Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Feasibility Study
Chapter 3
FEASIBILITY STUDY
A. Operational Feasibility
______________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
company name)
_________________ department.
blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah
blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah
blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah
blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah
blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah
Problem area1. Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
65
Feasibility Study
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah.
Problem area2. Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah.
Problem area3. Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah.
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________.
66
Feasibility Study
______________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
B. Technical Feasibility
to the practical use of the system and also gives the full
be access online.
to ____________________________________________________.
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
70
Feasibility Study
Table 3.1
Software specifications
Software Specifications
Operating System Windows XP2, Windows 7
Web Programming Language Active Server Page (ASP)
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)
Web Design
Cascading Style Sheets (CSS)
Database Microsoft Access 2010
Office Application Microsoft Office 2007 or 2010
Browser Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox
Others Adobe Acrobat Reader 10.0
Table 3.2
Minimum Hardware requirements
Computer Hardware
Specifications
Components
Processor 1.6 GHz processor
Memory 1 GB RAM
Monitor VGA with 800 x 600 dpi
Mouse/keyboard PS2 or USB
Database 5 GB free HD space
Network Hardware Router, RJ 55, Hub, Server, etc.
71
Feasibility Study
the following:
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah
Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah.
blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah
blah Blah.
Survey Result
_______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________.
Table 3.3
Major concerns that need changes or upgrade in the manual
system of _________
(Number of respondents = 5, _____ Personnel)
72
Feasibility Study
5 4 3 2 1
Item STATEMENT AWM DI
SA A U D SD
It is very difficult to locate
A 1 2 0 2 0 3.40 A
files of a patient when needed.
There is a prolong time of
B keeping an inventory of medical 1 2 0 2 0 3.40 A
supplies.
Duplication or inaccuracy of
C 0 3 0 0 2 2.80 U
data or information.
D Time wasting. (data search) 1 2 0 2 0 3.40 A
Unorganized files and records
using the traditional filing
cabinet like the patients’
records from different tests
E 1 2 2 0 0 3.80 A
(i.e., dental, blood pressure),
assessments and results when
they were admitted from the
infirmary office.
Files or patients’ records are
not secured if using filing
cabinet. There is a chance that
F somebody who is not authorized 2 3 0 0 0 4.40 SA
from the office that will
intervene from confidential
files.
Generation of reports is slow
especially when retyping the
G necessary and important from a 2 1 0 2 0 3.60 A
requesting patient and other
means of filing records.
File maintenance from a day to
H day basis is difficult (updates 1 2 0 2 0 3.40 A
and data entry)
Other jobs and responsibilities
can be delayed, moved or
ignored because of prolong
I 2 1 0 2 0 3.60 A
processes using the manual
method of information
management.
Maybe additional employee is
needed to do other
J 4 1 0 0 0 4.80 SA
responsibilities inside the
office.
Legend:
Interval
Scale Descriptive Interpretation
Range
5 4.20 – 5.00 Strongly Agree
73
Feasibility Study
AWM = [(SA*5)+(A*4)+(U*3)+(D*2)+(SD*1)] / N
OWM = sum of all Average Weighted Mean / number of items
= ((3.4)+(3.4)+(2.8)+(3.4)+(3.8)+
(4.4)+(3.6)+(3.4)+(3.6)+(4.8) / 10
= 3.66 (Agree)
Analysis of Data
______________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________.
Interview Result
74
Feasibility Study
use/encounter/experienced/applied).
interview made.
Question 1: qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ?
Answer: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
Question 2: qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ?
Answer: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
C. Economic Feasibility
75
Feasibility Study
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah.
Table 3.4
Existing Annual Expense
Table 3.5
Proposed Annual Expense
76
Feasibility Study
Table 3.6
One-Time Cost
Hardware Cost:
3,000.00
4,450.00
Computer(one set) 25,000.00
Software Cost:
Enrolment System
20,000.00
w/ 1 year maintenance & user training
Total: 52,450.00
Table 3.7
Existing Operational Cost with Employee Salary
Table 3.8
Proposed Operational Cost with Employee Salary
Total : 20,198.50
Table 3.8
Savings on the proposed system
Return on Investment
= (??? - ???) / ???
=
=
78
Feasibility Study
Table 16
Annual Cash Flow of proposed On-LANES
Over-All
Yearly NPV Cash NPV Cash
Year Flow Flow
0 28,450.00 28,450.00
1 8,398.64 (20,051.37)
2 7,635.12 (12,416.24)
3 6,939.61 (5,476.63)
4 6,464.76 828.59
5 5,735.89 6,564.48
Figure 3
Break-Even Analysis
50,000.00
40,000.00
AMOUNT
SAVINGS
30,000.00
COST
20,000.00
10,000.00 Actual Break-even Point
-
1 2 3 4 5
YEAR
Days(s):
= ((6, 464.76 – 828.59) / 6, 464.76)
= .87 * 30
= 26.15
Approximately 27 days