Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gulley, Norman R PDF
Gulley, Norman R PDF
to Last-Day Events
Norman Gulley
Copyright © 1998 by
Review and Herald ® Publishing Association
International copyright secured
The author assumes full responsibility for the accuracy of all facts and quotations as cited in this book.
Unless otherwise noted, Bible texts in this book are from the Holy Bible, New International
Version. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan
Bible Publishers.
Bible texts credited to Moffatt are from: The Bible: A New Translation, by James Moffatt.
Copyright by James Moffat 1954. Used by permission of Harper & Row, Publishers, Incorporated.
Scripture quotations marked NASB are from the New American Standard Bible, © The Lockman
Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977.
Texts credited to NKJV are from the New King James Version. Copyright © 1979, 1980, 1982,
by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Bible texts credited to RSV are from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright ©
1946, 1952, 1971, by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of
Christ in the U.S.A. Used by permission.
Texts credited to RV are from The Revised Version, Oxford University Press, 1911.
PRINTED IN U.S.A.
02 01 00 99 5 4 3 2
ISBN 0-8280-1335-7
“For more than 30 years Norman Gulley has been teaching and writing about the last things.
His doctoral dissertation focused on Karl Barth’s eschatology, and Gulley brings a depth of re-
flection and richness of research to this book. Christ Is Coming, the pinnacle of his life’s work,
makes a major contribution to the Adventist Church and to Christian thought in general. What im-
presses me most about this book is Gulley’s love for Christ and the assurance that He brings as
we face the end-time.” William G. Johnsson, Ph.D.
Executive Publisher and Editor
Adventist Review
“Seventh-day Adventists for too long have anticipated the end of this world with fear and trep-
idation. Norman Gulley successfully challenges that premise. He demonstrates that ‘the real time
of trouble is for those who hate God’s people, and seek to eradicate them.’ The author has given
us a work that encompasses far more than predictions about last-day events. It summarizes the
lifework of one who has taught systematic theology for almost 40 years.”
Rose Otis
Vice President
North American Division
“At last a thorough treatment of the Adventist doctrine of eschatology with a solidly biblical
and Christ-centered focus! Eschatology is treated wholistically, within the larger perspective of
the biblical worldview and the major alternative worldviews and end-time movements. This book
will be an invaluable guide to last-day events for college and seminary students as well as pastors
and laypersons. I plan to use it as my textbook for my seminary class in biblical eschatology.”
Richard M. Davidson, Ph.D.
Old Testament Department
Andrews University Theological Seminary
J. N. Andrews Professor of Old Testament
Interpretation and Chair
“Gulley’s book provides an exciting, positive picture of the Second Coming for those whose
faith is in the Lord. It is well grounded in Scripture, written in an easy-to-grasp style, yet provides
additional material for those who wish to dig deeper. A must read for every Adventist who believes
and hopes for the soon return of our Lord.” Randall W. Younker, Ph.D.
Director, Ph.D./Th.D. programs
Andrews University Theological Seminary
Christ Is Coming! is written to give the reader step- by-step instructions on how to prepare
for the final events in the great controversy. Gulley takes complex contemporary themes and de-
velops them into a simple, concise writing style for average people.”
Oliver J. McKinney
Ministerial Association Secretary
Southern Union Conference
“If you are serious about watching and working while awaiting the parousia of our Lord,
Norm Gulley’s thoroughgoing volume will help render the journey informed and expectant. I’ll
be keeping my copy close at hand.” Mervyn A. Warren, Ph.D., D.Min.
Chairman of Religion
Oakwood College
“The book is fragrant with hope, faith, and confidence in Christ’s soon return, and I’ve
been deeply moved by it. Those who know and love Norman Gulley as a teacher will hear his
voice in every line, and if they listen carefully, they will hear Christ’s voice as well.”
Ed Christian, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of English and Bible
Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
“One of the most popular religion classes at Southern Adventist University is Last-Day Events,
taught by Norman R. Gulley. From years of experience and deep study he offers a unique textbook
that is for all members of the church.” Leo Van Dolson, Ph.D.
Adjunct Professor of Religion and
Health Evangelism
Southern Adventist University
“With the impressive thoroughness we’ve come to expect, Norm Gulley has done the Seventh-
day Adventist Church and the Christian church in general a great service in preparing a textbook
on last-day events. . . . It holds a wealth of immediately relevant information that every concerned
and committed Christian will want to read.” Warren Ashworth, Ph.D.
Professor of Religion
Pacific Union College
“This comprehensive volume is a must for all who want to hear the present heartbeat of
centrist Adventist eschatology.” Arthur N. Patrick, D.Min., Ph.D.
Visiting Associate Professor
Church History and Pastoral Ministry
La Sierra University
Acknowledgments
want to thank the Review and Herald ® Publishing Association for undertaking
I to publish this volume. I salute you for sensing the church needs a textbook/
sourcebook on last-day events. Special thanks are due Richard Coffen, vice
president for editorial; Gerald Wheeler, assistant vice president; Jeannette
Johnson, acquisitions editor; and Tim Crosby, editor-at-large. I am grateful to
these persons and to all the team who worked so well on the project. As always,
Gerald Wheeler did excellent work in editing.
I want to thank those who gave such kind and generous endorsements of this
book. Their words are an encouragement. Above all, I want to thank my Saviour
for the many ideas that came to me while looking at last-day events from His per-
spective. I have sensed His presence with me in the research and writing of this
books, and worship and adore Him for His gracious leading during the many years
of gathering and thinking through the data.
Grateful thanks to Peggy Bennett, director of libraries and her staff for obtain-
ing interlibrary loan books and articles through the McKee Library at Southern
Adventist University.
This page intentionally left blank.
8
Foreword
he heartbeat of Adventism is succinctly expressed in the words of the
T Hymn, “We have this hope which burns within our hearts, hope in the com-
ing of the Lord.”
While early Adventists eagerly grasped the prophecies of the Second
Coming, their focus centered not so much upon the doctrine per se as on Christ
Himself. It was with tears of joy and eager anticipation that they looked forward to
seeing their Saviour and Lord. That hope is still the spirit of Adventism today.
As the good news of salvation through Christ alone and His soon return is broad-
cast by satellite and shared with others by millions of Adventists around the world,
the great controversy between Christ and Satan is intensifying. Planet Earth, filled
with people for whom Christ died, hurtles through the pre-Advent time zone with
comparatively few aware that they are heading toward the end of human history. The
faster we travel, the greater our need of the Holy Spirit to help us focus on Christ in-
stead of the crisis while at the same time recognizing the hazards along the way.
Dr. Norman Gulley has provided a comprehensive, Christ-centered volume on
end-time events, movements, and scriptural teachings crucial to our understanding
and safety. Postmodern thinking, which holds opposite values to be equally true;
spirituality without the authority of Scripture; theistic evolution without 24-hour days
of creation and a weekly Sabbath; worship as entertainment; and apparitions of Mary
with supposed messages from heaven are only a few of the hazards exposed.
While Dr. Gulley wrote Christ Is Coming! first as a textbook for Seventh-day
Adventist young people, I recommend it to all of whatever age and Christian per-
suasion whose hope is the return of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Robert S. Folkenberg
This page intentionally left blank.
10
Contents
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
C HRIST I S C OMING !
tion of Seventh-day Adventist youth Perhaps here is the problem. Few will
from all over the United States and have the necessary faith. Faith in Him
other countries, studying a variety of will make the decisive, determining
majors. They are among the final gen- difference for the journey through end-
eration, yet many do not want to be part time turbulence.
of it. Something is radically wrong In this book we will look frankly at
here. And who could say that the re- the coming crisis, but not apart from the
sults would be any better if we re- present and coming Christ. As we rapidly
searched older people? move toward the third millennium, it is
To be afraid of last-day events is time to let Christ liberate us from the
human. Who wants to exchange a com- shackles of fear. Do you long to hope
paratively normal existence for what is again? Or even for the first time?
just ahead? Yet it will be our finest hour, Since 1960 college and seminary stu-
one we’ll speak about forever in eter- dents have taken my last-day events
nity, as we shall see later. It is the time class. It has been a joy to proclaim the
when Satan faces resounding defeat. He good news about final events through
knows this and is out to take over not these classes and seminars in different
only the world but Christians too! parts of the world. My conviction is that
As never before, Christians need many Christians are far too scared of
faith: a faith that keeps a steady gaze final events. But when they hear of com-
on the coming Christ beyond the crisis. ing events in their Christ-centered con-
Christ, and not the crisis, should oc- text, fear falls away. “Then you will
cupy their minds. For not so much what know the truth, and the truth will set you
is coming as who is coming should oc- free” (John 8:32). For nearly 40 years
cupy the mind. The outcome of a foot- I’ve rejoiced to see thousands of persons
ball game is not over until the fourth begin to hope again. I have written this
quarter. Satan causes havoc in final book so that you too may stop fearing
events, but Christ will have the last coming events. Satan is in the business of
word. But that’s not all. Christ will be getting Christians fixated on what is
with His people through those final coming instead of on Christ.
events. He promised, “Never will I By the way, I surveyed those stu-
leave you; never will I forsake you” dents at the end of the semester. Ninety-
(Heb. 13:5). His presence will mean six percent had lost their fear of last-day
everything to His followers. He will do events. What a dramatic change
for them what they could never do for wrought by Christ! They gained free-
themselves. Many people look at final dom to rejoice in Him and now face
events as if they have to go through final events as their privileged destiny.
them alone. No wonder they remain So can you! May God bless you and
petrified! But Christ longs that His give you freedom too. l
people look to Him. Jesus asked if Norman R. Gulley, Ph.D.
when the Son of man returns, would He Professor of Systematic Theology
find faith in the earth? (see Luke 18:8). Southern Adventist University
Preface
ookshelves bulge with last-day- This book also looks at ideas that
C HRIST I S C OMING !
Information
for the Journey
This page intentionally left blank.
28
Chapter 1
T
oday we’re in the midst of a pro-
found transition from what of what is happening, much less figure
scholars call modernity to a new out how to respond.” 2
period they label as postmoder-
nity. The human race has en- Defined
tered a new era that presents unpre- We begin with a simple fact:
cedented challenges and opportunities Postmodernity comes after modernity.
to our study of end-time events. The seventeenth-century Enlighten-
Many have attempted to describe ment, which dominated human quest
postmodernity. “A massive intellectual for knowledge and understanding for
revolution is taking place,” Diogenes 200 years, launched the intellectual pe-
Allen says, “that is perhaps as great as riod we call modernity. Scientific
that which marked off the modern world method brought multiplied technologi-
from the Middle Ages. The foundations cal benefits, but it also negatively af-
of the modern world are collapsing, and fected global ecology as well as
we are entering a postmodern world. bringing the human race to the brink of
The principles formed during the a nuclear holocaust. As a result, its ear-
Enlightenment (c. 1600-1780), which lier belief in knowledge as inherently
formed the foundations of modern men- good came to a shattering end. Thus,
tality, are crumbling.” 1 early in the twentieth century thinkers
Leith Anderson says, “We are ex- began to challenge the modern world-
periencing enormous structural change view, and it continues to be questioned.
in our country and in the world— Postmodernity is also antimodernity.
change that promises to be greater than The modern worldview included the ac-
the invention of the printing press, ceptance of humanity’s inevitable
greater than the Industrial Revolution, progress, often based on evolutionary
and greater than the rise and demise of theory. We have now come to a genera-
Communism. Our world is changing so tion that for the first time does not see
30
C HRIST I S C OMING !
any inevitable better future. The opti- new worldview defends the marginal-
mism of the Enlightenment, with its ized. Yet at the same time, as Carl F.
vaunted belief in human reason, has H. Henry notes, “religion is marginal-
given way to pessimism and meaning- ized and trivialized,” 5 and “Postmod-
lessness. It is as if the world has suddenly ernists have genuinely given up on the
awakened to a reality check. Whereas idea of absolute truth.” 6 What a para-
scientific method, reason, and universal dox—they have an absolute mission or
objectivity influenced the modern world- right (to liberate), yet without an abso-
view, postmodernity rejects scientific lute mandate or truth, which leaves
method, reason, and universal objectiv- one wondering how even liberation
ity. The collapse of a unified, rational, can be an absolute truth for them!
and meaningful worldview has thrown Modernistic philosophy shut God
the human race into a period in which out of our part of His universe. Its
each person approaches reality from his closed continuum worldview rejected
or her own particular presuppositions and any inbreaking of the supernatural
assumptions. No single worldview pro- within the normal operation of cause
vides a meaningful assessment of reality. and effect. Huston Smith suggests that
“Defining the idea of postmodernism,” the modern mind thought that “seeing
Gary Phillips writes, “is a bit like nailing further in a horizontal direction would
down Jell-O.” 3 compensate for loss of the vertical.”
But modernistic philosophy failed to
Differences Between Modernity realize that human vision on the hori-
and Postmodernity zontal plane is still confined within a
When it comes to comparing closed universe and is therefore
modernity and postmodernity, a radi- trapped in its own subjectivity. Smith
cal discontinuity overshadows the con- illustrates this vision with a line silhou-
tinuities we do find. First, let us look at etting the Himalayan range. Modernity
an example of continuity. The modern grabbed both ends and pulled it into a
antipathy to metaphysics and the tran- straight line.7
scendental continues in postmodernity. Also modernity flaunted human
“While modernism categorically de- reason as the savior of all human prob-
nies the transcendent and spends a lems. Such extreme rationalism was
great deal of time and effort attempt- not enlightened, although it was a
ing to prove that the transcendent does product of the Enlightenment. Post-
not exist,” William E. Brown says, modernists rightly question such intel-
“Postmodernism confronts the tran- lectual arrogance, but go too far by
scendent with a yawn.” 4 rejecting reason altogether.8 The solu-
Postmodernity especially champi- tion lies between the two extremes,
ons liberation causes. If we have no employing a proper use of reason under
transcendent God, then human beings the guidance of Scripture to arrive at
themselves have to become revolu- solutions. After all, the God of all truth
tionaries to bring change in their own invited humanity, “Come now, let us
strength and in their own way. The reason together” (Isa. 1:18).
31
C HRIST I S C OMING !
sional or business life. Thus worka- moral code, and personal preference
holism didn’t recede with the advent of pushed aside values. “If it feels good”
postmodernity. The effects of Creation substituted for an objective norm.
and modernity still live on in spite of Order gives way to chaos, hope to
postmodernism’s decentering theory. nihilism, and the future to the ever-
present. Reality has no goal, purpose,
3. Opposed to Any Worldview or fulfillment. Humanity has become
Unlike all prior ages, postmodernity less than human.
has no overarching worldview. Yet we Such dysfunctionality cannot sus-
cannot possibly live up to this theoreti- tain a viable human existence. We
cal position. Postmodernity is a revolt want meaning in our lives. Post-
expressed in many different ways. One moderns are desperate for meaning and
way occurs through liberation theology, a future. More than ever, they need to
a quest for political power influenced by know the good news about final events
Marxism. But even liberation theology on Planet Earth.
has a worldview, seeing God as in the
business of liberating marginalized peo- Postmodern Theory
ple. Thus the concept of liberation holds Cannot Be Lived
the center of this worldview. This is but Having already noticed that it is
one example of how a movement even impossible to actually live out some
within postmodernity does have a postmodern theories, we now take a
worldview in practice. closer look at this fact. Friedrich
Modernity had both a center and a Nietzsche (1844-1900), father of post-
worldview. Postmodernity has neither. modernism, proclaimed God as dead
Yet, paradoxically, postmodernity finds and promoted nihilism, or meaning-
itself in a shrinking world that thinks lessness. Yet he discovered meaning in
more in global terms, ranging from a social movement of his time and pro-
economy to ecology. At the very time moted it with gusto, thus demonstrat-
when philosophy seeks to throw order to ing that he could not practice his own
the winds, a global village has emerged, theory. Jean-Paul Sartre’s (1905-1980)
demanding even greater order. To this world was one of meaninglessness, a
extent, in many areas of life, a world- world without morals. Yet he couldn’t
view has been thrust upon the very rev- live up to his theory when he signed the
olution that abandoned all worldviews. Algerian Manifesto, “taking a position
as though morals have real meaning.” 9
4. Relativism A. J. Ayer suggested that only
By rejecting any system, center, or mathematico-logical truths and empiri-
worldview, the only option left to post- cal truths are meaningful. All other
modernity was relativism. But rela- statements that we cannot verify by
tivism means that every individual has sense data are “nonsense.” Thus all
a right to his or her own view. The biblical statements are meaningless.
local situation has replaced the broader Such a view immediately confines
context, situation ethics usurped the truth statements, or statements of
33
meaning, to a very narrow slice of life. from the claim that Derrida’s essential
It forces us to renounce poetry, music, position cannot be stated as others can
religion, and art. But how can anyone (or that a reader should not try to grasp
live in such a narrowly prescribed the author’s intent!). Derrida thus aban-
world? Furthermore, the theory could dons this position, just as others do,
not stand under its own test for a truth when he feels the need to replace a mis-
statement. After all, how can we possi- statement of his view with an adequate
bly test a theory of language that ac- statement of it.” 11
cepts only mathematico-logical and Stanley Fish is “one of the most in-
empirical statements by that standard? fluential literary theorists” 12 and “radi-
René Descartes (1596-1650), the cal” reader-response theorists, focusing
father of modernity, used the method on meaning in the reading community
of doubt. David Hume (1711-1776) rather than in the biblical text itself.13
took it to its ultimate conclusion, and it Reader-response is an important part of
plunged him into utter skepticism. the postmodern scene. Fish goes so far
David K. Clark said that “Hume’s phi- as to maintain that “the text as a formal
losophy left him completely in the dark entity does not exist apart from the
about what to think, whom to trust, reader’s interpretive act.” 14 In fact,
what cause to defend, or what activity reader-response theorists believe that
to pursue. Given modern requirements, readers are coauthors with the biblical
reason could not dispel his doubts. But writers, and they give to the text the
he noticed that the company of friends meaning it should have. That is, the text
put him in better spirits. So he turned to has no real meaning in and of itself.
dining and backgammon to heal his How could life operate on Fish’s
epistemological depressions. His phi- theory? It would destroy any agree-
losophy, however, proved utterly im- ment on the American Constitution, for
potent to avoid skepticism.”10 Hume example, or any other document, so
needed relief from his theory, for it that every citizen could interpret it as
simply could not be lived. he or she chose. It would put the very
Jacques Derrida claims that “all in- concept of governance in jeopardy.
terpretations are misinterpretation,” and Traffic signs would have no standard
that a text has no clear meaning. But he meaning, and driving would be haz-
jettisoned his theory once when he was ardous. Some may choose to drive on
misunderstood in a debate with John the opposite side of the road, others
Searle. “Believing that Searle’s exposi- could agree that red traffic lights indi-
tion of his position had been unfair to cate that you should drive straight
him, Derrida could not resist saying, at through the intersection and that stop
several points in his reply, that Searle signs would mean you have the right-
had misunderstood him and misstated of-way. Contracts would be impossible
his views, even adding at one point that and would bring business to a grinding
what he, Derrida, had meant should halt, for the same wording would imply
have been clear enough and obvious to different things to different people.
Searle. This is indeed a very far cry If a text has no meaning in itself,
CIC-2
34
C HRIST I S C OMING !
but only in the mind of the reader, then to the threat from modernism instead of
no language would have meaning in resisting. The modern worldview had
and of itself either. It would exist only more influence than the biblical world-
in the mind of the hearer. Life would view, and the church surrendered to it.
simply break down hopelessly on these The tragedy is now obvious as the mod-
terms, for no one could ever be sure ern worldview has itself retreated before
that he or she could communicate. that of postmodernism.
How could one order from a catalog
over the phone? How could any TV 1. Christianity’s Capitulation
station present the evening news? What to Modernism
purpose would weather reports have? Postmodernism has called mod-
What would an emergency 911 call ac- ernism into question. Yet it is the very
complish? What meaning would a doc- modernism to which the church often
tor’s diagnosis have? What would surrendered to keep its intellectual re-
university teaching accomplish? The spectability. Since the 1960s, in the
list is endless. It is simply impossible to post-Vietnam era, many people have
accept Fish’s reader-response theory turned away from the materialism of
and make sense out of life. the West to the mysticism of the East.
Some of them are seeking for what
Limits to Pluralism they sense is missing in the West.
The pluralism of postmodernity Turning to the East for fullness, they
also causes chaos. As Mortimer J. explore Hinduism and Buddhism.
Adler reminds us in his book Truth in “Those dissatisfied with secular
Religion, “a stable and peaceful society modernity most often turn to the East
cannot exist under the domination of or to the distant mythic past,” says
two or more competing governments William C. Platcher. “One reason
unless one is subordinate to the seems to be that Christianity cannot
other.”15 Adler shows that pluralism criticize our culture very effectively if
has always existed when it comes to it has already accepted many of the as-
matters of taste and is tolerable in that sumptions of that culture as the price of
context, but not in the context of truth.16 intellectual respectability.” 17
He notes that “anything that is trans- The fact is, as Stanley Grenz
cultural is clearly in the sphere of reminds us, “most major Protestant de-
truth.” Thus the pluralism endemic in nominations” “ ‘defected’ to ‘mod-
postmodernism cannot survive in prac- ernism.’ ” 18 Unsure of their own biblical
tice in certain contexts. foundation, they caved in to science and
to culture. But the collapse of mod-
Opportunities in Postmodernism ernism demonstrated the limitations of
for Truth science. Science cannot deal with ulti-
Despite all its problems, however, mate or existential meanings.
postmodernism does give opportunity “Theology need cater to our prevailing
for truth to regain what it lost to mod- styles of thought only if it wishes to,”
ernism. Too often the church capitulated says Huston Smith. “Nothing in the way
35
of evidence requires that it do so.” 19 stretching its arms and walking about in
With respect to culture, I concur with a way not possible in the cramped quar-
William C. Platcher that “Christianity ters allowed for it since the onset of
cannot criticize our culture very effec- modernity. The danger is that it may
tively if it has already accepted many of continue to pace back and forth in its all-
the assumptions of that culture as the too-familiar constricted confines, not
price of intellectual respectability.” 20 knowing that the surrounding bars have
Accommodation closely accompanies long ago rusted away.” 21
the desire for acceptance. To confine
Scripture to a cultural artifact is a case in 3. Intellectual Strength
point. Then Scripture ceases to be the of Christianity
Word of God to culture. Culture judges Diogenes Allen, in his book
Scripture instead of the reverse. Christian Belief in a Postmodern World:
The Full Wealth of Conviction, speaks
2. More Room for Religion of “a new openness for faith.” He re-
Modernism stifled religion by minds us that Christianity has been on
closing the door to the transcendent the defensive intellectually during mod-
with its rejection of metaphysics. It ernism. During that period many have
confined the parameters of possible declared that the post-Christian age has
thought and study to a closed contin- dawned, “on the basis of physics, biol-
uum of cause and effect, so that it in ogy, philosophy, psychology, sociology,
effect removed God from the realm of and anthropology.” 22
human history. Science limited reality We are now in an age when philos-
to the observable, so that the religious ophy and science, once used to attack
dimension of human experience could Christianity, now find themselves
occupy only an interior substitute for under siege. During the reign of mod-
objective reality. Now the collapse of ernism, Christianity came under severe
this modern worldview has radically attack for the first time. This was a re-
questioned such strictures. volt against the authority found in
“In a way that has never been possi- church and Scripture. Human beings
ble in modernity, one can find philo- became their own authority, and
sophical or rational space for ‘giving an human reason ruled supreme. The his-
account for the hope that is in you,’ ” torical-critical methods of biblical
Don R. Stiver comments. “In other study did their devastating work on the
words, there is no philosophical hin- biblical documents. Evolutionary the-
drance that a priori calls such a response ory radically called into question the
into question. And given the importance Genesis account of Creation, and geol-
of reason in modernity, this renewed ogy doubted the universal Flood story.
sense of the rationality of religion opens Human reason elevated itself above di-
up a new social and cultural space for vine revelation, thus bringing God’s
religion. In other words, if the opportu- Word captive to humanity. But this
nity can be seized, postmodernity al- worldview is now collapsing.
lows conceptual space for religion’s As Allen notes: “No longer can