Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACCREDITED
EDUCATION AND
TRAINING
IN ORAL AND
MAXILLOFACIAL
SURGERY
April 2020
Published by Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons
ABN: 97 343 369 579 | ACN: 617 702 548
The information in this handbook is correct at the time of publication. The Handbook is regularly updated,
users of the handbook are advised to consult the latest version which is available on the College website
at www.racds.org. Enquiries can be made to oms@racds.org
While the College has made every effort to provide accurate and relevant information, the onus is on
users of the handbook to ensure that they have made every effort to validate the information.
Contents Accredited Education and Training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Contents
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................7
ORAL MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY EDUCATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES....................................8
OMS DATES FOR 2020...........................................................................................................................9
GLOSSARY OF TERMS ........................................................................................................................10
FEES FOR 2020 .....................................................................................................................................12
Training ................................................................................................................................ 12
Assessment .......................................................................................................................... 12
Fellowship ............................................................................................................................ 12
TRAINING REGIONS AND REGIONAL DIRECTORS OF TRAINING .................................................13
APPROVED HOSPITALS AND ACCREDITED TRAINING POSTS ....................................................13
BOARD OF STUDIES FOR ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY AND COMMITTEES ...........14
Board of Studies ................................................................................................................... 14
Regional Surgical Committees ............................................................................................. 15
Accreditation Committee ...................................................................................................... 16
Overseas Trained Specialist Sub-Group (OTSC) ................................................................ 16
Training Committee .............................................................................................................. 17
Education Committee ........................................................................................................... 18
Research Subcommittee ...................................................................................................... 18
Examinations Committee ..................................................................................................... 19
Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Committee ................................................... 20
Selection Committee ............................................................................................................ 21
1 A – Section 1 .............................................................................................................................23
ELIGIBILITY PROCESS FOR SURGICAL TRAINING ............................................................ 23
1.1.1 Eligibility for OMS Surgical Training .......................................................................... 23
1.1.2 Eligibility Criteria for Surgical Training ...................................................................... 23
1.1.3 Registration in Australia ............................................................................................ 23
1.1.4 Registration in New Zealand ..................................................................................... 24
1.1.5 Failure to Maintain Required Registration ................................................................. 24
1.1.6 Eligibility Documentation .......................................................................................... 24
SELECTION PROCESS FOR SURGICAL TRAINING ............................................................ 25
1.2.1 Principles and Elements of the Selection Process .................................................... 25
1.2.2 Overview of Curriculum Vitae Assessment ............................................................... 25
1.2.3 Overview of Professional Performance Appraisal (PPA) Reports ............................ 26
1.2.4 Structured Interviews................................................................................................. 26
1.2.5 Guiding Principles ..................................................................................................... 26
1.2.6 Interview Procedures................................................................................................. 27
1.2.7 Outcome and Offers from Selection Process ............................................................ 27
2 A – Section 2 .............................................................................................................................29
SURGICAL TRAINING IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY ..................................... 29
2.1.1 Enrolment of Surgical Trainees ................................................................................. 29
2.1.2 Duration of the Program ............................................................................................ 29
2.1.3 Training Requirements of the Program ..................................................................... 30
2.1.4 Research ................................................................................................................... 30
2.1.5 Extension of Training for completion of research requirements................................ 32
2.1.6 Recognition of Overseas Training Experience .......................................................... 32
1 F - Section 1 ............................................................................................................................208
OMS MENTORING SCHEME ................................................................................................ 208
2 F - Section 2 ............................................................................................................................210
POLICIES ............................................................................................................................... 210
2.1.1 Reconsideration, Review and Appeal ..................................................................... 210
2.1.2 Plagiarism ................................................................................................................ 210
2.1.3 Trainees Requiring Assistance ............................................................................... 210
2.1.4 Bullying, Harassment & Discrimination ................................................................... 210
2.1.5 Admission to Fellowship .......................................................................................... 210
2.1.6 Overseas Trained Specialist Assessment Policy .................................................... 211
2.1.7 Complaints Policy .................................................................................................... 211
2.1.8 OMS FINAL EXAMINATION FORMAT AND MARKING POLICY .......................... 211
2.1.9 OMS Surgical Science and Training (SST) Examination Format and Marking Policy
211
2.1.10 Refund Policy .......................................................................................................... 212
2.1.11 Special consideration in assessment policy ............................................................ 212
APPENDIX 1- GUIDELINES FOR THE COMPILATION OF A LEARNING PORTFOLIO FOR ORAL
AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY ....................................................................................................214
APPENDIX 2- CASE PRESENTATION ...............................................................................................216
APPENDIX 3- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – REMOVAL OF AN IMPACTED 3RD
MOLAR.................................................................................................................................................217
APPENDIX 4- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – HARVEST OF A LOCAL BONE
GRAFT .................................................................................................................................................220
APPENDIX 5- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – HARVEST OF A DISTANT BONE
GRAFT .................................................................................................................................................223
APPENDIX 6- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS - UNCOMPLICATED PLACEMENT OF
DENTAL IMPLANT ..............................................................................................................................226
APPENDIX 7- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – CLOSURE OF ORO-ANTRAL
FISTULA...............................................................................................................................................229
APPENDIX 8- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – TRACHEOSTOMY............................232
APPENDIX 9- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – MANDIBULAR OSTEOTOMY ..........235
APPENDIX 10- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – MAXILLARY OSTEOTOMY ...........238
APPENDIX 11- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – INCISION AND DRAINAGE FACIAL
ABSCESS ............................................................................................................................................241
APPENDIX 12- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – ENUCLEATION OF A JAW CYST .244
APPENDIX 13- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS - SURGICAL APPROACHES TO THE
MANDIBLE – INTRAORAL .................................................................................................................247
APPENDIX 14- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS - SURGICAL APPROACH TO THE
MANDIBLE – EXTRAORAL ................................................................................................................250
APPENDIX 15- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS - SURGICAL APPROACH TO THE
ZYGOMATIC – ORBITAL COMPLEX .................................................................................................253
APPENDIX 16- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – MANDIBULAR FRACTURES
(EXCLUDING CONDYLES) .................................................................................................................256
APPENDIX 17- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – MAXILLARY FRACTURES ............259
APPENDIX 18- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – ZYGOMATIC COMPLEX
FRACTURES .......................................................................................................................................262
APPENDIX 19- ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIVE PROCESS – REMOVAL OF SUBMANDIBULAR
GLAND .................................................................................................................................................265
APPENDIX 20- TAC RATER SURVEY ...............................................................................................268
APPENDIX 21- SIX MONTHLY FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT FORM ...............................269
INTRODUCTION
The Handbook for Education and Training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (the Handbook) –
April 2020 supersedes the March 2019 Edition.
The Handbook provides comprehensive information on the policy and guidelines for the training
program including an outline of the curriculum and related administrative instructions and general
information for trainees, Supervisors of trainees, Directors of Training, and members of
committees involved in the education and training program for oral and maxillofacial surgeons.
The Handbook is revised regularly, and trainees must comply with the version that is current at
the time that they commence the first year of training.
The Board and its sub-committees will continue their commitment to develop and improve the
way in which the OMS training program is implemented. The Board’s endeavours are
strengthened by input from those involved in the OMS specialty at all levels, so please feel
encouraged to contact the College via oms@racds.org. Thank you to those who have provided
feedback.
The primary objectives of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons (RACDS) are:
• to advance the science and art of dentistry
• to encourage study and research in the field of dental science and cognate subjects, and
The RACDS’ Vision is: “To enhance oral health in the community through respected international
leadership in the provision of postgraduate education, professional development and educational
qualifications in dentistry.”
The Mission of the RACDS: “Promotes professional excellence in dentistry through the provision of
evidenced based dental education, professional development and examination.”
The purpose of the OMS training program is to ensure that all candidates who are awarded the
FRACDS(OMS):
• are highly competent practitioners in OMS
• have the requisite knowledge, skills and professional attitudes for successful independent practice,
and
• have the necessary attitudes and attributes to strive for continual review and improvement of their
practice.
Saturday 15th February Final date for Logbook Summaries, Six-Monthly Formative
Assessment Forms and Clinical Training Assessments to
be received by the College for trainees occupying
accredited training posts in 2020
Monday 2nd March Closing date for registration for the SST Examination
Tuesday 1st April Enrolments close for applications for re-entry for training
Friday 8th May Closing date for Applications for Eligibility for Surgical
Training positions for 2021
Monday 22nd June Closing date for Applications for Assessment of Eligibility
for the Final Examination
Saturday 25th July Training Program Selection Interviews for 2021, Sydney
Friday 14th August Closing date for registration for the Final Examination
Saturday 15th August Due date for Six-Monthly Formative Assessment Forms
and Clinical Training Assessments to be received by the
College for trainees occupying accredited training posts in
2020
Monday 26th & Tuesday 27th October Final Examination - Written papers
Venue: Regionally and New Zealand
Friday 13th & Saturday 14th Final Examination – Clinical and Viva Voce
November Venue: Epworth Centre, Melbourne
Tuesday 15th December Closing date for submission of applications for Approved
Positions for 2021
For further 2020 calendar dates please visit the RACDS website
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
ANZAOMS Australian and New Zealand Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
ASSET Australian and New Zealand Surgical Skills Education and Training
Board/BoS OMS Board of Studies for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RACDS
HETOMS Handbook for Accredited Education and Training in Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery
IAOMS International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
SCOMS Standards and Criteria for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Accreditation)
Training
Overseas Australian
Resident Resident
$AUD $AUD
Assessment
Application for selection for Surgical Training Positions 2020 1,588.00# 1,588.00#
Application for Assessment of Eligibility for the Final Examination 629.00 # 629.0 0 #
Fellowship
These Directors of Training, covering Australia and New Zealand, are responsible for the relevant OMS
training centre (refer to Part B - Section 2 for an expanded list of responsibilities)
This information can be obtained from the Education Officer – OMS or the Director of Training in each
Training Centre.
The Board of Studies for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and its Committees have been established to
formulate and review training and assessment in requirements leading to the attainment of the FRACDS
(OMS) and maintenance of professional standards in the specialty. The Board reverses the right to end
the term of service for Committee members at any point for any reason.
Board of Studies
Membership
Ex officio
Dr Julia Dando Registrar - OMS
Dr Paul Sambrook President - RACDS
Dr Dimitrious Nikolarakos President - ANZAOMS
Terms of Reference
• Training in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
• The Fellowship Examination
• Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
• Assessment of International Medical Graduates for the regulatory bodies in Australia and New
Zealand
• Advise the Board of the College and the Council of ANZAOMS in relation to teaching and training
programs in the special field of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
• Assist the Board of Examiners in the conduct of examinations for Fellowship in the Special Field of
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
• Hold three business meetings per annum and any other meetings convened by the Chair. One of
these business meetings annually is to be known as the Annual Meeting and held not later than
October.
• Forward minutes of the business meetings to the Board of the College
• Advise the Finance Committee, Board of the College and the Council of ANZAOMS in advance on
the financial aspects of the Board of Studies’ activities.
• Advise the Board of the College and the Council of ANZAOMS on any matters in the Special Field
that may concern the interests of the College or the Association.
• Prepare guidelines to assist in the continued management of the Board of Studies’ activities.
This should include:
Regional Chairs
Dr Simon Lou New Zealand
Dr Robert Witherspoon New South Wales & Australian Capital Territory
Dr Alistair Reid Queensland
Dr Miles Doddridge South Australia
A/Prof Alf Nastri Victoria & Tasmania
A/Prof Dieter Gebauer Western Australia
Terms of Reference
• To discuss and act on any matter of interest related to Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery training in the
Training Centre; and in keeping with existing College policy, to act upon determinations from the
discussions
• To implement and supervise the provision of training to accredited trainees within their Training
Centre, by discussion with the supervisors of training at each individual campus
• To facilitate educational training, based on the curriculum, to Trainees
• To conduct a biennial review of Trainee progress and to convene specific meetings with trainees
who have borderline or unsatisfactory reports to discuss their progress
• To discuss the allocation of trainees to training posts
• To advise the Selection Committee of available training posts for commencement of training the
following year
• To discuss any matters referred from the College and to provide reports as required for accreditation
• The RSC reports to the Board of Studies – Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
• The RSC will be responsible for submitting applications for new posts to the Accreditation
Committee
• The RSC will be involved in the preparation and the conduct of the Accreditation Review of the
Training Centre
• To appoint subcommittees and working parties, such as Research & Education, as may be required,
to conduct the business of the RSC
• To nominate or appoint State or NZ representatives to the College committees as required
Accreditation Committee
Membership
Ex officio
Dr Scott Borgna Chair, BoS - OMS
Dr Julia Dando Registrar - OMS
Dr Paul Sambrook President - RACDS
Terms of Reference
• Implement Board of Studies’ policy on accreditation and provide advice to the Board of Studies on
accreditation matters
• Develop and ongoing review of accreditation guidelines for regional training centres and posts of
the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery training program
• Develop and review accreditation template documentation
• Appoint accreditation teams and undertake site visits for the purposes of accreditation of regional
training centres and posts of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery training program
• Monitor the performance of regional training centres to ensure they maintain minimum standards
whilst accredited and meet any conditions imposed on their accreditation
• Collect and analyse annual survey data for training centres for report to the Board of Studies
• Maintain an up to date record of training centres and posts, including accreditation conditions and
status
• Recommend to the Board of Studies for review of the accreditation status of training centres or posts
which do not fulfil accreditation guidelines or meet any conditions imposed on their accreditation
• Develop and review the roles and responsibilities of Directors of Training, Supervisors of Training
and the Regional Surgical Committee
• Support the development of additional training posts in Australia and New Zealand
• Develop and implement -
- Post fellowship credentialing and
- Micro-credentialing for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
• Advise the Board on applications from overseas trained specialist Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• Advise the Board of the Accreditation Visits being conducted each year, to allow the College to
budget for the expenditure related to the conduct of the accreditation process
Membership
Standing Members
Dr Jason Erasmus Chair, Accreditation Committee Member
Dr Christopher Sealey Member, Accreditation Committee Member
Dr Geoff Findlay Member, Accreditation Committee Member
Ex officio
Dr Scott Borgna Chair, BoS - OMS
Dr Julia Dando Registrar - OMS
Dr Paul Sambrook President - RACDS
Terms of Reference
• Implement Board of Studies’ policy on the assessment of Overseas Trained OMS (OTOMS) and
provide advice to the Board of Studies on registration of OMS matters.
• Assess all OTOMS submission documentation.
• Conduct interviews with the OTOMS when necessary.
• Assess Area of Need applications to ensure the applicant will meet the requirements of the
position description as determined by the hospital.
• Appoint a SIMG that has been through the Specialist International Medical Graduate process to
the OTSC as required
• Appoint a Community member OTSC as required
• Liaise with the AMC and MCNZ to ensure RACDS is meeting the processes and protocols of the
registration of International Medical Graduates.
• Complete all documentation as required by Medical Board of Australia (MBA) and the Medical
council of New Zealand (MCNZ)
• Regularly review the OTOMS policy to ensure compliance with the MBA and the MBA policy,
requirements and guidelines
• Recommend to the Board of Studies any changes that may be required to the OTOMS policy
Training Committee
Membership
A/Prof Jocelyn Shand Chair
Dr Benjamin Erzetic Member
Dr Christopher Poon Member
Dr Geoff Findlay Member
Dr Robert Witherspoon Member
Ex officio
Dr Scott Borgna Chair, BoS - OMS
Dr Julia Dando Registrar - OMS
Dr Paul Sambrook President - RACDS
Terms of Reference
• Review borderline and unsatisfactory reports following formative assessment processes
• Advise trainees on their current training status, progression in the program and variation due to
part-time, interrupted or leave from training
• Advise trainees who have received borderline or unsatisfactory formative assessment reports of
their current training status and of variation in training requirements
• Advise the relevant Regional Surgical Committee and Board of Studies regarding trainees who
have received borderline or unsatisfactory formative assessment reports, variation in training
requirements and remedial plan
• Review mentor progress reports for any trainees who have received a borderline or unsatisfactory
Education Committee
Membership
A/Prof Dylan Hyam Chair
Dr Andrew Cheng Member
Dr George Chu Member
Dr Stuart Deane Member
A/Prof Dieter Gebauer Member
Prof Robert Jones Member
Dr Simon Lou Member
Ex officio
Dr Scott Borgna Chair, BoS - OMS
Dr Julia Dando Registrar - OMS
Dr Paul Sambrook President - RACDS
Terms of Reference
• Monitor the content and duration of oral and maxillofacial surgery training, including research
• Identify resources for the implementation of the modular curriculum in regional training centres
• Oversee the implementation and conduct of the modular curriculum in regional training centres
• Design and implement an assessment strategy based on the modular curriculum
• Review evaluate and update curriculum and assessment methodology
• Review submitted research study proposals via the Research Subcommittee
• Assess the completion of the trainees’ research requirements
• Annually audit trainee log-books and to review the experience of trainees in relation to the curriculum
• Develop and implement workshops for regional directors and supervisors of training to ensure
consistent trainee assessment across Australia and New Zealand
• Oversee the establishment and maintenance of the mentoring scheme
Research Subcommittee
Membership
Dr Richard Harris Chair
Prof Alastair Goss Member
Prof Robert Jones Member
Prof Frank Monsour Member
A/Prof Arun Chandu Member
Ex officio
Dr Scott Borgna Chair, BoS - OMS
Terms of Reference
• Approve research proposals for OMS trainees in accordance with the Handbook for Accredited
Education and Training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Handbook) and determine the nature of
the research and its relevance to OMS or Surgery in General
• Advise on the methods of assessment for the research projects
• Review the requirements for research published in the Handbook
• Monitor and review the six-monthly progress reports
• Ensure that all OMS trainees are able to:
- Understand basic research methodology
- To critically review and understand the scientific literature
- Carry out a research project which is peer reviewed and acceptable for publication in a recognised
journal or a University degree which has been peer reviewed and accepted by the University
involved.
• Provide advice to the Education Committee regarding research proposals and projects
Examinations Committee
Membership
Dr Julia Dando Chair
Dr John Harrison Member
Prof Andrew Heggie Member
A/Prof Dylan Hyam Member
Dr Christopher Poon Member
A/ Prof Jocelyn Shand Member
Ex officio
Dr Scott Borgna Chair, BoS - OMS
Dr Paul Sambrook President - RACDS
Terms of Reference
• Implement College Board policy on examination standards and procedures and provide advice to
the Board of Studies on examination matters
• Ensure the SST Examination is at an appropriate standard
• Ensure the Final Examination is at an appropriate exit level standard for a specialist Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgeon
• Develop guidelines for the conduct of examinations and recommend location and time of
examinations each year
• Determine the format of the examinations and the structure and marking scheme of each individual
component of the examination
• Maintain a list of potential Examiners and have responsibility for succession planning for the position
of Chair of the Court of Examiners
• Recommend to the Board of Studies appointment of Examiners and a co-ordinator for each
Examination
• Develop guidelines for the conduct of examinations, responsibilities of Examiners and undertake
training of Examiners
• Monitor and analyse, and periodically evaluate examinations, including feedback from Examiners
(including external Examiners), observers and candidates regarding the standard, format and
conduct.
• Provide a report to the Board regarding the conduct of the examinations within eight weeks of the
examination
• Advise the Board of the examination processes being conducted each year, to allow the College to
budget for the expenditure related to the conduct of the examinations
Membership
Dr Weber Huang Chair
A/Prof Bruce Austin Member
Dr Ankit Garg Member
Dr Derek Goodisson Member
Dr James Kim Member
Dr Samuel Kim Member
A/Prof Kai Lee Member
Dr Christopher Lim Member
Dr Jameel Kaderbhai New Fellow Member
Dr Timothy Manzie Trainee Representative
Ex officio
Dr Scott Borgna Chair, BoS - OMS
Dr Julia Dando Registrar - OMS
Dr Paul Sambrook President - RACDS
Terms of Reference
• Ensure the CPD Program meets the requirements of the MCNZ, DBA, DCNZ and the Medical Board
of Australia’s Professional Performance Framework,
• Develop appropriate criteria for minimum levels of participation of OMS Fellows in Continuing
Professional Development (CPD) activities
• Maintain and review the program of CPD in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
• Liaise with ANZAOMS to ensure an appropriate range and level of CPD activities are provided to
assist Fellows in meeting their CPD requirements
• Develop credentialing guidelines for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
• Act as an advisory body for Oral and Maxillofacial surgical credentialing issues
• Assist hospital credentialing bodies by nominating appropriate Fellows to participate in periodic
appointment reviews and advise on relevant guidelines and standards
• On request of registration bodies, and with the permission of the Fellow concerned, provide
appropriate statements to these bodies in relation to the participation of Fellows in CPD activities
• Consider applications and provide guidelines for the performance of surgical procedures, which are
new, or as yet of unproven value
• Recommend to the Board of Studies for provision of an annual course of revision in Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery for trainees and existing specialists
Selection Committee
Membership
A/Prof Jocelyn Shand Chair
Dr Benjamin Erzetic Member
Dr Emma Lewis Member
Dr Robert Witherspoon Member
Ex officio
Dr Scott Borgna Chair, BoS - OMS
Dr Julia Dando Registrar - OMS
Dr Paul Sambrook President - RACDS
Terms of Reference
• To manage the eligibility process for surgical training in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) and to
identify the applicants who are deemed eligible to apply for selection
• To identify training positions in Australia and New Zealand available for the commencement of
training for the following year
• To ensure that the Selection Process is appropriately structured to reflect the standard required for
specialist surgical training in OMS as accredited by the joint Australian Medical Council and
Australian Dental Council, and New Zealand bodies
• To maintain and continue to develop the guidelines for the selection process and the marking
templates for the individual components of the selection process
• To maintain and continue to develop the guidelines for the conduct of the selection process and to
recommend the location and date for the annual selection interviews
• To constitute interview panels for the annual selection process and to develop standardised
questions for the panels
• To recommend to the Board of Studies a benchmark for the selection process for each year below
which applicants are deemed unsuitable for training in the specialty
• To co-ordinate and monitor the process of offers to selected applicants for accredited training within
the Training Centres
• To provide a report to the Board of Studies regarding the conduct of the selection process and
interviews within eight weeks of the completion of each annual selection process
• To assist the College in the preparation of a feedback report for unsuitable applicants
• To monitor, analyse and periodically evaluate the selection process by seeking feedback from the
Directors of Training and other independent observers
1 A – SECTION 1
The purpose of the eligibility process is to determine the applicant’s eligibility to apply for selection for
appointment to an accredited training post in the next calendar year. Eligibility is only valid for the
calendar year as stated and if the applicant is unsuccessful in gaining a post during the stated year
eligibility lapses.
If an applicant is deemed eligible but does not occupy an accredited training post for the next calendar
year, their eligibility will lapse, and it will be necessary to reapply for eligibility in the following year.
In order to apply for eligibility for OMS Training, the applicant will be required to have completed the
following pre-requisites, or to have completed them prior to the commencement of surgical training:
2. A Medical degree and full registration as a medical practitioner in Australia or New Zealand
3. A full year of surgery in general (SIG) must be completed prior to the commencement of OMS
training. Surgical rotations during this year should be undertaken in related surgical disciplines for
a minimum of nine months e.g. ENT surgery, orthopaedic surgery, neurosurgery, ophthalmology,
general & trauma surgery, plastic surgery, ICU, Anaesthetics and Emergency Medicine. If
undertaking a first-year general surgical resident position in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, three (3)
months to a maximum of six (6) months duration will be considered.
4. Meet any residency or visa requirements enabling employment at any hospital within the
jurisdiction(s) for which they are applying
For applicants who are undertaking the final year of a dental degree, the successful completion of
the degree will be required prior to the commencement of surgical training.
1. Trainees in Australia are required to have general registration from the Medical Board of Australia
and the Dental Board of Australia without conditions or undertakings.
3. Trainees based in New Zealand for the majority of their training must, for the duration of any
Australian rotations, obtain a level of registration from the Medical Board of Australia and Dentist
Board of Australia that enables full participation in the training program.
1. Trainees based in New Zealand are required to have general scope registration or restricted
general scope registration in the speciality of training from the Medical Council of New Zealand and
the Dental Council of New Zealand without conditions.
3. Trainees based in Australia for the majority of their training must, for the duration of New Zealand
rotations, obtain from the Medical Council of New Zealand and Dental Council of New Zealand a
level of registration that enables full participation in the training program.
Failure to maintain the required level of registration may result in disciplinary action, include (but not
limited to) dismissal from the training program.
The Board of Studies will issue an Application for Eligibility for Surgical Training Positions 2021 on
request. The following certified documents will be required to satisfy the criteria in 1.2, and should be
attached to the application:
• certified copies of dental & medical degrees
• certified copies of dental & medical registration certificates
• certified copies of academic transcripts.
• A detailed CV containing all academic results, past posts, research, awards, electives, and
publications.
• For those applicants engaged in a research degree application paperwork for selection should
include a letter of support from candidate’s research supervisor.
• A list of all consultants with whom the applicant has worked during their basic training and
undergraduate years is also to be provided along with their contact email addresses. This list should
contain a minimum of eight consultants and a standardised questionnaire regarding the applicant
will be used to collate the information for Professional Performance Appraisal (PPA).
The information above must be submitted to the College by 5 pm on Friday, 8 May 2020. Late
applications will not be accepted. Applicants are responsible for submitting the supporting
documentation by the published deadline and documents will not be accepted following this.
Incomplete applications may result in withdrawal from the eligibility process. Applications
should be submitted to the OMS Education Officer, via post. The “Selection Process” is
overseen by the Selection Committee, Board of Studies. Selection Interviews will take place on
Saturday, 25 July 2020. Selection Interviews will take place on Saturday, 25 July 2020 however
this date is provisional and may be reviewed depending on the progress of the virus pandemic.
Principles of Selection
• Selection aims to identify those applicants with the knowledge, skills, values, attitudes and aptitude
required to become a competent OMS.
• Selection involves assessment of the attributes and behaviours and takes into account applicants’
clinical experience, academic and other achievements.
• Selection criteria for application to OMS training include generic and specialty specific components.
• Selection is the responsibility of the agencies (including employers) which deliver the education
and training and involves suitably trained & experienced members of the OMS profession and other
independent persons.
• Structured curricula vitae (CV) assessment provides important verifiable biographical information
on clinical experience, academic and other accomplishments.
• Structured professional performance appraisal (PPA) reports credible information from consultants
and supervisors based on their first-hand experience of an applicant’s performance in the working
and learning environment.
• Structured interviews yield important information not available from other selection tools and use
questions particularly targeting non-technical personal attributes and behaviours.
There are three major elements of the selection process for Surgical Training.
Tools %
Curriculum Vitae 20
Interview 45
Total 100
The curriculum vitae is designed to capture information on the applicant’s academic record, research,
publications, presentations and awards, and aspects of his/her training and experience.
The curriculum vitae will account for 20% of the overall score. Representatives from each Training
Centre will assess the application forms independently. Marks will be given according to a standardised
assessment in the following areas and a CV scoring guideline can be found here:
a. undergraduate and tertiary academic achievement
b. surgical experience
c. scientific meetings
d. preparation for OMS Training (e.g. courses and clinical experience in OMS)
e. research and/or publications, presentations
f. prizes and awards
g. special achievements (other than dentistry and medicine).
The Selection Committee may contact hospital units and Consultants to ensure that the information
provided in the applicant’s history is correct.
The PPA is on on-line tool to gather confidential information from consultants and supervisors who are
familiar with the applicant’s professional and/or technical capabilities and skills, as well as clinical
performance and personal attributes.
The PPA accounts for 35% of the overall score for OMS applicants.
The PPA reports will be sought from at least eight consultants who have been named by the applicant
as previous supervisors. Four consultants will be nominated by the applicant and four will be selected
by the Selection Committee from the list provided of all previous posts and Consultants. An online
system will be utilised to facilitate the confidential responses from supervisors and to enable each
Training Centre representative(s) to assign marks for each applicant independently.
The structured interview is intended to enable evaluation of the applicants’ professional attributes and
behaviours relating to the broad competencies for training in OMS, other than ‘medical and dental expert’
and ‘technical expert’, as well as preparation for OMS training. The interview is conducted by a panel.
The structured interview accounts for 45% of the overall score for applicants.
The fair and transparent interview process is underpinned by the following principles:
• Three separate Panels will conduct interviews as part of the “Selection Process”
• Up to three representatives from each Training Centre Program will be present
• Representatives from each Program will change at regular intervals between the Panels to provide
a fair and even mix for assessment.
• The interview is to be used to explore the capacities and qualities of the interviewee in relation to
matters in the criteria for selection
• Applicants will be given sufficient notice of interview to allow them to be present and to prospectively
consider their responses to the selection criteria.
Applicants should normally be supplied with their interview time and advice of the nature of the
interview at least one week before the interview.
The Interview
• Interviews will be scheduled on the same day at a location to be notified on the College website
• Applicants are responsible for all of the travel & accommodation costs incurred when attending the
interview
• The same amount of time will be allowed for the semi-structured interview of each applicant
(approximately 15 minutes) in each of the three Panels (total 45 minutes)
• The Chair of the Selection Committee will determine a final list of questions to be put to all
interviewees. However, these standard questions will be supplemented with questions which arise
from the interview process and the follow-up questions may vary based on the responses provided
• All interviews will be standardised
• There will be opportunity for interviewees to ask questions and comment on any matters related to
the process.
Interview Questions
Five areas related to the selection criteria will be covered in the interview:
1. professional experience and communication
2. ethics and judgement
3. academic skills and medical/dental expertise
4. patient care and clinical decision making
5. preparation for OMS training.
Each Training Centre will collate the results of the tools of the “Selection Process” for a final score and
the applicants will be ranked. Offers will be made simultaneously on the Monday morning, following the
interviews, by each Training Centre Program for their available accredited posts. Applicants will have
two (2) days to respond, until the COB Tuesday (AEST) to decline or accept the offer. Following this
first round of offers, remaining available posts will then be simultaneously offered to those yet to be
selected on Thursday with a two (2) day response period until COB on Friday. The process will be
continued until all posts are filled. When this has occurred, unsuccessful applicants will be informed,
and unsuitable applicants will be notified.
Successful: an applicant who has satisfied the criteria and as a result of their ranking has been
selected for a training position
Unsuccessful: an applicant who has satisfied the criteria but as a result of their ranking has not been
selected for a training position in the first round of offers. An unsuccessful applicant can be
considered if a post becomes available in the second-round offer process.
Unsuitable: an applicant who does not satisfy the minimum selection criteria and will not be eligible
for consideration for a training position
Successful applicants will be contacted by the relevant Director of Training who, together with the
Regional Surgical Committee, will organise the training rotations and hospital affiliations.
Applicants who are deemed Unsuitable will receive general information on the minimum selection criteria
that was not achieved.
2 A – SECTION 2
All trainees must complete the subscription and enrolment process with the College and pay the
requisite fees prior to occupying an accredited training position.
It is the trainee’s responsibility to enrol with the College by 15 February each year. Trainees who have
not enrolled by 15 February will not have training accredited for the period of time they remain
non-financial.
Trainees enrolled in previous years must submit to the College also by the 15 February:
• Annual Logbook summary for the previous year verified by the Director of Training
• The two, Six-Monthly Formative Assessment forms.
Trainees are not appointed for the entire training period; they occupy accredited posts on a yearly basis.
It is the responsibility of the trainee to secure suitable training posts. The period of four years of
continuous training is a minimum, and additional time may be required if logbook experience is
inadequate, formative assessments are unsatisfactory, if there is loss of training time due to illness or
other problems or failure to complete any of the listed requirements for the completion of training such
as the mandatory research requirements.
The maximum leave entitlement for trainees who are undertaking full-time training is six (6) weeks per
year and is inclusive of annual leave, compassionate, parental leave, study & examination leave and
personal & carers leave. Trainees who wish to take more than the annual leave and additional leave
entitlements must receive prior approval for interruption of training or extension of leave from the Board
of Studies and it is also subject to approval by the employing authority.
It is recognised that a single training post in any training centre may not offer complete training. A
combination of training posts by rotation in the same, or various training centres, constitutes the training
pathway.
Transfer between Training Centres must be approved by the Regional Surgical Committees of both
Training Centres and written confirmation of the planned transfer is submitted to the OMS Education
Officer by the Training Centres. Trainees must demonstrate satisfactory training progress and requests
for transfer will not be approved during an unsatisfactory term or where the previous term has been
borderline or unsatisfactory. A rotation between Training Centres that has been approved may be
withdrawn if the transfer coincides with a subsequent borderline or unsatisfactory term.
In summary:
1. Trainees must successfully complete a minimum of four years full time in accredited posts.
2. Training time completed in an accredited post is credited in periods of six (6) or 12 months only.
The six (6) month training rotations must be undertaken continuously in the same position.
3. Trainees are required to keep logbooks of clinical training. An Annual Logbook Summary must be
completed, included in the trainee’s learning portfolio and submitted to the College.
4. Six-Monthly Assessment reports are to be completed by the end of July and January and
submitted to the College by 15 August and 15 February respectively.
2.1.4 RESEARCH
The mandatory research requirements are required for the award of Fellowship for trainees who
commenced OMS 1 or BST (OMS) training after June 2009.
The research requirements have two parts:
• Research study
• Presentations
Pathway 2 - Independent research culminating in a paper that is deemed acceptable for publication
in a peer-reviewed journal for trainees who commenced training prior to 2018. Those who
commenced training in 2018 or beyond are required to have their paper accepted for publication.
All trainees must submit their research study proposal to the Research Subcommittee by 15th February
of OMS 2. There are research requirement forms for pathway 1 and 2, FOMS13 and FOMS14, and
these should be submitted at the earliest date for consideration by the Research Sub-committee so that
any recommendations for change or modification can be undertaken in timely way. Please allow up to
four (4) weeks for a research proposal submission to be considered by the Research Sub-committee.
Pathway 1 Proposal
Trainees who are undertaking a University qualification must complete and submit FOMS14 - OMS
Research Requirement Pathway 1 when the research study has been approved by the University and
enrolment completed. The submission of the form must be made by 15th February of OMS 2.
Trainees who choose to fulfil this requirement by enrolling in a PhD will be required to take leave of
absence from the training course and will need to apply for Interrupted Training.
Pathway 2 Proposal
Trainees who plan to fulfil the research requirement independently of a postgraduate degree
(Pathway 2) must apply to the Research Sub-Committee (of the Education Committee) with the
submission of FOMS13 and an outline of the research paper for approval of their proposed research
study and their supervisors. If relevant to the study, ethics approval should also be submitted. The Sub-
Committee will assess the research proposal and advise trainees of the requirements for the submission
of their study, which will be of an equivalent standard to that of a higher degree qualification.
Trainees are advised to contact the OMS Education Officer if they wish to make a submission to the
Research Sub-committee. The submissions must be made to the Research Subcommittee by 15th
February of OMS 2. Clinical case reports and stand-alone literature reviews will not be approved for this
purpose.
Trainees who wish to submit a completed research qualification for consideration of fulfilment of their
research requirements must submit the following to the OMS Education Officer, for review by the
Research Subcommittee, by 30 June of OMS 2:
1. Details of the research supervisor(s) and institution
2. Brief description of the research
3. Details of any paper /publications related to the study
4. Details of any related presentations
5. Certified copy of degree
It is recommended that trainees applying for recognition of prior research submit their application in their
first year of training and well in advance of 30 June OMS 2.
Completed Research
Following completion of the research project the paper must be submitted to the Research Sub-
committee for review and approval for the fulfilment of the requirements. For those who have
commenced training in 2018 or beyond, a copy of the paper accepted for publication in a referred journal
must be provided.
Completed research must be submitted to the College for review by the Research Sub-committee by 1st
December of the final year of training, OMS4. Please allow up to four (4) weeks for a completed research
to be considered by the Research Sub-committee.
A Completion of Research Requirement Form must be completed by trainees and their DoTs and
attached to applications for Fellowship (FRACDS(OMS)).The research component must have been
completed prior to the award of the Fellowship.
In addition, trainees in Pathway 2 must enrol in a research methodology course (such as a University
post-graduate course or an approved research skills course) or undertake the RACS Critical Literature
Evaluation and Research (CLEAR) course, unless otherwise advised by the Research Subcommittee.
Presentations
All trainees with mandatory research requirements are also required to:
a. present a paper each year at a scientific meeting, the annual conference of the specialty, college
convocation, a hospital grand round, or equivalent; and
b. present a paper at the annual conference of the specialty or equivalent as approved by the
Research Subcommittee at least once during their advanced surgical training.
If trainees have completed their training time and the Final Examination however they have not fulfilled
the mandatory research requirements, then an extension of training time will be required to complete
their research. Extension of training for the completion of research is undertaken in six (6) month periods
to a maximum of three (3) periods of extension, to 18-months. A fee of 50% of the Annual Trainee
Registration will apply for each six (6) month period of extension.
All trainees must complete the Extension of Training form enrolment process with the College and pay
the requisite fees for extension of training for the completion of research.
c. A suitable supervisor must be identified, this supervisor will be responsible for the:
i. completion of Six-Monthly Formative Assessments
ii. overseeing the completion of any clinical training assessments during the overseas
rotation.
d. An Annual Logbook summary Sheet must be completed then verified by the identified supervisor
and submitted to the College at the completion of the training rotation for training time to be
accredited.
e. Satisfactory Six-Monthly Formative Assessment reports must be submitted to the College, for
training time to be accredited.
f. Trainees must continue to undertake components of the program in accordance with the normal
progression of program requirements.
g. Trainees must remain enrolled with the College and pay the trainee enrolment fee whilst
participating in an approved overseas program.
Trainees must maintain a Learning Portfolio. The Portfolio should contain annual logbook summaries,
copies of all assessment forms, Team Appraisal of Conduct (TAC) report, certificates of any relevant
courses completed, conferences attended and all presentations. The portfolio must be keep up-to-date
and contain all the required documentation and reports. It will be submitted to the Director of Training
as part of the completion of training requirements.
The Training Portfolio is reviewed as part of the completion of training requirements and it must be
satisfactorily maintained.
A full explanation of what the Learning Portfolio should contain and how it should be presented and
maintained is described in Appendix 1.
Leave from training is allowed only in special circumstances and according to the employment
conditions of the locality in which the trainee is employed.
The College has policies on Part-time Training and Interrupted Training (refer Part A - Section 5).
Trainees must complete prescribed courses, currently: Australian and New Zealand Surgical Skills
Education and Training (ASSET), Emergency Management of Severe Trauma (EMST) and Care of the
Critically Ill Surgical Patient (CCrlSP), by 31 October in their second year, OMS 2, of training.
The SST examination is to be undertaken in the first year (OMS1) or in the year of applying for selection
into the program if the applicant has both registration in medicine and dentistry and undertaking or has
completed a surgery-in-general (SIG) year from 2019 onwards. A pass in this examination is mandatory
to proceed into OMS 2.
A final examination is undertaken during the last 18 months of the training year (OMS 3/OMS 4) and a
pass in this examination is mandatory for completion of the training program and award of Fellowship.
Trainees who are unsuccessful in examinations receive a report from the Registrar within five weeks
following the examination. The report comprises Examiner feedback with the aim of supporting the
candidate in further attempts.
For further information on examinations, please refer to: SST – C - Section 3. Final Examination – D -
Section 1.
Trainees must advise in writing the College office and the Director of Training for their region their
intention to withdraw from the program. There is no refund of fees.
For further information on re-applying to the training program after failing an examination, please refer
to the Former Trainees Seeking to Reapply to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Training Program
Guidelines.
3 A – SECTION 3
Collectively, these workplace assessments will provide evidence that a trainee is competent in the
practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Trainees are encouraged to try to spread assessments over the training period to ensure there is
adequate time to repeat assessments if development is required. By the end of training, each trainee
should have satisfactorily completed assessment forms for all areas listed. For those trainees who have
already started surgical training prior to the introduction of CTAs, the number of assessments required
will be proportionate to the remaining training period. In this case the Director of Training will determine
the number of assessments which need to be satisfactorily completed. To assist the trainee’s
development as a surgeon, the Director of Training, in conjunction with the Supervisor of Training, may
specify the assessment areas required or give a selection from which to choose.
The Case Presentation plus Discussion is an assessment used to facilitate the documenting of
presentations of cases by trainees. This activity happens throughout training but may not be conducted
in a way that provides systematic assessment and structured feedback. Case Presentation plus
Discussion will assess clinical decision making and the application and use of medical and dental
knowledge in relation to patient care for which the trainee has been responsible. It also facilitates the
discussion of the ethical and legal framework of practice and requires the trainees to discuss why they
acted as they did. Although the primary purpose is not medical record keeping, as the actual record is
the focus of the presentation and discussion, the Supervisor of Training can assess the record in this
instance. The presentation and discussion process should take 10-15 minutes, plus 5 minutes for
feedback.
By the end of training, each trainee must have completed satisfactorily Case Presentation and
Discussion Assessment forms for the following:
c. Formulate detailed differential diagnoses for lesions of the maxillofacial region using advanced
imaging techniques including intraoperative imaging
d. Manage, as part of a multidisciplinary team, pathology of the maxillofacial region, e.g. ORN,
vascular lesions
e. Management of surgical and non-surgical treatments for a patient with facial pain
f. Management of non-surgical treatment of TMJ disorders, e.g. dislocations of the jaw joint, internal
derangements, occlusal splints, exercises, physiotherapy, etc.
OR
Management of common intra operative complications of TMJ surgery
OR
Post-operative and continuing care of the patient with a TMJ disorder
Medical Record Keeping The record is legible, signed, dated and appropriate to the problem,
meaningful in relation to, and in sequence with, other entries. It
helps the next clinician to give effective and appropriate care.
Clinical Assessment Can demonstrate an understanding of the patient’s story and how,
through the use of further questions and an examination
appropriate to the clinical problem, a clinical assessment was made
from which further action was derived.
Investigation(s) Can discuss the rationale for the investigations and necessary
referrals. Shows understanding of why the diagnostic studies were
ordered/performed, including the risks and benefits and
relationship to the differential diagnosis.
Differential Diagnosis Can discuss the outcomes of investigations and explain the
formulation of a differential and then a final diagnosis.
Treatment Can discuss the rationale for the treatment, including the risks and
benefits.
Follow Up and Future Planning Can discuss the rationale for the formulation of the management
plan including follow up.
It is the trainee’s responsibility to initiate the assessment process with their Supervisor of Training or
Trainer. The trainee advises the Supervisor of Training or Trainer that a particular case provides an
opportunity for assessment, organises a mutually acceptable time for the assessment to take place, and
ensures that the appropriate assessment form is given to the Supervisor or Trainer for completion.
The trainee will have selected a case record from a patient they have seen recently, and in whose notes
they have made an entry. The presentation and discussion must start from, and be centred around, the
trainee’s own record in the notes.
In order to maximise the educational impact of this assessment, the Supervisor of Training or Trainer
and the trainee need to identify agreed strengths, areas for development and an action plan. This should
be done one on one in a suitable environment.
Once the assessment has been completed, the trainee must copy the completed form for the Supervisor
of Training and keep the original form in their Learning Portfolio. Trainees should retain originals of all
assessments in their Learning Portfolio. It is expected that each trainee’s Learning Portfolio will have
completed assessment forms which detail that development is required, followed by a satisfactorily
completed form which shows that, through experience, the trainee has achieved the standard required.
To monitor progress, when submitting the Six-Monthly Assessment form, trainees must submit any
satisfactory Case Presentation plus Discussion forms completed in that six (6) month period.
Trainees will be required to submit a minimum of one satisfactorily completed Case Presentation plus
Discussion form for each six (6) months of accredited OMS training. These forms must be included in
an application for Assessment of Eligibility for the Final Examination.
This assessment involves the observation of procedures performed by the trainee. The AOP is designed
to assess a trainee’s technical skills and their ability to safely and effectively perform appropriate surgical
procedures. The Supervisor of Training or Trainer will also be able to assess the trainee’s ability to adapt
their skills in the context of each patient, for each procedure. The AOP should not be completed
retrospectively.
The AOP has two principal components, one consisting of a series of competencies within six (6) core
domains. Most of the competencies are common to all procedures, but a relatively small number of
competencies within certain domains are very specific to the particular procedure in question. The
second part of the evaluation consists of a global assessment which is divided into four levels of overall
global rating, the highest of which is the ability to perform the procedure to a standard expected of a
specialist in practice.
The trainee is assessed as either achieving a satisfactory standard or development required on items
within the following areas:
a. Consent
b. Pre-operative Planning
c. Pre-operative Preparation
d. Exposure and Closure
e. Intra-operative technique
f. Post-operative management.
The AOP may also serve as a form of checklist for the trainee on the steps required for each procedure.
Either whole or part of a procedure is assessed and AOP assessment forms have been developed for
specific procedures. They can be located at Appendix 3-19.
By the end of training, each trainee should have satisfactorily completed AOP assessment forms for the
following:
a. The removal of an impacted tooth requiring raising a flap, bone removal, tooth division and elevation
and repair
b. Treatment requiring a hard tissue graft or flap from:
i. A local site
By the end of training, each trainee when possible should satisfactorily completed AOP assessment
forms for the following
k. Removal of submandibular gland.
To aid the trainee’s development, additional procedures may be recommended by the Supervisor of
Training.
It is the trainee’s responsibility to initiate the assessment process with their Supervisor of Training or
Trainer. The trainee advises the Supervisor of Training or Trainer that a particular case provides an
opportunity for assessment and ensures that the appropriate assessment form is given to the Supervisor
or Trainer for completion.
On most occasions the trainee’s Supervisor of Training will complete the assessment, but it is
anticipated that in any one training period, particularly for certain procedures, other surgical consultants
may be available depending on the trainee’s work pattern. The trainee must approach a Trainer
suggesting a case provides the opportunity for assessment. The procedure should be representative of
those the trainee would normally carry out at that level and should be one from the list of procedures
above.
The Supervisor of Training or Trainer should observe the trainee undertaking the agreed sections of the
AOP in the normal course of workplace activity (usually scrubbed). Given the priority of patient care, the
Trainer should choose the appropriate level of supervision depending on the trainee’s stage of training.
Trainees should carry out the procedure, explaining what they intend to do throughout. If the trainee is
in danger of harming the patient at any point s/he must be warned or stopped by the Trainer immediately.
Trainees will also find that reflecting on the assessment criteria (as detailed in the assessment form)
can help them define any gaps in their understanding or ability which they can bring to the discussion
with the Trainer and other senior colleagues.
As an entire collection, they form a summative assessment of the trainee’s competence in learning to
perform operative procedures using the correct protocols to the correct standards. Trainees are
encouraged to perform as many as possible.
When an AOP is completed, the Supervisor or Trainer should provide immediate feedback to the trainee
in a debriefing session. The assessor should identify areas of achievement and opportunities for
development. This should be done sensitively and in a suitable environment. The AOP will take as long
as the procedure itself but the completion of the form should take about 15 minutes including feedback
to the trainee.
Once the assessment has been completed, the trainee must copy the completed form for the Supervisor
of Training and keep the original form in their Learning Portfolio. Trainees should retain originals of all
assessments in their Learning Portfolio. It is expected that each trainee’s Learning Portfolio will have
completed assessment forms which detail that development is required, followed by a satisfactorily
completed form which shows that, through experience, the trainee has achieved the standard required.
To monitor progress, when submitting the Six-Monthly Formative Assessment form, trainees should
submit any satisfactory AOP forms completed in that six (6) month period to the College.
Trainees are required to submit a minimum of two satisfactorily completed Assessment of Operative
Process forms for each six (6) months of accredited OMS training. These forms must be included in an
application for Assessment of Eligibility for the Final Examination.
Trainees should complete one TAC assessment during their third year of surgical training
(OMS 3).
The TAC form is a peer assessment tool comprising a self-assessment by the trainee and the collated
ratings from a range of colleagues who work with the trainee (refer to Appendix 20 for an example of
the Rater form). As part of a multidisciplinary team, surgical trainees work with other people who have
complementary skills. They are expected to understand the range of roles and expertise of team
members in order to work effectively within that team. The TAC is used as an educational method of
assessing competence in professional skills within a team-working environment. Trainees should
complete one TAC assessment during the third year of their surgical training.
The assessment provides developmental feedback to the trainee in order to improve the trainee’s clinical
care and professional competence by directing learning and improving insight. Trainees are assessed
doing what is normally expected of them in their usual working environment. It is important that the
trainee selects different raters to cover a variety of perspectives.
The TAC assessment is confidential. Individual assessments are anonymised and are not disclosed to
the trainee. Feedback to the trainee is delivered through a report which is sent to the trainee, the
trainee’s Supervisor of Training and the Director of Training and comprises the raters’ aggregate ratings
compared with the trainee’s self-assessment, plus raters’ comments which are included verbatim.
The assessment should be held in approximately the fourth month of a six (6) month rotation, or the
eighth month of a 12-month rotation. This will give sufficient time for development, if required.
It is the trainee’s responsibility to initiate the assessment process with the Education Officer.
The trainee must select a minimum of eight (8) raters (maximum of 12) to assess them. The trainee then
must liaise with the OMS Education Officer to provide the list of names and email addresses of the
raters. The OMS Education Officer will provide a link to each of the assessors as well as a link for the
trainee, so they can complete a self-assessment. The raters should be members of the trainee’s
multidisciplinary healthcare team who represent a range of different grades and environments (e.g.
ward, theatre, outpatients) and who have sufficient expertise to be able to make an objective judgment
about the trainee’s performance. Raters do not include administrators, support staff or patients.
The assessment must be completed online and should only take 10-15 minutes to complete. Raters are
given a date (approximately one to two weeks after receiving the survey) by when the completed form
must be submitted. The data is collated, and the feedback will then be provided to the trainee and
Supervisor of Training in a report.
Once the results have been received the Supervisor of Training should sign off the TAC report by
selecting the appropriate outcome for the comments box: satisfactory, development required or
unsatisfactory. If development is required, a targeted training plan should be detailed in the comments
box. The re-assessment should take place when the Supervisor of Training indicates that progress has
been made in areas identified for development. Unsatisfactory reports should be referred to the Director
of Training.
Situations in which the TAC is deemed to be unsatisfactory are listed below with recommended actions.
a. The TAC was not carried out -
The TAC form cannot be signed off until completed. At the earliest opportunity the Supervisor of
Training and trainee must ascertain the reasons preventing the TAC from being carried out and
take any necessary action to resolve the difficulties so that the TAC can be completed within a
suitable period.
c. The feedback report showed that the trainee needed to improve performance
The trainee and Supervisor of Training develop a learning and development plan for improvement
including a timeframe for achieving this. The Supervisor of Training can recommend additional
training or support, such as mentoring or personal development activities. The Supervisor of
Training can also recommend a repeat of the TAC assessment. The repeat assessment could
occur in the following six (6) months under the supervision of the next Supervisor of Training.
Trainees will be required to submit one satisfactory Team Appraisal of Conduct. This assessment must
be included in the application for Assessment of Eligibility for the Final Examination.
4 A – SECTION 4
The Six-Monthly Assessment report form will not be considered valid unless it is signed by the trainee,
Supervisor of Training responsible for its completion, and the Director of Training.
The assessment relates to the trainee’s overall performance during the previous period and takes into
account all aspects including:
a. Clinical knowledge and skills
Clinical knowledge of subject, professional knowledge, clinical clerking, history taking, relevant
procedural skills
b. Clinical judgement
Diagnostic skills, patient management, time management, recognising limits, ethical skills
c. Communication
Communication skills, ability to communicate with patients and families, sensitivity and ethical
awareness
f. Reliability and dependability, ability to cope with stress, emotional demands, and emergency
situations and personal manner.
4.1.3 PROCESS
From 2007, each trainee must maintain a Learning Portfolio throughout their training. It should contain
originals or copies of formal documents related to training as well as a detailed logbook. It must contain
the original signed copy of each Six-Monthly Assessment Report form from each assessment with a
Supervisor of Training.
a. Formal assessment meetings should occur between the Supervisor of Training (SoT) and
each trainee at the beginning and end of each six (6) month period. At the beginning of the
rotation it is the trainee’s responsibility to show the Supervisor their learning portfolio including
copies of all previous assessments. The learning portfolio is to be used by the Supervisor and
trainee to set appropriate educational and clinical goals for the following rotation. For trainees
should arrange an interview with the SoT at three (3) monthly intervals during the rotation to
discuss progress to allow feedback and to identify any weaknesses or deficiencies during the
course of the clinical rotation.
The meeting at the end of the rotation is specifically to review and discuss performance of the
trainee in the completed rotation. Additional meetings between the trainee and the Supervisor
should occur as appropriate. Any trainee experiencing difficulty should bring this to the
attention of their Supervisor of Training as early as possible. If the trainee is continuing at the
same institution, with the same Supervisor for the following six (6) months, the assessment
and goal setting interviews may be joined.
b. The Six-Monthly Assessment report of the trainee over the previous rotation should be compiled
from the Supervisor’s own observations and from the feedback from the other Trainers and
consultants who have worked with the trainee during the six (6) month training period.
c. The Six-monthly Assessment report form must be signed by the Supervisor of Training and the
trainee, after the trainee has had the opportunity to add comments.
d. The following points may assist a Supervisor of Training in situations where the trainee’s
performance is not at the level indicative of satisfactory assessment:
ii. A consistent unsatisfactory attribute over more than one assessment or multiple
unsatisfactory attributes on the one occasion must be discussed with the trainee and,
together with the Director of Training, remedial strategies established.
e. Within four weeks of a completed assessment, the trainee should meet with the Director of
Training. The Director of Training will review the assessment and deem the report satisfactory,
borderline or unsatisfactory and sign the form. The trainee should keep the original copy of the
signed form in their learning portfolio and send a copy of the form to the College office. The
College office must receive a copy of the assessment report by the published date provided in
the Handbook each year. Failure to submit a Six-Month Formative Assessment Report within a
maximum of two (2) weeks of the published date will result in the period of training from that
time forward not being recognised until the report is submitted. Additional training time may be
required as a result of the deficit in accredited training time.
The Trainees Requiring Assistance Policy provides an overview to assist Directors of Training and
Supervisors of Training who are assisting a trainee requiring assistance.
In the event that the Supervisor of Training is seriously concerned about a trainee’s performance and
progress, a formal warning may be given to the trainee by the Director of Training, prior to the Six-
Monthly Formative Assessment. The trainee will be advised that improvement in performance and
progress will be expected in specified areas or an unsatisfactory Six-Monthly Assessment report may
result. This warning must be indicated on a Trainee Report form (refer to Appendix 22) and signed and
dated by the Director of Training and the trainee. A copy of the Trainee Report form should be filed in
the trainee’s Learning Portfolio and the original kept by the Director of Training.
Initial steps by the Director of Training (in consultation with the Supervisor of Training):
a. a formal time should be set aside for a discussion with advance notice for the trainee
f. assistance and resources available to the trainee should be identified and offered (this may
include assistance in identifying a mentor for advice or counselling from a professional counsellor)
g. a documented action plan including follow up meeting dates (with the Director and Supervisor of
Training) should be developed.
The Director of Training will meet with each trainee and consider their assessment report within four
weeks of the completion of the relevant six (6) month training period. The Director of Training, after
discussion with the relevant Supervisor of Training, must decide whether the report is deemed as
Satisfactory, Borderline or Unsatisfactory.
The Supervisor of Training and trainee are informed that the training is satisfactory
b. Borderline
The Director of Training advises the trainee of specific problems and makes recommendations for
improvements required. The Trainee Report Form, Appendix 22, is completed. The trainee should also
be informed of the potential consequences of the assessment of their next six (6) months of training:
• If the next Six-Monthly Assessment report is deemed as Satisfactory, then the Borderline six (6)
months will be deemed as Satisfactory.
• If the next Six-Monthly Assessment report is deemed as Borderline, then both assessments will be
deemed as Unsatisfactory and the training time for these 12 months will not be credited.
• If the next Six-Monthly Assessment is deemed Unsatisfactory, then the Borderline six (6) months
will be deemed Unsatisfactory and the training time for these 12 months will not be credited.
• Six (6) monthly training periods are regarded as continuous and they are not based on a calendar
year. A trainee who receives a Borderline Six-Monthly Assessment report for the second part of
one calendar year and for the first part of the following calendar year will have this training period
deemed Unsatisfactory.
• If a trainee receives a Borderline report following an Unsatisfactory report in the previous six (6)
months, then the Borderline report will be deemed Unsatisfactory and the training time for these 12
months will not be credited.
c. Unsatisfactory
If the Six-Monthly Assessment was unsatisfactory, the trainee will be notified in writing by the College
that this training period will not be credited.
Any Six-Monthly Assessment reports which are deemed as Borderline or Unsatisfactory should be
reported to the relevant Regional Surgical Committee at their next meeting and from the Director of
Training to the Training Committee, Board of Studies (BoS). The Training Committee will meet and
review every Borderline and Unsatisfactory report. Trainees will receive written correspondence from
the College following this.
If a trainee receives three (3) unsatisfactory Six-Monthly Assessment reports at any time during the
course of their training, then they will cease to be a trainee.
a. The Director of Training will discuss the assessment report with the relevant Supervisor of Training
c. Specific areas of concern will be identified and listed. Trainee Report Form (Appendix 22) is
completed.
b. The insight of the trainee and his/her willingness to modify their behaviour (e.g. accepting, keen to
improve on the unsatisfactory attribute or denial of the problem)
c. Factors such as personality differences with a staff member(s) or psychosocial stress which may
have influenced behaviour or affected performance
e. Whether the trainee is likely to improve his/her performance or whether he/she is at risk of ongoing
problems.
When a trainee performs at a standard which is below that to be acceptable for a developing oral and
maxillofacial surgeon, notwithstanding repeated documented attempts at remediation, the Director of
Training will notify the BoS. After ensuring that appropriate counselling and remedial measures have
occurred the BoS of the College may recommend any of the following options, depending on the nature
of the problem.
The processes of procedural fairness must be observed so that the trainee is notified of any steps being
taken. The Director of Training must advise the BoS of any action which may alter the training status of
the trainee. The trainee may appeal to the College against any decision that affects his/her training. The
College will consider this appeal according to its established procedures – Reconsideration, Review &
Appeals Policy.
If a trainee has three (3) Six-Monthly Assessments reports deemed Unsatisfactory, during the course of
his/her training, the trainee will cease to be a trainee.
If a trainee is dismissed or terminated from their hospital employment, they will be automatically
terminated from their accredited training position and the Training Program.
A former Trainee who has been terminated from the OMS Training Program for any reasons noted in
Appendix 30 (Section 3) and outlined below, will not be eligible to reapply for selection for OMS
Training in the future.
A former trainee who has been dismissed from the OMS training programme and/or an employing
institution due to the following reasons will not be granted permission to reapply for OMS training:
a. failure to complete the SST exam after 3 diets of the examination
b. unsatisfactory performance or formative report
c. failure to satisfy hospital employment requirements
d. unprofessional conduct, professional misconduct or notifiable conduct as
e. defined by the registering bodies for medicine and dentistry in Australia and New Zealand
5 A – SECTION 5
Applications for part-time or interrupted training may be approved in a range of circumstances, including
availability of accredited positions, research, ill-health or parenting.
As the College does not employ its trainees, the College can only mandate the approval of training which
will be accredited by the College. The specific part-time training arrangements must be documented and
supported in writing by the trainee’s Director of Training.
• Applications for part-time training must be made in writing in advance to the Registrar (OMS), for
consideration by the Board of Studies
• Trainees who are approved to undertake part-time training must have a clinical training commitment
of at least 50% of a full-time trainee in one calendar year
• Trainees who are approved to undertake part-time training must complete training within six (6)
years
• Trainees who are approved for part-time training must undertake the same training components as
full-time trainees
• Trainees who are approved for part-time training are required to submit logbook summary forms
and fulfil course requirements
• Trainees may apply to enter part-time training from a period of interrupted training
• Part-time training requires enrolment with the College and normal payment of the annual trainee
enrolment fee
• Where there are exceptional circumstances the BoS may approve an amended training program .
• Applications for interrupted training must be made in writing in advance to the Registrar (OMS) for
consideration by the Training Committee. Trainees are required to maintain enrolment during any
period of interrupted training. When the period of interrupted training is for up to 12 months, the full
annual trainee enrolment fee applies
• Where interrupted training extends for more than one (1) year, an administration fee is payable by
the trainee
• Trainees who are approved for interruption of training must complete training within six (6) years.
However, a period of continuous interruption of training exceeding two (2) years will necessitate a
period of additional training, due to loss of skills and rapid change in medical and dental knowledge
• During a period of interrupted training trainees cannot sit for examinations or participate in any part
of the program
• It is the responsibility of the trainee to re-enrol following a period of interrupted training
• Trainees may apply for part-time training after a period of interrupted training. Notwithstanding any
provision within this policy, where there are exceptional circumstances recognised and approved
by the BoS, the Training Committee may approve an amended training program
• Applications for delay in the planned commencement of training date must be made in
writing in advance to the Registrar (OMS) for consideration by the Training
Committee. Applications must fulfil one of the special circumstances outlined in the Special
Consideration in Assessment Policy.
• Applications should be made as soon as possible when a special circumstance is identified.
• Applications for interruption of training, to delay the commencement of training, will only be
considered for a period of up to 12-months.
• Applicants who are not able to commence training 12-months after the anticipated date will
be ineligible for any further extension of interrupted training under Special Consideration
and will need to apply for training via the Selection Process.
6 A – SECTION 6
All trainees are expected to maintain logbooks to demonstrate their clinical experience. These must be
maintained on a contemporaneous basis in the trainee’s Learning Portfolio and should be available for
review by the Supervisor of Training or Director of Training at any stage.
All logbooks are reviewed at least six (6) monthly by the Director of Training, and a summary is submitted
to the College on an annual basis (refer to Appendix 21 and 23). Logbooks are audited by the Training
Committee.
Generally, the expectation is that one would use the Hospital Identifier Label. Virtually all public and
private hospitals in Australia and New Zealand use these for inpatients. If these are not available for
outpatients or private room patients, write in the details.
• Gender
• Date of birth
• Supervisor of Training/Trainer/Consultant
• Date of Operation
For investigative procedures, use the date when completed. If a patient has two operations at different
times, then both are counted.
The basic unit of the logbook is the individual patient having an operation, not a series of procedures.
Thus, generally the operation will be covered by a single description in a single category. These
categories of operations used by the College for analysis are included for your guidance. However, the
operation must be described in writing not using your own interpretation of the description. There are
some defined exceptions to this:
a. When a graft is taken from a distant site (Category 15) and used as part of an orthognathic
(Category 8-10), pre-prosthetic (Category 6) or reconstruction (Category 13-14) operation.
b. When there is an extensive operation for removal of a pathology (Category 4-5) involving a graft
from a distant site (Category 15) as part of a reconstruction.
The details of the operation should be written using standard descriptive terms of what was done. Avoid
eponymous terms for operations.
6.1.2 ROLE
b. Assistant
Assisting another surgeon, either Trainer, consultant or trainee
Note: If a more experienced trainee is supervising another on how to perform a whole operation,
then the more experienced is the Assistant. If the more experienced trainee is doing the
procedure but supervising the junior in some part, then the junior is the Assistant.
A person who does not scrub or is not the first assistant should not claim to be an assistant on the case.
If a trainee has difficulties in applying these guidelines, or in the event of dispute between two trainees,
then the Supervisor of Training or Director of Training will arbitrate.
The following are included for guidance. The operation must be described in full in writing.
1. Dentoalveolar
2. Oral & Facial Infection
3. Facial Trauma
4. Pathology – benign
5. Pathology – malignant
6. Preprosthetic & adjunctive procedures
7. Implantology
8. Orthognathic – single jaw +/- genioplasty or SAME
9. Orthognathic – bimaxillary +/- genioplasty
10. Orthognathic – other
11. Temporomandibular Joint
12. Maxillary Sinus
13. Reconstructive – hard tissue
14. Reconstructive – soft tissue & composite
15. Reconstructive – graft harvest
16. Other procedures
Notes:
Preprosthetic & adjunctive implant procedures
The category includes procedures to facilitate the placement of prosthesis such as tori reduction,
reduction of tuberosity and sulcoplasty/vestibuloplasty. Adjunctive procedures relate to the procedures
performed to facilitate fixture placement with local augmentation, closed sinus lift, socket
augmentation procedures and soft tissue grafts (connective tissue grafts).
Other procedures
This category can include other procedures such as tracheostomy and the figures for each of these
should be recorded and listed separately under ‘other procedures’
Distraction procedures
Mid-facial, maxillary and mandibular distraction procedures should be recorded in 10. Orthognathic
other.
Orthognathic workup
Detailed clinical, cephalometric, photographic, model surgery, computer planning, medical and
psychosocial evaluation. Consultation with colleagues in orthodontics, speech pathology, etc.
A quick look at the models and the lateral ceph. radiograph is not an orthognathic workup.
Pathology, malignant
Detailed clinical, medical and psychosocial evaluation, imaging and pathologic studies. Consultation
with Head and Neck colleagues so that the malignancy is fully staged (TNM) and management planned.
Biopsy and referral is not a malignancy workup.
Temporomandibular joint
Detailed clinical, imaging, medical and psychosocial evaluation and consultations as appropriate.
Implementation of non-surgical management to resolution or surgery.
Oral medicine
Detailed clinical, medical and psychosocial evaluation, and appropriate pathologic investigation.
Consultations as appropriate and implementation of non-surgical management to control of the
condition.
1 B - SECTION 1
In accrediting training posts within institutions such as hospitals, oral health centres or private practices,
the College seeks to ensure that the institution and training post meet all the necessary accreditation
standards and criteria to allow both optimal delivery and reception of OMS education and training.
The College accredits training posts within institutions. Examples of institutions include a hospital, an
oral health centre or a private practice.
A Regional Training Centre is defined as a group of accredited training positions/posts. Each individual
accredited training post has an accreditation status (i.e. conditional or full). Ideally, all accredited training
posts within one Regional Training Centre would be reviewed at the same time.
An accreditation review of a Regional Training Centre must include the review of each individual post
(by site visit or detailed teleconference). A thorough accreditation review of a Regional Training Centre
will take approximately three hours per training post. Each individual accredited training post’s
performance is compared to the standards and criteria for oral and maxillofacial surgery (SCOMS – refer
Appendix 25).
An accreditation report is compiled for the Regional Training Centre and will include a section for each
accredited training post. The report for a Regional Training Centre is a combination of individual
reports/sections on each training post. The accreditation review team will provide recommendations for
each training post based on the post’s performance against SCOMS.
The Accreditation Standards and Criteria of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (SCOMS) have been set and
there are two types of criteria:
a. MUST (mandatory) – the Accreditation Committee consider it absolutely necessary that this
criterion be met if the training post is to be accredited
b. SHOULD (desirable) – the Accreditation Committee consider it highly desirable that this criterion
be met and will make a judgment as to whether or not its absence may compromise compliance
with all of the requirements for accreditation.
Mandatory standards are included as a guide to what the College considers to be a priority in order to
provide a safe, supportive and educational environment for trainees. If a training institution is unable to
meet one or more of the mandatory criteria, accreditation will not be withdrawn immediately however
the post will convert to Conditional Accreditation. If the training institution works with the College to
address the identified deficiencies and makes reasonable progress on these areas over time, conditional
accreditation will continue for the time period specified by the accreditation team or the post is reviewed.
Any mandatory criteria which are unmet will be identified and the institution will be given the opportunity
to meet the expected minimum.
The agreed process that will be followed if a criterion is identified as unmet is outlined below:
a. An agreement is negotiated with the institution to address the deficiencies identified.
b. Conditional accreditation status is conferred (with an appropriate timeframe to meet the criteria, as
negotiated, usually six (6) or 12 months).
Any desirable criteria which are unmet will be identified and the institution is expected to make
reasonable progress on such recommendations within the accreditation period.
b. Conditional Accreditation
Conditional accreditation will be granted to a post when the mandatory criteria have not all been
met but the accreditation team is satisfied that there is the potential for significant progress to be
made in that area within the next 12 months. The training institution would be required to report
progress within 12 months of the visit.
It is the responsibility of the Director of Training to notify the College of any significant change to a post
within the Regional Training Centre. This may be done via a supplementary Annual Survey. The College
will then determine if the post requires reassessment. The College will then write to the hospital and
confirm the information provided. The responsibility of the College is primarily towards the trainee and
their continuation of training.
If the post fails to qualify for any of the above levels, accreditation will be withdrawn.
Posts that receive full accreditation will be reviewed through the usual five (5) year accreditation cycle.
Posts that receive conditional accreditation will be reviewed at the appropriate 12-month stage.
The College reserves the right to request an accreditation review of a Regional Training Centre within
the five (5) year accreditation period.
Application for accreditation of all new and potential training posts must occur before an accredited
trainee can occupy the post. The process for application is as follows:
a. The Director of Training, in conjunction with the Regional Surgical Committee, writes to the
Accreditation Committee with notification that a new training post is being offered.
b. The proposed Supervisor of Training completes the Application for Accreditation of an additional
or new OMS Training Post.
c. The Accreditation Committee reviews the documentation and requests any additional information
that may be required.
d. The application is considered by the Accreditation Committee. The Supervisor of Training and the
hospital are notified that Committee meetings are usually held three (3) to four (4) times a year.
Completed applications should be received at least four (4) weeks prior to a meeting. The
Accreditation Committee considers the application and nominates a review team at the meeting.
The review team is responsible for the preparation of a teleconference review of the post. If the
post is in a hospital which does not have an accredited training post, a site visit may be warranted.
If the application is for an additional post at an institution which already has an RACDS accredited
post, a subcommittee/review team needs to review the details for all posts accredited at the hospital
to ensure the new training post does not dilute the training experience of others.
e. The Accreditation Committee makes a final decision about the accreditation status of the post
based on recommendations from the review team. The Board of Studies and College Board are
informed.
Once full accreditation status has been achieved by a post, it will enter onto that training centre’s review cycle.
This section describes the process involved in the accreditation of a Regional Training Centre. The
Accreditation Committee aims to conduct a thorough and efficient review of each post during the
accreditation review. The process is defined below:
a. The Regional Surgical Committee is notified by the College at least six (6) months prior to an
accreditation review. The Chair of the Accreditation Committee through the Education Officer will
write to the Director of Training and Chair of the Regional Surgical Committee proposing three
dates for the visit to occur. The Training Centre will be advised of the approximate length of the
visit, and it will be requested that the finalised date is communicated to the College no less than
three (3) months prior to the visit.
c. The College forwards to the Supervisor of Training of the institution a pre-visit accreditation survey
and draft itinerary which is to be completed and returned within four (4) to six (6) weeks.
d. The accreditation review team reviews the returned surveys and identifies any outstanding
information that may be required prior to the visit. In conjunction with the College the review team
will finalise a site visit program with the Director of Training and Chair, Regional Surgical Committee
e. A letter is sent to each institution’s Supervisor of Training & Head of Unit or Section detailing when
their post will be reviewed and with whom the accreditation team would like an interview, including
medical / surgical administration.
f. A visit timetable is prepared by the OMS Education Officer in consultation with the Director of
Training, the Chair of the Regional Surgical Committee and the Supervisor of Training for each
post. At the time of the visit it is the responsibility of the Supervisor of Training to ensure that
incumbent trainees are available for interviewing and that up to date learning portfolios and logbook
summaries are available. The Supervisor of Training is responsible for contacting and confirming
the appointments for all of the relevant stakeholders for their hospital visit. The final agreed
timetable is then confirmed with the Director of Training, Chair of the Regional Surgical Committee
and Supervisor of Training.
g. The Accreditation Review team conducts a pre-visit teleconference to identify any areas of concern
based on the pre-visit survey. All timetables and travel will be confirmed at the same meeting. The
Chair of the Accreditation Committee will participate in this teleconference.
The Accreditation Review team retains the right to visit any and all sites involved in OMS training. The
purpose of site visits is to allow both the training institutions and the review team to confirm the
information provided in the pre-visit survey (Appendix 26) and to allow the hospital to provide any
outstanding information or address any queries based on the available documents.
Site visits will usually consist of multiple interviews with significant stakeholders involved in the provision
of training. The Supervisor of Training for each hospital will arrange the meeting room, A-V requirements
and any catering that is required during the course of the Accreditors visit to the hospital.
The cost of accreditation site visit for the review team will be paid by the College.
Each post will take approximately three hours to review thoroughly. There will be an adequate time
allowed for travel between each hospital if possible, for the review team to consolidate findings following
each hospital site visit.
1.1.9 ALLOCATION
a. Where there are suitable candidates who meet the minimum criteria for selection the College
will appoint trainees to fill available posts.
b. Another Fellow – This individual should have experience in supervision and training, and preferably
be a Supervisor of Training.
c. A senior staff member from the RACDS – Education and Training, such as the Education Officer
All members of the accreditation team are to be fully trained to ensure the consistency of process
including interview questions.
Position descriptions for Accreditors will also be developed including information regarding conflict of
interest and confidentiality.
The provision and review of reports will follow the following process:
a. The accreditation review team prepares a draft Preliminary Report for the Accreditation Committee.
This report should be available within six (6) weeks. Provision of three (3) hours should be allowed
for at the end of the accreditation visit for the review team to begin the draft report. The Preliminary
Report should include (in appendix form) copies of the pre-visit surveys, trainee logbooks, trainee
timetables and educational logs for each post.
b. A copy of the draft Preliminary Report is distributed to members of the Accreditation Committee
and discussed at the next Accreditation Committee meeting.
c. The OMS Education Officer on the direction of the Chair of the Accreditation Committee distributes
copies of the Preliminary Report to the Director of Training, Chair of the Regional Surgical
Committee and the Director of Surgery/Director of Medical Services or equivalent of the relevant
institution for factual accuracy and comment. All comments must be received in writing within three
(3) weeks to be considered.
d. The Accreditation Committee considers comments and the report is amended and approved as the
Final Report.
e. The amended and approved Final Report is sent for ratification by the Board of Studies, OMS and
noted by Council
f. The commencement date of the accreditation period will be the date that the Final Report is ratified
by the Board of Studies, OMS.
g. A copy of the ratified Final Report will be distributed to all relevant parties.
The College reserves the right to request an accreditation review of a training post within the five (5)
year accreditation period. Such a review may be initiated after advice from the institution or Regional
Surgical Committee that a significant change to the quality of training has occurred. A complaint from a
Fellow or Trainee, for example, may also precipitate the need for a review of a training post/s.
Accreditation status of a training post may be altered if the training post no longer meets the accreditation
standards and criteria. The College will work with a training institution to make the required
improvements in a realistic timeframe. The College would also be available to support training
institutions in negotiations with jurisdictions. Full Accreditation status would be withdrawn only if the
training post failed to meet mandatory accreditation criteria and negotiations with the institution involved
consistently fail to produce a workable outcome.
In view of the seriousness of withdrawing accreditation of a training post, the final decision on taking
such action will be made by the CEO, the Chair of the Board of Studies and the Chair of the Accreditation
Committee in close consultation with the relevant review team and the relevant Regional Surgical
Committee.
If possible, an institution with an accredited training post should notify the College when there will be, or
if there has been, any significant change to the way in which education and/or training is delivered or
monitored. This is particularly the case if the change affects the institution meeting accreditation
standards and criteria as published in Standards and Criteria for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
(SCOMS).
With the exception of appeals concerning trainees who have been adversely affected (see below), only
appeals that are based on errors in process will be considered. Complaints must be lodged with the
CEO of the College in line with the College Complaints Policy. The complaints will be reviewed by a
constituted College Appeals Committee. Such application shall be in writing and accompanied by all
relevant information or grounds upon which the person seeks to rely in respect of the review.
If a trainee has been adversely affected by a decision which has not been resolved through
Reconsideration or Review, within 30 days of notification of the outcome of a request for Review, then
he or she may lodge an appeal with the CEO in line with the RACDS Reconsideration, Review and
Appeals Policy. Such application shall be in writing and accompanied by all relevant information or
grounds upon which the person seeks to rely in respect of the review.
The Accreditation Policies and Process will be reviewed every five (5) years or as required.
2 B - SECTION 2
Training centres and training posts are accredited to ensure provision of training of the highest standard.
Accreditation requirements include ensuring an administrative process which is dedicated to education
and provides for involvement of the teaching faculty and the Regional Surgical Committee in program
planning, review and evaluation on a regular basis.
2.1.2 TRAINING
While acknowledging that training is provided through service, the College requires that there must be
an appropriate balance between training and service commitments in training posts. Research is an
essential part of the education process.
The recognition of the OMS training program, training centre and training posts within the administrative
structure of the hospitals involved in training should be consistent with that of training programs of other
surgical specialties.
The Director of Training of the training centre should have the appropriate authority, responsibility and
privileges within the overall medical and surgical administrative structures of the institutions involved
with training.
Each accredited training centre must have a Director of Training. The Director of Training must be an
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, holding the FRACDS(OMS) or equivalent qualification acceptable to the
BoS, a Consultant involved in training in an accredited hospital and be a member of the Regional
Surgical Committee. The Regional Surgical Committee recommends a Director of Training to the Board
of Studies for appointment.
The Director of Training must have sufficient authority and time to fulfil administrative and teaching
responsibilities in order to achieve the educational goals of the training program. In addition, it is the
Director of Training’s responsibility to ensure that trainees completing the program, through the regional
training centre they are responsible for, have achieved the standards of performance necessary for them
to proceed to the Final Examination.
The Director of Training has the following responsibilities in conjunction with the Regional Surgical
Committee:
a. Appointment of College selected trainees for training posts in accordance with the policies
determined by the appointing bodies and by the College
c. Regular review of the training program within the training centre in order to evaluate the quality of
the educational experience obtained by the trainees and to ensure that the resources available for
training are being used effectively
i. To be familiar with the College’s guidelines and regulations on eligibility assessment, registration
of trainees, training and examinations
j. To notify the Education Officer of any changes created by trainees joining or leaving the rotational
training scheme during the hospital employment year. It is particularly important that the date of
such changes is noted to allow verification of training
k. To notify the Education Officer of any senior staffing or workload changes likely to impact on the
training programs of trainees and to provide required information as requested
l. To advise the Accreditation Committee if there are any significant changes in any hospital within
the training centre such that it may no longer be suitable for training
m. To advise potential and current registered trainees on their training, registration requirements, fee
payments and examination preparation
n. To monitor supervision, experience and fair allocation of duties for trainees and to facilitate such
changes as may be necessary
o. Trainee Assessment: -
i. In the event that a Supervisor of Training raises concerns about a trainee’s performance
and progress, it is essential that the trainee is advised of this, and if required, a formal
warning is given to the trainee by the Director of Training. The Trainees Requiring
Assistance Policy provides guidelines for the DoT and RSC on this. The trainee must be
advised that improvement in performance and progress will be expected in specified
areas or an unsatisfactory Six-Monthly Report may result. This warning must be indicated
on the Trainee Report form (refer to Appendix 22) and signed and dated by the Director of
Training and the trainee.
The warning should be accompanied by a written remedial plan prepared by the
Supervisor of Training and the trainee, which clearly identifies the areas of concern and
what the trainee needs to do to improve. This plan should be noted on the form or
attached to it.
ii. Review and signing of Six-Monthly Formative Assessment Reports. The Director of
Training should deem each assessment report as Satisfactory, Borderline or
Unsatisfactory. All assessment reports deemed as Borderline or Unsatisfactory should be
reported to the Regional Surgical Committee at the next meeting.
iii. To review and sign off each trainee’s learning portfolio.
p. To liaise with the relevant persons, particularly the Supervisors of Training, within the hospitals
comprising the training centre, to ensure that the training program is being implemented and
supported appropriately.
The Director of Training may also assume the Supervisor of Training role at the hospital within which he
or she is located.
Each accredited training centre must have an elected Chair of the Regional Surgical Committee (RSC).
The Chair of the RSC must be an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, holding the FRACDS(OMS) or
equivalent qualification acceptable to the BoS, a Consultant involved in training in an accredited hospital
and member of the Regional Surgical Committee. The DoT may also hold the position of Chair of the
RSC.
The Chair of the RSC has the following responsibilities in conjunction with the Regional Surgical
Committee:
a. To be familiar with the Handbook for Education and Training in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, and
the College guidelines and regulations
b. Provide support to the Director of Training in their role and responsibilities, which are outlined in
Part B - Section 2 of the Handbook
c. Assist in the preparation and conduct of an Accreditation visit to the Training Centre
d. To conduct regular meetings of the Regional Surgical Committee and ensure minutes are
recorded
The Supervisors of Training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery shall be nominated by the Regional
Surgical Committee and hold the FRACDS(OMS) or an equivalent qualification acceptable to the Board
of Studies. In hospitals with larger numbers of trainees, the Board of Studies may approve more than
one Supervisor of Training. Where possible there should be one Supervisor of Training for up to four
trainees and two Supervisors of Training for up to seven trainees.
Responsibilities include:
a. To provide support to trainees and ensure hands-on supervision and training. This supervision
must include:
b. Co-ordination of training within the hospital to ensure that each trainee obtains experience and
responsibility appropriate to their level of training and accesses the opportunities available within
the hospital.
i. It is advised that Supervisors of Training have a confidential face-to-face discussion with the
trainee about his/her performance and progress every three (3) months. The Director of
Training should be notified if there are concerns about a trainee’s performance and progress
so that a formal warning may be given prior to the six (6) monthly assessment. In this
instance, the Supervisor of Training may need to liaise with the Director of Training and
trainee to develop a remedial program.
ii. The Six-Monthly Formative Assessment report should be compiled from the supervisor’s
own observations and feedback from consultants who have worked with the trainee during
the six (6) month training period.
between the Supervisor of Training and the trainee about his/her performance and
progress.
If the Six-Monthly Formative Assessment report is other than satisfactory – the Supervisor
of Training should contact the Director of Training to discuss possible remedial strategies.
The Director of Training will decide whether the report should be Satisfactory, Borderline or
Unsatisfactory – in consultation with the Supervisor of Training.
d. To review and sign each trainee’s Logbook every three (3) months to ensure accuracy.
e. To liaise closely with the Director of Training and/or Regional Surgical Committee Chair (including
attending Regional Surgical Committee meetings when required) in order to discuss training
issues and problems, particularly where the hospital is having difficulty providing trainees with the
clinical experience and support outlined in College regulations.
Instruction and supervision within the OMS specialty must be conducted by fully qualified and registered
specialists (OMS or related specialties).
The number and time commitment of teaching staff should be sufficient to ensure:
a. The supervision of trainees at all times
c. Review, with trainees, of patient evaluation, treatment planning, management, complications and
outcomes of all their cases
f. Trainees are granted surgical privileges commensurate with their level of training and clinical skills.
c. The authorising surgeon shall remain readily available for attendance if necessary
d. When consultation is necessary with another surgeon the matter is referred back to the authorising
surgeon.
3 B - SECTION 3
For each Training Centre there is a Regional Surgical Committee. Membership of the RSC shall consist
of the Director of Training, Chair of the RSC, Heads of Unit and representatives from the Training
Hospitals, Supervisors of Training, persons providing academic & surgical input in the accredited posts
as well as a trainee representative, as outlined in 3.1.1. The RSC reports to the Board of Studies – Oral
& Maxillofacial Surgery.
The RSC is convened locally and chaired by a member of the Committee. When possible the DoT and
Chair roles should be undertaken by different Consultants. The Committee will meet at least (4) times
per year. The minutes of the meetings are to be ratified at the following meeting. The minutes must be
submitted to the College and the minutes or reports from the RSC are provided for the Board of Studies
meetings.
1.1 One elected Director of Training (DoT) Member (1) – this member will be elected by the
RSC. They do not have to be a Supervisor of Training or a Head of Department at the
time of election or during their tenure.
1.2 One elected Chair of the Regional Surgical Committee (1) – this member will be elected
by the RSC. They do not have to be a Supervisor of Training or a Head of Department
at the time of election or during their tenure.
1.3 Head of Department (Section or Unit) Members– one member from each of the training
campuses.
1.4 Regional Supervisors of Training– one or more members from each of the training
campuses. These members will be the Supervisors of Training and/or other nominated
Trainers at the training campuses.
1.5 In the event that there becomes another campus that provides training, distinct from the
current campuses, that campus will be entitled to a Supervisor of training member, and
a Head of Department member, in addition to those members listed above.
1.6 In the event one of the appointed members is elected to be the Head of Training, the
resident Campus may nominate a replacement delegate to fulfil the term of the
incumbent.
2 Tenure
2.1 All members shall be appointed for five (5) years. A member is eligible for re-
appointment, up to maximum of four (4) continuous terms.
2.2 The Director of Training shall be elected for a period of three (3) years. The Director of
Training is eligible for re-election, up to a maximum of three (3) continuous terms.
2.3 The Chair of the Regional Surgical Committee shall be elected for a period of three (3)
years. The Chair is eligible for re-election, up to a maximum of three (3) continuous
terms.
Following the notification of suspension from the RSC, the Member of the RSC will no
longer attend meetings of the RSC and will have the opportunity to make a submission
to the RSC in this regard within 14 days. The RSC may choose to appoint an interim
Member of the RSC for the duration of the suspension.
Following this, the Chair of the RSC will formally notify the Board of Studies. The Board
of Studies will make the final decision on the outcome and notify the RSC and the
Member of the RSC.
This will be initiated by the Chair of the RSC through an internal vote, and the affected
DoT will be notified of the outcome of the vote within 14 days. Following the notification
of intention of replacement, the DoT will have the opportunity to make a submission to
the RSC in this regard within 14 days.
Following this, the Chair of the RSC will formally notify the Board of Studies. The Board
of Studies will make the final decision on the outcome and notify the RSC and the DoT.
This will be initiated through an internal vote of the RSC membership, and the affected
Chair will be notified of the outcome of the vote within 14 days. Following the
notification of intention of replacement, the Chair will have the opportunity to make a
submission to the RSC in this regard within 14 days.
Following this, the RSC DoT will formally notify the Board of Studies. The Board of
Studies will make the final decision on the outcome and notify the RSC and the Chair.
3 Eligibility
3.1 To be eligible to be a member of the RSC, the member must be a registered Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgeon.
4 Voting
4.2 The Director of Training may vote on all matters with one (1) vote; except for the
election of the DoT.
4.3 The Chair (if not also the DoT) may vote on all matters with one (1) vote; except for the
election of the Chair
In the event a member from the Training Campus cannot attend a vote, another member may cast a
vote on their behalf, if in possession of a signed proxy.
5 Election
An election shall be held every three (3) years (or earlier if the Director of Training or Chair of
the RSC resigns).
5.1 Three (3) months prior to the election a call for nominations should be distributed. Any
person involved in training and eligible to be on the RSC may nominate, with a
seconder who is also eligible to be a member of the RSC. Nominations should be
addressed to the Chair of the RSC.
5.2 Two (2) weeks prior to the election meeting the Chairperson will distribute the
nominee’s details to the RSC
5.3 At the election meeting, the Chairperson shall conduct an anonymous written ballot
following the guidelines for voting.
5.4 The Chairperson shall inform the nominees of the outcome the same day.
5.5 In the event the DoT or Chair of the RSC becoming ineligible to be a member of the
RSC, a new Election will be held
1 C - SECTION 1
1.1.1 INTRODUCTION
The Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons (the College) through its Board of Studies in Oral
and Maxillofacial Surgery (the Board) is committed to providing a postgraduate specialist training
program in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) which is of an international standard and produces
specialist practitioners with a high level of knowledge and advanced clinical skills and attitudes in the
specialty in order to provide the best quality and service to the communities of Australia and New
Zealand.
The Board and the College have adopted the international definition for the scope of practice in Oral
and Maxillofacial Surgery.
The structured training program includes basic and advanced surgical training. It is predicated on
trainees undertaking surgery with increasing levels of independence and incremental complexity. The
Surgical Science and Training Examination in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (SST), is conducted within
the first year of OMS training. A pass in the SST examination is required before entering the second
year of training. The overall training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is completed under the supervision
of trained Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and other surgical consultants where rotations in other
disciplines are required, such as the year in Surgery in General. The College program establishes a
common standard across Australia and New Zealand through regional training centres which operate in
a consistent manner based on bi-nationally agreed requirements and protocols, which are centrally
regulated and accredited through the Board. All trainees must complete clinical training assessments
and a common final examination which is centrally conducted and leads to the award of Fellowship in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, FRACDS(OMS).
The overall structure of the curriculum is demonstrated in the following flow chart:
Curriculum Module
Clinical Education (x16) Clinical Training
Planned learning experiences in Exposure to re-occurring events within
regional training centre the hospital environment and
supervised experience
• Acquisition of • Application of
knowledge knowledge
• Development of • Technical skills
technical skills • Case management
• Theoretical skills
understanding of • Risk minimisation /
managing patients contingency
Delivery through • Research management skills Delivery through
demonstrations, • CPD • Professional role as registrar
tutorials, etc. behaviour / skills and learning from
Self-directed immediate
learning through supervisor
literature reviews,
web cases, etc.
FINAL EXAMINATION
As can be seen in this chart, the teaching of the curriculum can be divided into two distinct areas, clinical
education and clinical training.
Evidence of completion will be determined by portfolio reviews and checks, literature reviews and the
trainees’ log of web-based cases.
Clinical training is delivered by supervised training in teaching hospitals associated with the regional
centres and relevant university departments. Training posts are accredited by the College for this
purpose. The application of knowledge and technical skills are passed on by teachers and mentors who
are skilled in their specialty and are able to deliver this training in a timely and expert way.
Case management and risk management skills are learned in this setting along with professional skills
which are passed on through registrar teaching and supervised training.
Evidence of training is assessed by portfolio and logbook review and by the various clinical assessment
tools used by the College.
The broad philosophy of the Board and the College in its approach to OMS education and training is
based on the following interlinking beliefs and values:
1.1.2.1. Curriculum through which the elements of teaching and learning are translated into practices
which:
a. encompass everything that a trainee experiences
b. provides a rich learning resource, and
c. are open to interpretation and understanding.
1.1.2.2 A system of adult learning and a commitment to lifelong learning in which it is acknowledged
that trainees
a. take responsibility for their own decisions
b. need to know why they should learn
c. learn experientially, and
d. learn at the time which is most appropriate for them, their context and the kind of
learning required.
1.1.2.3 A structured model for training during which a trainee learns skills from a consultant in order
to undertake surgery with increasing independence and incremental complexity which in turn
provides the best environment for –
a. modelling of the art, craft and science of surgery
b. integration of theoretical and practical knowledge, and
c. development of necessary skills, attitudes and ethical approaches.
The broad goals of the training program in OMS are to ensure that all candidates who are awarded the
FRACDS (OMS) qualification:
These attributes are essential to providing the highest possible quality of service to meet the relevant
health care needs of the communities in Australia and New Zealand.
In order to fulfil these goals, the Board and the College have identified a number of broad competencies
for OMS, which are based on the CanMEDS 1 competencies. To encompass the full spectrum of the
profession two further competencies have been added; they are Technical Expert and Clinical Decision
Maker.
1.1.4.2 Communicator
a. Establish professional therapeutic relationships with patients and their families
b. Elicit and synthesize accurate and relevant information, incorporating the perspectives of
patients and their families
c. Share health care information and plans for patients and their families
d. Engage patients and their families in developing plans that reflect the patient’s health care
needs and goals
e. Document and share written and electronic information about the medical encounter to
optimise clinical decision-making, patient safety, confidentiality, and privacy
1.1.4.3 Collaborator
a. Work effectively with physicians and other colleagues in the health care professions
b. Work with physicians and other colleagues in the health care professions to promote
understanding, manage differences, and resolve conflicts
c. Hand over the care of a patient to another health care professional to facilitate continuity of
safe patient care
1.1.4.4 Leader
a. Contribute to the improvement of health care delivery in teams, organizations, and systems
1Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J editors. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa:
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015
http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/bestpractices/framework_e.pdf
1.1.4.6 Scholar
a. Engage in the continuous enhancement of their professional activities through ongoing
learning
b. Teach students, residents, the public and other health care professionals
c. Integrate best available evidence into practice
d. Contribute to the creation and dissemination of knowledge and practices applicable to health
1.1.4.7 Professional
a. Demonstrate a commitment to patients by applying best practices and adhering to high ethical
standards
b. Demonstrate a commitment to society by recognizing and responding to societal expectations
in health care
c. Demonstrate a commitment to the profession by adhering to standards and participating in
physician-led regulation
d. Demonstrate a commitment to physician health and well-being to foster optimal patient care
In order to acquire these broad competencies, trainees are provided with the opportunity to understand
both the scientific basis of OMS, through the teaching of the modular curriculum, and the opportunity to
apply this understanding in the clinical environment.
The learning outcomes are delivered through a number of learning methods including structured
educational programs, skills courses, self-directed learning and workplace hands on teaching by
specialist surgeons. This occurs in the various centres which have been accredited for this purpose.
1.1.5 CURRICULUM
1.1.5.1 The curriculum in OMS is designed to bring all of the competencies and elements of training
together in order to produce a well-trained consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon capable
of independent practice.
1.1.5.2 The central part of the curriculum are the modules which are both self-contained and, when
combined, define the domains of learning which are required of a qualified Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgeon with the FRACDS (OMS). They have been designed in this way to
complement the asynchronous nature of a trainee's experience.
1.1.5.3 The learning of these components is embedded in the trainees' experiences during their
hospital rotations, planned learning sessions (in the form of lectures and/or tutorials, group
discussion, structured experiences, etc.) and self-directed learning (in the form of reading,
literature reviews, case studies, etc.).
1.1.5.4 There will be a balance of inpatient and outpatient, adult and paediatric cases during
clinical training.
1.1.5.5 To be eligible for the award of the Fellowship, trainees are required to have completed an
approved research study. The completion of a higher degree would fulfil the research
requirements.
The College will accept as fulfilment of this requirement either a formal research project
undertaken as part of a postgraduate research qualification or through the completion of a
research project and a paper that is deemed acceptable for publication in a peer reviewed
journal.
Trainees who choose to fulfil this requirement by enrolling in a PhD will be required to take
leave of absence from the training course.
Clinical case reports and stand-alone literature reviews will not be approved for this
purpose.
a. present a paper each year at a scientific meeting, the annual conference of the
specialty, a hospital grand round, or equivalent; and
b. present a paper at the annual conference of the specialty at least once during their
advanced surgical training.
1.1.5.6 Clinical training always includes a balance between education and service and as such
trainees will progress through each module at varying rates. Due to this the completion of
each module will occur at different times in the training sequence for each trainee, however,
all trainees will complete the required competencies for each module by the end of their
training.
1.1.5.7 Attainment of competencies will be assessed by formal clinical training assessment through
regional training centres and by the final examination at a bi-national level.
1.1.5.8 Trainees will complete all modules in the desired time frame. It will be necessary for each
trainee to keep a learning portfolio which will be assessed on a regular basis.
1.1.5.9 The learning portfolio will encourage trainees to monitor their own progress in their
development of the competencies as defined in the curriculum. Checks for the various clinical
training assessments will be conducted and all assessments must be contained within the
portfolio. The portfolio will be reviewed regularly and will be used to assist directors of training
with any remedial teaching a trainee may require.
The Surgical Science and Training Examination in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (SST) is to be
completed by the end of the first year of training and is included as part of the requirements for all of the
modules in the Curriculum.
The scope of specialist practice in OMS has been distilled into modules which are competency based.
The curriculum allows stair-cased progression through each of the 16 modules as knowledge and
surgical skills are acquired by the trainee. Modules are not recommended in any particular order and
this is in keeping with the curriculum frameworks of OMS programs internationally. This is also in line
with other Australian specialist medical colleges which rely on trainees completing clinical training within
the hospital environment for the attainment of these competencies.
The 16 modules which must be completed in order to meet the requirements of the FRACDS (OMS) are
below. They are presented in full in Part C - Section 3.
1.1.6.2 Learning Opportunities and Methods have been identified and relate specifically to the type
of competency listed in the curriculum. The knowledge and skills acquired through these
activities are all likely to be assessed in the Examination.
The checklists correspond with the requirements of the modules and are to be checked off
on a regular basis in order to determine the progress of the trainee through the program. In
this way any inconsistencies and problems can be determined and remedial exercises
introduced as required.
By the end of training each trainee will have checked off all of the required tasks.
b. Logbook
Trainees are exposed to practical experience in a variety of procedures and will progress
through the role of “assistant” to “surgeon”. This progression commences initially under the
supervision of the consulting surgeon and then through performing the operation on their
own. The Logbook is used to determine the number of surgical cases the trainee has
performed alone or as an assistant or observer.
Logbooks are also used to determine the spread of the trainee’s surgical scope and
competence to perform various procedures. This is coupled with the AOP assessments of
technical competence. The numbers associated with the Logbook encounters listed in the
various modules refer to the groups of procedures within the logbook itself.
i. Literature Reviews: topics are offered and suggested in each module. They will be
discussed in various different ways, for example in mini seminars
ii. Case Studies: are suitable for presentation from time to time during seminars and tutorials
iii. Essays: develop skills in information gathering and writing which form the basis for the
written papers during the examinations
d. Teaching Methods
A number of instructional techniques appropriate for each category of learning (acquiring
knowledge, cognitive skills, psychomotor skills and changing and/or improving attitudes) are
included. A variety of techniques, such as lectures, tutorials, and demonstrations with guided
observation, ensures that the different trainee learning styles are catered for.
1.1.6.3 Resources
Textbooks, journals and specific articles have been listed. These lists are regularly reviewed to ensure
currency, and include some older seminal articles, which continue to be relevant and remain as stable
references. Library access is important, as are the electronic forms of information such as the internet.
1.1.6.4 Assessments
a. The assessment of basic surgical science and training is completed once a trainee has
passed the SST examination and completed the mandatory course requirements.
b. Clinical training assessments of the remaining modules are included at the end of each
module and indicate the assessment for this stage of a trainee’s program, however, these
assessments could be completed before or after this time (depending on the ability of the
trainee during the latter years in the training program and the posts a trainee has
occupied). For example, if a trainee occupies an OMS training post at a children’s
hospital early in their training program they may be more advanced on competencies
from the Paediatric OMS module while in OMS 3, as compared to a trainee who has not
occupied a post within a children’s hospital until OMS 3.
The Assessment of Operative Process (AOP) is designed to assess the technical and
procedural skills of the trainees to perform a specific task or operation. The selected
AOPs are specific procedures which are considered to be the minimum key procedures
which trainees are required to achieve through OMS 2, 3 and 4.
The SST Examination, Team Appraisal of Conduct (TAC) and the Final Examination are
included in all module assessment criteria.
c. Once the trainee has completed these experiences their portfolio and Logbook are
assessed by the Trainee Advisory Committee and if satisfactory they are then able to
proceed to examination leading to FRACDS (OMS).
2 C – SECTION 2
This chart shows the broad competences mapped out and coupled with the modules in which they are found, and the assessments used to determine
that the competencies have been achieved.
Throughout this document the CanMed competencies have been followd, the mapping below maps the curriculum with those Entry Level Competencies
adopted by the DBA/DCNZ in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
The following MAP refers to the advanced training modules. The SST has a separate syllabus and must be completed with a satisfactory pass at the
SST examination, by the end of the first year of training.
Key:
CP & D – Case Presentation plus Discussion
AOP – Assessment of Operative Process
TAC – Team Appraisal of Conduct
Exam – Surgical Science and Training (SST) Examination and/or Final Examination
Select appropriate investigative methods and monitoring techniques in Module 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 4(G)d, 4(G)e, 5(G)a
a resource-effective, and ethical manner 14, 16
Recognise the most common disorders and differentiate those Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 4(G)e, 4(S)f, 4(S)a
amenable to operative and non-operative treatment 11, 12, 13, 14
Demonstrate effective clinical problem solving and judgment to Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, CP & D Domain 4(S)a,
address patient problems, including interpreting the available data and 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 4(S)f, 5(G)a, 5(G)b.
integrating information to generate differential diagnoses and
management plans
Accurately identify the risks, benefits, and mechanisms of action of Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Exam 4(S)i
currently used drugs 12, 13, 14
Apply preventative and therapeutic interventions in an effective and Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, CP & D 5(G)c
timely manner 12, 13, 14, 16 TAC
Identify risk and, where necessary, plan a risk management strategy Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, CP & D 5(G)a. 5(G)b
12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Effectively manage complications of operative procedures and the Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, CP & D 5(G)c
underlying disease process 14, 16
Ensure adequate follow up is arranged for procedures performed Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, CP & D 5(G)a. 5(G)b
11, 12, 13, 14
Effectively and appropriately prioritises professional duties when faced Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, CP & D 5(G)b
with multiple patients and/or problems 11, 12, 13, 14,
Technical Expert
Safely and effectively perform appropriate surgical procedures Module 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 10, 11, 12, AOP 4(G)b, 4(G)c, 5(S)
13, 14, 15, 16 b-e
Demonstrate manual dexterity required to carry out procedures Module 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, i)AOP 5(S) b,- e
14, 15, 16
Approach and carry out procedures with due attention to the safety of Module 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, AOP 4 (S) b - g
patient, self and others 16 5(S) b - e
Adapt skills in the context of each patient and each procedure Module 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10,11, 12, CP & D AOP 5(S) b - e
13, 14, 15, 16
Employ a critically reflective approach to one’s own clinical Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Learning Portfolio 4(S) a - i,
performance with the view to continuous improvement 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. 5 (S)a - f
Communicator
Communicate effectively with patients, their families and the Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 2a, 2b
community through verbal and written means of communication, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
respecting the diversity of background and cultural values
Listen effectively, including being aware and responsive to nonverbal Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, TAC 2d, 2e
cues 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Establish effective relationships with patients, their families (where Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, TAC 2a, 2b
appropriate) and the community, which are characterised by 12, 13, 14
understanding, trust, respect, honesty and empathy
Accurately obtain and synthesise relevant information as well as the Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 2a, 2b
perspectives of patients and families, and other health professionals 11, 12, 13, 14
Communicate information to patients and their families (where Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 2a, 2b, 2d, 2e
appropriate) about surgery and treatment options in such a way that it 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
is easily understood and promotes the patient’s participation in
informed decision making
Demonstrate the importance of cooperation and communication Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 2d
among health professionals so as to maximise the benefits to patient 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
care and outcomes
Address challenging communication issues such as obtaining informed Module 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, TAC 2b, 2d, 2e
consent, delivering bad news, anger, confusion and misunderstanding 13, 14, 15, 16
Convey effective oral and written information about a medical Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 2c, 2d.
encounter 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Collaborator
Assess, plan, provide and integrate care for individual patients (or Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 1e
groups of patients) in collaboration with others 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Recognise the need to refer patients to other professionals Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 1e
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Participate in inter-professional team meetings and demonstrate the Module 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, TAC 1e, 5(G)b
ability to accept, consider and respect the opinions of other team 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Learning Portfolio
members, whilst contributing OMS specific expertise him/herself
Contribute effectively to other inter-professional team activities Module 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, TAC 1e
including activities in alternate settings such as committee work, 13, 14, 15, 16
research, teaching and learning
Respect team ethics, including confidentiality, resource allocation and Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 1e
professionalism 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Effectively work with other health professionals to prevent, negotiate, Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, TAC 1e
and resolve inter-professional conflict 13, 14, 15, 16
Manager
Participate in activities that contribute to the effectiveness of their Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, Learning Portfolio 1i
healthcare organisation, e.g. systemic quality process evaluation and 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
improvement
Utilise personal resources effectively in order to balance patient care, Mode1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1 TAC 1a
practice requirements, learning needs and personal life 3,14,15,16
Make sound judgments on the allocation of healthcare resources, Module 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, TAC 1c
balancing effectiveness, efficiency and access with optimal patient 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
care
Describe the structure and function of the healthcare system as it Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 1f
relates to OMS 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Employ information technology to optimise patient care, lifelong Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Learning Portfolio 2c
learning and other activities 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Plan relevant elements of health care delivery, e.g. work schedules, Module 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, Learning Portfolio 4 (S)a - i,
budgeting, organisational funding 5a - f
Serve in leadership roles effectively Module 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15, TAC 1i
16
Health Advocate
Identify the opportunities for advocacy, health promotion and disease Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, Learning Portfolio 1i
prevention with individual patients, communities and populations, and 13, 14,
respond appropriately
Identify the determinants of the health of the population they serve, Module 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, TAC 1i
including barriers to access to care and resources 13, 14, 15, 16
Describe how public policy is developed and employ methods of Module 3,4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, Exam 1i
influencing the development of health and social policy 13, 14,15,16
Scholar and Teacher
Maintain and enhance professional activities through lifelong learning Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Learning Portfolio 1h, 3a, 3b
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Critically appraise sources of medical information, and apply Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Research 3a, 3b
appropriately 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Facilitate the learning of others Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 1h
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Contribute to the development, dissemination, and translation of new Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Research Project 1h
knowledge and practices 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Professional
Appreciate and consistently apply ethical codes of practice Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 1b, 1e
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Apply the principles and practice of law as they apply to the practice of Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Examination 1f
OMS 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Short course in law and
jurisprudence
Demonstrate a commitment to their patients, profession and society Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Learning Portfolio 1d, 1g, 1h
through participation in profession-led regulation 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Demonstrate insight into their own limitations of expertise via self- Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Learning Portfolio 1a
assessment 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Reflection
Be reliable and responsible Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, TAC 1b, 1c, 1e
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Demonstrate a commitment to personal health and sustainable Module 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Learning Portfolio 1c
practice 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
3 C - SECTION 3
THE MODULES
Schoenwolf GC (2014). Larsen’s Human Embryology. Churchill A modified pre-auricular approach to the temporomandibular joint and malar arch.
Livingstone. Al-Kayat A, Bramley P.
Br J Oral Surg. 1979 Nov;17(2):91-103.
Mark L. Urken MD, FACS, Mack L. Cheney MD, FACS, Keith E. Blackwell
MD, Jeffrey R. Harris MD, Tessa A. Hadlock MD, Neal Futran MD, DMD Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus of the facial nerve based on the
dissection of 100 facial halves.
(2011). Atlas of Regional and Free Flaps for Head and Neck
DINGMAN RO, GRABB WC.
Reconstruction
Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962 Mar;29:266-72.
Journals
Australian Dental Journal The surgical anatomy of the mandibular distribution of the facial nerve.
Ziarah HA, Atkinson ME.
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Br J Oral Surg. 1981 Sep;19(3):159-70.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Facial nerve anatomy relevant to cosmetic surgery.
Burnham MA.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2000 Nov;12(4):613-621.
Anatomical structure of the buccal fat pad and its clinical adaptations.
Zhang HM, Yan YP, Qi KM, Wang JQ, Liu ZF.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jun;109(7):2509-18
A radiological investigation into the age changes of the inferior dental artery.
Bradley JC.
Br J Oral Surg. 1975 Jul;13(1):82-90.
Clinical and Anatomic observations on the relationship of the lingual nerve to the
mandibular third molar region.
The relationship of the lingual nerve to the mandibular third molar region: an
anatomic study.
Pogrel MA, Renaut A, Schmidt B, Ammar A.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Oct;53(10):1178-81
The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve: prevalence, measurement of its
length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone
beam CT imaging.
Apostolakis D, Brown JE.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Sep;23(9):1022-30.
Anatomic study of the mandibular formen, lingula and antilingula in dry mandibles,
and its statistical relationship between the true lingula and antilingula.
Monnazzi MS, Passeri LA, Gabrielli MF, Bolini PD, de Carvalho WR, da Costa
Machado H.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):74-8
Illustrated review of the embryology and development of the facial region, part 2:
Late development of the fetal face and changes in the face from the newborn to
adulthood.
Som PM, Naidich TP.
AJNR AM J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):10-8.
Assessments
CP AND D - MANAGEMENT
RESECT’N RECONSTRUCTION
APPLIED ANATOMY
AOP – RECONSTRUCTION
FINAL EXAMINATION
anatomical variants and their clinical the foetal skull to that of the child and subsequently on anatomical principles
relevance the adult skull • Critically evaluate and discuss anatomical and
• Discuss the osteology of the skull including • Describe the growth and development of the hard and embryological studies in the literature
both intra- and extra-cranial landmarks soft tissues of the face including the theories of facial • Apply anatomical knowledge to complex
• Discuss the skull and bony articulations growth such as the functional matrix surgical procedures
including the orbital and nasal apertures, • Describe the difference and clinical significance of • Apply knowledge of other anatomical sites of
the base of skull and the pterygopalatine cartilaginous and membranous bony growth the body by carrying out bone harvesting
fossa • Describe the topography of the central nervous • Apply the knowledge of embryology to the
• List the cervical vertebrae, their system including a general organisation of the aetiology of craniofacial syndromes and to their
articulations and soft tissue attachments sensory and motor pathways surgical management
• Describe the hyoid bone and its soft tissue
•
attachments
Describe the anatomy of the spinal cord and spinal • Plan and apply surgical access and approaches
nerves including the autonomic nervous system, and based on regional anatomy
• Identify in detail the anatomy of the neck internal structure of the spinal cord
including surface anatomy, cutaneous • Recognise and predict the spread of infection
• Describe the brainstem, cranial nerves and their and malignancy in the head and neck region
innervation, superficial and deep structures
nuclei including the ascending sensory pathways, based on anatomical principles
• Identify in detail the anatomy of the face,
including the surface anatomy, superficial
motor nuclei and descending pathways • Communicate anatomical knowledge in
structures (muscles of facial expression, • Describe the cerebellum and the cerebellar appropriate terminology to patients and co-
connections workers
nerves, arteries, veins, lymphatics, the
parotid gland) and deep structures (the • Describe the gross topography of the diencephalon
muscles of mastication, the (hypothalamus, subthalamus, thalamus and
temporomandibular joint, and infratemporal epithalamus)
fossa) • Describe the anatomy of the cerebral hemispheres
• Describe the scalp including its innervation including the external topography, cerebral cortex and
and blood supply their internal structures
• Describe the anatomy and physiology of • Describe the anatomy of the choroid plexus and
the eye, eyelids, the lacrimal apparatus, cerebrospinal fluid
extra-ocular muscles, the nerves, arteries, • Describe in detail the vasculature of the central
and veins of the orbit nervous system including the concept of the blood
• Describe the anatomy of the external nose brain barrier
and nasal cavity, the paranasal sinuses, • Describe the anatomy of the larynx including its
and the pterygopalatine fossa cartilaginous skeleton, musculature and ligaments,
• Describe the anatomy of the mouth and mucosa, innervation, and blood supply
palate, including the teeth, oral mucosa, • Describe the anatomy and functioning of the
salivary glands, oral and palatal structures involved in speech
musculature, including the innervation, • Describe the anatomy of the external, middle and
arterial and venous blood supply, and inner ear
lymphatic drainage
• Describe the cranial cavity and contents of the
• Explain the anatomy and functioning of the
anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae including
pharynx including its three regions
Resources
Harnsberger HR, Glastonbury CM, Michel MA, Koch BL MR imaging of temporomandibular joint dysfunction: a pictorial review.
(2010). Diagnostic Imaging: Head and Neck 2nd ed). Tomas X, Pomes J, Berenguer J, Quinto L, Nicolau C, Mercader JM, Castro V.
LWW. Radiographics. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):765-81.
MacDonald D (2011). Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology: A Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC,
Diagnostic Approach. Wiley Blackwell. CT and MR imaging.
de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PA, Casselman JW, Kremer B, van Engelshoven JM, Beets-Tan RG.
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Nov;64(2):266-72.
Journals
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology http://dmfr.birjournals.org/ 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology Kyzas PA, Evangelou E, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP.
and endodontology J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 21;100(10):712-20.
http://www.ooooe.net/
Detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer patients with clinically N0 neck-a
meta-analysis comparing different imaging modalities.
Liao LJ, Lo WC, Hsu WL, Wang CT, Lai MS.
BMC Cancer. 2012 Jun 12;12:236. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-236
Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic
review of the literature.
De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;38(6):609-25.
Applications of cone beam computed tomography in the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Quereshy FA, Savell TA, Palomo JM.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;66(4):791-6.
Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.
Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):106-14.
Clinical indications and perspectives for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in oral and
maxillofacial surgery.
Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Heinrich S, Schmelzle R, Heiland M.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103(3):412-7.
Bone scintigraphy as a diagnostic method in unilateral hyperactivity of the mandibular condyles: a review
and meta-analysis of the literature.
Saridin CP, Raijmakers PG, Tuinzing DB, Becking AG.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;40(1):11-7.
Assessments
• Understand the processes involved in the employing • Incisional/excisional biopsies of hard/soft tissue lesions
hospital as well as the funding and administration of the • Removal of foreign body from maxillary sinus
employing hospital and health department • Closure of oro-antral communication
• Incision and drainage of fascial space infections of the head and neck
Refer below for a complete list of competencies by level.
Case Study
• Nerve damage following the removal of a lower third molar tooth
• Odontogenic cysts and tumours of the jaws
• Surgical site infections
• Localised osteitis
Structured Experience
(Trainee to make written notes on patient encounters)
• Explanation for the removal of third molars including potential risks and complications
• Explanation of the management of periapical pathology and other odontogenic injections
• Explanation of the management of maxillary sinus pathology including retrieval of a foreign body from
the sinus and closure of an OAF
• Explanation of neuropathy, including Trigeminal Neuralgia, and its management
Resources
Textbooks Specific articles
Fonseca RJ, Marciani RD, Turvey TA (2008). Oral and White Paper on Third Molar Data (2007)
Maxillofacial Surgery. Saunders. AAOMS
Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen P, Waite P (2011). Peterson’s The Management of Impacted Third Molar Teeth (2013)
Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (3rd ed). AAOMS
PMPH USA.
Guidance on Extraction of Wisdom Teeth (2000)
Andreasen JO, Bakland LK, Flores MT, Andreasen FM, NICE
Andersson L (2011). Traumatic Dental Injuries: A Manual
(3rd ed). Wiley Blackwell. The effects of NICE guidelines on the management of third molar teeth.
McArdle LW, Renton T.
Br Dent J. 2012 Sep;213(5):E8.
Third molar removal: an overview of indications, imaging, evaluation, and assessment of risk.
Journals Marciani RD.
Australian Dental Journal Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Feb;19(1):1-13
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Management of the impacted canine and second molar.
Alberto PL.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Feb;19(1):59-68
Coronectomy of the lower third molar is safe within the first 3 years.
Leung YY, Cheung LK.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;70(7):1515-22.
A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a
result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars.
Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, McGurk M.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;43(1):7-12.
Microsurgical repair of the inferior alveolar nerve: success rate and factors that adversely affect outcome.
Bagheri SC, Meyer RA, Cho SH, Thoppay J, Khan HA, Steed MB.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;70(8):1978-90.
The displaced lower third molar: a literature review and suggestions for management.
Huang IY, Wu CW, Worthington P.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jun;65(6):1186-90.
EFNS guideline on the treatment of cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis in adult patients.
Einhäupl K, Stam J, Bousser MG, De Bruijn SF, Ferro JM, Martinelli I, Masuhr F; European Federation of
Neurological Societies.
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Oct;17(10):1229-35.
Assessments
SST EXAMINATION
AOP REMOVAL OF AN IMPACTED
TOOTH
CP AND D MANAGEMENT OF
DENTOALVEOLAR INJURIES
AOP PATIENT WITH
DENTOALVEOLAR PATHOLOGY
USING APPROPRIATE IMAGING
FINAL EXAMINATION
List of competencies by level
Level One Levels Two and Three
Perform removal of erupted teeth also Surgical management of odontogenic infections
• Endodontic surgery • Carry out a thorough history, examination, and diagnosis of odontogenic infections
• Hemisection of teeth • Sensitively communicate to patients the findings of their assessment and diagnosis, the
potential procedures, and associated risks
• Periodontal surgery
• Localised grafting procedures, both hard and soft tissues • Obtain informed consent
• Guided tissue regeneration • Perform appropriate surgical management of odontogenic infections including management of
the airway
• Alveolar osseous surgery
Assess and manage co-existing medical problems
• Crown lengthening procedures
• Assess the location and severity for a patient with a spreading odontogenic infection
Manage impacted teeth
• Interpret appropriate imaging of infection using CT, ultrasound and MRI
• Diagnose impacted teeth, using appropriate clinical and
• Perform incision and drainage routines of odontogenic infections, e.g. submandibular buccal
radiographic interpretation to determine the position of and palatal abscesses
anatomical structures
• Utilise drains and drainage techniques that are appropriate for the patient’s needs
• Surgically remove, reposition, reimplant, and/or transplant,
impacted teeth • Accurately assess patients at risk of osteonecrosis
Odontogenic infections. • Apply knowledge of prophylactic protocols associated with the diagnosis and arrange
appropriate management of osteoradionecrosis including hyperbaric oxygen
• Describe in detail the anatomy of the fascial spaces of the
• Diagnose and undertake medical and surgical management of cases of osteomyelitis of the
head and neck and the spread of infection to these spaces jaws
• Explain the surgical management of such infections • Make appropriate decisions regarding airway management for patients with deep fascial
including Ludwig’s angina space infections
• Identify normal microflora of the mouth, para nasal sinuses • Consult and work effectively with anaesthetic and intensive care staff in the management of
and skin patients
• Recognise and describe the common microflora of • Work in teams in the appropriate response to fulminant and life threatening head and neck
odontogenic infections, facial skin infections, sinus infections, such as necrotising fascititis and rhinocerebral zygomycosis
infections, pharyngeal infections • Manage complications of severe infections including haemorrhage and shock, ophthalmic,
• Indicate the principles, and demonstrate the techniques of chest and cerebral complications
sampling and analysing micro-organisms involved in Deformities and defects of the dentoalveolar complex
infections, culture and sensitivity testing
• Carry out a thorough history, examination, and diagnosis of patients requiring surgical
• Explain the basis of empirical antibiotic therapy alteration, repair, graft, excision, reduction, or augmentation of the hard and or/soft tissues of
The medically compromised patient the dentoalveolar complex such as frenectomy, reduction of the tuberosity, excision of a
fibrous tuberosity, an osseous tuberosity and removal of bony exostoses including mandibular
• Discuss the management of the medically compromised
and maxillary tori, corticotomy
patient, including extremes of age
Augmentation of hard tissue defects
• Liaise with relevant medical specialists in the care of
medically compromised patients undergoing oral and • Bone grafting procedures, guided tissue regeneration, surgical revision procedures, Intraoral
maxillofacial surgery pedical soft tissue grafting procedures, free soft tissue grafts (including donor graft
procedures), subepithelial grafting procedures, Alveolar distraction procedures
Reconstruction of soft tissue defects
• Apically repositioned flap, bone replacement procedures, guided tissue regeneration, soft
tissue grafts and connective tissue grafts
• Vestibuloplasty procedures including soft tissue grafts and donor site management
• Lowering of the floor of the mouth with and without skin or mucosal grafting
• Alveoloplasty and alveolectomy
• Excision of redundant tissue, i.e., denture hyperplasia
• Mucogingival surgery, gingivectomy, gingivoplasty, free soft tissue grafting procedures,
apically repositioned flaps and pedicle flap procedures
• Management of oroantral and oronasal fistulae
• Sensitively communicate to patients the findings of their assessment and diagnosis, the
potential procedures, and associated benefits and risks
• Obtain informed consent
• Provide patients and/or family with post-operative instructions and arrange appropriate post-
operative follow up
• Examine, diagnose, manage, and perform appropriate procedures for patients with alveolar
pathology including odontogenic cysts and tumours or non-odontogenic lesions occurring
A trainee eligible to sit for the FRACDS (OMS) should be able to: Learning Portfolio Checklist
Examination and diagnosis of a patient requiring pre-prosthetic
• Manage the implant patient from assessment through to, and have an understanding of,
and implant surgery
prosthetic rehabilitation
Examine and interpret appropriate imaging including plain
• Independently and safely manage the implant patient including the pre-prosthetic soft
radiographs and CT scans
and hard tissue management of such patients
Treatment plan including pre-prosthetic surgery and implant
• Identify (discuss/explain/evaluate/differentiate between/compare and contrast) various placement
methods involved with implant reconstruction
• Select appropriate investigative tools that are cost-effective and useful Logbook
• Appropriately select between the various methods involved with implant reconstruction Trainee to log –
according to the symptoms and needs of each patient • Pre-prosthetic – minor (7)
• Communicate with patients (and their families) about procedures, potentials, and risks • Pre-prosthetic – major (8)
associated with pre-prosthetic surgery and implants to the head and neck area in
• Pre-prosthetic – implants (9)
particular the face and jaws, in ways that encourage their participation in informed (Number refers to category in Logbook)
decision making
• Demonstrate sound basic surgical skills and competently carry out specific surgical Literature Review
procedures (including microscopic and endoscopic abilities), applying appropriate and
• Indications for pre-prosthetic surgery
safe operative techniques within each of these parameters
• Communicate with and co-ordinate surgical teams to achieve an optimal clinical
• Bone grafting to the maxilla
environment • Bone grafting to the mandible
• Converse with and work with colleagues in allied specialties • The placement of dental implants and where
• Manage patients in ways that demonstrate sensitivity to their psychological needs • Immediate implants and their problems
• Develop a care plan for a patient in collaboration with members of an multidisciplinary • Implant design and surface coatings
team
Case Study
• Make clinical decisions and judgements based on sound evidence for the benefit of the
patient • Rehabilitation of a patient with significant soft and hard tissue
defects with implants
• Demonstrate insight into his/her limitations of expertise and refer patients
• Consult, cooperate and discuss with other clinicians as required
Tutorial
• Teach and hand down, encourage other juniors, undergraduates and graduates on ward
rounds, clinics and other classes as required
• Clinical assessment of the patient for dental implant therapy
• Understand the processes involved in the employing hospital as well as the funding and
• Soft tissues in relation tom dental implants
administration of the employing hospital and health department • The immediate implant and the immediate bridge
• Understand the biological basis of success (or failure) of orofacial implants • Navigation in relation to implant placement
• Zygomatic implants
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery "All-on-4" immediate-function concept for completely edentulous maxillae: a clinical report on the
medium (3 years) and long-term (5 years) outcomes.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Francischone C, Rigolizzo M.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e139-50.
Sinus floor augmentation surgery using autologous bone grafts from various donorsites: a meta-
analysis of the total bone volume.
Klijn RJ, Meijer GJ, Bronkhorst EM, Jansen JA.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010 Jun;16(3):295-303.
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus.
Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;5:CD008397.
Oral bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw after implant surgery: a case report and
literature review.
Bedogni A, Bettini G, Totola A, Saia G, Nocini PF.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7):1662-6.
The nature and frequency of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws in dental implant
patients: a South Australian case series.
Goss A, Bartold M, Sambrook P, Hawker P.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):337-43.
The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dentalimplant placement:
a literature review.
Greenstein G, Tarnow D.
J Periodontol. 2006 Dec;77(12):1933-43.
A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans.
Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review.
Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:22-38.
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for
dental implant treatment.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD003607.
Assessments
OMS 1 OMS 2 OMS 3 OMS 4
SST EXAMINATION
• Identify and discuss medical factors affecting encourage their participation in informed decision Augmentation with alloplastic materials
treatment making such as calcium based compounds and
• Describe the implications for the aged patient in • Using appropriate medical terminology, clearly mixtures, such as platelet rich plasma
preprosthetic and implant surgery communicate with allied specialists (PRP) and bone morphogenetic protein
(BMP)
• Describe the anatomy and pathophysiology of • Describe the concepts of osseointegration and
edentulous bone loss transfer of load Lateralisation of the inferior dental nerve
Sinus lift procedures
• Resorption • Differentiate the various types of implants
Alveolar distraction
• Factors influencing bone loss • Perform basic preprosthetic surgical procedures to
include: Guided tissue regeneration with
• Metabolic membranes
Osteoporosis Frenectomy and socket preservation
Removal denture hyperplasia • Communicate with patients (and their
Osteomalacia families) about procedures, potentials and
Drug therapy Submucous vestibuloplasty risks associated with the above modalities
Renal osteodystrophy Vestibuloplasty with skin or mucosal graft in ways that encourage their participation
Nutritional Lowering floor of mouth with or without graft in informed decision making
Facial Morphology, etc Mylohyoid ridge reduction • Discuss the management of complex
Mechanical factors – trauma Reduction of tuberosity implant problems and rehabilitation
Alteration in form Tuberoplasty • Immediate loading and its implications
Mental nerve reposition Orthognathic surgery associated with
• Discuss the management of patients with
compromised bone – Mandibular and maxillary Bone augmentation implants
irradiated bone, bisphosphonate treated bone Alveoloplasty Bone graft procedures and augmentation
Secondary alveolar recontouring grafts
• Discuss the principles of bone induction and the
biology of grafting Redundant crestal tissue removal Distraction osteogenesis to reposition the
jaws and segments of the jaws
Principles of osteoinduction Maxillary tuberosity reduction
Orthopaedic and orthodontic applications
Principles of transplantation Tuberplasty
Restoration of acquired head and Neck
Bone grafts Tori removal
defects
Compare and contrast various diagnostic imaging Papillary hyperplasia, etc
Reconstruction of the trauma patient
modalities • Perform basic implant surgery (one or two implants in
Reconstruction of the patient with
• Conventional imaging for preprosthetic and implant the maxilla and/or mandible not requiring adjunctive
congenital deformity
surgery surgical procedures)
Reconstruction of the patient with
Panoranic radiograph • Manage post-operative complications developmental deformity
Lateral cephalometric radiograph Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the
Periapical radiograph Cancer patient
Occlusal radiograph Management of irradiated bone
Tomography Reconstruction of the patient with an
CT Imaging and computer aided planning alveolar cleft
• Understand the processes involved in the employing (Trainee to make written notes on patient encounters)
hospital as well as the funding and administration of • Informed consent (parents and child)
the employing hospital and health department • Explanation of the procedure of alveolar bone grafting to a cleft and harvest of the graft, including
potential side effects, risks and specific complications
Refer below for a complete list of competencies by level. • Explanation of orbital floor exploration +/- reconstruction in a child following trauma, potential
post-operative course, risks and specific complications of orbital surgery
• Psychological and ethical management – balanced discussion with parents and child of the
option of orthognathic surgery in a patient who presents with a significant medical comorbidity
(e.g. cystic fibrosis), intellectual disability, limited life expectancy or religious belief which impacts
upon potential management
Resources
Textbooks Specific articles
Kaban L, Troulis M (2004). Pediatric Oral and A proposed modification for the classification of cleft lip and cleft palate.
Maxillofacial Surgery. Saunders. Spina V.
Cleft Palate J. 1973 Jul;10:251-2.
Posnick JC (2000). Craniofacial and Maxillofacial Surgery
in Children and Young Adults. Saunders. From birth to maturity: a group of patients who have completed their protocol management. Part I.
Unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Atlas of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Elsevier 2015 Schnitt DE, Agir H, David DJ.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Mar;113(3):805-17.
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery- Eds Anderson,
Kahnberg and Pogrel, 2010. Chapter 45 “Cleft Lip & From birth to maturity: a group of patients who have completed their protocol management. Part II.
Isolated cleft palate.
Palate- an overview”
David DJ, Anderson PJ, Schnitt DE, Nugent MA, Sells R.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Feb;117(2):515-26.
Journals
The reconstruction of anterior residual bone defects in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate. A
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
review.
Witsenburg B.
Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Surgery Journal
J Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Oct;13(5):197-208.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Ensuring success in alveolar bone grafting: a three-dimensional approach.
Craven C, Cole P, Hollier L Jr, Stal S.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery – (Cleft & Craniofacial
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Jul;18(4):855-9.
Education modules)
Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting
and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:175–204.
Hemifacial Microsomia: use of the OMENS-Plus classification at the Royal Children’s Hospital of
Melbourne.
Poon C-H, Meara JG, Heggie AA.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1011-8.
Midfacial growth after costochondral graft construction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial
microsomia.
Padwa BL, Mulliken JB, Maghen A, Kaban LB.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Feb;56(2):122-7
Surgical correction of mandibular hypoplasia in hemifacial microsomia: the case for treatment in early
childhood.
Kaban LB, Padwa BL, Mulliken JB.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 May;56(5):628-38.
Effect of alveolar bone grafting in the mixed dentition on maxillary growth in complete unilateral cleft
lip and palate patients. Daskalogiannakis J, Ross R B. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:455-458.
Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a review of the literature. Manfredi M, Vescovi P, Bonanini M,
Porter S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:117-124.
Craniofacial Disorders.
Heggie AA
Aust Dent J 2018; 63: (1 Suppl): S58-68
Assessments
SST EXAMINATION
CP AND D MANAGEMENT OF
DENTOALVEOLAR INJURIES IN A
PAEDIATRIC PATIENT
AOP HARVEST OF CANCELLOUS
ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT
AOP MANAGEMENT OF
PAEDIATRIC MANDIBULAR
OR MID-FACIAL FRACTURE
TEAM APPRAISAL OF CONDUCT
FINAL EXAMINATION
(TAC)
FINAL EXAMINATION
of the medically compromised paediatric • Perform surgery for intra-oral soft tissue • Describe the principles of surgical management in
patient anomalies and lesions: frenum, soft tissue the interdisciplinary management of clediocranial
• Communicate with patients and their lesions, gingivo-fibromatoses & salivary gland dysplasia or hypodontia syndromes, e.g. ectodermal
families about procedures, potential lesions (mucocoeles, ranula) etc dysplasia
complications and risks associated with • Manage dentoalveolar injuries • Surgical management of dento-alveolar and
the paediatric patient • Perform the initial assessment and management maxillofacial injuries in the paediatric patient
• Describe facial growth and development of the child patient with orbital, mid-facial and • Describe the principles of interdisciplinary
Discuss the management of cystic and mandibular fractures management of severe craniofacial trauma
odontogenic lesions in children • Discuss the options, principles of management • Participate in the cleft lip and palate/craniofacial team
and use of fixation in children and Orthognathic meetings
• Describe the pathology, genetics and • Describe and have knowledge of:
management of disorders of disorders presenting -Pre-surgical orthopaedics and early orthodontic
in childhood eg NBCCS, fibrous dysplasia, treatment
Langerhans cell histocytosis -The principles of primary cleft repair
• Understand the management of:
Cleft lip and palate / Craniofacial microsomia: -Maxillary alveolar cleft
• Describe the stages in management of the cleft / - Surgically-assisted maxillary expansion
CFM patient (pathway protocols) - Oronasal and palatal fistula repair
• Discuss treatment planning for surgical skeletal -The surgical management of the cleft maxilla and
correction related
• Perform a cephalometric analysis orthognathic surgery
• Perform model taking and articulation or - Reconstruction of the cleft alveolus for tooth
computer planning replacement
• Perform clinical photography - Craniofacial implantology - Ear and orbital
prostheses
- Surgical protocols in management of the more
common
craniofacial syndromes, e.g. Treacher Colins
Syndrome and craniosynostoses
• Discuss the assessment and management options
for upper airway obstruction in infants and children
• Discuss the role of distraction osteogenesis for the
paediatric patient
• Understand concepts of dermoscopy, margin control • Fibro osseous disease and systemic diseases effecting bone
surgery and aesthetic subunit reconstruction in the
management of cutaneous malignancy Case Study
• Consult, cooperate and discuss with other clinicians as • Maxillary reconstruction after resection
required • Mandibular reconstruction after resection including rehabilitation
• Teach and hand down, encourage other juniors,
undergraduates and graduates on ward rounds, clinics Observation
and other classes as required • Neck dissection in relation to malignant disease in the head and neck
• Understand the processes involved in the employing • Parotidectomy for benign pathology
hospital as well as the funding and administration of • Nerve grafting and repair, microvascular free transfer of tissues
the employing hospital and health department
Simulation
Refer below for a complete list of competencies by level. • TMJ Arthroscopy
• Salivary endoscopy – Salivary stones and dilation of ducts (sialadenoscopy)
• Endoscopy of the maxillary sinus – removal of foreign bodies, orbital floor exploration
• Microneurosurgery/Microvascular surgery
Structured Experience
• Explanation of malignant disease to a patient and family members
• Explanation, management and rehabilitation of the cancer patient
Resources
Journals Systematic review of the treatment and prognosis of the odontogenic keratocyst.
Blanas N, Freund B, Schwartz M, Furst IM.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Nov;90(5):553-8.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery A systematic review of the recurrence rate for keratocystic odontogenic tumour in relation to
treatment modalities.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Kaczmarzyk T, Mojsa I, Stypulkowska J.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jun;41(6):756-67.
Journal of Oral Pathology
Critical time of exposure of the rabbit inferior alveolar nerve to Carnoy's solution.
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Frerich B, Cornelius CP, Wiethölter H.
Radiology and Endodontics J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Jun;52(6):599-606.
Odontogenic keratocysts: a clinical and histologic comparison of the parakeratin and orthokeratin
variants.
Crowley TE, Kaugars GE, Gunsolley JC.
Journals J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Jan;50(1):22-6.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Ameloblastoma
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
The ameloblastoma: primary, curative surgical management.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Carlson ER, Marx RE.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Mar;64(3):484-94.
Journal of Oral Pathology
Ameloblastoma: a surgeon's dilemma.
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Ghandhi D, Ayoub AF, Pogrel MA, MacDonald G, Brocklebank LM, Moos KF.
Radiology and Endodontics J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jul;64(7):1010-4.
Ameloblastoma in children.
Ord RA, Blanchaert RH Jr, Nikitakis NG, Sauk JJ.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Jul;60(7):762-70
MRONJ
Oral bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis: risk factors, prediction of risk using serum CTX testing,
prevention, and treatment.
Marx RE, Cillo JE Jr, Ulloa JJ.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Dec;65(12):2397-410.
ORN
Risk factors for osteoradionecrosis after head and neck radiation: a systematic review.
Nabil S, Samman N.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jan;113(1):54-69.
The radiation-induced fibroatrophic process: therapeutic perspective via the antioxidant pathway.
Delanian S, Lefaix JL.
Radiother Oncol. 2004 Nov;73(2):119-31.
Efficacy of pre- and postirradiation hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the prevention of postextraction
osteoradionecrosis: a systematic review.
Fritz GW, Gunsolley JC, Abubaker O, Laskin DM.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Nov;68(11):2653-60.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radionecrosis of the jaw: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-
blind trial from the ORN96 study group.
Annane D, Depondt J, Aubert P, Villart M, Géhanno P, Gajdos P, Chevret S.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 15;22(24):4893-900.
Major healing of refractory mandible osteoradionecrosis after treatment combining pentoxifylline and
tocopherol: a phase II trial.
Delanian S, Depondt J, Lefaix JL.
Head Neck. 2005 Feb;27(2):114-23.
The sensitivity and specificity of frozen-section histopathology in the management of benign oral and
maxillofacial lesions.
Aronovich S, Kim RY.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;72(5):914-9.
Accuracy, utility, and cost of frozen section margins in head and neck cancer surgery.
DiNardo LJ, Lin J, Karageorge LS, Powers CN.
Laryngoscope. 2000 Oct;110(10 Pt 1):1773-6.
Impact of use of frozen section assessment of operative margins on survival in oral cancer.
Pathak KA, Nason RW, Penner C, Viallet NR, Sutherland D, Kerr PD.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):235-9.
Salivary gland
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology
for parotid gland lesions.
Schmidt RL, Hall BJ, Wilson AR, Layfield LJ.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jul;136(1):45-59.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle
biopsy for salivary gland lesions.
Schmidt RL, Hall BJ, Layfield LJ.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Oct;136(4):516-26.
Assessments
OMS 1 OMS 2 OMS 3 OMS 4
SST EXAMINATION
AOP HEAD AND NECK
EXAMINATION PATHOLOGY
AOP TREATMENT REQUIRING
SOFT TISSUE GRAFT/FLAP LOCAL
AND DISTANT SITE
AOP INCISIONAL BIOPSY
AOP EXCISIONAL BIOPSY TREATMENT REQUIRING HARD
TISSUE GRAFT LOCAL DISTANT
SITE
CP AND D MANAGE PATHOLOGY
MAXILLOFACIAL REGION
TEAM APPRAISAL OF CONDUCT FINAL EXAMINATION
(TAC)
FINAL EXAMINATION
• Teach and hand down, encourage other juniors, involve immunogenic triggering of apoptosis in basal keratinocytes. Outline your
undergraduates and graduates on ward rounds, clinics understanding of the aetiology of oral lichen planus
and other classes as required
• Understand the processes involved in the employing Observation
hospital as well as the funding and administration of the • The pathological assessment of a range of mucosal disease
employing hospital and health department
Case Study
Refer below for a complete list of competencies by level. Documented treatment of patients with -
− Recurrent aphthous ulceration
− Oral lichen planus
− Mucous membrane pemphigoid
− Pemphigus vulgaris
− Erythema multiforme
− Lupus erythematosis
− Temporomandibular Disorder
− Oral dysaesthesia
− Oral candidosis
− Dry mouth
Structured Experience
(Trainee to make written notes on patient encounters)
• Explanation of the diagnosis, management and continuing care of patients with a range of
non-malignant mucosal disease as well as patients with TMD, oral dysaesthesia and
trigeminal neuropathies
Resources
Textbooks Specific articles
OLP
Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot J (2008). Oral
and Maxillofacial Pathology (3rd ed). Saunders. Malignant transformation of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: A meta-analysis of 20095
patient data.
Slootweg PJ, Cardesa A (2006). Pathology of the Head and Aghbari SMH, Abushouk AI, Attia A, Elmaraezy A, Menshawy A, Ahmed MS, Elsaadany BA,
Neck. Springer. Ahmed EM.
Oral Oncol. 2017 May;68:92-102.
Farah CS, Balasubramaniam R, McCullough MJ (2018).
Contemporary Oral Medicine. Springer. The malignant transformation of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: a systematic review.
Fitzpatrick SG, Hirsch SA, Gordon SC.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Jan;145(1):45-56.
Lack of clinicopathologic correlation in the diagnosis of oral lichen planus based on the presently
available diagnostic criteria and suggestions for modifications.
van der Meij EH, van der Waal I.
J Oral Pathol Med. 2003 Oct;32(9):507-12.
Journal of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with
clinically evident lesions.
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Macey R, Walsh T, Brocklehurst P, Kerr AR, Liu JL, Lingen MW, Ogden GR, Warnakulasuriya S,
Radiology and Endodontics Scully C.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 29;(5):CD010276
Potentially malignant disorders of the oral and oropharyngeal mucosa; terminology, classification
and present concepts of management.
van der Waal I.
Oral Oncol. 2009 Apr-May;45(4-5):317-23.
Vesiculobullous disease
World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of the treatment of mucocutaneous
pemphigus vulgaris.
McMillan R, Taylor J, Shephard M et al.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Aug;120(2):132-42.e61.
Consensus statement on definitions of disease, end points, and therapeutic response for
pemphigus.
Murrell DF, Dick S, Ahmed AR et al.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Jun;58(6):1043-6.
The first international consensus on mucous membrane pemphigoid: definition, diagnostic criteria,
pathogenic factors, medical treatment, and prognostic indicators.
Chan LS, Ahmed AR, Anhalt GJ et al.
Arch Dermatol. 2002 Mar;138(3):370-9.
Correlations between clinical patterns and causes of erythema multiforme majus, Stevens-
Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis: results of an international prospective study.
Auquier-Dunant A, Mockenhaupt M, Naldi L, Correia O, Schröder W, Roujeau JC; SCAR Study
Group. Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions.
Arch Dermatol. 2002 Aug;138(8):1019-24.
Comprehensive survival analysis of a cohort of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic
epidermal necrolysis.
Sekula P, Dunant A, Mockenhaupt M, Naldi L, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Halevy S, Kardaun S, Sidoroff
A, Liss Y, Schumacher M, Roujeau JC; RegiSCAR study group.
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 May;133(5):1197-204.
Assessments
OMS 1 OMS 2 OMS 3 OMS 4
SST EXAMINATION
CP AND D ASSESSMENT AND
MANAGEMENT OF ORAL MUCOSAL
DISEASE INCLUDING
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY
CP AND D ASSESSMENT AND
UNDERSTANDING OF ORAL
MUCOSAL DISEASE
CP AND D ASSESSMENT, TMD ORAL
PAIN
TEAM APPRAISAL OF CONDUCT FINAL EXAMINATION
(TAC)
FINAL EXAMINATION
List of competencies by level
Level One Level Two Level Three
• Describe the structure and function of normal oral and • Describe the manifestations of melanotic naevi of • Define the relationship between
facial mucosa maxillofacial area melanin pigmentation and systemic
• Describe the mucosal manifestations of systemic • Diagnose oral manifestations of sexually diseases and distinguish between
disease transmitted diseases them (this is quite rare)
• Discuss the incidence of clinical conditions with • Describe the maxillofacial manifestation of • Describe the manifestation of oro-facial
borderline abnormality, e.g. Linea Alba, Fordyce immunodeficiency states syndromes, e.g. Bechets, Sturge
anomaly, etc • Describe current pharmacology and therapeutics Weber and Basal Cell Naevus
• Describe and diagnose white and red patches of the for oral mucosal diseases including the role and Syndrome
oral mucosa efficacy of antiviral agents • Diagnose and manage the oral
• Describe, diagnose and manage patients with oral • Diagnose and manage bacterial, fungal and viral mucosal manifestations of
manifestations of: diseases of the oral mucosa haematological disorders
fungal disease • Diagnose and manage patients with vesiculo- • Diagnose and manage oral mucosal
viral disease bullous lesions of the oral mucosa dermatoses and auto-immune
bacterial disease • Diagnose and manage cysts of oral mucosa disorders
dermatoses, e.g. lichen planus • Diagnose oral malignancy, including the lip • Describe and manage the effects of
blood dyscrasias, e.g. anaemia • Discuss malignant transformation of the oral drugs on the oral mucosa
neoplasia mucosa • Management of oral mucosal
• Describe the similarities and difference between • Describe and manage the changes in oral mucosa ulceration
neoplasia, hypertrophy and hyperplasia in relation to systemic disease, e.g. diabetes and • Manage oral malignancy in association
• Describe the use of systemic and topical agents in the mal-absorption syndromes with a multidisciplinary team
management of oral mucosal conditions including the • Describe and manage the malignant transformation • Management of granulomatous
use of steroids. risk of Lichen Planus conditions of the head and neck
• Diagnose and manage gingival swellings • Management of vascular lesions of the oral mucosa
• Diagnose and manage salivary gland conditions
• Diagnose and manage sore mouth and differentiate
between the role of different underlying causes
• Diagnose causes of endogenous and exogenous
pigmentation of oral mucosa and peri-oral region
• Order and interpret appropriate and special tests to
confirm a diagnosis
• Incisional and excisional biopsy
• Immunofluorescence
• Identify and manage iatrogenic mucosal conditions
• Management of xerostomia
• Management of halitosis
Observation
• Surgical management of malignant sinus disease, maxillectomy and neck dissection
• Reconstruction options for resected maxillary with local, pedicled (regional) and vascularised (distant)
free flaps
Case Study
• Management of the recurrent oro-antral communication
• Surgical options for reconstruction of the maxillectomy defects (local, regional, distant tissues vs
alloplastic)
• Management of the atrophic maxilla, sinus lift bone grafts and implant fixture placement
• Management of severe life-threatening infections of the maxillary sinus eg fungal
Resources
Kiran Kumar Krishanappa S1, Eachempati P, Kumbargere Nagraj S, Shetty NY, Moe S, Aggarwal H, Mathew
RJ. Interventions for treating oro-antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 16;8:CD011784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011784.pub3.
Assessments
FINAL EXAMINATION
A trainee eligible to sit for the FRACDS(OMS) should Learning Portfolio Checklist
be able to: Diagnosis of oral malignancy
Participate in the multi-disciplinary team as an effective oncology team member in operative procedures
• Recognise the early symptoms of Oral and in the surgical management of OM malignancy
Maxillofacial malignancy Provide leadership to the multidisciplinary oncology team in terms of iOM cancer care
(The oral and maxillofacial surgeon is the principal expert in the area of oral and maxillofacial pathology
• Accurately identify the pathogenesis and
and the dental
aetiology of OM malignancy
management of oncology patients; expertise in this area is important for optimal patient care)
• Investigate and accurately diagnose patients that
potentially have OM malignancy Logbook
• Communicate with patients (and their families) Trainee to log –
about procedures, reasonable expectations, • Pathology-malignant (6)
limitations and risks associated with OM • Reconstructive (15-18)
malignancy (Number refers to category in Logbook)
• Manage the OM malignancy patient from
assessment through to rehabilitation within a Literature Review
multi-disciplinary Head and Neck team • Management of the clinically negative (N0) neck
• Demonstrate sound basic surgical skills and
competently carry out surgical procedures Tutorial
applying appropriate and safe operative • Assessment and staging of OM cancer
techniques in the treatment of OM malignancy • The use of radiotherapy in OM malignancy
• Communicate with and co-ordinate surgical • The use of grafts and flaps in the management of OM cancer
teams to achieve an optimal clinical environment • The indications and techniques for maxillectomy
• Develop a care plan for a patient in collaboration • Segmental or rim mandibulectomy
with members of an multi-disciplinary team
• Be prepared to enter advanced training in oral Observation
and maxillofacial oncology in such areas as Tumour Resection
independent practice in the neck and associated • Soft tissue - buccal mucosa, tongue, floor of mouth
areas and in such techniques as microvascular • Hard tissue – ramus, angle, symphysis, condyle maxilla
free tissue transfer • Reconstruction - palatal rotation flap, facial artery myomucosal flap, buccal fat pad flap, temporalis flap,
• Consult, cooperate and discuss with other free tissue transfer
clinicians as required
Case Study
• Tumour involving retromolar trigone
• Teach and hand down, encourage other juniors, • Tumour needing maxillectomy
undergraduates and graduates on ward rounds, • Tumour requiring Hemiglossectomy
clinics and other classes as required • Patient with Osteoradionecrosis
• Understand the processes involved in the
employing hospital as well as the funding and Structured Experience
administration of the employing hospital and (Trainee to make written notes on patient encounters)
health department Explanation of diagnosis of cancer
Refer below for a complete list of competencies by • Explanation of the management of cancer
level. • Explanation of continuing/palliative care
• Care of the palliative patient
• Behaviours and strategies to prevent self-harm (smoking and drinking)
Resources
Textbooks Specific articles
Schmidt BL (2010). Principles of oral cancer Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract.
management. In L Andersson, KE Kahnberg, MA Shah JP.
Pogrel (eds), Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (pp 705- Am J Surg. 1990 Oct;160(4):405-9.
734). Wiley-Blackwell.
Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC,
Shah JP, Shah J, Johnson NW (2003). Oral Cancer. CT and MR imaging.
Informa Healthcare. de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PA, Casselman JW, Kremer B, van Engelshoven JM, Beets-Tan RG.
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Nov;64(2):266-72.
Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot J (2008).
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (3rd ed). Saunders. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Cardesa A, Slootweg P (2006). Pathology of the Kyzas PA, Evangelou E, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP.
Head and Neck. Springer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 21;100(10):712-20.
Detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer patients with clinically N0 neck-a meta-
Journals & web based materials
analysis comparing different imaging modalities.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery Liao LJ, Lo WC, Hsu WL, Wang CT, Lai MS.
BMC Cancer. 2012 Jun 12;12:236.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Treatment failure and margin status in head and neck cancer. A critical view on the potential value of
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery molecular pathology.
Slootweg PJ, Hordijk GJ, Schade Y, van Es RJ, Koole R.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Oral Oncol. 2002 Jul;38(5):500-3.
Journal of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery Discontinuous vs in-continuity neck dissection in carcinoma of the oral cavity.
Leemans CR, Tiwari R, Nauta JJ, Snow GB.
www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/oral/ Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Sep;117(9):1003-6.
NCCN Guidelines Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head
and neck.
Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Campbell BH, Saxman SB, Kish JA, Kim HE, Cmelak AJ,
Rotman M, Machtay M, Ensley JF, Chao KS, Schultz CJ, Lee N, Fu KK; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
9501/Intergroup.
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 6;350(19):1937-44.
Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck
cancer.
Bernier J, Domenge C, Ozsahin M, Matuszewska K, Lefèbvre JL, Greiner RH, Giralt J, Maingon P, Rolland F,
Bolla M, Cognetti F, Bourhis J, Kirkpatrick A, van Glabbeke M; European Organization for Research and
Treatment of Cancer Trial 22931.
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 6;350(19):1945-52.
Patterns of invasion and routes of tumor entry into the mandible by oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Brown JS, Lowe D, Kalavrezos N, D'Souza J, Magennis P, Woolgar J.
Head Neck. 2002 Apr;24(4):370-83.
Evidence for imaging the mandible in the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review.
Brown JS, Lewis-Jones H.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Dec;39(6):411-8.
Influence of bone invasion and extent of mandibular resection on local control of cancers of the oral cavity
and oropharynx.
O'Brien CJ, Adams JR, McNeil EB, Taylor P, Laniewski P, Clifford A, Parker GD.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Oct;32(5):492-7.
Neck dissection classification update: revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the
American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
Robbins KT, Clayman G, Levine PA, Medina J, Sessions R, Shaha A, Som P, Wolf GT;
American Head and NeckSociety; American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;128(7):751-8.
An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of postoperative irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the
oral cavity.
Parsons JT, Mendenhall WM, Stringer SP, Cassisi NJ, Million RR.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Aug 1;39(1):137-48.
Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-
and-neck cancer.
Ang KK, Trotti A, Brown BW, Garden AS, Foote RL, Morrison WH, Geara FB, Klotch DW, Goepfert H, Peters
LJ.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Nov 1;51(3):571-8.
Tumor thickness influences prognosis of T1 and T2 oral cavity cancer--but what thickness?
O'Brien CJ, Lauer CS, Fredricks S, Clifford AR, McNeil EB, Bagia JS, Koulmandas C.
Head Neck. 2003 Nov;25(11):937-45.
Gingival carcinoma: retrospective analysis of 72 patients and indications for elective neck dissection.
Lubek J, El-Hakim M, Salama AR, Liu X, Ord RA.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;49(3):182-5.
Frequency and therapeutic implications of "skip metastases" in the neck from squamous carcinoma of the
oral tongue.
Byers RM, Weber RS, Andrews T, McGill D, Kare R, Wolf P.
Head Neck. 1997 Jan;19(1):14-9.
Posterior triangle metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.
Davidson BJ, Kulkarny V, Delacure MD, Shah JP.
Am J Surg. 1993 Oct;166(4):395-8.
Relevance of skip metastases for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue and the floor of the mouth.
Dias FL, Lima RA, Kligerman J, Farias TP, Soares JR, Manfro G, Sa GM.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Mar;134(3):460-5.
Metastases to level IIb in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lea J, Bachar G, Sawka AM, Lakra DC, Gilbert RW, Irish JC, Brown DH, Gullane PJ, Goldstein DP.
Head Neck. 2010 Feb;32(2):184-90.
Accuracy, utility, and cost of frozen section margins in head and neck cancer surgery.
DiNardo LJ, Lin J, Karageorge LS, Powers CN.
Laryngoscope. 2000 Oct;110(10 Pt 1):1773-6.
Assessments
OMS 1 OMS 2 OMS 3 OMS 4
SST Examination
FINAL EXAMINATION
• Integrate a knowledge of preprosthetic surgery and • Alloplastic and allogenic materials available to the reconstructive surgeon
osseointegration into a reconstructive plan for patients with • Which flap where?
maxillofacial defects • Reconstructive techniques on the orbit
• Describe the differences in healing of free and vascularised
autogenous hard and soft tissue grafts in the facial region Observation
• Understand the implications of growth in the paediatric patient on • Reconstructive surgery using vascularised free flaps
reconstructive techniques • Composite reconstruction and secondary deformity
• Understand the effect of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and Case Study
medical conditions on the performance and complications of
reconstructive facial surgery
• Mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap
• Floor of mouth reconstruction using radial forearm flap
• Describe the indications for adjunctive techniques in
• Palatal defect reconstruction using buccal fat pad
reconstructive surgery such as hyperbaric oxygen, BMP, etc
• Reconstruction of floor of mandibular body defect caused by osteoradionecrosis
• Consult, cooperate and discuss with other clinicians as required
• Teach and hand down, encourage other juniors, undergraduates
and graduates on ward rounds, clinics and other classes as
required
• Understand the processes involved in the employing hospital as
well as the funding and administration of the employing hospital
and health department
Al-Moraissi, E.A. & Ellis, E., 2015. Surgical treatment of adult mandibular condylar fractures provides better
outcomes than closed treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery.
Rozeboom, A.V.J. et al., 2017. Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a
systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46(4), pp.456–464.
Subclassification of fractures of the condylar process of the mandible. Loukota RA, Eckelt U, De Bont L,
Rasse M.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;43(1):72-3.
Nomenclature/classification of fractures of the mandibular condylar head. Loukota RA, Neff A, Rasse M.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Sep;48(6):477-8.
Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. Zide MF, Kent JN.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Feb;41(2):89-98.
Al-Kayat, A. & Bramley, P., 1979. A modified pre-auricular approach to the temporomandibular joint and
Journals malar arch. British Journal of Oral Surgery, 17(2), pp.91–103.
Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Patient benefit from endoscopically assisted fixation of condylar neck fractures--a randomized controlled
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery trial.
Schmelzeisen R, Cienfuegos-Monroy R, Schön R, Chen CT, Cunningham L Jr, Goldhahn S.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;67(1):147-58.
Surgery
Schneider, M. et al., 2008. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Treatment and
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Mandibulomaxillary Fixation of Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process: A Randomized, Prospective,
Multicenter Study With Special Evaluation of Fracture Level. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
Journal of Head and Neck Surgery 66(12), pp.2537–2544.
Chrcanovic, B.R., 2012. Open versus closed reduction: Diacapitular fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 16(3), pp.257–265.
Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillo-facial surgery. Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus
B.
J Maxillofac Surg. 1973 Jun;1(2):79-84.
Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. Champy M, Loddé JP,
Schmitt R, Jaeger JH, Muster D.
J Maxillofac Surg. 1978 Feb;6(1):14-21.
Ellis, E., 2014. An algorithm for the treatment of noncondylar mandibular fractures. Journal of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery, 72(5), pp.939–949.
Al-Moraissi, E.A. & Ellis, E., 2014. What method for management of unilateral mandibular angle fractures
has the lowest rate of postoperative complications? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oral
and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a meta-analysis. Regev E, Shiff JS, Kiss A, Fialkov JA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jun;125(6):1753-60.
Bobrowski, A.N., Sonego, C.L. & Chagas, O.L., 2013. Postoperative infection associated with mandibular
angle fracture treatment in the presence of teeth on the fracture line: A systematic review and meta-
analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 42(9), pp.1041–1048. Available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.02.021.
McNamara, Z. et al., 2016. Removal versus retention of asymptomatic third molars in mandibular angle
fractures: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 45(5),
pp.571–574. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.007.
Ellis, E., 2002. Outcomes of patients with teeth in the line of mandibular angle fractures treated with stable
internal fixation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 60(8 SUPPL. 1), pp.863–865.
Cillo, J.E. & Ellis, E., 2014. Management of bilateral mandibular angle fractures with combined rigid and
nonrigid fixation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 72(1), pp.106–111. Available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.008.
A radiological investigation into the age changes of the inferior dental artery. Bradley JC.
Br J Oral Surg. 1975 Jul;13(1):82-90.
Treatment protocol for fractures of the atrophic mandible. Ellis E 3rd, Price C.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;66(3):421-35.
Treatment considerations for comminuted mandibular fractures. Ellis E 3rd, Muniz O, Anand K.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Aug;61(8):861-70.
Koury, M.E. & Kaban, L.B., 1994. The Use of Rigid Internal Fixation in Mandibular Fractures Complicated
by osteomyelitis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, pp.1114–1119.
Mehra, P., Van Heukelom, E. & Cottrell, D.A., 2009. Rigid Internal Fixation of Infected Mandibular
Fractures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 67(5), pp.1046–1051.
Benson, P.D. et al., 2006. The use of immediate bone grafting in reconstruction of clinically infected
mandibular fractures: Bone grafts in the presence of pus. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 64(1),
pp.122–126.
Manolidis, S., 2004. Frontal sinus injuries: Associated injuries and surgical management of 93 patients.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 62(7), pp.882–891.
Bell, R.B. et al., 2007. A Protocol for the Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures Emphasizing Sinus
Preservation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 65(5), pp.825–839.
Smith, T.L. et al., 2002. Endoscopic management of the frontal recess in frontal sinus fractures: a shift in
the paradigm? The Laryngoscope, 112(5), pp.784–90.
Jafari, A. et al., 2015. Spontaneous ventilation of the frontal sinus after fractures involving the frontal
recess. American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, 36(6), pp.837–842.
Al-Qurainy, A. et al., 1991. Midfacial fractures and the eye : the development patients at risk of eye injury of
a system for detecting. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 29, pp.363–367.
Andrews, B.T. et al., 2016. Orbit fractures: Identifying patient factors indicating high risk for ocular and
periocular injury. Laryngoscope, 126, pp.S5–S11.
Magarakis, M. et al., 2012. Ocular injury, visual impairment, and blindness associated with facial fractures:
A systematic literature review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 129(1), pp.227–233.
Yeo, M.S., Ed, M.R.C.S. & Surg, M.M., 2010. Mydriasis during Orbital Floor Fracture Reconstruction : A
Novel Diagnostic and Treatment Algorithm. , 1(212), pp.209–216.
Turvey, T.A. & Golden, B.A., 2012. Orbital Anatomy for the Surgeon. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics
of North America, 24(4), pp.525–536. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2012.08.003.
Post-traumatic orbital reconstruction: anatomical landmarks and the concept of the deep orbit. Evans BT,
Webb AA.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;45(3):183-9.
Clinical recommendations for repair of isolated orbital floor fractures: an evidence-based analysis.
Burnstine MA.
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jul;109(7):1207-10
Biomaterials for repair of orbital floor blowout fractures: a systematic review. Gunarajah DR, Samman N.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;71(3):550-70.
Jaquiery, C. et al., 2007. Reconstruction of orbital wall defects : critical review of 72 patients. International
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, (36), pp.193–199.
Dubois, L. et al., 2015. Controversies in orbital reconstruction - II. Timing of post-traumatic orbital
reconstruction: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(4), pp.433–
440.
Dubois, L. et al., 2016. Controversies in orbital reconstruction - III. Biomaterials for orbital reconstruction: A
review with clinical recommendations. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 45(1), pp.41–
50. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.024.
Mechanisms of global support and posttraumatic enophthalmos: I. The anatomy of the ligament sling and
its relation to intramuscular cone orbital fat.
Manson PN, Clifford CM, Su CT, Iliff NT, Morgan R.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Feb;77(2):193-202.
Studies on enophthalmos: II. The measurement of orbital injuries and their treatment by quantitative
computed tomography.
Manson PN, Grivas A, Rosenbaum A, Vannier M, Zinreich J, Iliff N.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Feb;77(2):203-14.
Prediction of late enophthalmos by volumetric analysis of orbital fractures. Raskin EM, Millman AL, Lubkin
V, della Rocca RC, Lisman RD, Maher EA. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Jan;14(1):19-26.
Prediction of enophthalmos by computed tomography after 'blow out' orbitalfracture. Whitehouse RW,
Batterbury M, Jackson A, Noble JL.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Aug;78(8):618-20.
Reoperative orbital trauma: management of posttraumatic enophthalmos and aberrant eye position.
Holmes S.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2011 Feb;23(1):17-29
The incidence of lower eyelid malposition after facial fracture repair: a retrospective study and meta-
analysis comparing subtarsal, subciliary, and transconjunctival incisions.
Ridgway EB, Chen C, Colakoglu S, Gautam S, Lee BT.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1578-86.
Jacobs, S.M. et al., 2018. Incidence , Risk Factors , and Management of Blindness after Orbital Surgery.
Ophthalmology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.030.
Ellis, E. & Perez, D., 2014. An algorithm for the treatment of isolated zygomatico-orbital fractures. Journal
of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 72(10), pp.1975–1983.
Ellis, E. & Perez, D., 2014. An algorithm for the treatment of isolated zygomatico-orbital fractures. Journal
of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 72(10), pp.1975–1983. Available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.015.
Iii, E.E. & Reddy, L., 2004. Status of the Internal Orbit After Reduction of Zygomaticomaxillary. , pp.275–
283.
Rana, M. et al., 2012. Surgical treatment of zygomatic bone fracture using two points fixation versus three
point fixation-a randomised prospective clinical trial. , pp.1–10.
Kloss, F.R., Stigler, R.G. & Brandsta, A., 2011. Complications related to midfacial fractures : operative
versus non-surgical treatment. , pp.33–37.
Nasal fracture management: minimizing secondary nasal deformities. Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Aug;106(2):266-73.
Management of the medial canthal tendon in nasoethmoid orbital fractures: the importance of the central
fragment in classification and treatment.
Markowitz BL, Manson PN, Sargent L, Vander Kolk CA, Yaremchuk M, Glassman D, Crawley WA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 May;87(5):843-53.
Gruss J, Wyck L, Phillips J, et al. The importance of the zygomatic arch in complex midfacial fracture repair
and correction of posttraumatic orbitozygo- matic deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85:878
Markowitz B, Manson P. Panfacial fractures: organi- zation of treatment. Clin Plast Surg 1989;16:105
Manson P, Clark N, Robertson B, et al. Subunit principles in midface fractures: the importance of sagittal
buttresses, soft-tissue reductions, and sequencing treatment of segmental fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg
1999;103:1287–307
Curtis, W. & Horswell, B.B., 2013. Panfacial fractures. An approach to management. Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery Clinics of North America, 25(4), pp.649–660. Available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2013.07.010.
He D, Zhang Y, Ellis E. Panfacial fractures: analysis of 33 cases treated late. J Oral Maxillofac Surg
2007;65:2459–65.
Yang R, Zhang C, Liu Y, et al. Why should we start from mandibular fractures in the treatment of panfacial
fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:1386–92
Andreasen JO, Jensen SS, Schwartz O, et al. A systematic review of prophylactic antibiotics in the surgical
treatment of maxillofacial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64(11):1664–8. Available
Miles, B.A., Potter, J.K. & Ellis, E., 2006. The efficacy of postoperative antibiotic regimens in the open
treatment of mandibular fractures: A prospective randomized trial. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery, 64(4), pp.576–582.
Ben Simon, G.J. et al., 2005. Orbital cellulitis: A rare complication after orbital blowout fracture.
Ophthalmology, 112(11), pp.2030–2034.
Morris, L.M. & Kellman, R.M., 2014. Are prophylactic antibiotics useful in the management of facial
fractures? Laryngoscope, 124(6), pp.1282–1284.
Ratilal B, Costa J, S.C., 2015. Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing meningitis in patients with basilar skull
fractures (Review). , (4).
Chrcanovic, B.R., 2012. Open versus closed reduction: Mandibular condylar fractures in children. Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery, 16(3), pp.245–255.
Gerbino, G. & Roccia, F., 2010. Surgical Management of Orbital Trapdoor Fracture in a Pediatric
Population. YJOMS, 68(6), pp.1310–1316.
Yang, J.W., Woo, J.E. & An, J.H., 2015. Surgical outcomes of orbital trapdoor fracture in children and
adolescents. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for
Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 43(4), pp.444–7.
Heggie, A.A. et al., 2015. Isolated orbital floor fractures in the paediatric patient : case series and review of
management. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(10), pp.1250–1254. Available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.02.019.
Assessments
applications and complications of soft and • Perform surgical approaches to the orbit such • Discuss the implications of chemotherapy and
hard tissue grafts commonly used in the as: radiotherapy on reconstructive surgery
maxillofacial region Blepharoplasty
• Describe the types, clinical indications, Transconjunctival and Transcaruncular
applications and complications of alloplastic Mid-lid and Subtarsal
and allogeneic materials available to the Infraorbital
maxillofacial surgeon Subcilary
• Discuss of the use of prosthetic devices in Lateral brow, etc
reconstruction • Describe reconstructive techniques and the role
• Differentiate between the variety of intra-oral of adjunctive therapies for osteoradionecrosis
incisions available to the maxillofacial surgeon
• Discuss the role of adjunctive therapies in
reconstructive surgery by medical and dental
practitioners, prosthodontists, speech
pathologists, physiotherapists, dieticians etc
• Understand the processes involved in the employing • Exploration of the orbital soft and hard tissue repair
hospital as well as the funding and administration of the
employing hospital and health department Simulation Laboratory
• Placement of plates for a bi lateral mandibular facture and a complicated fracture in the
Refer below for a complete list of competencies by level. mid-face
Structured Experience
(Trainee to make written notes on patient encounters)
• Explanation of trauma to the family of a patient who attempted to commit suicide
• Explanation of the management of the trauma patient
• Explanation of the postoperative and continuing management of the trauma patient
including any rehabilitation required
Resources
Textbooks Specific articles
Fonseca R, Barber HD, Powers M, Frost DE (2012). Oral Subclassification of fractures of the condylar process of the mandible.
and Maxillofacial Trauma (4th ed). Saunders. Loukota RA, Eckelt U, De Bont L, Rasse M.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;43(1):72-3.
Ward Booth P, Eppley B, Schmelzeisen R (2011).
Maxillofacial Trauma and Esthetic Facial Reconstruction Nomenclature/classification of fractures of the mandibular condylar head.
(2nd ed). Saunders. Loukota RA, Neff A, Rasse M.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Sep;48(6):477-8.
Hammer B (1995). Orbital Fractures: Diagnosis, Operative
Treatment, Secondary Corrections. Hogrefe & Huber. Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures.
Zide MF, Kent JN.
Ellis E, Zide ME (2005). Surgical Approaches to the Facial J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Feb;41(2):89-98.
Skeleton (2nd ed). Lippencott Williams & Wilkins.
Mandibular condyle fractures: a consensus.
Journals Bos RR, Ward Booth RP, de Bont LG.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Apr;37(2):87-9.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment and mandibulomaxillary fixation
of fractures of the mandibular condylar process: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery with special evaluation of fracture level.
Schneider M, Erasmus F, Gerlach KL, Kuhlisch E, Loukota RA, Rasse M, Schubert J,
Oral and Maxillofacial Clinics of North America Terheyden H, Eckelt U.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;66(12):2537-44.
Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process-a prospective
randomized multi-centre study.
Patient benefit from endoscopically assisted fixation of condylar neck fractures--a randomized
controlled trial.
Schmelzeisen R, Cienfuegos-Monroy R, Schön R, Chen CT, Cunningham L Jr, Goldhahn S.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;67(1):147-58.
Occlusal results after open or closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar
process.
Ellis E 3rd, Simon P, Throckmorton GS.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Mar;58(3):260-8.
A radiological investigation into the age changes of the inferior dental artery.
Bradley JC.
Br J Oral Surg. 1975 Jul;13(1):82-90.
Management of the medial canthal tendon in nasoethmoid orbital fractures: the importance of
the central fragment in classification and treatment.
Markowitz BL, Manson PN, Sargent L, Vander Kolk CA, Yaremchuk M, Glassman D, Crawley
WA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 May;87(5):843-53.
Post-traumatic orbital reconstruction: anatomical landmarks and the concept of the deep orbit.
Evans BT, Webb AA.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;45(3):183-9.
Studies on enophthalmos: II. The measurement of orbital injuries and their treatment by
quantitative computed tomography.
Manson PN, Grivas A, Rosenbaum A, Vannier M, Zinreich J, Iliff N.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Feb;77(2):203-14.
The incidence of lower eyelid malposition after facial fracture repair: a retrospective study and
meta-analysis comparing subtarsal, subciliary, and transconjunctival incisions.
Ridgway EB, Chen C, Colakoglu S, Gautam S, Lee BT.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1578-86.
Surgery on orbital floor fractures. Influence of time of repair and fracture size.
Hawes MJ, Dortzbach RK.
Ophthalmology. 1983 Sep;90(9):1066-70.
Assessments
Radiology • Request the correct radiology for assessing Surgical approaches to the frontal sinus
Operative priorities oral and maxillofacial Injury Classification
Intensive care priorities • Manage dentoalveolar injuries • Treatment of frontal sinus fractures
• Carry out a neurological evaluation and • Manage mandibular fractures • Manage and treat patients with nasal fractures
management of the trauma patient Statistics associated with mandibular injuries Anatomy
Initial Assessment Classification of mandibular fractures Patterns of injury
Detailed management Diagnosis of mandibular fractures Treatment
Grading the severity of injury Glasgow Coma Score General principles in the treatment of • Manage and treat injuries to structures requiring
(GCS) mandibular fractures special treatment, salivary ducts, trigeminal and
Diagnostic studies of head injury • Manage soft tissue injuries facial nerve injury
Special problems in head injury Anatomy of the skin • Classify the pathophysiology of gunshot wounds
Spinal cord injury Suturing • Assess and treat a patient suffering from gunshot
• Describe in detail the applied anatomy of the head Suture materials wounds and implement an appropriate and effective
and neck • Classification and management of soft tissue treatment plan
Skin lines and the lines of Langer wounds • Analyse the significant issues in relation to the
Scalp • Classification of bullets and firearms management and treatment of fractures in the
Skin of the face • Wound ballistics growing patient
Facial bones and the facial skeleton
• The physics of ballistics General considerations in the management of
Lower face
Extra-oral surgical approaches • Classification of gunshot wounds paediatric patients
• Treatment of gunshot wounds Incidence
Intra-oral surgical approaches Clinical examination
Muscles • Shot gun wounds to the head and neck
Radiographic examination
Arterial blood supply to the head and neck • Indicate the appropriate use of bio-materials
in facial trauma management Fracture management
Veins of the head and neck The late management and treatment of facial
Neuro anatomy • Implantable materials
fractures
Regional anatomy • TMJ reconstruction
• Manage and treat avulsive oral and maxillofacial
Nasal anatomy • Analyse the significant issues in relation to the injuries
Parotid region management of facial fractures in the geriatric
Assessment
Submandibular gland patient
Goals of reconstruction
Floor of the mouth Tissue changes in the ageing face Surgical approaches – soft tissues
• Evaluate the radiographs and imaging obtained Systemic considerations
• Indicate the appropriate use of oral and maxillofacial
Plain radiographs Special considerations in the management of
prosthetics and treatment for the trauma patient
CT scanning the geriatric patient (Blood supply to the
Intra oral rehabilitation
MRI evaluation mandible and the management of the atrophic
Extra oral rehabilitation
Ultrasound mandibular fracture)
Facial prostheses
• A thorough knowledge of the principles of internal Bone grafting of the atrophic ridge
Implantology for the trauma patient
fixation of facial fractures Postoperative complications
• Diagnose and effectively treat infections in the
AO principles (rigid and compression fixation) trauma patient
Champy principles (monocortical fixation)
Biomechanics of the facial skeleton
Journals & web based materials Three-year stability of open-bite correction by 1-piece maxillary osteotomy.
The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Espeland L, Dowling PA, Mobarak KA, Stenvik A.
Orthognathic Surgery Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):60-6.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Long-term stability of surgical open-bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy.
Orthopaedics Proffit WR, Bailey LJ, Phillips C, Turvey TA.
Angle Orthod. 2000 Apr;70(2):112-7.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Long-term stability of anterior open-bite closure with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Fontes AM, Joondeph DR, Bloomquist DS, Greenlee GM, Wallen TR, Huang GJ.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Dec;142(6):792-800.
The Cranio-maxillofacial Hyperguide -
www.cmf.hyperguides.com Anterior open bite malocclusion: stability of maxillary repositioning using rigid internal fixation.
Arpornmaeklong P, Heggie AA
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aust Ortho J. 2000; 16:69-81
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Skeletal stability following maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement.
Arpornmaeklong P, Shand JM, Heggie AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 33: 656-663
Stability of open bite correction with sagittal split osteotomy and closing rotation of the mandible.
Stansbury CD, Evans CA, Miloro M, BeGole EA, Morris DE.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;68(1):149-59.
Stability of open bite correction with sagittal split osteotomy and closing rotation of the mandible.
Stansbury CD, Evans CA, Miloro M, BeGole EA, Morris DE.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;68(1):149-59.
Closing anterior open bites by intruding molars with titanium miniplate anchorage.
Sherwood KH, Burch JG, Thompson WJ.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Dec;122(6):593-600.
In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Foley WL, Beckman TW.
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1992;7(3):147-51.
Comparison of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery: a two-year multi-
center randomized controlled trial.
van Bakelen NB, Buijs GJ, Jansma J, de Visscher JG, Hoppenreijs TJ, Bergsma JE, Stegenga B, Bos
RR.
J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12):1100-5.
Simultaneous removal of third molars during sagittal split osteotomies: the case against.
Schwartz HC.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Sep;62(9):1147-9.
Removal of third molars with sagittal split osteotomies: the case for.
Precious DS.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Sep;62(9):1144-6.
Variations in the anatomical dimensions of the mandibular ramus and the presence of third molars: its
effect on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Beukes J, Reyneke JP, Becker PJ.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;42(3):303-7.
The presence of mandibular third molars during sagittal split osteotomies does not increase the risk of
complications.
Doucet JC, Morrison AD, Davis BR, Gregoire CE, Goodday R, Precious DS.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;70(8):1935-43.
Effects of dextrans, heparin and hyperbaric oxygen on mandibular tissue damage after osteotomy in
an experimental system.
Nilsson LP, Granström G, Röckert HO.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Feb;16(1):77-89.
Prospective study of the incidence of serious posterior maxillary haemorrhage during a tuberosity
osteotomy in low level Le Fort I operations.
O'Regan B, Bharadwaj G.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;45(7):538-42.
Neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a
systematic review.
Colella G, Cannavale R, Vicidomini A, Lanza A.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;65(9):1707-15.
Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery: a review of 655 patients.
Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Oct;59(10):1128-36
Microsurgical repair of the inferior alveolar nerve: success rate and factors that adversely affect
outcome.
Bagheri SC, Meyer RA, Cho SH, Thoppay J, Khan HA, Steed MB.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;70(8):1978-90.
Cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: Experimental studies.
Swennen G, Dempf R, Schliephake H.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Apr;31(2):123-35.
Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction
osteogenesis: an evidence-based review.
Ow A, Cheung LK.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov;67(11):2344-53.
Wound healing after multisegmental Le Fort I osteotomy and transection of the descending palatine
vessels.
Bell WH, You ZH, Finn RA, Fields RT.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Dec;53(12):1425-33
A radiological investigation into the age changes of the inferior dental artery.
Bradley JC.
Br J Oral Surg. 1975 Jul;13(1):82-90.
The clinical significance of age changes in the vascular supply to the mandible.
Bradley JC.
Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(Suppl 1):71-6.
Cephalometric measurement of upper airway length correlates with the presence and severity of
obstructive sleep apnea.
Susarla SM, Abramson ZR, Dodson TB, Kaban LB.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Nov;68(11):2846-55.
Craniofacial structure and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome--a qualitative analysis and meta-
analysis of the literature.
Miles PG, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, Forrest TD, Rockette HE Jr.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Feb;109(2):163-72.
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a surgical protocol for dynamic upper airway reconstruction.
Riley RW, Powell NB, Guilleminault C.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Jul;51(7):742-7
The efficacy of surgical modifications of the upper airway in adults with obstructive sleep apnea
syndrome.
Sher AE, Schechtman KB, Piccirillo JF.
Sleep. 1996 Feb;19(2):156-77.
Maxillomandibular advancement for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review
and meta-analysis.
Holty JE, Guilleminault C.
Sleep Med Rev. 2010 Oct;14(5):287-97.
Surgical modifications of the upper airway for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: a systematic review
and meta-analysis.
Caples SM, Rowley JA, Prinsell JR, Pallanch JF, Elamin MB, Katz SG, Harwick JD.
Sleep. 2010 Oct;33(10):1396-407.
Dental and skeletal changes following surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
Lagravère MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jun;35(6):481-7.
The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and
extension.
Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C.
Head Face Med. 2007 Apr 30;3:21.
Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a
systematic review.
Joss CU, Vassalli IM.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Feb;67(2):301-13.
Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy setback surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic
review.
Joss CU, Vassalli IM.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Aug;66(8):1634-43.
Intraoperative diagnosis of condylar sag after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Reyneke JP, Ferretti C.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Aug;40(4):285-92.
Postoperative stability following bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy based on amount of
setback.
Jung HD, Jung YS, Kim SY, Kim DW, Park HS.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;51(8):822-6.
Maxillary quadrangular Le Fort I osteotomy: long-term skeletal stability and clinical outcome.
Stork JT, Kim RH, Regennitter FJ, Keller EE.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;42(12):1533-46.
Soft tissue profile changes after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback: a systematic
review.
Joss CU, Joss-Vassalli IM, Bergé SJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Nov;68(11):2792-801.
Soft tissue profile changes after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement: a
systematic review.
Joss CU, Joss-Vassalli IM, Kiliaridis S, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jun;68(6):1260-9.
Long-term stability and prediction of soft tissue changes after LeFort I surgery.
Hack GA, de Mol van Otterloo JJ, Nanda R.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Dec;104(6):544-55.
Incidence and recovery of neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in
different age groups: retrospective study of 263 patients.
JP Verweij, G. Mensink, M. Fiocco, JPR Van Merkesteyn
Impact of orthognathic surgery on oral health-related quality of life in patients with jaw deformities
K. Kurabe, T, Kojima, Y. Kato, I. Saito, T. Kobayashi
Int. J. OralMaxillofac.surg. 2016
Orthgnathic surgery in patients over 40 years of age: indications and special considerations
ZS Peacock, CCY Lee, KP Klein, LB Kaban
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72: 1995-2004, 2014
Accuracy of virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery with aid of CAD/CAM fabricated
surgical splint-A novel 3D analyzing algorithm.
Chin SJ1, Wilde F2, Neuhaus M1, Schramm A2, Gellrich NC1, Rana M3.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Dec;45(12):1962-1970. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
Assessments
adaptation Autologous materials - bone, PRP and BMP Obstructive sleep apnoea
• Describe the anatomy of the region with Frozen bone, lyophilised bone and cartilage Post traumatic injuries
specific reference to its blood supply Alloplastic materials, etc • Perform access osteotomies to the skull
• Identify the methods of fixation used in • Appropriate communication to a patient of the risks, base as required
orthognathic surgery including and benefits of the proposed procedures • Understand the role of distraction
waferless/splintless surgery; the biomaterials osteogenesis in mandibular and maxillary
used, and indicate possible risks of using those osteotomies
biomaterials and techniques
A trainee eligible to sit for the FRACDS (OMS) should be able to: Learning Portfolio Checklist
Examine and diagnose a patient with facial pain
Examine and interpret appropriate investigations for the patient with facial pain
• Describe the pathophysiological basis and various theories
Plan a course of treatment for the facial pain patient, surgical and non-surgical
of facial pain
The chronic pain clinic and the management of facial pain
• Understand the essential differences between acute and
chronic facial pain and the psychological implications
Logbook
• Be competent in the interviewing and examination of a Trainee to log –
person presenting with facial pain
• Use of cryotherapy in chronic facial pain (5)
• Order and accurately interpret appropriate investigations in
order to diagnose and treat patients with facial pain
• Therapeutic use of nerve blocks in facial pain (5)
• Describe the differential diagnosis of facial pain
• Microneurosurgery in the management of facial pain (5)
(Number refers to category in Logbook)
• Review the pharmacological mechanisms of pain control
• Identify and acknowledge the multidisciplinary setting in the Literature Review
management of facial pain
• Pathophysiological basis and various theories of facial pain
• Understand the role of pharmacotherapy and counseling in
the treatment of a wide range of pain syndromes
• The role of diagnostic blocks in the management of facial pain
• Appreciate the limited but specific role of surgery in the
• The use of cryotherapy in the management of facial pain
management of pain syndromes • The pharmacotherapy of facial pain
• Review neurosurgical procedures for facial pain management
Refer below for a complete list of competencies by level. • Review nerve repairs (inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerves)
Case Study
• Manage the multiply operated TMJ patient with facial pain
• Involvement with a facial pain clinic
• Trigeminal nerve repairs
Tutorial
• Differential diagnosis of chronic facial pain
• The management of chronic facial pain e.g.: pharmacotherapy and counselling
• Psychological aspects of facial pain
• Microsurgery in the management of trigeminal nerve pain
• Role of nerve repairs – for post traumatic neuromas
Resources
Warfield C, Bajwa Z (2004). Principles and Practice of Management of burning mouth syndrome: systematic review and management recommendations.
Pain Medicine (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill. Patton LL, Siegel MA, Benoliel R, De Laat A.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103 Suppl:S39.e1-13.
Oleson J, Tfelt-Hansen P, Welch KMA, Goadsby PJ,
Ramadan NM (2005). The Headaches. LWW. Burning mouth syndrome.
Torgerson RR.
Dermatol Ther. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):291-8.
Journals
Journal of Orofacial Pain Practice parameter: the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-
based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of
Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies.
Gronseth G, Cruccu G, Alksne J, Argoff C, Brainin M, Burchiel K, Nurmikko T, Zakrzewska JM.
Neurology. 2008 Oct 7;71(15):1183-90.
Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review):
report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
Silberstein SD.
Neurology. 2000 Sep 26;55(6):754-62
EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine--revised report of an EFNS task force.
Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, Linde M, May A, Sándor PS; European Federation of
Neurological Societies.
Eur J Neurol. 2009 Sep;16(9):968-81.
EFNS guideline on the treatment of tension-type headache - report of an EFNS task force.
Bendtsen L, Evers S, Linde M, Mitsikostas DD, Sandrini G, Schoenen J; EFNS.
Assessments
Suggested Tutorials
• Clinical assessment of the TMD patient and interpretation of imaging
• Assessment & management of condylar resorption
• Treatment planning for TMD patients: conservative versus surgical
• Surgical approaches to the TMJ
• Options for TMJ reconstruction or replacement
Single puncture versus standard double needle arthrocentesis for the management
of temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review.
Nagori SA, Roy Chowdhury SK, Thukral H, Jose A, Roychoudhury A.
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Oct;45(10):810-818. doi: 10.1111/joor.12665. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Review.
Combined or Staged Temporomandibular Joint and Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with
Internal Derangement and Dentofacial Deformities.
Kim S, Keith DA.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2018 Aug;30(3):351-354.
Evaluation of condylar resorption rates after orthognathic surgery in class II and III dentofacial
deformities: A systematic review.
Nunes de Lima V, Faverani LP, Santiago JF Jr, Palmieri C Jr, Magro Filho O, Pellizzer EP.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;46(4):668-673.
Adaptability of stock TMJ prosthesis to joints that were previously treated with custom joint
prosthesis.
Abramowicz S, Barbick M, Rose SP, Dolwick MF.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):518-20.
Retrospective study of facial nerve function following temporomandibular joint arthroplasty using
the endaural approach.
Liu F, Giannakopoulos H, Quinn PD, Granquist EJ.
Open versus arthroscopic surgery for the management of internal derangement of the
temporomandibular joint: a meta-analysis of the literature.
Al-Moraissi EA.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jun;44(6):763-70.
Wolford LM. Twenty-year follow up on a patient fitted temporomandibular joint prosthesis: the
Techmedica/ TMJ concepts device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:952-960
Assessments
AOP – ARTHROCENTESIS
FINAL EXAMINATION
• Describe the correlation between clinical • Discuss the history of prosthetic reconstruction of the benign & malignant pathology of the TMJ
findings and the investigations TMJ • Describe the reconstruction of the TMJ with a
• Perform reduction of a dislocated mandible • Discuss the management of idiopathic condylar range of flaps or grafts
• Discuss the non-surgical management of resorption • Manage common intra- and postoperative
TMD • Discuss the management of chronic pain following complications of temporomandibular surgery
• Discuss the indications for surgical TMD surgery • Describe the indications, techniques and
management of TMD planning for total joint replacements
• Discuss the management of TMD in a • Discuss the medical and surgical management
multi-disciplinary setting patients with pain and dysfunction syndromes
after unsuccessful TMJ surgery
• Discuss the diagnosis, management and
prognosis of TMD with the patients and their
families
A trainee eligible to sit for the FRACDS (OMS) should be able to: Learning Portfolio Checklist
Make an appropriate selection of articulator and accurately
• Manage the needs of patients requiring Maxillofacial prosthetics mount models
• Perform the various techniques available to the OMS in order to treat surgical Perform model surgery for orthognathic patients
Perform model surgery for trauma patients
• deformity of the oral and maxillofacial region
Design and Construct splints for palatal surgery and other
• Correctly determine and plan utilisation of such techniques during treatment procedures
planning, operative surgery, and post-surgical rehabilitation Use Biomodels in OMS
• Carry out the appropriate steps and current laboratory procedures involved in
maxillofacial model surgery and splint preparation Logbook
• Perform implant therapy, including those pre-prosthetic procedures relevant to Trainee to log and document experience of at least 1 case in all
extra-oral and intra-oral implant placement, including incorporation into categories listed in the Learning Portfolio Checklist above
orthognathic and reconstructive surgical procedures
• Identify the resources needed to establish an appropriate working laboratory Case Presentation plus Discussion
facility in new or under-serviced area • Articulation and planning for a bimaxillary osteotomy
• Formulate treatment plans which include the appropriate application of recent
technological developments, including specifically: Literature Review / Essay Question / Tutorial
• • Discuss cthe utilisation of 3D biomodels in contemporary oral
ustom-made skeletal prosthetic parts and maxillofacial surgery
• • Discuss 3computer simulation in orthognathic surgical
D biomodelling planning
• Have a working knowledge/understanding of computer-aided navigational • Discuss use of alloplastic implants in reconstructive oral and
treatment planning and surgery maxillofacial surgery
• Consult, cooperate and discuss with other clinicians as required
• Teach and hand down, encourage other juniors, undergraduates and graduates
on ward rounds, clinics and other classes as required
• Understand the processes involved in the employing hospital as well as the
funding and administration of the employing hospital and health department
Resources
Textbooks Specific articles
Beumer J, Marunick MT, Esposito SJ (2011). Maxillofacial Tissue engineering technology and its possible applications in oral and maxillofacial
Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Management of surgery.
Cancer-Related, Acquired, and Congenital Defects of the Payne KF, Balasundaram I, Deb S, Di Silvio L, Fan KF.
Head and Neck (3rd ed). Quintessence. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;52(1):7-15.
Assessments
AOP ARTICULATION OF
MODELS AND SPLINT
CONSTRUCTION
CP AND D USE OF COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY IN PLANNING
AOP NAVIGATION IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL
SURGERY
FINAL EXAMINATION
A trainee eligible to sit for the FRACDS (OMS) should be able to:
Learning Portfolio Checklist
• Describe the mechanism of laser production
Complete a course on laser technology
• Apply this technology for therapeutic use Use of lasers in the treatment of benign and malignant lesions of the maxillofacial
• Describe the mechanisms of cryotherapy and its use in oral Region
and maxillofacial surgery Use of cryotherapy in the maxillofacial Region
• Apply these technologies in oral and maxillofacial surgery Treatment planning using virtual techniques in the computer and navigation to the
• Be familiar and be able to use endoscopic approaches to patient
surgery in the maxillofacial region, eg. endoscopic sinus Use of Computer planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery
surgery, endoscopic fracture surgery, arthroscopy of the TMJ
• Diagnose and select cases suited to endoscopic, laser and Logbook
cryotherapeutic surgical techniques Trainee to log –
• Effectively apply endoscopic, laser and cryotherapeutic • Use of laser therapy (5, 6)
surgical techniques to the spectrum of applications in both • use of cryotherapy (5, 6)
general use and specific applications in the maxillofacial • use of the arthroscope in the TMJ (13)
region • use of the endoscope in sinus disease (14)
• Apply the techniques of computer aided navigational surgery • endoscopically assisted trauma surgery (4)
in the oral and maxillofacial region (Number refers to category in Logbook)
• Apply the techniques of computer planning in the oral and
maxillofacial region Literature Review
• Consult, cooperate and discuss with other clinicians as • The use of lasers in Maxillofacial Surgery
required • The use of cryosurgery in Maxillofacial surgery
• Teach and hand down, encourage other juniors, • The use of endoscopic surgery in the Maxillofacial Region, arthroscope, endoscope
undergraduates and graduates on ward rounds, clinics and • Virtual planning of surgical procedure
other classes as required • The use of navigation in maxillofacial surgery
• Understand the processes involved in the employing hospital
as well as the funding and administration of the employing Case Study
hospital and health department • Use of navigation techniques for TMJ release or ankylosis or tumour resection
• Secondary orbital reconstruction
Refer below for a complete list of competencies by level
Tutorial
• Plan an orthodontic case using either Quick Ceph or Dolphin technology (CDM)
• Carry out model surgery following the STO production (CDM)
Resources
All hospitals expect surgeons and trainees to complete a laser course before using the laser. Such a course should be completed within the first 2 years.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic
review of the literature.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;38(6):609-25.
Applications of cone beam computed tomography in the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Quereshy FA, Savell TA, Palomo JM.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;66(4):791-6.
Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.
Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):106-14.
Clinical indications and perspectives for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in oral and
maxillofacial surgery.
Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Heinrich S, Schmelzle R, Heiland M.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103(3):412-7.
BMP
A comprehensive clinical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (INFUSE Bone
Graft).
McKay WF, Peckham SM, Badura JM.
Int Orthop. 2007 Dec;31(6):729-34.
De novo bone induction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in maxillary sinus
floor augmentation.
Boyne PJ, Lilly LC, Marx RE, Moy PK, Nevins M, Spagnoli DB, Triplett RG.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Dec;63(12):1693-707.
Randomized study evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for extraction socket
augmentation.
Fiorellini JP, Howell TH, Cochran D, Malmquist J, Lilly LC, Spagnoli D, Toljanic J, Jones A, Nevins M.
J Periodontol. 2005 Apr;76(4):605-13.
PRP
The biology of platelet-rich plasma and its application in oral surgery: literature review.
Nikolidakis D, Jansen JA.
Botox
Clinical use of botulinum toxins in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Majid OW.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;39(3):197-207.
Endoscopy
Laser
Interventional laser surgery: an effective surgical and diagnostic tool in oral precancer management.
Thomson PJ, Wylie J.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Apr;31(2):145-53.
The results of CO2 laser surgery in patients with oral leukoplakia: a 25 year follow up.
van der Hem PS, Nauta JM, van der Wal JE, Roodenburg JL.
Oral Oncol. 2005 Jan;41(1):31-7.
Assessments
4 C - SECTION 4
The College is committed to providing basic training and the resources in cultural competence and its
relevance to the provision of health care in Australian and New Zealand.
The following Cultural Competency and Safety resources are available on the College’s Learning
Management Software:
1 D - SECTION 1
a. First year of OMS training - A minimum total of twelve (12) months (full time equivalent) in a hospital
post accredited by the Board of Studies – Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Preferably six (6) or twelve
(12) months will be spent in one position
b. SST Examination
c. Completion of the three skills courses: ASSET, EMST and CCrISP are expected to be undertaken
by the end of the first year of OMS training and must be completed by the 31 October of the second
year of OMS training (OMS 2).
Examination Requirements
The SST Examination is held annually and eligibility to sit the SST Examination is dependent upon all
fees being paid.
The SST Examination comprises a Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) examination, a written examination
comprising Short Answer Questions (SAQ) and a Clinical and Oral Viva Voce Examination.
The SST Examination is to be undertaken by eligible candidates (with full medical and dental
registration) during the first clinical OMS training year (OMS 1) from 2011 onwards. From 2019 onwards
eligible candidates are able to sit the SST Examination prior to entry to the OMS Training program.
Candidates must enrol for the SST Examination and pay the prescribed fee prior to the enrolment closing
date.
c. Those who meet the criteria to apply for selection to the program and who are currently in their
SIG year can apply for eligibility to sit the SST examination from 2019 onwards. The Eligibility
Criteria for OMS Training must be satisfied at the time of sitting the SST examination.
In the event of not being awarded a pass in the SST Examination, a Trainee (i.e. a Candidates already
accepted into the program) may be deemed eligible to take the examination for not more than TWO (2)
further diets. The trainee cannot commence OMS 2 until a pass in the SST examination has been
achieved. The time taken between the completion of OMS 1 year and the commencement of OMS 2
year will not be considered for accredited training time.
Trainees are advised that with the introduction of the SST Examination, it is no longer a requirement to
hold a pass in the College Primary Examination. Trainees and those who complete the SST Examination
will no longer need to present for the Primary Examination.
1. This examination is conducted bi-nationally between Australia and New Zealand in the specialist
field of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for trainees in the first of the four-year training program.
2. Each candidate presenting for examination has completed both dental and medical degrees
together with a medical intern registration year and an accredited year of Surgery-in-General
(with the exception of the second category in 1, and from 2019 onwards, candidates in their SIG
year who meet eligibility).
3. The examination tests a candidate’s basic surgical science knowledge in Anatomy, Pathology,
Microbiology, Pharmacology and Physiology together with the level of practical experience
accumulated in caring for the “Surgical Patient”. Examiners are asked to be familiar with the
syllabus and curriculum for training contained in the Handbook.
4. The examination is designed to assess whether the candidate has the appropriate knowledge
and experience to care for the surgical patient. A pass in the examination is a requirement for
training. If a candidate is unsuccessful, another year in an approved post is required prior to
undertaking the examination again. A maximum of three (3) attempts will be permitted.
5. Examiners have a comprehensive knowledge of basic surgical science and practical patient care
and have been selected by the Board of Studies (OMS).
6. The Chairman of the Panel of Examiners will call a compulsory meeting of all Examiners on the
day preceding the commencement of the Clinical and Oral Viva Voce Examinations to
standardise the format and components of the examination which is to follow. This includes
review and finalisation of assessment rubrics.
7. Immediately following the last examination session, the Chairman will call a further meeting of
the Court of Examiners at which time the marks of all candidates are appraised. The Registrar
(OMS) will then arrange for the notification of results to the candidates according to College
guidelines.
8. The examination is in three parts:
i. MCQ examination
2 hours duration, basic surgical science
ii. SAQ examination
50 minutes duration; consisting of 5 short answer questions (10 minutes each)
iii. Clinical examination
5 stations (20 minutes each):
1. Anatomy
2. Acute care
3. Ward scenario
4. Critical care
5. Surgical skills
9. The MCQ examination contains single answer, relationship-analysis and variable response
questions
10. The Clinical and Oral Viva Voce Examination comprises various stations. The tasks required
include, but are not limited to, history taking and examination, demonstration of practical
technical skills, the application of basic science knowledge, data acquisition and analysis.
11. The MCQ and SAQ examinations must be taken concurrently with Clinical and Oral Viva Voce
Examination.
12. To allow progression to OMS 2 Trainees are required to gain a pass in the SST examination. A
pass in the SST examination is awarded to candidates who pass EACH of the following sections:
MCQ examination, SAQ examination, Critical care station, Clinical and Oral Viva Voce
examination overall.
13. By the end of OMS 2 Trainees must complete all necessary courses and satisfactory
assessments, in order to allow progression to OMS 3.
To successfully pass the SST examination, a candidate must achieve the passing standard in EACH of
the following sections at the same examination diet:
• MCQ examination
• SAQ examination
• Critical care station
• Clinical examination - Oral Viva Voce examination
The examination passing standard for each of these examinations is set by the relevant examination
review panel using formal standard setting methods. The ‘passing standard’ is reviewed at each
examination series and may be adjusted with consideration to differences in the difficulty of
examinations and to maintain the standards. The minimum score required to pass may be set by
applying an error adjustment to the ‘passing standard’ score. For the clinical examinations, candidates
must meet the passing standard in the Critical care station as well as meet the overall passing standard
for the Clinical examination overall.
As all components of the SST Examination are blueprinted to curriculum modules and proficiency
domains, minimum passing standards may also be set based on the aggregation of these. Therefore,
candidates must also achieve the passing standard across modules and proficiencies
The highest performing candidate in each diet of the examination will be identified by averaging both
sections of the examination (written and viva) so that a percentage out of 100% is achieved. The
Registrar (OMS) will notify ANZAOMS of the result.
Examiners
Examiners for the SST Examination are approved by the College and are listed on the website prior to
the Examination.
Observers
An observer may be present, and if a candidate has an objection to this, he/she should advise the
Registrar (OMS) before the examination. Whilst advance notification is preferred, candidates retain the
right to object to an observer being present at the time of the examination. The Chair of the Examination
Panel or the Registrar (OMS) may elect to observe any segment of the Examination.
Course Requirements
Trainees are required to complete three (3) skills courses by the end of the second year of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery training. These courses, listed below, are particularly relevant to the first year of
OMS training and the SST Examination. Trainees are expected to complete them by the end of the first
year of OMS training whenever possible; they must be completed by the end of the second year (OMS
2). These courses are conducted by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) and relevant
information, current course dates and fees can be found on the website www.surgeons.org.
• Australian and New Zealand Surgical Skills Education and Training (ASSET)
• Early Management of Severe Trauma course (EMST)
• Care of the Critically Ill Surgical Patient course (CCrISP)
For progression through Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery training, it is necessary to ensure that trainees
have acquired sufficient knowledge and practical experience in applying basic sciences in the
management of the surgical patient. It is required that competence is demonstrated in general medical
assessment, the diagnosis of common peri-operative complications, and the initiation of appropriate
investigations and treatment. It is expected that candidates will have a reasonable level of basic surgical
skills and a competence in clinical care.
• Anatomy
• Physiology and immunology
• Pathology and neoplasia
• Applied pathology and tissue response to injury
• Microbiology
• Pharmacology and therapeutics
• Principles in the management of the trauma patient
• Management of the critically ill surgical patient
• Surgical skills and clinical care
1.1.2 ANATOMY
The candidate should demonstrate an adequate level of knowledge, understanding and application of
anatomy, particularly in the areas of:
• the genesis and implications of physical signs
• investigative procedures – radiology, organ imaging and endoscopy, e.g. identification of structures
on radiographs or CT scans
• the principles of surgical approaches, e.g. incision and drainage of facial space infections
• the genesis of operative complications, e.g. the maxillary artery and other vessels in mid-facial
osteotomies, the facial nerve in trauma
• the principles underlying the healing processes e.g. in bone or peripheral nerves
• the basic mechanisms of structure and function, e.g. the organisation of the muscle spindle
• a detailed understanding of head and neck anatomy.
1.1.4 IMMUNOLOGY
The candidate should demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the principles of Pathology and
Neoplasia particularly as applied to:
• the general pathological mechanisms (degenerative, reactive and neoplastic) underlying common
disease, including;
1) aetiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, investigation and natural history
2) how these may be modified by the appropriate use of therapeutic agents
• common and important issues in systemic pathology so far as;
o a given lesion exemplifies a basic pathological process, e.g. anaphylaxis is an example of
hypersensitivity reactions; myocardial infarction in atherosclerosis; mucoepidermoid
carcinoma as an example of neoplasia
o disorders of a given system which are likely to be encountered in surgical practice, e.g.
post-operative pneumonia, thromboembolic disease
• Laboratory medicine so as to make the optimum use of diagnostic services e.g. microscopy and
sensitivity testing, blood gas analysis.
• the more common pathological processes from photographs of gross specimens and the
histopathological features of basic processes from photomicrographs
The candidate should demonstrate knowledge and understanding of neoplasia with specific detailed
emphasis upon:
This area of the syllabus concentrates on the understanding of factors in the aetiology, pathogenesis,
epidemiology and natural history of common diseases, and their implications in the management of
surgical patients.
1.1.7 MICROBIOLOGY
This area involves an expected knowledge of major therapeutic areas and major drug groups.
Candidates should be able to apply basic pharmacological principles and understand such information
as set out in a mini Pharmacopoeia. Candidates should understand the mechanism of drug actions and
side-effects, routes of administration and bioavailability, and metabolism and clearance. Detailed
knowledge is expected for medications commonly used in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical practice.
For example, for antibiotic and antifungal therapy candidates should demonstrate knowledge and
understanding of:
In consolidating the principles of EMST (Early Management of Severe Trauma) candidates should be
able to:
In consolidating the principles of CCrISP (Care of the Critically ILL Surgical Patient) candidates should
be able to:
• suturing techniques and the properties and indications for different suture materials
• wound care and management of infected wounds
• use of drains and surgical dressings
• knowledge of common surgical instruments and operating theatre equipment e.g. diathermy
• use of local anaesthetics including agents and side-effects
• pre-operative assessment of patients, understanding of co-morbidities and risks, and appropriate
investigations
• peri-operative management; fluids, analgesia, post-operative care
• assessment of patients presenting with facial emergencies and describe a management approach
e.g. facial and dento-alveolar trauma, facial and oral infections, oral and nasal haemorrhage.
1 E - SECTION 1
When trainees have completed their training, or are in the last 18 months of training they may apply for
Assessment of Eligibility for the Final Examination in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
To be eligible for the Examination, candidates must:
An application form for Assessment of Eligibility can be downloaded from the College website.
a. Annual Logbook Summary Sheets and a Final Logbook Summary Sheet (or part thereof) (refer to
Appendix 23 and 24) - if they have not been submitted to the College office prior to this application.
Logbook Summary Sheets must be verified by the Director of Training.
b. Copies of satisfactory Formative Assessment Reports, Case Presentation plus Discussion Reports,
and Assessment of Operative Process Reports for any training completed after January 2007 – if
they have not been submitted to the College office prior to this application.
The Training Committee usually meets in mid-June. Trainees will be notified promptly after this meeting,
advising of the outcome of the application. Trainees who have been successful must then enrol for the
Examination prior to the closing date as published on the College website.
Once a candidate has received notification from the College that they are eligible for the Final
Examination in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, he/she may complete the examination enrolment form
and forward it to the College office, with the prescribed fee.
For the examination enrolment date and fee refer to the Dates and Fees sections at the front of this
Handbook. An enrolment form can be downloaded from here.
Enrolled candidates will receive advice from the College regarding the examination schedule.
The Final Examination consists of four sections (written papers, clinical examinations, surgical anatomy
viva, and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Vivas) (Fig 1.3). The two (2) written papers are held on two (2)
consecutive days two (2) to three (3) weeks in advance of the commencement of the oral examinations.
Each candidate must sit all of the components of the examination on each occasion that he/she presents
for the examination. Components from previous failed examinations will not be considered. The Final
Examination is held annually in October to November (refer to the dates page at the front of this
Handbook). Candidates may complete the Written Examination at regional locations.
The written examination consists of two (2) written papers, each of three (3) hours duration. Each written
paper comprises short answer questions. Evidence-based medicine will be examined, and appropriate
citations of historical and contemporary research will be required
Six (6) medium case scenarios each of approximately 17 minutes duration will be examined and will
include a mix of clinical patients and associated investigations. Concurrent with and following the history
taking and the clinical examination an examiner will be present. Questions will be asked at any stage
during the 17 minutes. Any necessary examination equipment will be supplied to candidates. Candidates
may bring their own personal headlight and light source.
The Surgical Anatomy Viva will consist of any combination of photos, diagrams or specimens for the
assessment of anatomical knowledge. Any area of the body with relevance to Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery may be examined. The Viva will be 15 minutes in duration.
Three (3) OMS viva voce examinations of 20 minutes each will be examined. These vivas involve
PowerPoint images of clinical material. Identical images are used for each candidate with standardised
questions. Surgical Pathology will be incorporated as a component of the OMS Vivas with photographic
presentations of histopathology specimens and case scenarios.
• Have been deemed eligible for the Final Examination in that year
• Attempt all four sections (written, anatomy, medium cases, and OMS vivas) in the same
examination diet
The examination passing standard for each of these examinations is set by the relevant examination
review panel using formal standard setting methods. The ‘passing standard’ is reviewed at each
examination series and may be adjusted with consideration to differences in the difficulty of
examinations and to maintain the standards. The minimum score required to pass may be set by
applying an error adjustment to the ‘passing standard’ score.
As all components of the final examination are blueprinted to curriculum modules and proficiency
domains, minimum passing standards may also be set based on the aggregation of these. Thus,
candidates must also achieve the passing standard across modules and proficiencies.
EXAMINERS
Examiners for the Final Examination are approved by the College and listed on the website prior to the
Examination.
Examiners examine singly or in pairs and are rotated between the candidates. The Chair of the
Examination Panel can also examine. At the completion of the Examination, a Court of Examiners’
meeting is held, chaired by the Registrar - OMS and is attended by the Chair of the Court of Examiners
and all of the Examiners.
Observers
An observer may be present in any of the exam components. Whilst advance notification is preferred,
candidates retain the right to object to an observer being present at the time of the examination. A
candidate may only object to the observer on the basis of a previous relationship. The Chair of the Court
of Examiners or the Registrar – OMS may elect to observe any segment of the Examination, and
candidates cannot object to their presence.
If a dispute arises between a candidate and one or more of his/her Examiners the Chair of the Court of
Examiners will be asked to document and adjudicate. If the Chair is unavailable or unable to resolve the
dispute, it should be dealt with expeditiously by the Registrar. The arbitration of the Registrar will be final
at that time. The parties involved have the right to appeal to the Registrar and may do so in writing
through the College office. This is done through the Complaints Handling and Appeals Processes (refer
to Part F – Section 2; Reconsideration, Review & Appeal).
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
In the event of illness or bereavement, or any other matter warranting special consideration, prior to the
examination:
a. The candidate must notify the Registrar of the difficulty and forward the details of the problem on
the duly completed Application for Special Consideration form available from the College. In the
case of illness, a medical certificate must accompany the form
b. The Registrar will assess each case on its merits with respect to the acuteness or severity of the
event
c. The Registrar will advise the candidate whether to proceed with the examination
d. Where a candidate withdraws from an examination the enrolment fee is not normally refundable.
However, if the candidate satisfies the CEO that exceptional circumstances will preclude
presentation for the examination, a partial refund may be offered.
a. The candidate will inform the Chair of the Court of Examiners that a problem has arisen, and furnish
details using the Application for Special Consideration form. In the case of illness, a medical
certificate must accompany the form
b. The Chair (or nominee) will, if possible, interview the candidate and will then advise the candidate
whether to continue with the examination
c. If the candidate decides to continue with the examination, the details of the request will be
considered by the Court of Examiners after the candidate’s marks have been discussed, but prior
to final determination of a result
d. If a candidate fails to appear for the examination, or if withdrawal from the examination is advised,
a portion of the fee may be refunded to the candidate, at the discretion of the CEO. The evidence
for medical or compassionate grounds should be received by the College within seven (7) days.
NOTIFICATION OF RESULTS
Candidates will be sent formal notification of results from the Registrar (on behalf of the Council), in
writing, within two (2) working days.
In the event of an unsatisfactory result with failure of the examination, the Chair of the Court of
Examiners prepares a detailed account of the candidate’s performance in each segment of the
examination, using information provided by individual Examiners during the components of the
examination, and this is forwarded to the Registrar - OMS (SFS). The Registrar - OMS (SFS) provides
the feedback in the form of a letter and written report to the trainee and their Director of Training.
Trainees are encouraged to discuss the report with the Director of Training. (Refer to Part A section
4.4).
Candidates who do not achieve a pass in the Final Examination do not satisfy the requirements for the
award of Fellowship.
Eligibility to re-present for the Final Examination remains for a period of three (3) years following the
assessment of eligibility. Candidates must be re-assessed for eligibility following expiry of the three (3)
years and will be required to complete the assessment of eligibility form and pay the prescribed fee.
APPROVED POSITION
All candidates re-presenting must hold an approved position at the time of the next diet of the Final
examination. This position should be primarily based in one Training Centre and be held for at least six
(6) months prior to the final examination.
This position must be approved by the BoS in advance of the Final Examination. The approved position
must be supported by the Regional Surgical Committee and the application signed by the Director of
Training. The candidate should submit the information in writing regarding the proposed approved post,
including a timetable for the position, and the FOMS06 application form to the Education Officer – OMS
by the 15th December, of the year of the final examination, for review by the Training Committee before
the Training Committee reports to the Board of Studies meeting. The candidate must demonstrate that
the position contains elements of clinical training and formal education sessions affiliated with a regional
training centre before endorsement can be considered.
All trainees must complete the enrolment process with the College and pay the requisite fees for trainees
occupying an approved position.
The BoS considers a mentor to be essential during this period and a list of potential mentors can be
obtained from the College The candidate re-presenting must also have completed all other training
requirements including accredited training time and assessments and maintain enrolment as an
approved trainee, not occupying an accredited post.
2 E- SECTION 2
When trainees are notified of a pass in the Final Examination in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and have
successfully completed all components of Surgical Training, they are sent copies of the Constitution and
By Laws of the College and invited to complete an Application for Admission as a Fellow of the College
on the prescribed form.
Trainees who wish to have their Application for Admission to Fellowship considered should return the
Admission to Fellowship Form together with the Completion of Research Form, Completion of Training
Form and payment of the prescribed fee by the designated time. An Admission to Fellowship application
shall be submitted to College Board for formal consideration. The College Board may admit an applicant
to Fellowship once the College has received written confirmation from the Director of Training that the
prescribed training time and mandatory research requirements have been successfully completed.
Upon successful completion of training and following formal admission to Fellowship, the new Fellow
will receive a Testamur, together with other College literature and will be entitled to use the post-
nominals FRACDS(OMS).
The College Admission to Fellowship Policy outlines the eligibility requirements for application to
Fellowship in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (FRACDS(OMS)), prescribe the process for admission to
FRACDS(OMS) and to set the time limit for admission post eligibility requirements being met.
Applicants who are approved for Fellowship but who have not applied for the FRACDS(OMS) have an
18-month time limit for application to FRACDS(OMS).
CREDENTIALING OF FELLOWS
Credentialing in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) is the establishment of the range of activities that
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons can undertake in the core areas of the discipline, where specialist
knowledge and skills is required.
From Zusman, J. (1998). Credentialing and Privileging Systems (2nd Ed). APCE: Florida
Micro-accreditation, is credentialing of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in specific areas of surgery that
fall within the currently recognised scope of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery but for which individuals need
to demonstrate that specific and advanced training, education and assessment has been undertaken.
Information regarding credentialing in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and Head & Neck Surgery can be
obtained from the College. Credentialing is for 6-year periods and then renewal is required.
Please find the requirements for Microcredentialling in Craniofacial and Head & Neck surgery via this
link.
1 F - SECTION 1
What is Mentoring?
Mentoring is a relationship that gives individuals the opportunity to share professional and personal
skills and develop in the process. It is based on encouragement, constructive comments, mutual
respect and a will to learn and share so that successes and failures can be evaluated.
It is recommended that Trainees have a Mentor(s) for the duration of their OMS training program. The
minimum commitment to the Mentor Scheme by either party is one year.
The Board of Studies has compiled a list of OMS Fellows who are approved to become Mentors for
Trainees. You can request this list from the OMS Education Officer. It is the trainee's responsibility to
approach a possible Mentor and initiate the first meeting.
Discussions are confidential. Both Mentor and Trainee need to have a clear and shared understanding
of the scheme and its roles and participants. Mentors and Trainees of the OMS Mentoring Scheme will
therefore be required to sign a Mentoring Agreement.
Mentors
Where possible, Mentors selected for the scheme will be Fellows of the College. Where practical,
approved Mentors will not be the Director of Training or Supervisor of Training responsible for the
trainee’s assessment. The Mentor should have had a minimum of three (3) years specialist OMS
experience.
Trainee responsibilities:
• Be open to feedback
• Set realistic expectations with the Mentor
• Be honest about needs and deficiencies
• Follow through on commitments and seek help when necessary
• Discuss failures as well as successes
At the introductory meeting both parties are required to complete the Mentoring Agreement. This
agreement is to be signed by the Mentor and trainee. Each party should retain a copy and a copy
should be forwarded to the College office within 14 days of completion.
2 F - SECTION 2
POLICIES
The College policy relating to Reconsideration, Review and Appeal was reviewed and came into effect
on 1 July 2018.
The purpose of this policy is to outline College decisions which may be formally appealed and the
processes which must be followed to activate a formal appeal. It is intended that these processes enable
resolution between the College and those who have been subject to a decision which they consider
unsatisfactory.
2.1.2 PLAGIARISM
The College policy relating to Plagiarism was reviewed and came into effect on 1 July 2018.
The College conducts assessments and examinations at Membership and Fellowship level in General
and Specialist Dental Practice and the training program in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The College at
all times strives to maintain fair, valid and consistent assessment and examination processes. The core
expectation of the College underpinning all candidate work is that of academic integrity and honesty.
The College policy relating to Trainees Requiring Assistance Policy was introduced in 2015.
This Policy is designed to assist in the identification, support and management of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery (OMS) Trainees Requiring Assistance (TRA). This policy is designed to assist Directors of
Training (DoTs) and Supervisors of Training (SoTs) who are dealing with TRA, to identify TRA early and
to implement effective support systems for them. This policy applies to OMS trainees registered in
accredited OMS training posts within Training Centres accredited by the College.
The College policy relating to Bullying, Harassment and Discrimination was introduced in 2016.
This policy relates to the conduct of all members of the College community. The College is committed to
ensuring fair and equitable workplace practices and has a zero tolerance of all forms of harassment. The
College workplace includes training, examination, meeting and education sites in public and private
settings, electronic communications regarding members of the College community, and within the
College offices.
The College policy relating to Admission to Fellowship Policy came into effect in February 2018.
The policy is to confirm the eligibility requirements for the application for the FRACDS(OMS), prescribe
the process for admission to Fellowship and to set the time limit for admission post eligibility requirements
being met.
The College policy relating to Overseas Trained Specialist Assessment (OTOMS) Policy was reviewed
and came into effect in November 2018.
The purpose of this policy is to define the assessment of Specialist International Medical Graduates
(SIMG) referred to as Overseas Trained Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon (OTOMS) seeking the right to
practice in Australia according to the directions of the Board of Studies, OMS, the Medical Board of
Australia and the Dental board of Australia. This policy defines the specialist assessment process, which
aims to determine whether an OTOMS primary and specialist qualifications, specialist training, and
consultant experience are comparable to those of an Australian or New Zealand-trained oral and
maxillofacial surgeon.
The purpose of this policy is to provide a process to address and resolve matters or complaints against
any member of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons (College) made by other members,
colleagues or other sources where the complaint relates to; the professional or ethical standard of
conduct of a member, the conduct of a member which affects the honour, good reputation, interests, or
work of the College or the College Code of Conduct.
The College OMS Final Examination Format and Marking Policy was reviewed and came into effect in
October 2018.
The purpose of this policy is to prescribe the process followed by the Royal Australasian College of Dental
Surgeons in setting and marking the Oral Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) Final Examination.
The College OMS Surgical Science and Training (SST) Format and Marking Policy was reviewed and
came into effect in October 2018.
The purpose of this policy is to prescribe the process followed by the Royal Australasian College of Dental
Surgeons (RACDS) in setting and marking the Oral Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) Surgical Science and
Training (SST) Examination.
The College Refund Policy was reviewed and came into effect in July 2018.
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance on the issuing of refunds for College subscriptions and
enrolment in courses and examinations.
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance regarding the circumstances under which special
consideration may be given in relation to assessments and examinations, as well the process for
application for special consideration.
A Learning Portfolio is far more than a curriculum vitae. It is a tailor-made document which states the
trainee’s experience and objectives in an orderly fashion and in the context of the requirements of the
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) Training Program of the Royal Australasian College of Dental
Surgeons (the College). The Portfolio need not be a bound volume but a neatly set out ring bound folder.
Separate sections are separated by page dividers. The Training Portfolio is reviewed by the Director of
Training as part of the completion of training requirements to ensure that the portfolio has been
satisfactory maintained
It should be used as a record of the trainee’s learning and achievements while undertaking the education
and training program in OMS and should include the following information:
• Personal details
• Summary of previous posts and learning
• Career intentions
• Courses attended
• Copies of all appraisal forms (confidential) – originals to be sent to the College
- AOP forms of various operative procedures
- TAC forms
- Case Presentation and Discussion forms
- Any formative assessments (Six-Monthly and yearly assessments)
- Logbook set out in prescribed form as outlined in the Handbook
• Research experience
• Publications, published abstracts and presentations
• Case presentations
• Audit projects undertaken and planned
• Teaching notes and critique
• Reading lists
• Memorable events and patients
• Updated and serialised CV
• Anything else considered relevant
The curriculum document MAPS (modules) include certain requirements which need to be checked off
and these are the learning portfolio check lists in each of the modules. These need to be marked off as
the modules are completed. It is the trainee’s responsibility to make sure that these are completed.
Trainees will also be assessed by completing formative assessments through the program. Any
deficiencies can then be remedied in a timely fashion and in such a way so as to reduce any lengthening
of the program or scrambling to complete requirements at the end.
Experience is the raw material for the Portfolio and therefore a record of all that has been learned
through the program should be kept and documented. This will also assist in feeding back any
constructive criticisms in order to improve the program.
The Portfolio should be reflective, as there is a need to be reflective in one’s practice. It should show
examples that demonstrate what has been learnt and indicate improved practice; this should also be
evident in the formative assessments throughout the program and the structured interviews with various
supervisors. A Portfolio which shows that everything is perfect might arouse suspicion and so trainees
should indicate that they have responded to problems which have arisen and describe how effectively
they have been dealt with. A good Portfolio shows a balance between reflection and evidence. Much of
this information will be personal and as such not all of the Portfolio will need to be assessed by the
Training Committee of the College, although anything considered to be relevant should be included.
It is worthwhile continuing this as a lifelong process as continuing medical, dental and surgical education
is an important process in which all professionals have to achieve. A contemporaneous and complete
Portfolio will help in this direction.
The Portfolio will be reviewed by the Director of Training as part of the requirements for the completion
of training for the award of the Fellowship.
• Patient care
- Checklists and other documentation
• Medical Knowledge
- Self-assessment modules or review questions completed
- Tutorials, seminars, etc. attended
- Essays completed
• Professionalism
- Any community service projects
- Medical organisation and membership activities
Clinical Assessment
Investigation(s)
Differential Diagnosis
Treatment
Please mark this if you have not observed the behaviour and therefore feel unable to comment.
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions N/D/C
Comments
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications including
alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers and
checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities (and
relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Ensures appropriate drugs, inc. local anaesthesia are administered where
appropriate
Deploys specialist supporting equipment (e.g. operating microscope) effectively
Exposure and closure
Demonstrates knowledge of optimum skin incision/mucosal/portal/access
Achieves an adequate exposure through purposeful dissection in correct tissue
planes and identifies all structures correctly
Completes a sound wound repair where appropriate
Protects the wounds with dressings, splints and drains where appropriate
Intra operative technique
Follows an agreed logical sequence or protocol for the procedure
Consistently handles tissue well with minimal damage
Controls bleeding promptly by appropriate method
Demonstrates a sound technique of knots and sutures/staples
Uses instruments appropriately and safely
Proceeds at appropriate pace with economy of movement
Anticipates and responds appropriately to variation e.g. anatomy
Deals calmly and effectively with unexpected events/complications
Uses assistant(s) to the best advantage at all times
Communicates clearly and consistently with the scrub team
Communicates clearly with the anaesthetist
Appropriate design of flap
Incision to correct length/depth/orientation
Smooth reflection of flap in correct plane
Gentle handling of tissue when reflecting flap
Correct application of buccal retractor
Correct protection of lingual nerve as necessary
Bone removal: bur – correct handling of handpiece with pengrip and pencil
support
Correct bone removal (site and amount)
Tooth division: correct angulation or judged unnecessary
Appropriate choice of elevator
Correct application of elevator
Tooth elevated correctly
Bone left with no rough edges
Socket debrided
Ensures correct apposition of flap
Post-operative management
Ensures the patient is transferred safely from the operating table to bed
Constructs a clear operation note
Records clear and appropriate post-operative instructions
Deals with specimens. Labels and orientates specimens appropriately
Level at which completed elements of the AOP were performed on this occasion Tick as appropriate
Level 0 Insufficient evidence observed to support a summary judgment ☐
Level 1 Unable to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 2 Able to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 3 Able to perform the procedure with minimum supervision (needed occasional
☐
help)
Level 4 Competent to perform the procedure unsupervised (could deal with
☐
complications that arose)
Comments by Trainee:
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications
including alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers
and checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities
(and relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Post-operative management
Ensures the patient is transferred safely from the operating table to bed
Constructs a clear operation note
Records clear and appropriate post-operative instructions
Deals with specimens. Labels and orientates specimens appropriately
Level at which completed elements of the AOP were performed on this occasion Tick as appropriate
Level 0 Insufficient evidence observed to support a summary judgment ☐
Level 1 Unable to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 2 Able to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 3 Able to perform the procedure with minimum supervision (needed occasional
☐
help)
Level 4 Competent to perform the procedure unsupervised (could deal with
☐
complications that arose)
Comments by Trainee:
Trainee Name
Clinical Problem
Demonstrates appropriate soft tissue flap use and tissue handling for
closure
Adjustment of any overlying prosthesis e.g. denture
Prepares for extubation
Post-operative management
Ensures the patient is transferred safely from the operating table to bed
Constructs a clear operation note
Records clear and appropriate post-operative instructions
Deals with specimens. Labels and orientates specimens appropriately
Level at which completed elements of the AOP were performed on this occasion Tick as appropriate
Level 0 Insufficient evidence observed to support a summary judgment ☐
Level 1 Unable to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 2 Able to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 3 Able to perform the procedure with minimum supervision (needed occasional
☐
help)
Level 4 Competent to perform the procedure unsupervised (could deal with
☐
complications that arose)
Comments by Trainee:
Clinical Problem
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications including
alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers and
checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities (and
relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative strategies/techniques
to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Ensures appropriate drugs, inc. local anaesthesia are administered where
appropriate
Comments by Trainee:
Clinical Problem
Comments by Trainee:
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications including
alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers and
checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities (and
relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative strategies/techniques
to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table (with
shoulder rolls and neck extension)
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Ensures appropriate drugs, inc. local anaesthesia are administered where
appropriate
Level at which completed elements of the AOP were performed on this occasion Tick as appropriate
Level 0 Insufficient evidence observed to support a summary judgment ☐
Level 1 Unable to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 2 Able to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 3 Able to perform the procedure with minimum supervision (needed occasional
☐
help)
Level 4 Competent to perform the procedure unsupervised (could deal with
☐
complications that arose)
Comments by Trainee:
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications including
alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers and
checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities (and
relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications including
alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers
and checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities (and
relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications
including alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers
and checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities
(and relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Level at which completed elements of the AOP were performed on this occasion Tick as appropriate
Level 0 Insufficient evidence observed to support a summary judgment ☐
Level 1 Unable to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 2 Able to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 3 Able to perform the procedure with minimum supervision (needed occasional
☐
help)
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications including
alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers and
checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities (and
relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Level at which completed elements of the AOP were performed on this occasion Tick as appropriate
Level 0 Insufficient evidence observed to support a summary judgment ☐
Level 1 Unable to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 2 Able to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 3 Able to perform the procedure with minimum supervision (needed occasional
☐
help)
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications including
alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers and
checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities (and
relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Comments by Trainee:
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications
including alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers
and checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities
(and relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Level at which completed elements of the AOP were performed on this occasion Tick as appropriate
Level 0 Insufficient evidence observed to support a summary judgment ☐
Level 1 Unable to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 2 Able to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 3 Able to perform the procedure with minimum supervision (needed occasional
☐
help)
Level 4 Competent to perform the procedure unsupervised (could deal with
☐
complications that arose)
Comments by Trainee:
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications
including alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers
and checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities
(and relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Clinical Problem
Comments by Trainee:
Clinical Problem
Clinical Problem
Clinical Problem
Rating
Competencies and Definitions Comments
N/D/C
Consent
Demonstrates sound knowledge of indications and contraindications including
alternatives to surgery
Demonstrates awareness of sequelae of operative or non-operative
management
Demonstrates sound knowledge of complications of surgery
Explains the perioperative process to the patient and/or relatives or carers and
checks understanding
Explains likely outcome and time to recovery and checks understanding
Pre-operative planning
Demonstrates recognition of anatomical and pathological abnormalities (and
relevant co-morbidities) and selects appropriate operative
strategies/techniques to deal with these e.g. nutritional status
Demonstrates ability to make reasoned choice of appropriate equipment,
materials or devices (if any) taking into account appropriate investigations
Checks materials, equipment and device requirements with operating room
staff
Ensures the operation site is marked where applicable
Checks patient records, personally reviews investigations
Pre-operative preparation
Checks in theatre that consent has been obtained and appropriate time out
procedures
Gives effective briefing to theatre team
Ensures proper and safe positioning of the patient on the operating table
Demonstrates careful skin or mucosal preparation – as required
Demonstrates careful draping of the patient’s operative field
Ensures general equipment and materials are deployed safely (e.g. suction,
diathermy)
Level at which completed elements of the AOP were performed on this occasion Tick as appropriate
Level 0 Insufficient evidence observed to support a summary judgment ☐
Level 1 Unable to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 2 Able to perform the procedure, or part observed, under supervision ☐
Level 3 Able to perform the procedure with minimum supervision (needed occasional
☐
help)
Level 4 Competent to perform the procedure unsupervised (could deal with
☐
complications that arose)
Comments by Trainee:
The Team Appraisal of Conduct (TAC) form is a peer assessment tool comprising a self-
assessment by the trainee and the collated ratings from a range of colleagues who work with
the trainee. As a part of a multidisciplinary team, surgical trainees work with other people who
have complementary skills. They are expected to understand the range of roles and expertise
of team members in order to work effectively within that team. The TAC is used as an
educational method of assessing competence in professional skills within a team-working
environment.
The assessment provides developmental feedback to the trainee in order to improve the
trainee’s clinical care and professional competence by directing learning and improving insight.
Trainees are assessed doing what is normally expected of them in their usual working
environment. The trainee selects different raters to cover a variety of perspectives.
The TAC assessment is confidential. Individual assessments are anonymised and are not
disclosed to the trainee. Feedback to the trainee is delivered through a report which is sent to
the trainee and the Director of Training and comprises the rater’s aggregate ratings compared
with the trainee’s self-assessment, plus rater’s comments which are listed verbatim.
The process is commenced by the trainee completing the self-assessment TAC survey through
Informz which is collated at the College. Concurrently, the trainee selects a minimum of 8 raters
(maximum of 12). Raters should be members of the trainee’s multidisciplinary healthcare team
who represent a range of different grades and environments (e.g. ward, theatre, outpatients)
and who have sufficient expertise to be able to make an objective judgment about the trainee’s
performance. Raters should not include administrators, support staff or patients.
The trainee is to send the Education Officer the list of names and email addresses of who will
be rating the trainee. The Education Officer will then email a link of the survey to the raters
with an explanation of the TAC. The assessment form should only take 10-15 minutes to
complete. The data is then collected and the results and feedback will then be sent out to the
trainee and Director of Training in a report.
For raters: Indicate the environment in which you have primarily observed the trainee, your
position, and add any comments on particular strengths noted. If you have rated a particular
attitude or behaviour as borderline or below expectation, please describe your concerns or
areas that require development.
Thank you for your time to complete this survey and for contributing to training of OMS
trainees, specifically in the improvement of professional skills.
Supervisor of
Training
Please consider the trainee’s performance in general terms and against the criteria (initial here)
provided. Initial the box on the right to confirm you have consulted with colleagues,
junior medical staff and allied health personnel prior to completing this report.
Key:
1 Unsatisfactory – performs significantly below that generally observed for this level of experience
2 Below expectation – requires further development
3 Meets expectation – performs at a satisfactory level
4 Above expectation – performs at a level better than that which would be expected for the level of
experience
5 Exceptional – performs at a level beyond that which would be expected for the level of experience
N/O Not observed
CLINICAL KNOWLEDGE 1 2 3 4 5 N/O
1 Clinical knowledge of subject (Perspective to patient care,
appropriate investigations, post-operative care)
2 Professional knowledge (Knowledge of hospital procedures, policy,
medico legal aspects)
3 Clinical clerking (Adequacy of detail in written records, legibility,
accurate drug charting)
4 History taking (Ability to take history and perform physical
examination, obtains pertinent information, perceptive, thorough)
PROCEDURAL SKILLS 1 2 3 4 5 N/O
5 Anatomical knowledge (demonstrates adequate knowledge of
anatomy during planning & procedures)
6 Surgical technique (demonstrates good surgical technique, tissue &
instrument handling, suturing & wound care)
7 Adaptive skills (adapts techniques to the requirements of the
situation)
8 Surgical judgment (demonstrates adequate surgical judgment during
procedures)
9 Surgical development (analyses own technique & demonstrates
quality improvement)
10 Ergonomics (demonstrates efficiency with maintenance of technique
and standards)
11 Assistance (seeks assistance appropriately and timely)
12 Operative complications (satisfactory response, in control – if not
observed N/O)
CLINICAL JUDGEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 N/O
AS THE SUPERVISOR OF TRAINING I HAVE DETERMINED THE OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF THE TRAINEE IN
THIS SIX MONTHS HAS BEEN:
Satisfactory
Borderline
Unsatisfactory
Supervisor
Director of Training
Chair, RSC
Director of Training: I have advised the trainee that improvement will be expected over the next 3 to 6 month
rotation period in the areas specified above or another borderline or unsatisfactory six-month report may result.
Name ____________________________________________________________
Trainee: I have had the implications of this warning explained to me and I understand them.
Other Names
Training Year
Regional Training (e.g. OMS 1, 2, 3 or 4)
Centre
Surgeon
1. Dentoalveolar
Assistant
Surgeon
2. Oral and Facial Infection
Assistant
Surgeon
3. Facial Trauma
Assistant
Surgeon
4. Pathology - benign
Assistant
Surgeon
5. Pathology - malignant
Assistant
Surgeon
6. Preprosthetic - minor
Assistant
Surgeon
7. Preprosthetic - major
Assistant
Surgeon
8. Preprosthetic - implants
Assistant
Surgeon
9. Orthognathic – single jaw +/- genioplasty or SAME
Assistant
Surgeon
10. Orthognathic – bimaxillary +/- genioplasty
Assistant
Surgeon
11. Orthognathic - other
Assistant
Surgeon
12. Temporomandibular Joint
Assistant
Surgeon
13. Maxillary Sinus
Assistant
Surgeon
14. Reconstructive – hard tissue
Assistant
Surgeon
15. Reconstructive – soft tissue
Assistant
Surgeon
16. Reconstructive – composite
Assistant
Surgeon
17. Reconstructive – graft harvest
Assistant
18. Other procedures: Surgeon
Assistant
To be listed as surgeon the trainee must have done a substantial portion of the procedure and be the one in “charge” of
the procedure. The consultant may be present and act as a mentor. If registrars do a side of an operation each, both
cannot claim to be surgeon. The more senior or the one in-charge claims to be surgeon. The other may list as first
assistant. There can only be two surgeons if there are two different procedures at distant sites i.e. harvest of bone graft
and a mandibular reconstruction. A bimaxillary osteotomy is a single operation.
A person who does not scrub in or is not the first assistant on the case cannot claim to be an assistant.
I certify that this is a true and accurate summary of my training and understand that my complete logbook may be
audited for accuracy.
First Name
Other Names
Assistant
Other procedures:
To be listed as surgeon the trainee must have done a substantial portion of the procedure and be the one in
“charge” of the procedure. The consultant may be present and act as a mentor. If registrars do a side of an
operation each, both cannot claim to be surgeon. The more senior or the one in-charge claims to be surgeon. The
other may list as first assistant. There can only be two surgeons if there are two different procedures at distant
sites i.e. harvest of bone graft and a mandibular reconstruction. A bimaxillary osteotomy is a single operation.
A person who does not scrub in or is not the first assistant on the case cannot claim to be an assistant.
I certify that this is a true and accurate summary of my training and understand that my complete logbook
may be audited for accuracy.
First Name
Other Names
Regional Training
Conclusion of Training (eg. OMS 4)
Centre
DATES (eg. 1 Jan 2011 CUMULATIVE
PROCEDURAL AREAS
– 31 Dec 2011) TOTAL
Surgeon
1. Dentoalveolar
Assistant
Surgeon
2. Oral and Facial Infection
Assistant
Surgeon
3. Facial Trauma
Assistant
Surgeon
4. Pathology - benign
Assistant
Surgeon
5. Pathology - malignant
Assistant
Surgeon
6. Preprosthetic - minor
Assistant
Surgeon
7. Preprosthetic - major
Assistant
Surgeon
8. Preprosthetic - implants
Assistant
Surgeon
9. Orthognathic – single jaw +/- genioplasty or SAME
Assistant
Surgeon
10. Orthognathic – bimaxillary +/- genioplasty
Assistant
Surgeon
11. Orthognathic - other
Assistant
Surgeon
12. Temporomandibular Joint
Assistant
Surgeon
13. Maxillary Sinus
Assistant
Surgeon
14. Reconstructive – hard tissue
Assistant
Surgeon
15. Reconstructive – soft tissue
Assistant
Surgeon
16. Reconstructive – composite
Assistant
Surgeon
17. Reconstructive – graft harvest
Assistant
Surgeon
18. Other procedures:
Assistant
To be listed as surgeon the trainee must have done a substantial portion of the procedure and be the one in “charge” of the
procedure. The consultant may be present and act as a mentor. If registrars do a side of an operation each, both cannot
claim to be surgeon, the more senior or the one in-charge claims to be surgeon, the other may list as first assistant. There
can only be two surgeons if there are two different procedures at distant sites ie. harvest of bone graft and a mandibular
reconstruction. A bimaxillary osteotomy is a single operation.
A person who does not scrub in or is not the first assistant on the case cannot claim to be an assistant.
I certify that this is a true and accurate summary of my training and understand that my complete logbook may
be audited for accuracy.
First Name
Other Names
Regional Training
Conclusion of Training (eg. OMS 4)
Centre
DATES (eg. 1 Jan 2011 CUMULATIVE
PROCEDURAL AREAS
– 31 Dec 2011) TOTAL
Surgeon
1. Dentoalveolar
Assistant
Surgeon
2. Oral and Facial Infection
Assistant
Surgeon
3. Facial Trauma
Assistant
Surgeon
4. Pathology - benign
Assistant
Surgeon
5. Pathology - malignant
Assistant
Surgeon
6. Preprosthetic & adjunctive implant procedures
Assistant
Surgeon
7. Implantology (cases)
Assistant
Implant fixtures (number)
8. Orthognathic – single jaw +/- genioplasty or Surgeon
SAME Assistant
Surgeon
9. Orthognathic – bimaxillary +/- genioplasty
Assistant
Surgeon
10. Orthognathic – other
Assistant
Surgeon
11. Temporomandibular Joint
Assistant
Surgeon
12. Maxillary Sinus
Assistant
Surgeon
13. Reconstructive – hard tissue
Assistant
Surgeon
14. Reconstructive – soft tissue & composite
Assistant
Surgeon
15. Reconstructive – graft harvest
Assistant
Surgeon
16. Other procedures
Assistant
Other procedures:
To be listed as surgeon the trainee must have done a substantial portion of the procedure and be the one in
“charge” of the procedure. The consultant may be present and act as a mentor. If registrars do a side of an
operation each, both cannot claim to be surgeon, the more senior or the one in-charge claims to be surgeon, the
other may list as first assistant. There can only be two surgeons if there are two different procedures at distant
sites ie. harvest of bone graft and a mandibular reconstruction. A bimaxillary osteotomy is a single operation.
A person who does not scrub in or is not the first assistant on the case cannot claim to be an assistant.
I certify that this is a true and accurate summary of my training and understand that my complete
logbook may be audited for accuracy.
APPENDIX 25- STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR OMS (SCOMS) – ACCREDITATION OF REGIONAL TRAINING CENTRES,
HOSPITALS AND POSTS
1.1
1.3
Summary data of leave
taken Evidence to support
leave is provided
Supervised consultant Documentation on Trainees attend a minimum Mandatory PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
outpatient clinics in frequency of consultative of one consultative clinic
consultative practice clinics per week
Caseload and Casemix Summary statistics of Regular elective and acute Mandatory
number and casemix of admissions.
surgical cases managed by
OMS in the previous year
No conflicting work
requirements
Imaging – diagnostic and Documentation on Accredited by appropriate Mandatory PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
3.2 intervention services accreditation body
Feedback from surgeons Basic general imaging Desirable PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
and trainees Specific head and neck
imaging
Theatre equipment Documentation on OMS This will vary depending on Desirable PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
equipment available size and casemix of the Inventory of specific OMS equipment
3.4 Feedback from Supervisor unit
of Training
Computer facilities with Computer facilities with Computers available with Mandatory
IT support internet access free internet access
4.2
24 hour computer access
acknowledging security
issues
Tutorial room available Documented booking and Tutorial rooms available Mandatory
access processes when required
4.3
Feedback from supervisor
and trainees
24 hr access Desirable
acknowledging security
issues
4.5
Feedback from trainees Weekly Grand Rounds
Opportunities for trainees
to present cases
Simulated learning Documentation on local Simple basic skills training Desirable
environment opportunities for self- equipment available
4.6 directed skills acquisition
and practice
Standard 5 – Supervision
Effective supervision must be provided to support trainees in acquiring the necessary education, skills and experience.
Criteria Assessed by: Minimum In Hospital or Standard MET, UNMET or MET WITH
Within EXCEPTION Provide written comments for those
Network? standards not fully met.
DoT - Director of FRACDS(OMS) or Mandatory
Training equivalent.
(per Network/Training
Centre) Consultant involved in OMS
5.1
training
5.4
College representative
included on interview panel
for the appointment of new
staff
Hospital response to Mechanisms for dealing Resolution of validated Desirable PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
feedback conveyed by with feedback problems
7.6 the College on behalf of
trainees
Risk management Documentation on Quality Assurance Board or Mandatory PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
processes with patient processes including those equivalent reporting to
safety and quality for correct site surgery appropriate governance
committee reporting to body
8.2 Quality Assurance Board
Documentation published
by HR, clinical risk
management and other
safety policies
Head of OMS Documentation on structure Head of OMS is a Mandatory PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
Department and of surgical department recognised position in the
governance role hospital surgical committee
8.3
Position description and
reporting lines of OMS
service
Records of Surgical If criteria 8.3, the HoD, is Mandatory
Department meetings not an FRACDS(OMS) or
equivalent, an OMS
Consultant be in
attendance by invitation at
surgical committee
meetings
Hospital credentialing or Documentation on Clinicians credentialed Mandatory PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
privileging committee credentialing or privileging every 5 years
8.4 committee and its activities
Surgical audit and peer Documentation on audit 6 Monthly audit review of Mandatory PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
review program and peer review program morbidity/mortality
for unit
All surgical staff participate
8.5
Opportunity for trainees to
participate
Hospital systems Documentation on systems Surgeons and trainees Mandatory PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
reviews reviews participate in review of
8.6
patient/system adverse
events
Occupational safety Evidence of education on Provision of education on Mandatory PROVIDED PRIOR TO VISIT
protection against ionising protection
radiation and/or Laser to
patients and staff
Radiation protective
equipment available
NB – Applications for accreditation for an additional or a new post refer to unaccredited registrars.
Applications for accreditation of existing posts refer to accredited OMS trainees.
Post Title
Training Centre
Date of Visit
Director of Training
Supervisor of Training
Head of Department/Unit
Chief of Surgery
Name Public FTE # Lists /month # Clinics /week
Consultant Trainers
Supporting
attachment
Standard Documentation Requested Comments / Response reference
if applicable
Please attach a copy of the
trainee’s/registrar’s weekly timetable.
Timetable
In units with more than one
trainee/registrar – please attach
individual trainee/registrar timetables.
Please indicate the frequency and
nature of co-ordinated learning
Co-ordinated Learning experiences
experiences
E.g. Audits, journal clubs, tutorials.
Presentation of individual portfolios
assessed by verification of College
Clinical Training records of AOP completion
Assessment
Have portfolio available for checking
during visit.
Access to external
Evidence of study leave policy for
educational activities for
training institution
trainees/registrars
Opportunities for research Please attach the five most recent
publications from the training unit
Supporting
attachment
Standard Documentation Requested Comments / Response reference
if applicable
Documentation showing
Involvement in the frequency of involvement in
acute/emergency care of acute/emergency care of surgical
surgical patients patients
Provision of on call roster
Summary statistics of number and casemix of surgical cases managed by OMS in the previous year
# Cases last 12
Scope of practice Full or limited scope? Shared with other service?
months
Dentoalveolar
Facial Trauma
Pathology
(begin & malignant)
Preprosthetic & adjunctive
implant procedures
Implants
Orthognathic – bimaxillary
Orthognathic – other
TMJ
Maxillary sinus
Trauma
Other procedures
Supporting
attachment
Standard Documentation Requested Comments / Response reference
if applicable
Indicate
Format of clinical record
Fully digital / Paper-based /
keeping
Combination
Supporting
attachment
Standard Documentation Requested Comments / Response reference
if applicable
Supporting
attachment
Standard Documentation Requested Comments / Response reference
if applicable
Supporting
attachment
Standard Documentation Requested Comments / Response reference
if applicable
Hospital documentation on
Supervisor’s Role and supervisor’s role in keeping with
Responsibilities College requirements HR Policy
on educational leave
Support services for SoT Admin services available for
role Supervisor’s role
Weekly scheduled educational
Commitment to OMS activities
training program
Feedback from trainees
Support for relationships
with educational programs Feedback from trainees
in related disciplines
Documentation on weekly
Hospital support for service and educational
surgeons involved in activities of staff HR policy on
training educational leave.
Feedback from surgeons
Hospital response to
Documentation / policy outlining
feedback conveyed by the
mechanisms for dealing with
College on behalf of
feedback
trainees
Supporting
attachment
Standard Documentation Requested Comments / Response reference
if applicable
Evidence of hospital
Hospital accreditation accreditation, minimum
status requirement accredited by
ACHS or NZCHS
Documentation on processes
including those for correct site
Risk management surgery Quality Assurance
processes with patient Board or equivalent reporting to
safety and quality appropriate governance body.
committee reporting to
Quality Assurance Board e.g. Documentation published
by HR, clinical risk management
and other safety policies
Documentation on structure of
Head of OMS Department surgical department- Head of
and governance role OMS is a recognised position in
the hospital surgical committee
Documentation on credentialing
Hospital credentialing or
or privileging committee and its
privileging committee
activities
• the development of a time limited association between the Mentor who is qualified and willing to
impart knowledge and experience, and the Trainee who is seeking knowledge, experience and
guidance
• acquisition by the Trainee, through his/her training program and this mentoring process, of the
competence and confidence necessary for advancement to Fellowship.
We are voluntarily entering into a mentoring relationship that we expect to benefit both of us. Our
signatures at the bottom of this agreement signify our mutual acceptance of the following terms of
participation in the Scheme.
1. The duration of the formal mentoring relationship between participants in the program is for a
minimum of 12 months (one (1) academic year).
The duration of the mentoring program will be _______ months, commencing on ____________.
We each agree to actively participate in the Mentoring Scheme for this period.
1. We each agree to be available, responsive to each other’s needs and willing to adjust schedules
if necessary in order to achieve the minimum number of contact hours described below.
2. We agree to have a minimum of ____ meetings, of 1 hour duration, over a one year period.
A minimum of two face-to-face meetings (one meeting each 6 months) is recommended.
4. We agree that information shared between us within the context of the formal mentoring
relationship is confidential and will not be shared outside the relationship without the express
permission of the other participant.
We agree to a no-fault conclusion of this relationship if, for any reason, it seems appropriate.
6. We acknowledge:
• a Mentor’s role is limited to the furnishing of opinions, guidance and suggestions.
• Trainees should take all information given by a Mentor under advisement in making
personal, professional and career decisions.
8. We agree to accept individual responsibility for any cost we personally incur as part of the
formal relationship, including, but not limited to: postage, telephone calls.
9. We agree that during our discussions we will each comply with current privacy legislation and,
in particular, we will not disclose identifiable patient details or information.
We acknowledge that:
• Mentors are volunteers and not paid consultants.
• Neither Mentors nor the RACDS is responsible for career, personal or other decisions made by the
Trainee as a result of the mentoring relationship.
• Mentors only give guidance and/or information from their experience, perspective etc. Mentors do
not make decisions for Trainees.
• The Mentor and the RACDS do not accept any responsibility for decisions made by Trainees.
1. Please comment on the Trainee’s personal, clinical and academic strengths, noting any areas that
would benefit from development (please include scope of clinical experience):
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
4. What are the main benefits you have noted to date from the mentoring relationship?
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
To be forwarded to:
Or by post:
Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons
Level 13, 37 York Street
Sydney NSW 2000
We have completed the progress report for the period _______________ to _____________.
(Date) (Date)
OR
We intend to extend our mentoring relationship and it will now conclude on _________________.
(Date)
1. Purpose
These guidelines are for former trainees who have voluntarily withdrawn or have ceased training due
to failure of the SST exam or other reasons and are seeking to reapply to recommence accredited
training in OMS. These guidelines have been developed in accordance with the accreditation
requirements of the Australian Medical Council, the Australian Dental Council, the Medical Council of
New Zealand and the Dental Council of New Zealand.
Practitioners wishing to make an application for re-entry into the RACDS Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery Training Program must have:
• Formerly been in in a recognised Training Centre and,
• Under the following criteria (A and B), are regarded to be in good standing.
A former trainee is regarded as being in good standing, if at the time of withdrawal, they did not have a
borderline or unsatisfactory Six-Monthly Formative Assessment report or had not committed an act
that could result in an investigation for unprofessional conduct, professional misconduct or notifiable
conduct.
A. Permission to reapply to the Training Centre will be automatically granted to the following
former trainees in good standing (however may be subject to conditions):
a. trainees have voluntarily withdrawn in good standing from a Training Centre
b. trainees who have been dismissed from the College for failure to pay the annual
registration fee or any other outstanding monies
c. trainees who have failed to complete the SST examination
B. Former trainees who ceased training due to the following may be granted permission to apply
to the training programme:
a. dismissed for failure to satisfy dental or medical registration. (At the time of
reapplication, the doctor must have medical & dental registration with no restrictions)
b. ceased for failure to complete the SST examination within 2-years of completing OMS
1
A former trainee who has been dismissed from the OMS training programme and/or an employing
institution due to the following reasons will not be granted permission to reapply for OMS training:
f. failure to complete the SST exam after 3 diets of the examination
g. unsatisfactory performance or formative report
h. failure to satisfy hospital employment requirements
i. unprofessional conduct, professional misconduct or notifiable conduct as defined
by the registering bodies for medicine and dentistry in Australia and New
Zealand
4. Application process
Former trainees seeking permission to reapply should do so in writing to the Assistant Registrar (Oral
& Maxillofacial Surgery) Special Stream by closing date stated in the Handbook (1st April), to be
considered for selection for commencement of training for the next year.
5. Consideration of applications
In considering applications to rejoin the training program after a period of absence, all OMS Fellows
engaged on the Board of Studies or the annual trainee selection process will declare any competing
interests they may have in relation to the applicant/s. These competing interests may not preclude the
member from providing relevant information to the process, however they will be excused from final
decision making.
The information submitted by the former trainee will be discussed with the Chair of the Board of
Studies (OMS). The Chair, on behalf of, or in conjunction with, the Board will determine whether the
trainee may apply to a Training Centre to recommence training on the Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Training Program.
The Chair of the Board may seek additional information from the previous Training Centre and may
consult with other OMS Fellows.
The Chair of the Board will make a recommendation to the Assistant Registrar (Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery) Special Stream and the Registrar will communicate the decision to the former trainee.
If permission is granted to reapply for training in OMS the applicant will be informed of any conditions
attached to this such as (including but not limited to):
a. payment of registration fees or any outstanding monies (if dismissed for non-payment
of fees)
b. successful completion of the SST examination, prior to commencing OMS2
For former trainees who satisfy eligibility criteria 2A and are automatically granted permission to
reapply, with good standing, the applicant should contact the Director of Training of their previous
Training Centre to discuss the recommencement of surgical training in that Centre in the following
year, pending an available position.
For former trainees who satisfy eligibility criteria 2B, the applicant should contact the Director of
Training of their previous Training Centre to discuss the recommencement of surgical training in that
Centre in the following year. If there is no position available in the original Training Centre, then
negotiations will be undertaken with other Training Centres to endeavour to enable training to
continue.