Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marshall Goebel2017 PDF
Marshall Goebel2017 PDF
RESEARCH ARTICLE
the mattress at all times (sitting or standing not permitted), and the 12° Subjects were weighed in standardized dedicated clothing, the weight
HDT angle was maintained. Each subject was accommodated in a of which was subtracted from the total weight for accurate subject
single-person room, and the daily schedule consisted of 6:30 AM weight. Body temperature was also measured in the ear three times,
wake up and 10:30 PM lights out. Light intensity (100 lux) and with the mean used for statistical analysis. Urine output was collected
spectrum, enriched in green (~540 nm) wavelengths to entrain the and pooled every 24 h for assessment. Furthermore, venous blood
circadian system, were standardized and periodically verified with an samples were taken at baseline (morning of HDT day, before entry
external spectral irradiance meter in the subject bedrooms and mea- into 12° HDT position) and after 4.5 h HDT, 24 h HDT, and 28.5 h
surement rooms. To track their activity during the nighttime as an HDT ⫹ 3% CO2. Various parameters were measured including white
indicator of sleep quality, the subjects wore an Actiwatch activity blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes (LYM), monocytes (MON), neutro-
monitor (Actigraph, Pensacola, FL) on the wrist of the nondominant phils (NEU), eosinophils (EOS), basophils (BAS), red blood cells
arm. (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular
Nutrition. All subjects received a strictly controlled diet, for the volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpus-
entire duration of the study, tailored to individual resting metabolic cular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), red blood cell distribution
rates (RMRs; Table 2). The RMR was estimated based on body width (RDW), platelet count (PLT), and mean platelet volume (MPV).
weight and age from equations provided in the Human Energy The aforementioned measured parameters are presented as standard
Requirements Report by the United States Food and Agriculture health indicators, along with core environmental data.
Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations University To fully understand the physiological effects of HDT with and
Expert Consultation (21). Then, for each individual, the daily energy
without increased ambient CO2, a comprehensive set of cerebral,
intake during stationary phases was set to 1.5 ⫻ RMR (corresponding
ocular, and cardiopulmonary measurements were performed on a
to light intensity daily physical activities), whereas during HDT the
carefully timed and adhered-to schedule. This ensured that measure-
daily energy content was set to 1.3 ⫻ RMR (corresponding to the
ments with particular devices or assays were taken at the same time of
energy need of a sedentary adult). The carbohydrate content of the diet
was set to 50 –55% and dietary fat intake was set to 30 –35%, in line day across conditions for each subject as well as within 3 h of the
with international bed rest standards (15). The selected food items other subjects within the campaign group. Deviations from the
corresponded to a standard German diet. Fluid intake was regulated planned schedule were minimal (no more than 15 min), allowing for
and set to 42 ml·kg body wt⫺1·day⫺1 and, apart from the fluid portion cross-comparison and multimodality investigation. All data acquisi-
contained in the meals, was provided in the form of water and diluted tion systems were time-synchronized to a master clock which was
apple juice. Intake of caffeine, alcohol, and chocolate was prohibited. displayed prominently, and the resulting individual data sets were
All meals were planned and supervised by registered dieticians and merged into a master data table in Stata v14. Results from the various
prepared in the : envihab metabolic kitchen. Nutrient content was physiological and anatomical measurements will be published in a
calculated using PRODI software (Kluthe Prodi 6.3 expert; Nutri- series of discrete papers.
science, Germany). Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out in IBM
Measurements. As part of the standardized bed rest protocol, SPSS Statistics Version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY). ANOVA and linear
general health indicators including three blood pressure and heart rate mixed effect models were constructed with time and atmosphere as
readings (Intellivue MMS X2; Philips, Best, The Netherlands) were main effects allowing for a time-atmosphere interaction, and subject
obtained every morning in the fasted state immediately following the as a random effect. When a main effect was found to be significant,
scheduled wake-up at 6:30 AM. In addition, body mass was also Bonferroni post hoc analyses were implemented (adjusted for multiple
assessed daily in bed with a bed scale (DVM 5703; Sartorius, comparisons by dividing ␣ by the number of comparisons) to deter-
Goettingen, Germany) following the first urine void of the day. mine differences between time points and/or atmospheric conditions.
All data are presented as means ⫾ SD. The level for statistical P ⫽ 0.6), systolic blood pressure (P ⫽ 0.5, P ⫽ 0.6), diastolic
significance was set to ␣ ⫽ 0.05, and  was set to 0.2. blood pressure (P ⫽ 0.5, P ⫽ 0.8), or heart rate (P ⫽ 0.2, P ⫽
0.4). Body temperature, however, was found to have a main
RESULTS effect of atmosphere (P ⫽ 0.02) but not time (P ⫽ 0.6). Body
weight showed a significant main effect of time (P ⫽ 0.001)
Environmental conditions. Environmental parameters in the
but not atmosphere (P ⫽ 0.97), with a slight decrease in mean
bedrooms, measurement rooms, and common spaces of the :
body weight after 19.5 h HDT (P ⫽ 0.02).
envihab bed rest facility were recorded every minute, 24 h/day
Blood parameters. As shown in Table 4, significant main
(Fig. 2). On days with ambient atmosphere (baseline data
effects of time were found for WBC (P ⬍ 0.001), LYM (P ⬍
collection days and 12° HDT with ambient air), the mean CO2
0.001), MON (P ⫽ 0.003), NEU (P ⬍ 0.001), EOS (P ⬍
level was 0.04 ⫾ 0.01%, whereas on days with increased
0.001), HGB (P ⫽ 0.001), HCT (P ⬍ 0.001), RBC (P ⫽
ambient CO2 (intervention day 12° HDT with 0.5% CO2), the
0.004), MCH (P ⫽ 0.003), and RDW (P ⫽ 0.035). Significant
mean CO2 level was 0.48 ⫾ 0.02%.
main effects of atmosphere were found for BAS (P ⫽ 0.036),
General health indicators. General health indicator data are
MCV (P ⫽ 0.045), PLT (P ⫽ 0.002), and MPV (P ⬍ 0.001).
presented in Table 3. Twenty-four-hour pooled urine volume
No main effects were found for MCHC.
had a significant main effect of time (P ⫽ 0.005) and was
found to increase from 2,533.8 ⫾ 324.7 ml at baseline data DISCUSSION
collection to 3,038.5 ⫾ 506.1 ml during 12° HDT with ambient
air (P ⫽ 0.04) and from 2,671.8 ⫾ 704.3 ml at baseline data The SPACECOT study demonstrates the feasibility of an
collection to 3,185.2 ⫾ 325.8 ml during 12° HDT ⫹ 0.5% CO2 innovative approach to studying the effects of headward fluid
(P ⫽ 0.03). However, there was no significant main effect of shifting and elevated ambient CO2 on cerebral and ocular
atmosphere (P ⫽ 0.4). No significant main effects of time or anatomy and physiology. The implemented approach utilized a
atmosphere were found for mean arterial pressure (P ⫽ 0.97, steeper HDT angle (12°) than what is typically used (6°), both
0.5
0.4
0.1
HDT ⫹ 0.5% CO2 5.67 ⫾ 1.37 6.67 ⫾ 1.63 7 ⫾ 1.79* 8.17 ⫾ 2.32‡
HDT ⫹ amb 6 ⫾ 1.26 7.17 ⫾ 2.23 7.17 ⫾ 1.47 7.83 ⫾ 2.14‡
Lymphocytes, %
HDT ⫹ 0.5% CO2 42.17 ⫾ 4.79 35.17 ⫾ 5.15‡ 33 ⫾ 4.29‡ 30.17 ⫾ 5.64‡
HDT ⫹ amb 42.83 ⫾ 3.43 36 ⫾ 5.9‡ 32.33 ⫾ 5.16‡ 31.17 ⫾ 6.65‡
Monocytes, %
HDT ⫹ 0.5% CO2 10.67 ⫾ 1.63 10.5 ⫾ 1.05 11.33 ⫾ 1.86 11.67 ⫾ 1.37
HDT ⫹ amb 11.17 ⫾ 1.33 10 ⫾ 1.79 10.83 ⫾ 0.98 10.83 ⫾ 1.17
Neutrophils, %
HDT ⫹ 0.5% CO2 43.67 ⫾ 5.13 51.67 ⫾ 5.32‡ 53.5 ⫾ 4.76‡ 55.83 ⫾ 6.82‡
HDT ⫹ amb 42.83 ⫾ 4.12 51.5 ⫾ 5.96‡ 54.33 ⫾ 5.24‡ 55.33 ⫾ 6.22‡
Basophils, %
HDT ⫹ 0.5% CO2 0⫾0 0⫾0 0.17 ⫾ 0.41 0.33 ⫾ 0.52
HDT ⫹ amb 0.5 ⫾ 0.55 0.17 ⫾ 0.41 0.17 ⫾ 0.41 0.17 ⫾ 0.41
Eosinophils, %
HDT ⫹ 0.5% CO2 2.83 ⫾ 0.98 2.17 ⫾ 0.75 2 ⫾ 0.89 1.83 ⫾ 0.75*
went 6° HDT for 42 days and polymorphonuclear cells in- Nutritional intake was highly standardized and regulated in
creased during HDT, whereas the T-lymphocytes and mono- the presented study and is important to take into consideration
cytes did not change (12). when interpreting results of other physiological systems, be-
In contrast to the slight elevation of WBC count, the vital cause diet may affect multiple organ system function including
signs including blood pressure did not significantly change cardiovascular and cerebrovascular parameters. Notably, so-
from baseline to the late HDT time point (Table 3) in either the dium content was set to ~4 g/day in this study, standard for bed
HDT alone or HDT with 0.5% CO2 condition. This is consis- rest studies, and is an important factor to monitor closely,
tent with findings from previous bed rest studies (10, 13), and because sodium intake could have effects on blood pressure
there may be several explanations for this. First, the subjects and fluid retention. Whether sodium intake has an effect on
may have adapted to the stress of the environment and, there- cerebral and ocular changes in spaceflight is unknown; however,
fore, the blood pressure remained unchanged from baseline. if vascular fluid content and thus volume increases, this may also
Second, a decrease in plasma volume related to HDT-induced have effects on the cerebrovascular system. Given that ICP is
diuresis may have occurred, which would lower the central related to cerebral venous outflow and central venous pressure, it
venous pressure and preload, thus reducing cardiac output is possible that a high sodium diet may contribute to a higher
given a stable heart rate. circulating venous volume and affect ICP.
The unique platform of the SPACECOT study with a steeper episode of emesis, and one subject was unable to urinate in the
degree of HDT as well as atmospheric conditioning is consid- 12° HDT position during the first campaign and had to have a
ered to be more challenging for subjects than standard HDT urinary catheter inserted. In the subsequent campaign, this
bed rest studies, and, therefore, new procedures were imple- subject was briefly moved to the 0° position for urination. Data
mented to ensure both subject comfortability and successful were examined to determine whether measurements obtained
completion of the study. First, we selected several subjects from this one subject were outside of one standard deviation of
with prior bed rest experience who were mentally prepared for the group mean, and this was determined not to be the case.
the bed rest experience. Furthermore, we extended subject With this one exception, in general, the subjects were able to
recruitment to include brief HDT exposure for both mental and urinate and defecate at the 12° HDT position without difficulty.
physical familiarization with the demands of bed rest at a There are important differences between real microgravity
steeper HDT angle, as well as an MRI session to exclude and HDT bed rest that must be taken into account when
unknown anxiety disorders or claustrophobia. In addition, a interpreting results, most notably, the presence of gravitational
full day of familiarization was added before the first day of vectors in the latter. Unlike in microgravity where all hydro-
baseline data collection, to introduce the subjects to all of the static gradients are abolished, a small foot-to-head vector is
study measurement techniques and the busy schedule. This is created during HDT to create a headward fluid shift similar to
thought to have alleviated some of the stress associated with what may be experienced in microgravity. In addition, a Gx
the complex procedures of the study, allowing subjects to be (chest to back) gravitational vector is present in HDT bed rest,
more relaxed and comfortable during actual baseline measure- which may result in different cardiovascular and pulmonary
ments the following day. Furthermore, pillows are normally physiological responses compared to microgravity. Further-