Professional Documents
Culture Documents
::::-
-
::i!
c
0
:;:;
40 e THR
0 TKR
~ 35 --- HRof 1.0
J!!
.!:
iii 30
...
'6
~
0 25
>-
E
...
.E 20
~
IX
-
J:
~
0
15
!.'!!
10
...
"0
Ill
~
J:; 5
...
"0
Q)
Vl
0
:J
'6'
<(
0 8 16 24 32 40 48
Time since surgery in weeks
2 Item: 1 of 6 l lf' Mark <::] t>-
Q. ld : 10092 [ Previous Next
3
4
5
6 iii 30
...
'6
~
0 25
>.
...E
-
.E 20
0:::
:I:
~
15
0
:0:
I!!
10
.,...
"0
til
.c 5
...
"0
Cll
VJ
::s 0
-- -· --------------- .•. ---------- - - -- .
'6"
<(
0 8 16 24 32 40 48
Based on the study results and assuming statistical significance, w hich of the follow ing provides the best
explanation to the patient?
r A. Although there is no risk of heart attack immediately following surgery, the risk increases after
hospital discharge.
r B. There is an increased risk of heart attack after surgery, w hich is best explained by risk factors and
comorbidities.
r C. There is an increased risk of heart attack right after surgery, but it returns to baseline after 4 w eeks.
r D. There is an increased risk of heart attack up to approximately 8-10 w eeks after the surgery.
r E. There is no substantial proof that the surgery is associated w ith a higher risk of heart attack.
-
1
3
4
5
6
'
Item: 2 of 6
Q. ld: 9991 [
l lf' Mark <::]
Previous
t>-
Next
A research group is studying a new biomarker for prostate cancer screening in a random sample of
asymptomatic men >50 years of age. As the majority of prostate cancers are slow ly progressive, the
investigators are concerned that the benefits of the new screening tool w ill be overestimated due to detection
of a disproportionate number of slow ly progressive, benign cases. The research group is most likely
concerned about the presence of w hich of the follow ing types of bias?
r A. Hawthorne effect
r B . Lead-time bias
r C. Length-time bias
r D. Observer bias
r E. Sampling bias
1
-
2
'
4
5
6 A large study surveyed 24-hour dietary fiber intake in a nationally representative sample of the United States
population. The investigators also collected anthropometric and laboratory data soon after survey
completion. The following results w ere reported for prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and elevated
inflammatory markers per quintiles of daily dietary fiber intake.
50
40
•••.. .. ... ••
p for inflammation = o.o3 •••• •••••
10 Obesity
QL-----------~-----------L----------~------------L---------~
Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3: Quintile 4: Quintile 5:
0.0-6.8g 6.9-12.8g 12.9-22.8g 22.9-26.1g 26.2-222g
-
2
'
4
5 50
6
P for metabolic syndrome <0.01
•••.. ..·-.
40
p for inflammation = o:o3 ...• .....
-----
. ............................. ............~.~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~~: ..... .
P for obesity = 0.04 -.
............., _ .··-.
...."'-:.::::: ................
...... ...................
30
.. .·- ..~
20
• • • · Metabolic syndrome
_....... Inflammation
10 Obesity
QL-----------~-----------L----------~------------L---------~
Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3: Quintile 4: Quintile 5:
0.0-6.8g 6.9-12.8g 12.9-22.8g 22.9-26.1g 26.2-222g
-
Q. ld : 9986 [ Previous Next
3
5
• 6 A 32-year-old w oman comes to the physician w ith urinary burning and frequency. She has no fever or back
o•
pain. Midstream urine (MSU) cultures grow 1 colony forming units (CFU)/ml of enterococci. A previous
publication studied the accuracy of MSU culture in identifying the causative pathogen in patients w ith
uncomplicated cystitis. W omen ages 18-49 w ith symptoms of cystitis provided MSU specimens for
culture. The investigators also collected urine by means of a urethral catheter for culture, w hich served as the
gold standard for confirming the causative pathogen . The follow ing results relating to enterococcal growth
w ere reported for 404 specimens:
Organism Sensitivity Specificity
Number/Total number (%)
Enterococci (CFU/ml)
~102 4/4 (100) 363/400 (91 )
~1 0
3 4/4 (100) 374/400 (94)
~104 4/4 (100) 393/400 (98)
>105 214 (50) 394/400 (98)
Based on the study results, w hat is the positive predictive value of enterococcal growth of 1OS CFU/ml in the
MSU sample?
r A. 10%
r B. 25%
r c. 33%
r D. 50%
n E. 90%
1
2
'
-
•
4
6 A 45-year-old man is diagnosed w ith dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Late gadolinium enhancement
cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR} imaging show s a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF} of 20% and
evidence of extensive midwall m yocardial scarring. A recent study determined prognosis in patients w ith
dilated cardiomyopathy using CMR-derived LVEF and evidence of midwall m yocardial scarring (fibrosis}. Tw o
models w ere assessed: one model w as based on LVEF alone, and the other incorporated the presence or
absence of fibrosis. The follow ing 5-year prediction curves w ere reported:
60
~ - - Fibrosis
.!!I
~ 50 • - • LVEF alone
m
>. • • • • • No fibrosis
~ 40 ... ...
2
.!:! ... ...
¥ 30
0. ... .... .... ... ... ... ...
0~
20 .... .... .... ... ...
.... .... ... ...
............. .......... .......
10
.. .... ._
........ ..........
...... ..-: ... ....... ....-..
Q-L,---------.---------.--------,,--------,---------,
10 20 30 40 50 60
o/o LVEF
1
2
'
-
4
6 70
60
Cardiovascular mortality or transplantation
-""
.!!!
:: 50
ro
Q)
>.
''
~ 40 ''
.2l
0 ''
~ 30 ' '
a.
0~
' '
20 ...... ' '
··- ..... ...... ..... ' .... ....,
10 ....... ···•····· ...., ~
....... ........
0~.---------.---------.--------,,--------.---------,
······ . .. . .........
10 20 30 40 50 60
%LVEF
©USMLEWorld, LLC
Based on the study results, what is the approximate predicted 5-year all-cause mortality for this patient?
r A. 10%
r B. 20%
r c. 30%
r D. 40%
r E. 50%
1
2
'
-
5
Tw o independent research groups are studying the effect of a new anticoagulant on the incidence of
deep-vein thrombosis after hip replacement surgery. The first group designs a 1:1 randomized trial w ith 1000
patients comparing the new drug w ith the standard of care (500 patients in each group). The second group
designs a similar randomized trial but intends to recruit 500 patients (250 patients in each group). Assuming
similar populations for patient recruitment, the small study has a higher chance of w hich of the follow ing?
r A. Early termination
r B. Outcome misclassification
r C. Selection bias
r D. Type I error
r E. Type II error