This document summarizes a study on applying topological structural optimization in the design of an aircraft prototype for the AeroDesign competition. The study aims to compare traditional design methods using von Mises theory with topological optimization methods using common industry software. Topological optimization was applied to the design of an aircraft for the competition. The results from both methods converged on a layout with optimized material distribution according to the imposed requirements, providing a significant mass reduction for this type of aircraft structure.
This document summarizes a study on applying topological structural optimization in the design of an aircraft prototype for the AeroDesign competition. The study aims to compare traditional design methods using von Mises theory with topological optimization methods using common industry software. Topological optimization was applied to the design of an aircraft for the competition. The results from both methods converged on a layout with optimized material distribution according to the imposed requirements, providing a significant mass reduction for this type of aircraft structure.
This document summarizes a study on applying topological structural optimization in the design of an aircraft prototype for the AeroDesign competition. The study aims to compare traditional design methods using von Mises theory with topological optimization methods using common industry software. Topological optimization was applied to the design of an aircraft for the competition. The results from both methods converged on a layout with optimized material distribution according to the imposed requirements, providing a significant mass reduction for this type of aircraft structure.
Study of the application of Topological Structural
Optimization in the design of an AeroDesign
prototype Kalyude Diógenes de Sousa1, Mayla Alencar Medeiros2, Ramsés Otto Cunha Lima1, Alison Caio Dantas Pereira1 1 Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-árido, 2Universidade Federal Rural do Semi- árido (Centro de Engenharias)
e-mail: kalyude_13@hotmail.com
A major challenge in the aerospace industry is related to the development of
reliable, efficient, lightweight structures, combined with the least development time possible. Aerospace structures are usually complex and composed of combinations of different structural elements, making it impracticable to describe them with mathematical equations separately. With the advent of high performance computing it was possible to develop methods for structural optimization. Among them, the Topological Optimization Method (TO) consists of the optimal material distribution within a design domain and is usually employed with the aim of maximizing structural rigidity or minimizing the mass of the element. Also in the aerospace context, the annual AeroDesign Competition, developed by SAE BRASIL, in which the greatest challenge is to develop a radio controlled aircraft with the aiming to ensure its structural efficiency, in other words, to design, construct and test a light aircraft able to carry the greatest amount of load as possible, the correct structural dimensioning becomes essential. Therefore, this research aims to do a comparative study of the design for the sizign of the components of an aircraft, aiming to mass reduction, using both the conventional method through the Von Mises Theory and the Topological Optimization Method with the aid of commonly used software in the industry. An aircraft destined to the AeroDesign competition was selected as object of study, in which the TO Method was applied. The study was performed numerically, considering homogeneous materials dependent on the materials relative density by means of the SIMP (Solid Isotropic Material with Penalty) procedure. A finite element method was also applied using Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) techniques. The results for both procedures converged to a layout with material well distributed according to the requests that were imposed, providing a considerable mass reduction for these types of structures.