Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International JOURNAL
Journal of Civil Engineering and OF CIVIL(IJCIET),
Technology ENGINEERING AND(Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6308
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), VolumeTECHNOLOGY (IJCIET)
6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
ABSTRACT
Global warming has emerged today as life-threatening issue for the world. As concrete is one
the most consumed material after water on the earth for infrastructure & construction industries, a
commendable contribution cam be made by optimizing the use of cement and natural resources in
concrete manufacturing. Geopolymer concrete is one of the major developments in recent years
leading to utilization of fly ash in large quantities and thus reducing cement consumption and
ultimately reducing emission of CO2 in order of one tonne per a tonne of cement. Mechanical
&Durability properties of concrete structure is another important parameter affecting the
sustainability of concrete technology in addition to minimizing use of virgin material. Experimental
investigation has been taken up on low calcium fly ash based Geopolymer concrete having three
different molar concentration of activator liquids along with different percentage of Nano silica
addition. The investigations have been done by observing the compressive strength, % weight loss
and % loss of compressive strength. Nano materials have many advantages due to its surface area.
This paper presents the effect of addition of different proportion of Nano silica in the low calcium fly
ash based Geopolymer concrete.
Keywords: Alkaline Solution, Compressive Strength, Durability, Fly Ash, Geopolymer Concrete,
Molarity, Nano Silica
135
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
1. INTRODUCTION
Concrete is one of the most widely used construction material. Ordinary Portland cement is
conventionally used as primary binder to produce concrete. The environmental issue associated with
the production of OPC is well known.
known The climate change due to global warming has become a
major concern. This all brings up a very new question: Is therethere a cleaner, most efficient, more
reliable and even stronger substitute to the concrete that is currently used? The answer is
Geopolymer concrete. Geopolymer technology shows considerable promise for application in
concrete industry as an alternative binder to the Portland cement. Geopolymer concrete is concrete
which does not utilize any Portland cement in its production. It is cement less concrete. It is
manufactured using source materials that are rich in silica and alumina. Low calcium (ASTM Class
F) fly ash is preferred as a source material than high calcium (ASTM Class C) fly ash. The
development of Geopolymer concrete can provide a solution to produce greener concrete for
sustainable development. It is a highly environment friendly concrete.
c Figure 1 shows ingredient of
Geopolymer concrete
Nano Material concrete is new generation concrete formed of materials of the grain size of
Nano scale and they are Very fine in nature. Nano Materials significantly decreased the size and
amount of CH crystals and the early age strength of hardened cement paste is increased. Among
various manufactured Nano particles Nano silica (NS) has recently been introduced as an advanced
pozzolan to improve the microstructure
ostructure and stability of cement-based
cement based system.The
system basic concept
behind using Nano Material which is having large surface area is to improve compressive strength at
early ages, improved hydration characteristics and reduced porosity and water absorption whenw
compared with conventional cementitious material.
2. OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this study is to analyze the effect of NS on Geopolymer concrete. The
main parameters observed are compressive strength and durability.
136
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
3. EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY
3.1Materials
3.1.1 Fly ash
In the experimental study, low-calcium class F type fly ash is used as shown in Figure
2.Class F fly ash provides good pozzolanic activity and it contains less than 10% of lime (CaO).
Following Table 1 provides chemical composition of fly ash used in the present study.
3.1.2 Aggregates
Coarse aggregates of sizes 20mm and 10mm and fine aggregate taken from a local supplier
are used in the present study and they have the properties as given in Table 2.
3.1.3Alkaline liquid
Alkaline solution play most important role in geopolymerization process. In the present
experimental work, a combination of sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH)
solution with molarities 8M, 12M and 16M was chosen. The sodium hydroxide solution was
prepared in the laboratory by dissolving sodium hydroxide pellets in water. The sodium silicate and
137
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
sodium hydroxide solution were mixed together at least one day prior to use because at the time of
mixing of Na2SiO3 with NaOH solution it generates a huge amount of heat due to polymerization
process.
138
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
From the different trial mixes, this concrete mix design is been adopted for experimental purpose.
• Sodium hydroxide solution to sodium silicate ratio fixed as 2.5.
• Curing was carried in oven, curing at 60°C for 24 hrs.
• Water to Geopolymer solid ratios (W/GPS) are 0.27, 0.26 and 0.25 for mixes having molar
concentration 8M, 12M and 16M respectively.
139
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
Alkaline
Liquid/ fly Fine Coarse Chem.
Mix Fly ash NaOH Na2SiO3 Water
ash Aggregates Aggregates Admix.
G30 0.45 380.689 48.945 122.364 554.4 776.16 518.64 38.0689 3.80
4. EXPERIMENT RESULTS
It is observed that compressive strength increases with increase in percentage of NS but there
is no significant change observed in the compressive strength for 12 M and 16 M as in fig. 5.
4.2 Durability
In durability test all concrete cubes were cured for a 28 days and later cubes were immersed
in sodium chloride solution having 3.5% Nacl(Sea
Nacl Water) for 28 and 56 days. The % weight loss and
% loss of compressive strength were analyzed.
140
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
Fig. 6: % Weight loss for 28 days Fig. 7: % Weight loss for 56 days
The percentage weight loss majorly decreases with increase in molarity but negligible
decrease with increase in percentage of NS. The more percentage weight loss was
wa observed for 8M
compared to 12M & 16M as in fig. 6 & 7.
Fig.8: % loss of compressive strength 28 days Fig.9: % loss of compressive strength for 56 days
he percentage loss of compressive strength for 28 & 56 days from which it is observed that
The
the percentage loss of compressive strength decreases with increase in molar concentration and
negligible decreased with increase in percentage of NS as in fig 8 & 9.. The more percentage loss of
compressive strength was observed for 8M compared with 12M & 16M. 16M
5. RESULT ANALYSIS
141
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
4) Molar concentration of sodium hydroxide solution, during lab investigation, 16M NaOH
solution is more risky to handle than 12M solution and also the chances of solidification of
alkaline activator are more with 16M solution than 12M. Hence 12M NaOH solutions
aregenerally recommended for development of Geopolymer concrete.
5) The strength of Geopolymer concrete made with 12M concentration is slightly less than that of
16M concentration.
6) In durability test, Loss of weight due to chloride effect is decreased with increase in molarity
and also minor decrease with increase in percent in percentage of nano silica.
7) There is no damage to the surface of test specimens after exposure to sodium chloride up to 56
days.
8) Heat cured Geopolymer concrete has an excellent resistance to chloride attack. This proves
Geopolymer concrete can be used in sea water area.
9) Nano silica shows impact on compressive strength and durability properties of Geopolymer
concrete.
6. CONCLUSION
With the elimination of the use of Portland cement, the emission of CO2 has been greatly
reduced which results in the reduction of Environmental pollution. The reduced CO2 emissions of
GPC make them a good alternative to OPC. Geopolymer concrete is more environments friendly; it
has the potential to replace ordinary Portland cement concrete and due to high early strength it shall
be effectively used in the precast industries. Due to use of the industrial waste, Geopolymer concrete
is an economical product and it also affects the cost of Geopolymer concrete. Addition of
supplementary materials like Nano silica can enhance the properties of GPC.
7. REFERENCES
Journal Papers
1. Ammar Motorwala, Vineet Shah, RavishankarKammula, PraveenaNannapaneni, Prof. D.B.
Raijiwala, Alkali Activated Fly –ash Based Geopolymer Concrete”, International Journal of
Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(1), 2013, 159-166.
2. A.Maria Rajesh, M.Adams Joe, Roy Mammen, Study of the Strength Geopolymer Concrete
with Alkaline Solution of Varying Molarity, IOSR Journal of Engineering, 4(6), 2014, 19-24.
3. C.D. Budh and N.R. Warhade, Effect of Molarity on Compressive Strength of Geopolymer
Mortar, International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(1), 2014, 83-86.
4. Chandan Kumar, Krishna Murari, C.R.Sharma, Strength Characteristics of Low Calcium Fly
Ash Based Geopolmer Concrete, IOSR Journal of Engineering, 04(05), 2014, 07-17.
5. D. Adak, M. Sarkar, S. Mandal, Effect of Nano silica on Strength and durability of fly ash
based geopolymer mortar, Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 453-459.
6. DeepaBalakrishnan, Thomas John V., Job Thomas, Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer
concrete, American Journal of Engineering Research, 2, 2013, 21-25.
7. Kolli.Ramujee and Dr.M.Potharaju, Development of Mix Design for Low Calcium Based
Geopolymer Concrete in Ordinary, Standard and High Strength Grades, 2013, 29-34.
8. Lekshmichandran,Vaisakh G, Anju Viswan, Experimental Investigation On the Strength Of
Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete, International Journal of Engineering Research and
Application, 2014, 55-58.
9. M.F. Nuruddin, A.Kusbiantoro, S.Qazi, M.S. Darmawan, N.A. Husin, Development of
Geopolymer Concrete with Different Curing Conditions, The Journal for Technology and
Science, 22(1), 2011, 24-28.
142
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 5, May (2015), pp. 135-143 © IAEME
10. Mr. K. Madhan Gopal, Mr. B. Naga Kiran, Investigation on Behaviour of Fly Ash Based
Geopolymer Concrete in Acidic Environment, International Journal of Modern Engineering
Research, 3(1), 2013, 580-586.
11. Neetu Singh, Sameer Vyas, R.P.Pathak, Pankaj Sharma, N.V.Mahure, S.L.Gupta, Effect of
Aggressive Chemical Environment on Durability of Green Geopolymer Concrete,
Interanational Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 3(4), 2013, 277-284.
12. Niragidave, VaishaliSahu, Experimental Evaluation of Low Calcium Fly Ash Based
Geopolymer Concrete, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 4(12),
2012, 4805-4808.
13. Prof.M.A.Bhosale, Prof.N.N.Shinde, Geopolymer Concrete by Using Fly Ash in
Construction, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 1(3), 2012, 25-30.
14. Raijiwala D.B., Patil H.S., Sankalp, High Performance Green Concrete, Civil Engineering
and Architecture, 1(1), 2013, 1-6.
15. SatputeManesh B., WakchaureMadhukar R., PatankarSubhas V. Effect of Duration and
Temperature of Curing on Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete, Interanational
Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 1(5), 2012, 152-155.
16. Shankar H. Sanni, Dr. R.B. Khadiranaikar, Performance of Geopolymer Concrete Under
Various Curing Conditions, International Journal of Science Research, 2(3), 2013, 178-180.
17. S. Jaydeep, B.J.Chakravarthy, Study On Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete Using
Admixtures, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 4(10), 2013, 4614-
4617.
18. S. Kumaravel, Development of various effect of nominal strength Geopolymer concrete,
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 7(1), 2014, 116-119.
19. Sourav Kr. Das, Amarendra Kr. Mohapatra and A.K. Rath, Geopolymer Concrete- Green
Concrete for the Future- A Review, International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(1),
2014, 21-28.
20. S. Srinivasan, A.Karthik, DR.S.Nagan, An Investigation on Flexural Behaviour of Glass
Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beams, International Journal of Engineering
Sciences & Research Technology, 3(4), 2014, 1963-1968.
21. Subhas V. Patankar, Sanjay S. Jamkar, Yuwaraj M. Ghugal, Effect of Water-to-Geopolymer
Binder Ratio On the Production of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete, International
Journal of Advanced Technology in Civil Engineering, 2(1), 2013, 79-83.
22. Subhas V. Patankar, Yuvraj M. Ghugal, and Sanjay S. Jamkar, Effect of Concentration of
Sodium Hydroxide and Degree of Heat Curing on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar, Indian
Journal of Materials Science, 2014, 1-6.
23. S.V. Joshi, Dr. M.S. Kadu, Effect of Delayed Oven Dried Curing on Compressive Strength of
Geopolymer Concrete, Innovative Approaches in Civil Engineering, Vol-3, 2014, 130-132.
24. S.V. Joshi and M.S. Kadu, Role of Alkaline Activator in Development of Eco-friendly Fly
Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete, International Journal of Environmental Science and
Development, 3(5), 2012, 417-421.
25. V. Bhikshma, M. Koti Reddy and T. Srinivas Rao, An Experimental Investigation on
Properties of Geopolymer Concrete (No Cement Concrete), Asian Journal of Civil
Engineering, 13(6), 2012, 841-853.
26. Dr. V.Bhaskar Desai and A.Sathyam, “Basic Properties of Artificial Lightweight Aggregate
by Using Industrial by Product (Fly Ash)” International Journal of Civil Engineering &
Technology (IJCIET), Volume 5, Issue 6, 2014, pp. 65 - 72, ISSN Print: 0976 – 6308, ISSN
Online: 0976 – 6316.
143