1. In traditional assessment student’s attention will understandably be focused on and
limited to what is on the test. It refers to conventional methods of testing, usually standardized and use pen and paper with multiple-choice, true or false or matching type test items. In contrast, authentic assessments allow more student choice and construction in determining what is presented as evidence of proficiency. It refers to assessments wherein students are asked to perform real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of what they have learned. 2. Authentic assessment has a number of weaknesses. It can be addressed by the teacher providing multiple paths to demonstration. It is recommended that multiple and varied assessments be used so that 1) a sufficient number of samples are obtained (multiple), and 2) a sufficient variety of measures are used. Variety of measurement can be accomplished by assessing the students through different measures that allows you to see them apply what they have learned in different ways and from different perspectives. Typically, you will be more confident in the students' grasp of the material if they can do so. 3. Principle 1- Assessment should be Valid.
Authentic assessment that provides greater assurances of validity and reliability
throughout all stages of assessment within seafarer programs. It also lays the path to future research directions by establishing the agenda to test the practicality of the framework in the authentic assessment of seafarer students and also investigate the impact of students’ perception of increasing authenticity on performance scores in assessment tasks.