You are on page 1of 9

Electric Power Systems Research, 11 (1986) 129 - 137 129

An Algorithm for Optimum Control of Static VAR Compensators to Meet


Phase-wise Unbalanced Reactive Power Demands

D. THUKARAM, B. S. RAMAKRISHNA IYENGAR and K. PARTHASARATHY


Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012 (India)
(Received July 18, 1986)

SUMMARY weak to maintain the terminal voltage within


the acceptable variations, and (2) it is not
The operation o f thyristor-controlled static economical, or practical, to supply the reac-
V A R compensators (SVCs) at various conduc- tive power demand from the AC system.
tion angles can be used advantageously to Shunt compensators are generally used to
meet the unbalanced reactive power demands reduce or cancel the phase-wise unbalanced
in a system. However, such operation intro- reactive power (VAR) demand and to mini-
duces harmonic currents into the AC system. mize the reactive power drawn from the AC
This paper presents an algorithm to evaluate supply lines. Static V A R compensators are
an optimum combination o f the phase-wise preferred over the traditional VAR com-
reactive power generations from SVC and pensators such as saturable reactors and
balanced reactive power supply from the switched capacitors owing to additional
AC system, based on the defined perfor- advantages like fast response, high reliability,
mance indices, namely, the telephone influ- flexibility and low maintenance cost. Several
ence factor (TIF), the total harmonic current types of SVCs with different operating fea-
factor (IT) and the distortion factor (D). tures can be realized b y using various power
Results o f the studies conducted on a typical conversion concepts and thyristor circuits.
distribution system are presented and dis- The operation of thyristor-controlled com-
cussed. pensators at various conduction angles can
be used advantageously to meet the un-
balanced reactive power demands in a system.
1. I N T R O D U C T I O N However, such operation introduces harmonic
currents into the AC system. In such cases
Phase-wise unbalanced reactive power de- it becomes necessary either to minimize
mand in power systems is due to large single- harmonic generation internally or provide
phase loads and also to the large and fluc- external harmonic filters.
tuating industrial loads such as electric arc Frank and Landstrom [1] have presented
furnaces, rolling mills, etc. These loads un- a power factor correction method for bal-
balance the system and lead to wide fluctua- anced and unbalanced loads. They advocated
tions in the supply voltage and effects like the use of thyristor-controlled delta-con-
incandescent light flicker, television picture nected capacitors in series with reactors.
distortion, disturbance in electric control They also suggested that these reactors be
circuits and computer equipment, etc., which used as filters for the harmonic currents.
are undesirable to consumers. These types Barthold et al. [2] suggested a method of
of heavy industrial loads are normally con- determining the effect of harmonics in terms
centrated in one plant and are served from of defined performance indices. Engberg et
one network terminal; they can therefore al. [3] performed the harmonic analysis of
be handled best b y a local compensator con- phase currents in a delta-connected phase-
nected to the same terminal. There are two controlled reactor. The magnitudes of various
main reasons for compensating large fluc- order harmonics are plotted as functions
tuating loads: (1), the AC system is t o o of the firing angle of the thyristors. Hammed

0378-7796/86/$3.50 © Elsevier Sequoia/Printed in The Netherlands


130

and Mathur [4] proposed a new configura- studies conducted on a typical distribution
tion for the reactors to reduce the harmonic system for different loading and compensa-
generation. They suggested a parallel combi- tion conditions are presented to illustrate the
nation of two phase-controlled reactors in algorithm.
series with a fixed reactor. It is shown that,
by using this arrangement for the reactors
in a static VAR compensator, magnitudes 2. MATHEMATICALMODEL
of certain order harmonics can be reduced,
thereby eliminating the need of filters. 2.1. Compensator requirements
Gyugyi et al. [5] examined the theoretical Two types of static VAR compensa-
foundations of thyristor-controlled shunt tors, namely, the fixed capacitor-thyristor-
compensation. They established conditions controlled reactor (FC-TCR) and the thy-
for unbalanced load compensation and volt- istor-switched capacitor-thyristor-controlled
age stabilization with the use of symmetrical reactor (TSC-TCR) are considered for the
components, and suggested a scheme which analysis. The block schematic arrangement
employs a fixed capacitor in parallel with a of a typical SVC is shown in Fig. 1. The
thyristor-controlled inductor for the real- compensator essentially functions as a vari-
ization of variable susceptances. The harmon- able reactance {capacitive and inductive
ics generated by controlling the thyristor impedances). In order to establish the basic
switches were kept out of the line currents compensation requirements it is assumed
by placing the fixed capacitor in series with a that the phase-wise load demands are un-
filter network that draws the same funda- balanced and time invariant. A series of such
mental current at the system frequency and steady-state loads at discrete time instants,
provides low impedance shunt paths at the appropriately close to each other, can also
harmonic frequencies. Further, Gyugyi and be employed to represent time-varying loads.
Taylor [6] suggested two methods for mini- With this assumption, the compensator
mizing the harmonics generated internally by requirement is to generate/absorb unbalanced
the thyristor-controlled reactors. One m e t h o d reactive power which, when combined with
uses n reactor banks, each with 1In of the the load demand, will represent balanced
total rating, the reactor banks being con- load to the supply system. Consider a system
trolled sequentially, that is, only one of the as shown in Fig. 2, where bus 1 represents
n reactors is delay-angie controlled and each the AC system source node and bus 2 repre-
of the remaining n -- 1 reactors is either fully sents the load bus, with a static VAR com-
ON or fully OFF. The other m e t h o d uses two pensator connected at that bus. Let the
identical delta-connected thyristor-controlled phase-wise load demand be PLa + j Q L a ,
reactor banks, one operated from the wye- PLb +jQLb and PLc +jQLc. Assuming the
connected secondary windings, the other phase-wise load seen by the source (bus 1)
from the delta-connected windings of a sup- after compensation to be PLa + jQS~, PLb +
ply transformer. They also reported t h a t the jQSb and PLc + jQSc, the phase-wise voltages
harmonic cancellation is theoretically possible Va/6a, Vb/6 b and Vc/5e at the load bus (bus
by operating three, four, or more delta- 2) are given by
connected thyristor-controlled reactor banks [EL] ~bc = [ES] abc -- [ZS]~bc[I] abc (1)
with appropriately phase-shifted voltages.
This paper presents an algorithm to evalu- where
ate an optimum combination of the phase-
I a = (PLa -- jQSa)/V~/--6~
wise reactive power generations from SVC
and balanced reactive power supply from the Ib = (PLb -- jQSb )/VbL--6b
AC system based on the defined performance
I c = (PL¢ -- jQSc)/Vd--6~
indices TIF (telephone influence factor), IT
{total harmonic current factor) and D (distor- The nonlinear complex set of eqns. (1) can
tion factor). The approach results in mini- be solved for load bus voltages using a proce-
mization of the effect of harmonics in the dure similar to three-phase load flow analysis.
AC system, thereby reducing the burden on The phase-wise reactive power balance equa-
the external harmonic filter. Results of the tions at the load bus are
131

-~'-w .],/ PHASE A


"1~ ~ PHASE B

.jj PHASE C
QRb' ORo' QRc
QCb~ QCQ aCc'

Fixed Capacitorsl
Thyristor Switched Capacitors Thyristor Controlled Reactors

Fig. 1. Block schematic arrangement of an SVC for phase-wise reactive compensation.

BUS BUS
(!) ® QRa

>-
•~ IIII I
PI.a+jQi. a i I
ta
Rb q~Pt.b+JQs b PL b+JQLb i.a

&o xa

0 r, u

co
TCR
Fig. 3. Delta~onnected reactances of the thyristor-
Fig. 2. Line diagram of the system. controlled reactor.

[QS] abe + [QC] ab~ = [QR] abc+ [QL] ~bc (2) where
For a given phase-wise unbalanced reactive [B] = [Bab , Bbc , Boa] t
power d e m a n d [QL] abe , setting balanced
values for [QC] ~bc o f the FC-TSC and with Bah = 1/Xab, Bbc = 1/Xbc, Bc~ = 1/Xc~
[QS] ~bc of the source, the unbalanced reac- and [A ] is a 3 × 3 matrix with
tive power [QR] abe absorptions of the TCR A(1, 1 ) = V a V a - VaVb COS(6a- 65)
can be obtained from the set of eqns. (2).
A(1, 3) = Va V a - - Va V c cos(6 a -- 6c)
Considering the compensator as variable
delta-connected reactances as shown in Fig. A(2, 1) = Vb Vb -- Vb Va COS(6b -- 6a)
3, QRa, QRb and QRc are absorbed in the A(2, 2) = Vb Vb -- Vb Vc COS(6b -- 6¢)
unsymmetrical reactances Xab, Xbc and xca
of the TCR. Referring to Fig. 3, the fol- A(3, 2) = VcV¢ - - V c V b COS(6¢ -- 6b)
lowing relation can be obtained: A(3, 3) = V¢V¢ - - VcV~ cos(6c -- 6~)
[QR] abe = [AI[B] (3) A(1, 2) = A(2, 3) = A(3, 1) = 0.0
132

F o r t h e possible voltage c o n d i t i o n s at where


the supply bus and for given u n b a l a n c e d
(TIF)h = (Ih/If)Wh
reactive p o w e r absorptions, the values o f the
delta-connected reactances of the compen- (IT)h = I h Wh
sator can be o b t a i n e d f r o m the solution of
The f u n d a m e n t a l and harmonic compo-
eqns. (3).
nents of the line currents are obtained as a
difference of the corresponding branch
2.2. Realization of variable reactances
currents; It and I h are given by
The variable reactances of the compen-
sator are achieved by delaying the closure Ym
If - - - (G~ 2 + Hf2) 1/2 sin(cot -- ¢ -- 0~)
of the t h y r i s t o r switch by an angle a (0 < 21rwL
a < 7r/2). The u n s y m m e t r i c a l firing of thy-
ristors can be used advantageously to o b t a i n
I h -- - - ( G h 2 + H h 2 ) 1/2 sin[h(cot -- 4) -- Oh]
the u n s y m m e t r i c a l d e l t a - c o n n e c t e d reac- ncaL
tances. Considering o n l y the f u n d a m e n t a l
where
c o m p o n e n t , the u n s y m m e t r i c a l firing angles
a l , ~2 and a3 corresponding to the delta G f = 3 ~ - - 43" - - 2 s i n ( 2 3 ' ) - - 2 ~ - - s i n ( 2 / ~ )
r e a c t a n c e s Xab , Xbc and Xca can be o b t a i n e d
H t = V ~ [ I r - - 2¢ - - s i n ( 2 ~ ) ]
by solving the equations
Xab = X0b/[1 -- 2al/lr -- sin(2oq)/rr] (4a) sin[(h + 1)3'I sin[(h - - 1)3"]
Vh =
Xbc ---- X°c/[1 -- 2a2/zr -- sin(2a2)/n ] (4b) h+l h--1

Xca = Xc0a/[1 -- 2aa/Tr -- sin(2ola)/Tr] (4c) 2 sin 3' cos(h3") I tsin[(__h+ _1)~]
where X°b, Xb0c and Xc°a are the reactances for h 2 t h+l
full c o n d u c t i o n of thyristors corresponding
_ sin[(h -- 1)/3] _ 2 sin/3 cos(hfl) t
to zero firing angles, t h a t is, ~1 = a2 = a3 =
0.0. h--1 h
-
+ X/~ t s i n [ ( h _ - - l ) ~ ] _ sin[(h -- 1)~3]
2.3. Measurement of harmonic effects 2 ~ -#+1 h--1
The effect of h a r m o n i c s in the system is
generally measured b y t h e calculation of _ 2 sin fi cos(hfi) t
d e f i n e d p e r f o r m a n c e indices. The present h
state of the art suggests t h e investigation of
the three factors [2] TIF, IT and D. T I F Of = tan-l(H~/Gf)
provides a measure o f t e l e p h o n e interference
t h a t m a y result f r o m the presence of har-
Oh = tan-l(Hh/Gh)
monic voltages adjacent to the point of h = h a r m o n i c order, (6k -+ 1), k = 1, 2, 3 . . . . ;
c o n n e c t i o n of the SVC. IT provides a mea- the + sign is for h a r m o n i c s of order 6k + 1,
sure of t h e T I F t h a t m a y result f r o m har- the -- sign for h a r m o n i c s of order ( 6 k - 1);
monic currents injected into the AC system = 0, 3" = a l , ~ = a3 for line current ia; ~ =
by the c o m p e n s a t o r , and D is a measure of 2~r/3, 3' = a2, ~ = a l for line current ib ; ¢ =
AC sinusoidal voltage distortion. The per- 47r/3, 3' = a3, ~ = a2 for line current ic.
f o r m a n c e indices T I F , IT and D are com- For triple h a r m o n i c s (3rd, 9th, ...)
p u t e d by the equations sin[(h + 1)3"/] sin[(h -- 1)3']
Gh ~
h+l h--1
T I F = [ ~=1 (TIF)h2]
2 sin 7 cos(h3") sin[(h + 1)/}]
+
1/2
h h+l

sin[(h -- 1)j3] 2 sin f~ cos(hi3)


h--1 h
D = (Ih/If)
h=2 Hh=O
133

3. COMPUTATIONALPROCEDURE the harmonic analysis of the three AC line


currents. Pick the set having a maximum
For a given unbalanced reactive power value for TIF, IT and D.
load demand [QL] abe it is possible to obtain Step 10. Check whether the performance
multiple combinations of balanced values indices TIF, IT and D are within the satisfac-
for [QC] ~bc and [QS] abc, and the unbalanced tory limits or the latest computed values for
reactive power [QR] abe absorptions of TCR. TIF, IT and D are greater than the previously
Different combinations o f firing angles of computed values. If they are within the satis-
the TCR and voltage conditions give different factory limits or they are increasing com-
sets of performance indices TIF, IT and D. pared with the previously c o m p u t e d values,
The particular combination which gives go to step 13.
minimum TIF, IT and D is selected as the Step 11. Increase the values of QC~ =
optimum. A computer program has been QCb = QCc to the next higher setting pos-
developed for the purpose. The proposed sible, or assume an increased balanced reac-
algorithm is flexible enough to be imple- tive power supply QSa = QSb = QSo by the
mented using microprocessor-based hard- source.
ware. The following is a summary of the Step 12. Advance the iteration and go to
steps involved in the program. step 4.
Step 1. Read the system data related to Step 13. Print the optimum settings of the
(a) the source bus (bus 1) voltage, (b) the compensator and the corresponding values
line impedance between the source bus and of the performance indices TIF, IT and D.
load bus, (c) the unbalanced load demand
at the load bus, (d) the rated capacity of
the SVC, that is, (i) capacitive range, (ii) 4. TYPICAL SYSTEM STUDIES AND RESULTS
inductive range.
Step 2. Initially assume the load reactive The system used in the studies is shown in
power demand is met completely b y the Fig. 2. The unbalanced load was considered
compensator only, that is, unit power factor to be fed from a substation. The parameters
load is seen by the source. Set QS~ = QSb = of the line between the source bus and
QSc = 0.0. the load bus were taken as R~ = R b = R c =
Step 3. Set the FC-TSC values close to the 0.008 55 p.u. per phase, and Xa = Xb = Xc =
maximum of phase-wise load reactive power 0.080 30 p.u. per phase.
demands, that is, set QC~ = QCb = QC~ =
close to maximum of QLa, QLb and QLc. 4.1. Case 1
Step 4. C o m p u t e the voltages at the load The phase-wise load conditions considered
bus (bus 2) assuming the phase-wise load were PLa = 30.0, PLb = 29.0, PLc = 28.0 MW,
seen b y the source a s PLa + jQSa, PLb + jQSb and QL a = 2 0 . 0 , QL b = 1 8 . 0 , QL c = 1 6 . 0
and PLc + jQSc. MVAR. The rated values of the SVC were
Step 5. Compute the phase-wise reactive 20.0 MVAR for the F C - T S C and 10.0 MVAR
powers QRa, QRb and QRc to be absorbed for the TCR.
by the TCR. The various possible combinations of SVC
Step 6. Compute the corresponding values to meet the unbalanced load demands and
of delta-connected reactances Xab, Xbc and the corresponding effects of harmonics mea-
XCa of the TCR to meet the phase-wise volt- sured by the performance indices are given
age and reactive power absorption conditions in Table 1. The o p t i m u m settings corre-
at the TCR. sponding to the minimum values of the per-
Step 7. Check for the design limitations formance indices TIF, IT and D are QSa =
of the delta-connected reactances of the QSb = QSc = 4.0 MVAR, and QCa = QCb =
TCR. If unsatisfactory, go to step 11. QCc = 20.0 MVAR.
Step 8. Compute the unsymmetrical The phase-wise unbalanced reactive power
firing angles c~1, a2 and c~3 of the TCR cor- absorption and the corresponding firing angles
responding to the reactances. of the TCR are QRa = 4.0, QRb = 6.0, QRc =
S t e p 9. Obtain the values for the perfor- 8.0 MVAR, and czI = 58.3, a2 = 33.3, c~3 =
mance indices TIF, IT and D by performing 43.2 deg.
134

TABLE 1
Summary of the results of harmonic analysis for case 1 ; performance indices for various SVC combinations
Rated value of FC-TSC = 20.0 MVAR; rated value of TCR = 10.0 MVAR; PLa = 30.0, PL b = 29.0, PL c = 28.0
MW; QL a = 20.0, QL b = 18.0, QL c = 16.0 MVAR.

FC-TSC Source Phase-wise MVAR absorptions of TCR and Maximum of three-phase


settings settings corresponding firing angles (deg) performance indices
QCa, QCB QS~, QSb
and QC c and QS c QRa QRb QRc ~1 ~: ~3 TIF IT D
(MVAR) (MVAR)
20.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 - - - Not feasible
20.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 -- -- -- Not feasible
20.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 87.4 38.0 49.6 571.9 0.241 0.373
20.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 65.0 35.6 46.2 325.0 0.251 0.208
20.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 58.3 33.3 43.2 184.0 0.190 0.144
(Optimum)
20.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 53.4 31.1 40.4 326.0 0.259 0.244
20.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 . . . . Not feasible

The minimum values of the performance t h e p e r f o r m a n c e i n d i c e s a r e g i v e n in T a b l e 2.


indices for this case are TIF = 184.0, IT = The optimum settings corresponding to the
0.190, D = 0.144. minimum values of the performance indices
a r e Q S a = Q S b = QSc = 3 . 0 M V A R , a n d QCa =
4.2. Case 2 QCb = QCc = 2 0 . 0 M V A R .
The phase-wise load conditions considered The phase-wise balanced reactive power
in t h i s c a s e w e r e t h e s a m e as in c a s e 1. T h e absorptions and the corresponding firing
rated values of the SVC were 20.0 MVAR angles of the TCR are QRa = QRb = QRc =
for the FC-TSC and 15.0 MVAR for the 8 . 0 M V A R , a n d a 1 = (~: = ~3 = 4 5 . 0 d e g .
TCR. The minimum values of the performance
The optimum settings corresponding to i n d i c e s o b t a i n e d in t h i s c a s e a r e T I F = 4 7 . 2 ,
the minimum values of the performance IT = 0.058, D = 0.123.
i n d i c e s a r e QSa = QSb = QSc = 8 . 0 M V A R ,
a n d QCa = QCb = QCc = 2 0 . 0 M V A R . 4.4. Case 4
The phase-wise unbalanced reactive power This case study was carried out to find
absorptions and the corresponding firing the effect of SVC rating to meet a certain
angles of the TCR are QRa = 8.0, QRb = 10.0, load demand. In this case the load conditions
Q R c = 1 2 . 0 M V A R , a n d ~1 = 4 9 . 4 , (~: = 3 4 . 6 , c o n s i d e r e d w e r e t h e s a m e as in c a s e 1. F o r
~3 = 4 1 . 2 d e g . the different rated SVCs, the optimum com-
The minimum values of the performance binations of SVC corresponding to the mini-
indices are TIF = 276.8, IT = 0.342, D = mum values of the performance indices are
0.224. g i v e n in T a b l e 3.

4.3. Case 3 4.5. Case 5


This case was studied with balanced load The purpose of this case study was the
conditions for comparison and to confirm s a m e as f o r c a s e 4, t h a t is, t o f i n d t h e e f f e c t
c e r t a i n o b s e r v a t i o n s m a d e in t h e p r e v i o u s of SVC rating to meet a certain load demand.
case studies. The balanced load conditions In this case the load conditions considered
considered were PLa = PLb = PLc = 30.0 MW, were different from the case 4 conditions.
and QL a = QLb = QLe = 20.0 MVAR. The The load conditions considered were PLa =
rated values of the SVC were 20.0 MVAR 6 0 . 0 , P L b = 5 8 . 0 , P L e = 5 6 . 0 MW, a n d Q L a =
for the FC-TSC and 15.0 MVAR for the 4 0 . 0 , Q L b = 3 6 . 0 , QL¢ = 3 2 . 0 M V A R .
TCR. For the different rated SVCs, the optimum
The various balanced combinations of combinations of SVC corresponding to the
SVC to meet the balanced load reactive pow- minimum values of the performance indices
er d e m a n d s a n d t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g v a l u e s o f a r e g i v e n in T a b l e 4.
135

TABLE 2
S u m m a r y o f t h e results o f h a r m o n i c analysis for case 3 ; p e r f o r m a n c e indices for various SVC c o m b i n a t i o n s
R a t e d value o f F C - T S C = 20.0 M V A R ; r a t e d value o f T C R = 15.0 M V A R ; PLa = PLb = PLc = 30.0 MW; Q L a =
Q L b = Q L c = 20.0 M V A R .

FC-TSC Source Balanced M V A R absorptions of T C R P e r f o r m a n c e indices


settings settings and corresponding firingangles (deg)
QCa, QCb QSa, QSb
a n d QCc a n d QS c QRa = Q R b = QRc ~1 = ~2 = ~3 TIF IT D
(MVAR) (MVAR)

20.0 1.0 1.0 68.3 906.0 0.437 0.598


20.0 2.0 2.0 62.5 323.8 0.207 0.346
20.0 3.0 3.0 58.3 235.2 0.180 0.282
20.0 4.0 4.0 55.0 460.7 0.403 0.349
20.0 5.0 5.0 52.1 458.8 0.447 0.325
20.0 6.0 6.0 49.5 331.3 0.353 0.268
20.0 7.0 7.0 47.2 159.0 0.184 0.186
20.0 8.0 8.0 45.0 47.2 0.058 0.123
(Optimum)
20.0 9.0 9.0 43.0 163.1 0.215 0.166
20.0 10.0 10.0 41.1 253.0 0.354 0.192
20.0 11.0 11.0 39.4 296.9 0.438 0.195
20.0 12.0 12.0 37.7 298.9 0.463 0.181
20.0 13.0 13.0 36.0 267.4 0.434 0.176
20.0 14.0 14.0 34.4 211.7 0.359 0.157
20.0 15.0 15.0 32.9 141.7 0.251 0.130

TABLE 3
S u m m a r y o f t h e results o f h a r m o n i c analysis for case 4; m i n i m u m p e r f o r m a n c e indices for various ratings o f SVC
FC-TSC r a t i n g --- 20.0 M V A R ; P L a = 30.0, PLb = 29.0, P L c = 28.0 MW; Q L a = 20.0, Q L b = 18.0, QLc = 16.0
MVAR.

TCR Phase-wise Optimum combination of MVAR absorptions of Minimum performance


rating balanced T C R a n d c o r r e s p o n d i n g firing angles (deg) indices
(MVAR) MVAR from
source QRa QRb QRc ~1 0~2 C~3 TIF IT D

10.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 58.3 33.3 43.2 184.0 0.190 0.144
15.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 49.4 34.6 41.2 276.8 0.342 0.224
20.0 16.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 40.0 30.7 35.2 258.4 0.538 0.172
25.0 20.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 39.4 31.8 35.5 266.7 0.714 0.178
30.0 26.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 37.2 31.0 34.0 266.2 0.910 0.183
40.0 19.0 19.0 21.0 23.0 48.3 42.0 45.0 224.0 0.771 0.201
50.0 24.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 47.6 42.6 45.0 192.5 0.816 0.184
60.0 29.0 29.0 31.0 33.0 47.2 42.9 45.0 172.1 0.868 0.176

4.6. DISCUSSION O F T H E C A S E STUDIES higher or lower values of the delta reactances


of the TCR.
From the results of the above case studies, (iii) The effect of harmonics is a minimum
the following observations may be made. for a particular combination of reactive
(i) The AC system line current harmonic power absorptions which is around half the
magnitudes vary depending upon the firing rated value of the TCR, that is, for firing
angles of the TCR. angle combinations around 45 ° .
(ii) The effect of the harmonics is consid- (iv) The combination of a low rated F C -
erable if the firing angles are either too low T S C and a higher rated T C R gives rise to
or too high, that is, corresponding to either higher magnitudes of harmonic effects. To
136

TABLE 4
S u m m a r y o f t h e results o f h a r m o n i c analysis for case 5 ; m i n i m u m p e r f o r m a n c e indices for various ratings of SVC
F C - T S C rating = 40.0 M V A R ; P L a = 60.0, P L b = 58.0, P L c = 56.0 MW; Q L a = 40.0, Q L b = 36.0, Q L c = 32.0
MVAR.

TCR Phase-wise Optimum combination of MVAR absorptions of Minimum performance


rating balanced T C R a n d c o r r e s p o n d i n g firing angles (deg) indices
(MVAR) MVAR from
source QRa QRb QRc Ctl ~2 C/3 TIF IT D

15.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 86.2 31.7 45.1 287.0 0.311 0.195
20.0 8.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 58.1 33.0 43.0 196.9 0.347 0.197
25.0 10.0 10.0 14.0 18.0 56.0 35.6 44.1 288.5 0.702 0.196
30.0 22.0 22.0 26.0 30.0 42.5 29.6 35.6 282.1 0.833 0.189
40.0 31.0 31.0 34.0 38.0 40.1 30.5 35.1 255.8 1.054 0.171
50.0 39.0 39.0 43.0 47.0 39.2 31.4 35.2 262.9 1.425 0.179
60.0 27.0 27.0 31.0 35.0 49.5 40.9 45.0 285.5 1.428 0.227

minimize the effect of harmonics, the TCR NOMENCLATURE


has to be controlled to absorb more reactive
power, which has to be drawn from the AC [EL] a b c = [ELa, ELb, ELc] t
system. Hence, the TCR has to be properly = [Va/Sa, Vb/Sb, Vc/_~] t, phase-
rated so as to demand minimum VARs from wise complex voltages at load bus
the source t h r o u g h o u t its control range. This [ES] abc = [ESa, ESb, ESc] t, phase-wise com-
implies that the size of SVC is to be based plex voltages at source bus
upon the load requirements. [QS] abc = [QS~, QSb, QSc] t, phase-wise
reactive power supplied b y source
[ Q C ] abc = [QCa, QCb, QCc] t, phase-wise
reactive power supplied by F C -
5. C O N C L U S I O N S TSC
[QR] abe= [QRa, QRb, QRc] t, phase-wise
An algorithm for evaluating the o p t i m u m reactive power absorbed by TCR
combination of phase-wise reactive power [QL]abc=[QLa, QLb, QLc] t, phase-wise
generations/absorptions from static V A R reactive power load demand
compensators to meet unbalanced reactive [ZS] ab~ 3 × 3 matrix representing source
p o w e r load demands based on the perfor- impedance
mance indices TIF, IT and D has been pre-
sented. The model developed provides the h harmonic order
compensator requirements in terms of the It RMS values of fundamental line
measurable quantities of load reactive power currents
demands. The approach results in minimiza-
Ih RMS values of harmonic line cur-
tion of the effect of harmonics injected by rents
L inductance of each reactor, H
the unsymmetrical operation of the com-
Vm maximum value of line-to-line volt-
pensator into the AC system and thereby
reduces the burden on the external harmonic age
filters. A computer program based on the Wh weighting factor for harmonic of
proposed algorithm has been developed and order h
implemented in a few typical distribution c~ fundamental frequency, rad s-1
systems. The results obtained for one typical
system for different load conditions and
REFERENCES
SVC ratings have been presented. The pro-
posed algorithm has the advantage that it 1 H. F r a n k a n d B. L a n d s t r o m , P o w e r f a c t o r correc-
can be implemented using microprocessor- tion with thyristor controlled capacitors, A S E A
based hardware. J., 44 (6) ( 1 9 7 1 ) 180 - 184.
137

2 L. O. Barthold et al. ( C I G R E Working Group phase-controlled V A R compensators. Part I:


31-01), Modelling of static shunt V A R systems Steady state performance, Part II: Transient per-
(SVS) for system analysis, Electra, 51 (Mar.) formance, IEEE Trans.,PAS-98 (1979) 219 - 231.
(1977) 45 - 74. L. Gyugyi, R. A. Otto and T. H. Putman, Princi-
3 K. Engberg and S. Torseng, Reactors and capaci- ples and applications of static, thyristor con-
tors controlled by thyristors for optimum power trolled shunt compensators, IEEE Trans., PAS-
system VAR control, E P R I Seminar on Transmis- 97 (Sept./Oct.) (1978) 1935 - 1945.
sion Static V A R Systems, Duluth, MN, Oct. 24 - L. Gyugyi and E. R. Taylor, Jr,, Characteristic
25, 1978. of static, thyristor controlled shunt compensa-
4 A. E. Hammed and R. M. Mathur, A new gen- tors for power transmission system applications,
eralized concept for the design of thyristor IEEE Trans., PAS-99 (1980) 1795 - 1804.

You might also like