You are on page 1of 9

m

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia


Vice President for Academic Issues and Research
Course: English 0
Code: 90030
Activity guidelines and evaluation rubric – Task 2: Writing
Production

1. Activity description

Type of the activity: Individual


Evaluation moment : Intermediate at Unit 1
Activity higher score: 120 grades
Activity starting date:
Activity deadline: martes, 20 de
miércoles, 9 de septiembre de
octubre de 2020
2020
In this activity, it is expected to achieve the following learning
results:
The student will be able to write a text using vocabulary and daily
expressions in postcards as part of the communicative competence in
English.
The activity lies in:

Stage 1- Access the Ebook “Level A1” (Learning Environment) and


study Modules 1 to 6 (Unit 1).

Stage 2 – Do exercises of modules you can look below; take


screenshots of your answers and submit in the forum of this activity,
that you can find at Learning Environment:
 Module 6 – 10 Module 2 - 9
m

 Module 3 – 13 Module 6 - 4

 Module 5 -3

Stage 3- Do 3 postcards including a picture with the following


information:

Postcard 1: Describe a member of the family with complete sentences


including personal information like: name, age, occupation, nacionality.
A physical description must also be included: weight, height, hair, eyes,
etc.
m

- Postcard 2: Describe five actions the member of the family is doing right
now:

- Postcard 3: Write 5 sentences about activities you do daily:


m

Note: Each postcard must have complete sentences


(noun+verb+complement). Then access Learning Environment and send
3 postcards in the forum (files cannot be attached).

Stage 4 - Check your partners’ postcards in the forum and make 2


meaningful comments (appreciations, corrections, etc.) that helps his
partners to find out their mistakes and then strengthen their learning
and improve their writing.

Stage 5 – Make corrections in your postcards taking into account


comments and suggestions made by tutor and partners.

To develop this activity, consider:


At initial information environment, you must: Check the Course Agenda.

At evaluation environment, you must: Send screenshots with exercises


and 3 postcards in the forum. Each student must make at least 2
comments about other partners’ postcards.

At learning environment, you must: Load individual task in PDF format


including corrections suggested by partners.

Take into account that the final task must be a product of your ingenuity
and creativity. For no reason tasks that are not original or are taken from
Internet will be accepted.

Individual work evidences:


The individual evidences to submit are:

In a PDF format each student must conoslidate the following evidences of


his participation in the forum:

- Front page with full name, code, program he/she studies and group
number, among others.

1. Screenshots of practice exercises taken from the forum.


2. 3 postcards done (if you use a software or an app, you must share
m

the link of that software).


3. Evidence of meaningful comments about other group partners’
postcards (corrections, suggestions, etc.)
4. If you cited, you must include Table of References.

This paper must be sent at the Evaluation Environment:

This is how you must sent the final task:

Group work evidences


At this activity no evidences needed

2. General guidelines for the development of the evidence to


submit

For evidence developed Individual, consider the following


guidelines:

1. Every member of the group must participate with academic


contributions in the activity development.

2. Before delivering the requested product, all the requirements


indicated in this activity guide must be checked.

3. All tasks must take into account spelling rules and requirements
stated in the guide.

4. Every member must share meaningful contributions along the


activity.

5. Every member of the group are responsible for making individual


task requested.
m

Take into account that all individual or group written work must fulfil
with the orthographic rules and presentation conditions that have been
defined.
Concerning the use of references, consider that the requested work in
this activity must fulfil with the standards Elija un elemento.
In any case, the standards of reference must be complied. Academic
plagiarism must be avoided. Students can support the written products
by using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual campus.

Consider that In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article 99, it
is considered as offenses that undermine the academic order, among
others, the following: literal e) “Plagiarism, that is, submitting as of its
own authorship the all or part of a work, document or invention made
by another person.

It also implies the use of quotes or false references, or proposing quotes


where there is no match between it and the reference ”and literal f)
“Reproducing or copying for profit, educational materials or results of
research products, which have intellectual rights reserved for the
University.

The academic sanctions the student will face are the following:

a) In cases of academic fraud demonstrated in the respective academic


work or evaluation, the grade that will be imposed will be zero points
without prejudice to the corresponding disciplinary sanction.

b) In cases related to plagiarism demonstrated in the academic work


whatever its nature, the qualification that will be imposed will be zero
points, without prejudice to the corresponding disciplinary sanction.
m

b) Evaluation rubric Format

Type of the activity: Individual


Evaluation moment: Intermediate at Unit 1
Activity higher score: 120 grades
High level: The student develops online content practices
requested, where shows a good use of gramar and topic.
Practice exercises are sent in the forum on time, more than 3
days before deadline.
First evaluation
If your work is at this level, you will get from 15 points to
standard:
20 points
Procedure and
participation
Medium level: Some practice exercises are sent in the forum
on time. Some execises show you understand properly the
Stage 1 and 2
topics.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 9 points to
14 points
This standard
Low level: The student doesn’t load the practices in the forum.
represents 20
The contributions are not meaningful and were shared just at the
score of the
end of the activity. The studens doesn’t use appropriately the
activity
topics in the pactices.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points to 8
points

High level: The sentences in the postcards have the correct


Second evaluation structure and follow the tutor’s guidelines. The sentences uses
standard: the punctuation properly.
Content If your work is at this level, you will get from 20 points to
30 points
Stage 3
Medium level: The postcards have a structure but the student
doesn’t follow all the guidelines. There are some spelling
mistakes, words in Spanish and connectors that changes the text
This standard coherence.
represents 30 If your work is at this level, you will get from 10 points to
score of the 19 points
activity
Low level: The student doesn’t do the postdards and/or the
m

length of the text is not the appropriate. The content is not


according to the requested. The text is not coherent in its content
and its porcedure int he forum
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points to 9
points

High level: The postcards meet the gramar and vocabulary


Third evaluation issues appropriatlely according to the guide. The text uses a
standard: proper vocabulary.
Content If your work is at this level, you will get from 20 points to
30 points
Stage 3
Medium level: The postcards have only some gramar and
Grammar issues vocabulary issues established in the guide. The text shows
mistakes regarding grammar.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 10 points to
19 points
This standard
represents 30 Low level: The students doesn’t do the postcards. The text
score of the doesn’t meet the gramar issues requested.
activity If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points to 9
points
High level: The student shares meaningful and timely
Fourth evaluation
contributions to other partners’ postcards. The students makes
standard:
corrections suggested in the forum by tutor and partners.
Participation and
If your work is at this level, you will get from 14 points to
procedure
20 points
Stage 4 and 5
Medium level: The students makes comments in the forum but
they are not meaninful contributions. The students doesn’t make
Contributions to
corrections on time according to the suggestios in the forum.
partners’ postcards.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 7 points to
13 points

Low level: The students doesn’t share contributions in the


This standard
forum. The student doesn’t make corrections or he doesn’t
represents xx
participate in this activity.
score of the
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points to 7
activity
points
Fifth evaluation High level: The student develops all the stages stated in the
m

standard: guide. The postcards meet appropriately the guide requirements.


Formal and The final paper in PDF according to the example is sent at the
procedure Evaluation Environment. APA rules are used.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 14 points to
Organization of 20 points
delivery of final task
Medium level: All stages were not developed in the final task.
Final task is not sent in PDF format. Final task is not sent in the
correct resource and updated references are nos used.
This standard If your work is at this level, you will get from 7 points to
represents 20 13 points
score of the
activity Low level: The final task sent by the students is not according to
the requested. The final task loaded lacks of contributions or it is
not sent at the correct environment.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points to 7
points

You might also like