Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VERSUS
2. THAT the said Judgment be amended to read that the Plaintiff earned
a total sum of Kshs.577,500.00 from VVV Kenya Limited and not Kshs.
877,500.00 as contained in the said Judgment.
3. THAT further, the said Judgment be amended to read that the total sum of
income earned by the Plaintiff from his subsequent employment at VVV
Kenya Limited and VVV Industries Limited, respectively, after premature
determination of his contract of employment with the Defendant amounted to
Kshs. 877,500.00 .
1
4. THAT in the circumstances, the true and rightful amount to be deducted
from the sum of , inter alia, Kshs. 13,689,830.00 awarded to the Plaintiff
for loss of future earnings, should be Kshs. 877,500.00.
5. THAT such further Orders and/or directions be given to the intent that the
amounts payable by the Defendant to the Plaintiff be fully and finally
determined.
c) THAT the total sum therefore earned by the Plaintiff in his subsequent
employments aforesaid amounted to Kshs. 877,500.00
g) THAT however, the learned trial Judge in his said Judgment, relied on the
Plaintiff’s Advocates’ inadvertent arithmetical miscalculation and deducted the
erroneous sum of Kshs. 1,177,500.00 from the amount of Kshs. 13,689,830.00
awarded to the Plaintiff on account of loss of future earnings due to premature
determination of the Plaintiff’s contract of employment as aforesaid.
i) THAT in view of the said arithmetical error contained in the said Judgment,
to date the Plaintiff is yet to extract the Final Decree thereof as the same can
only be extracted after due resolution by the learned trial Judge of the actual
amounts to be deducted from the amount of Kshs.13,689,830.00 awarded to the
Plaintiff on account of loss of future earnings.
k) THAT in view of the foregoing, there is good and sufficient cause for amendment of
the said Judgment as prayed.
l) THAT this application has been made diligently and without unreasonable delay.
m) THAT accordingly, in the interests of justice and fairness , the said Judgment
ought to be reviewed as prayed.
WHICH APPLICATION is further supported by the Affidavits of MORDECAI SHIVAI
and on such other or further grounds as may be adduced at the hearing thereof.
NOTE: If any party served does not appear at the place and
time abovementioned, such orders will be made and
proceedings taken as the Court will deem just and
expedient.