You are on page 1of 9
an Grounded Theory Research This chapter will give you information on: | what grounded theory esearch is the rol and comtnts of the grounded th e unde theory methodology > ways ofperirming groundes tery researen tne key concepts usd in the groundea theory appro > ne storia and contemporary developments of grounded heey search? What is grounded theory The grounded theory approach bas wide wse And apply, andi ta ‘clined is poston within usnets cier Crounded teary mize fen Sed eo er fo any posse approseh that ert develop theoretical es, ‘nove peel hence modes, acting fom the dat However, hi Yama Conception of grounded theory a1» het pure veoion of “nducve theory ~ {ac the theory emerges by tu Tree fom the dat, He ip eve emerge from bls in spring el= is wrong and doesnot do jus ro the rounded theory spproch (rounded theory tls boi othe method and he nd elt of he eh proces: Grounded theory methodology cons of» sei x of proces {or caing ou the bik madle-range sory fom and ih be Bp of he Speete pce roid gueosnens send ond no evel hea hat Wi buns enue sh cer he eco cd in aero deve theory daring theres roc, wheat The spec procedure eam ‘ose kinds of dato peti ene cares tn tie ch not 1 mere meno oe ecnigue fo qubave shee se they in apcon in reach a ore bir 0¥8 play “hehe of rounded ear hs been ged oi, Faby fs ndtv pcp Te gs, oes nd ty devel vd hen epoch ndmetadlogy esl, however been at Ruyeinldtince Undying heed ofthe 1960s {baby detocl ence wet doin te cede Rey ipictad etd! spout and th es fhe grouded theory prone arr hee tte ees ie ong ven Ce developments eS Jin seeds ron sumption conering the ne Tbowaeceson nrc ’ “focnter of rounded theory spc, Bay Gin 0 Are Sei nthe oak Pe uve of Gren Pa (Gn! Ses, 1M rome aac teory wth ne lnpcodetcve peach, by ing tai Fa gh othe seg swe gnc he whole proce of hae Se ee par waleoed sais a aly enn dhe cee seeet tng cote pounded henry seve, hear eves aig aca aa eens trough cemanaurerpaybeween aay ahd it ‘Sineut ou and Covi, 1988 158) ig Grounded theory es0aren and teary Buna * Todi, the we of grounded theory methalog? has ead and found i recut methodloty sid, fr exile i= ce sade and fn was fi {ecit scene, busines seach nso. makeing ese, grounded trey of consumes tsps to averting (2 Hinehman 34 Thompson tus rope inereting rela ane orewed an undensanding of eonvumee Iehavou Consumer experience nd consume: behavous, 38 well a yuck s tur behaviour, ea Geld fr he grounded theory approach i feeuich td especialy in marketing evexch eg. Howton ad Venkata ‘Souling 1998. 200. "The grounded theooy agprosch hs ako gained = thal in seus entenip wae (eg Tuer, 1988) and in epic din "M0 And pounded shen widely wed inte dy of technologie tnt egpniaiona change (rown and Esennd 1997). Beamgles of Sr pouned theory in nance tvewch, scouting and management (tee pplcoions of grounded theory ¢ budgeing and <0 the re Sadmthents Josie (988), for means. whe exined Cruawk-oergn and feobaon (1989), in fea cama st NEMOOSOUAIAT Wu CE Se : conning tsa ned died pcs heptane «the key and the tools for producing 2 theory of social phenomena through the ana ey sere tae mers te tn rere Founded theory methodology employs various sppresches and logic in deve the theory: it uses both induction and deduction, In addition, ves ind theory development is regarded as important. ae) ra a tayo snd evolves ding the seach process due the conan ove ad inery snd Stauss, 1990; Straus and Corbin, 1998; Charmaz, 1990, 2000) The ifr Trader aay sow alk whether cis enive roca nt de rand Seley the grounded theory approach resis in 2 sabia uence Lenco she rounded theory approach 3 ober, sucha tinognghc he decled deception of mateal and sting ae undeotondng ey euteame ofthe esech Fhe evarch seg nd empire fen the voc or theory of ome par of empires Te Losses renee eset fs examples of roune theory spcons orn maskeing snd eoumer suis tan from ladesip ¢ acounng sks ‘The sees fon hr mig be thar the epatenie antmpions inchs 0 Be fire move dapened aed do note 0 el int grounded theory asamp, composed wh epntene avumpions win makeing theory. THs might be veo ely wot the nly one. We ho ea ted tory apron Sot changed ov the ions dn eet ache fe explanation for the diflerences, tobe inco acount tat the rou yom and new formulins sober to diferent ss Tolawing, we wil tke look both a the anginal “The erga suds and thinking sbowt grou sing obec sumptions embedded in ponivisn, 2 rn posopy of eros cea in he pose oi xy is folowing const arch done within ound theory #8) Chama, 2003, 2000 : ‘The iene becween the pounded hee FPN! ier neon in ycusiveapreche 6 dx for x2. 7 re ina ut ho even mote profen ao aol ning abort ke nd psio ofan a ons psii athens et te wee te te yd wb xed ts SPAN fo bins ese tens of ‘ne rationale of grounded theory methodology tas been the abject of 3 8, he case sudy satel ing ay hte on coe dee (lan nd Sea ie, alan, 199% Vin, 1994: Seas A i arene dts an theory, wat the scroll approahes and BoM “Cuno need ee cae 07 1967, Sena, 1987; wn Me Tosti, 1998, aid on thee of how 1 Te tinmpreaion, when co te various ee ice sprees. Vey fin tt cr ern an npr 9 Cas a appeal wich OT providing denqnns ox esig hoes Bu GAG pons tac teary generson, pounded xo mend 8 we s ‘rye pounded heory 2ppcich is dewdoped for theonsng om the tec inh the el 2th foaled and dsspve method a ne fe cng: the empha on he fon coding proce ahd Was meres Since da ali as evoked ef etic Gm may ecg cin 1996), For tome reach stings nd each Gh ra J ccudology might prove Co be wil, wheres rote it 2 Cae pods ond tet irene, aso good to lam 38008 ee iy ave been wie inspec tse eg, For hi ‘Mangler hinds of pubbesios i wei Te etme of pounded weary approach ot ext a 36 enn soap ee band ge, + consequence of wot tas daw tie a a pe ong sexs peered by Glee and Sena (1963 ee a funher dabei een wae ac items de eore Gunc 993, 2003, Corin an Sens (190) sn SHS asap oven Dierences ext i both spe and i the tei (oP8 ooh develope she supa method with eave Om ae ae aime, which wa a aly seeped by Gist (192). ‘Sik nehod developsnen ave turned many eer took by Glee and Set (1967) The te tenon in the method development ato the mcr of whether grounded theory ean be (Gont.D Yc wil ake ep some ards of method development dicuson twd the end ofthis chapter ft, te wl Snroduce the bse soc, Key concep and ‘Sens of grounded teary methodology and give eunples of how grounded serrehodology bas been sed ad implemented in buses seach secing, {Reo taeaion in tht chaps els both onthe orgtl ess pcted by Cla Thy Ein (1967) and ler developmest by Seu and Corin (1998, and ao we temas by Glaser (1992, 202), she diferences ee nora fo he re a anus procedure ofthe dt ein the ater work by Sta and Cota ‘Seti and Straus. 1990; Straus and Corbin, 1999) et ee cosing procedce (Seexcnded into open coding. axial coding and selective coding, of which ey ine intone eomites coding work mov ofen undestod in gunive FTF LS] SORTA The catnip eter ety nee KU grounds tery aporoaen [arose pounded haar approach was dovocpe by Baey Sasso Mra Sere ants bata iin aie te feseim Srauss ne 19008 ee enearcandopanstigeo-ducie | SRERESING Spare tne te and oe of ruth — oF teary = research meorang et ean he 0 yon wo etioms. aad oe eset on Sa oa, gored, songy exagenies race pelea ah ee doar te posss nde e003 mes seing scence a con. Tey 9 ok hl a aie echt ine oman ore oak he roesnet Gost 0/024 | en tetera re) mamaneapeere ste! scant catagories em (laser and Sass, ans aaa saa es abate over the wae Whi so ete et gong ne owe a 8 psn 0 Be Shamed noseareh fs impart ote atte go-calee cal tn unine? eseet le ghuceopy of sens an socal Soares Nad 8 pine wn no oral eas found wey wets cemoped Fete cere eye cfgnal ers, ise (902, 2002) and aes rob, Sues an Car (120) arr ones ta asa ppocctes Oevcupments and addons ie grounded Men Sacnacn Pointe dren fhe oat tony 1. Moe eae amano const opproas 9 Caras, 200, 2003, 2008), have ben a Key elements and processes Ho does theory emerge tam data analysis? “he gounded theory approach pest cera. eel ec ean ou whee cvlping theory Gom ata much dv oe aaa eromens died, Theeopenon. sain lent 20d de Key aoa ee ror pred teow Again, Sus (990) ad Sei a CSE nr tropes sigh sng eenoor te aes of a reso tana lexinporan to exp min tht theo ie the sn oa, an a pratace ou more aol os pocedure whee le ede (ebemeningandundensnding in he produson of theo we yal de rounded theory avast wandenaning hx is 0 pay indore Reap, ba aves as pecs of qu (nico, ein ven ep Racodng to Seu (1,197, ol Ure apecu ate een but tl cant se son onheur vernon ot salina of hypothe ot of TEARS aConing to hina esr? nq. Veneaon, fe a cant OME Uigourdeduedon ned epecence wi dud for i pat goers soup, bypadeor encase qetons, There dxtioormed qussion ae den se erro de genecton oh sere, Glee ad Sau (1967) Ieptmend the abduction es by Cher Pare, whos concep of abdoeton srScre emptor om th le ofexpenenc inthe it pass of esetch prac, sacactneepmci nthe method ceelopmen oppesed Severn the oo fia ta a her coon: Clas 192) heed he emp tat Cosi {Sua (1990; uaa and Coin, 1998) icon venieacon. According to Glee {thay tele vet louie he ong es of rounded ery hie Should oboe dicovery a ipo or herb not hou venation Grounded tery methodlogy in pve quis & ete aa ssp, bic in oso he nethod of cones corepereone tam trea npn in empl eer? Empire inno Gm the at sh 8 ‘Sen or scons or cies tha ave Sen obieved nd wet ie Som oftaning tr nu nel dence ues a a tf coment camputon, Yous ether vl be she eae crergng torino ndcaen a i aa coll cagoy 1 concept. Then you wil be abl compas thre Coe the enprcl auicnon' sed ss wi ach ck oe ona ‘clans th defedon of cone ad propery Re a regi ems ote milking eee Sete snd Corbin, 1998). [CT esha etn re hap th pom eh he concrnanieu of concept, nd the explortion of the ena ce there propoion hesgh dora oy Eee ean you eed od ange proce, sd the vetsnon the eal ur METHODS UALTAVEWUSHSS EAR egies sal known a theoreti coding, The proces of theo codig $iberbed in detail by Glsce (1978) and Saause and Corbin (1998). Theoey- evelopment shas kes place in immediate ‘come’ with che dts: the claunea “taars ever present inthe grounded theory approach, “Theory development does aot end wih thi, but esting af emeaget theory pidedby teres sampling, Theoceia umpliagmeans in practice that the ampling ff adions advises or evens i dected by the evolving theoretical eonstuce, CComparsons beowcen the explanacoryadeguicy of the theoreialconseues and these addtional empirical indieacors go on unt eheortel saturation is eiched (Gherand Straus, 1967; Stas, 1990). Inchis way, the eevskingtheory sconidered to be concepruay dense, slid and grounded in the dit. And thi is he sim of {posnded thant reach & core exegory dat adequately explaine the phenomenon, Snder investigation The reexamination of dats throughout the esearch project the unl proce ure in mow qualadve research, However, few qualitative rsutch methodologies fee the rscucher to systematic connection bung berween ego tat im for theory Balding. Glsier and Stu (1967) and ako Seuss (1990) emphasise ‘he complex nature of social phenomena, Thi the reaton why rounded theory ‘nehodology emphasizes she need fr developing many coneepe and syemacaly shape iv onde o ‘cause » great dal ofthe varston tat chaeicenes ena ued! (Suau, 1990.7) In that sense, che rounded theory sh when aiming fo sheoryconsnstion: the sms ion ofthe materia. This aim ‘we will ere bck tater the thick description or has alo provoked enticism, whi Ceang of cata as an ezzentia\ elemant ofthe analysis ‘The seal clement force grounded theory methodology i teeing ps ofthe a. Why he cong 1 iporant? Thi zed othe more gener queions (of how and in what ways the researcher iver athe integrons made in che ‘ultivereierc, and how syematizaly thee incerpreuons ae being mad ‘According o the grounded theory apptoach, »suemati way of working ih the ds 3nd memo waiting can give Ae explanation of wa ix done and how the ‘onclasionsate reached nthe esearch, fthisproces, the cosing ofa iimportant Saas snd Corti (1998) ae more explicit shout se coding pocedue,theeire ‘becoming ethaps more popula in vc since than the eter version by Ghee and Stat (1967 ‘The coding proces inthe grounded theory approach coms of thee eyes of ing op, ela id ela coupuing and exgocing the dc. Open coin is he rif nde sey debs noc ang pe fa hed Ca Vn, cache you ihc wh fd Hey ei cee ang hc pen cong procs Ope ong on xa wih mebyne api Iryou ne» cr sec, os ead ae ated af ede hat arene cer ead 0 ich 9 iach even nl wndentaning fe materials Cig dhe di cae Te a! way of taming so How che dc, This once ll ulin da imap eoaing Al rent, pocnes oF inh gute ah bly o cont casi, in oct a et peopent The nese the open coding oc ane teveg sinus and Coin, 1996-25-27) 4 Aalal coding bp you o move 3 highs ech level nab Meee na nal coding, you nigh be ered i nding in crite ture ened ech otern ore nomappn way A “seth prany om cscepon nd oman inking codes together, vKhcrspccecd whi enpanon pe, sl woe you WAY theory conscion e Chmos, 2008) Ganges bought Stat heaph a with ip of il coding. ar rser concep at hve wes exis poet nd combines the idences occuring at a ‘Safed mca the compan med Sfstonsnt wont Teese pte nary wont eoneep Stine: prea hr cmcep ot uc on to cy a oct weds and God’ wong sed sch nthe ne coovrsein ene rape Conan cone 4 i Shep reengineered ci cone i wdc you coer oe nwt fp ome incon) ea toe ahr ne) 2, Fanty nected inepueandvine yout aa tm ‘homie tne cong you ee on aera beh ey. ah coer pees ear ‘The oxiginal sim for theory building in the grounded theory 4 sli the ai ofthe analysis and retaech proce in gener is om ¢ Ss reenpion, The proe of avicton meu ta hee iterated ito» conceteiycinlen iterated theory (Sau 1898), Glee (1978) wats esezcher fom forcing the daa int Hg coves he ere 0 2 ange of pote casing ae oF EMBs § te eqully valid che interpresmon, at een gy gE ee ee ene ee sr ria and ion acm Tee Goremost ms pare of the relic eadtion of methodology, and ante eee ee ecient erences rere sf epee eon an ren fee Charmer, 2006) mi basic steps in the analysis ‘Tae previous pat othe chaper has oudine the bsicideat and key conceps behind pounded sheory thinking, What ir sec a important in rounded theory i Bat ie Yoree’ you a the researcher to think in both snlycal and conceptual ways the am co move fom description ro prescription, a mentioned cater. Ar the base nepe for grounded theory analyse mow efen poorly decabed (ds to et amply in eseach eles, oue sim iso inexoduce them here tthe nor peer level From reading he busi den ofthe grounded theory approach above, you should beynow havea reisively well developed ds ofthe main am of esearch Uned onthe ‘sounded theory approsch The research question is formulated tn any quire euch: the retenth gueson can bein de fom ofa satement that iene the Pinomenon tobe siege els the rede of your esearch reper of your ow Init ele and the four of your study In developing ad refining the rerereh question, Ge’ views dir fom bose of Sirs (1990) and Stasi and Cosi (1998) Inthe owing petnation, ‘Se onal sens by Give ane Sera (1967 nd te ate development by Stat sa sad Corb (1998) ae aken up. Despite dhe ler developments nn the method discussion the process desebedin his haper rch (eg O'Callaghan, 1996) ‘Seas and Corbin (1998) have emphasized hee myjoc bie before Inte grounded theony 39920 ja the esearcher needs to consider h the weep "Chase nave ae: choosing problem: and sng begining the eeverehinguiy the reat quenion: antaning 2 bance berween objectivity and sensitiv, ad ing the hteraate. These ‘ult’ rezemble mos standard ideas fo any wer shoud maintains balance been objectives good Suis and Covbin (1998 53) i levant be the resenrcher have conse that fon ofthe problem uner seach processexcup. That ‘lea long at objectvy 1 defined by in you esearch projet ‘object en ‘vor her findings ace» ceatonabe, ipa preset imvesigacon’ Even if ts wetl inthe pounded chery approach, thi re pple to vnon forme of quaiaive sai that have curve, parative poseoderacemens,wheretequcsion of obec a Fin The econo development in rounded ry 0 th esi (eg Chama 2006). “That boa eniy, mentioned above? Seni ia hos in te gene ie, tve ening. Inthe pounded he settee mes at os venga ae be 0 ge fo he oven in inion in the ay of dat leads (0 Ind evading ah experince, men ave nts concerning te Jone enol expences ko ang been 3 enon Toijng your oe erpnaten cn ncens esi, bt an bo lock oe ‘eters “According € the bai ide of grounded theory, once the area of has been defined, te rearher should eater ehe research Geld celaively Consequeny the eae consulted a pr ofthe terive snd continuing of da colection, simultaneous anaes snd emergene interpretation. Liter eral gathering oe sey, feading shoul! nut cee the empl fn enghten the eee fn tie flowing. the procedure (or dicoverng, verifnng and Cs rounded theogy inthe rset phe wil be deterived, a that see aint alps The coleting of or organising dase seen athe way 6 aganize iat which emerge fr the eearcher during the analy of data, tn the ‘heory approach, concep and tra ce uted hae ce pecially elated 0 of dong the analy. The mos import ones at sted i Box 11.2 Be Bf Soc112 a ronan or ama oT aa according to Strauss. "4 Sats (1090:23) has condenses he somone he man poco 1. te covsaptindieator mass ion a 2. gaia colecton| 2 coding 4 core catagories 5. thooretical samping 5 comparisons @ 8 0. ine casing ‘hooratical saturation ‘ntogation ofthe theory theoratical memos theoretical song. ns ean be found, for example, in Ses (1990) a Susu and Cok “The most important activity in grounded cheory methodolony i the ell poss, which consins of three types: open, axial and civ coding “oding i teem for conceptualizing daa, According o Strutt (1990; 20) coding includ faing questions and giving provisional anwers (hypotheses) about estegores sal thei telaions. A code is the tem for any posible product of ti ana, From the data to codes ‘Open couting, # mentioned sbove, is abou uncovering, naming ad develop conceps snd exsgores by opening up the text (Box 11.3). In open coding, break te dst dowa into diserece pars, examine them clorely and compuce te loess and dilerenees (e.g Stas and Corbin, 1998) You cn do he o the Git et impor o remember that chese concept and cher dimensions, di sage enstely provisional. The open coding practice is 4 good way lear fo know your ena, aad more ofan i done in any quaiaive data ana fit stp 0 get to now the daa, offen without being the precede 3 open ceding down theoreti questions og can be seen 2b 4 sptematc way in which the researcher pu Teypothesen and 2 summary of codes n order Rep | Box 11.3 How to do open cosing Thewe are several deiaied guidelines and lengthy examples 10 be (ound Trewacce (1900) end ic Strauss and Corin (1090), for example, These (gudeines can be put ino general rules of thumb for open cong: 1. The fst ue of thumb sto ask of the data 2 set of questions tat eae Into your orginal eaearen fea 2 Tae ecced ue of um is to ask me question of what category we are Tating avout when a speciicincident found tho tx : a ene oeeline ie alco to anaioe te data minutely. Tie produces 1 ee otras wich mani nat be needed or he whole of he (ota materals, 4 The out ue ofthe gen by Sua bck and rethink’ re that is wmpertant for a9 au tec unded taory approach ns cated theortea! mom aus isthe more genera Yan tai analysis. no wang rack of est nd codes Appin, memo wring it good ‘eather throughout the eset proces, but specifically (a wome other qultacive methods, memo wating could be an ‘Open coding of a fin ides of the data and i abo venes individ eoses, Seu (990) emai thot he cescarcher shuld wae ated othe inal coder achieved rough open coding. a open €O@ing Jrodace hundied codes. From » gene! qualitative reseaci pint of EW Ping about developing Ent the theoectcl tool for indexing, letng the dat, That noc enough, though “Spe coding it flowed by axial coding. Axl coding consis of analy of one category 32 sn, and resis in new and cumoladive dove extegries and thei eetions. Axial eading ao can ake place ding the pmofthc open coding when subexegoi inked inc aegis. Inthe aa Pehing proces, you put togetner the dain new ways. The aim ofthis execite ‘Shee calc connesions between catepors and subcategories, be able to Bd 8 Bote detloped rfl pice of lssonships or explanations that exist i eaion whe das rad the ees quenion. Aual coding makes you think and rt urd in mew was and eebtes the euitsof che open coding in ways which meni inal. ‘as Sass and Conn (198: 125) have sated, even ithe text provides stout how categories (om open coding) elite to each ott the atu ‘ike place oe desspvely, ut ether at» concepel level, There ae evo lev Staal king place (he acs worse used by the eppanden inthe ese Iewiew dia wad) and () our conepsa. Zao ofthese wots, which i erection ofthe evens ofthe inden decrsed im the text ow 6 you Ja sl coding fom me rx mater? Gencely, you should feranswerstoquetions techs why or bow cone where, when how ad fii ng restora ameng tex andinsodeing, yout ces by coneepeatizing the phenomenos “The tsa with axl coding (9 Gcliace the Unking of beatepo thei epee etegorer Nota ubcregones eon be easly exegorzed onions, contents or conequencet of cxegon7 im many caer dt Fatonshijs beween the phenomenon and causa condone are mot the dia and, scoring &0 Barney Cle should not be forced i the ‘her (liner, 1992: 123) Se nd Corin (1998. 9) are af erent Concerning tit aking procs while Glue sess import to cus hone catego tha emerged om the ebered stuscons, Seu 3nd Important to lok al asad i ici canegoin, inal selective coding is sbout integrating and efiing He from the mor eaegoe selecting one core category co FON 8 shine oe ny ms te fs ind hich a ter ee MUTATE RUNES NSERC Saupe. Some wut prefer cute the tm ex hig these rw tens, 9 you shouldbe swat feheckng cen you me ng Spremiacly ughow Your ech Apia disp te ab eee ee ‘There teoninoloy doesnot have al onsstency. ‘Valdtin it dane by generating hypothe elon between cater and wing dats from the field to text thete hyptheis. Categories way be een nd eorgnied in the completion of he teary, Kein tha proce wher ea “Become the theory. The move from decaption to concepaeaion seedy samine merot (tru and Cochin, 199) ‘We seed she imporance of memos eae inthis chapter, Wha he oe cf memos isthe grounded theory spproich and special in eon to cog roca? Memes have an important ale in the aay eiping trodes ten fms umbee of xtegone though geneningeasonips ad wertng tome mote ineraive ramneworks. Mem ie cot inthe henry geneaing proce, seelng fo Glee (1978); and a hey have an inponane fle, cee hey thould be wraen and generated simultaneously wah he na calecton sd sa, Innis: ion, many grate reruch mathode mention ce mporance ‘ath Gage tn grounded theory sever nsncions ave een pen conning fhe oe and writng ap of memos, induding dnc sch 3 memo Wong fin’ and ‘ways pe peony to smemoing (Miles and Huberman, 1996 4), eno bep i eng ices. tore al Chnking. elton, the ans is insted of “concep From easing theory ‘Theobjeeove ofseletive coding italic explicate the ory by fing ening) tape tong oregon ec cae. Aho wincen? Some races finde eer to we te sve wil you fd thee eon? 5 “eto t el enving out he core eon “The cone ection proces took ot te cone in daranet ones among thm an tet andeiing proper nd process) inane to proceed to thor tatemens (or they lig Exe ihe moteur eine ven foul tre, reso Your i, Acodig Soman Cori 198 27), onde hay gene etal,» ‘tng sue coping daphne oat 8 we 2 li snaiet Coding a ich, tees, doe Secipehe core gory a which “atc te asec come ot hee oud te ound theory approach ben 1 ure, he jor ‘ave! ounded theory aay thi he nay tn sae he ice nis eh on eng Tends tothenny develope areca {ode wihou expning how te code te ed 98,200 and even to theory mes he pO (19%), oly when he ory a mace, of when dhe, Would heres ew the wo in he ld ete Shoup the ition oie A you ean ely ace Eom hs to ntoducon to the soprch this comply inthe ae proecs ad the ovetep

You might also like