Strengths:

This journal is complete example of how the journal shoukd be. The arrangement of every subs makes
the readers understand well. One thing that becomes a strong point of this is the researchers give the
related studies to their study. There are so many studies that discuss about how the gender is revealed
in textbook. Those theories really support the researchers study to be done and need a wide attention
from people especially the ones who are responsible in making or creating textbook, considering that
the equal gender in textbook should be watched and fixed if there is something inappropriate to the
stabilization of gender scale. The use of 8 factor procedures by Amerian and Esmaili in forming the
results makes it more easy to understand and let the readers know about some procedure that can
define the gender scale.

Weaknesses:

This journal clearly showed that it doesn't have a general results of all gender problem in textbook. It
could be the researchers didn't do far research related to whether their study will go deeply er not
about gender. Or maybe, they have done, but don't get the best answer for the readers about the
general problem of all gender cases in textbook. That was unfortunate thing that it should be more than
that to be able to satisfy the readers.