Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Discuss the ways in which the counsellor’s qualities AND the counselling
associated with this phenomenon (Murphy & Joseph, 2016). Discovered by Carl Rogers, (1957)
this concept elucidates itself as a non-authoritative approach that allows clients to take the
initiative during the therapist-client discussion, with the expectation that they will discover their
Despite this conception, mainly focusing on the clients self-growth (Hills, 2007, p. 262)
there are essential attributes in which the counsellor must portray for the clients self-growth to
occur, and the person-centred therapy is a success (Cooper, 2019; Rogers, 1957). These
attributes, otherwise known as the three core conditions are; unconditional positive regard,
empathetic understanding and congruence, in which the counsellor has to make known to the
These three conditions are perceived as very useful separately, as (Farber, 2007, p. 289)
concluded that each element merged has no definite conclusion to its sufficiency in producing a
positive therapeutic change. However, others have counter-argued this opinion by stating each
condition is inter-linked and cause a therapeutic change when consolidated (Ismail & Tekke,
2015, p. 32).
session and sustained throughout the therapy session (Horvath, Del Re, Fluckiger, & Symonds,
2011, p. 13). Even so, this is debatable as it depends on the type of therapy or clients problem
3
(Blanchard & Farber, 2016, p. 93). Generally, each condition and therapeutic alliance have their
understanding and how they are to be demonstrated by the counsellor to the client (Hills, 2007,
p. 261; Lapworth & Sill, 2011, p. 22). Their effectiveness is evident; however, disapproved by
some researchers (Cooper, 2019), this essay will discuss the following (Campbel, 2017, p. 5).
congruence, promote personality change in the client (Cooper et al., 2013). They are each very
critical and need to be present and communicated in the counselling relationship. Their
importance is essential because it sets a trust, respect and non-judgmental basis that is
authority or superiority but, a presentation of their real and accessible self to the client and the
client sees it as them being honest and transparent (Eager, 2010, p. 109; Kolden, 2018, p. 1).
Kolden et al., (2011) suggest this factor being a two-way stream, in which the therapist mirrors
authenticity and skill of mindfulness also; a communication of his or her experiences with the
client in a compelling way to the client's situation. It is therefore, the personal characteristics of
the therapist, as well "as an experiential quality of the therapy relationship (interpersonal)"
For this concept to bring about a successful outcome in therapy, the therapist must have
authentic communication with the client, which is done by sharing their feelings and experiences
with the client (Kolden et al., 2011, p. 3-9). As this happens, the client feels honesty and
transparency from the therapist, and a probing to reciprocate the same action is instilled (Tolan &
4
Cameron, 2011, p. 48). The common misconception is that authentic communication can occur
without showing any negative attributes (Bourne, 2018, p. 6-8); however, this is impossible
because the therapist is a human (Kolog & Montero, 2018 p. 1). Due to external/internal factors,
the therapist can leak a negative aura such as subtle irritancy due to the client's abrupt behaviour
and that can cause a rupture in the relationship between client-counsellor (Tolan & Cameron,
2011, p. 49). Nonetheless, when the therapist self-disclosure is done appropriately, the
(Campbel, 2018, p. 7). Wickman & Campbell, (2003) describes this an everyday conversation
between the client-therapist, that lets the therapist covey slightly risky ideas or an abate
recommendation to an idea supposed by the client that might be conversationally awkward (p.
81). In a therapeutic example, the client might admit that they do not feel a connection between
themselves and the therapist. The therapist then responds with a meta-statement that is
sometimes a form of praise such as; the counsellor feels proud that the client could articulate
such feelings to them (Campbel, 2018, p. 8). Thus, the client feels acceptance from that response
and therefore creating a safe space for them to open up about what they think. However, Tolan &
Cameron (2011) make emphasis that praise can be a threat due to the client's self-concept
because of their past experience of always receiving blame (p. 75). Therefore this factor has to be
Secondly, unconditional positive regard (UPR) is when the therapist conveys deep care
and acceptance with no boundaries/judgements toward the client (Tolan, 2012; Farber & Doolin,
2011). Carl Rogers states that the counsellor when showing UPR, should be willing to allow the
5
client to feel what they are feeling in the here and now (Hazel, 2017, p. 171; Gallagher, 2017).
Concerning a positive outcome in therapy, there are specific factors this attribute should entail,
Warmth focuses on the therapist human and linguistic communication (Farber, Suziki &
Lynch, 2018). Essentially, the therapist has a repertoire and unique way of showing warmth
(Malta, 2016), for example, when using the skill of normalising (McIntosh, 2016). With
normalising in the context of warmth, the therapist lets the client know that their emotional
feelings are a normal response to their situation and period of life. By doing this, the client feels
better, and an enablement to respond constructively to their situation is created (Schreiner, 2017,
para. 5) Additionally, there is the creation of relational depth which is the therapists engagement
with the client that keeps a consistent level acceptance from the therapist to the client (Malta,
However, not all clients perceive warmth as positive, and that can cause immediate
distrust in the counselling relationship, therefore, keeping the process of growth and change at a
halt (Mearn et al., 2013, p. 89). Nonetheless, this can be fixed if the therapist has self
unconditional positive regard (Ismail & Tekke, 2015, p. 30-31) because when the therapist is
able to accept corrections the client gives them perhaps about the way they show warmth (Jayne,
2013), the therapeutic alliance is strengthened and therefore a positive outcome in therapy is
(Rogers,1957, p. 91; Clark, 2010). Empathy is different from sympathy: for with sympathy, the
therapist would feel for the client, for example, pity (Scheler, 2017). Still, with empathy, the
6
therapist feels with the client (Aragno, 2008). The therapist is not the client, so they cannot
understand how the client is feeling (Lapworth & Sill, 2011, p. 22; Clark, 2004). Nevertheless,
they can try to understand how and why the client is feeling the emotions they have. Angus &
Kang (2007) states that with empathy the therapist acknowledges that the client is feeling what
they are feeling through their observation, and attempt to resonate with their feelings & thoughts
(p. 372)
For a successful outcome, empathy must be channelled by the therapist being accurately
attuned with the client and perceive the "client's internal, implicit frame of reference, in terms of
both conceptual and emotional meanings" (Angus and Kang, 2007, p. 372). With empathetic
attunement comes empathetic listening in which the therapist listens to the client about how they
are feeling (Bodie, 2011), therefore, creating a safe space for the clients to reveal their story
(Floyd, 2015). By the therapist doing this, the client can step back, and reflect on the feelings
they have towards their situation and then re-evaluate and try to find new possibilities to
eliminate their problematic thinking (Drollinger, Comes & Warrington, 2006, p. 162;
Shrivastava, 2014, p. 4). In return enablement for change, growth and a willingness to take on
the world outside the counsellor's room is formed (Angus & Kand, 2007, p. 373).
In spite of this attribute been sufficient for client change, some research suggests that it
helps bring about a successful outcome but not all the time (Watson, 2016). Campbel, (2017)
states that there have been inconsistent research results and different conclusions regarding the
function of empathy in psychotherapy. Also, empathy would most likely not be sufficient for an
individual with severe problems (Daun & Hill, 1996; Balkin, 2014; Cooper, 2010). Even so,
7
Elliott et al., (2011) emphasise that empathy is a strong predictor for a successful outcome (p.
43).
Within each condition, the therapeutic alliance is incorporated in order for rapport to
build during the session. Therapeutic alliance is familiarized as an “agreement on the goals and
tasks of therapy in the context of a positive affective bond between patient and therapist”
(Falkenström, Granstrom & Holmqvist, 2013, p. 3). To actualize the therapeutic alliance, client
attachment is necessary as it determines when the psychological contract or bond will be created
(Smith, 2010). The development of a good alliance is to be established at the beginning stages of
therapy due to trust built through communication at the first interaction between client-therapist
However, the strength of the alliance can fluctuate (Goldsmith et al., 2015, p. 2366), due
to a weak alliance portrayed mainly by the client such as; closed body language or cancellation
of counselling sessions (Cloninger & Cloninger, 2017). Also, the therapist during the therapy
might have applied the skill of confrontation which could upset the client thus creating a rupture
in their relationship. Even so, the therapy has to be successful even with such inconveniences.
This can be done, therapist giving guidance, providing validation to the client or saying positive
statements (Pearson, 2016, p.11-13) and with that the therapeutic alliance is strengthened.
In conclusion, it is clearly understood that the practitioner’s attributes are very important
contributors to the success of the therapy session. It is possible that each attribute can be weighed
separately in terms of its necessity as a contributing factor to the success of the therapeutic
session; however, it is opinionated that each is linked for a positive outcome. The therapist
8
towards the depiction of these attributes demonstrated to them is what determines the measure of
success the therapy would have. Also, a therapeutic alliance is found to have a causal effect on
the outcome of the therapy and as (Arditio & Rabellion, 2011) state, rupture-repair is inevitable
Reference list
Angus, L., Kagan, F. (2007). EMPATHIC RELATIONAL BONDS AND PERSONAL AGENCY IN PSYCHOTHERAPY:
Atzil-Slonim, D., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Schiefele, A. K., & Peri, T. (2015). Therapeutic bond
judgments: Congruence and incongruence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(4), 773.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2015.1085365
Blanchard, M., & Farber, B. A. (2016). Lying in psychotherapy: Why and what clients don’t tell their therapist about therapy and
Bourne, J. (2018). The Experience of Videoconferencing and Face-to Face Counselling from an Older Client's Perspective: An
Breger.L (2009). A Dream Of Undying fame. How Freud betrayed bis mentor and invented psychoanalysis
Cooper, M., O'Hara, M., Schmid, P. F., & Bohart, A. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of person-centred psychotherapy and
Cooper, M. (2019). CARL ROGERS'S 'CORE CONDITIONS': ARE THEY NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT?
(https://mick-cooper.squarespace.com/new-blog/2019/4/2/carl-rogerss-core-conditions-are-they-necessary-and-sufficie
nt)
Di Malta, G., Evans, C., & Cooper, M. (2019). Development and validation of the relational depth frequency scale.
Eager, E. (2010). Summary and evaluation of Carl Rogers’ necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change.
Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48( 1), 43.
Falkenström, F., Granstrom, F., &Holmqvist, R., (2013).Therapeutic Alliance Predicts Symptomatic Improvement Session by
Session. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032258)
Farber, B. A., & Doolin, E. M. (2011). Positive regard. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 58.
Farber, B. A., Suzuki, J. Y., & Lynch, D. A. (2018). Positive regard and psychotherapy outcome: A meta-analytic review.
Goldsmith, L. P., Lewis, S. W., Dunn, G., & Bentall, R. P. (2015). Psychological treatments for early psychosis can be
beneficial or harmful, depending on the therapeutic alliance: an instrumental variable analysis. Psychological
Hill, C. (2007). My Personal Reactions to Rogers (1957): The facilitative but neither necessary nor sufficient conditions of
therapeutic personality change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(3), 260-264.
Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1),
9.
Kolden, G. G., Klein, M. H., Wang, C. C., & Austin, S. B. (2011). Congruence/genuineness. Psychotherapy, 48( 1), 65.
Kolog, E. A., & Montero, C. S. (2018). Towards automated e-counselling system based on counsellors emotion perception.
Lapworth, P., & Sills, C. (2011). An introduction to transactional analysis: Helping people change. Sage Publications.
11
Mearns, D., Thorne, B., & McLeod, J. (2013). Person-centred counselling in action. Sage.
Shrivastava, A. (2014). Active empathic listening as a tool for better communication. International Journal of Marketing and
Tolan, J., & Cameron, R. (2016). Skills in person-centred counselling & psychotherapy. Sage.
Watson, J. C. (2016). The role of empathy in psychotherapy: Theory, research, and practice.
Hazler, Richard J., Counseling and Psychotherapy Theories and Interventions. Chapter 7: Person-Centered Theory. 6th Ed. 2016.