Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Mathur [4] proposed a new configura- studies conducted on a typical distribution
tion for the reactors to reduce the harmonic system for different loading and compensa-
generation. They suggested a parallel combi- tion conditions are presented to illustrate the
nation of two phase-controlled reactors in algorithm.
series with a fixed reactor. It is shown that,
by using this arrangement for the reactors
in a static VAR compensator, magnitudes 2. MATHEMATICALMODEL
of certain order harmonics can be reduced,
thereby eliminating the need of filters. 2.1. Compensator requirements
Gyugyi et al. [5] examined the theoretical Two types of static VAR compensa-
foundations of thyristor-controlled shunt tors, namely, the fixed capacitor-thyristor-
compensation. They established conditions controlled reactor (FC-TCR) and the thy-
for unbalanced load compensation and volt- istor-switched capacitor-thyristor-controlled
age stabilization with the use of symmetrical reactor (TSC-TCR) are considered for the
components, and suggested a scheme which analysis. The block schematic arrangement
employs a fixed capacitor in parallel with a of a typical SVC is shown in Fig. 1. The
thyristor-controlled inductor for the real- compensator essentially functions as a vari-
ization of variable susceptances. The harmon- able reactance {capacitive and inductive
ics generated by controlling the thyristor impedances). In order to establish the basic
switches were kept out of the line currents compensation requirements it is assumed
by placing the fixed capacitor in series with a that the phase-wise load demands are un-
filter network that draws the same funda- balanced and time invariant. A series of such
mental current at the system frequency and steady-state loads at discrete time instants,
provides low impedance shunt paths at the appropriately close to each other, can also
harmonic frequencies. Further, Gyugyi and be employed to represent time-varying loads.
Taylor [6] suggested two methods for mini- With this assumption, the compensator
mizing the harmonics generated internally by requirement is to generate/absorb unbalanced
the thyristor-controlled reactors. One m e t h o d reactive power which, when combined with
uses n reactor banks, each with 1In of the the load demand, will represent balanced
total rating, the reactor banks being con- load to the supply system. Consider a system
trolled sequentially, that is, only one of the as shown in Fig. 2, where bus 1 represents
n reactors is delay-angie controlled and each the AC system source node and bus 2 repre-
of the remaining n -- 1 reactors is either fully sents the load bus, with a static VAR com-
ON or fully OFF. The other m e t h o d uses two pensator connected at that bus. Let the
identical delta-connected thyristor-controlled phase-wise load demand be PLa + j Q L a ,
reactor banks, one operated from the wye- PLb +jQLb and PLc +jQLc. Assuming the
connected secondary windings, the other phase-wise load seen by the source (bus 1)
from the delta-connected windings of a sup- after compensation to be PLa + jQS~, PLb +
ply transformer. They also reported t h a t the jQSb and PLc + jQSc, the phase-wise voltages
harmonic cancellation is theoretically possible Va/6a, Vb/6 b and Vc/5e at the load bus (bus
by operating three, four, or more delta- 2) are given by
connected thyristor-controlled reactor banks [EL] ~bc = [ES] abc -- [ZS]~bc[I] abc (1)
with appropriately phase-shifted voltages.
This paper presents an algorithm to evalu- where
ate an optimum combination of the phase-
I a = (PLa -- jQSa)/V~/--6~
wise reactive power generations from SVC
and balanced reactive power supply from the Ib = (PLb -- jQSb )/VbL--6b
AC system based on the defined performance
I c = (PL¢ -- jQSc)/Vd--6~
indices TIF (telephone influence factor), IT
{total harmonic current factor) and D (distor- The nonlinear complex set of eqns. (1) can
tion factor). The approach results in mini- be solved for load bus voltages using a proce-
mization of the effect of harmonics in the dure similar to three-phase load flow analysis.
AC system, thereby reducing the burden on The phase-wise reactive power balance equa-
the external harmonic filter. Results of the tions at the load bus are
131
.jj PHASE C
QRb' ORo' QRc
QCb~ QCQ aCc'
Fixed Capacitorsl
Thyristor Switched Capacitors Thyristor Controlled Reactors
BUS BUS
(!) ® QRa
>-
•~ IIII I
PI.a+jQi. a i I
ta
Rb q~Pt.b+JQs b PL b+JQLb i.a
&o xa
0 r, u
co
TCR
Fig. 3. Delta~onnected reactances of the thyristor-
Fig. 2. Line diagram of the system. controlled reactor.
[QS] abe + [QC] ab~ = [QR] abc+ [QL] ~bc (2) where
For a given phase-wise unbalanced reactive [B] = [Bab , Bbc , Boa] t
power d e m a n d [QL] abe , setting balanced
values for [QC] ~bc o f the FC-TSC and with Bah = 1/Xab, Bbc = 1/Xbc, Bc~ = 1/Xc~
[QS] ~bc of the source, the unbalanced reac- and [A ] is a 3 × 3 matrix with
tive power [QR] abe absorptions of the TCR A(1, 1 ) = V a V a - VaVb COS(6a- 65)
can be obtained from the set of eqns. (2).
A(1, 3) = Va V a - - Va V c cos(6 a -- 6c)
Considering the compensator as variable
delta-connected reactances as shown in Fig. A(2, 1) = Vb Vb -- Vb Va COS(6b -- 6a)
3, QRa, QRb and QRc are absorbed in the A(2, 2) = Vb Vb -- Vb Vc COS(6b -- 6¢)
unsymmetrical reactances Xab, Xbc and xca
of the TCR. Referring to Fig. 3, the fol- A(3, 2) = VcV¢ - - V c V b COS(6¢ -- 6b)
lowing relation can be obtained: A(3, 3) = V¢V¢ - - VcV~ cos(6c -- 6~)
[QR] abe = [AI[B] (3) A(1, 2) = A(2, 3) = A(3, 1) = 0.0
132
Xca = Xc0a/[1 -- 2aa/Tr -- sin(2ola)/Tr] (4c) 2 sin 3' cos(h3") I tsin[(__h+ _1)~]
where X°b, Xb0c and Xc°a are the reactances for h 2 t h+l
full c o n d u c t i o n of thyristors corresponding
_ sin[(h -- 1)/3] _ 2 sin/3 cos(hfl) t
to zero firing angles, t h a t is, ~1 = a2 = a3 =
0.0. h--1 h
-
+ X/~ t s i n [ ( h _ - - l ) ~ ] _ sin[(h -- 1)~3]
2.3. Measurement of harmonic effects 2 ~ -#+1 h--1
The effect of h a r m o n i c s in the system is
generally measured b y t h e calculation of _ 2 sin fi cos(hfi) t
d e f i n e d p e r f o r m a n c e indices. The present h
state of the art suggests t h e investigation of
the three factors [2] TIF, IT and D. T I F Of = tan-l(H~/Gf)
provides a measure o f t e l e p h o n e interference
t h a t m a y result f r o m the presence of har-
Oh = tan-l(Hh/Gh)
monic voltages adjacent to the point of h = h a r m o n i c order, (6k -+ 1), k = 1, 2, 3 . . . . ;
c o n n e c t i o n of the SVC. IT provides a mea- the + sign is for h a r m o n i c s of order 6k + 1,
sure of t h e T I F t h a t m a y result f r o m har- the -- sign for h a r m o n i c s of order ( 6 k - 1);
monic currents injected into the AC system = 0, 3" = a l , ~ = a3 for line current ia; ~ =
by the c o m p e n s a t o r , and D is a measure of 2~r/3, 3' = a2, ~ = a l for line current ib ; ¢ =
AC sinusoidal voltage distortion. The per- 47r/3, 3' = a3, ~ = a2 for line current ic.
f o r m a n c e indices T I F , IT and D are com- For triple h a r m o n i c s (3rd, 9th, ...)
p u t e d by the equations sin[(h + 1)3"/] sin[(h -- 1)3']
Gh ~
h+l h--1
T I F = [ ~=1 (TIF)h2]
2 sin 7 cos(h3") sin[(h + 1)/}]
+
1/2
h h+l
TABLE 1
Summary of the results of harmonic analysis for case 1 ; performance indices for various SVC combinations
Rated value of FC-TSC = 20.0 MVAR; rated value of TCR = 10.0 MVAR; PLa = 30.0, PL b = 29.0, PL c = 28.0
MW; QL a = 20.0, QL b = 18.0, QL c = 16.0 MVAR.
TABLE 2
S u m m a r y o f t h e results o f h a r m o n i c analysis for case 3 ; p e r f o r m a n c e indices for various SVC c o m b i n a t i o n s
R a t e d value o f F C - T S C = 20.0 M V A R ; r a t e d value o f T C R = 15.0 M V A R ; PLa = PLb = PLc = 30.0 MW; Q L a =
Q L b = Q L c = 20.0 M V A R .
TABLE 3
S u m m a r y o f t h e results o f h a r m o n i c analysis for case 4; m i n i m u m p e r f o r m a n c e indices for various ratings o f SVC
FC-TSC r a t i n g --- 20.0 M V A R ; P L a = 30.0, PLb = 29.0, P L c = 28.0 MW; Q L a = 20.0, Q L b = 18.0, QLc = 16.0
MVAR.
10.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 58.3 33.3 43.2 184.0 0.190 0.144
15.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 49.4 34.6 41.2 276.8 0.342 0.224
20.0 16.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 40.0 30.7 35.2 258.4 0.538 0.172
25.0 20.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 39.4 31.8 35.5 266.7 0.714 0.178
30.0 26.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 37.2 31.0 34.0 266.2 0.910 0.183
40.0 19.0 19.0 21.0 23.0 48.3 42.0 45.0 224.0 0.771 0.201
50.0 24.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 47.6 42.6 45.0 192.5 0.816 0.184
60.0 29.0 29.0 31.0 33.0 47.2 42.9 45.0 172.1 0.868 0.176
TABLE 4
S u m m a r y o f t h e results o f h a r m o n i c analysis for case 5 ; m i n i m u m p e r f o r m a n c e indices for various ratings of SVC
F C - T S C rating = 40.0 M V A R ; P L a = 60.0, P L b = 58.0, P L c = 56.0 MW; Q L a = 40.0, Q L b = 36.0, Q L c = 32.0
MVAR.
15.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 86.2 31.7 45.1 287.0 0.311 0.195
20.0 8.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 58.1 33.0 43.0 196.9 0.347 0.197
25.0 10.0 10.0 14.0 18.0 56.0 35.6 44.1 288.5 0.702 0.196
30.0 22.0 22.0 26.0 30.0 42.5 29.6 35.6 282.1 0.833 0.189
40.0 31.0 31.0 34.0 38.0 40.1 30.5 35.1 255.8 1.054 0.171
50.0 39.0 39.0 43.0 47.0 39.2 31.4 35.2 262.9 1.425 0.179
60.0 27.0 27.0 31.0 35.0 49.5 40.9 45.0 285.5 1.428 0.227