Vehicle Automation—Other Road User

Communication and Coordination:

Theory and Mechanisms

PRESENTATION BY
GUIDED BY
LAKSHMI C R HARIKRISHNAN V
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR SCM17EE018
EEE DEPARTMENT S7/EEE

DATE:12/11/2020
INTRODUCTION::
 Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I)

 Vehiclesand users communicate and exchange data with

random untrusted entities

 Use of mechatronics and artificial intelligence to assist a

vehicle's operator.

 Intelligent or smart 1
STRUCTURE::
 Hardware
• Sensors
• V to V and V to I technology
• Actuators
 SOFTWARE
Processes for
• Percepyion
• Planning
2
• control
 KEY COMPONENTS::
 Sense the road

 Map the road

 Negotiate your place on the road

3
BLOCK DIAGRAM

4
The Basic Safety Message
 Primary message set to send data between vehicles.

 Speed

 Heading angle

 Position etc…

5
Technology Implementation
 Device must know its own position

 Computer processing unit

 Transmit this message wirelessly to another

vehicle

6
 A GPS antenna and receiver.

 Security module

 Communication medium is necessary.

 Dedicated Short Range Communication

7
 Up to 1km

 Supports data rate of up to 27Mbps

 Comprisesa 5MHz guard band, one 10MHz Control

Channel (CCH) and six 10 MHz Service Channels
(SCHs).

8
 DSRC
(Dedicated short-range communications)

 Dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) are one-way or two-way short-range to

medium-range wireless communication channels specifically designed for automotive use and
a corresponding set of protocols and standards.

9
D S R C (Dedicated Short Range Communication)

 Reliability

 Secure data transmission

 Low latency.

10
VEHICLES COMMUNICATING EACH OTHER

In vehicular communication network types, the

transferred information contains warning messages 11
and traffic information.
VEHICLE TO INFRASTRUCTURE

12
13
Example crosswalk negotiation between a
vehicle and pedestrian in a road context.

14
PHYSICL IMPLEMENTATION

15
16
ADVANTAGES:::

 Traffic moving efficiently

 Improve drive time and vehicle safety.

 Congestion is greatly reduced.

 People are more mobile.

 People get where they need to go faster—and more safely.

17
 REFERENCES:
1. P. D. Norton, Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. Cambridge, MA, USA:
MIT Press, 2008.
2. S. Singh, ‘‘Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national motor vehicle crash causation survey,’’
Nat. Highway Traffic Saf. Admin., Washington, DC, USA, Rep. DOT HS 812 115, 2015.
3. L. Bainbridge, ‘‘Ironies of automation,’’ Automatica, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 775–779, Nov. 1983.
4. M. R. Endsley and E. O. Kiris, ‘‘The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in
automation,’’ Hum. Factors, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 381–394, Jun. 1995.
5. N. B. Sarter, D. D. Woods, and C. E. Billings, ‘‘Automation surprises,’’ in Handbook of Human Factors
and Ergonomics, G. Salvendy, Ed., 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1997, pp. 1926–1943.
6. O.FeldmanhallandA.Shenhav,‘‘Resolvinguncertaintyinasocialworld,’’ Nature Hum. Behav., vol. 3, no. 5,
pp. 426–435, May 2019.
7. M. Sucha, D. Dostal, and R. Risser, ‘‘Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked
crossings,’’ Accident Anal. Prevention, vol. 102, pp. 41–50, May 2017.
8. P. Koopman and M. Wagner, ‘‘Challenges in autonomous vehicle testing and validation,’’ SAE Int. J.
Trans. Saf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–24, Apr. 2016.
9. O. Inbar and N. Tractinsky, ‘‘The incidental user,’’ Interactions, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 56, 2009.
10. E. Montague and O. Asan, ‘‘Trust in technology-mediated collaborative health encounters: Constructing
trust in passive user interactions with technologies,’’ Ergonomics, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 752–761, Jul. 2012.
11. A. Shariff, J.-F. Bonnefon, and I. Rahwan, ‘‘Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving
vehicles,’’ Nature Hum. Behav., vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 694–696, Oct. 2017.
P. K. Piff, D. M. Stancato, S. Cote, R. Mendoza-Denton, and D. Keltner, ‘‘Higher social class predicts
12.

increased unethical behavior,’’ Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 4086–4091, Mar. 2012. 18
THANKYOU