Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Accounting Standards: IAS 7 Cash Flow Statements
International Accounting Standards: IAS 7 Cash Flow Statements
Operating Activities
It is recognised that, although an enterprise may
have generated a profit during the year and increased
its assets, it may not necessarily create readily
accessible cash as the money could be tied up in
stocks, debtors etc. Also, in arriving at profit a number
of non-cash deductions and additions have been
included e.g. depreciation. These need to be taken
Background into account when calculating the actual cash
This article (the third in the series) covers one of the generated.
major primary statements published by reporting Similarly to FRS 1, IAS 7 permits two methods of
entities – the cash flow statement. calculating operating cash flows – the direct and the
The income statement and the balance sheet of an indirect methods. However, FRS 1 insists that the
enterprise show important aspects of its performance indirect method be compulsorily adopted with the
and position. However, users of financial statements direct method being treated as an optional extra.
are also interested in how the enterprise generates There is complete freedom of choice in IAS 7. The
and uses its cash resources. In particular, users are indirect method requires the profit to be reconciled to
concerned about the overall solvency and liquidity of the cash flow being generated by operations. This is
the enterprise. carried out using the same methodology in FRS 1 by
adjusting the operating profit for non cash movements
IAS 7 is designed to aid users in that regard and in the income statements and for movements in
requires a cash flow statement to be drawn up working capital. The detail can be seen in the
summarising the cash flows during a period. Unlike specimen format below. The direct method, on the
FRS 1 it merely classifies cash flows into three other hand, identifies the actual cash receipts from
separate sections: customers and the actual cash payments to suppliers
a) Operating activities and employees. Both methods lead to the same
b) Investing; and figure. It is very unlikely that many Irish companies
c) Financing would adopt the direct method as it requires the
segregation of VAT from the cash receipts and cash
FRS 1 required the publication of nine separate payments during the year. This would probably be
headings. However, IAS 7 makes no attempt to expensive in terms of system changes as the
specifically segregate tax flows, dividends received accounting programmes are geared to identify VAT at
from associated companies, returns on investments the point of purchase or point of sale, not at point of
and servicing of finance nor the management of liquid cash receipts/payments. In addition the indirect
resources. It also fails to separate out capital method does provide a useful link between the
expenditure flows from those involving acquisitions operating profit as disclosed in the income statement
and disposals. with the cash actually derived from operations.
Another major difference between FRS 1 and IAS 7 Cash flows arising from taxes on income are
is the treatment of short term investments. In FRS 1 normally classified as operating unless they can be
these are normally regarded as liquid resources and specifically identified with financing or investing
are effectively included as a separate heading in the activities.
financing section of the statement. Under IAS 7 these
are classified as cash equivalents and are added to the The direct method is illustrated below and the
increase in cash and cash equivalents at the bottom of indirect method is illustrated in the overall specimen
the statement (as per the original version of FRS 1). format:
35
Financial Repor ting IAS
The net cash flow from operating activities of 1,560 may be arrived at by
adopting the direct method as shown below:
36