Professional Documents
Culture Documents
+ €DINBVRGH+
THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL
The proposed house is contrary to the Green Belt policies within the adopted
Local Plan. However the proposed physical changes will not alter the open
characteristics of the Green Belt.
1 Purpose of report
To consider application 07/05184/FUL, submitted by Kingsford Estates. The
application is for: Conversion of water storage tank to a house
Site description
The site is bounded by stone walls, the east of which sits on the edge of a
quarry face of the Barnton Quarry. The quarry is now used as a Council Road
Depot. To the north there is woodland with a flat roofed building containing an
electricity sub station. To the south there is the woodland of Corstorphine Hill.
On the western side is the boundary with Clermiston Road North which has
railings and the remnants of stone gate piers. Across the road lies the urban
edge of housing facing the site.
The site lies within the Green Belt and its western edge is clearly defined by
the heel of the footway of Clermiston Road. To the west of Clermiston Road
lies the contrasting character of the urban area.
Site History
The applicants considered that the Council had not determined their proposal
for a Certificate of Lawfulness for an Existing Use or Development for the
Existing Use or Development for the storage of water, falling within Class 6
Storage and Distribution of the Town and Country Planning (Use Class)
(Scotland) Order 1997 and appealed the decision. The appeal was dismissed
on 17.3.05
The proposal is to convert the former water tank into a house. This would be
achieved by removing the front wall of the tank which faces west onto
Clermiston Road North and has been mostly exposed by excavation at
present. The front wall would be mostly triple glazed mounted within timber
frames and there would be a render finish to the flank walls.
A gently curved roof would rise approximately 1.6 metres above the existing
tank height. This roof would be turfed and would merge into the existing
ground levels at either side. Two sets of roof lights would be located at the
highest point of the roof.
The house has been designed to have a low carbon index and will have a low
energy demand because of its partial burial within the ground and high
performance triple glazing on the west elevation. The mass of the structure
will provide thermal storage such that conventional heating may not be
required. Heat recovery ventilation units are proposed within a sealed building
envelope will provide ventilation and heat retention.
Two walls finished in stone would be constructed on either side of the front of
the house to retain existing ground levels. Access to the house would be via a
grass creted driveway leading from the original entrance to the site. The
original gate piers would be reinstated on either side of the entrance.
All existing trees within the site are to be protected during building operations
and will be retained. A badger corridor of a minimum of 1 metre width is
proposed along the rear eastern boundary wall to afford uninterrupted access
4
through the site for badgers. The badger corridor would comprise a 1.8
vertical wooden slatted fence with a concrete base with a badger aperture in
the existing side boundary walls of the site to allow access through it.
Supporting Documents
A design statement has been submitted which provides a site history an urban
context, planning history and design strategy. A badger survey is included
along with a mitigation strategy.
A tree survey report has been submitted which recommends remedial work,
produces a tree constraints plan and a tree protection plan.
Previous Scheme
The grasscrete access did not curve to avoid trees. No proposals existed to
protect the development from noise from the adjacent sub station. No habitat
surveys, tree surveys or protected species surveys were submitted.
5
Determining Issues
If the proposals do comply with the development plan, are there any
compelling reasons for not approving them?
If the proposals do not comply with the development plan, are there any
compelling reasons for approving them?
ASSESSMENT
The Scottish Planning Policy (SSP21) states the key objectives of Green Belt
policy are:
- to direct planned growth to the most appropriate locations and support
regeneration
- to protect and enhance the character, landscape setting and identity of
towns and cities, and
- to protect and give access to open space within and around towns and cities,
as part of the wider structure of green space
The Edinburgh City Local Plan identifies the limited range of uses which will
be permitted within the Green Belt. New housing is not one of them and so the
proposal is contrary to that policy. However, it is appropriate to assess the
proposal’s impact on the Green Belt objectives to determine whether an
exception to policy is justified. The determining issue is whether there is any
6
real harm created by this development in relation to the aims of the Green
Belt. The following paragraphs of this report conclude that whilst the proposal
is contrary to the development plan, the objectives of that plan are not
compromised on this occasion.
b) The footprint of the existing structure on the site i.e. the redundant water
tank, is not changing as the proposed house is to be built within it. There are
additional associated structures such as retaining walls on either side of the
building’s frontage. These are minor additions to the footprint of development
within this site. The same access point is proposed and the new grasscreted
driveway to the house is to be swung away from existing trees to minimise its
impact both visually and protect trees. Likewise, when viewed from the north,
east and south, the curved grass roof, once mature, will be of very little impact
and indeed be an improvement on the present bare concrete roof of the water
tank.
It is from the west that the biggest impact will be viewed but this is set well
back within the site. The frontage of the original wall and associated gate piers
and railings will remain but the proposed full two storey glazed and render
elevation will be visible behind. At present there is the front face of the
concrete water tank. Whilst this had originally been partly submerged in
grassed banking, it still had an element protruding out of the ground providing
a clue to the site’s former use as a water storage tank. Whilst more prominent
than the existing tank, the design of this elevation is high quality and adds
minimally to the mass of the existing structure.
The adjacent electricity sub station to the north is a more prominent feature on
the eastern side of Clermiston Road North. The ‘Earth House’ design is of
high quality and an inventive redevelopment of an existing structure. Being
mostly sunk into the landscape, it successfully minimises visual intrusion into
area.
The house itself is proposed to have a curved grass roof, to be merged into
the landforms. The species of grass to be used on the roof is to be similar to
grasses which exist on the site. A condition removing the normal permitted
development rights of a house and requiring the future maintenance of the
landscaping is required to ensure that the natural appearance of the site is
maintained.
7
A house on this site will generate more activity than the site’s present use as a
redundant water tank. The nature of the site will therefore change due to
human activity. During the day the impact will be less prominent. Night time
activity can be minimised by limiting the site to low level external illumination
and internal domestic illumination only.
This site is unique in its use, its location and relationship with other
surrounding land uses. Across the road to the west is suburban housing and
Clermiston Road North is not a quiet rural road. The site clearly lies within the
green belt and the area of great landscape value. The site is well defined by
its boundary walls and railings and sits adjacent to a large electricity sub
station.
Whilst not a conforming use within the green belt, given the quality of the
design and its minimal impact, the character and appearance of this part of
the green belt and area of great landscape value will not be adversely affected
by the proposal.
c) The area within which the site is located is known to have protected species
activity and surveys were carried out to determine whether the proposal would
adversely affect those species. With regard to badgers, SNH do not object to
the proposal providing mitigation measures are put in place. To that end a
badger run is proposed through the eastern end of the site which will provide
those mitigation measures. Similarly, whilst no Bats were found within the site,
features within it could provide roosting points. Conditions relating to
construction, lighting and pre emptive checking of potential roosting areas
prior to work commencing are required.
In conclusion, the proposals do not comply with the development plan in terms
of being a non conforming use within the Green Belt. However due to the
quality of the development and its minimal impact upon the openness of the
green belt at this location, an exception to Green Belt policy is considered
justified at this location. Residential amenity and natural heritage can be
protected and there is no adverse impact upon road safety. The design of the
house is sustainable.
.i
John Bury
I! $' 'Head of Planning
I McFarlane on 0131 529 3512
. ___ - -
The full details of the application are available for viewing on the Planning and
Building Control Portal : www.edinburgh.gov.uk/planning.
If you require further information about this application you should contact the
following Principal Planner, Helen Martin on 0131 529 3517. Email:
helen.martin@edinburgh.gov.uk.
If this application is not identified on the agenda for presentation, and you wish to
request a presentation of this application at the Committee meeting, you must
contact Committee Services by 9.00a.m. on the Tuesday preceding the meeting on
extension 4229/4239.Alternatively,you may e-mail david.emerson@edinburgh.gov.uk
or henry.scullion@edinburgh.gov.uk
10
Appendix A
* EDINBVRGH
THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL
CITY DEVELOPMENT
The site lies on the north-western slopes of Corstorphine Hill adjacent to the historic
Barnton Road Quarries. As such the site occurs within an area considered to be of
archaeological interest. However given scale of previous quarrying, development
and location the chances of any significant archaeological remains surviving on site
are in my opinion slight.
No objections
Environmental Health has concerns about the proposed development. The electrical
sub station at one boundary of the site emits a low audible hum and there is a City of
Edinburgh Council roads depot at the rear of the site. This depot is operational 24
hours for winter gritting operations and other activities throughout the year. The
development should be designed and constructed so that any noise associated with
the electrical substation complies with NR20 when measured within any nearby living
apartments with the windows open for adequate ventilation.
11
Due to the potential adverse impacts outlined we would not consider supporting
granting of this application until a noise impact assessment has been made.
Proposal
This proposal for a dwelling house is located on the site of an old storage reservoir
on Corstorphine Hill which is designated as Green Belt, Local Nature Conservation
Site and Area of Great Landscape Value within the finalised Edinburgh City Local
Plan.
SNH Position
Scottish Natural Heritage object to this application. This objection may be removed
through conditions to provide adequate protection and mitigation for the badger
population in the area.
A permanently occupied badger sett is situated to the north end of the site, with one
of the sett entrances within the north eastern corner of the application site. A further
sett is located just south of the boundary. Badgers are known to move freely across
the site.
The proposal wishes to exclude badgers from the development site. A site meeting
was held some years ago between SNH, the developer and the Edinburgh and
Lothians Badger Group. A plan was drawn up to fence off a metre of land along the
rear (east) wall of the site and to create badger openings in both north and south
walls. This was to provide a protected corridor across the site, whilst excluding
badgers from the remainder of the land (as per the map submitted by the local
badger group as outlined in the planning statement. The Council should ensure that
these plans are adhered to in order to provide continued access for the badgers
through the site.
Landscaping is proposed for the north east corner of the site to provide screening for
the development. As this is the location of the badger sett, however, these plans will
have to be examined for their implications to the badgers and adequate mitigation
incorporated within the plans. The current landscape proposals are not adequate, as
they make no reference to the presence and implications of the sett. A landscaping
plan should be drawn up which gives full consideration to the presence of the badger
sett, including any required mitigation measures.
Points of access for machinery should also be considered and should avoid
disturbance of badger setts.
Additional Comments
SNH have been subsequently contacted about the submitted badger protection
measures which were drafted by the Edinburgh and Lothians Badger Group.
Providing a condition is imposed requiring the implementation of those protection
measures in consultation with SNH and the Edinburgh and Lothians Badger Group
then their initial objection to the proposal is removed.
Scottish Water
In terms of planning consent, Scottish Water will not object to this planning
application however please note that any planning approval granted by the Local
Authority does not guarantee a connection to our infrastructure until a satisfactory
solution is identified.
Marchbank Water Treatment Works currently has sufficient capacity to service this
proposed development.
Water Network - there may be issues within our Water Network that serves your
proposed development.
Ause PFI Edinburgh Waste Water Treatment Works currently has sufficient capacity
to service this proposed development.
Waste Water Network - there may be issues within our Waste Water Network that
serves your proposed development.
Scottish Water’s current minimum level of service for water pressure is 1.0 bar or
10m head in the public main. Any property which cannot be adequately serviced
using this pressure may require private pumping arrangements installed, subject to
compliance with the current water byelaws. If the developer wishes to enquire about
Scottish Water’s procedure for checking the water pressure in the area then they
must write to our Planning and Development Services at the above address.
Clearly the location has not changed and the same concerns we expressed
previously, regarding the suitability of any development within this protected area.
However I am aware that the local plan and its policies are under review. This may of
course offer a different policy framework against which this application could be
assessed.
1) The existing site is bounded by a stone wall and there would not appear to any
established access routes through the site.
2) Under its former use as an operational water tank, the entire site would have been
considered as ‘curtilage’ of a commercial / industrial installation and as such, access
rights under Part I Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 would not have applied.
3) Similarly, change of use to a residential dwelling would mean that the area within
the walled perimeter would be considered a reasonable ‘zone of privacy’ , and as
such access rights would not apply.
4) Even if access rights did previously apply to the site, the local authority can still
grant planning permission for appropriate development.
Given the sensitivity of this site and in particular issues in relation to badgers it might
be expedient to allow the Lothian and Borders group to comment on the badger
report provided by the developers.
Environmental Health has reviewed RMP acoustic report U4386N08 which details
the noise profile of the electrical sub station and the roads depot at the rear of the
site. RMP have undertaken noise measurements at the site and predicted that the
noise associated with the electrical substation would fail to comply with NR20 unless
6m high acoustic barrier is built. The report also suggests that the noise impact from
the road depot could generate complaints during night time operations but this could
be mitigated by the use of acoustic double glazing on the windows.
Discussions with the Planning Department have indicated that a 6m high stone
barrier may not be acceptable at this location. Environmental Health will not consider
supporting granting of this application unless appropriate mitigation measures can be
undertaken to control the noise from the sub station to below NR20.
Additional Comments
Environmental Assessment had concerns about the noise from the electrical sub
station at the site boundary. A RMP acoustic report U4386B/08 was undertaken and
this outlines the noise profile of the electrical sub station. The report concludes that
an acoustic enclosure can be built to cover the transformer to ensure that NR20
condition can be met at the proposed residential development. The report outlines
the requirement for the correct type of roofing and walls to be used and that natural
ventilation can be provided by acoustic trickle vents. Overall the sound reduction
level provided should be equal to or greater thanl9db at the 125Hz frequency band.
A legal agreement with Scottish Power has been reached to build an appropriate
acoustic enclosure over the sub station. This is dealt with in separate planning
14
I ) The development shall be designed and constructed so that any noise associated
with the electrical substation complies with NR20 when measured within any nearby
living apartment with the windows open for adequate ventilation.
2) The residential development shall not be occupied until the acoustic enclosure
detailed in application 08/04325/FUL is completed, all to the satisfaction of the Head
of Planning.
Representations
The proposal was advertised on 21 .I1.2007 and two letters of objection have been
received.
Planning Policy
The proposal lies within the Edinburgh Green Belt where the existing rural character
and amenities are to be protected and there is a presumption against new
development. The site is also identified as an Area of Great Landscape Value and as
an Area of Nature Conservation Interest.
The proposal lies within the Edinburgh Green belt. The site is also identified as being
within an Area of Great Landscape Value and a Local Nature Conservation Site.
An objection to the Finalised Edinburgh City Local Plan seeks the removal of this site
from the Green Belt, Nature Conservation Site and Area of Great Landscape Value.
The Council has not accepted that objection. The Report of Inquiry is expected in
Summer 2009.
Relevant Policies:
Policy HOU8 presumes against new housing on greenfield sites other than to meet
Policy ENVID states that local plans should include policies for protecting and
enhancing Regional and Local Natural Built Environment Interests.
Policy ENV2 presumes against development in the Green Belt unless necessary for
the purpose of agriculture, forestry, countryside recreation or other uses appropriate
to the rural character of the area
Policy H I supports the development of identified housing sites (HSG 1 - HSG 13)
and will encourage the development for housing of other suitable sites within the
urban area provided proposals are in accordance with other local plan
considerations, including the need to protect amenity and safeguard land of
recreational and landscape significance.
Policy H3 requires all new housing development to make provision for landscaping
and open space in conformity with the Council's standards.
Policy H4 requires new development to be sympathetic in scale and density with its
surroundings. In conservation areas and defined "areas of interest" in particular,
special care is required to protect local character and amenity.
Policy T4 states that adequate provision for car parking must be made by developers
in all new development in conformity with the Council's adopted standards.
Policy E5 states that new buildings, in terms of design, materials and landscaping,
should make a positive contribution to the overall quality of the environment and
regard should be had to their setting and neighbouring development.
16
Policy E9 states that planning permission will not be given for new development or
redevelopment in the Green Belt for purposes other than agriculture, forestry,
outdoor recreation or other uses appropriate only to a rural area, except where it can
be shown to be necessary and no suitable location exists.
Policy E10 states that within the designated Area of Great Landscape Value, the
retention of landscape quality will be the overriding consideration in dealing with
development proposals.
Policy E l 1(a) states that areas of high nature conservation value are to be protected
from damaging development, and that the impact of development proposals on
wildlife habitat will be taken into consideration.
Policy Des 1 (Design Quality and Context) sets general criteria for assessing design
quality and requires an overall design concept to be demonstrated.
Policy Des 3 (Development Design) sets criteria for assessing development design.
Policy Env 9 (Green Belt) identifies the types of development that will be permitted in
the Green Belt.
Policy Env 11 (Trees) sets out tree protection requirements for new development.
Policy Env 15 (Species) sets out species protection requirements for new
development.
Policy Tra 3 (Private Car Parking) requires private car parking provision to comply
with the parking levels set out in supplementary planning guidance, and sets criteria
for assessing lower provision.
Appendix B
+EDINBVRGH*
THE CITY OF E D I N B U R G H COUNClL
CITY DEVELOPMENT
Conditions
IO. The development shall be designed and constructed so that any noise
associated with the electrical substation complies with NR20 when
measured within any nearby living apartment with the windows open
for adequate venti Iation.
Reasons
IN FORMATIVES
End
22
Appendix C
*EDINBVRGH*
T H E C I T Y OF E D I N B U R G H C O U N C I L
C I T Y DEVELOPMENT
Location Plan
Reproduction from the Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office 0 Crown
Copyright.
Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number
100023420 The City of Edinburgh Council 2005.
1
+€DINBVRGH*
THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL
Item no
Report no
1 Purpose of report
To consider application 08/04325/FUL, submitted by Mr Watts. The
application is for: Alterations to substation including new roof and
flanking walls to transformer to provide acoustic containment
Site description
The site is a large electricity sub station located on the eastern side of
Clermiston Road North to the south of its junction with Queensferry Road. The
site is surrounded by the woodland of Corstorphine Hill on the north and
eastern sides, with the Council’s Roads depot in a quarry beyond. Residential
2
properties lie across the road to the west. To the south there is a redundant
water tank.
The site is in the Green Belt.
Site History
No recent history for this site but to the south a planning application to convert
a former water tank to a house has been submitted (07/05184/FUL).
Determininn Issues
If the proposals do comply with the development plan, are there any
compelling reasons for not approving them?
If the proposals do not comply with the development plan, are there any
compelling reasons for approving them?
ASSESSMENT
b) whether the design and scale of the proposal is acceptable in this area of
green belt and area of great landscape value or adversely affects the natural
environment
a) The site is a non conforming use within the green belt. The proposal does
not alter this position.
c) The proposal will not create any unacceptable overshadowing and current
noise levels will be reduced. Residential amenity will be protected.
In conclusion, the proposal not intensify the existing non conforming use
within the green belt. The scale of the development does not adversely affect
the character and appearance of the green belt nor adversely affect the area
of great landscape value. Residential amenity is protected. There are no other
material considerations which outweigh this conclusion.
John Bury
Head of Planning
________
Contacthe1 David McFarlane on 0131 529 3512
___~______
A03 - Drum Brae/Gyle (NEW)
- __-
Drawing numbers/
Scheme
4
The full details of the application are available for viewing on the Planning and
Building Control Portal : www.ed inburgh .gov.uk/planning.
If you require further information about this application you should contact the
following Principal Planner, Helen Martin on 0131 529 3517. Email:
helen.martin@edinburgh.gov.uk.
If this application is not identified on the agenda for presentation, and you wish to
request a presentation of this application at the Committee meeting, you must
contact Committee Services by 9.00a.m. on the Tuesday preceding the meeting on
extension 4229/4239.Alternatively,you may e-mail david.emerson@edinburgh.gov.uk
or henry.scullion@edinburgh.gov.uk
5
Appendix A
+EDINBVRGH
THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL
+
CITY DEVELOPMENT
Representations
Planning Policy
The proposal lies within an area allocated as Green Belt where the existing rural
character and amenities are to be protected and there is a general presumption
against new development. The site is also identified as an Area of Great Landscape
Value and as an Area of Nature Conservation Interest.
The proposal lies within an area allocated as Greenbelt. The site is also identified as
being an Area of Great Landscape Value and a Local Nature Conservation Site.
Relevant Policies:
Policy E5 states that new buildings, in terms of design, materials and landscaping,
should make a positive contribution to the overall quality of the environment and
regard should be had to their setting and neighbouring development.
Policy E9 states that planning permission will not be given for new development or
redevelopment in the Green Belt for purposes other than agriculture, forestry,
outdoor recreation or other uses appropriate only to a rural area, except where it can
be shown to be necessary and no suitable location exists.
Policy E10 states that within the designated Area of Great Landscape Value, the
retention of landscape quality will be the overriding consideration in dealing with
development proposals.
Policy E l l(a) states that areas of high nature conservation value are to be protected
from damaging development, and that the impact of development proposals on
wildlife habitat will be taken into consideration.
7
Policy Des 1 (Design Quality and Context) sets general criteria for assessing design
quality and requires an overall design concept to be demonstrated.
Policy Des 3 (Development Design) sets criteria for assessing development design.
Policy Env 9 (Green Belt) identifies the types of development that will be permitted in
the Green Belt.
Appendix B
-GDfNBVRGH
THE CITY O F EDINBURGH COUNCIL
+
CITY DEVELOPMENT
Conditions
Reasons
End
9
Appendix C
*€DINBVRGH
THE C I T Y O F E D I N B U R G H C O U l l C l L
CITY DEVELOPMENT
Location Plan
Reproduction from the Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office 0Crown
Copyright.
Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number
100023420 The City of Edinburgh Council 2005.