This document discusses questions regarding Apple's proposed alternative accounting for iPhones. It asks about the financial statement impact, whether Apple's non-GAAP numbers or GAAP better reflects economic reality, if Apple should lobby FASB to sanction their approach, and if the revenue recognition rule changing would matter.
This document discusses questions regarding Apple's proposed alternative accounting for iPhones. It asks about the financial statement impact, whether Apple's non-GAAP numbers or GAAP better reflects economic reality, if Apple should lobby FASB to sanction their approach, and if the revenue recognition rule changing would matter.
This document discusses questions regarding Apple's proposed alternative accounting for iPhones. It asks about the financial statement impact, whether Apple's non-GAAP numbers or GAAP better reflects economic reality, if Apple should lobby FASB to sanction their approach, and if the revenue recognition rule changing would matter.
Questions on the “Accounting for the iPhone at Apple, Inc.
” Case
1. Articulate the financial statement impact of the alternative accounting
proposed by Apple.
2. Under Apple's proposed alternative accounting, the reconciliation
between net income and cash flow from operations no longer reflects changes in deferred costs and revenues related to subscription accounting as displayed under the GAAP numbers. Which method best reflects the economic reality?
3. Should Apple lobby for their non-GAAP numbers to be sanctioned by
FASB?
4. Does it matter if the revenue recognition rule for smartphone changes?