You are on page 1of 3

*06011001* 0601/1001

VI Semester 3 Yrs. LL.B./X Semester 5 Yrs. B.A.LL.B./B.B.A.LL.B.


Examination, June/July 2017
LAW OF EVIDENCE

Duration : 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100

Instructions : 1. Answer Q. No. 9 and any five of the remaining questions.


2. Q. No. 9 carries 20 marks and the remaining questions
carry 16 marks each.
3. Answer should be written either in English or Kannada
completely.

Q. No. 1. Discuss the relevancy of facts relating to motive, preparation


and conduct. Marks : 16
«æÂà¿á, Ô¨Üñœ æ ÊÜáñÜᤠ®ÜvñÜ Wæ æ ÓÜíŸí—st ÓÜíWÜ£WÜÙÜ ÓÜáÓÜퟨÜñœ ¿
æ á®Üá° aÜbìÔ.

Q. No. 2. ‘‘No confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against


a person accused of any offence’’ – Comment. What are the
exceptions recognised under the Indian Evidence Act ? Marks : 16
""BÃæãà²ñÜ ÊÜÂQ¤¿áá ±æäàÈàӅ A—PÝÄWæ ¯àw¨Ü ñܱæä³²³Wæ¿á®Üá° BñÜ®Ü
ËÃÜá¨Üœ ÃÜágáÊÝñÜá ÊÜÞvÜÆá ÓÝ«ÜÂËÆÉ'' & qàQÔ. D ŸWæY »ÝÃÜñÜ ÓÝPÜÒ$Â
A—¯¿áÊÜá¨ÜÈÉ WÜáÃÜá£ÔÃÜáÊÜ A±ÜÊݨÜWÜÙÜá ¿ÞÊÜâÊÜâ ?

Q. No. 3. Who is an ‘Expert’ ? When does his opinion become relevant ? Marks : 16
"ñÜgn ' Gí¨ÜÃæ ¿ÞÃÜá ? ñÜgn®Ü A¼±ÝÅ¿á ¿ÞÊÝWÜ ÓÜáÓÜퟨÜÊ
œ ÝXÃÜáñܤ¨æ ?

Q. No. 4. Discuss the law relating to Proof of Public Documents. Marks : 16


ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ¨ÜÓݤÊæàgáWÜÙÜ ÃÜágáÊÝ£®Ü PÜáÄñÝ¨Ü PÝ®Üã®Ü®Üá° aÜbìÔ.

Q. No. 5. What is an ‘Estoppel’ ? Explain the various kinds of estoppel. Marks : 16


˟í«Ü Gí¨ÜÃæ H®Üá ? ËË«Ü Äࣿá ˟í«ÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.

P.T.O.
0601/1001 -2- *06011001*
Q. No. 6. Explain the scope and extent of privilege conferred on Professional
communications as envisaged in the Indian Evidence Act. Marks : 16
»ÝÃÜ£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ A—¯¿áÊÜá¨ÜÈÉ ÓÜãbÔÃÜáÊÜíñæ ÊÜ꣤à¿á ÓÜíÊÜÖÜ®ÜWÜÙÜ
ËÍæàÐݗPÝÃÜ¨Ü Êݲ¤ ÊÜáñÜᤠWÝñÜÅÊÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.

Q. No. 7. What are leading questions ? When can they be asked ? Marks : 16
EñܤÃÜ ÓÜãaÜPÜ ±ÜÅÍæ°WÜÙæí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? AÊÜâWÜÙÜ®Üá° ¿ÞÊÝWÜ PæàÙܟÖÜá¨Üá ?

Q. No. 8. Write short note on any two : Marks : 8×2=16


¿ÞÊÜâ¨Ý¨ÜÃÜã GÃÜvÜPæR ÆZá q±Ü³~ ŸÃæÀáÄ :
a) Character Evidence
aÝÄñÜÅ ÓÝPÜÒ$Â
b) Dying declaration
ÊÜáÃÜ|PÝÈà®Ü NãàÐÜOæ
c) Alibi.
Aȹ.

Q. No. 9. Solve any two of the following : Marks : 10×2=20


PæÙÜX®ÜÊÜâWÜÙÜÈÉ ¿ÞÊÜâ¨Ý¨ÜÃÜã GÃÜvÜ®Üá° EñܤÄÔ :
a) The question in a proceeding, is whether ‘X’ and ‘Y’ were
married. The Party intends to present the fact that ‘X’ and ‘Y’
were usually received and treated by their friends as husband
and wife. Is such a fact relevant ? Explain. Marks : 10
"GP…Õ ' ÊÜáñÜᤠ"Êæç ' ËÊÝÖÜÊÝX¨ÝªÃæÁáà G®Üá°ÊÜ ±ÜÅÍæ° Jí¨Üá
ËaÝÃÜOæ¿áÈɨæ. "GP…Õ ' ÊÜáñÜᤠ"Êæç 'ÃÜ®Üá° AÊÜÃÜ Óæ°à×ñÜÃÜá ÓÝÊÜÞ®ÜÂÊÝX
WÜívÜ ÊÜáñÜᤠÖæívÜ£¿áíñæ ÔÌàPÜÄÔ ÓÜñÜRÄÓÜᣤ¨ÜªÃÜá G®Üá°ÊÜ ÓÜíWÜ£¿á®Üá°
±ÜPÜÒWÝÃÜ®Üá ÊÜáíwÓÜÆá CbfÓÜáñݤ®æ. AíñÜÖÜ ÓÜíWÜ£¿áá ÓÜáÓÜퟨܜÊæà ?
ËÊÜÄÔ.
*06011001* -3- 0601/1001
b) ‘A’ is on his trial for the murder of ‘C’. There is an evidence
to show that ‘C’ was murdered by ‘A’ and ‘B’, and that ‘B’
said – ‘‘A and I murdered ‘C’ ’’. Would the Court consider the
statement of ‘B’ against ‘A’ ? Marks : 10
"Ô'¿á®Üá° Pæãí©ÃÜáÊÜâ¨ÜPæR "G'¿áá ËaÝÃÜOæWæãÙܱÜqrÃÜáñݤ®æ. "Ô'¿á®Üá°
"G' ÊÜáñÜᤠ"¹' CŸºÃÜã ÓæàÄ Pæãí©ÃÜáÊÜâ¨ÜPæR ÓÝPÜÒ$ CÃÜáñܤ¨æ ÊÜáñÜá¤
"¹'¿áá ñܮܰ ËaÝÃÜOÝ ÓÜÊÜá¿á¨ÜÈÉ ÖæàÙÜáñݤ®æ & "G' ÊÜáñÜᤠ®Ý®Üá
Óæ à Ä "Ô'®Ü ® Ü á ° Pæ ã Çæ ÊÜ Þ w¨æ Ê Ü â '' Gí¨Ü á . "¹'®Ü Öæ à ÚPæ ¿ á®Ü á °
®Ý¿ÞÆ¿áÊÜâ "G'®Ü ËÃÜá¨Üœ ±ÜÄWÜ~ÓܟÖÜá¨æà ?
c) ‘A’ is accused of murdering ‘B’. ‘C’ is a friend of ‘A’, while
sitting in a lonely place ‘C’ asked ‘A’ whether he has killed
‘B’. ‘A’ hesitated to answer. ‘C’ said ‘‘I swear by God that I
will not tell it to anybody if you tell me the truth’’. ‘A’ confessed
to his friend ‘C’. Explain the relevancy of this statement. Marks : 10
"G' ¿áá "¹'¿á PæãÇæ BÃæãಿÞXÃÜáñݤ®æ. "G'¿áá Jíq¿ÞX
¯gì®Ü ±ÜŨæàÍܨÜÈÉ PÜáÚ£ÃÜáÊÝWÜ "G'¿á Óæ°à×ñÜ "Ô' ×àWæí¨Üá
PæàÙÜáñݤ®æ, "¹'¿á PæãÇæ¿á®Üá° ¯à®Üá ÊÜÞwÃÜáÊæ¿Þ. "" "G' EñܤÄÓÜÆá
×ígÄ¿ááñݤ®.æ BWÜ "Ô'¿áá ""¨æàÊÜÃÜ ÊæáàÇæ ±ÜÅÊÞÜ | ÊÜÞw ÖæàÙÜáñæ¤à®æ.
¯à®Üá ÓÜñÜÂÊÜ®Üá° ÖæàÚ¨ÜÃæ ®Ý®Üá ¿ÞÃÜ ŸÚ¿áá ÖæàÙÜáÊÜâ©ÆÉ '' Gí¨Üá
ÖæàÙÜáñݤ®æ. BWÜ "G'¿áá "Ô'¿á ŸÚ ñÝ®Üá "¹'¿á®Üá° PæãÇæ
ÊÜÞwÃÜáÊÜâ¨ÝX J²³PæãÙÜáÛñݤ®æ. D ÖæàÚPæ¿á ÓÜáÓÜퟨܜñæ¿á®Üá°
ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
________________

You might also like