998 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED Tanjanco ve Court of Appeals at 86 South B, Diliman, Quezon City, while defendant ic also flea ase, single and residing at 625 Padre ara, Manly ‘where be tay be served ith summon TH. That the plaotiff and the defendant became acquainted with each ether nmetime in December, 1957 and sont there ‘er, the defendant started visting and courting the palit HL, That the defendant's visite were regular and frequent and in due time the defendant expremed and pofemed his un Arng love and afeton forthe pitt wo see inde tine fe Spee he tener eae Cerri in he core a thle engement, the pani? od the defendant's ate went of youne people Ip love had | Freuent outings and date, became very awe and fntiate te H ‘consideration of the ‘ltendan’s promise of marrige, the paint coertel tnd 'Y, That gabsequent therto and roglarll until about July, 1980 exept TOP ort period ts December 1058 when ie defendant was aut of the Country, the defedaat though his protestations of love and promis of marriage suceeded in Iavingearnal Rnowiede with the laa ‘Vi, That as a remit of thelr intimate relstlonship, the att stand ctngine whch contol by tor in ely, 1088; VIL. That upon being certain of her pregnant conten, he pnt nerd the edn ad ede ih ho Sroaen their engagement snd a promace” ns "uae Mi ‘Over and above the parttan allegntons, the facts stand ct that for one whole year, from 1958 to 1959, the plain tittappells, a woman of adult age, maintained intimate TT ADD course. Such conduct iz Tcompytitie with the iden of seduction. Plainly there is here voluntariness and mutual passion; for had the appellant been deceived. had she sur rendered exclusively because of the deci artful pera sions and wiles of the defendant, she would not have again Fielded to his embrace, much iss for one year, without exacting eavy falfiment of the alleged promises of mar riage, aid would have cut short all sexual relations upon finding that defendant didnot Intend to fulfill his promises, VoL. 18, DECEMBER 17, 1966 999) Soriano va. Compatia Gonaral de Fabacos de Pilipinas — Hence, we conclude that no case is made under Article 21 of the Civil Code, and no other cause of action being leged, no error was committed by the Court of First In- Stance in dismissing the complaint. ‘Of course, the dsmisesl must be understood as without prejudice to whatever actions may correspond to the child ff the plaintiff agninst the defendant-appeliant, if any. ‘On that point, this Court. makes no pronouncement, since the childs own rights are not here involved. FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, the decision of the ‘Court of Appeals is reversed, and that of the Court of First Instance is affirmed. No costs, Concepcion, C4, Barrera, Dizon, Regala, Makelnta, Bengsom, JP. aldvar, Sanchez and Castro, J, concur. Decision reversed. No, 112892, December 17, 186, “Jose SontaN, plaintiff and appellant, ve. COMPARA GENE- ‘Ras Dp TABACES DE FUAPINAS, defendant and appellant. ‘ovigations; Sugar crap loan agreement; When the, ele of exported raat theadd ‘be redited tothe planter —Where he Teentant in Aururt, 3842 cbtaned the special permission ff be uma ltr fo npr the aera rar an armed with hat authority be defendant tm Tact export. 1600 cule SE toga tar he pntersatcunt, the efendant did ot need dina! authority to sell the said sugar. ‘The authoriation event the sugar incaded the authority to sel it for the Santee sceunt, ene, the planter i emled to be ered In the proceeds of the sai fom the date of shipment o® Tusust 18, Teel not om December Si, 1842, and the defendant ‘RUGS pay the’said proceeds with interest from August 18, in ‘Some; Beidence; When orp loom agreement comet be swried by parol cndener-—Where, under the crap Yo 8a ‘ent ht defendant wan authorined to sell the Panler's sua, ‘Mihout the planters moet or ineraction and to ereait the ‘lanter' account sith the proceeds ofthe sal, the defendant ex nc to prove thatthe Hrnlce was to secure ‘permiaon tell the su ‘lier the writen agreement. It is not allowed under ‘helpurel evidene Fle tnce the ease down not fal Weider 47 of the exrstions tothe rile Tar damage tompenction:_Interlndin ervomenaay paid by War Dene Commision