Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Thesis
Submitted to the
In
AQUACULTURE
By
Madhurima Sarker ~'{
B. F. Sc \,.\'o~
~~\.. s Q
c€.~\N0u~f-tr.J.J.·······
{) ...
u~~ ··········
P--\lto
Department of Aquaculture
Faculty of Fishery Sciences
WEST BENGAL UNIVERSITY OF ANIMAL AND FISHERY SCIENCES
Chakgaria Campus, Kolkata - 700 094, West Bengal, India
2015
(J)etficatetf to
fM.y (J)itfun antffM.aa43a6a
West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences
Certificate
This is to certify that the research work embodied in the thesis entitled "Comparative
efficacy of biofloc and feed based common carp (Cyprinus carpio, L.) production
system with special reference to environmental health" Submitted by Miss.
Madhurima Sarker in partial fulfillment of requirement for the degree of Master of
Fishery Science (Aquaculture) in the Faculty of Fishery Sciences, West Bengal
University of Animal And Fishery Sciences is the faithful and bonafide research work
carried out under my direct supervision and guidance. The results of investigation
reported in this thesis have not so far been submitted for any other degree or diploma.
The assistance and help received during the course of investigation have been duly
acknowledged.
Date: .......... .
Place: Chakgaria
Kolkata- 700094
WEST BENGAL UNIVERSITY OF ANIMAL AND FISHERY SCIENCES
APPROVAL SHEET
Signature
Name
I am intfe6ted to (J)r. P. (J3iswas, 'Vice Cfiance[fur, W.(J3. V.)f.. P.S.; <Prof S. (J3iswas, Contro[(er
of 'E.:{amination, W.(}3. V.)f.. 'F.S and <Prof (J3. 1(, (])as, (J)ean, 'Facu[ty of Pisnery Sciences as weff as
fionoured mem6er of tfie )f.dvisory Committee, for proviaing necessary infrastructure and otfier
facifities.
I fee( de[igfited to e:wress my deep sense of gratitude to <Prof :N. CR., Cfiattopadfiyay, <£.)(:
<Professor, (J)r. rt'K., qfiosfi, Senior ~ader, (J)r. (:Mrs.) Sangfiamitra (J3fiattacfiaryya, quest Lecturer,
©epartment of )f.quacuCture for tfieir precious assistance and constant inspiration during tfie entire
period of researcfi wort
I am o6[iged to <Prof S.S. (J)ana, fionoured mem6ers of tfie )f.dvisory Committee for va(ued
support and academic advisement on affoccasions.
I wisfi to offer my tfian~ :Manoj (])a and (J'apai (])a and tfie otfier mem6ers of tfie li6rary of
tfiis facuCty for supp(ying 600~, journalr and references and arrangement of interna[ internet facifity
at aff time.
I wouU fi/is to e:wress my specia[ tfian~ to, J{irma(ya tfa, Suftumar da, (J'aresfi da, '}(flusfiift
da, <Papri tfi for tfieir assistance during tfie period ofdissertation wort
I wisfi to e)(Jent my intfe6tedness and fieartiest tfian~ to my seniors, )f.mit (])a, (J3anasree tfi,
'lara di. and a[{ my otfier seniors for tfieir R,jntf fie{p during tfie neetffu[ time ofdissertation wort
I e)(Jentf my intfe6tness antf fieartiest tfian~ to my year mates Sudfiesna, 'lanusree, Suprit~
Sayantan~ )f.ntara, <Rjya, Sourav, )f.jit, )f.rfta, Susovon, Sofiom, <Pritam, J{antfan, (J'ufafi.,, <Puspendu,
(J3aijnatfi and otfiers for tfieir co-operation rendered to me for time tfirougfiout tfie period ofstutfy.
I wi.sfi to offer my tfian~ to my juniors lpsfiita, <fufiR.9, Sanjufa, Saurav, Sni[Jdfia and otfiers
for tfieir co-operation for compfetion of tfie wor{
Once again, I wouU filzy to e:q,ress my sincere and specia{ tfian~ to ;4.mit da andSfianRg.r da
for tfieir e:{Jreme co-operation at eacfi and every step of my researcfi wor{
I wouU filzy to e:q,ress my deep sense of gratituae and Cove to my 6ewved grandparents for
tfieir 6fessitl{J upon me.
Last, 6ut not tfie feast, I wi{{fai{from my duty, if I do not express my deep jeefitl{Js, to my
6ewved parents, sister <Banhi and a{{ tfie fami{y mem6ers and pisi, pison, mama, mami, masi, masi,
meso, jfietfiu, RJZ{u for tlieir CotlfJ pat'ience, support, sacrifice, encouragement, guidance, constant
inspiration and remark,g.6fe co-operation tfirough a{{ means.
Pina{(y, I ascri6e a{{ gCory to tfie gracious (jod from whom a{{ good thitl{Js come, who has
sfiowered a{{ his fjnd 6fessitl{JS and 6enevofent graces upon me in {ife, for 6estowing me witfi tfie
6fessitl{JS to see tfiis day.
Jno.dhluu~ ~
Place: Chakgaria Campus (Madhurima Sarker)
Date: tito,\o.~1'5
Avg. Average
BFT Biofloc Technology.
CR Community Respiration
DAP Di-ammonium Phosphate
DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
EDTA Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid
etc. Etcetera
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
FCE Food Conversion Efficiency
FCR Food Conversion Ratio
g Gram
GVA Gross Yalu Added
GDP Gross Domestic Production
Govt. Government
GPP Gross Primary Product
ha Hectare
ICAR Indian Council of Agricultural Research
Nos. Numbers
NPP Net Primary Product
Rs. Rupees
SGR Specific Growth Rate
SI. No. Serial Number
sp. Species
Wt. Weight
Yr. Year
CHAPTER PARTICULARS PAGE NO.
NO.
1. Introduction 1-4
2. Review of literatures 5-26
3. Materials and methods 27-32
4. Experimental Protocol 33
4. Results and Discussion 34-53
5. Summary and Conclusion 54-55
6. Future scope of Research 56
7. Bibliography I-XVIII
LIST OF FIGURES
SI.
Figure Page
No. Title of the Figures
No. No.
30
Modular trend of FCR in different treatments
4.2.30. 51
employed.
Aquaculture has always played a significant role in the economy by its contribution to
income and wealth through the supply of nutritious food (Pillai and Kathia, 2004).
Constituting about 5.68% of the global fish production, India today is the second largest
fish producing nation in the world. India is also a major producer of fish through
aquaculture and ranks second in the world after China. Fish production has increased from
41.57 lakh tonnes (24.47 lakh tonnes for marine and 17.10 lakh tonnes for inland fisheries)
in 1991-92 to 95.79 lakh tonnes (34.43 lakh tonnes for marine and 61.36 lakh tonnes for
inland fisheries) in 2013-14 (DAHDF, 2014). During the first two quarters of 2014-15,
the fish production is estimated at 4.37 million tonnes. The sector contributes about 0.92%
to the overall Gross Value Added (GVA) and 5.58% of the agricultural GVA at current
prices for the year 2013-14 (DAHDF, 2014). Fish and Fish Products export was 9,83,756
tonnes worth Rs. 30,213.26 crores during 2013-14 (DAHDF, 2014). The aquaculture
industry is growing fast at a rate of 9% per year since 1970's (FAO, 2008) but is going
through unsustainability in the meaning of environmentally and economically, haunted by
number of environmental and social issues (Boyd, 1990). Average growth in fish
production during 2013-14 was 5.9% (DAHDF, 2014). Fishery sector share 0.9% of total
GDP and 17.5% of total agricultural sector GDP (DAHDF, 2014).
Moreover, this sector plays a major role in the socio-economic development of the
country. It has been recognized as a powerful income and employment generator. It is a
source of cheap and nutritious food and a foreign exchange earner. Development of fishery
sector can ensure the food security as well as tackle the problem of unemployment.
Aquaculture continues to be the fastest growing animal food-producing sector and to
outpace population growth. Aquaculture contributed 48% of aquatic animal food for
human consumption in 2007 (FAO, 2012).
All forms of food production like any other human activity affect environment in one
way or another (Pillai, 1992). It is true in the case of aquaculture also. Land-based fish
farms produce effluents that may have, if not properly handled, a negative impact on the
quality of water courses, rivers and soil (Acierno and Zonno, 2010). Excessive
accumulation of toxic inorganic nitrogen from feed, faEces and other external factors in
the aquaculture ponds is always posing major threat to pond ecology, thus not only
deteriorating pond environment but also the environment of the surrounding aquatic
ecosystem (Kurup, 201 Ob). Over usage of antibiotics, disease and exotic fish transfer to
1
?nfrotfucfion
wild and omitting of heavy load nutrients are under consideration. In aquaculture, the
accumulated waste must be removed continuously to maintain optimal growth conditions
and the health of the cultured organism. The commercial success of fish farms and the
quality of aquaculture product will depend increasingly on their success in either
minimizing the production of waste or utilizing waste as inputs to other production
processes. Therefore, the management of solid wastes and dissolved substances is one of
the most important aspects in the aquaculture industry today. Over dependence of fish
meal and privatization of public common leads to physical conflicts among fishermen and
depletion of natural resources. All these factors searches opportunities for economic and
environmental developments permeate in to many facets of the industry (Kuhn et al.,
2010). The expansion of aquaculture is restricted due to land costs and by its strong
dependence on fishmeal and fish oil (Browdy et al., 2001; De Schryver et al., 2008). Such
ingredients are one of the prime constituents of feed for commercial aquaculture (Naylor
et al., 2000). Of the total production expenses 50% represents for feed cost, which is
predominantly due to the cost of protein component in commercial diet (Bender et al.,
2004). For the production of 1 kg live weight fish needs 1-3 kg dry weight feed (FCR is
about 1-3, Naylor et al., 2000). Of the total nitrogen input in culture ponds only 20-30%
retain in biomass and the rest becomes a polluting agent of the water by producing high
level toxicants such as ammonia and nitrite leads to eutrophication in the surrounding
water of the aquaculture farms (Briggs, and Funge-Smith, 1994; Jackson et al., 2003;
Thakur et al., 2003). Approximately 36% of feed excreted as in the form of organic waste.
Thus tool to make up industry more sustainable pond management should be geared
towards improving nutrient retention (Hari et al., 2006). In order to make aquaculture
industry more successful, it is imperative to develop technology that will increase
economic and environmental sustainability (Kuhn et al., 2010).
The rapid growth of aquaculture aimed at continued expansion is necessary to meet
future protein demand. This will depend upon: increasing productivity without
overburdening land and water resources, applying sustainable technologies which
minimize environmental effects and developing cost-effective production systems which
support economic and social sustainability. In order for aquaculture to be completely
successful, the industry will need to develop technology that will increase economic and
environmental sustainability (Kuhn et al., 2010). This technology implements cheaper
alternative ingredient to fishmeal and this will effectively reduce the costs of feed as feed
costs can account for 50% of operational expense (Van Wyk et al., 1999) while reducing
their impact on overexploited natural fisheries (Tacon et al., 2006 and Naylor et al., 2009).
The prime goal of aquaculture expansion must be to produce more aquaculture
products without significantly increasing the usage of the basic natural resources of water
and land (Avnimelech, 2009). The second goal is to develop sustainable aquaculture
systems that will not damage the environment (Naylor et al., 2000). The third goal is to
build up systems providing an equitable cost/benefit ratio to support economic and social
sustainability (A vnimelech, 2009). All these three prerequisites for sustainable
aquaculture development can be met by biofloc technology. The environmental friendly
aquaculture system called "Biofloc Technology (BFT)" is considered as an efficient
alternative system since nutrients could be continuously recycled and reused. The
principles of growing fish or shrimp in limited water exchange intensive ponds were
developed simultaneously for shrimp in the Waddel Mariculture Centre in the USA and
for fish, mostly tilapia, in Israel (Avnimelech et al., 1989; A vnimelech et al., 1994;
Hopkins et al., 1993; Chamberlain and Hopkins, 1994) and practiced in the USA (Serfling,
2000), in the beginning of the 1990's. Bio floe technology is for increasing the production
and reducing the harmful chemicals from the aquaculture systems (Avnimelech, 2003;
2010). This technique is also referred as the built in bioreactors (Kurup, 2010b). BFT is
successfully employed both in shellfish and finfish culture systems (Milstein et al., 2001;
Burford et al., 2003, 2004; Avnimelech, 2005; Wasielsky et al., 2006; Serfling, 2006). In
BFT, minimum water discharge and reuse of water prevent environment degradation and
convert such system in a real "environmentally friendly system" with a "green" approach.
Minimum water exchange maintain the heat and fluctuation of temperature is prevented
(Crab et al., 2009) allowing growth of tropical species in cold areas. Currently, BFT has
received alternate appellation such as ZEAH or Zero Exchange. The basic principle is the
production of microbial floes that attach to each other (Burford et al., 2004). These
microbial-floes either float or are suspended at the bottom and become a nutritious food
for fish. In these systems, a co-culture of heterotrophic bacteria and algae is grown in floes
under controlled conditions within the culture pond. The system is based on the
knowledge of conventional domestic wastewater treatment systems and is applied in
aquaculture environments. Microbial biomass is grown on fish excreta resulting in a
removal of these unwanted components from the water. The major driving force is the
intensive growth of heterotrophic bacteria. The carbon sources play a pivotal role in the
biofloc formation, composition and its nutritive values (Hollender et al., 2002; Oehmen et
.Sf.lrker, M., M. 'F. Sc. 'Thesis, 20f7, Oepl. of7lttuf.lcufture 3
'Jnfrolucfion
al., 2004). The bioflocs production depends on the quality of added substrate and its C:N
ratio (A vnimelech, 2007). So, the organic carbon can be supplied either as additional
organic carbon source like glucose, acetate, glycerol etc. or by changing the feed
composition by increasing its organic carbon content (Avnimelech, 1999). Carbohydrates
and lipids are cheaper energy sources compared to proteins. Optimal level of protein and
the protein-sparing effect of non-protein nutrients such as lipids or carbohydrates may be
effective in reducing feed costs (Gumus and Ikiz, 2009). Added advantages of this system
are that the protein content of the feed provided can be reduced without resulting in a high
FCR, and the feed waste can be minimized.
According to Kuhn et al. (2010), initial cost estimates for biofloc production is
approximately $400 to $1000 per ton of dry ingredients which is projected to be less than
the ingredients such as fishmeal and within the range for soybean meal. Over the period
of January 2008 to May 2009, the global fishmeal market varied from a low mean of about
$900 to a high mean of $1250 per metric ton. During the same time frame, soybean meal
varied approximately from a low mean of $375 to a high mean of $550 (FAO, 2009).
Aquaculture production of an important tilapia species, Oreochromis niloticus, more than
doubled between 2001 and 2007 from 1,030,888 tonnes to 2,121,009 tonnes (FAO, 2010).
Production of the most commonly cultured marine shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, more
than doubled from 9,82,663 tonnes in 2003 to 2,296,630 tonnes in 2007 (FAO, 2010).
Thus the use of biofloc represents a viable and more sustainable feed option due to cost,
the manner in which it is generated, and the potential that it can ease the pressure on wild
fisheries by reducing at least some of the demand for fishmeal.
With this background, the proposed research work is designed to investigate the
potential of biofloc as substitute of supplementary feed in common carp (Cyprinus carpio,
L.) culture and to assess the qualitative change in environmental health of the culture
system under biofloc treatment over conventional feed applied culture system. Therefore,
the present study has been designed with the following objectives:
i) To investigate the potential of biofloc as substitute of supplementary feed
in Common carp (Cyprinus carpio, L.) culture.
ii) To assess the qualitative change in environmental health of the culture
syatem under biofloc treatment over conventional feed applied culture
system.
5
'Rftview ofl:.iferafure
6
'f<lview ofl.i{era{ure
meal, wheat bran, rice bran, blood and bone meal and fish meal etc. are being used in fish feed
formulation. Feeds are used in aquaculture to increase aquatic animal production above that
possible with fertilizers and manures (Boyd and Tucker, 1998). Aquafeed, being considered
the most vital input cost, occupy almost 50-70% of the budget allocation for production
(Anon, 1983; Veerina et al., 1993).
In addition to the growing demand for seafood for human consumption, the demand for
aquatic products used by the industrial sector for conversion into fishmeal and fish oil products
also increases (Peron et al., 2010). About 5-6 million tonne oflow-valu e/trash fish are used
as direct feed in aquaculture worldwide either provided without processing or as part of farm-
made feeds (FAO, 2009) and about 1.9 kg of wild fish is required for every kilogram of fish
produced (Naylor et al., 2000). Therefore, research in recent times has focused on the
development of feed substitution strategies with a minimal supply of fishmeal and fish oil,
which are then replaced by alternative and cheaper sources of protein such as plant proteins.
This inspired researchers to develop the biofloc technology, which is also applicable to
intensive and semi-intensive systems.
2.3. Biofloc technology
Biofloc technology (BFT) is a new technology that is basically the retention of waste and
its conversion to biofloc as a natural food within the culture system. Biofloc technology
promotes suspended growth in ponds, consisting of phytoplankton, bacteria, and aggregates
of living and dead particulate organic matter and grazers of bacteria (Hargreaves, 2006) in
order to recycle feed residues and raise feed efficiencies. This is based upon the basic
principle of the activated suspension technique and the C/N ratio maintenance. If carbon and
nitrogen are well balanced in water, the nitrogenous waste generated by the cultivated
organisms especially ammonia will be consumed into bacterial biomass and increase in C/N
ratio stimulates heterotrophic bacterial production (Schneider et al., 2005). Through the
decomposition of organic matter by microorganisms leads to the production of new bacterial
cell amounting 40-60% of the metabolized organic matter (A vnimelech, 1999). This aerobic
decomposition can be higher in high C/N ratio (through the addition carbohydrate source
8
'Rlview off.ilerafure
cost of production by reducing the protein content of the artificial feed and improving the
overall economics (Mcintosh, 1999; Moss, 2002).
2.3.1. The role of microorganisms
In BFT, microorganisms play key role in nutrition of cultured animals as this macro-
aggregate is rich in protein and lipid available in situ all the time (Hari et al., 2006). Bioflocs
also provide the substrate required by most bacteria and can supply some refuge from
predators (De Schryver et al., 2008). In the water column occurs a complex interaction
between organic matter, physical substrate and large range of microorganisms such as
phytoplankton, free and attached bacteria, aggregates of particulate organic matter and
grazers, such as rotifers, ciliates and flagellates protozoa and copepods (Ray et al., 2010).
Regarding to maintenance of water quality, control of bacterial community over autotrophic
microorganisms is achieved using a high carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N) (Avnimelech et al.,
1994) which nitrogenous by-products can be easily taken up by heterotrophic bacteria
(A vnimelech, 1999). High carbon to nitrogen ratio is required to guarantee optimum
heterotrophic bacteria growth (Avnimelech, 2007; Emerenciano et al., 2012), using this
energy for maintenance (respiration, feeding, movement, digestion, etc), but also for growth
and to produce new cells. High carbon concentration in water could supersede the carbon
assimilatory capacity of algae, contributing to bacteria growth. Aerobic microorganisms are
efficient in converting feed to new cell material (40-60% of conversion efficiency), rather than
higher organisms that spend about 10-15% to rise in weight (Avnimelech, 2012).
Bacteria and other microorganisms act as very efficient "biochemical systems" to degrade
and metabolize organic residues (A vnimelech, 1999). In other words, they recycle very
efficiently nutrients in a form of organic and inorganic matter (un-consumed and non-digested
feed, metabolic residues and carbon sources applied as fertilizers) into new microbial cells.
The carbon sources applied in BFT are often by-products derived from human and/or animal
food industry, preferentially local available. Cheap sources of carbohydrates such as
molasses, glycerol and plant meals (i.e. wheat, com, rice, tapioca, etc) will be applied before
fry/post-larvae stocking and during grow-out phase, aiming to maintain a high C:N ratio (-15-
9
'l<lview ofl.iferafure
20: 1) and to control N compounds peaks. Also, a mix of plant meals can be pelletized ("green-
pellet") and applied into ponds (Taw, 2010) or low protein diets containing high C: N ratio
can also be carried out (Avnimelech, 2012; Azim and Little, 2008). The carbon source serves
as a substrate for operating BFT systems and production of microbial protein cells
(Avnimelech, 1999). There are many considerations for its selection such as costs, local
availability, biodegradability and efficiency of bacteria assimilation.
2.3.2. Mechanisms of binding microbial cells into floes
The flocculation of microbial communities is a complex process. Within the floe's
matrix, a combination of physical, chemical and biological phenomena is operating. The exact
mechanisms and the methods to engineer microbiological floes remain largely unknown. The
main constituents that can be found within the floe matrix are the extracellular polymeric
substances. These structures form a matrix that encapsulates the microbial cells, and play a
major role in binding the floe components together. The Factors influencing floe formation
in bio-flocs technology presence of these structures in activated sludge systems can be
substantial, up to 80% of the total mass (Hantula and Bamford, 1991; Liu and Fang, 2003).
They are typically made up of polysaccharides, proteins, humic compounds, nucleic acids and
lipids (Zita and Hermansson, 1994). They are produced as slime or capsule layers under
various nutritional conditions but particularly in case of limitation by nutrients such as e.g.
nitrogen (Steiner et al., 1976).
2.3.3. Basic types of biofloc systems
2.3.3.1. In-Situ Bioflocs
In-situ bioflocs are formed in culture ponds or tanks by manipulating the carbon: nitrogen
ratio (C:N) to values of 8: 1 or higher. This can be accomplished by supplementing a carbon
source such as sucrose, molasses, and glycerin or calcium acetate. Alternatively, it has been
shown that low-protein feeds can also result in a higher C:N ratio in the culture water.
Providing the appropriate C:N ratio promotes the growth of heterotrophic bacteria while
assimilating ammonia directly from the water column into bacteria biomass. Under high C:N
ratio conditions, heterotrophic bacteria are the primary components of bioflocs. Shrimp and
fish can graze on these bioflocs for nutrition (Kuhn et al., 2010).
2.3.3.2. Ex-Situ Bioflocs
Ex-situ bioflocs are formed in suspended-growth biological reactors. Biological reactors
can be employed to remove accumulated solids and nitrate from aquaculture production
effluent waters. Carbon supplementation can also be used to promote biological activity.
Bioflocs produced in the biological reactors can be used as a feed supplement for shrimp or
fish. The cleaned effluent water can then be reused for aquaculture production or discharged
from the production facility (Kuhn and Lawrence, 2012).
2.4. Factors influencing floe formation and floe structure in bioflocs technology
2.4.1. Mixing intensity
The mixing intensity imposed by a chosen aeration device at a certain power input will
determine the steady-state floe size, this is the equilibrium between the rate of aggregation
and the rate of breakage, and the floe size distribution (Chaignon et al., 2002; Spicer and
Pratsinis, 1996). In aquaculture, energy dissipation in general is in the range of 1-10 W/m3
(Boyd, 1998). However, in highly intensive systems, more realistic values can reach up to
100 W/m3. At higher mixing intensities and thus higher shear rates, the average floe size
decreases due to increased floe breakage. Biggs and Lant (2000) showed in case of activated
sludge that for a mean shear rate or G-value of 19.4/s (0.4 W/m3), the stable floe-size was ca.
130 µm, whereas, this was decreased to ca. 20 µm for a velocity gradient of346/s (120 W/m3).
The relationship between floe size and mixing intensity has been represented by Parker et al.
(1972) with the power law relationship d = C.G-x, where d is the maximum stable floe size,
G is the average velocity gradient, C is the floe strength component and x is the stable floe
size component. For BFT, the steady-state floe size is an important feature as it has already
been shown that the quality of food for different aquaculture species is also dependent on the
food size (Garatun-Tjeldsto et al., 2006; Knights, 1983). In order to represent a nutrition
source, the food particle size in case of e.g. cod larvae and Macrobrachium rosenbergii larvae
should be within the range of250-1200 µm (de Barros and Valenti, 2003).
Oehmen et al., 2004). It was observed e.g. that the dosing of acetate in a sequence batch
reactor (SBR) resulted mainly in poly-B- hydroxybutyrate (PHB) as storage polymer while
these were 3- hydroxy-2-methylvalerate and polyhydroxyvalerate in case of propionate dosing
(Yagci et al., 2007). Also, the costs of the different organic carbon sources will be a
determining choice factor (Salehizadeh and Van Loosdrecht, 2004).
2.4.4. Organic loading rate
The organic loading rate at which the organic carbon source is dosed in the water is a
major process technical factor. Filamentous bacteria have an advantage over non- filamentous
bacteria at low substrate levels due to their higher surface-to-volume ratio. Moreover, the
filaments can penetrate outside the floes and thus are exposed to higher substrate
concentrations than the non-filamentous bacteria that mainly grow within the floes (Martins
et al., 2003). The organic carbon feeding strategy can also be important for BFT. The organic
carbon can be added in small amounts and thus almost continuous mode or be added in larger
doses but at regular time intervals (e.g. 1/d). The second type of application is also known as
a feast and famine regime (Salehizadeh and Van Loosdrecht, 2004) and results in transient
conditions of substrate availability. The microbial biomass stores cellular reserves like PHB
under conditions of excess nutrient availability with which the microorganisms can bridge the
periods of nutrient shortage. The storage products may be of high importance to the added
value that bioflocs bring to aquaculture. As such, it may not be advisable to apply the organic
carbon sources in continuous mode if the goal is to produce reserve materials.
2.4.S. Temperature and pH
Changes in pH determine the stability of the bioflocs present in the ponds (Mikkelsen et
al., 1996). The influence of temperature on biofloc is complex. Wilen et al. (2000) found that
deflocculation of the floes occurred at lower temperature (4 °C) compared to higher
temperatures (18-20°C), probably due to a decrease of the microbial activity within the floes.
Krishna and Van Loosdrecht (1999) observed that higher temperatures (30-35°C) resulted in
bulking of the sludge (SVI % 500 ml/g) due to the excessive production of extracellular
polysaccharides. Therefore, it can be expected that an intermediate water temperature of 20-
25°C would be best to obtain stable floes with an intermediate floe volume index of about 200
ml/g. The temperature is of major importance for the microbial metabolism, also concerning
the previously mentioned storage polymers that may be important for aquaculture. It was
shown that higher temperatures (35°C) can result in up to 75% less PHB formation compared
to lower temperatures (l 5°C) (Krishna and Van Loosdrecht, 1999).
2.5. Composition and nutritional value of bioflocs
Bioflocs are aggregates (floes) of algae, bacteria, protozoans, and other kinds of
particulate organic matter such as feces and uneaten feed. Each floe is held together in a loose
matrix of mucus that is secreted by bacteria, bound by filamentous microorganisms, or held
by electrostatic attraction. Diatoms are found both in and outside ofbiofloc particles and have
been implicated in improving shrimp growth (Ju et al., 2009). The biofloc community also
includes animals that are grazers of floes, such as some zooplankton and nematodes. Large
bioflocs can be seen with the naked eye, but most are microscopic. Floes in a typical green
water biofloc system are rather large, around 50 to 200 microns, and will settle easily in calm
water.
The nutritional quality of biofloc to cultured animals is good but rather variable. The dry-
weight protein content of biofloc ranges from 25-50%. Biofloc communities can have fatty
acid profiles distinctly unique from the feed administered to culture systems (Johnson et al.,
2008). Fat content ranges from 0.5-15% and 15-20% carbohydrate. There are conflicting
reports about the adequacy of bioflocs to provide the often limiting amino acids methionine
and lysine. Diatoms in and around biofloc contain relatively high levels of the essential fatty
acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (Volkman et al., 1989),
providing a potential nutritional advantage for culture animals. Bioflocs are good sources of
vitamins and minerals, especially phosphorus. Dried bioflocs have been proposed as an
ingredient to replace fishmeal or soybean meal in aquafeeds. The most important factors
determining the feasibility of biofloc as a feed in aquaculture is the high protein,
polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and lipid content (De Schryver, 2010). Floe enhanced
animal growth from its nutrients and micronutrients (Moss and Pruder, 1995) and improved
animal product quality, such as color and sensory properties from pigments such as
astaxanthin and flour materials (e.g. bromophenols) (Whitefield et al., 1997; Breithaupt,
2004). Ju et al. (2008) reported that on the basis of EAA and EAAI protein fractions of the
floe, if it is algae dominated or bacteria dominated were comparable to those of fish or soybean
meal. Due to this comparability biofloc is now used as a replacement ingredient for meal and
it was applied in nursery, grow out and in latest the breeding system of shrimp and fish.
2.6. Present status of biofloc aquaculture in World and India
The number of shrimp farms currently using biofloc technology is not known, but some
prominent examples are Belize Aquaculture Ltd., in Belize and P. T. Central Pertiwi Bahari
in Indonesia. The success or failure of the technology is mainly due to the degree of
understanding of basic concepts of the technology in commercial application. Belize
Aquaculture was the first commercial farm to use biofloc technology successfully. Its
production of 13.S MT shrimp/ha was quite an achievement at the time. Biofloc technology
has become a popular technology in the farming of tilapia, Penaeus monodon, Litopenaeus
vannamei and M rosenbergii. It has been applied with success in shrimp farming in Indonesia
and Australia (Taw, 2010). BFT farms are successfully run in Maryland, USA and
successfully expanded in Latin and Central America, South Korea, Brazil, China, Italy,
Indonesia, Australia (Taw, 2010) and India. Research institutes of many countries now
concentrate to more application of Biofloc technology such as energy kinetics, bacterial
identification and economics, low cost processing etc.
In Belize 13.5 mt shrimp/ha was an achievement at the time. The same model is applied
m Indonesia. The technology combined with partial harvest was repeated in northern
Sumatra, Medan, Indonesia with better results during 2008 and 2009. Now biofloc technology
is common in Bali and Java. In Indonesia intensification of shrimp aquaculture is doing in
HDPE lined and plastic sheet covered ponds by using this technology. Malaysia is currently
initiating a 1000 ha integrated shrimp farming project at Seitiu, Terengganu by Blue
Archipelagio. The technology combined with partial harvest was repeated in Medan,
Indonesia, with better results. During 2008 and 2009, biofloc technology was used in Java
15
'Rfview of.f.iferafure
and Bali successfully. In Indonesia, biosecurity protocols were incorporated within .the
technology. Most Indonesian shrimp farmers are interested in biofloc technology, but with
some reservations, as a number of projects have failed due to incomplete understanding of the
technology. For example, the correct number and position of paddle wheel aerators used in
ponds are essential (Taw, 2010). Malaysia is currently initiating a 1,000-ha integrated
intensive shrimp-farming project at Setiu, Terengganu by Blue Archipelago.
In India this technology is not yet popular. This technology was first applied in the
extensive culture system of P. monodon, in Kerala, by School of Industrial Fisheries, Cochin
University of Science and Technology (Hari et al., 2004, 2006). It was proved that its
application is possible in the larval culture of Macrobrachium rosenbergii by biofloc system
(Saritha, 2009; Saritha and Kurup, 2011). Nursery rearing of the same species with the BFT
gave an opportunity for improving the larval stocking density and animal health welfare
compared to normal conventional systems (Prajith and Kurup, 2011). This technology also
applied in the hatchery phase of P. monodon by Devi and Kurup (2011 ).
2.7. Biofloc systems and water quality in ponds
Bioflocs technology has become a sustainable technique used in aquaculture to maintain
good in-situ water quality. This biological phenomenon happens through the development
and control of dense heterotrophic microbial bioflocs by adding carbohydrate to the water
(A vnimelech et al., 1989; Avnimelech, 1999; Crab et al., 2007; Crab et al., 2009). However,
research has shown that the capacity of the BFT to control the water quality in the culture
system and the nutritional properties of the floes are influenced by the type of carbon source
used to produce the floes (Crab, 2010). According to Avnimelech and Ritvo (2003), only
about 25% of the feed nutrients are converted into harvestable products hence contributing to
high nitrogen residues in aquaculture water, especially total ammonia nitrogen. The main
nitrogen pathways that naturally remove ammonia nitrogen in aquaculture systems include
photoautotrophic removal by algae, autotrophic bacterial conversion of ammonia-nitrogen to
nitrate-nitrogen, and heterotrophic bacterial conversion of ammonia-nitrogen directly to
microbial biomass (Ebeling et al., 2006). Therefore, development of dense heterotrophic
16
'R§view of£.iferafure
microbial floes in ponds can accelerate the biological 'cleaning' of organic and inorganic
wastes in ponds (Avnimelech, 2005; Azim et al., 2003a). The periphyton community also
play significant role in water quality control in aquatic systems. They consist of attached
aquatic biota on submerged substrates and harbours algae, bacteria, fungi, protozoa,
zooplankton and other invertebrates (Azim and Wahab, 2005). Given adequate light ofup to
about 0.5 meter depth in the water, periphytonne can perform high rates of photosynthesis and
autotrophic production (Craggs et al. 1996; Vermaat, 2005). In this process, periphytonne
entraps organic detritus, removes nutrients from the water column and helps controlling the
dissolved oxygen concentration, suspended solids and the pH of the surrounding water (Azim
et al., 2002; Dodds, 2003). Periphyton has an average C/N ratio of 10 (Azim and Asaeda,
2005) and nitrogen assimilation capacity of about 0.2 gNm-2day- 1• From this it is clear that
one needs a large surface, which allows periphytonne growth, to treat intensive aquaculture
wastewater.
2.8. The "natural probiotic" effect of biofloc
Biofloc can be a novel strategy for disease management in contrast to conventional
approaches such as antibiotic, antifungal, probiotic and prebiotic application. The "natural
probiotic" effect in BFT could act internally or externally against, Vibrio sp. and ectoparasites,
respectively. This effect is promoted by large groups of microorganisms, but mainly bacteria.
Internally, bacteria and its synthesized compounds could act similar to organic acids and might
be effective biocontrol agents, also given beneficial host's microbial balance in the gut (Sinha
et al., 2008). The regular addition of carbon in the water is known to select for
polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) accumulating bacteria and other groups of bacteria that
synthesize PHA granules. The microbial storage product poly-B-hydroxybutyrate (PHB), a
biodegradable polymer belonging to the polyesters class, is only one compound of a whole
family of polyhydroxyalkanoates. PHB is produced by a widely variety of microorganisms
such as Bacillus sp., Alcaligenes sp., Pseudomonas sp. from soluble organic carbon and is
also involved in bacterial carbon metabolism and energy storage (Sinha et al., 2008). This
polymer could comprise -80% of the bacteria's cell dry matter and up to 16% on biofloc dry
weight (De Schryver et al., 2012). Different carbon sources or structures of carbon substrate
will result in varying types of PHA (De Schryver et al., 2012). Such granules are synthesized
under conditions of physiological and nutrient stress, i.e., when an essential nutrient like
nitrogen is limited in the presence of an excess carbon source (Sinha et al., 2008). When these
polymers are degraded in the gut, they could have antibacterial activity similar to short chain
fatty acids (SCF As) or organic acids. The breakdown of PHA inside the gastrointestinal tract
can be carried out via chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis (Yu et al., 2005). Enzyme
hydrolysis is carried out by extracellular depolymerases activities of bacteria and fungi, acting
as a preventive or curative protector against Vibrio sp. infections and stimulates growth and
survival of shrimp and fish larvae (De Schryver et al., 2012). The working mechanism of
PHAs with respect to their antibacterial activity is not well understood (Sinha et al., 2008).
As they could act similarly to SCFA, some studies speculated the working mechanism by (i)
reduction of pH, in which antibacterial activity increases with decreasing pH value (Ricke,
2003); (ii) inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria by interference on cell membrane
structure and membrane permeability, as well as instability of internal proton balance,
lowering ATP and depletion of cellular energy (Russel, 1992); and (iii) down-regulate
virulence factor expression and positively influence the gut health of animals (Teitelbaum and
Walker, 2002). Further research is need to maximizing PHA content in bioflocs applied, i.e.,
for fish/shrimp feed, characterizing and analyzing their bio-control efficacy in different host-
microbe systems (Sinha et al., 2008). Externally, the working mechanism of biofloc
microorganisms against pathogens seems to be by competition of space, substrate and
nutrients. Some essentials nutrients such as nitrogen are required by both groups (i.e.
heterotrophic bacteria vs. Vibrio sp.) limiting their growth. Inhibiting compounds excreted by
BFT microorganisms, light intensity and type of carbon source also could reduce pathogens
growth. Unfortunately, limited information is available on this field. In a study with fish
fingerlings (Emerenciano et al., 2009) was reported that tilapia (initial weight 0.98 ± O.lg)
reared under BFT limited water-exchange condition (FLOC) presented less ectoparasites in
18
'Rflview of f:iferafure
gills and ectoderm's mucous as compared to conventional water-exchange system (CW) after
60 days.
2.9. Bioflocs as biosecurity in aquaculture systems
Green water technology in aquaculture development has been received with varied
perceptions. With the bad publicity that aquaculture has received in regards to mishandling
of antibiotics, scientists have continued to explore safe ways of arresting pathogenic infections
in aquaculture facilities without using antibiotics (Naylor et al., 2000). According to Defoirdt
et al. (2011), most antibiotics are no longer effective in treating bacterial disease because of
resistance developed to them by bacteria. Crab et al. (2010) reported that biofloc technology
could be a possible alternative to fight pathogenic bacteria in aquaculture facilities. Some
groups of bacteria in bioflocs have been found to conduct quorum quenching, which is the
disruption of bacterial cell-to-cell communication (quarumsensing) with small signal
molecules (Defoirdt et al., 2008). In fact, Defoirdt et al. (2004) reported that disruption of
bacterial cell-to-cell communication mechanism prevents expression of virulence factors thus
creating a disease free environment. Studies of Lezama-Cervantes and Michel (2010) on the
role of biofloc in shrimp production revealed that primary production and promotion of in situ
microbial populations, as is the case in biofloc technology, are beneficial for shrimp. Indeed
this can be extended to tilapia culture as well. Recently, scientists have hypothesized
possibilities of immunostimulatory features of the bioflocs leading to enhancement of the
immunity of fish to provide broad-based resistance towards many infections (Crab et al.,
2012). According to Wang et al. (2008), existing immuno-stimulants are group of live and
synthetic compounds including bacteria and bacterial products, complex carbohydrates,
nutritional factors, animal extracts, cytokines, lectins and plant extracts. Therefore bioflocs
might also contain immunostimulatory compounds since biofloc technology deals with
bacteria and bacterial products.
palatability and digestibility for the cultured organisms (Crab, 201 O; Crab et al., 2010a).
Overall, bioflocs produced on glycerol gave the best results (Crab, 2010) and tend to have
higher n-6 fatty acids content when compared to bioflocs grown on acetate or glucose (Crab
et al., 2010a).
In addition, not only the carbon source, but also the indigenous microbiota present in the
pond water will put forth a characteristic effect that needs to be considered. An important
factor here is to determine the role of algae and their interaction with the bacteria in the
bioflocs. Crab (2010) showed that with L. vannamei, bioflocs grown on glucose lacked
accessibility and palatability for good survival and growth. A worthy carbon source to look
at in this regard is molasses obtained during sugar processing of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.
v. altissima), which contains glycine betaine, a known attractants used in aquaculture (Felix
and Sudharsan, 2004; Makela et al., 1998).
The choice of cultivated species with biofloc technology should take into account their
capability of dealing with high suspended solid concentrations, since this negatively affects
certain fish species. Another important factor that is essential for the growth and survival of
aquaculture species are vitamins. Vitamin C concentrations in bioflocs ranging from Oto 54
µgig dry matter (Crab, 2010). These values are below the required concentration for fish and
shrimp. Besides vitamin C, other vitamins such as thiamine, riboflavin, pyridoxine,
pantothenic acid, nicotinic acid, biotin, folic acid, vitamin B 12, inositol, choline, vitamin A,
vitamin 03, vitamin E and vitamin K, are usually not sufficiently synthesized by the cultured
organism either and need to be supplied through the feed (Crab et al., 201 Oa). Hence, it needs
to be established to what extent bioflocs can contribute to the supply of these essential
nutrients.
2.10.2. Nursery and grow-out
Nursery phase is defined as an intermediate step between hatchery-reared early postlarvae
and grow-out phase (Mishra et al., 2008). Such phase presents several benefits such as
optimization of farm land, increase in survival and enhanced growth performance in grow-out
ponds (Apud et al., 1983; Sandifer et al., 1991; Arnold et al., 2009). BFT has been applied
21
'R.eview off.iferafure
successfully in nursery phase in different shrimp species such as L. vannamei (Mishra et al.,
2008; Samocha et al., 2007), P. monodon (Arnold et al., 2009), F. paulensis (Ballester et al.,
2010; Asaduzzaman et al., 2008), F. brasiliensis (Emerenciano et al., 2012; Souza et al.,
2011) and F. setiferus (Emerenciano et al., 2009). The primary advantage observed is related
to a better nutrition by continuous consumption of biofloc, which might positively influence
grow-out performance (AQUACOP, Le Moullac and Damez, 1991; Emerenciano et al.,
2007). In addition, optimization of farm facilities provided by the high stocking densities in
BFT nursery phase seems to be an important advantage to achieve profitability in small farms,
mainly in cold regions or when farmers are operating indoor facilities. It (Emerenciano et al.,
2011 b) was observed that presence of bioflocs resulted in increases of 50% in weight and
almost 80% in final biomass in F. paulensis early postlarval stage when compared to
conventional clear-water system. This trend was observed even when postlarvae were not fed
with a commercial feed (biofloc without commercial feed). In L. vannamei nursery in BFT
conditions, references (Mishra et al., 2008) and (Cohen et al., 2005) reported survival rates
ranging from 55.9% to 100% and 97% and 100%, respectively. Growth and survival was not
affected by stocking density (2500 vs. 5000 PUm2 ), therefore greater production outputs were
achieved at the higher density (Arnold et al., 2009). Furthermore, in (Emerenciano et al.,
2012) was found that F. brasiliensis postlarvae grow similarly with or without pelletized feed
in biofloc conditions during 30 day of nursery phase, which was 40% more than conventional
clear-water continuous exchange system.
In grow-out, BFT has been also shown nutritional and zootechnical benefits. It (Burford
et al., 2004) was estimated that more than 29% of the daily food intake of L. vannamei
consisted of microbial floes, decreasing FCR and reducing costs in feed. The reference
(Wasielesky et al., 2006) showed that juveniles of L. vannamei fed with 35% CP pelletized
feed grew significantly better in biofloc conditions as compared to clear-water conditions. It
(Ray et al., 2010) was showed that controlling the concentration of particles in super-intensive
shrimp culture systems can significantly improve shrimp production and water quality. It
(Krummenauer et al., 2011) was evaluated the stocking density in a 120 day of L. vannamei
22
"R$view of fJferalure
BFT culture, reporting consistent survival of 92, 81 and 75% with 150, 300 and 450
shrimp/m2, respectively. Moreover, the study (Samocha et al., 2004) performed in a
heterotrophic-based condition detected no significant difference in FCR when feeding L.
vannamei 30% and 45% CP diets and 39% and 43% CP diets, respectively. It well known
that protein, peptides and amino acids participate fully in synthesis of new membranes,
somatic growth and immune function and biofloc can potentially provide such ingredients.
For fish and other species, BFT also has been demonstrated encouraged results. Intensive
BFT Oreochromis niloticus tilapia culture could produce an equivalent of 155 tonne/ha/crop
(Rakocy et al., 2004). Besides high yields, decrease of FCR and decreased of protein content
in diets have also been observed. It (Avnimelech et al., 1994) was estimated that feed
utilization by tilapia is higher in BFT with a ration 20% less than conventional water exchange
system. Studying the effect of BFT in juvenile tilapia, the reference (Azim and Little, 2008)
showed no difference in fish growth/production between 35% and 24% CP fed tanks under
BFT, but both were higher than clear-water control without biofloc with 35% CP. Moreover,
it Crab et al. (2009) was investigated the effectiveness of BFT for maintaining good water
quality in over-wintering ponds for tilapia. The BFT emerge as an alternative to overcome
over-wintering problems, particularly mass mortality of fish due to low temperatures. In the
study (A vnimelech, 2007) was observed that biofloc consumed by fish (tilapia) may represent
a very significant feed source, constituting about 50% of the regular feed ration of fish
(assuming daily feeding of2% body weight). Using glucose or a combination of glycerol plus
Bacillus as a carbon source in bioreactors led to higher biofloc protein content, higher n-6
fatty acids, which resulted in improved survival rates.
2.10.3. Bioflocs on reproduction
Emerenciano et al. (2013) described the possibility of BFT in brood stock rearing tanks
considering its in-situ nutritive capability i.e., 24 hours a day. Bioflocs could be helped to
first stages of gonad formation and ovary development. It avoids the unstability of water
quality parameters, related to the conventional brooders rearing system. This opinion
coincides with the study of (Emerenciano et al., 2011 ). BFT is applied in the breeding ponds
The fact that there are no cases of fish escape to the environment, biological pollution is thus
prevented. Being more independent from the external environment due to increased levels of
control, BFT systems improved hygiene, disease risk management, lower feed quantity
supplied and thus overall cost of production (Summerfelt, 2006). However, the entire biofloc
process is completely dependent on the availability of sunlight (Azim and Asaeda, 2005) and
therefore maximum nitrogen uptake is limited to light sufficiency.
2.13. Disadvantages of biofloc technology:
The task of harvesting the periphyton 1s laborious making the application of the
periphyton treatment technique in the intensive aquaculture sector expensive. Nevertheless,
the technique may be significant in smaller extensive aquaculture systems in developing
countries. The biofloc technology is not yet fully predictable and can therefore be risky to
implement at farm level in developing countries (Crab et al., 2012). It is not easy to convince
farmers to implement the technique, since the concept of biofloc technology goes in against
common wisdom that water in the pond has to be clear (Avnimelech, 2009). Release of
polluted effluents from bioflocs also pause challenges as environmentalists are keen to prevent
such happenings. Some microbial community in the bioflocs may tum to cause diseases to
the cultured fish. The most challenging issue is the experience and technical knowledge
regarding management ofbiofloc technology and the economic benefits that goes with it.
2.14. Perspectives of BFT
Biosecurity is a priority in aquaculture industry. For example, in shrimp farming,
considerable impact of disease outbreaks during the past two decades greatly affected the
operational management of shrimp farms worldwide (Wasielesky et al., 2006). Infected PLs
and incoming water seem to be the main pathway for pathogen introduction. This scenario
forced farmers to look for more biosecure culture practices to minimize the risk associated
with exposure to pathogens (Browdy et al., 2001). Biofloc technology brings an obvious
advantage of minimizing consumption and release of water, recycling in situ nutrients and
organic matter. Furthermore, pathogens introduction is reduced, improving the farm
biosecurity. Biofloc technology will enable aquaculture grow towards an environmental
26
Materials and
Methods
3. Materials and methods
The present study on Comparative efficacy of biojloc and feed based Common carp
(Cyprinus carpio, L) production system with special reference to environmental health
production has been conducted in the Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fishery
Sciences, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Chakgaria,
Panchasayar, Kolkata-94, 22°28'46"N 88°24'4"E. The duration of the study lasted for a-
period of about three months from March to May, 2015.
3.1. Preparations of cistern
Ten outdoor experimental cylindrical cement tanks (180 L) were selected for the
present investigation. After thorough washing and sun drying the tanks were provided
with agriculture soil base of 15 cm. and then filled with ground water (pH-7.5). All the
tanks were manured with cowdung @ I 0,000 kg/ha as practiced in traditional pond
preparation for fish farming in the locality. The requisite amount of cow dung were mixed
with water in a bucket and dispensed in the form of slurry into the tanks. They were then
randomly grouped into two batches in triplicate for the three systems designed. All the
tanks were applied with lime @ 200 kg/ha after seven days of manure application and kept
undisturbed for another seven days. The water colour turned to bluish green and became
ready for stocking of fish.
3.2. Preparation of biofloc
Boiled rice (150 L) water mixed with molasses (3 kg) in a tub. After that, yeast
powder (250 g) and filtered freshwater (50 L) were added to the mixture and vigorously
mixed together to make a solution and also kept for 72 hours in open air for aerobic
fermentation. When the colour of solution tum to deep yellow the solution was transferred
to another tub. Finally the solution was ready to use as a medium of biofloc growth
enhancer.
3.3. Feeding
Fish in first and second batches of treatment tanks were fed with crumble feed (crude
protein: 35%) once daily between 9.00 a.m. to IO a.m. @6% (Tl), 3% (T2) of body weight
respectively along with biofloc medium @ 15 ml/tank. Fish in the third batch of tanks
(T3) were applied only with biofloc medium @ 15 ml/tank daily without the above
supplementary feed. Fish in the fourth batch of tanks (CI) were supplied only with the
above diet@ 6% of body weight but were not applied with biofloc medium. The last batch
of treatment tanks without fish were applied only with biofloc medium@ 15 ml/tank daily
acted as second control (C2). The required amount of feed was broadcasted over the water
surface in respective treatments (Tl, T2 and CI).
The biofloc medium was also broadcasted by using a measuring cylinder over the
water surface of respective treatments (Tl, T2, T3 and C2). The biofloc medium was
applied to the treatments once daily at early morning between 5.30 a.m. to 6 a.m. or late
afternoon between 5 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. up to 45 days of the investigation period.
3.4. Setting of aerator
To aerate all the treatments two electromagnetic air pump (35 Watt and 220 Volt each)
were used. Aeration was provided by using two pumice stone in each treatment. Peumice
stone was set above the 40 cm. of bottom surface. Aeration was continued for 12-14 hours
per day depending upon the daily weather condition.
3.5. Stocking of fish
Healthy fry of Common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) (Wt. 0.841 g) were collected from
faculty pond. Stocking of fish was done in the tanks @ 18 nos./tank. Two weeks after
application of cowdung when the colour of the water changes to greenish blue indicating
development of planktonic organisms. They were reared for 90 days.
3.6. Water replenishment
A fixed level of water was maintained in the experimental tanks by periodic addition
of ground water to compensate the losses due to evaporation and sampling.
3.7. Collection of water samples
Water samples were collected at 7 days interval from each of the tanks at a fixed hour
of the day (9.00 a.m.) by completely dipping the collection bottle at 15 cm depth for
physic-chemical analyses. During collection of water samples, cautions were taken so as
to prevent air bubbling, which might influence water parameters such as dissolved oxygen.
3.8. Collection of soil samples
Soil samples from each of the cisterns were collected from at 15 days interval from
the soil bed using own hand. They were then mixes, air dried, pulverized with pestle and
mortar and sieved through 150 µm mesh sieve and stored in labeled polythene packets for
analyses.
3.9. Collection of plankton
A conical plankton net made up of bolting silk cloth (no. 21 with 77 meshes per square
centimeter) was used to collect the plankton sample. About 2 L of water from each of the
cistern was collected from randomly selected locations with the help of a 500 ml beaker
and pooled together for filtering through plankton in 4% formalin solution and stored in
labeled vials for subsequent quantitative and qualitative analysis. Plankton samples are
collected at 20 days intervals.
3.10. Analysis of samples
3.10.1. Water quality
3.10.1.1. Temperature
The water temperature was measured using a centigrade thermometer on spot and
expressed as 0c.
3.10.1.2. pH
pH of water samples was estimated by a digital pH meter (Systronics-VI) on spot.
3.10.1.3. Dissolved oxygen
For estimation of dissolved oxygen content of water, the samples were collected with
all necessary precautions. Winkler's method was followed for the same (APHA, 1995).
3.10.1.4. Total Alkalinity
Estimation of total alkalinity of water samples were done immediately after
collection. Carbonate alkalinity of water samples were analyzed by titrating the samples
against N/50 H2S04 using phenolphthalein as indicator. Bicarbonate alkalinity was
determined against N/50 H2S04 using methyl orange indicator (APHA, 1995).
3.10.1.5. Total hardness
Total hardness of water samples was measured on the sampling day by titrating the
samples against EDT A (Ethylene Di-amine Tetra Acetic acid) after adding ammonia
buffer and Eriochrome Black T (APHA, 1995) as indicator.
3.10.1.6. Ammonia-nitrog en (NH3-N)
After proper filtration of the sample, phenol solution, sodium nitropruside solution
and oxidizing solution were added to the sample. The samples were then wrapped with
paper and kept at room temperature (22-27°C) in subdued light for at least 1 hour. A blue
colour appeared which was stable for 24 hrs. The ammonia concentration of the samples
was directly estimated through a double beam UV-vis-Spectrophotometer (CECIL CE-
4002) 640 run wavelengths (Wetzel and Likens, 1991).
3.10.1.7. Nitrate-nitrogen (N03-N)
After proper filtration of the samples, 1(N) hydrochloric acid was added to each of
the sample and after 10 minutes nitrate nitrogen concentration was directly estimated
through a double beam UV-vis-Spectrophotometer (CECIL CE-4002) at 220 and 275 run
wavelengths (APHA, 1995).
Absolute weight gain= (Final wet body weight- Initial wet body weight)
Body weight gain(%) = (Final body weight - Initial body weight) x 100
Initial body weight
Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) = {Total dry feed fed in gm I Fish weight gain in gm.)
Mortality rate (%) = (Initial no. of fish - Final no. of fish) x 100
Initial number of fish
EXPERIMENTAL
PROTOCOL
ANALYSES
Specific growth
Physico-chemical analyses rate
pH
Temperature
Orthophosphate BOD 1
Percentage distribution of Phytoplankton Percentage distribution of Zooplankton
Statistical Analyses
37
36
35
.-..
~ 34
'-'
~ 33
.; 32
~
I-
~ 31
E
~
30
~
29
28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
4.1.1.1.2. pH
pH of water in any treatment declined up to week 4 followed by gradual increase up
to week 9-10 after which it declined again except in T3 and C2 (Fig. 3 ). Range of variation
in water pH was highest in T2 (7.29 to 8.2) and lowest in Tl (7.1 to 7.64). Difference
among the treatments exhibits strong significance (F = 11.57; P < 0.01) during the
investigation period.
7.8
7.6
:c
Q.
7.4
7.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
10
9.5
9
:::-' 8.5
.:..
t=.11
8
._..
=
O 7.5
Q
7
6.5
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
4.1.1.1.4. Hardness
Hardness of water declined sharply almost up to the first half of investigation in all
the systems including control after which in exhibited two minor peaks during week 7 and
11 respectively (Fig. 5). The overall mean value was highest in Tl (375.57 mg 1- 1)
followed by C2 (348.50 mg 1-1), T2 (329.29 mg 1- 1), Cl (326.86 mg J- 1) and lowest in T3
(319.43 mg J-1). Overall treatment difference exhibited significant (F = 7.85; P < 0.01) .
700
---Tl ~ T2 ---T3 -+--- Cl - C2
600
~ 500
E
'-'
"'~
c 400
"Cl
i..
~
:C 300
200.!---.---,~-r---.--.::~- r----r---,r---r----r-~~~~
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
_._ Tl ~ T2 ---T3 - CI - C2
150
£' 140
~
E 130
'-'
.f'
.!: 120
]
< 110
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
36
'R,esuffJ ant!1Jiscusrion
r
'-'
o.09
u
~ 0.08
..c
Q.
rll
Q
,g_ 0.07
I
Q
..c
..c 0.06
t::
0
0.05 +----.----.--... --~---.--.----- -,.-....-----,--- ......,....--,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
Fig. 7. Temporal changes of ortho-phosph ate concentratio n of water in different
treatments employed.
(0.18 mg. 1- 1). Analysis of variance indicated strong significance among the treatments
during the investigation period (F = 16.64; P < 0.001).
0.35
---Tl --B-T2-6-T3-Ct - C 2
0.3
--'
~ 0.25
'-'
z
ci' 0.2
z
0.15
4.1.1.2.4. Nitrite-Nitrogen
Nitrite-nitrogen was conspicuous either by absence or representing with very low
concentration during the period of study in any of the treatments employed (Fig. I 0). The
average value of nitrite-N did not differ much among the treatments employed (0.02-0.025
mgJ- 1). Difference among the treatments remained insignificant (P > 0.05).
0.06 ---Tl --&-T2 ..........,_ T3 - Ct - - C2
0.05
£t)II
0.04
e
'-'
0.03
z I
0"' 0.02
z
0.01
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Weeks
stationary during most part of the investigation period except in T 1 and T2 where an
increasing trend was observed during the later phase (Fig. 11 ). The overall mean value of
BOD 1 was highest in Tl (3.54 mgJ-1), followed closely either by T2 (2.97 mgJ- 1) or Cl
(2.74 mgJ- 1) and lowest in C2 (2.35 mgJ- 1). Overall difference among the treatments
exhibited strong significance (F = 15.40; P < 0.001).
s.s -e--Tt -a-T2 ---+-TJ ~Cl -C2
4.5
,-...
..i..
bf) 3.5
e
.._,
0.- 2.5
0
CCI
1.5
::;-- 250
;.,....
= 200
..."O
e
U 150
.._,
bf)
i:i..
Q.,
100
~
so
0
1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
40
'R,suftr anti1Jiscurrion
20 40 Days 60 80
!2 MYXO liCHLORO !fiZYGNE •BACI 9:XAN ;EUG ".J MYXO !llCHLORO ::!ZYGNE •BACI ~ XAN .: EUG
cl00% 100%
-
.s
..6 80% -=
c
.Sl
80%
-
·c:
-~
"O
.-
60%
..Q
·c:
....
-~
"Cl
,-.,
60%
-;!. 0~
-;:: 40% 40%
c
41
....c
'-
...u
:_ 20%
41
...u 20o/.
41
~
0% 0%
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
0 ays Days
~
OMYXO UCHLORO rl ZYGNE r:l MYXO II CHLO RO r, ZYGNE • BACJ '2i XAN :J EUG
c 100% 100%
-
.i:
_s 80% -=
c
.Sl
80%
-
..Q
·c:
-
·c:
-~
:e;"'
.-
~
60%
--
"O
0~
._,
60%
-...
._,
0
40% 40%
c4,1 c
41
u ...
u
41 20%
4,1 20% ~
~
0% 0%
20 40nays 60 80 20 40 60 80
0 ays
-=
i::
.i: 80%
-~-
.Q
·c:
60%
..-
"O
~
._, 40%
-
c
4,1
...
I.I 20%
4,1
~
0%
20 40 Days60 80
~
Fig. 16. Percent(%) distribution of phytoplankton in different treatment
employed.
42
~suffs and'[}jsr,urrion
4.1.1.4.2. Zooplankton
4.1.1.4.2.1. Total Zooplankton
Total zooplankton community was represented by the members of rotifers (Keratella
sp., Brachionus sp.), copepods (Cyclops sp.), cladocerans (Daphnia sp., Moina sp.) and
ostracods. The population increased sharply up to day 40-50 in any of the treatments
followed by a decline except in C2 (Fig. 17). The overall mean value was highest in Tl
(557.5 nos. 1- 1) followed by T2 (481.25 nos. i-1}, Cl (452.5 nos. J-1), C2 (435 nos. 1- 1) and
lowest in T3 (377.5 nos. 1-1). Difference among the treatments remained significant (F =
4.06; P < 0.05).
£ 700
.,;
-=g
0
600
,:!.! 500
=~
g. 400
0
N
] 300
0
r""'
200+-~~~~--.~~~~~---~~~~~
20 40 60 80
Days
!l ROTI • COPE =CLADO -:, OSTRA II ROTI • COPE la! CLADO : : OSTRA
100%
c 100%
-=
i:
-
.s
j 80%
.s
80%
-
·c
~ 60%
-"Cl
.-..
-
.c
·c
:a"'
.-..
60%
t'-"' 40%
-i:
~ 20%
~
-
Q
'-"'
i:
11,l
u
....
40%
20%
l 11,l
Q..
0%
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
Days Days
100%
-
.s
=
i:
-=
c
.s 80%
-
.c
·c
:a.-.."'
t'-"'
60% -
.c
·c
:a.-.."'
~
60%
- i:
11,l
~
40%
20%
-
,_. 40%
Q
c
11,l
u
.... 20%
~ 11,l
Q..
0% 0%
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
Days Days
-
c4o%
i:
11,l
~
11,l
20%
Q..
0%
20 40 60 80
Days
highest in Tl (6792.5 nos. 1- 1) followed by T2 (5516.25 nos.1- 1), Cl (5393.75 nos.1- 1), T3
(5088.75 nos. 1- 1) and lowest in C2 (3376.75 nos. 1- 1). Difference among the treatments
remained significant (F = 43.29; P < 0.001).
7.8
-·=
Cl.
7.6
c5
rJ) 7.4
7.2
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
r
'-'
2.3
_g= 2.1
..
"u
.~ 1.9
=
"
Qi,
::; 1.7
·-r.,;s 1.5 -+---.--....-- -.---.--.----r --..---.---.,- ----.-----
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
Fig. 21. Temporal changes of organic carbon of soil in different treatments employed.
=s" 0.2
r.,;
0.18 +---,--..--,- ---,--r-~-~- -.--..--~--,. ...----..--,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
---=-
8
t:lfl
6
t:lfl
"ii
~ 4
.....
"C
Q
i:=
2
0
0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Days
Fig. 23. Temporal trend in growth of common carp in different treatments employed.
4.1.3.2. Body weight gain(%)
Temporal trend of weight gam (%) declined sharply as the period of rearing
progressed (Fig. 24). The average value was highest in Tl (54.47%) followed by Cl
(50.15%), T2 (43.88%) and lowest in T3 (27.73%).
140 ---Tl --a-n -T3 -Cl
120
100
=
·; 80
t:lfl
i 60
.....
"g 40
.J:J
~ 20
0
15 30 45 60 75 90
Days
Fig. 24. Temporal trend in body weight gain (%) of common carp in different
treatments employed.
47
'R,§suflr and 1JiJcusrion
15
0 +-~~---.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--,
15 30 45 Days 60 75 90
Fig. 25. Temporal trend in specific growth rate (%) of common carp in different
treatments employed.
2
Tl T2 T3 Cl
Treatments
4.2. Discussion
Absolute weight gain of the test fish (Cyprinus carpio L.) decreased polynomially (y
= -0.562 x2 +0.745x+8.255; R2 = 0.991) (Fig. 27) from Tl to T3 either with decreasing
ration size from 6% to 3% or with and without biofloc supplementation. Therefore, it was
established that both the rate of feed application and biofloc exerted a definite role in
growth of the test fish .
-~
.c 5
-~
~
4
~
-
0
Ill
:I
3
2
"'
.c
< 1
0
Tl Cl T2 T3
Treatments
Fig. 27. Modular trend in absolute weight gain in different treatments employed.
Moreover, such intensity of impact upon growth of the fish was extremely discernible
among the treatments where in presence of biofloc, feed application @ 6% body weight
(Tl) resulted in absolute weight gain nearly by an order of magnitude (Fig. 28) against
6.07 times in T2 (@ 3% feed). However, comparing an iso-nutrient regime in Tl and Cl
effect of biofloc in increasing the absolute weight gain was only 6.42% in Tl. Again,
biofloc alone in T3 resulted only in 2.79 times absolute weight gain against 9.27 times
with only feed@ 6% body weight. Therefore, biofloc alone was not sufficient enough for
the comparable growth of the test fish under supplementary feeding regime.
,__ 1000
..
~
'-'
c: 800 ·
·;
-
-~
~
.c 600
~
400
-
0
"'
.c
~
Ill
:I
200
< 0
Tl Cl T2 T3
Treatments
Fig. 28. Absolute weight gain (%) of fish in different treatments employed.
This was further supported by the fact that mortality of the test fish was also highest
(33.33%) in the biofloc alone treatment (T3) and such rate declined by a modular pattern
(y = 30.68x-0 ·60 ; R2 = 0.892) either with feeding support alone or both with feeding and
biofloc support (Fig. 29).
-QI
f 25
....
;<,::
-;
t: 20
0
~
15
10
T3 T2 Cl Tl
Treatments
Fig. 29. Modular trend in mortality rate of fish in different treatments employed.
However, presence of biofloc improved the FCR both in Tl (2.09) and T2 (1.75)
against C 1 (2.31 ). Therefore, in spite of decrease in absolute weight gain in T2 because of
the most favourable FCR (Fig. 30) and less nutrient loading the system was proved to the
economically and ecologically more supportive. This was further corroborated by the fact
that FCE (%) (Fig. 31) decreased polynomially (y = 2.288 x2-16.04x+70.81 R2 = 1) with
an identical reverse trend in FCR with identical fit (y = -0.057X2+0.506x+ 1.302; R2 = I).
Under biofloc supported culture system reduction of feed amount by 50% in T2 resulted in
concomitant reduction of growth of the test fish by 38.42% compared to Tl (Fig. 30). So,
it was clear that biofloc improved the performance of the supplementary feed both in terms
FCR and FCE.
2.4
2.3 y = -0.057x 2 + 0.5069x + 1.3027
R2 = 1
2.2
2.1
a:
U 2
~
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
T2 Tl Cl
Treatments
60
40
T2 Tl Cl
Treatments
5 y = 1. 7365e0.0033x
R2 = 0.7101
4.5 •
4
:::--
.I..
bJ) 3.5
e •
-
'-"'
Q
0
3
= 2.5
2 •
1.5
50 100 150 200 250 300
NPP
Fig. 32. Relationship between BOD1 and NPP in different biofloc treatments.
52
'/qsuffs and'[);:,ccmion
Fig. 33. Relation ship between total plankton and NPP in different biofloc treatmen ts
Both GPP, NPP and absolute weight gain were highest in T 1 indicated that biofloc
not only directly supported the test fish as a valuable source of nutrition but supported the
phytoplanktonic community and photosynthesis as well. Therefore, the heterotrophic
components within the system in tum supported mineralization to provide more nutrients
for the phytoplankton who in return supplied the carbon as energy source to the former.
As a result a dynamic complementary process in between the autotrophs and the
heterotrophs was developed. Several studies (Wang & Priscu, 1994; Kamjunke et al.,
1997; Duvall et al., 2001; Brett et al., 1999) confirmed the importance of autotrophic
production in supporting the heterotrophic pathway in manure and feed based culture
systems.
Though, there was high fluctuation ofpH of soil particularly in Tl, T2 and Cl during
the first half of study, it remained always alkaline. Moreover, in general, the higher
presence of organic carbon of soil in biofloc treatments (Fig. 21) might have been resulted
in comparatively higher concentration of available phosphorus in soil of the above
treatments. Therefore, biofloc not only impacted the water quality and growth of the test
fish but also favoured the phosphate mineralization in the soil phase.
From the Results and Discussion chapter of this thesis on Comparative efficacy of
biofloc and feed based Common carp (Cyprinus carpio, L.) production system with
special reference to environmenta l health, the following findings are summarized
herein:
1. It was established that both the rate of feed application and biofloc exerted a definite
role in growth of the test fish (Cyprinus carpio L.). However, biofloc alone was not
sufficient enough for the comparable growth of the test fish under supplementary
feeding regime.
2. Biofloc alone resulted only in 2.79 times absolute weight gain against 9.27 times with
only feed @ 6% body weight/day.
3. Absolute weight gain of Cyprinus carpio L. decreased polynomially (y = -0.562 x2
+0.745x+8.255; R2 = 0.991) (Fig. 26) either with decreasing ration size from 6% to
3% or with and without biofloc supplementation.
4. In presence of biofloc, feed application @ 6% body weight/day resulted in absolute
weight gain nearly by an order of magnitude against 6.07 times in feeding@3% body
weight/day.
5. Comparing an iso-nutrient regime (@ 6% body weight/day), effect of biofloc in
increasing the absolute weight gain was only 6.42%.
6. Mortality of the test fish was highest (33.33%) in the biofloc only treatment and it
declined by a modular pattern (y= 30.68x·0 ·60 ; R2= 0.892) either with feeding support
alone or both with feeding and biofloc support (Fig. 28).
7. Presence ofbiofloc improved the FCR both in Tl (2.09) and T2 (1.75) against control
(2.31 ).
8. In spite of less absolute weight gain with feeding @ 3% body weight/day compared
to feeding @ 6% body weight/day, because of the most favourable FCR and less
nutrient loading, the system was proved to the economically and ecologically more
sustainable in presence of bioflocs.
9. Under biofloc supported culture system reduction of feed amount by 50% in resulted
in concomitant reduction of growth of the test fish by 38.42%. So, it was clear that
54
Summary anlConclusion
biofloc improved the performance of the supplementary feed both in terms FCR and
FCE.
10. Increase in the concentration of all the major nutrients like ortho-phosphate, ammonia-
nitrogen and nitrate-nitrogen in the feed supplemented treatments was because of the
uneaten feed and metabolic by-products as well.
11. The increase of nitrogen and phosphorus was subsequently manifested in higher
growth of fish in the biofloc treated systems as nitrogen mobilization in presence of
suitable carbon reserve in bioflloc was effected in microbial protein synthesis.
12. Higher presence of nutrients in the treatment with biofloc with fish compared to its
counterpart without fish was because of the bioturbation effect of the test fish.
13. The increase in BOD1 was concomitant with the NPP (y = l.7365e 0 ·0033 x; R2 = 0.71)
as well as total planktonic load (y = -243.6x2 + 2571.7x- 64.544; R2 = 0.64) in any
treatment indicated that phytoplanktonic load and resultant primary production was
operative in increasing the BOD1 particularly in biofloc treatments and with increasing
feed load from 3% to 6% of body weight.
14. Biofloc not only directly supported the test fish as a valuable source of nutrition but
supported the phytoplanktonic community and photosynthesis as well.
15. The abundance in planktonic community in terms of relative contribution of
myxophyceae and rotifer community in the biofloc treatments with feed
supplementation particularly in feeding @ 6% body weight/day indicated organic
loading and therefore, was inferior in terms of ecological health compared to the
treatment in which the rate of feed application was reduced to half.
16. The higher presence of organic carbon of soil in biofloc treatments might have been
resulted in comparatively higher concentration of available phosphorus in soil of the
above treatments.
17. Therefore, biofloc not only impacted the water quality and growth of the test fish but
also favoured the phosphate mineralization in the soil phase.
As the present study on Comparative efficacy of hiojloc and feed based Common carp
(Cyprinus carpio, L.) production system with special reference to environmental health
was short term and time bound, it was inherent with so many limitations. Several aspects
viz. community composition of the bioflocs particularly with particular reference to the
heterotrophs, periodic qualitative and quantitative estimation of bioflocs within the culture
tanks with special reference to nutritional value, estimation of heterotrophic production and
mineralization of organic residues under biofloc treated systems etc. could not be addressed
because of the limitations of time and infrastructural facilities. Therefore, such study should
be continued further with long term basis plugging such loop holes in planning and
designing so as to get a time series data for ultimate validation of the results. Moreover,
comparative studies with variable media compositions in the light of the several media being
used in shrimp culture sectors, variable test fish and with variable feeding regimes under
different levels of crude proteins and feeding rate should be addressed by the future
researchers. This is because, as biofloc has been proved to be effective in reducing the
artificial feed of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) by 50% with concomitant improvement
in environmental health of the culture system through reduced organic loading, this
technology has a tremendous scope for the culture of omnivorous fin fishes.
56
!Bibliography
7. Bibliography
Acierno, R. and Zonno, V. (2010). In: Aquaculture waste management: Water filtration
and sludge thickening, edited by Kurup, B.M., Harikrishanan, M. and Prajith, K.K.,
W AMAFISH 2010 - Indo European workshop on Waste Management in
Aquaculture and Fisheries, School of Industrial Fisheries, Cochin University of
Science and Technology, Cochin, India. pp. 53.
Anon, 1983. First 138 case studies of composite fish culture in India. Central Inland
Fisheries Research Institute. 23: 153.
Apud, F.D., Primavera, J.H. and Torres, P.L. (1983). Farming of Prawns and Shrimps.
Extension Manual (5), SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department, Iloilo, Philippines. pp.
67.
APHA (American Public Health Association), (1995). In: Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health
Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control
Federation, Washington, pp. 1040.
AQUACOP, (1975). Maturation and spawning in captivity of penaeid shrimp: Penaeus
merguiencis De man, Penaeus japonicas, Bale, Penaeus azteus, Metapenaensis de
Haan, and Penaeus semisulcatus de Haan, In: Proceedings of the sixth annual
meeting of world mariculture society, edited by A vault, W. and Miller, R., pp. 123-
129. Lousiano state University, Baton, Rouge.
AQUACOP, Le Moullac, G. and Damez, D. (1991 ). Modelisation de la resistance au chocs
de salinite des postlarves de Penaeus vannamei. Aquatic Living Resources, 4: 169-
173.
Arnold, S.J., Coman, F.E., Jackson, C.J. and Groves, S.A. (2009). High-intensity, zero
water exchange production of juvenile tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon: An
evaluation of artificial substrates and stocking density. Aquaculture, 293: 42-48.
Asaduzzaman, M., Wahab, M.A., Verdegem, M.C.J., Huque, S., Salam, M.A. and Azim,
M.E. (2008). C/N ratio control and substrate addition for periphyton development
jointly enhance freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii production in ponds.
Aquaculture, 280: 117-123.
Ill
Breithaupt, D.E. (2004). Identification and quantification of Astaxanthin esters in shrimp
(Panda/us borealis) and in a microalgae (Haematococcus pluvidis) by liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry usmg negative ion atmospheric
pressure chemical ionization. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry, 52: 3870-
3875.
Brett, M.T., Luhnow, F.S., Villar-Argaiz, M., Muller-Solger, A. and Goldman, C.R.
(1999). Nutrient control of bacterioplankton and phytoplankton dynamics.
Aquatic Ecology, 33: 1-1.
Briggs, M.R.P. and Funge-Smith, S.J. (1994). A nutrient budget of some intensive marine
shrimp ponds in Thailand. Aquaculture and fish management, 25: 789-811.
Browdy, C.L., Bratvold, D., Stokes, A.D. and Mcintosh, R.P. (2001). Perspectives on the
application of closed shrimp culture systems. In: The new Wave, Proceedingsof
the Special Session on Sustainable Shrimp Culture: A tutorial, edited by Jory,
E.D, Browdy, C.L., Journal of The World Aquaculture Society, pp. 20-34., Baton
Rouge, LA, USA.
Burford, M.A., Thompson, P .J ., Macintosh, R.P ., Bauman, R.H. and Pearson, D.C. (2003 ).
Nutrient and microbial dynamics in high intensity zero exchange shrimp ponds in
Belize. Aquaculture, 219: 393-41 l.
Burford, M.A, Thompson, P.J., Mcintosh, R.P., Bauman, R.H. and Pearson, D.C. (2004).
The contribution of flocculated material to shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
nutrition in a high intensity, zero-exchange system. Aquaculture, 232: 525-537.
Chaignon, V., Lartiges, B.S., El Samrani, A. and Mustin, C. (2002). Evolution of size
distribution and transfer of mineral particles between floes in activated sludges: an
insight into floe exchange dynamics. Water Research. 36 (3): 676-684.
Chemberlain, G. W. and Hopkins, S .J. (1994). Reducing water use and feed cost in intensive
ponds. Journal of The World Aquaculture Society, 25: 29-32.
Chu, C.P. and Lee, DJ. (2004). Multiscale structures of biological floes. Chemical
Engineering Science, 59: 1875-1883.
Cohen, J., Samocha, T.M., Fox, J.M., Gandy, R.L. and Lawrence, A.L. (2005).
Characterization of water quality factors during intensive raceway production of
juvenile L. vannamei using limited discharge and biosecure management tools.
Aquaculture Engineering, 32: 425-442.
IV
Connor, W.E. (2000). Importance of n-3 fatty acids in health and disease. The American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71: 171 S-175S.
Crab, R., Avnimelech, Y., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P. and Versitrate, W. (2007). Nitrogen
removal techniques in aquaculture for a sustainable production. Aquaculture. 270:
1-14.
Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P. and Verstraete, W. (2012). Biofloc technology in
aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture, 351(6): 356-
357.
Crab, R., Kochva, M., Verstraete, W. and Avnimelech, Y. (2009). Bio-floes technology
application in over-wintering of tilapia. Aquaculture Engineering, 40: 105-112.
Crab, R. (2010). Bioflocs technology: an integrated system for the removal of nutrients
and simultaneous production of feed in aquaculture. PhD thesis, Ghent University,
pp.178.
Crab, R., Boon, N., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P. and Verstraete, W. (2010a). Different organic
carbon sources shape the nutritional properties and the microbial community
composition of bioflocs. Aquaculture, Submitted.
Craggs, R.J., Adey, W.H., Jessup, B.K. and Oswald, W.J. (1996). A controlled stream
mesocosm for tertiary treatment of sewage. Ecological Engineering, 6: 149-169.
Craig, S. and Helfrich, L.A. (2002). Understanding Fish Nutrition, Feeds and Feeding.
Virginia Cooperative Extension, Yorktown (Virginia), pp. 4. (Publication, 420-
256).
De Barros, H.P. and Valenti, W.C. (2003). Food intake of Macrobrachium rosenbergii
during larval development. Aquaculture, 216(1-4): 165-176.
De Deckere, E., Korver, 0., Verschuren, P.M. and Katan, M.B. (1998). Health aspects of
fish and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids from plant and marine origin. European
Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 52: 749-753.
DAHDF, (2014-2015). Handbook on Fisheries Statistics 2011. Department of Animal
Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India. New
Delhi.
De Schryver, P., Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Boon, N. and Verstraete, W. (2008). The basics of
bio-flocs technology: the added value for aquaculture. Aquaculture, 277: 125-137.
De Schryver, P. (2010). Poly-P- Hydroxy butyrate as a microbial agent in Aquaculture.
Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University, Belgium.
VI
Dulic, Z., Mitrovic-Tutundzic, V., Markovic, Z. and Zivic, I. (2006). Monitoring water
quality using zooplankton organisms as bioindicators at the Dubica fish farm,
Serbia. Archives of Biological Sciences Journal, 58: 245-248.
Duvall, R.J., Anderson, L.J.W. and Goldman, C.R. (2001). Pond enclosure evaluations of
microbial products and chemical algicides used in lake management. Journal of
Aquatic Plant Management, 39: 9-106.
Ebeling, J.M., Timmons, M.B. and Bisogru, J.J. (2006). Engineering analysis of the
stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of
ammonia-nitrogen in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 257: 346-58.
Etling, E.H., Kamstra, A., Verreth, J.A.J., Huisman, E.A. and Klapwijk, A. (2006). Design
and operation of nitrifying trickling filters in recirculating aquaculture: a review.
Aquaculture Engineering, 34: 234-260.
Emerenciano, M., Ballester, E.L.C., Cavalli, R.O. and Wasielesky, W. (201 lb). Effect of
biofloc technology (BFT) on the early postlarval stage of pink shrimp
Farfantepenaeus paulensis: growth performance, floe composition and salinity
stress tolerance. Aquaculture International, 19: 891-901.
Emerenciano, M., Ballester, E.L.C., Cavalli, R.O. and Wasielesky, W. (2012). Biofloc
technology application as a food source in a limited water exchange nursery system
for pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817). Aquaculture
Research, 43: 447-457.
Emerenciano, M., Vinatea, L., Galvez, A.G., Shuler, A., Stokes, A., Venero, J., Haveman,
J ., Richardson, J ., Thomas, B. and Leffler, J. (2009). Effect of two different
diets fish meal based and "organic" plant based diets in Litopenaeus setiferus
earlier post-larvae culture under biofloc, green-water and clear-water
conditions. CD of abstracts ofJournal of The World Aquaculture Society, Meeting
2009, Veracruz, Mexico.
Emerenciano, M.G.C., Wasielesky, W., Soares, R.B., Ballester, E.C., Cavalli, R.O. and
Izeppi, E.M. (2007). Crescimento e sobrevivecia do camarao-rosa
Farfantepenaeus paulensis na fase de ben;;ario em meio heterotr6fico. Acta
Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, 29: 1-7.
Emerenciano, M., Avnimelech, Y., Gonzalez, R., Leon, A.T.D., Cuzon, G. and Gaxiola,
G. (2009). Effect of bio-floc technology (BFT) in ectoparasite control in Nile
FAO, 2010. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and agriculture
organization of the United Nations. Rome.
FAO, 2012. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and agriculture
organization of the United Nations. Rome.
FAO, 2014. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and agriculture
organization of the United Nations. Rome.
Felix, N. and Sudharsan, M. (2004). Effect of glycine betaine, a feed attractant affecting
growth and feed conversion of juvenile freshwater prawn Macrobrachium
rosenbergii. Aquaculture Nutrition, 10: 193-197.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO (2008). Cultured
aquaculture species information programme, Penaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931 ).
Available at http://www.fao.org
Fournier, V. Gouillou-Coustans, M. F., Metailler, R., Vachot, C., Moriceau, J., Le Delliou,
H., Huelvan, C., Desbruyeres, E. and Kaushik, S. J. (2003). Excess dietary
arginine affects urea excretion but does not improve N utilization in rainbow trout
Oncorhynchus mykiss and turbot Psetta maxima. Aquaculture, 217: 559-576.
Garatun-Tjeldsto, 0., Ottera, H., Julshamn, K. and Austreng, E. (2006). Food ingestion in
juvenile cod estimated by inert lanthanide markers-effects of food particle size.
ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63(2): 311-319 .
Jana, B.B., Chakrabarty, P., Biswas, J.K. and Ganguly, S. (2001). Biogeochemical cycling
bacteria as indices of pond fertilization: Importance of CNP ratios of input fertilizers.
Journal ofApplied Microbiology, 90(5): 733-740.
Jana, B.B. and Das, S.K. (1992). Bioturbation induced changes of fertilizer value of
phosphate rock in relation to alkaline phosphatase activity. Aquaculture, 103: 321-
330.
Jhingran, V.G. (1985). In: Fish and fisheries ofIndia. Hindustan Publishing Corporation,
Delhi, India.
Joadder, M. (2006). Food and feeding habits of Ganga foussoufis from the river padman
in Rajshahi University, 25: 69-71.
Johnson, C.N., Barnes, S., Ogle, J., Grimes, D.J., Chang, Y.J., Peacock, A.O. and Kline,
L. (2008). Microbial community analysis of water, foregut, and hindgut during
growth of Pacific White Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in closed-system
aquaculture. Journal of The World Aquaculture Society, 39(2): 251-8.
Ju, Z.Y., Forster, I., Conquest, L. and Dominy, W. (2008). Enhanced growth effects on
shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) from inclusion of whole shrimp floe or floe
fractions to a formulated diet. Aquaculture Nutrition, 14: 533-543.
Ju, Z.Y., Forster, LP. and Dominy, W.G. (2009) Effects of supplementing two species of
marine algae or their fractions to a formulated diet on growth, survival and
composition of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquaculture, 292: 237-43.
Kamjunke, N., Boing, W. and Voigt, H. (1997). Bacterial and primary production under
hypertrophic conditions. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 13: 29-35.
x
Krummenauer, D., Peixoto, S., Cavalli, R.O., Poersch, L.H. and Wasielesky, W. (2011).
Super intensive culture of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in a biofloc
technology system in southern Brazil at different stocking densities. Journal of The
World Aquaculture Society, 42: 726-733.
Kuhn, D.D., Boardman, G.D., Lawrence, A.L., Marsh, L. and Flick, G.J. (2009). Microbial
floes generated in bioreactors is a superior replacement ingredient for fishmeal or
soybean meal in shrimp feed. Aquaculture, 296: 51-57.
Kuhn, D.D. and Lawrence, A. (2012). Ex-situ biofloc technology. In: Biofloc Technology-
a practical guide book, 2nd edn., edited by Avnimelech, Y., pp. 217-230, Journal of
The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Kuhn, D.D., Lawrence, A.L., Boardman, G.D., Patnaik, S., Marsh, L. and Flick, G.J.
(2010). Evaluation of two types of bioflocs derived from biological treatment of
fish effluent as feed ingredients for Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei.
Aquaculture, 303: 28-33.
Kuhn, D.D., Addison, L., Gregory, L., Boardman, D., Patnaik, S., Marsh, L., George, J.
and Flick, Jr.A. (2010). Evaluation of two types ofbioflocs derived from biological
treatment of fish effluent as feed ingredients for pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus
vannamei. Aquaculture, 303: 28-33.
Kump, B.M. (201 Ob). Biofloc technology - The built in bioreactors for conversion of waste
into value added products in aquafarms. In: Inda European workshop on Wast
Management in Aquaculture and Fisheries, School of Industrial Fisheries, edited
by Kurup, B.M., Harikrishanan, M., Prajith, K.K ., WAMAFISH 2010, Cochin
University of Science and Technology, Cochin, India. P.S3.
Landman, M.J., Van Den Heuvel, M.R. and Ling, N. (2005). Relative sensitivities of
common freshwater fish and invertebrates to acute hypoxia. N. Z. Journal of
Marine and Freshwater research, 39 (5): 1061- 1067.
Lezama-Cervantes, C. and Paniagua-Michel, J. (2010). Effects of constructed microbial
mats on water quality and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei post-larvae.
Aquaculture Engineering, 42: 75-81.
Liu, Y. and Fang, H.H.P. (2003). Influences of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS)
on flocculation, settling, and dewatering of activated sludge. Critical. Reviews in
Environmental Science and Technology, 33(3): 237-273 .
Natarajan, A.V. and Pathak, V. (1983). Pattern of energy flow in freshwater tropical and
sub- tropical impoundments. CIFRI, ICAR, Bull No- 36, Barrackpore, West
Bengal, pp. 1-27.
XII
Naylor, R.L., Goldburg, R.J., Primavera, J.H., Kautsk, N., Beveridge, M.C.M., Clay, J.,
Folke C., Lubchencoi, J ., Mooney, H. and Troell, M. (2000). Effect of aquaculture
on world fish supplies. Nature, 405: 1017-1024.
Naylor, R.L., Hardy, R.W., Bureau, D.P., Chiu, A., Elliott, M., Farrell, A.P., Forster, I.,
Gatlin, D.M., Goldburg, R.J ., Hua, K. and Nichols, P .D. (2009). Feeding
aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proceedings ofthe National Acadamy and
Scinces, USA, 106: 15103-15110.
Oehmen, A., Yuan, Z., Blackall, L.L. and Keller, J. (2004). Short-term effects of carbon
source on the competition of polyphosphate accumulating organisms and glycogen
accumulating organisms. Water Science and Technology, 50(10): 139-
144.
Olsen, S.R., Cola, C.V., Wetanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.S. (1954). Estimation of available
phosphorus in soils by extractions with sodium bicarbonate. U. S. Dept., Journal
ofAdvances in Agriculture, pp. 939.
Parker, D.S., Asce: A.M., Kaufman, W.J. and Jenkins, D. (1972). Floe breakup in turbulent
flocculation processes. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE 98
(NSAl), 79.
Peron, G., Mittaine, J.F. and Le Gallic, B. (2010). Where do fishmeal and fish oil products
come from? An analysis of the conversion ratios in the global fishmeal industry.
Marine Policy, 34: 815-820.
Piedrahita, R.H. (2003). Reducing the potential environmental impact of tank aquaculture
effluents through intensification and recirculation. Aquaculture, 226(1-4): 35-44.
Pillay, T.V.R. (1992). In: Aquaculture and the environment. Fishing New Books, Oxford,
England.
Pillai, N.G.K. and Kaitha, P.K. (2004). Evolution of fisheries and aquaculture in India.
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, India, pp. 240.
Rakocy, J.E., Bailey, D.S., Thoman, E.S. and Shultz, R.C. (2004). Intensive tank culture
of tilapia with a suspended bacterial based treatment process: new dimensions in
Ray, A.J., Shuler, A.J., Leffler, J.W. and Browdy, C.L. (2009). Microbial ecology and
management ofbiofloc systems. pp. 255-266. In: The Rising Tide: Proceedings of
the Special Session on Sustainable Shrimp Farming, edited by Browdy, C.L.
and Jory, D.E., Journal of The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, LA.
Ray, A.J., Lewis, B.L., Browdy, C.L. and Leffler, J.W. (2010). Suspended solids removal
to improve shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production and an evaluation of a
plant-based feed in minimal-exchange, super intensive culture systems.
Aquaculture, 299: 89-98.
Ray, A.J., Seaborn, G., Leffler, J.W., Wilde, S.B., Lawson, A. and Browdy, C.L. (2010).
Characterization of microbial communities in minimal-exchange, intensive
aquaculture systems and the effects of suspended solids management.
Aquaculture, 310: 130-138.
Ricke, S.C. (2003). Perspectives on the use of organic acids and short chain fatty acids as
antimicrobials. Poultry Science, 82: 632-639.
Royce, W.F. (1972). Introduction to the Fishery Science. Academic Press, New York.
Russel, J. B. (1992). Another explanation for the toxicity of fermentation acids at low pH:
anion accumulation versus uncoupling. Journal ofApplied Bacteriology, 73: 363-
370.
Ruxton, C.H.S., Calder, P.C., Reed, S.C. and Simpson, M.J.A. (2005). The impact oflong-
chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on human health. Nutrition Research Review.
18: 113-129.
Salehizadeh, H. and Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. (2004). Production of
polyhydroxyalkanoates by mixed culture: recent trends and biotechnological
importance. Biotechnology Advances, 22(3): 261-279.
Samocha, T.M., Patnaik, S., Speed, M., Ali, A.M., Burger, J.M., Almeida, R.V., Ayub, Z.,
Harisanto, M., Horowitz, A. and Brock, D.L. (2007). Use of molasses as carbon
source in limited discharge nursery and grow-out systems for Litopenaeus
vannamei. Aquaculture Engineering, 36: 184-191.
Samocha, T.M., Patnaik S. and Gandy R.L. (2004). Heterotrophic intensification of pond
shrimp production. Book of abstract of Fifth International Conference on
Recirculating Aquaculture, July 2004, Roanoke, Virginia, USA, pp. 22-25 .
xv
Spicer, P.T. and Pratsinis, S.E. (1996). Shear-induced flocculation: the evolution of floe
structure and the shape of the size distribution at steady state. Water Resources.
30(5): 1049-1056.
Steiner, A.E., McLaren, D.A. and Forster, C.F. (1976). Nature of activated-sludge floes.
Water Research, 10(1): 25-30.
Summerfelt, S.T. (2006). Design and management of conventional fluidized-sand
biofilters. Aquaculture Engineering, 34: 275-302.
Tacon, A.G.J., Cody, J.J., Conquest, L.D., Divakaran, S., Forster, LP. and Decamp, O.E.
(2002). Effect of culture system on the nutrition and growth performance of Pacific
white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) fed different diets. Aquaculture
Nutrition, 8: 121-137.
Tacon, A.G.J., Hasan, M.R. and Subasinghe, R.P. (2006). Use of fishery resources as feed
inputs for aquaculture development: trends and policy implications. FAO (Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations): FAO Fisheries Circular No.
1018, pp.I 10.
Taw, N. (2010). Biofloc Technology Expanding At White Shrimp Farms Biofloc Systems
Deliver High Productivity With Sustainability. Global Aquaculture Advocate,
May/June, 2010. pp. 24-26.
Teitelbaum, J.E. and Walker, W. A. (2002). Nutritional impact of pre and pro-biotics as
protective gastrointestinal organisms. Annual Review ofNutrition, 22: 107-138.
Thakur, D.P. and Lin, C.K. (2003). Water quality and nutrient budget in closed shrimp
(Penaeus monodon) culture systems. Aquaculture Engineering, 27: 159-176.
UNWFP, (2005). The state of food insecurity in the world. Food and Agriculture
Organization, United Nations World Food Programme.
Van Wyk, P., Davis-Hodgkins, M., Laramore, C.R., Main, K., Mountain, J. and Scarpa, J.
(1999). Farming Marine Shrimp in Recirculating Freshwater Production Systems:
A Practical Manual. FDACS Contract #4520. Florida Department of
Agriculture ConsumerServices, Tallahassee, Florida, US.
Veerina, S. S., Nandeesha, M. C., Rao, K. G. and De Silva, S. S. (1993). Statis and
technology of Indian major carp farming in Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of
Asian Fish Society, 9: 76 .
XVIII
CURRICULAM. VITAE
Full Name: Madhurima Sarker
Email : madhurimasarker9@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:
2 Training at Fish Technological Station (FTS, Junput) under State Govt. in 2012
4 Block Survey on Status & Types of Fisheries in Nandakumar block under the Fishery
Extension Officer and Block Development Officer, Nandakumar block in 2012.
5 Training "Fisheries Work Experience Program" at North 24 Perganas Krishi Vigyan
Kendra (K.V.K), Ashokenagar, held during 17th to 23th August, 2012.
9 Training on different Central Institute like CIFE, Saltlake; CIFA, Rahara; CIFRI,
Barrackpore and BENFISH, Kolkata in 2012.
11 Training on "Ornamental Fish Breeding and Culture" from 04-10 August 2015 at
Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Salt lake, Kolkata.
PERSONAL DETAILS
Date of birth 20.11.1990
AJ:!;e 24+
Birth place Hooglv
Gender Female
Marital Status Unmarried
Blood J:!;roup o+
Category SC
Religion Hinduism
Nationality Indian
Correspondence Address Faculty of Fishery sciences,
5,budherhatroad, Chakgaria,panchasavar,kol-94
Permanent Address Rishra, Hoo,:!;lY, 712250
Hobbies I interests Readinj:?; Books, Singing song
Languages known:
I do hereby declare that the above mentioned particulars are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief.