You are on page 1of 5

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 15 (2008) 828–832


www.elsevier.com/locate/ultsonch

Convenient ultrasound mediated synthesis of substituted


pyrazolones under solvent-free conditions
Mohammad M. Mojtahedi *, Mashal Javadpour, M. Saeed Abaee *

Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Research Center of Iran, P.O. Box 14335-186, Tehran, Iran

Received 5 November 2007; received in revised form 17 February 2008; accepted 20 February 2008
Available online 29 February 2008

Abstract

Smooth condensation of hydrazine derivatives with various ß-keto esters was performed under solvent-free conditions by using ultra-
sound irradiation to facilitate the formation of pyrazolone derivatives in good to excellent amounts within very short time periods.
Ó 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Pyrazolone; Hydrazine; Ultrasound irradiation; Solvent-free reaction

1. Introduction some illustrative examples, ring opening of epoxides [11],


reduction of carbonyl compounds [12], Suzuki cross-cou-
Pyrazolone derivatives are of particular importance in pling reaction [13], acetylation of alcohols [14], aldol reac-
pharmaceutical chemistry [1] due to their numerous appli- tion [15], oximes synthesis [16], reductive coupling of
cations as analgesic, antipyretic, antiarthritic, uricosuric, amines [17], and alcohols protection [18] can be pointed out.
antiinflammatory, and antiphlogistic properties. Particu- Pyrazolones are traditionally synthesized by treatment
larly, the 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one derivative of b-keto esters with hydrazine substrates under acidic con-
(edaravone) [2] acts as a radical scavenger to interrupt ditions at elevated temperature [19]. A number of alterna-
the preoxidative chain reactions and membrane disintegra- tive methods have been documented in the literature for
tions associated with ischemia [3]. In addition, these com- the synthesis of these compounds [20]. Recent develop-
pounds are appropriate precursors for industrial ments include solid-phase synthesis [21], a two-step reac-
preparation of herbicides [4], liquid crystals [5], dyes [6], tion of benzoyl hydrazones with silyl enolates in the
thermally stable polymers [7], and color photographical presence of catalytic amounts of Sc(OTf)3 [22], and micro-
compounds [8]. On the other hand, chemical oxidation of wave irradiation techniques [23]. In the framework of our
pyrazolones to azo dienophiles provides suitable substrates investigations on the development of green chemical proce-
for hetero Diels–Alder cycloadditions [9]. dures [24], we would like to herein report a novel and envi-
In recent years, synthetic applications of ultrasonic irra- ronmentally safe procedure for rapid preparation of
diation in various types of organic transformations are various pyrazolone derivatives using ultrasound irradiation
demonstrated widely in chemical literature [10]. Conse- (Scheme 1).
quently, many protocols have been developed to carry out
chemical processes in shorter reaction times and under
2. Method
milder and more environmentally friendly conditions. As
2.1. Apparatus and analysis
*
Corresponding authors. Tel.: +98 21 44580720; fax: +98 21 44580762.
E-mail addresses: mojtahedi@ccerci.ac.ir (M.M. Mojtahedi), abaee@ Reactions were monitored by TLC and GC. FT-IR
ccerci.ac.ir (M.S. Abaee). spectra were recorded using KBr disks on a Bruker

1350-4177/$ - see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.02.010
M.M. Mojtahedi et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 15 (2008) 828–832 829

O O O 43.5, 119.3, 125.5, 129.3, 138.5, 156.7, 171.0; MS m/z (%)


PhNHNH2
R
174 (M+, 100), 105 (55), 91 (94), 77 (92); IR (KBr, cm 1)
R O )))) N N 2420, 1594, 1530.
Ph
1a-h 2a-k
2.2.3. 3-(Furan-3-yl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2c)
Scheme 1. M.p. 182 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 5.92 (s, 2H), 6.80–
8.00 (m, 8H), 11.90 (br s, 1H); MS m/z (%) 226 (M+, 52), 93
Vector-22 infrared spectrometer and absorptions were (100), 77 (68); IR (KBr, cm 1) 2900, 1595, 1557.
reported as wave numbers (cm 1). NMR spectra were
obtained on a FT-NMR Bruker Ultra ShieldTM 2.2.4. 4-Ethyl-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one
(500 MHz) or Bruker AC 80 MHz instrument as CDCl3, (2d)
DMSO-d6, or CDCl3-DMSO-d6 solutions and the chemical M.p. 108 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 0.85 (t, J= 7.5 Hz, 3H),
shifts were expressed as d units with Me4Si as the internal 1.88–2.06 (m, 2H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 7.23 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.43
standard. Mass spectra were obtained on a Finnigan Mat (dd, J = 7.4, 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR
8430 apparatus at ionization potential of 70 eV. Com- (CDCl3) d 7.3, 13.4, 29.7, 81.3, 119.3, 125.8, 129.2, 137.9,
pound 1c was prepared using available methods [25]. All 162.4, 174.3; MS m/z (%) 202 (M+, 63), 174 (23), 91 (42),
other chemicals and reagents were purchased from com- 77 (100); IR (KBr, cm 1) 2965, 1687, 1496.
mercial sources and were used without further purification.
Sonication was performed using a Sartorius Ultrasonic- 2.2.5. 1,3-Diphenyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2e)
homogenizer LABSONICÒP 230 V/50 Hz instrument with M.p. 88 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 3.90 (s, 2H), 7.27 (t,
a frequency of 24 KHz and nominal power of 460 W/cm2. J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.52 (m, 5H), 7.81–7.84 (m, 2H),
The intensity level of irradiation was adjusted at 90% and 8.02 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) d 40.0,
40% levels for the synthesis of 2a–h and 2i–k, respectively. 119.5, 125.7, 126.5, 129.3, 129.4, 131.1, 131.3, 138.6,
In all reactions the tip of the sonotrode was located in the 155.1, 170.7; MS m/z (%) 236 (M+, 91), 194 (42), 103
same position just under the liquid surface in order to (80), 91 (79), 77 (100); IR (KBr, cm 1) 2965, 1705, 1593.
obtain optimal sonication and reproducible results.
2.2.6. 3-Isopropyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2f)
M.p. 78 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 1.28 (d, J = 7 Hz, 6H),
2.2. General procedure 2.79 (m, 1H), 3.45 (s, 2H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.41
(dd, J = 7.4, 8 Hz, 2H), 7.92 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H); 13C
A mixture containing phenyl hydrazine or hydrazine NMR (CDCl3) d 20.5, 31.2, 40.3, 119.3, 125.4, 129.2,
(5 mmol) and 1 (5 mmol) was sonicated in a 10 mL test 138.7, 164.7, 171.1; MS m/z (%) 202 (M+, 100), 187 (42),
tube for appropriate length of time (as indicated in Table 91 (28), 40 (97).
1) until TLC showed complete disappearance of the start-
ing materials. In temperature controlled experiments, reac- 2.2.7. 1-Phenyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one
tions were performed in a water bath at 25 ± 1 °C. The (2g)
reaction mixture was poured into ice–water mixture and M.p. 170 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3-DMSO-d6) d 5.62 (s,
the precipitates were collected by filtration. The pure prod- 1H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (dd, J = 7.5, 8 Hz,
uct was obtained by recrystallization of the precipitates 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3-DMSO-
using ethanol and water. Products were identified based d6) d; MS m/z (%) 228 (M+, 18), 105 (20), 95 (33), 77
on their melting point, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and IR data. (100); IR (KBr, cm 1) 2720, 1758, 1599.
Known structures were verified by comparison of their
data with those reported in the literature [26]. 2.2.8. 2-Phenyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-2H-indazol-3(3aH)-one
(2h)
2.2.1. 1-Phenyl-3-propyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2a) M.p. 160 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 1.46–1.57 (m, 2H),
M.p. 110 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 1.06 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1.74–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.98–2.01 (m, 1H), 2.17–2.21 (m, 1H),
3H), 1.68–1.76 (m, 2H), 2.50 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.44 (s, 2.39 (ddd, J = 5.7, 12.9, 13, 1H), 2.55–2.59 (m, 1H), 2.82
2H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (dd, J = 7.4, 7.7 Hz, (dd, J = 3, 15, 1H), 3.18 (dd, J = 7.4, 11.9, 1H), 7.19–7.22
2H), 7.91 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) d 14.2, (m, 1H), 7.41–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.92–7.95 (m, 2H); 13C NMR
20.4, 33.5, 42.2, 119.3, 125.4, 129.2, 138.6, 160.3, 171.0; (CDCl3) d 24.7, 27.9, 29.1, 29.8, 50.0, 119.2, 125.3, 129.2,
MS m/z (%) 202 (M+, 100), 173 (59), 105 (32), 91 (99), 138.7, 163.8, 173.8; MS m/z (%) 214 (M+, 100), 185 (12),
77 (97); IR (KBr, cm 1) 2928, 1595, 1540. 109 (24), 77 (25), 40 (25); IR (KBr, cm 1) 2935, 1705, 1635.

2.2.2. 3-Methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2b) 2.2.9. 3-(Furan-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2i)


M.p. 127 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 2.24 (s, 3H), 3.47 (s, M.p. 212 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 5.73 (s, 1H), 6.64–
2H), 7.22 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (dd, J = 7.3, 8 Hz, 7.75 (m, 3H), 11.20 (br s, 2H); MS m/z (%) 150 (M+, 100),
2H), 7.91 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) d 17.4, 121 (31), 93 (45); IR (KBr, cm 1) 2598, 1608, 954.
830 M.M. Mojtahedi et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 15 (2008) 828–832

Table 1
Ultrasound promoted synthesis of pyrazolone derivatives
Entry Substrate Hydrazine Product Time (min) Yield (%)a
O O 20
1 C6H5NHNH2 91
O 1a N 2a
O N
Ph

O O
2 C6H5NHNH2 N 2
2b 15 84
O O N
1b
Ph

O O O

3 O C6H5NHNH2 2c
2 95
1c N
O N
O
Ph
Et
O O

4 O C6H5NHNH2 N 2d 20 85
1d O N
Et
Ph

Ph
O O
5 C6H5NHNH2 N 2e 2 95
O 1e Ph O N
Ph

O O
6 C6H5NHNH2 2f 5 94
O 1f N
O N
Ph
CF3
O O
7 C6H5NHNH2 2g 25 95
N
O 1g CF3 O N
Ph

Ph
O O
N N
8 O 1h C6H5NHNH2 2h 15 94
O

O O O
9 O NH2NH2 2b 92
1c N 2i
O O N
H

O O Et

10 O NH2NH2 N 2j 2b 94
1d
O N
Et H

O O
11 NH2NH2 N 2k 2b 90
O 1a O N
H
a
Isolated yields.
b
Lower power.

2.2.10. 4-Ethyl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2j) 2.2.11. 3-Propyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one (2K)


M.p. 222 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 1.12 (t, J = 7 Hz, M.p. 207 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 0.96 (t, J = 7.5 Hz,
3H), 2.11 (s, 3H), 2.42 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 10.30 (br, 2H); 3H), 1.57 (m, 2H), 2.50 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 5.32 (s, 1H),
MS m/z (%), 126 (M+, 76), 111 (90), 98 (42), 42 (100); IR 10.50 (br s, 2H); MS m/z (%) 126 (M+, 52), 111 (25), 98
(KBr, cm 1) 2965, 1616, 1404. (100); IR (KBr, cm 1) 2735, 1620, 1507.
M.M. Mojtahedi et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 15 (2008) 828–832 831

2.2.12. Ethyl 4,4,4-trifluoro-3-(2-phenylhydrazono)butano- Based on these observations, a mechanistic pathway as


ate (3g) depicted in Fig. 1 can be proposed in which an immine
M.p. 170 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 1.35 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, intermediate is formed first which subsequently undergoes
3H), 3.55 (s, 2H), 4.28 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (t, intermolecular condensation to form the final product.
J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (dd, J = 7.3, This hypothesis was supported by isolation of the pro-
8 Hz, 2H), 9.12 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) d 14.4, 32.6, posed immine intermediate 3g for the reaction between
62.8, 114.4, 120.0, 122.6, 123.0, 129.7, 143.8, 168.5; MS phenyl hydrazine and ethyl 4,4,4-trifluoro-3-oxobutanoate
m/z (%) 274 (M+, 10), 228 (45), 105 (10), 40 (100); IR (entry 7).
(KBr, cm 1) 2733, 1720, 1601, 1565.
4. Conclusion
3. Results and discussion
We have reported a rapid and efficient solvent-free
First, an equimolar mixture of phenyl hydrazine and method for the preparation of substituted pyrazolones
ethyl butrylacetate 1a (R = n-Pr) was sonicated under var- via condensation of hydrazine derivatives with various b-
ious sets of conditions. The best results were obtained in keto esters under ultrasonic conditions. Yields of products
the presence of no solvent leading to sole formation of 1- are high, reactions proceed at ambient temperature, no
phenyl-3-propyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one 2a via elimination extra catalyst or additive is required, and the conditions
of water and ethanol after 15 min sonication (Table 1, are safe from environmental point of view.
entry 1). The solid product was easily separated from the
reaction mixture by aqueous work up. Control experiments Acknowledgement
showed the crucial rule of the ultrasonic irradiation for the
reaction to proceed and excluded the effect of a possible Partial financial support by the Ministry of Science, Re-
simultaneous thermal activation. Therefore, conduction search, and Technology of Iran is greatly appreciated.
of the reaction by maintaining the temperature at
25 ± 1 °C yielded similar results after 17 min sonicaion. References
Alternatively, in the absence of irradiation, the same mix-
ture gave only 41% of 2a after several hours treatment of [1] (a) T. Ueda, H. Mase, N. Oda, I. Ito, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 29 (1981)
the mixture at elevated temperatures (140 °C). These obser- 3522;
(b) J. Hukki, P. Laitinen, J.E. Alberty, Pharm. Acta Helv. 43 (1968)
vations suggest that the ultrasonic irradiation can signifi-
704.
cantly assist the process, as also previously proposed by [2] H. Nakagawa, R. Ohyama, A. Kimata, T. Suzuki, N. Miyata, Bioorg.
Wang [27] and Entezari [28], presumably by providing Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 5939.
the required energy for the transition state of the reaction. [3] (a) H. Kawai, H. Nakai, M. Suga, S. Yuki, T. Watanabe, K.I. Saito,
To examine the feasibility of a relatively large-scale synthe- J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 281 (1997) 921;
(b) T. Watanabe, S. Yuki, M. Egawa, H. Nishi, J. Pharmacol. Exp.
sis, a mixture containing 50 mmol of each of the two reac-
Ther. 268 (1994) 1597;
tants was subjected to the reaction conditions for 25 min (c) T.W. Wu, L.H. Zeng, J. Wu, K.P. Fung, Life Sci. 71 (2002) 2249.
leading to isolation of more than 90% of 2a. [4] P. Plath, W. Rohr, B. Wuerzer, Ger. Offen. DE 79-2920933, 19790523
Other b-keto esters reacted in the same manner with (1980).
phenyl hydrazine (entries 2–8) or hydrazine (entries 9–11) [5] C. Cativiela, J.L. Serrano, M.M. Zurbano, J. Org. Chem. 60 (1995)
3074.
to obtain 84–95% of their respective pyrazolone derivatives
[6] S. Sugiura, S. Ohno, O. Ohtani, K. Izumi, T. Kitamikado, H. Asai, K.
in short time periods. In case of hydrazine, reactions could Kato, M. Hori, H. Fujimura, J. Med. Chem. 20 (1977) 80.
complete at lower power level of sonication within shorter [7] M.W. Sabaa, F.H. Oraby, A.S. Abdel-Naby, R.R. Mohamed, Polym.
time periods. All reactions proceeded cleanly and resulted Degrad. Stab. 91 (2006) 911.
easily in precipitation of single products. [8] (a) J.D. Kendall, G.F. Duffin, US Patent 2,704,762 (1955);
(b) G.A. Reynolds, US Patent 2,688,548 (1954).
[9] M.P. Johnson, C.J. Moody, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 (1985) 71.
O O O OH [10] G. Cravotto, P. Cintas, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 (2006) 180.
[11] A. Kamal, S.F. Adil, M. Arifuddin, Ultrason. Sonochem. 12 (2005)
EtO CF3 H2..
NNHPh EtO CF3 429.
HN
.. NHPh [12] Y. Peng, W. Zhong, G. Song, Ultrason. Sonochem. 12 (2005) 169.
[13] (a) G. Cravotto, G. Palmisano, S. Tollari, G.M. Nano, A. Penoni,
Ultrason. Sonochem. 120 (2005) 91;
CF3 (b) R. Rajagopal, D.V. Jarikote, K.V. Srinivasan, Chem. Commun.
CF3 (2002) 616.
N O OH2 [14] A.R. Gholap, K. Venkatesan, T. Daniel, R.J. Lahoti, K.V. Sriniva-
N NHPh san, Green Chem. 5 (5) (2003) 693.
O N O O EtO CF3 [15] G. Cravotto, A. Demetri, G.M. Nano, G. Palmisano, A. Penoni, S.
2g 3g HN
Ph Et .. NHPh Tagliapietra, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 22 (2003) 4438.
[16] J. Li, X. Li, T. Li, Ultrason. Sonochem. 13 (2006) 200.
Fig. 1. Proposed mechanism for the condensation of hydrazines with [17] M.M. Mojtahedi, M.R. Saidi, J.S. Shirzi, M. Bolourtchian, Synth.
acetoacetates. Commun. 31 (2001) 3587.
832 M.M. Mojtahedi et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 15 (2008) 828–832

[18] M.M. Mojtahedi, M.S. Abaee, V. Hamidi, A. Zolfaghari, Ultrason. [24] (a) M.M. Mojtahedi, E. Akbarzadeh, R. Sharifi, M.S. Abaee, Org.
Sonochem. 14 (2007) 596. Lett. 9 (2007) 2791;
[19] (a) L.F. Tietze, A. Steinmetz, Synlett (1996) 667; (b) M.M. Mojtahedi, H. Abbasi, M.S. Abaee, Phosphorus Sulfur
(b) S. Kuo, L. Huang, H. Nakamura, J. Med. Chem. 27 (1984) Silicon 181 (2006) 1541;
539. (c) M.M. Mojtahedi, H. Abbasi, M.S. Abaee, J. Mol. Catal. A:
[20] (a) B.B. Gavrilenko, S.I. Miller, J. Org. Chem. 40 (1975) 2720; Chem. 250 (2006) 6;
(b) M. Scobie, G. Tennant, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1993) (d) M.M. Mojtahedi, M.S. Abaee, H. Abbasi, J. Iran Chem. Soc. 3
1756; (2006) 93;
(c) Q. Hu, H. Guan, C. Hu, J. Fluorine Chem. 75 (1995) 51; (e) M.M. Mojtahedi, M.S. Abaee, H. Abbasi, Can. J. Chem. (2006)
(d) H.N. Al-Jallo, A. Al-Khashab, I.G. Sallomi, J. Chem. Soc., 429;
Perkin Trans. 1 (1972) 1022; (f) M.S. Abaee, M.M. Mojtahedi, R. Sharifi, M.M. Zahedi, H.
(e) Q. Zhang, L. Lu, Tetrahedron Lett. 41 (2000) 8545; Abbasi, K. Tabar-Heidar, J. Iran Chem. Soc. 3 (2006) 293;
(f) M.T. Omar, F.A. Sherif, Synthesis (1981) 742. (g) M.M. Mojtahedi, M.S. Abaee, M.M. Heravi, F.K. Behbahani,
[21] L.F. Tietze, H. Evers, T. Hippe, A. Steinmetz, E. Topken, Eur. J. Org. Monatsh. Chem. 138 (2007) 95;
Chem. (2001) 1631 (and references therein). (h) M.M. Mojtahedi, M.H. Ghasemi, M.S. Abaee, M. Bolourtchian,
[22] (a) S. Kobayashi, T. Furuta, K. Sugita, H. Oyamada, Synlett (1998) Arkivoc (2005) 68.
1019; [25] Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, fifth ed., Longman
(b) H. Oyamada, S. Kobayashi, Synlett (1998) 249; Scientific and Technical, UK, 1989, pp. 620–621.
(c) S. Kobayashi, T. Furuta, K. Sugita, O. Okitsu, H. Oyamada, [26] (a) Dictionary of Organic Compounds, Chapman Hall, NY, 1986,
Tetrahedron Lett. 40 (1999) 1341. M-03205, M-03448, E-00702, H-01750, E-01033, H-03241;
[23] (a) M.M. Mojtahedi, M.R. Jalali, M.S. Abaee, M. Bolourtchian, (b) H.A. Torrey, J.E. Zanetti, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 30 (1908) 1241.
Hetrocycl. Commun. 12 (2006) 225; [27] M.-L. Wang, V. Rajendran, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 273 (2007) 5.
(b) M.M. Mojtahedi, M.R. Jalali, M. Bolourtchian, Synth. Commun. [28] M.H. Entezari, A. Heshmati, A.S. Yazdi, Ultrason. Sonochem. 12
36 (2006) 51. (2005) 137.

You might also like