You are on page 1of 11

Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip with Partial Stroke

Safety Manual
In Accordance with IEC 61508

Elliott Company, 901 North Fourth Street, Jeannette, PA 15644


Document number 5046521

Rev No. Issued By Issued Date Remarks


0 James Walsh 8/30/2017 Draft
0.1 James Walsh 9/6/2017 Initial Release
0.2 James Walsh 9/8/2017
0.3 James Walsh 9/11/17 Update Elliott logo, minor formatting
Table of Contents

1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Terms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Product Support ......................................................................................................................... 4
1.4 Related Literature ...................................................................................................................... 4
1.5 Reference Standards ................................................................................................................ 5
2 Product Description ................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Hardware Versions .................................................................................................................... 6
3 Designing a SIF Using a Manufacturer Product .................................................................... 6
3.1 Safety Function .......................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Environmental Limits ................................................................................................................. 7
3.3 Application Limits & Restrictions ............................................................................................. 7
3.4 Design Verification ..................................................................................................................... 7
3.5 SIL Capability.............................................................................................................................. 7
3.5.1 Systematic Integrity ................................................................................................................... 7
3.5.2 Random Integrity ........................................................................................................................ 7
3.5.3 Safety Parameters ..................................................................................................................... 8
3.6 Connection of the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System to the SIS Logic-Solver ........... 8
3.7 General Requirements .............................................................................................................. 8
4 Installation and Commissioning ............................................................................................... 9
4.1 Installation ................................................................................................................................... 9
5.1 Proof Test without Automatic Testing ..................................................................................... 9
5.2 Repair and Replacement ........................................................................................................ 10
5.3 Useful Life ................................................................................................................................. 10
5.4 Manufacturer Notification ........................................................................................................ 11

Page 2 of 11
1 Introduction
This Safety Manual provides information necessary to design, install, verify and maintain
a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) utilizing the Direct Acting Pneumatic Overspeed
Trip System for Elliott YR steam turbines. The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System has
the option of incorporating a Partial Stroke Actuation System.
This manual provides necessary user information and requirements for meeting the IEC
61508 and/or IEC 61511 functional safety standards.
A Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostics Analysis report for the Pneumatic Trip System
is available upon request. See Section 1.3 for Product Support information.

1.1 Terms and Abbreviations


Safety Freedom from unacceptable risk of harm.
Basic Safety The equipment must be designed and manufactured such that it
protects against risk of damage to persons by electrical shock
and other hazards and against resulting fire and explosion. The
protection must be effective under all conditions of the nominal
operation and under single fault condition.
Functional Safety The ability of a system to carry out the actions necessary to
achieve or to maintain a defined safe state for the equipment /
machinery / plant / apparatus under control of the system.
Safety Assessment The investigation to arrive at a judgment - based on evidence -
of the safety achieved by safety-related systems.
Element Part of a subsystem comprising a single component or any
group of components that performs one or more element safety
functions.
Fail-Safe State The State of the process when safety is achieved: De-energized
on fault detection.
Fail Safe Failure that causes the Pneumatic Trip System to go to the
defined fail-safe state without a demand from the process.
Fail Dangerous Failure that does not permit the SIF to respond to a demand
from the process (i.e. being unable to go to the defined fail-safe
state).
Fail Dangerous Undetected Failure that is dangerous and that is not being diagnosed
by automatic diagnostics, such as the Partial Valve Stroke
Testing (PVST).
Fail Dangerous Detected Failure that is dangerous, but is detected by automatic
diagnostics, such as the Partial Valve Stroke Testing.
Fail No Effect Failure of a component that is part of the safety function but that
has no effect on the safety function.
Low demand mode Mode where the safety function is only performed on demand, in
order to transfer the EUC into a specified safe state, and where
the frequency of demands is no greater than one per year and
no greater than twice the proof test frequency.

Page 3 of 11
1.2 Acronyms
EUC Equipment Under Control
FMEDA Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis
HFT Hardware Fault Tolerance
MOC Management of Change - Specific procedures to follow for any
work activities in compliance with government regulatory
authorities or requirements of a standard.
MTTR Mean Time to Repair
PFDavg Average Probability of Failure on Demand
PFH Probability of Failure per Hour
PVST Partial Valve Stroke Testing
SFF Safe Failure Fraction - The fraction of the overall failure rate of
an element that results in either a safe fault or a diagnosed
dangerous fault.
SIF Safety Instrumented Function - A set of equipment intended to
reduce the risk due to a specific hazard (a safety loop).
SIL Safety Integrity Level - Discrete level (one out of a possible four)
for specifying the safety integrity requirements of the safety
functions to be allocated to the E/E/PE safety-related systems
where Safety Integrity Level 4 is the highest level and Safety
Integrity Level 1 is the lowest.
SIS Safety Instrumented System – Implementation of one or more
Safety Instrumented Functions. An SIS is composed of any
combination of sensor(s), logic solver(s), and final element(s).

1.3 Product Support


Product support can be obtained from:

Elliott Company
Industrial Products
901 North Fourth Street
Jeannette, PA 15644
724-527-2811
www.elliott-turbo.com

1.4 Related Literature


Hardware Documents:
• Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System Installation, Operation, and Maintenance
Instructions
• Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System Installation with Partial Stroke Actuation,
Operation, and Maintenance Instructions

Page 4 of 11
Guidelines/References:
• Practical SIL Target Selection – Risk Analysis per the IEC 61511 Safety
Lifecycle, ISBN 978-1-934977-03-3, exida
• Control System Safety Evaluation and Reliability, 3rd Edition, ISBN 978-1-
934394-80-9, ISA
• Safety Instrumented Systems Verification, Practical Probabilistic Calculations,
ISBN 1-55617-909-9, ISA

1.5 Reference Standards


Functional Safety
• IEC 61508: 2010 Functional safety of electrical/ electronic/ programmable
electronic safety-related systems
• IEC 61511:2003 Functional Safety – Safety Instrumented Systems for the
Process Industry Sector (or ISA 84.00.01 if it is more appropriate)

2 Product Description
The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System is an overspeed trip system for steam turbines
with an integral trip valve. A single spring-loaded pneumatic cylinder acts directly on the
trip valve. The cylinder is pressurized to open the valve and depressurized to close the
valve. Two redundant and independently controlled solenoids control the actuation of the
pneumatic cylinder and are de-energized to trip. A quick release valve is used to
increase the speed of the cylinder discharge.
Two solenoid configurations are available:
1oo2 – The independently controlled solenoids are pneumatically configured to be in
series. Only one solenoid needs to de-energize for the system to trip and close the trip
valve.
2oo2 – The independently controlled solenoids are pneumatically configured to be in
parallel. Both solenoids need to de-energize for the system to trip and close the trip
valve.
The Partial Stroke Actuation operates independently by pressurizing the opposing side
of the pneumatic cylinder in a controlled manner to exercise the valve without tripping
the turbine. The Partial Stroke Actuation does not interfere with the overspeed trip
function. The Partial Stroke function can be activated by a local selector switch, or it can
be connected to a DCS for remote activation.
See Installation, Operation, and Maintenance Manual for additional setup and
configuration details.

Page 5 of 11
2.1 Hardware Versions

Table 1 – Pneumatic Trip Assemblies

Assembly Elliott Drg Numbers


UL/FM ATEX/IEC
Pneumatic Trip/ 1oo2 3011403 3011402
Pneumatic Trip w/ Partial
stroke /1oo2 3010890 3006936
Trip w/ PT, 1oo2, 8" valve 3021748 3016609

Pneumatic Trip/ 2oo2 3021749 3021752


Pneumatic Trip w/ Partial
stroke /2oo2 3021750 3021753
Trip w/ PT, 2oo2, 8" valve 3021751 3021754

Table 2 – Pneumatic Trip System Components

Table 3 – Pneumatic Trip System Partial Stoke Components

3 Designing a SIF Using a Manufacturer Product


3.1 Safety Function
When internal dangerous faults are detected, the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System
output moves to its fail-safe state.
When de-energized, the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System moves to its fail-safe
position.
The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System, with or without Partial Stroke Actuation, is
intended to be part of a SIF subsystem as defined per IEC 61508, and the achieved SIL
level of the designed function must be verified by the designer.
The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System operates in low demand mode.
A proof test is required once per year (see section 5.1).

Page 6 of 11
3.2 Environmental Limits
The designer of a SIF must check that the product is rated for use within the expected
environmental limits. Refer to the Elliott Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System Installation,
Operation, and Maintenance (IO&M) Manual for environmental limits.

3.3 Application Limits & Restrictions


The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System is intended for use with Elliott YR steam
turbines or steam turbines of similar design for an overspeed trip shut-off valve.

3.4 Design Verification


A detailed Failure Mode, Effects, and Diagnostics Analysis (FMEDA) report is available
from Elliott Group. This report details all failure rates and failure modes as well as the
expected lifetime. Assumptions made during the FMEDA are listed in the FMEDA report.

The achieved Safety Integrity Level (SIL) of an entire Safety Instrumented Function (SIF)
design must be verified by the designer via a calculation of PFDavg or PFH, considering
safety architecture, proof test interval, proof test effectiveness, average repair time and
the specific failure rates of all products included in the SIF. Each subsystem must be
checked to assure compliance with minimum hardware fault tolerance (HFT)
requirements. The exida exSILentia® tool is recommended for this purpose as it
contains accurate models for the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System and its failure
rates.

The failure rate data listed in the FMEDA report are only valid for the useful lifetime of
Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System. The failure rates will increase sometime after this
time period. Reliability calculations based on the data listed in the FMEDA report for
mission times beyond the lifetime may yield results that are too optimistic, i.e., the
required Safety Integrity Level will not be achieved.

An appropriate MTTR shall be selected based on Elliott and/or plant operation and
maintenance procedures.

3.5 SIL Capability


3.5.1 Systematic Integrity
The product has met manufacturer design process requirements of Safety Integrity Level
(SIL) 3. These are intended to achieve sufficient integrity against systematic errors of
design by the manufacturer. A Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) designed with this
product must not be used at a SIL level higher than the statement without “prior use”
justification by the end user or diverse technology redundancy in the design.

3.5.2 Random Integrity


According to IEC 61508-2, the architectural constraints of an element must be
determined. This can be done by following the 1H approach according to 7.4.4.2 of IEC
61508-2 or the 2H approach according to 7.4.4.3 of IEC 61508-2, or the approach
according to IEC 61511:2016 which is based on 2H.
The 1H approach involves calculating the Safe Failure Fraction for the entire element.

Page 7 of 11
The 2H approach involves assessment of the reliability data for the entire element
according to 7.4.4.3.3 of IEC 61508.
The failure rate data used for this analysis meets the exida criteria for Route 2H which is
more stringent than IEC 61508. Therefore, the Pneumatic Trip System meets the
hardware architectural constraints for up to SIL 2 @ HFT=0 (or SIL 3 @ HFT=1) when
the listed failure rates are used.
As an alternative to establishing architectural constraints via Route 1H or Route 2H, the
user of the Pneumatic Trip System may establish the architectural constraints for an
element using the Pneumatic Trip System per 11.4.5 of IEC 61511-1:2016. In which
case the architectural constraints are SIL 2 @ HFT=0 (or SIL 3 @ HFT=1).

The architectural constraint type for the Pneumatic Trip System is A. The hardware fault
tolerance of the device is 0. The SIS designer is responsible for meeting other
requirements of applicable standards for any given SIL.

3.5.3 Safety Parameters


For detailed failure rate information, refer to the Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic
Analysis Report for the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System.

3.6 Connection of the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System to the SIS Logic-Solver
The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System is to be used in conjunction with a Woodward
Protech GII overspeed trip control or equivalent, and the Woodward 1680-2030 or
equivalent Sensor.

3.7 General Requirements


The system’s response time shall be less than the process safety time. The Direct Acting
Pneumatic Trip System will move to its safe state in less than 0.25 seconds under
specified conditions.
All SIS components, including the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System, must be
operational before process start-up.
User shall verify that the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System is suitable for use in
safety applications by confirming the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System’s nameplate
is properly marked.
Personnel using and performing maintenance and testing on the Direct Acting
Pneumatic Trip System shall be competent to do so. Results from the proof tests shall
be recorded and reviewed periodically.
Steam quality is assumed to be consistent with Table 4. If the steam quality is less than
specified in Table 4, then the reliability of the valve actuation upon demand is reduced
due to potential scale build up. Steam quality less than specified will have a detrimental
effect on the steam valve and valve stem in terms of useful life, and can effect operation
upon demand. The Proof Test interval should be reduced when steam quality is not as
specified.
Clean and dry compressed air, as per ANSI/ISA 7.0.01-1996 is required for reliable
operation. The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip is supplied with a filter/regulator. The filter
regulator should be cleaned and maintained as need. Failure to provide clean, dry
compressed air can have a detrimental effect on the pneumatic components of the
system in terms of useful life, and can effect operation upon demand.
Page 8 of 11
Table 4 – Steam Purity Limits

The steam purity limits for both start-up and continuous operation of steam turbines are
defined in the following table, adapted from Table 9-2 of NEMA SM23-1991 with
Chlorine comment added:

CONTINUOUS STARTUP
CONDUCTIVITY -
O
MICROMHS/CM AT 25 C
DRUM 0.3 1.0
ONCE THROUGH 0.2 0.5

SIO2 (PPB, MAX.) 20 50


FE (PPB, MAX.) 20 50
CU (PPB, MAX.) 3 10
NA + K (PPB, MAX.)
UP TO 800 PSIG (5516 KPAG) 20 20
801 TO 1450 PSIG (5517 TO 9998 KPAG) 10 10
1451 TO 2400 PSIG (9999 TO 16548 KPAG) 5 5
OVER 2400 PSIG (OVER 16548 KPAG) 3 3
CHLORINE (PPB, MAX.) 10 10-30

Notes:
1. TDS (total dissolved solids) 100 ppm, max.
2. Other contaminants should be advised by Purchaser and reviewed by Elliott on an
individual basis.

4 Installation and Commissioning


4.1 Installation
The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System must be installed per standard practices
outlined in the Installation Manual. The environment must be checked to verify that
environmental conditions do not exceed the ratings.
The Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System location and placement must be accessible for
physical and/or visual inspection and allow for manual proof testing.
4.2 Connections
Compressed air provided to the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System must be clean dry
instrument quality air as per ANSI/ISA 7.0.01-1996.

5 Operation and Maintenance


5.1 Proof Test without Automatic Testing
The objective of proof testing is to detect failures within the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip
System that are not detected by any automatic diagnostics of the system. Of main
concern are undetected failures that prevent the Safety Instrumented Function (SIF)
from performing its intended function.

Page 9 of 11
The frequency of proof testing, or proof test interval, is to be determined in reliability
calculations for the safety instrumented functions for which the Direct Acting Pneumatic
Trip System is applied. The proof tests must be performed at least as frequently as
specified in the calculation in order to maintain the required safety integrity of the safety
instrumented function.
The following proof test is recommended. The results of the proof test should be
recorded, and any failures that are detected and that compromise functional safety
should be reported to Elliott.

Table 5 – Recommended Proof Test

The suggested Proof Test consists of a full stroke of the Pneumatic Trip System

Step Action
1 Disconnect driven load from turbine.
2 Send a signal to the Pneumatic Trip System to force the Actuator/Valve
assembly to the Fail-Safe state and confirm that the Safe State was achieved
(See Note 1).
3 Inspect the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System for any visible damage or
contamination.
4 Record any failures in your company’s SIF inspection database.
5 Close steam pressure isolation valve and allow steam pressure to bleed off.
6 Reconnect driven load and reset Pneumatic Trip Valve.
Note 1. For the test to be determined as effective, the turbine must reduce the speed to
500 RPM within 15 minutes.
This test will detect 95% without PVST and 93% with PVST of possible DU (Dangerous
Undetected) failures in the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System.
The person(s) performing the proof test of a Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System should
be trained in SIS operations, including bypass procedures, valve maintenance and
company Management of Change procedures.
It is recommended that a physical inspection (Step 3 from Table 5) be performed on a
periodic basis with the time interval determined by plant conditions. A maximum
inspection interval of one year is recommended.

5.2 Repair and Replacement


Repair procedures in the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System Installation, Operation,
and Maintenance manual must be followed.

5.3 Useful Life


The useful life of the Direct Acting Pneumatic Trip System is three to five years.

Page 10 of 11
5.4 Manufacturer Notification
Any failures that are detected and that compromise functional safety should be reported
to Elliott customer service.

Elliott Company
Industrial Products Division
901 North Fourth Street
Jeannette, PA 15644
724-527-2811
www.elliott-turbo.com

Page 11 of 11

You might also like