Abstract 

In this book, we will go deeper into what Law of synergy of sides is. We will

also ask and answer the question of how Ascending Equalities is the simple

symbol system of synergy of sides. We will also consider the understanding of

complements and contradictions and their connections between each other. We

will also go into the various kinds and structures of Ascending Equalities. This

book will also illustrate the analogy of Ascending Equalities as weight scales.

  
 Table of Contents

Introduction

1) What is the Law of Synergy of Sides (SOS)

2) Ascending Equalities are Synergy of Sides in Symbol Form

3) Understanding Contradictions and Complements

4) The Structure of AE (Ascending Equalities)

5) Difference (Balance) and Sum (Harmony) AE

a. Harmony AE (H-AE)

b. Balance AE (B-AE)

6) Cyclic and Linear AE

a. Cyclic AE (C-AE)

b. Linear AE (L-AE)

7) Weight Scale Analogy of Synergy of Sides

Conclusion
 Introduction

This book will illustrate the mechanics and the structure of Ascending

Equalities and the basic complexities of these mathematical forms.  Ascending

equalities are the building blocks of Ascending mathematics as conventional

equalities are building blocks of modern math. Ascending equalities are one of

the most basic elements of Ascending mathematics.  Also given their versatile

nature they can link up to form various simple geometric shapes. Conventional

equalities in ascending math are at a ratio in Ascending math of 1 to infinite.

Conventional equalities that modern math uses are less than 1% of Ascending

equalities. All equalities dealt with by modern math will be proven to be “0”

synergy value then this makes modern math equalities a particular type of

Ascending math equalities.  

 
     

  

  

(0)What is the Law Synergy of Sides(SOS)?  

  

      The law Synergy of Sides(SOS) is the universal law. Everything is nothing but

bundles of complements and contradictions. Those complements that act as

bridges for other complements are called synergy.  Synergy acts as the bridge

between complements and contradictions, and complement nor contradictions

are truly directly connected. Opposites are connected and spring from a common

root. The majority of synergy are neutral compared to the opposites they bridge. 

  Contradictions are immature complementaries, immature evenness.

Contradictions can also be seen as complements placed wrong. Complements are

the optimal connection between differences.  

So, all laws in culture and nature are merely manifestations of SOS. Every

law we think is universal to that plane of existence or sphere of reality originated

from SOS. I say this because everything in existence and imagination is nothing

but complexities of SOS.

  
 (1) Ascending Equalities are Synergy of Sides in Symbol System Form 

  

  

Ascending equalities is the unit symbol system of the SOS. Ascending

equalities are the GPS of arithmetic and mathematics, the compass of

mathematics, and it represents dynamic evenness. Evenness isn't a stagnant or

fixed quality, but it is forever changing.     

The Ascending Equalities has a nucleus and a peripheral side of it. The

peripheral side of it is what the equal sign is connecting/processing. The synergy

values are the values of the equals sign.  

Ascending Equalities are comparable to compasses. The law of identity

Equalities specialized by modern math is only one type of Ascending Equality out

of infinite unique types.  

  
  

  

The simple structure of AE is also complex. Simplicity is complex yet to be

understood. Simplicity is the introduction to complexity…the building block of

complexity. AE and conventional equalities appear quite simple but they have a

complex structure to it. AE and conventional equalities (CE) not only have synergy
values(SV) of the equal sign but even equalities have equalities in them. Sides

have SV with SV and even SV has synergy values. A single AE and CE are one

binary unit long and it can be considered as the simplest dimension of AE

networks(Chaines).

(2) Understanding Contradictions and Complements 

“Equalities don’t become uneven and equal signs establish balance.”

 In this book, we will see in great detail why “equalities don’t become

uneven and equal signs establish balance”. We will also see why

contradictions that mathematics proved to be absurd isn’t absurd at all and

the proof from modern math that it is is invalid.

Understanding contradictions and complements deals with the first 3

mathematical qualities…Origin, Transparency, and Order. What engines

everything that exists and in imagination is SOS. The grounds, authenticity,

crispness, truth, and order are inherited in equalities. Equalities are the symbols of

those. Everything in the world is merely a compilation of contradictions and

complements. Complements are opposites that augment or enhance each other.

Contradictions are opposites that inhibit each other. Complements are a

progressive SOS and contradictions are non-progressive or potentially progressive

complements. Thus contradictions are complements that are yet to manifest.

Anything authentic and with grounds has internal engines that make it what it is.

The unit of grounds, authenticity, crispness, and order is Equality…Ascending

Equalities (AE) to be specific. Equalities are the clearest and truthful simple

system of signs. Everyone wishes their understanding of the most perplexing thing
is simple like 1+1 = 2 or 2=2. 1+1 = 2 is solid and genuine. Also, it shows a

definite basic order of things.

Contradictions are complements yet to be understood. However, in

measurement, it isn’t considered a contradiction but a division of singularity

and the unity of multiplicity. Contradictions in measurements is understood

as simple complementary. For example, feet equals 12 inches, when we

take away the names of the values it looks like any other contradiction,

1=12. Thus 1foot = 12 inches is a specific manifestation of 1=12. Since the

Synergy values are “0” then 1=12 means 12 is a unit and the unit(1) is a

division of 12. So 1=12 is a combination of unity and division, unity of 12

as one and one divided into 12 parts. 1=12 means one unit is a division of

12.
 1=2 means 1 has the division of 2. 3 = 5 means 3 has a division of

5 or 3/5. 2=10 means 2 is divided into 10 parts. Complements with zero-

synergy value (Z-SV) are fractions. Any equality that has a “0” synergy

means the differences connected is undifferenced.

 As we have seen so far is that placing a “0” on the top and bottom of

the equal sign doesn’t violate modern mathematical law. It also makes the

equalities seem redundant, redundant enough that it can be left blank.

However, we will see it's not the case when we deal with the absurd

contradictions of equalities. It clears equality up but it appears redundant.

Redundancy is the beginning of necessity. These values I placed above and

below the equality are SV or values of determination. Once we apply what

we know in identifying the conventional equalities(CE) to what modern

math calls “absurd” contradictions then we get not contradictions but

complements. Thus the problem of solving contradictions is a problem of

balance…problem of difference.

So when I put the correct synergy value for the "absurd"

mathematical equalities I get something necessary, I get Ascending

Equalities (AE). By placing the right synergy values above and below the

equalities considered contradictions. Now the complements I created from

contradictions are as valid as the CV...as valid as the Z-SV "equalities".

 The inter-implication proof is the mechanics of the equalities. These mechanics

don’t violate or fundamentally restrict what modern math is. But rather it shows us

clearly that the root of modern math is belonged and is among Ascending

Equalities(AE). AE are equalities that not only include the conventional equalities

but also equalities with non-zero synergy values(NZ-SV). NZ-SV is an

inexhaustible class of Equalities that all CEs are a subset of. CEs are less than 1%

of AE since among numbers “0” is less than 1% of the totality of numbers.

(3)The structure of AE(Ascending Equalities)

The AE is composed of three things. The side values located on each side of the

equal sign, the equal sign and synergy values located on the bottom and top of the

equal sign. I think it is important to know the structure of the AE which will

simplify things.
 The CEs (Conventional Equalities) are equalities fixed or restricted to zero-

synergy values. All scientific and mathematical formulas are based solely on CEs

rather than AEs(Ascending Equalities). It means the scope of these Scientific and

mathematical CEs is less than 1% of what these formulas would've been if they

were AE-based. Thus it also restricts the application of AE in scientific,

engineering, and technological endeavors. Less than 1% is a heavy restriction on

something to the point of that "something" being inactive or nonexistent.

 (4)Difference (Balance) and Sum (Harmony) AE

Mathematics is the study of seven main qualities that exist in reality and

fantasy. Math investigates the Origin (grounds and authenticity), Transparency

(Clear Truth), Order ( priority of elements in a whole), Versatility (The change of

priority of elements in a whole), Reliability (the oneness of the priority of

elements), Accountability (the stability of the oneness of the priority of elements)

and Measurability (the utilities of all of above). Once we come to a basic

distinction of SOS we also go into Difference(balance) and Sum(Harmony) AE.

We can also call the sum equalities “harmony” equalities because the

synergy values are the merging of the sides. Harmony is the unity of

diversity working as one. The difference is also “balance” equalities. The SV

of these equalities shows what is between each side that makes them

balanced. Balance unlike harmony denotes the stability or integrity of

opposites, harmony denotes the merging or oneness of opposites.

 (A)Harmony AE (H-AE)

In the ascending proof of the Harmony AE, the interpretation of

calculation is as follows. 1-2 means one subtracted from two. I set it up

where the thing being subtracted is on the rightmost side of the left side of

the equal sign. I did that for clarity sake in which the inter-implication proof

can have the same flow as the one that uses addition, in balance AE.
 Harmony is the versatility of evenness. Versatility is the change of order

and merging what comes first and what comes second is a simple change

of order. Harmony is the refreshment of the law SOS.

 Harmony formulated is AEs that have synergy values that are the sum of

the sides. The SV is redundant and indicates no direction. Either way, you

add the sides together, the same SV appears. I call AE that has for their SV

the some of their sides harmony because harmony means the merging of

opposites. Aspects become one and not distinct. Balance indicates

distinctions of opposites.

Harmony’s Law of Identity is Harmony AE’s law of identity. Harmony is

the merging of opposites and thus the change of priority or order…

versatility. Since harmony is the merging of balance rather than the stability

of the distinction of opposites…since it doesn’t balance then the synergy

value is always the sum of two sides. So the fusion of opposite as a single

value is harmony. Their fusion is the root reformed.

When you compare the law of identity as a harmony AE and law of

identity in its balanced form, the law of identity manifests diversity in

harmony form rather than in balanced form. The CV has zero synergy value

no matter what values the sides are.

 (B)Balance AE (B-AE)

Balance AE are AEs that the synergy values are the difference of sides.

The difference indicates distinctions and distinctions indicate bridges that

stabilize distinctions. Unlike H-AE balance AE(B-AE for short) has a definite

direction. The law of identity is a B-AE, any side negation is identical to the

side negated. Zero-synergy happens when sides become self-negating,

identical.
Balance AE and Harmony AE are complementary and are inverses of each

other. The law of identity has the SV of 0 in Balance AE but has a double
that of each side as its SV in harmony AE. In harmony AE the CE has none

zero values. The reason they take on such values is that we are now dealing

with the harmony of equality not the balance of equality. Harmony AE

shows the diversity of the Law of Idenity in balance AE. While harmony AE

shows the singularity of polar AEs. Just like the law of identity derived by its

SV give rise to halting, the derivation of polar forms in harmony AE

produces halting. Thus balance AE reveres diversity while harmony AE

reveres similarities.
 It is the B-AE that the law of identity is identified in. The H-AE does not

identify the law of identity in it as clearly. The Law of Identity is identified

indirectly by H-AE be being identified first in B-AE.

 (5)Cyclic and Linear AE

Cycles and linearity synergies are the essences and whole relationships

respectively. There are two types of AE one using numbers and one using

strictly digits. Linear and cyclic AE. Numeral Ascending Equalities are linear,

whereas Equalities that uses only digits are cyclic. 

(A) Cyclic AE (C-AE)

Notice in Cyclic AE the forward and the reversal of the proof has SV

that is not equal in quantity. The difference in the number of SV is the

distinct feature of AE working with only digits. In any cycle system, 0

becomes the alpha and the omega. 0 becomes the beginning and end.

Cycles expose the nature of things. Innate or core pattern.

(B)Linear AE (L-AE)
 Linear ascending equalities(L-AE) show the wholeness, the

completeness, the basic systems of basis. Not just the skeleton or cycle of a

phenomenon but the essence immerse…living in and among the whole its

engines. Alive!
 (6) Weight Scale Analogy of Synergy of Sides

The weight scale is the perfect analog of the equalities and AE. The

typical but simple weight scale has a weight bar and a fulcrum. The

variables in the refinery weight scale are the weights themselves. But, in

ascending weight scales the amount of contact the fulcrum can make with

the weight bar isn’t restricted to a point on the fulcrum. Instead of the

fulcrum making contact with the weight bar at a point(insignificant

dimension) the ascending scale fulcrum can make contact where the point

of contact isn’t a point at all but a length.

 As an analogy, the weight scale can be an analog to equalities.

Ascending scales can be an analogy of AE. The conventional weight scale

can model any CE. Since CE is fixed at the value of zero as their synergy
value then the contact of the fulcrum with the weight bar at a point is

mechanical parallelism of AE.

 Just a little bit of noteworthy notes. The scales we use are simple

machines. The complex machines (i.e. robots) are as good as the simple

machines that predicate them. Yet the scales we use are analogs to CE. It

means every scale we have created so far, are scales with the fulcrum value

of “0”. These types of scales splinter mechanical advantage from balance.

These scales do not fuse mechanical advantage with balance. Mechanical

advantage is when one can apply a force smaller than what is required to

move or change a larger force. Less work to create a larger outcome in

comparison. In physics and mechanical sciences, mechanical advantage and

balance are not one but two separate things. Balance provides the stability

of mechanical advantage. Notice the lever which is also a scale has to have

the fulcrum closer to a larger force for the smaller force to move it. It means

the scale must lose balance to gain a mechanical advantage. However, an

Ascending Scale which has a fulcrum value higher than “0” maintains

balance while acquiring mechanical advantage.

 \ Conclusion

As we conclude this book we should now understand what an AE is and

how is CV the minority among AE. We have seen the four basic types of AE.

The Linear and Cyclic AE and the Balance and Harmony AE. We have also

seen the parallels shown between the law of identity and polar AE with H-

AE and B-AE forms. We have also seen how we can use scales to represent

B-AE forms.