‘SovuTions TO DIsCUSSON QuEsTIONS: a decision force the © md whe sunely exh oii 10.2 Voges aeons oa ante bass of TE tion ease t mabes eat arab that allocations 8 oats teincured mares yoo oF penalty. st Fest even rule cose se ecto 106) The PONE cach rome aera s 2 Stew ae = sen cei ae eae Sorc eet rove as low-cost an nit sped to be on thei jpumes} out that the Howest-ost FOwtes happened to be ryteneme aw emanate nan rom eit) Xa exo 1 a (from all sources). Ifa problem is ob is “establish either a demmy soarce (if demand is: greater than soppy) ‘ce 3 dummy destination (if demand is less than supply). Refer to nee er ln ma el cs ocr cea tS occa ne cel nga airs. ee remem aca 52th ina el sa ee tent eae a ny) =a ‘means the total cost for thé solution in the next table will be Bt ora eget te ong tn ta a ee eae ene yooh amelropere erp Est yds guia eh bese pelna ee as eer eee woe hime sap aa ees aera: Eapate cian hate nentnateaie sa ab etal ae Teens is ate ‘ect one empty square, place 2 zero in it, pretend as if it is occe- eicipticdmisramal nese ese et Seeatusncmaion tty ese Celene pa) |i, Neruransmi i top eae spit dua pata onsen oben seven bese esse 8 iN)" aemhanadbecnied his tick ere ate 7! + $09 ateratives. He 1 Tae, 10S. The ssigencat problem is a special case of the vass- sth pe ee Se shown cartier ia this chapter. This is illk eh the pps estima rein owen imation . ccunrtenso Teansre ravion AND ASSIGNMENT Moogys oY oe 1 Fou adams i brown cooper project Needs se nest come il asin sony The nich vor spect lcd ead ofa saindehllaleays be a problem when applying ge ctl method to assignment problems. The problem ite net ecause there will be enly One assignment'in g column. . Pry pee eer eed cheng ne est ee vi a Chan eo ne be Te ep ont a ee increased by $25. from $492 t0 $517 because of eget ‘charge for each of the ve workets ey 10-10. To exclude any unwanted OF unacceptle apne tee a ese ears ay ‘cost in the row and column representing that Nea focnt If, for example, all of the-rlocation cod fer Saas ee et pe bev $1.00 to $3003, ware sor os at be aclen be utara wgmoot Goss] Feonre rieeabntcerna. | eee escne ie wen acipecet taint o mos Exeter rout. “ce peng dw cone = a pron | ata | soston | cei ig Des Moines | 200) 100 G EJ i cvonite | vol] wf Sue |e Ele El ee Requirements | "200 200 300 | 7 Total cowt ofthis initial solution + 200455) + 10g) + 100188) +508) 185) ~ = 1.000 + 400 + 400 + 150 + 1230 = $3200 bbs To see if his intial slut provement indies foreach unused squst: S* EA FA, and FB: on is opti. 8 Scanned wit!a f HAPTER 10 TRANSFORTATION AND Asnenaeu MODELS epCwECwE-Bi0D-0 B33 44-4= 80 op At E-Bt0D-B lo D-A Tyg - ats S a tS FPA toF-CRE-CI0 EN OD-BODA wg 3-4 ban S482 249 MeeNY agent inde for sare [-C i835 THis ie “. nem atl etna sos. Pty sas eect cohn rr Ee iad. The table tow ile aematve optimal ston ie “hbo Po querque Des Moines Fort 3 Lauderdale ‘Warehouse Requirements |__200_| 200 300 ‘When the Fi Lauderdale row sfininated from furter cons 2 Meee fave: the opportunisy cots shown below, WE 20 50 units from Des Moines 19 “Then the only eraining Fa erate, we aspras are mae WPS PAS Neen Tae te agar umn fm comin fa this column have been allocated. We fink ‘costs based on the remaining rows and columas, erin ie proves the enretuny cens e the original ele. Bs bia eral changes a cane Lacy clin atti is tbe oil Ae aa swith a cst of 83.200. om poston | Cleveland |Capacity _ 9% o a BI To | Abe od so sol] 300 OM qr | norton _| cleveland |conecty T a 3 3 a 3 volt] of so, meets | 2 wtf CAs 7 5 = a 3 vole] aso Banos io] Els 7 for 7 5 20. 300 | 700 Lauderdale qj wol| 250+ Warehouse Wearerouts | zoo | 200 | * 300 ede of atemative opis seat 70-13. a. Hardrock’ - initial soluGon using the northwest comer tne yg) 128) ~ 1K!) +2989) ae shown Sew $3200 To T rant inn. Vhng VAM, we id he epporunity coe compa, At ais c__kespacty a a eel cach om on col) wih te ral fi ro j ec at SPhevreuts are given wo] 2» 10 | ‘eis We avoid te zh opportunity COM BY PANE 7 | Sein poate nd wet ct ea forte wow oreok el Ee} aw teh hestoppomaity cout j 3] 7 Te a . ° 3 Lb 30, G 30 Je ‘Albu- ~ [Factory Project ’ = ale. | soston | cleveland [Capac Foie ens | «0 | so | 1 5 a 3 Kot = 44510) # 3S 2S F 3S) © IHS) ‘mon | omy er; ee Sinite EF 2 Using the stepping-stone mir, he follow Jag improvement > = sot dices are compute te erate 8 Ld CI plant L-pooiect C= SUL = SE t S87 SE st Watoue a2 eee pth: 1-Cto Bw 2H 2) Levatements 3 plant 2-project A= rsiz ss $4 Sto St 200 | 20 | 30 Pe pathy 2 2B TW 10 Lan 3-peoier A reese 35 2st St0= 30 ThercwrCmrtete etal plant 3-projoct = 487-56 + 58° S57 a [closed path: 3wo3 C102-C 102-8) - to 7610, this intial sold Since all indices are greater han 9 jon schedule, nariely, 40 units {loved put + tion provides the optim Scanned with CamScanner_ Her Mootes ¢ sett w te Hall Real Cte ison i vase | _sonksst.” | rarkave. | ‘tone | ave es ant ne Avail $20, Sro008 | i : aoe es bx rm $0, bs. val =I =f tn / 0.000 ow $304 $120,000 z Jaa000 | ~s130,000 | s7a000 | ~ss00000 veold be $28.200, an averge fate of tis ee ‘Table for Problem 10-26 we frou ee ee for tahoe [note "rary Lane ‘tanta io oo oaneel-DTy eae rou Aree se 8 7s 3] sansa satis ptm 2 ake ovteans ls 0 1 a tampa snd DE De = eaten ics The problem Tay be set up as in the za CJ seer pe en pee A sabes wih XS TIS : ee te sons. ape 8 SME! _ ee ea payee ee Som OY AES real = ix 7" Fe oe of thse ares. Tis WOU SR c 2 Se dummy desing <= Saaoo + 81.800 + $8.400 + $5000 . -saa0 : yield ot appear inthe final sot ‘emmy sade to balance the probe pein olution has a cost of $65,700. ei ening investor in mons 122, S008 ldhe0 0, 20, and 30 respectively if, carrying ‘ost for the \egming inventory has already been ‘considered. The solution is ‘esame but the cost would be $65.300. 18 To deemne which ew pant wil yeh te OWES et ‘in combination with the existing plants. need 10 transportation problems. We BEEN PY 7 (tin tbl that pen The opening of the third PAE in er Oteans (ce the table). The nethest ‘comer in iii soto, The oa cost of fist soto iS a 9 be $23,600, You should note that the ‘cost of each individ st to distribution cee rout found by adsiog Me Senco te respective, unt re costs Ths ton sus sping cot of ON top caiee on 10 Los Angeles is S14 ($8 for shipping plus $6 for ing-stone method ro ts i a for unused rovies. Improvement index for Atlanta -+$11 (Atlanta toe New York route: sw Yor) $14 (Alana to Los Angels) +86 “459 CTolsa to Los Angeles) 512 (Tulsa to New Yor) Scanned with CamScanner again employ the st¢P- provement indices5 = qnreen so Tvsoonncon ao fave Mans specie mained, we asin sry ow, (0:38, The falowing fe Ls mete: 110 a age pve ws” Re tewng ims eign cm PE __— so gata it mei con Vi Camponent G3 10 Fon ioe ‘Componert C83 to plant 3 on CErronent 05 10 plont 4 030 cerpenent pea ta plant § O10 resent ex to plant 2 oor Cerrone E35 12 pant G06 035 So FE cansving 0 or Wins eS ore ete oe NEE ‘crew will go to Toronto: the Se® joo 1 Dette Balmore crew will go © Borer pew ane 0 miles. This maximum eer eet tte nines) sain probleme et ees sone te ste sled sing mi anf es ormics 7s ‘nee _ yntassatic : 8 wrimey management 20 Total rating 335, as Rating \ WS. lgnment b\, Yawn to cardiology 8 onesie 0 U0lO3Y 2 fardottoorthopedics * 4 2 Hoolihan 10 obstetrics in Total “cost sale” “86 pa Ehret subtracted from 27.1 because tis m5 ica ple. Zasgnment 7 Rating TarmenA ral Daraonc wa Barwon 8 15 2s |S on independent 28 overattrating 753 © ». ——— = ‘Semen ates “astro 3 6 tretspee 3 Da ees 9 omega 3 a — Naas - ira aon sot ake in so sie we amy oer oe Seep vey eae mec. 10.39. Component G99 to plant 1 total cost_F Students shoutd note the farge numbers Teasble production plans (ace Printout 12° the next 200. "Pre plan is Pautipte optimal solutions: "32,60.500 with 275 Per Shown ia Printout 2. Ther a Ayer he solution mv costs tron in reps time. onthe py $100 peri 10 $1800 Fe Hovering Tom pat 2 9 82.610.100, THe Pe” “son plan rernains te sme asin PitON! 2 tom Pan ergot is 1,200 per unit the Tal SOW 5257100, ° Scanned with CamScannerTaawsronTATION AND Assicnment MooeLs : CUSTOMER oes a @ Cover zeros 7 I [__o 4 Cover e108 ae mintines ext, = vaerd =. i= ot 4 = oiass jo subtract a smallest | #0 number next. . cs i. al Cover zeros Opel Se {ao wit ines next. taxiat post Ito customer © taxi at post 2o customer B taxi at post 3to customer A tau at post 4 to customer D . -Toral distance wiveled 4444644 = TB miles” fo-44.-. Original problem: SQUAD A 8 ‘c 2 E 7 “wf? 7 | 27 Row sub- . BB 2 stapepet ee a 3 oT 3 Ta] s | 21 done aba 4 a | 12 7 12 zoe Sami 5 13 | 25 | 24 26 8 10+ $500 + $1,000 : © nas es =e, [le]: I 7 apa to | 4 | 24 Column asl s: celle z wy} 1] 64 9 | 24 nee if 3 | 4 3 7] o/? 2 | 18 done s[4]|« 4 spoT s [aa et o u : 5 5 7 16 13 o Tl. ba f ; sous alelc|oele 2464 2 1 vo} 4 ]o | 4 | 24 ‘cover - o [1 [ 5 Column 2 aan cae] on fon Zaire el Ce with ot fi done next. 3 ve] ey 1]. 2 | 18_ tines aT 4 ofs fo] s | ar 2Biie r 5 a) 17 | i6 | 18 0 Scanned with CamScannerOptimal assignment: squad 1 to case C = squad 2t0 case D squad 310 casey squad 4 to ease A squad Sto case E . “Total person-days projected using this assignment = 3 +6 + 3+ TRANSPORTATION AND ASSIGHMENT Wop, B48 = 2 days, 1048. “Rssignment Rating ‘C53 at plant 1 TO cents 61 at plant 3 4 cents DS at plant 4 30 cents 44 at plant 2 14 conts : ‘Total manufacturing cost_58.cents 10-46. The major difference between the MODI and stepping: stone methods is in the procedure use¢ to test for optimal Inthe stepping-stone method, we first draw a closed path for each ofthe empty squares to calculate its improvement index. Then, the most favorahle square ( | In MODI, however, we frst identify the most favorable square (by using row and column numbers) and then draw a closed path (only f 10-47... A “northeast commer” rule would b directly analogous to the northwest comer rule, but it would simply begin in the upper right-hand core see in the table that thi four squares (inytead of the expected five) are Gccupied. The de- ‘gencracy condition, by the way. is just a peculiarity ofthe Exceu- ive Fumiture Coiporatin data. .. the one with the largest negative index) is that path) to direct us in improving the solution. stead of the upper left-hand comer. We 31 solution is degenerate because only SOLUTION TO ANOREW-CARTER i, “This cae presents some of the basic enenge SS Tg by we wamporaicn saree sa ook np of spe figurations of operating plants have tobe though requiring relatively few ication tege degeneracy if solved manually. The costae TTT Vie conan ae Ted All plants operating $179730 ig and? operating, 3 closed 188990 a 1 and3 operating, 2closed 183.40 | 349 Zand3 operating, closed 188300: ‘The lowest weekly total ems, operating pt closed, is $217,430. This is $3,300 per week (71. fr 1.5% less than the next most economical slo, three plants. Closing a plant without expanding gi, remaining’ plants means unémployment, The epéosa using plants 1 and 3. indicates overtime production Ot at plant 1 and O overtime at plant 3. The all pt oak use of overtime and include substantial dk pl sea 11,000 units (55%) in plant 2 and either 5:00 wit ing (19% of capacity) or 5,000 in plant 3 (20 of apcig) Te capacity versus unemployment question is at {quantitative aspect ofthe case and could tad tnd forecasts for the housing market and thus the pa’ ot ‘The optimum producing and shipping rates From To (Amount) Plant 1 (RT) W2 (13,000), wa (14.00) Plant 3 (R.T.)_ W1 (5,000); W3 (11,000 ‘wa (1,000); WS (8.000 Plant3 (0.1) W1 (4,000) eocig 3 ‘There are tveealtrative ei! poet terns, where R.T. = regular time, warehouse. . Getting the solution mancally shoul ET Scomer re, Ht wil ke CM SET the nonhwest ne 8 ve " aa. configuration, with degenet row auerave | seston’ | cleveland [eapacty Ran cone or rin er 2 4 “13 Itis strongly suggested that ‘software Be es Moines wht 0 ; ‘Wooo . a 3 Souimion 70 Oto OREGON Evansville 200 10 500 nent algoitin an A jet tou * S002 uf 5 {ime to complete a table wit exh Po tnutterdate | 300 = Warehouse a Requirements | 300 | 200 vo |p Pee Tom °. . Cathy Seem Scanned with CamScanner