test results 9


5 Manoeu'iiing at low speeds .. 10

6 COnclUsions 11

Réfèrencès il
Appendi 12
LIST OF SYMBOLS

f(t), g(t) Functions dependent on mass, momént of inertia and


hydrodynarnic characteristics of the ship
¡ Characteristic length
v(t) Duft velocity of ship
C Rudder coefficient, C = Y/sin(5 ö0)
N Yawing rnomeñt
T Propeller thrtust
T0 Ptopeller thrust for self-propulsion of ship
V Ship speed
X Longitudinal fOrce.
Y Lateral force
Rudder angle
ô0 Rudder angle for zro ruddet force
i(t) Heading of ship
7

THE MANOEUVRABILITY OF SHIPS AT LOW SPEED


by
IR. J. P. HOOFT
and
I. M. W. C. OOSTERVELD

Summary
This report deäh with the manoeuvrbility of a 65,000 dwt tanker at low speed. The influence of an increase of the propeller rpth on
the forces and moments actmg on the ship at different rudder angles has been determined From these tests it was concluded that
the ship can be handled very well at low speeds by increasing the propeller rpm.
Fmally the result of an analysis of the manoeuvrabihty of the ship at low speed and with increased propeller rpm is given

i Introduction the rudder effectiveness and. the acceleration of the


tanker at low speed due to an increase of the propeller
The minimum speed at which large tankers can be kept
on course increases with increasing size of the ship.
Besides, with increasing tize of the ship, useful tugboat
assistance can only be given at decreased speed of the 2 Hull form aiid propeller characteristics of tanker
ship From these considerations it is evident that the model
handling of very large tankers in confined areas (har-
bours, river estuaries) becomes a matter of great The tests have been carried out with a 65,000 dwt.
tanker model equipped with a conventional screw
cOncern.
propeller.
To the experience of several pilots, however, large.
The principal dimensions of the ship are summarized
tankers can still be hand-led at very low speeds without
in table I, the hull form and the stern arrangement are
tugboat assistance (see [1]). To handle the ship at very
given iñ figure 1.
low speed, it is common practice to enlarge the rudder
effectiveness by increasing the number of revolutions of
the screw propeller or by short brsts of increased TabiC, I. Principal' dimensions of tanker

propeller revolutions. However, the speed of the ship Length between perpendicular L 248.27 m
will increase also during this manoeuvre which is an Length on water une LWL 253.62 m
Breadth moulded B 32.97 m
inconvenient circumstance. Draft rhoulded T 13.15 m
This' report deals with investigations performed at DiSplacement moulded ¿1 86,296 m3
the Netherlands Ship Model Basin, concerning the CCntre Of buô'añëy' frôni FP 119.10 m
handling of a tanker at low speed. The purpose of this Rudder area A 47.00 m2
LIB 7.53
investigation was to determine the benefit of coupling BIT 2.51
the propeller rpm to a rudder deflection. Model tests 0.8017
have been carried out to establish both the increase of A/LT 1.44%

O APP 20 FPP
Fig. 1. Body plan and stern arrangement of tanker.
Pitch distribution
in percent
175.1.6.

Fig. 2. Particulars of propeller.

The propeller design for the ship was based on 24,600 During the tests, the model was restrained on a
metric DHP at 90 rpm and a ship speed of 16.5 knots. straight. course at zero drift angle. The model was at-
The screw was designed according to the circulation tached to the towing carriage by means of a longitu-
theory for wake-adapted propellers. dinal and two lateral arms as shown in fig. 3.
'the principal full-scale characteristics of the pro-
peller are given in table II; further details of the screw FFA

propeller are presented in figure 2.

Table II. Propeller characteristics


APP. F PP

Diameter. 8.146m
Pitch at blade root 4.939 m
Pitch at blade tip 6.146m
Pitch at 075R 5.979m
Pitch ratio P/D 0.734
Blade area ratio A E/Ao 0.624
Number of blades 4

Fig. 3. Set up of models tests.


3 TestS carried out FAL and FFL = Strain gauges for mesaurement of the
lateral forces.
Resistance and self-propulsion tests Were carried out FFA = Strain, gauge for measurement of the
with the tanker model in the Deep Water Basin of the axial force.
N.S.M.B All mdel data were extrapolated to full- CG = Centre of gravity..
scale ship values using Schoenherr's friction coefficients
with an addition öf 0.00035 for correlation allowance.
The following quantities were measured:
For turbulence stimulation, a trip wire of 1 mm dia- The longitudinal and lateral force and the yawing
meter was fitted to the, model at a section 5 per cent moment on the model with strain gauges mounted
of L aft .of fore perpendicular. The model was tested on the longitudinal and lateral arms.
in the loaded conditiom The propeller thrust, torque and rpm.
Further, model tests were conducted in the Shallow
The rUdder deflection.
Water Basin of the N.S.M.B., to determine the fòrces
The speed.
and moments acting on the model at different pro-
peller rpm's and rudder deflections. The waterdepth in The forces and moments acting on the model were
the basin corresponded to a waterdepth, at fUll scale, measured at speeds corresponding to 0, 2.5, 5.0 and
of 35 m. 7.5 knots and at 88, 77, 63 and 45 rpm of the screw.
4 Discussion oftest results At zero speed of the ship, the coefficient C will be
a measure for the way in whibh the rudder succeeds in
The propeller thrust and absorbed power for differeiit deflecting the propeller jet, Curvés according to this
ship speeds and propellet rpm s are given in diagram relation are presented in diagiam 3.
i (See appendix). Finally, the yawing moment N acting on the ship and
The results of the measurements of the forces and
curvesaccording to the relation
moments acting on the model are given in the dia-
grams 2, 3 and 4. N Y.l = C.lsin(ôô0)
In diagram 2 the longitudiñal force X acting on the are given in diagram 4;
ship mOdel is given for the ship's speeds considered Here ¡ denotes the distance obtained experimentally
V, = 0, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 knots, as a function of the between the centre of gravity of the ship and the point
rudder angle ô with the propeller rpm as a paiametet. of application of the lateral force. The distance 1 was
In addition curves according to the following rela- not influenced by the ship speed V,, the rudder angle 5
tiOn are presented in this diagram: and the propeller rpm
X = Tcos(ôô0)T0
With the aid of the results in diagram 3 and the
where T0 and ô0 denote the propeller thrust fôr the corresponding propeller thrust T it is possible to give
self-própulsioiì point of the ship and rudder angle for the coefficient C = Y/sin (ô ô) as a function of the
a straight course ahead respectively. This equation was propeller thrust with the ship speed and the propeller
based on the assumption that the fòrce on the rudder rpm as parameters. See figure 5.
is determined by the deflection of the propeller jet due
to the rudder angle. See fig. 4. At increasing ship speeds 500
the rudder force will also be caused by the speed of
advance of the rudder due to the main stream velocity.
Over the range of ship speed s considered here, how-
ever, this effect on the longitudinal force is negligible Loo
From the results given in diàgram 2 it can be seen that 's'
for the ship speeds and propeller rpm considered this
relation approximates adequately the test results

IAI.
The lateral force Y acting on the ship is given in 300 A
diagram 3 (see appendix). At increasing ship speeds the C
rudder force will not only be caused by the deflection
of the propeller jet due to the rudder angle but also by D
the speed in advance of the rudder due to the main 200
C.
stream velocity. Here the effect of the main Stream w

velocity is not negligible and therefore the lateral forçe 80RPM

Y was approximated by:


Y Csin(öô0) 100
dAt 4á1 lI 70
Limiting Line for
maximum power

in which C depends on propeller rpm and ship speed.

100 200 300 ¿00


T. propeller thrust (b tons).

Fig. 5. Relation between lateral force coefficient


C = Y/Sin (ô--ô,), Ship speed, propeller rpm and thrust.

In addition, the curve for the free running speed of


the ship and the limiting line for maximum power are
indicated in this figure.
The fact that the machinery will not work below a
certain number of revolutions is not taken into account
Fig. 4. Components of the measured longitudinal fórce in the results given in this figure. This number of revo-
X = TCOS (ò-50)T,. lutions depends strongly on the particular kind of
T = Propeller thrust
T, = Ship resistance machinery considered. With the aid of this figure 5 one
ô = Rudder angle is able to derive the forces generated by the rudder
'o

Thus it can be determined quantitatively to what tion of turning manoeuvres of the ship are given in
extent disturbing forces due to current, waves, wind figures 6 through 8.
and so on can be compensated.
to indIcate the wäy for entering the figure the
following example may be useful. For this ship with ____________________________________
a speed of 7.5 knots it can be derived in figure 5 from 500

the intersection of the steady ahead line and the speed


curve that at a rudder angle (5 of 30 degrees the lateral 4(I
- IffIIIItV(.JIrAiTI.!I
_________________________
FII.1f4;l*:4(.iIM,1
U
_____wvIáU
force Y amounts to be 110 x 55 tons. It can be
assumed that in practibe this ship never gives troubles

u,.
30 0
in relation to the rudder effectiveness at a speed of 7.5
knots. The conclusion can be drawn that a rudder
E
force of 55 tons i enough fòr controlling the ships in
all circumstances. From figure 5 it can also be derived
that at zero speed of the ship and with increased pro-
z

t
-- ..#..

peller rpm (rpm equal to about 65) the same lateral T ___________ RUDDER ANGLE:20°
IJILIJ
force can be obtained as in the case of the ship running o- - 100 200 ' 300 400 ' 500 600 700 60 o
ADVANCE IN rn----
steady ahead with a speed of 7.5 knots. In both cases
the rudder angle ô was assumed to be eqüal.. FrOm this Fig. 6. Turnability of ship at low speeds.
comparison it can be concluded that the ship can be
handled properly at very low speeds if the propeller 6

rpm is increased during manoeuvring.


In addition it can be seen from figure 5 that at a ship
speed of 7.5 knots the rudder effectiveness or the lateral I50TIAL SPEED 5KNOTS

force Y can be increased about 2 5 times by increasing RUDDER ANGLE 20°

the propeller rpm from .37.6 to maximum.


46RPM (INCREASED)

5 Manoeuvring at low speeds


Some manoeuvres of the ship at low speed will be
E30
z
z
3

200 SEC. AFTER ECUTE


- / 37.6RPM(INCREASED)
(

calculated now These calculations will be based on the


assumption that the motions of the ship are propor-
tional to the rudder force. Then the ship motions can
be written asc
FXCUTu OF RUDDER ANGLE
/TIMEOSECONDS

ADVANCE IN n
,
-200
__._-
_7 265 RPN (NOT ÍNEASEÖ)

600 700 600

i(t) =f(t).Y(ô) Fig. 7. Turnability of ship at low speed (5 knots) with in-
v(t) =g(t)Y(ô) creased propeller rpm and at a rudder angle of 20 degrees.

where fr(t) and v(t)denote the ship's heading and the


drift velocity respectively. 30

The adequacy of describing the ship's motions by


these relations were extensïvely discùssed by Brard [2] 25
INITIAL SPEED 2.SKNOTS
and Hawkins [3]. RUDDER ANGLE 20°
The functions f(t) and g(t) can be determined from CEA5ED

the rudder effectiveness K and the time constant T and


depend on the mass, the moment of inertia of the ship 15
200 SEC. AFTER EXECUT /
and the hydrodynamic characteristics such as the added
mass and' damping. For an analysis of these functións E10
z
reference is made to the investigations performed by z
u.
Davidson and Schiff [4], Nomoto [5], Norrbin [6] and u,
z (L
4
z
Shiba [7]. The K- and T-values of the ship under dis- z-

cussioñ were already given in [8]. (NOI INCREASED)

With the aid of the above relations, for the heading ADVANCE IN
so
m-
too 'sa 200 250 300 350 400

and the drift velocity of the ship, the turning manoeu- Fig 8. Turnability of ship at low speed (2.5 knots) with in-
vres can be' derived. Some of the results of the calcula- creased propeller rpm and at a rudder angle of 20 degrees.
11

From figtire 6 it can be seen that the turabiity of short, thus given "bursts" of increased rpm, the in-
the ship does not change very much with decreasing crease of the ship speed will remain low. The influence
ship speed. However, the handling of the ship at low of the increased propeller rpm on the turnability and
speeds will still give difficulties because the rudder speed of the ship at low speed has been shown.
forces are not large enough to compensate the dis-
turbing forces due to wind, current and other influen- References
ces. This fact has also been shown by Welnicki [9].
1. SIBLY, J, The Handling of Mammoth Tankers. Trans. Insti-
Therefore, as stated in the previous sections, the pro- tute of Navigation, May 1968.
peller rpm has to be increased in order tO enlarge. the
2 Bitn, R., Manoeuvring of ships in deep water, in shallow
rudder forces. The influence of an increase of the pro- water and in canals. Trans. S.N.AM.E., 1951.
peller rpm on the turning manoeuvre in still water is
HAWKINS, S. et al., The use of manoeuvring propulsion de
shown in figures 7 and 8 The corresponding increase vices on merchant ships. Publication of Robert Taggert In
of the ship speed is also indicated in these diagrams. corporated. Washington, 1965.
DAVIDSON,K. S. M. and J. L. Scrnn, Turning and course
keeping qia1ities.. Trans. S.N.A.M.E.;t946:
6 Conclusions
Noserro, K. et al., On the steering qualities of ships. Interna-
At very low speed of the ship and with increased pro- tional Shipbuildihg Progress, Vol. 4, 1957.
peller rpm the same lateral force or moment on the NoanniN, N. R, A study of course keeping and manoeuvring
ship can be obtained as in the case of the ship running performance. Publiintion no. 45, Swedish State Experimental
Tank, 196O
steady ahead at 7.5 knots. As the ship can be handled
properly at a speed of 7 5 knots, it may be expected Siim, H., Model experiments about the manoeuvrability and
tumthg of ships. David Taylor Model Basin. Report no. 1461.
that the ship can still be handled properly at lower
Hoot, J. P., The mànoeuvrability of ships on a straight
speeds by increasing the propeller rpm. The increase course. Neth. Ship Research Centre TNO Report no. 99S.
of the propeller rpm will lead to an increase of the
Wauaciu, W., Method of estimation of wind influence upon
ship speed. This is an inconvenient circumstance. the course keeping ability of ships with large superstructure.
However, by keeping the duration of increased rpm Trans. R.LN.A., 1963.
12

APPENDIX

¿0000- ¡,00

88Rpp,
30000 300
T, Thrust
DH P (in tons)
(rnetr 79

2000Ó 200

63

63

10000 100
¿5

25 se
VShip speed (in knots)
7.5 .0 25 5.0
Vs.Shipspeed(in knots)

Diagram I. Thrust and power of propellór in overload condition.


13

Results of model tests:


x 88RPM
D 77 .
o 63
+ 45
- Longitud ival force X T cos ( -S0)-10

-
(D
Ship speed 75kt Ship speed 5kt.
L.
o
U.
200 20 4
o X
L. u
4...
D)
E
(n X
C a
o
4.' u ij
°
X 100 D 100 o

w X
oL.
o o
o o
+

: + +
+

+ O
+ +
+ +

40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40
udder angLeS (degree).

i
Port Starboard

300

200
_i
ii oUi
I I

Ship speed 2.5kt


I

300

200
__Xo
3flIp pu

a
V V1

o
ou__.

!'i$ T'
X X

100 100
+ +

O O
0 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 4

Diagram 2. Longitudinal force X for different ship speeds, propeller rpm's and rudder angles.
14

Results of model tests:


88 RPM
o 77
o 63
+ 45
- Lateral force Y= C sin(&-80)
200 200
- Ship speed 7.5kt Ship speed 5 kt

L
4-
WD
u

-.nCL.o
0(5
I-
loo loo
N o

o YO

r -100 -100

-200 -200
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -40 -30 -20 10 0 10 20 30 40
Rudder angle.S (degree).
Port Starboard_

20 200
Ship speed 2.5kt Ship speed O kt

lo 100

N
-.--.-,'
YO YO

-10 -loo

-200 -200
-40 -30 -20 -10 O 10 20 30 40 -40 -30 -20 -10 O 10 20 30 40
& 8
Diagram 3. Lateral force Y for different ship speeds, propeller rpm's and rudder angles.
ResuLts of modeL tests: 15
X 88RPM
o 77
0 63
+ 45
N=Y.L

Ship speed 7.5 kt Ship speedskt


20 20

u
L.
w
E o lo
E
C o
2
D
D +
D I-
NO
4-

I.
-lo e

I.'

-20 20

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 3Ö O -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40


Rudder angLe1 (dègree)
port starboard

20 20
Ship speed 2.5 kt Ship speed O kt

10 10

NO NO

-10 -10

40 -30 -20 O O 10 20 30 40 3b -20 -io 10 20 30 40

Diagram 4. Yawing moment N for different ship speeds, propeller rpm's and rudder angles.
PUBLICATIONS OF THE NETHERLANDS SHIP RESEARCH CENTRE TNO
PUBLISHED AFTER 1963 (LIST OF EARLIER PUBLICATIONS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST)
PRICE PER COPY DFL. 10,-
M = engineering department S = shipbúilding dpartment C = corrosion and antifouling department

Reports
57 M Determination of the dynamic properties and propeller excited 87 5 Model experiments on sound transmission from engineroom to
vibrations of a special ship stern arrangement. R. Wereldsma, accommodation in motorships. J. H. Janssen, 1966.
I 964. 88 S Pitch and heave with fixed and controlled bow fins. J. H. Vugts,
58 5 Numerical calculation of vertical hull vibrations of ships by 1966.
discretizing the vibration system, J. de Vries, I 964. 89 5 Estimation of the natural frequencies of a ship's double bottom
59 M Controllable pitch propellers, their suitability and economy for by means of a sandwich theory. S. Hylarides, 1967.
large sea-going ships propelled by conventional, directly coupled 90 S Computation ofpitch and heave motions for arbitrary ship forms.
engines. C. Kapsenberg, 1964. W. E. Smith, 1967.
60 5 Natural frequencies of free vertical ship vibrations. C. B. Vreug- 91 M Corrosion in exhaust driven turbochargers on marine diesel
denhil, 1964. engines using heavy fuels. R. W. Stuart Mitchell, A. J. M. S. van
61 S The distributiOn of the hydrodynamic forces on a heaving and Montfoort and V. A. Ogale, 1967.
pitching shipmodel in still water. L Gerritsrna and W. Beukel- 92 M Residual fuel treatment on board ship. Part II. Comparative
man, 1964. cylinder wear measurements on a laboratory diesel engine using
62 C The mode of action of anti-fouling paints Interaction between filtered or centrifuged residual fueL A. de Moy, M. Verwoest
anti-fouling paints and sea water. A. M. van Lónden 1964. and G. G. van der Meulen, 1967.
63 M Corrosion in exhaust driven turbochargers on marine diesel 93 C Cost relations of the treatments of ship hulls and the fuel con-
engines using heavy fuels. R. W. Stuart Mitchell and V. A. Ogale,
1965.
sumptiòn of ships. H. J. Lageveen-van Kúijk, 1967.
64 C Barnacle fouling on aged anti-fouling paints; a survey of pertinent 94 C Optimum conditions for blast cleaning of steel plate. J. Rem-
literature and some recent observations. P. de Wolf, 1964. melts, 1967.
65 S The lateral damping and added mass of a horizontally oscillating 95 M Residual fuel treatment on board ship. Part I. The effect of cen-
shipmodel. G. vanLeeuwen, 1964. trifuging, filtering and homogenizing on the unsolubles in residual
66 S Investigations into the strength of ships' derricks. Part I. F. X. fuel. M. Vótwoest and F. J. Colon, 1967.
P. Soejadi, 1965. 96 S Analysis of the modified strip theory for the calculation of ship
67 S Heat-transfer in cargotanks of a 50,000 DWT tanker. D. J. van motions and wave bending moments. L Gerritsma and W. Beu-
der Heeden and L. L. Mulder, 1965. kelman, 1967.
68 M Guide to the application of method for calculation of cylinder 97 S On the efficacy of two different roll-damping tanks. J. Bootsma
liner temperatures in diesel engines. H. W. van Tijen, 1965. and J. J. van den Bosch, 1967.
69 M Stress measurements on a propeller model for a 42,000 DWT 98 5 Equation of motion coefficients for a pitching and heaving des-
tanker. R. Wereldsma, 1965. troyer model. W. E. Smith, 1967.
70 M Experiments on vibrating propeller models. R. Wereldsma, 1965. 99 S The manoeuvrability of ships on a straight course. J: P. Hooft,
71 5 Research on bulbous bow ships. Part II. A. Still water perfor 1967.
mance of a 24,000 DWT bulkcarrier with a large bulbous bow. 100 S Amidships forces and moments on a CB = 0.80 "Series 60"
W. P. A. van Lanimeren and J. J. Muntjewerf, 1965. model in waves from various directions. R. Wahab, 1967.
72 S Research on bulbous bow ships. Part II. B. Behaviour of a 101 C Optimum conditions for blast cleaning of steel plate. Conclusion.
24,00( DWT bulkcarrier with a large bulbous bow in a seaway.
W. P. A. van Lammeren and F. V. A. Pangalila, 1965. J. Remmelts, 1967.
73 S Stress and strain distribution in a vertically corrugatód bulkhead. 102 M The axial stiffness of marine diesel engine crankshafts. Part I.
H. E. Jaeger and P. A. van Katwijk, 1965. Comparison between the results of full scale measurements and
74 S Research on bulbous bow ships. Part I. A. Still water investiga- those of calculations according to published formulae. N. J.
tions into bulbous bow forms for a fast cargo liner. W. P. A. van Visser, 1967.
Lammeren and R. Wahab, 1965. 103 M The axial stiffness of marine diesel engine cran.kshafts. Part II.
75 S Hull vibrations of the cargo-passenger motor ship "Oranje Theory and results of scale model measurements and comparison
Nassau", W. van Horssen, 1965. with published formulae. C. A. M. van der Linden, 1967.
76 S Research on bulbous bow ships. Part I. B. The behaviour of a fast 104 M Marine diesel engine exhaust noise. Part I. A mathematical model.
cargo liner with a conventional and with a bulbous bow in a sea- J. H. Janssen, 1967.
way. R. Wahab, 1965. 105 M Marine diesel engine exhaust noise. Part II. Scale models of
77 M Comparative shipboard measurements of sUrface temperatures exhaust systems. J. Buiten and J. H. Janssen, 1968.
and surface corrosion in air cooled and water cooled turbine 106 M Marine diesel engine exhaust noise. Part ifi. Exhaust sound
outlet casings of exhaust driven marine diesel engine turbo- criteria for bridge wings. J. H. Janssen en J. Buiten, 1967.
chargers. R. W. Stuart Mitchell and V. A. Ogale, 1965. 107 S Ship vibration analysis by finite element technique. Part I.
78 M Stern tube vibration measurements of a cargo ship with special General review and application to simple structures, statically
afterbody. R. Wereldsma, 1965. loaded. S. Hylarides, 1967.
79 C The pre-treatment of ship plates: A comparative investigation 108 M Marine refrigeration engineering. Part I. Testing of a decentraI-
on some pre-treatment methods in use in the shipbuilding ised refrigerating instìlltiòn. J. A. Knobbout and R. W. J.
industry. A. M. van Londen, 1965. Kouffeld, 1967.
80 C The pre-treatment of ship plates: A practical investigation into 109 S A comparative study on four different passive roll damping tanks.
the influence of different working procedures in over-coating Part I. J. H. Vugts, 1968.
zinc rich epoxy-resin based pre-construction primers. A. M van 110 S Strain, stress and flexure of two corrugated and one plane bulk-
Londen and W. Mulder, 1965. head subjócted to a lateral, distributed load. R E. Jaeger and
81 5 The performance of U-tanks as a passive anti-rolling device. P. A. van Katwijk, 1968.
C. Stigter, 1966. 111 M Experimental evaluation of heat transfer in a dry-cargo ships'
82 S Low-cycle fatigue of steel structures. J. J. W. Nibbering and tank, using thermal oil as a heat transfer medium. D. J. van der
J. van Lint, 1966. Heeden, 1968.
83 5 Roll damping by free surfäce tanks. J. J. van den Bosch and 112 S The hydrodynamic coefficients for swaying, heaving and rolling
J. H. Vugts, 1966. cylinders in a free surface. J. H. Vugts, 1968.
84 S Behaviour of a ship in a seaway. J. Gerritsma, 1966. 113 M Marine refrigeration engineering. PartII. Some results of testing
85 S Brittle fracture of full scale structures damaged by fatigue. a decentralised marine refrigerating unit with R 502. J. A. Knob-
J. J. W. Nibbering, J. van Lint and R. T. van Leeuwen, 1966. bout and C. B. Colenbrander, 1968.
86 M Theoretical evaluation of heat transfer in dry cargo ship's tanks 114 S The steering of a ship during the stopping maîioeuvre. J. P.
using thermal oil as a heat transfer medium. D. J. van der Hooft, 1969.
Heeden, 1966. 115 S Cylinder motions in beam waves. J. H. Vugts, 1968.

You might also like